Hold the phone, we were just told that FOX is in the Cain corner. So confusing.

Did I call it?

They are discussing a token VP.

Hold the phone, we were just told Chuck Todd was a racist for saying the same thing Bill O’Reilly just said.

I thought Cain was all Foxs doing? Anyway who gives a crap what O’Reilly or Chuck Todd thinks about him. Just keep talking about him…Unlike most Libs and their talking heads, most conservatives dont hang on every word these mulletheads say… I think Herman is going to be a force

Herman Cain has no chance, because he’s an idiot.

Of the latter point, Morris insisted once again that Sen. Marco Rubio must be the running mate because “it’s obvious you need to take the Latino vote away from Obama” (he did not elaborate how Sen. Rubio’s Cuban-American Republican background would convince Mexican- and South American Democrats, whose primary voting issue is immigration, to vote against Obama).

It’s all about Florida, Frances. All the Republican candidate has to do is deny Obama Florida and Ohio, and he’s a one term loser. He can already forget about Ohio. Get Florida’s Cuban voter base to vote for the Republican candidate and Obama is toast.

Publius219 said:
Herman Cain has no chance, because he’s an idiot.

If he’s an idiot Obama must be a moron

Publius219 said:
Herman Cain has no chance, because he’s an idiot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daISg1Hc0ps&feature=player_embedded

dick morris is getting dumber…after TRUMP pulled out, it was mitt romney’s for the taking? were the republicans seriously considering trump?

Does anybody on the right really buy into anything Dick Morris says?

OxyCon said:
It’s all about Florida, Frances. All the Republican candidate has to do is deny Obama Florida and Ohio, and he’s a one term loser. He can already forget about Ohio. Get Florida’s Cuban voter base to vote for the Republican candidate and Obama is toast.

Obama has a secret weapon in Ohio. His name is Kasich. In Fla., if you play to the pre-Castro Cubans, you p-o the Puerto Ricans and Dominicans.
Don’t know if you are aware of it, but the Cubans are maybe the most hated among the Latino community.

Nacho said:
Does anybody on the right really buy into anything Dick Morris says?

His hookers, if the price is right.

Glackin said:
Don’t know if you are aware of it, but the Cubans are maybe the most hated among the Latino community.

Hated by who? I’m sure Frances would be interested in knowing that.

Morris is a horrible barometer of anything on the Conservative side.

That is all. :)

Liberal Tormentor - tormenting liberals with logic and facts since 1972 said:
Hold the phone, we were just told that FOX is in the Cain corner. So confusing.

Cain is a no-go for me.
Same with Bachmann.

Fox is becoming shills for Romney and Bachmann. Totally making Fox unwatchable.

OxyCon said:
It’s all about Florida, Frances. All the Republican candidate has to do is deny Obama Florida and Ohio, and he’s a one term loser. He can already forget about Ohio. Get Florida’s Cuban voter base to vote for the Republican candidate and Obama is toast.

Palin/West – That’s my ticket until Palin says she’s out. :) Otherwise, I don’t vote for someone (unless Ryan or Perry decides to get in) and it’s just an anti-Obama vote. I’d rather have a Pro-Someone vote though.

I think it will be Bachmann-Rubio. Just my bet.

david r said:
I think it will be Bachmann-Rubio. Just my bet.

What a crappy ticket.

david r said:
I think it will be Bachmann-Rubio. Just my bet.

A “Pro-Business” ticket would be Romney/Cain, Cain/Romney. And the way the economy is going, it’ll be the number one issue.

This is the guy who said all of 2007 and 2008 that our next president would be Hillary Clinton. Morris is never right about anything.

Romney and someone from the Mountain West in which the Republicans have been faltering so badly. Likely a nobody since Romney is so delicate.

Ramrants said:
This is the guy who said all of 2007 and 2008 that our next president would be Hillary Clinton. Morris is never right about anything.

In 2000, Morris said there was no possibility of a popular vote/electoral vote split.

