““anti-abortion, anti-masturbation, anti-premarital-sex, anti-stem-cells, anti-gay-marriage, dubious-about-evolution Christian conservative””

That along with “anti-deficits” sums up the platform of the Tea Party.

You go, Christine!!!

Karl isn’t the boss of you.

Christine is charming enough to whisk away the dirt that is shoved her way . Every dame is a little wacky , especially when they’re young . The Delaware voter can sort out the positions each candidate takes . It looks like Coons may have more issues than National Geographic . Delaware will sort it out ,see ?

I hate these concern-trolls who are so befuddled and bewildered about the interest of the media in a race that is to be decidedly exclusively by the Delaware voters.

What about the million plus dollars of out-of-state money raised by the tea party to influence the outcome of the Delaware race? Where is your fu******** concern for that..

This Rove-Palin-O’Donnell side show is completely entertaining. She is taking on the GOP bull dog. Great for ratings

““I was in high school, how many of you didn’t hang out with questionable folks in high school?”

I’m sure that’s exactly what those witches are saying about you now.

They are probably pretty embarrassed they ever knew you and are relegating it to youthful folly.

O’Donnell is taking the right approach here. If the accusation is no better than a joke, respond with a joke. On the other hand, if opponents want to debate issues — which seems to be the one thing the mainstream media doesn’t want to do in during this campaign season — then (even better) debate the issues.

If the media wasn’t corrupt and biased, this election would allow us to have a public dialogue on the role and scope of government. But all indications are that CNN, CBS, MSNBC, ABC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, etc. are determined to avoid any substantive discussion of key issues during this campaign. Instead we get to talk about witchcraft and masturbation…..So O’Donnell is right to laugh off these diversionary tactics.

I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA.

Big_F-ing_Deal said:
I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA. I HAVE AN EXCUSE FOR EVERYTHING – LAMESTREAM MEDIA.

If it’s lame the first time, repeating it doesn’t make you sound any smarter.

I rather have a senator that dabbled in witchcraft than one who dabbled in Marxism .

I’m really trying to get a handle on what’s happening with the Republican/Teabagger movement. Since there is a little bit of intelligent dialogue on this website, I’d like to throw out this question. How on earth can you support such backward people? We already have enough dunderheads in Congress. People like Imhofe who can’t understand the obvious situation with global warming; people like Boehner who would destroy America in order to carry out the ‘conservative’ agenda; people like Bachmann, Demint and, possibly, Palin and Gingrich and dozens of others, mostly Republicans, who either don’t believe in any government outside of the military and highways, and have no smarts or common sense asides from skills at grabing power. And now we have O’Donnell with her screwy sense of morality and personal finances, and great need for fame and fortune. On a personal level she, like Geo Bush might be a very nice person, but she is not qualified to be in any position of power. Is your hatred or dislike of Obama and all he stands for so great that you are taking leave of your senses in supporting these characters and what they stand for. What do they stand for? The Free Enterprise System which we all support since it is the only system that works, but it has to be regulated and run fairly. As far as having a thought out program about what needs to be done the Republicans don’t have a clue asides from scaling down social security and health care and lower and lower taxes and being belligerant and angry with the world. We live in a very complex society and we desperately need good government run by people who know what’s happening in the world and know how to conduct themselves in it. Your rightwing politicos for the most part don’t have a clue and if Bush and the current crop are any examples, you still want to take us backwards. We already are falling behind many other nations, but I understand your fear and anger-it’s tough times for most of us. I’m 73 and I’d like to say, especially to older people that this is a time to think things through and not take, childish, selfish actions.

Big Eddie said:
Every dame is a little wacky , especially when they’re young .

Since you want to stereotype….I guess we can assume she is getting a pass on her past and present indiscretions because some of the men are using the wrong brain.

“she is getting a pass on her past and present indiscretions”

As long as she votes to stop the progressives, nothing else matters.

So far both quitter Palin and her little munchin have shown how much they hate men. Now being a feminist myself I don’t think I ever hated men and wouldn’t insult them just to win an election. Mr. Rove is a poor excuse for a human being but I wonder if she talked to him the way Palin and O’Cracker tells them to buck up and put your man pants on what would people do if he turned around and said something sexist to those two. Palin has been a cancer on this country and now it is spread. Let’s all hope that smarter heads will prevail in Delware. People need to wake up and realize this isn’t just a movement to get conservatives in. It is also a movement to get the religious right to have a foot hold and take over the party. The republicans have allowed this to happen and lets home some smart republicans will clean their mess up. The republicans hated Obama more than they hated the country and now the country is paying for it. Shame on McCain and the republican party for allowing it to get this far. You knew exactly what they were doing. You let the monster out of the bag. Sarah wasn’t happy enough to destroy Wallisa leaving them a debt now she wants more power. Watch out for what you pray for.

