Vaughn is one of the few independent thinkers in Hollywood.  I really don’t care about my entertainers ideology, but it’s nice to know that there’s some diversity of opinion out there.

Dodgeball > Bruno

This is not about the political Left or the Leftists in Hollywood, it is about the Republicans and how they have lost the future of the party (the youth) by failing to be fundamentally any different than the Democrats.  Want bigger government, fewer choices and more wars?  Vote for any Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dum candidate the Republican OR Democrat establishment offers.  

Want less war, more freedom and smaller government?  Vote for something different. Vote for Paul.

I knew there was a reason I liked Vince Vaughn.

Vince Vaughn has a new fan..me.

Other well know people that support Ron Paul….please note how diverse the list really is.

Bill Maher
Andrew Napolitano
Mark Cuban
Michael Badnarik
Chuck Baldwin
Aaron Russo
Barry Goldwater, Jr.
Steve Kubby
John Stewart
Clint Eastwood

I wonder who Obama will get to support him ?  Kanye West and Lil’ Kim ?  

So where is John Mayer’s endorsement?

creeping emancipation is based on what? two people supporting a conservative? come now, you’re gonna need more than that to prove such an outlandish theory.

Note: the above comment is not racist…..right.

Actually, Dave Weigel posted video of that on his site, which I linked to above.

You forgot to add Fat Libertarian…

Re: Alec Baldwin:  https://twitter.com/#!/AlecBaldwin/status/90915389596372992

Yup.  More easy-listenin’ Patriotism  -  along with Jesus-Power.  We goin take back r country.  Goin dew it rat now – n rat cheer!!

I think you don’t care about your entertainers ideologies because they are opposite of yours; let’s just be honest here.  I think most Americans are too dumb to elect Ron Paul who I believe would be an amazing President.

Touche – Sock you just let your ignorance shine through (BIGOT) after a good point of Ron Pauls following.  Please continue to hide behind the LCD screen and shut up so you do not hamper Ron Paul’s chances at winning this election.

What will it take to get Ron Paul elected???  Perry and Romney are the front runners and I would vote for either one, but preferred… Ron Paul is my choice.

Today is a moneybomb for Constitution day.  Donate at  www.ronpaul2012.com  More importantly, vote for Ron in your GOP caucus or primary.  He needs Ron Paul delegates to win the nomination.  It varies by state, but organize for Ron.  Find other supporters.  Sign up as a volunteer and someone will probably contact you with details and information for your state:  http://www.ronpaul2012.com/sign-up-as-volunteer/

There’s always an upside: the “too dumb” are just like that because they follow the crowd. And the crowd is following Ron Paul. Intelligent people, are following Ron Paul. Once the sheep wake up to this, they will just follow the leader. In other words, they are politically irrelevant, what matters is the tireless minority. DO NOT buy into the hoax that Ron Paul can’t win. He can, and IMO, he MUST not only for the US but the world at large will benefit immensely from both the withdrawal and ending of American and NATO militarism and also the true example of liberty and freedom that America will finally set for the rest of the world. 

& Ron Paul > all the rest.

If Ron Paul went up against Obama, he would level Obama into dust with his hypocrisy and lies.  Paul wouldn’t just win, he’d win with no less then 70% of the vote.

Hope Ron Palul runs third party again this election,  he will sure pull in the far lefties away from Obama.  The dude is a raving idiot.

Hey, I’d just love it if you could take just a minute and click on the link below, it’s where the links from the following text resolve:

http://smartdatacollective.com/timoelliott/40109/analytics-terrorism

Last year, more Americans died from dog bites and lightning strikes than terrorism. You are also generally more likely to get killed by bathtubs, vending machines, and beestings than by terrorism. For the lifetime odds of dying from various causes, see this handy chart.

To put my opinion in a better perspective, I suggest you consider the public response had the government announced the “War On Bees”. After all, as more people died from beestings than from terrorism, it only makes sense that the “War On Bees” should command a commensurately larger expenditure of public funds, say maybe 2 trillion a year. Then of course, given the higher percentage killed, we should launch a 50 trillion dollar “War On Cars”.
Wait a minute, stop laughing! I’m SERIOUS. I know you say a certain amount of death is inevitable and that it’s the human condition. That’s not the point. The POINT is that we can’t get elected unless we DO SOMETHING. And the something we’re electing to do is place you all in a state of eternal fear where you will never wish to be released from the comforting chains of serfdom.