OxyCon said:
A “Pro-Business” ticket would be Romney/Cain, Cain/Romney. And the way the economy is going, it’ll be the number one issue.

Logically, the only vote I see absolutely winning is a Romney-Palin. It’ll never happen, but it would quiet everyone. But I don’t see Palin as a VP since she was mishandled before. That and she’s a leader not a follower. However, if that ever happened, it would be epic.

Sorry to say but Cain is soooo bad. I like him in theory. But he’s not ready for prime-time yet.

OxyCon said:
It’s all about Florida, Frances. All the Republican candidate has to do is deny Obama Florida and Ohio, and he’s a one term loser. He can already forget about Ohio. Get Florida’s Cuban voter base to vote for the Republican candidate and Obama is toast.

The Cuban base already overwhelming vote Republican. You forget…they are here because they are escaping a communist regime. Why would they vote Dem? That’s what they left.

OxyCon said:
A “Pro-Business” ticket would be Romney/Cain, Cain/Romney. And the way the economy is going, it’ll be the number one issue.

http://www.godfathers.com/join%5Four%5Fteam/

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
In 2000, Morris said there was no possibility of a popular vote/electoral vote split.

Yeah, like I said…when has he ever been right. Why would anyone pay him for his analysis?

WCinWI said:
Fox is becoming shills for Romney and Bachmann. Totally making Fox unwatchable.

That would be your clearest indication who the RNC/party leaders are supporting.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
That would be your clearest indication who the RNC/party leaders are supporting.

How many times must I say that you add nothing to debate? I’m amazed that you’re still around with so few of the old liberal posters commenting.

BFD said:
Hold the phone, we were just told Chuck Todd was a racist for saying the same thing Bill O’Reilly just said.

Just a testament to how deranged some of these people are..

Ramrants said:
The Cuban base already overwhelming vote Republican. You forget…they are here because they are escaping a communist regime. Why would they vote Dem? That’s what they left.

From the 2008 Florida exit poll data:

Obama won 57 percent of the Hispanic vote, surpassing President Bush’s 55 percent in 2004, and Sen. McCain got 42 percent.
Exit polls showed that 84 percent of Miami-Dade Cuban-Americans over 65 voted for Sen. McCain, and 55 percent of those 29 or younger voted for President-elect Obama.

The Cuban youth vote went for Obama.

The person who will win the republican nomination isn’t even in the race yet. I’m not sure why BillO is having such hissy fits and trying to be a king maker of sorts – he just doesn’t have that kind of clout with the public. He needs to back off his predictions a little and let the voices be heard before he makes these declarative statements.

TfT said:
The person who will win the republican nomination isn’t even in the race yet.

Trump 2012!

TfT said:
The person who will win the republican nomination isn’t even in the race yet. I’m not sure why BillO is having such hissy fits and trying to be a king maker of sorts – he just doesn’t have that kind of clout with the public. He needs to back off his predictions a little and let the voices be heard before he makes these declarative statements.

Yes. He speaks out of his butt so much you’d think he was one of the commenters on this site.

As our President trends ahead of Reagan at this point of his presidency, mirrors Clinton… the right is oddly fractured amongst those who reside in all important middle, pull from the libertarian fringe and attempt to assert from the newly constructed confederacy… all looks well!

Greg said:
As our President trends ahead of Reagan at this point of his presidency, mirrors Clinton… the right is oddly fractured amongst those who reside in all important middle, pull from the libertarian fringe and attempt to assert from the newly constructed confederacy… all looks well!

I do love how Obama is “our President,” but Bush was “your President… because I didn’t vote for him.”

Not saying that’s you, Greg… but it was plenty of your political allies.

Anyway, with the economy continuing its downward trend, I wouldn’t put too much stock into Reagan or Clinton’s comparative numbers. There are other factors at work (against) Obama.

WCinWI said:
How many times must I say that you add nothing to debate? I’m amazed that you’re still around with so few of the old liberal posters commenting.