These Republican women are real sweethearts. As far as you men go I can understand why you like Palin and her latest whack-job. Both attractive and personable. I have not heard any of you name any specific qualifications for either one.

I love it that Republicans wants women all to stay in the dark ages. Especially you “old” white guys that don’t want women to do anything but cook,clean and take care of kids. OUR BODIES ARE NOT OUR OWN and you like it that way. Oh my goodness the thought of women being ok with masterbation and not even needing a man for an organism. How terrible.

Now you all can jump on me lor better just ignore me. Either way I have said how I see things. The Dems don’t have the answer to many things either but at least they let people make up their own minds. To me that is freedom.

You notice O’Donald says she went to high school, not that she graduated. If it weren’t for her opposition to pre-marital sex, she’d be close enough to the Drop Out Governor to be her daughter.

Moderate said:
“she is getting a pass on her past and present indiscretions” As long as she votes to stop the progressives, nothing else matters.

That’s exactly what Germans said in 1932.

Moderate said:
“she is getting a pass on her past and present indiscretions” As long as she votes to stop the progressives, nothing else matters.

That is a real sick way to look at. Anyone even a r\total whack-job will do. What in the world do you think these people are going tro get done when they get tro DC??? Do you really think McConnel and the “Boner” will let them take over. Ain’t gonna happen. You betcha. O’Donnell will have to resort to her witchcraft on those to. One thing I can say ks that kt will make great fun to watch. Come on SNL.

O’Donnell could care less about actually winning a Senate seat.It’s what her former campaign staff said that a TV gig and making money is issue #1.She will lose and lose badly.That she is turning into a national joke is unimportant because enough stupid fucking teabaggers will part with there money just as they did for Palin,Gingrich and Beck to listen to another rightwing wackjob.Stupid sells.

murf said:
I rather have a senator that dabbled in witchcraft than one who dabbled in Marxism .

Many intelligent people dabbled in leftist politics when they were in college. It is largely positive. It reaffirms the value of capitalism by questioning it. When you reach that inevitable conclusion that there is some tie between free markets and individual freedoms, you have the zeal of a convert, but it is an informed belief. Much stronger than blockheads who never question, or worse, are fearful of questioning. That’s the rub, isn’t it? People who never question are expressing a fear that the system they blindly espose cannot stand up to scrutiny. It diminishes the system.

Of course, O’Donald only “went” to college, so she never had the opportunity for this epiphany.

As for witchcraft, it is merely an indicia of nuttiness. I frankly don’t much care, but I do think there is something whacky about a teen who has finds masturbation a great evil, and witchcraft sort of thrilling. If O’Donald were a guy, I’d lock up “my” women.

On the whole, I think our Republic could withstand an uneducated frigid witch, but I think it could also do better.

chucken said:
O’Donnell could care less about actually winning a Senate seat.It’s what her former campaign staff said that a TV gig and making money is issue #1.She will lose and lose badly.That she is turning into a national joke is unimportant because enough stupid fucking teabaggers will part with there money just as they did for Palin,Gingrich and Beck to listen to another rightwing wackjob.Stupid sells.

I suspect you’re correct. Beckerhead, the Drop Out Governor and the Non-Masturbating Witch believe in nothing but themselves.

The ignorant are always loud in argument . …See much of above .

“All of life is but a stage”

Big Eddie said:
The ignorant are always loud in argument . …See much of above .

Even the largely informed can be both certain and wrong…

Christine who? Most likely a liberal plant like those evil progressives who did all the Obama is Hitler,Stalin,Karl Marx(not Karl Rove !!) signs at the teabagger Whitestock rallys.The crazy meter is shooting smoke and her supporters will of course blame the left for what will be one of the greatest political flameouts in history.And yes all who thought she was not batshit crazy have been recorded for posterity.

Ganymede said:> Since there is a little bit of intelligent dialogue on this website, …

Who told you that?

I have a question. If there are 293,000 registered Democrats in Deleware and 183,000 registered Republicans, and O’Donnell got a total of 30,000 votes to beat Mike Castle, does anyone here really think she’s going to beat Coons? And what happened to the other 153,000 registered Republicans who didn’t vote for her in the Primary?

Fox News: We proudly pander to Teabaggers said:
I hate these concern-trolls who are so befuddled and bewildered about the interest of the media in a race that is to be decidedly exclusively by the Delaware voters.