Vote Vertebrate – Ron Paul 2012!

He cant run independent.. When it comes to the election the laws on the Republican/Democrat side. When was the last independent we had for president? A whole lot of lefties are already switching republican to vote RP. Including me….. Lol

You forgot chuck norris 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGUcUuMEXVc&feature=player_detailpage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMlCf8sh0kA&feature=player_detailpage

Ron Paul is kind of dumb. He thinks if people don’t have healthcare, charities will take care of it. He’s living in some fantasy world where minorities don’t exist and somehow “the good of the people” will trump everything.

Guy is living 50 years in the past. 

Ron Paul would have been a nice idea in the 60′s or something maybe? But even then he’d just mess up everything, he would let people pollute, he would support laws against abortion, he would advocate letting businesses do whatever they want as long as “capitalism” controlled everything.

Seeing stories like this remind me that I shouldn’t get too pissy when celebrities endorse politicians I don’t like, which is pretty much the rest of Hollywood with very few exceptions. Also long as it’s just difference of opinion and there is no malice towards people who share other views, it’s no reason to enjoy their work.

Besides, they’re essentially just carved up dancing whores anyway. So who really cares what they think :-P

Except Vince Vaughn, of course. Go Ron Paul!!!

Dr. Paul has said numerous times that he wouldn’t run third party, so I wouldn’t count on it. I’m going to do my part and vote for him in the primaries.

“Ron Paul is kind of dumb. He thinks if people don’t have healthcare,
charities will take care of it. He’s living in some fantasy world where
minorities don’t exist and somehow “the good of the people” will trump
everything.”

Just because you’re a racist doesn’t mean everyone else is. Private charities already provide millions of dollars to minorities for health care.

But, if Clint Eastwood likes Ron Paul, then he’s not risking his popularity to come out.  I have never seen him do that.  I would like to see others move in a big way.  It is TIME..

I would also add that I feel it’s so important, if possible, that JUDGE NAPOLITANO begin appearing at some rallies for Dr. Paul, as well.  He loves America & champions Paul, so let’s start seeing some action outside of his show…

My husband and I are definitely going to go to VAUGHN movies….now.  :)

There are many things snowspot is unaware of. Too many things, really.

I believe that Libertarians think that the larger, more far reaching into its citizens lives,  the more threatening  it is to one’s freedom.  The freedom to do what one wants regardless of the consequences.   This is the reason, to me,  that Ron Paul said it was okay for the hypothetical man , in the reporter Wolf Blitzer’s question, not to purchase health insurance.  This is why I am not voting for Ron Paul.  In theory Libertarianism is for responsibility, choice, individual freedom.  But for people who need Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid its a matter of needing and not the luxury of choosing.   I hope Vince Vaughn and other celebs realize this.

You can take what you’d like from my comments, if labeling them racist instead of trying to think what they mean makes you happy, by all means go ahead.

What I’m saying is, in reality we do have tons of minorities that are uninsured and don’t have the support system of other Americans. 

After all, minorities are in the minority and when you’re in the minority, you’re less likely to have the connections of someone in the majority.

It’s not racist as much as it’s economics and logic. I don’t think I even mentioned a race, not sure how I’m racist, I’ll let you try to explain that (I won’t hold my breath XD)

That’s right, let me know when you want to have an adult conversation, I’ll try to show you how that works :)

Ron Paul 2012!

I love America!

Now that Mr. Vaughn has been outed as anything but a dick-sucking or ass-kissing liberal, his career in Hollywood is finished.

Also Chuck Norris!

Let me see now, how can I say this and still be polite
enough to be diplomatic? I like Vince Vaughn and I like Ron Paul, so let’s start
this way. Here is a guy who has a vast knowledge of being an actor who is
attracted to Ron Paul and his intellect of economic affairs and government
problems in general. My take on this love affair has to do with Vince hearing
Ron’s views on economic and political issues confronting our government today
which was brought about from activity of the past 30 to 40 years. These things
which created our problems that many years ago are not able to be fixed today
as they would have been fix 30 or 40 years ago because of all of the new
situations which have been injected into our world just in the past 10 years
causing a new super problem which I think Ron Paul has the knowledge to
understand there is a problem but from the views I have heard Ron Paul give to
solve today’s problem doesn’t reach quite far enough.