Inherently secure individuals do not need endless affirmation. In fact, they eschew it.

ImNotBlue said:
I do love how Obama is “our President,” but Bush was “your President… because I didn’t vote for him.”

Not saying that’s you, Greg… but it was plenty of your political allies.
Obama.

THAT is the kind of crap that gets the right ridiculed. “I’m NOT saying you are_________,BUT, a LOT OF________.”
Translation, “I have this unfounded accusation, and I’ll just throw it out.”WHAT A CROCK!

Glackin said:
THAT is the kind of crap that gets the right ridiculed. “I’m NOT saying you are_________,BUT, a LOT OF________.”Translation, “I have this unfounded accusation, and I’ll just throw it out.”WHAT A CROCK!

Sooo… are you saying that folks on the left didn’t say, “Your President,” and “He’s not my President, I didn’t vote for him,” Glacks? Are you making that claim?

david r said:
I think it will be Bachmann-Rubio. Just my bet.

No, I don’t see Rubio getting in this time, but I really think we will see a Pres. Rubio in the future. Sorry, WC, it’s not my first choice, but I’m calling it now for Romney/Bachmann. That’s just my wild guess at what’s gonna happen. I like Palin, but I don’t think she’s running.

ImNotBlue said:
Sooo… are you saying that folks on the left didn’t say, “Your President,” and “He’s not my President, I didn’t vote for him,” Glacks? Are you making that claim?

What I am saying is that you wanted to interject that into the thread, and did it by using a trojan horse. No one here said it, but you wanted to argue that it had been said somewhere, sometime.
“Some people say” is a BS line that means nothing.
“Some people say the moon is made of green cheese.”
“Some say the earth is flat.”
“Some say Obama is a Muslim.”
“Some say___________________.”
Pick your own fantasy.
If you want to argue, get married.

Billo, you old doofus. Ever since you’ve been spouting off as some kind of self-proclaimed expert on Presidential Elections you’ve lost over 1,000,000 viewers. Just shut the hell up and let the process take shape on its own without you and your blowhard buddy, Donald Trump’s arrogance. Both of you old codgers just shuit up, period.

The nomination depends on whether we want the US to become a third world country or regain its stature and the manufacturing giant of the world. If the latter is the case, Ron Paul and Herman Cain is THE ticket. But, be assured, “We the People” will get whomever the big money wants us to have. If that were NOT true, McCain would never have been nominated. Had *all* candidates been given an equal opportunity to present their cases in the ’08 debates, McCain would have come in last.

OxyCon said:
Hated by who? I’m sure Frances would be interested in knowing that.

Get a life. The various Latin communities have strong nationalist ties. They aren’t all alike because they speak the same language. And, just as Westerners look down on “city slickers” and Easterners laugh about “hayseeds” and “rednecks”, there are divides. Try calling a Puerto Rican a “hivero” and see what happens.

X-3 said:
The nomination depends on whether we want the US to become a third world country or regain its stature and the manufacturing giant of the world. If the latter is the case, Ron Paul and Herman Cain is THE ticket

of course, to become the “manufacturing giant of the world,” cain and paul would have to:

a) completely gut all environmental protections

b) completely destroy unions and the minimum wage

c) cut corporate tax rates, and taxes on the wealthy, even further

d) poison every waterway; chop down every forest; and kill every last endangered species

e) repeal discrimination-based legislation

which, mind you, isn’t too far from what cain is proposing we do right now.

and btw, we already are a “manufacturing giant,” it’s just that workers aren’t sharing
in the profits like they were 40-50 years ago.

now, workers’ wages are stagnant, healthcare/housing are more expensive,
and prices are going up and up.

of course, republicans like cain LOVE this, because that means……more for them and
less for the american worker, who produce all the wealth anyways.

USA Today today said that during the debate, 25% of Internet searches were related to Herman Cain. If you look up “bloviate” in the dictionary, I’m pretty sure there is a big color picture of Mr. Bill…
Run, Herman, Run!