What about the million plus dollars of out-of-state money raised by the tea party to influence the outcome of the Delaware race? Where is your fu******** concern for that..

You should see if you can get your money back from Ned Lamont.

Oh, and do any of you think this might be the reason that she’s now ducking the media?

CNN
O’Donnell’s Spending ‘Illegal’

The spotlight is now on Christine O’Donnell, the 41-year-old Sarah Palin-endorsed upset winner of Delaware’s GOP Senate primary, and from the looks of it, it ain’t pretty. O’Donnell is currently being targeted by a watchdog group claiming the Tea Partier abused campaign funds for personal use and made false statements on forms she filed with the Federal Elections Commission. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which earlier in the year scrutinized Charlie Rangel, filed a complaint to the U.S. Attorney’s office in Delaware and the Federal Elections Commission alleging that O’Donnell illegally spent more than $20,000 in 2009 and 2010. “It turns out Miss O’Donnell has treated her campaign funds like they are her very own personal piggy bank,” said Melanie Sloan, the group’s executive director. “She’s used that money to pay for things like her rent, for gas, meals, and even a bowling outing. And that’s just flat-out illegal.” Much of these campaign expenses were made in 2009, when O’Donnell was not a candidate for anything. Representatives for O’Donnell could not be reached for comment. The Daily Beast’s Benjy Sarlin reported earlier this week that O’Donnell paid her mother $3,500 for consulting on her last campaign.

While you ponder that and try to figure out the math in my first coment, I’m going to bed!

murf said:
That’s exactly what Germans said in 1932.

did you read the marxist story?

murf said:
I rather have a senator that dabbled in witchcraft than one who dabbled in Marxism .

oops
did you read the marxist story?

roxsteady said:
Oh, and do any of you think this might be the reason that she’s now ducking the media?

CNN
O’Donnell’s Spending ‘Illegal’

The spotlight is now on Christine O’Donnell, the 41-year-old Sarah Palin-endorsed upset winner of Delaware’s GOP Senate primary, and from the looks of it, it ain’t pretty. O’Donnell is currently being targeted by a watchdog group claiming the Tea Partier abused campaign funds for personal use and made false statements on forms she filed with the Federal Elections Commission. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which earlier in the year scrutinized Charlie Rangel, filed a complaint to the U.S. Attorney’s office in Delaware and the Federal Elections Commission alleging that O’Donnell illegally spent more than $20,000 in 2009 and 2010. “It turns out Miss O’Donnell has treated her campaign funds like they are her very own personal piggy bank,” said Melanie Sloan, the group’s executive director. “She’s used that money to pay for things like her rent, for gas, meals, and even a bowling outing. And that’s just flat-out illegal.” Much of these campaign expenses were made in 2009, when O’Donnell was not a candidate for anything. Representatives for O’Donnell could not be reached for comment. The Daily Beast’s Benjy Sarlin reported earlier this week that O’Donnell paid her mother $3,500 for consulting on her last campaign.

While you ponder that and try to figure out the math in my first coment, I’m going to bed!

——————-

“Donors to CREW include such liberal groups as George Soros’ Open Society Institute, Democracy Alliance, Service Employees International Union, the Arca Foundation, and the Gill Foundation.[6][12][13] The Roll Call article also stated that the CREW mission statement had changed since 2005, when it read that CREW “differs from other good government groups in that it sues offending politicians directly” and that it “aims to counterbalance the conservative legal watchdog groups that made such a strong impact over the past decade.”"

Well, since the 11 year old had to go to bed, here is the answer…. this watchdog group – just happens to be a George Soros front. Gee, do you think they might be biased and not worth a piece of crap? How about they go after their friends like Maxine Waters or that pillar of honesty, just re-elected Charley Rangel? by the way, do you thing Charley Rangel just might have committed some really criminal things for big, big bucks? yet, he is going to be re-elected…. on purely racial reasons… so, which is the racist group?

philipjames said:
this watchdog group – just happens to be a George Soros front. Gee, do you think they might be biased and not worth a piece of crap? How about they go after their friends like Maxine Waters or that pillar of honesty, just re-elected Charley Rangel? by the way, do you thing Charley Rangel just might have committed some really criminal things for big, big bucks? yet, he is going to be re-elected…. on purely racial reasons… so, which is the racist group?

and another group is funded by the koch brothers and not worth a piece of crap
anyone who thinks Rangel should stay is another idiot
and here we go with the racist stuff again
can ya hold that stuff for a racist thread?

ganymede said:
How on earth can you support such backward people? We already have enough dunderheads in Congress.