I believe in fix today’s problems, we must first
stabilize people’s attitudes by being sure everyone has shelter, food, clothing
and peace of mind. These things we will pay for in the form of taxes whether we
like it or not, either in the form of repairing damages done by disgruntled
people who feel they have not be treated right to the people in jail at $60,000
per year along with repairing damage done by mother nature in her various uses
of natural disasters and we can go on and on. Some Capitalist believe everyone
for himself, other more intelligent Capitalist believe in numbers and unity
there is strength and progress. The planet earth is being filled with humans at
a rapid pace and they can be organized and productive or they can be
disorganized and animalistic. We are continually seeing some other nations
around the world being animalistic. We can learn from their mistakes by
studying the choices made by their leaders.

From the past 2,000 years we have learned of two thieves
being hung on the cross with the person believed to be our creator, many of us
may ask; why two thieves? Why not two murders? Or, why not one of each?

We may never know the answer to that, but my guess would
be theft is the most active sin in any of our lives.  I was just making a point to emphasize the
vast activities of theft which includes theft, graft, corruption and all other
shenanigans which people and businesses indulge in to gain a better advantage
of acquiring wealth and happiness. This goes on continually 24/7 throughout the
world. Then we generalize which of all the government programs are financially breaking
our great America and other countries.

Here is what we need to do. It is like cleaning up the
area after yourself in the bathroom, if you don’t someone else will need to do
it for you and by that time you will need, carpenters, tile men, plumbers,
painters and all because you were careless and refused to leave things the way
you found them in a place which was in excellent condition before you got there.

Now that you get the idea, if we have a problem with
Medicare, Military Contractors, State, County, City and Federal Contractors,
employees, and Insurance Companies receiving moneys for any reason, someone
need to be responsible for proving they did what they are receiving money for
and a receipt with receivers name and other important information, besides this,
all products storage areas need be under heavy security with security practices
and receipts need be used for traceable records.

This is the beginning of stopping Theft, graft,
corruption, and embezzling practices. This system should be duplicated and
interconnected throughout all government agencies and programs.

Government programs are necessary and are not financially
killing us, the molestation of our Programs are the reasons for our Deficit. If
you cannot see this, you probably should not be holding Government Office.

Theft, graft and corruption in all their hidden forma are
breaking every country around the world and yet, not very many in the positions
to stop it are stopping it. Do we need to establish a new agency to stop the
slaughter of our Governments’ wealth to pump life into our Federal, states,
counties, cities and towns around the entire Globe? You be the judge and spread
the word on all electronic devices by demanding more security so they don’t
destroy our Federal, State and City programs. We just need to get the thieves out.
This is the killer problem.

Trying to think of a joke about Ron Paul and motorboating.  I got nothing.

No, I don’t think that is really the case.

There are plenty of people I disagree with, who I would still consider independent thinkers.   Politically I don’t agree with Kucinich on many issues, but I do recognize that he is an independent thinker.   I would also vote for him over 95% of the republicans and democrats because of it.

Meanwhile, even though some of the Republican candidates may technically atleast say they support something I do, I do not consider them independent thinkers, and I don’t support them either.

As Einstein once said – any fool can know a thing, the point is to understand.    Any fool can get up on that stage and say what they read in the polls, and what some “experts” told them to say.     Maybe many people can’t recognize it, but I do.     Because I can see in their answers that they do not understand.

When questioned, it reveals all.    When pushed, they end up going back to some sound bite their experts told them to say.    They can’t really explain their positions, because they don’t understand them.    That is what makes Ron Paul stand out.     When you put the fake next to the real thing, anyone who is informed can tell the difference.    So they have to constantly assure people – he’s the fake, he’s the kook, he’s not electable – not the others.  

So how does that have to do with a celebrity endorsement and that person directly?   Because the reason for their support – in the face of complete bias is most likely because they are seeing the same thing.   When you look at how well Ron Paul is doing, keep in mind he is doing this despite the biases, despite the constant misrepresentation.    While the other candidates are being propped up and defended as such.