Ed Williams said:
USA Today today said that during the debate, 25% of Internet searches were related to Herman Cain. If you look up “bloviate” in the dictionary, I’m pretty sure there is a big color picture of Mr. Bill…
Run, Herman, Run!

yeah, and lady gaga sells a lot of records, so what’s your point?

Glackin said:
What I am saying is that you wanted to interject that into the thread, and did it by using a trojan horse. No one here said it, but you wanted to argue that it had been said somewhere, sometime.

No one said what? The post I was responding to clearly said, “our President,” which reminded me of all the debates I had just a few years ago with the “your President” type people. So I mentioned it, and moved on.

What’s your problem, Glacks? Not enough to get angry about, so you have to manufacture something? Yeesh.

“Some people say” is a BS line that means nothing.
“Some people say the moon is made of green cheese.”
“Some say the earth is flat.”
“Some say Obama is a Muslim.”
“Some say___________________.”
Pick your own fantasy.
If you want to argue, get married.

So again, are you saying that “some people” didn’t say that? Were you one of those people?

You seem awfully defensive… especially since the comment wasn’t actually directed towards you. What’s wrong buddy?

ImNotBlue said:
I do love how Obama is “our President,” but Bush was “your President… because I didn’t vote for him.”

Not saying that’s you, Greg… but it was plenty of your political allies.

Anyway, with the economy continuing its downward trend, I wouldn’t put too much stock into Reagan or Clinton’s comparative numbers. There are other factors at work (against) Obama.

That is your FULL comment. “Plenty” of people said it. What you said can’t be proved or disproved. It is useless, except as a attack.
I’m glad to discuss, but the right wants to argue.
Next comes snark, then name calling, then we are back to “notsofast” vs. “Sam M.”
I for one would like to get away from there.

darladoon said:
and btw, we already are a “manufacturing giant,” it’s just that workers aren’t sharing
in the profits like they were 40-50 years ago.

now, workers’ wages are stagnant, healthcare/housing are more expensive,
and prices are going up and up.

of course, republicans like cain LOVE this, because that means……more for them and
less for the american worker, who produce all the wealth anyways.

housing are more expensive? Where do you live?

When do you graduate Darla? How many more “media” courses till you’re ready for the job market?

Glackin said:
That is your FULL comment. “Plenty” of people said it. What you said can’t be proved or disproved. It is useless, except as a attack.

So if I do a Google search for “Bush” and “Not my President,” or “I didn’t vote for him,” and then looked for… oh, I don’t know… shirts, hats, buttons, articles, blogs, pictures, and whatever else… I wouldn’t find anything? And that wouldn’t serve as proof?

Are you sure you want to make that claim, Glacks?

I’m glad to discuss, but the right wants to argue.

Again the, “It’s not my fault, it’s everyone else who made me this way” excuse. Yawn.

Next comes snark, then name calling, then we are back to “notsofast” vs. “Sam M.”

And Royal King, Bovine (aka Skippy), BFD, and… Glackin.

I for one would like to get away from there.

Prove it. Demonstrate you desire to have more serious discussions by having more serious discussions! Ignore the people who “cause” you to be rude, and only converse with those who serve your academic purpose. Go ahead! If you really mean it, do it.

Glackin said:
Next comes snark, then name calling, then we are back to “notsofast” vs. “Sam M.”

Glackin vs notsofast ……very serious discussions . So serious , you became Facebook User in fact . : (

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/donald-trump-to-fox-news-charles-krauthammer-is-%e2%80%98just-a-sad-fool%e2%80%99/comment-page-2/#comment-435855

Let’s start here. I think BOR is out of line saying Bachmann is “VP” material only, and that Cain has “no shot”.
Dismissing MB to the #2 spot smells of sexism. Every candidate is in it to win it, and should be judged on that basis.
Cain wowed the 1st debate, was weaker in this one (I thought). But he has several pluses, and time.
BOR is a known pompous @ss, and this thread shows more about him than the candidates, IMHO.