Look at who they’re running against.

roxsteady said:
I have a question. If there are 293,000 registered Democrats in Deleware and 183,000 registered Republicans, and O’Donnell got a total of 30,000 votes to beat Mike Castle, does anyone here really think she’s going to beat Coons? And what happened to the other 153,000 registered Republicans who didn’t vote for her in the Primary?

I surely don’t know. Maybe this fellow could shed some light on the situation.

“And that’s just flat-out illegal.”

What is one more Christian politician in violation of the 10 commandments?

P.S.
If you want to read something funny, check out the exchange between Teabaggin4Jesus and RevPettibone at The Daily Beast. I think it may be our old pal Ralph from TvNewser.

Here is the linke
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-sheet/item/orsquodonnellrsquos-spending-lsquoflat-out-illegalrsquo/shady-finances/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

chucken said:
Christine who? Most likely a liberal plant like those evil progressives who did all the Obama is Hitler,Stalin,Karl Marx(not Karl Rove !!) signs at the teabagger Whitestock rallys.The crazy meter is shooting smoke and her supporters will of course blame the left for what will be one of the greatest political flameouts in history.And yes all who thought she was not batshit crazy have been recorded for posterity.

Aha! Revenge for Alvin Greene. I like it.

@dandmb50 – Same old, same old. We get it here in politics too, people are so pissed at the current team in power they vote for none of the above, except in Alaska where supposedly ,you can just add a name (but make sure the spelling is right) if you don’t like the choices. How dumb is that?
The people of Delaware didn’t have much of a choice, but they sure picked a real winner.
But then, so did America when they gave GeorgeW his second term.
People get whatever they want no matter where you live.

Daniel .. Toronto, CANADA
http://bit.ly/9z6bRuCNN

Nice try sweetheart but, donors to CREW have nothing to do with the Science that is math or the misappropriation fo funds that this grifter has been practicing. So, I’m right then, that this dumpy looking nut job with the old lady pouch and double chin hasn’t got a chance in hell of winning. Good night dumbass!

By the way, the guy she’s running against is a graduate of Amherst College, Harvard Law School and Harvard Divinity School. So, he’s got all of that book learnin that wingnuts and teabaggers despise because they couldn’t make it out of vocational school! Ta Ta!

From a wag at The Agitator:

Since when did making crazy, nonsensical public statements in the heat of a political campaign become a disqualification for a Senate seat held by Joe Biden for three decades?

Aside from the fact that the O’Donnell statements are much older than this campaign, that could be the best final word on the topic. It won’t be, of course, but it could.

roxsteady said:
By the way, the guy she’s running against is a graduate of Amherst College, Harvard Law School and Harvard Divinity School. So, he’s got all of that book learnin that wingnuts and teabaggers despise because they couldn’t make it out of vocational school! Ta Ta!

Divinity school? So he’s a raging Godbotherer. He’ll totally snag the Tea Party vote, eh?

The contrast between the two parties couldn’t be more pronounced. Tonight I saw one group on TV talking about unemployment, deficits, taxes, the economy, foreign policy, etc. The other side was full of scorn and arrogance, but never got any deeper than attacking a candidate’s views on witchcraft, masturbation and psychics. What a striking contrast!

It’s easy to see which of the two groups will have success with voters.

Not to offend any residents of the state, but all this drama amounts to is the scene in Wayne’s World’s where our hero and Garth try to sell Delaware as a good vacation spot.

The Real Royal King said:
That’s exactly what Germans said in 1932.

Godwin’s law.

Can she wiggle her nose and make Obama & the Congress disappear?

She has got it all wrong.

She should be telling everyone she thought all these witches were friendly because she grew up watching Bewitched.

Civil War is brewing in the Republican camp. Christie told Karl to stick his head where the sun don’t shine and so when Karl started talking about Christie’s range of legitimate problems Rush got mad. So not to offend the Boss Karl bowed down to Rush. Pull up a chair and get out the popcorn because its going to be a grand salami.

Big Eddie said:
Christine is charming enough to whisk away the dirt that is shoved her way . Every dame is a little wacky , especially when they’re young . The Delaware voter can sort out the positions each candidate takes . It looks like Coons may have more issues than National Geographic . Delaware will sort it out ,see ?

Big Eddie if the Democrats had this much baggage you would be jumping up and down and pissing all over self.