I suppose in the end, we are all consumers.    It’s what you buy that makes a difference.    If you buy the bs they are selling, then that says as much about you as it does the seller.

You don’t understand how the free market works.    The biggest question right now for healthcare should not be a matter of who and who doesn’t have insurance.    The question should be – why does it cost so much that most American’s can’t afford healthcare.      And that is the issue Ron Paul is attacking.

In a free market, it would be impossible for healthcare to be this expensive.      There are 2 sides to business, you have the business and you have the customer.     If the business does not offer prices that the customer can afford, then that business will go bankrupt.     Because they have to have a customer base to service or sell the products too. 

The only way the healthcare industry can continue to post record profits year after year while losing it’s customer base due to being unaffordable is due to government programs.     These bills and laws are written basically by the lobbyists and include things for them to make money in it.    This goes toward screwing people over, or making money directly from the government.

In effect, this deregulates the free market and it doesn’t allow the free market to self regulate the prices and costs.

What Ron Paul talked about wasn’t fiction, it was fact.    It was not a theory or a fantasy word, it was history.  

Before government intervention the prices were not outrageous and as a result:

Most people could afford healthcare outright.  Not insurance, healthcare.   

It was easier for charities and organizations to make up the difference.    Even today in these increased costs you still have any organizations dedicated to helping people who can’t otherwise afford healthcare.      Lower costs and a free market allows organizations like St Judes, or the Childrens Cancer Hospitals to better do their jobs.    The money they get donated will go much further.

The fact of the matter is that if government was removed completely from the healthcare industry(outside obvious criminal acts like fraud and so forth), the people would be paying the EXACT same amount they do know WITH the government programs, if not LESS.

In 1964, before medicare, a FAMILY spent about $500 a year on healthcare – not insurance, healthcare.    And that was with visits and stays.     Inflation adjusted that’s about $3100 in todays money.     If families only had to pay $3000 a year for healthcare, don’t you think the healthcare problem wouldn’t be much of a problem?    People pay more than that today just for a single person, and not for healthcare, but for insurance.

And don’t you think charities would be much more effective?  Less people in need, less costs per person?  I think so.       Which is why, what Ron Paul said is what happened when it was on a free market.   It was not fiction, it was history.

Oh and btw, back before government programs, America was #1 in healthcare.   Today, we are #1 in terms if it being hugely more expensive in the world, while only ranking #37 in the healthcare.

So tell me again why we need to keep the status quo?    Tell me again how these programs are helping America, while the costs go up and more and more people need it?     The only fantasy world I see is this one where the poor and people of need are better off, because reality tells me it’s making it worse.

It’s always refreshing to see an A-list celebrity who refuses to be one of the sheeple and instead forms his own opinions. He doesn’t reflexively sing Obama’s praises just because 99% of his colleagues do. 

That comment he made is only racist if you take it that way. Which means your views are most likely more racist than most. BTW it is a fact that African Americans have supported Obama for purely racist reasons. Its not racist for pointing that out.

Ron Paul believes that in a economically well off society, immigration would literally be no problem.  And although our economy couldn’t support it right now, as soon as he was able to get in office and get the ball rolling we’d be back on track in no time.  You should look further into his view of immigration and its relation to our economy

hey dipshit I’m a chikasha Indian and I get free gov heath care and they pay some of my bills just because I’m a minority

Snowspot, labelling someone dumb is not good rhetoric. Immature at best. Stick with the issues.

The most minor of minorities is the individual. If you protect the individual, you protect everybody. If you protect groups, some other group must miss out. That’s why I support Ron Paul, because he understands the classic meaning of ‘rights’. Rights do not entail obligations, if they do, you know someone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes. If healthcare is a right, someone else is forced (obligated) to provide it. This is not how a free society works. 

No system be it free or government managed is perfect, but I’ll vote for any system whereby 51% of people can never twist my arm or break my leg. The only system that can provide that protection for the individual is a republic where the rule of law reign supreme and is based on real ‘rights’.

You infer that if people who don’t have healthcare have to rely on charities as some fantasy world. There are many church hospitals still in existence today, despite government meddling, that provides medical care for those that cannot afford it. Even in today’s government autocracy where medicaid is provided people still miss out. Where do you think they get there healthcare?… charities and where possible family assistance. This is how a free society works.