George C said:
Glackin vs notsofast ……very serious discussions . So serious , you became Facebook User in fact . : (

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/donald-trump-to-fox-news-charles-krauthammer-is-%e2%80%98just-a-sad-fool%e2%80%99/comment-page-2/#comment-435855

Still believe in leprechauns?

Glackin said:
Still believe in leprechauns?

Why have they been banned for thei postings here as well ?

George C said:
Why have they been banned for thei postings here as well ?

George, I’m posting. Under my own name. I said before I was “moderated” for a week. Then I was back. From the dead. I MUST BE IMMORTAL!

George C said:
Why have they been banned for thei postings here as well ?

It is not necessary for you to prostrate yourself in my presence. A simple grovel will suffice.

Glackin said:
George, I’m posting. Under my own name. I said before I was “moderated” for a week. Then I was back. From the dead. I MUST BE IMMORTAL!

I thought the site was hacked , no ?

George C said:
I thought the site was hacked , no ?

There are words under FU that I posted as Glackin.
There are words under FU that I did not write.
There are posts by FU on the page you keep citing in which FU attacks “Glackin”.
I don’t argue with myself in public. I leave that to Juarez/WC and the other multi-personae who inhabit these environs.
I am not, nor ever have been, FU.
If you choose not to believe me, FU.

Glackin says:

Thanks patsy!

Glackin said:
There are words under FU that I posted as Glackin.
There are words under FU that I did not write.
There are posts by FU on the page you keep citing in which FU attacks “Glackin”.
I don’t argue with myself in public. I leave that to Juarez/WC and the other multi-personae who inhabit these environs.
I am not, nor ever have been, FU.
If you choose not to believe me, FU.

The site was hacked !!!

I was moderated ( temporarily) !!!

I was impersonated !!!

What a Glackhole.

George C said:
What a Glackhole.

Glackhole ™

George C said:
Glackhole ™

And The C stands for cornhole?

Glackin said:
And The C stands for cornhole?

Costanza …….not bright are ya ?

Liberal Tormentor - tormenting liberals with logic and facts since 1972 said:
No, I don’t see Rubio getting in this time, but I really think we will see a Pres. Rubio in the future. Sorry, WC, it’s not my first choice, but I’m calling it now for Romney/Bachmann. That’s just my wild guess at what’s gonna happen. I like Palin, but I don’t think she’s running.

All I’ll say is that the Palin camp sees what the Romney camp is doing with the Bachmann camp and the Palin camp would be willing to throw the election against the RINOS to teach them a lesson. I have no faith in a Romney or a Bachmann. I don’t know how you excite the base. Bachmann doesn’t do it like she used to.

WCinWI said:
I don’t know how you excite the base.

Economy..Illegal immigration/borders, in that order. ;)

George C said:
I thought the site was hacked , no ?

The site was hacked? What the? Is that where all of the old liberals went? The garbage bin?

George C said:
I thought the site was hacked , no ?

If you knew how much sleep I lost worrying about what you, Juarez/WC, Imnotblue, seek, notsofast(whoever he is this week) and the rest of the Flintstones thought of me, it would embarrass you.
You fools are a laugh riot! I might as well be Samuel Johnson. I’ve got several Boswells who keep track of my every word. I must be keeping several trolls working following me.
I ought to apply for an SBA Loan, I’m boosting the economy.

Jaurez said:
Economy..Illegal immigration/borders, in that order. ;)

Yes….I’m merely saying that a joint ticket by Romney/Bachmann would more piss off people than excite them. :)

George C said:
Costanza …….not bright are ya ?

Cornhole fits. Costanza is taken.

Glackin said:
If you knew how much sleep I lost worrying about what you, Juarez/WC, Imnotblue, seek, notsofast(whoever he is this week) and the rest of the Flintstones thought of me, it would embarrass you.
You fools are a laugh riot! I might as well be Samuel Johnson. I’ve got several Boswells who keep track of my every word. I must be keeping several trolls working following me.
I ought to apply for an SBA Loan, I’m boosting the economy.

I could sue you for libel for the many times that you’ve said that I’ve had multiple personality disorder. Not cool Glackin. Not cool.

Glackin said:
If you knew how much sleep I lost worrying about what you, Juarez/WC, Imnotblue, seek, notsofast(whoever he is this week) and the rest of the Flintstones thought of me, it would embarrass you.
You fools are a laugh riot! I might as well be Samuel Johnson. I’ve got several Boswells who keep track of my every word. I must be keeping several trolls working following me.
I ought to apply for an SBA Loan, I’m boosting the economy.

What a Glackhole ™.

Glackin said:
Cornhole fits. Costanza is taken.

Cornhole already exists as a game. George C. is no game. He’s serious business. The funnies business.

WCinWI said:
Cornhole already exists as a game. George C. is no game. He’s serious business. The funnies business.

Another of your personae? Are you Sybil? You speak for so many, with such authority. You have no problem telling others what they should do.
Why not tell yourself where to go and what to do?

Glackin said:
Another of your personae? Are you Sybil? You speak for so many, with such authority. You have no problem telling others what they should do.
Why not tell yourself where to go and what to do?

I speak for myself. You’re delusional. You think that I have multiple personalities. You might want to pull a Weiner and do some retrospection. Unlike you, as has been mentioned before, I’m on the ONE name that I’ve ever created and “managed”. Now please leave me alone as you are crazy, talking about multiple personalities and so on. Such libel.

Glackin said:
Another of your personae? Are you Sybil? You speak for so many, with such authority. You have no problem telling others what they should do.
Why not tell yourself where to go and what to do?

What a Glackhole ™.

OW8 , I meant to post that as George C !

tws258 said:
OW8 , I meant to post that as George C !

HA !

WCinWI said:
I speak for myself. You’re delusional. You think that I have multiple personalities. You might want to pull a Weiner and do some retrospection. Unlike you, as has been mentioned before, I’m on the ONE name that I’ve ever created and “managed”. Now please leave me alone as you are crazy, talking about multiple personalities and so on. Such libel.

Such an idiot. Check the Chuck Todd thread.
Forty of you neanderthals have thumbed down the results of three elections. You would ignore the truth until it bit your @ss. Whoever was FU, it weren’t me. babe.
BTW: How many personae can you round up at 2:30 AM to use “George C.”‘s trade-marked word? How much do you get paid for it?

On a dark desert highway, cool wind in my hair
Warm smell of colitas rising up through the air
Up ahead in the distance I saw a shimmering light
My head grew heavy and my sight grew dim
I had to stop for the night

There she stood in the doorway, I heard the mission bell
Then I was thinking to myself this could be Heaven or this could be Hell
Then she lit up a candle and she showed me the way
There were voices down the corridor I thought I heard them say

“Welcome to the Hotel Mediaite
Such a lovely place
Such a lovely face
Plenty of room at the Hotel Mediaite
Any time of year
You can find it here”

Her mind is Tiffany twisted, she got the Mercedes Benz
She got a lot of pretty, pretty boys that she calls friends
How they dance in the courtyard, sweet summer sweat
Some dance to remember, some dance to forget

So I called up the captain, “Please bring me my wine”
He said, “We haven’t had that spirit here since 1969″
And still those voices are calling from far away
Wake you up in the middle of the night just to hear them say

“Welcome to the Hotel Mediate
Such a lovely place
(Such a lovely place)
Such a lovely face
They’re living it up at the Hotel Mediaite
What a nice surprise
(What a nice surprise)
Bring your alibis”

Mirrors on the ceiling, the pink champagne on ice
And she said, “We are all just prisoners here of our own device”
And in the master’s chambers they gathered for the feast
They stab it with their steely knives but they just can’t kill the beast

Last thing I remember I was running for the door
I had to find the passage back to the place I was before
“Relax,” said the night man, “We are programmed to receive
You can check out any time you like but you can never leave”

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Glackin said:
Such an idiot. Check the Chuck Todd thread.
Forty of you neanderthals have thumbed down the results of three elections. You would ignore the truth until it bit your @ss. Whoever was FU, it weren’t me. babe.
BTW: How many personae can you round up at 2:30 AM to use “George C.”’s trade-marked word? How much do you get paid for it?