The good of the people will trump everything when you open your mind to the ideas of liberty and true freedom. Right now you are only hindering yourself. 

You need to get you facts right. Ron Paul is pro life. He applies a strict understanding of property rights, which means pollution is anathema to him. He would let individuals and businesses do whatever they wanted as long as no one else is hurt, this is why he voted against the bail outs. Property rights would have told him that bailing out the banks only serve to hurt the poor and middle class. Capitalism does not control anything. Control implies a will behind it, only people can move with willfull behaviour. If you do not want one individual or a small minority of individuals to control everything, then you must fight for the cause of liberty. Real capitalism is the only social model that is in agreement with liberty. Real capitalism would have let the banks go bust. Real capitalism does not facilitate the FED to print money thereby stealing by stealth the wealth of everyone else.

Ron Paul is an important messenger of a very powerful idea, this idea would have been right in the 60′s and would still be right today. It is a timeless idea. An idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any one individual or government. The idea is liberty and freedom.

And one last thing, utopia is where you find yourself in when you are ignorant of the facts.

Fennel, you are only half correct. Liberty is to do want one wants as long as no one else is hurt. There is nothing wrong if people do not purchase health insurance. Some people are quite happy to pay market rates for healthcare. Maybe they can get cheaper healthcare overseas… who knows and we should not judge. 

In today’s world, people who need welfare have become dependent on it based on false pre-tenses. Even if you are blind to Ron Paul’s moral argument, eventually he will win the argument based on simple economics. The checks from Washington will one day either bounce or become worthless, tell me what will you be able to buy then. You might not even be able to put food on the table. Americans owned a whopping 14.5 trillions dollars to creditors!!!

There is a very easy way to annihilate a culture, it might take a few decades but its very effective. They call it genocide by welfare.

There is just one slight logical problem with your arguments. 

Governments cannot give without first taking. There is a word for it. Its called Theft.

Jim Rogers
David Stockman
Peter Schiff
Daniel Hannan

When I have been unemployed I gambled. I did not have health insurance. That was my choice. Nobody forced me not to buy health insurance. I have a friend that broke his back in a snowmobile accident. He did not have insurance. He gambled and lost. The thing is, he did still receive care! He may be destitute for the rest of his life but he was treated and will live a normal healthy life. Here is the biggest problem with government health care… Government screws everything up. 

Well, after all, Libertarianism is the party of Reason.  Unlike the liberal, Socialist  kool-aid drinkers of the Democratic party and the expansionist, war-mongering neo-con Republicans, Libertarians believe in the right of the people to their autonomy as provided by the founders.

US citizens donate on average more than $300 billion per year to charity.

The US government only gives $250 billion in “charity” (medicare+others). Granted I did not include social security but that is not charity it’s a poorly run investment scheme (you get a tiny portion of your own money back).

Also, if the US government stopped being involved in charity, naturally healthcare would still be given to the poor and suffering. You are forgetting the vast majority of hospitals are church-run or formerly church-run organizations. Haven’t you seen all the “St. John’s” or St. this or that’s in their names?

Those church hospitals don’t give out free healthcare because there is no need: they can give it for free and the US government will give them billions of dollars to do it!  The US government also cuts out the patient from negotiating prices which causes costs to skyrocket. The US government also has a STRICT licensing program for doctors and super-costly regulations that makes being a doctor an expensive enterprise. Tort reform would go a long way in lowering costs as well.

Clint Eastwood is a libertarian and said he liked Ron Paul.  His career ain’t over… by far…

you my friend are a person that hasn’t given up hope for true change and will probably be one of those hurt when your country crashes. You’ll all be wishing you chose someone with a brain and a sense for the people. 

Don’t forget, without medicare Americans might get off their ass to work *what a shock*

You speak none sense. i don’t even know why I finished reading your opinion but DO research on your fellow candidates inlcuding Obama. Tell me the results. Don’t look for biased articles, or vids or even webpages. Look thoroughly and you’ll find a whole different section about the “reality” America is facing. You my friend just go by word of mouth, or what FOX or CNN would tell you. You’re too lazy to go and research yourself that you would have someone else do it for you without understanding the whole thing!

me,too!

i dont care, quite honestly, that some people dont have health care. Its not my problem. If we stopped handing them free stuff, maybe they’d get an effin job…