I’ve counted four names that she uses. She also misspells words to throw everybody off her trail, but when you repeat phases it becomes easy to spot.

I think Dick Morris still thinks the world is flat. Has he been right about anything? But I guess thats why he’s on FOX.

WCinWI said:
How many times must I say that you add nothing to debate? I’m amazed that you’re still around with so few of the old liberal posters commenting.

Fact: Romney is a RINO and he doesn’t deserve any conservatives vote. He flips as much as John Kerry did. Pathetic.

Glackin said:
What I am saying is that you wanted to interject that into the thread, and did it by using a trojan horse. No one here said it, but you wanted to argue that it had been said somewhere, sometime.“Some people say” is a BS line that means nothing.“Some people say the moon is made of green cheese.”“Some say the earth is flat.”“Some say Obama is a Muslim.”“Some say___________________.”Pick your own fantasy.If you want to argue, get married.

Fact: This wigging out on the threads happen to all the loony lefties on this site.

seek said:
housing are more expensive? Where do you live? When do you graduate Darla? How many more “media” courses till you’re ready for the job market?

Fact: Not to piss in your discussion my housing taxes go up yearly and it’s real hard to fight to get it back down. Thus housing is more expensive.

Just4thefax said:
Fact: Not to piss in your discussion my housing taxes go up yearly and it’s real hard to fight to get it back down. Thus housing is more expensive.

that’s odd – ours went down (in two different markets – they both dropped)

Fact: O’Reilly is not on a spot that most Americans are in about their futures so I say Bachmann has a much better understanding of what’s going on here in real America than he does but hey if he’s right then okay she would make a good VP as well as top spot as President but time will tell as the GOP race goes on and the field gets more clear.

seek said:
that’s odd – ours went down (in two different markets – they both dropped)

Fact: greed is greed.

Yoda002 said:
I think Dick Morris still thinks the world is flat. Has he been right about anything? But I guess thats why he’s on FOX.

Fact: Not Fox news fault it’s putting old liberals on Fox news that’s the problem.

Glackin said:
Dismissing MB to the #2 spot smells of sexism. Every candidate is in it to win it, and should be judged on that basis.

Are you serious? Because O’Reilly thinks that Bachmann is better suited for the VP role, you think it’s sexism? You’ve got to be joking.

Is it sexism every time a commentator says “he’d make a great VP,” or does it only become sexism when it’s a woman? I guess people saying that John Edwards was vying for the VP slot with Clinton or Obama in the lead, was unfair and sexist?

Come on… that’s just silly.

Nacho said:
Does anybody on the right really buy into anything Dick Morris says?

He says 10 interesting things a day. Half of them are obvious but he gives them a bit of perspective. The others are pure guesses. So, the question is, which of his guesses will come true?

Morris is not any smarter than you or me. I think he just spends a lot of time in Washington’s many bars and saloons, so he hears things to which we do not have access.

Ramrants said:
This is the guy who said all of 2007 and 2008 that our next president would be Hillary Clinton. Morris is never right about anything.

In June of 2007, the four leading candidates were Romney, Huckabee, Giuliani, and Fred Thompson. The pollsters had quit including questions about McCain.

So Morris is not the only one who has ever been wrong.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Romney and someone from the Mountain West in which the Republicans have been faltering so badly. Likely a nobody since Romney is so delicate.

No, because a Republican should be able to win all those states, including Colorado and Nevada and including New Mexico if it can limit voting to only eligible voters.

The story is Bachmann and the question is, How well will she play outside the Midwest? Can she win votes in New England, in Pennsylvania and Ohio and Michigan? Can she carry Virginia, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina? Who ought to be her running-mate, if she is to win New Jersey or maybe Oregon?

Glackin said:
Let’s start here. I think BOR is out of line saying Bachmann is “VP” material only, and that Cain has “no shot”.
Dismissing MB to the #2 spot smells of sexism. Every candidate is in it to win it, and should be judged on that basis.
Cain wowed the 1st debate, was weaker in this one (I thought). But he has several pluses, and time.
BOR is a known pompous @ss, and this thread shows more about him than the candidates, IMHO.

Glackin, what is the matter with you? Why are you posting something with which I can agree 100%? Bachmann, Cain this debate versus the first, and O’Reilly of course. Thumbs up for you, Glackin!

WCinWI said:
All I’ll say is that the Palin camp sees what the Romney camp is doing with the Bachmann camp and the Palin camp would be willing to throw the election against the RINOS to teach them a lesson. I have no faith in a Romney or a Bachmann. I don’t know how you excite the base. Bachmann doesn’t do it like she used to.

I usually agree with you, but I think you are fixated on Palin and not seeing the big picture.

The left-wing media has destroyed her, and there is nothing she can do in the next 12 or 18 months to rehabilitate her reputation. They’ve turned her into a caricature and not a serious person, so it does not matter that she is a real person. So I am pretty sure she will not run, and I really hope she will not run.

I do not know why you apparently object to Michele Bachmann — what is wrong with her?

As for Herman Cain… he has a great story to tell, but has not done his homework. I think the other candidates, including Rick Perry, must have noticed that just because the election will be won or lost on economic issues, candidates must know foreign policy and trade policy, domestic policy and environmental policy and even agriculture policy.

J Baustian said:
Glackin, what is the matter with you? Why are you posting something with which I can agree 100%? Bachmann, Cain this debate versus the first, and O’Reilly of course. Thumbs up for you, Glackin!

I’mnotblue asked for a frank discussion without snark.
I gave a straight assessment of the topic, which often gets lost by page three or four.
Glad you concur.

ImNotBlue said:
Are you serious? Because O’Reilly thinks that Bachmann is better suited for the VP role, you think it’s sexism? You’ve got to be joking.

Is it sexism every time a commentator says “he’d make a great VP,” or does it only become sexism when it’s a woman? I guess people saying that John Edwards was vying for the VP slot with Clinton or Obama in the lead, was unfair and sexist?

Come on… that’s just silly.

The question arose due to the source and the target.
Why did BOR single out MB as “VP material”? Why not Paul, or Cain?
Look, Newt is a dead man walking. All that is missing is the date.
Romney and Pawlenty have a strong yawn factor to overcome.
Santorum is too far out and too toxic for any ticket.
The three who bring enthusiastic crowds to their feet are MB, Cain and Paul.
But Mr. Arrogance dismisses one of the three from the top of the ticket. Why?

Glackin said:
Romney and Pawlenty have a strong yawn factor to overcome.
Santorum is too far out and too toxic for any

Romney seems much less robotic this time than last. So he has that going for him.
Santorum is very much in the mold of Jack Kemp. He is a very good man, but boring. And even if he was still in the Senate, I don’t think he’d have a chance.

I would support Cain or Bachmann.  Perry looks good too.  While I like Romney, I don’t think he is relevant anymore since he lost to another losing candidate McCain.  What I like about Bachmann and Cain is that they are highly qualified, yet non-typical white male republicans.  I think they would help break down the negative stereotypes of republicans and help get a new generation of Voters.  Image a Cain/Bachmann ticket.  First women President and first African-American Vice-President.  How are you going to stop that?

Thought we were all adults against name calling. Someone needs to grow up. I’m not a Cain supporter but come on now!!!

Because you don’t like their talking points? Go, run to CNN you’ll fit right in with the rest of them. Hahahahaaa!!!!