“It turns out Miss O’Donnell has treated her campaign funds like they are her very own personal piggy bank,” said Melanie Sloan, the group’s executive director. “She’s used that money to pay for things like her rent, for gas, meals, and even a bowling outing. And that’s just flat-out illegal.”

The statement would be true if you substituted “Drop Out Governor” for “Randi Witch”.

roxsteady said:
By the way, the guy she’s running against is a graduate of Amherst College, Harvard Law School and Harvard Divinity School. So, he’s got all of that book learnin that wingnuts and teabaggers despise because they couldn’t make it out of vocational school! Ta Ta!

That’s 3 1/2 degrees too many! He’s just a smarty pants, and he might serve his full term!

felixw said:
The contrast between the two parties couldn’t be more pronounced. Tonight I saw one group on TV talking about unemployment, deficits, taxes, the economy, foreign policy, etc. The other side was full of scorn and arrogance, but never got any deeper than attacking a candidate’s views on witchcraft, masturbation and psychics. What a striking contrast! It’s easy to see which of the two groups will have success with voters.

Have you been watching O’Cavuto and O’Hannity again?

“Christine, a little dab’ll do ya,“

welcome to: http://be t t erwholesaler.us

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoex,

Big Eddie said:
Christine is charming enough to whisk away the dirt that is shoved her way . Every dame is a little wacky , especially when they’re young . The Delaware voter can sort out the positions each candidate takes . It looks like Coons may have more issues than National Geographic . Delaware will sort it out ,see ?

roxsteady said:
By the way, the guy she’s running against is a graduate of Amherst College, Harvard Law School and Harvard Divinity School. So, he’s got all of that book learnin that wingnuts and teabaggers despise because they couldn’t make it out of vocational school! Ta Ta!

Not sure why all the thumbs down on this. Seems perfectly true. Isn’t anti-intellectualism a proud mark of the Tea Party?

MrAut said:
Not sure why all the thumbs down on this. Seems perfectly true. Isn’t anti-intellectualism a proud mark of the Tea Party?

No. Unless you consider liberty anti-intellectual.

Yoda002 said:
Big Eddie if the Democrats had this much baggage you would be jumping up and down and pissing all over self.

They’re running a self-proclaimed Marxist. That stands to have a far more significant impact on my life and yours than whether Sabrina the Teenage Witch diddles herself in her later years.

The ignorance swirls about her. She makes money. The country descends and no one with a voice cares – or are worse unheard. We all fall like stars from the sky. Palin and Beck are millionaires. But somewhere, years from now, we huddle – liberal and conservative alike – and ask how did this happen?

MrAut said:
Not sure why all the thumbs down on this. Seems perfectly true. Isn’t anti-intellectualism a proud mark of the Tea Party?

It’s a puzzlement, isn’t it? The Tea Partiers are very sensitive about their lack of education.

Moderate said:
“she is getting a pass on her past and present indiscretions”

As long as she votes to stop the progressives, nothing else matters.

Well isn’t that a democratic citizen for you.

Careful, Christine, you keep dissing Emperor Palpatine and he’ll sic Darth Vader on you.

The Real Royal King said:
That’s 3 1/2 degrees too many! He’s just a smarty pants, and he might serve his full term!

Nice Palin jab there.

King, you do realize it’s O’Donnell and not O’Donald, don’t you. Maybe you’re confusing her with Rosie O’Donald. LOL

felixw said:
Tonight I saw one group on TV talking about unemployment, deficits, taxes, the economy, foreign policy, etc

But did they have a plan on how to fix it?

MrAut said:
Not sure why all the thumbs down on this. Seems perfectly true. Isn’t anti-intellectualism a proud mark of the Tea Party?

I know you prefer MSNBC, which Rachel Maddow is trying to turn into an acronym for Masturbation Stories by NBC. But I stick with the channel that covers issues like the economy, deficits, taxes, unemployment and foreign policy. You know, the boring stuff that doesn’t get discussed on your favorite channel.

MiddleRoader said:
But did they have a plan on how to fix it?

You wouldn’t know if you watch CNN and MSNBC because they will never ask any tea party attendee any questions about deficits, unemployment, the economy, etc. I wonder why Democrats are so afraid of discussing those issues.

Can you IMAGINE if this was a DEMOCRAT

HEADS WOULD BE EXPLODING

And I guess the Witch Doctor signs we had seen at TP Rallies with Obama on it can be replaced with O’DOnnell’s mug, and not only it no longer be RACIST, but it would be partially ACCURATE

zumpano said:
HEADS WOULD BE EXPLODING

Yeah, the MSM sure did run with the reverend Wright thing, didn’t they buddy?

Yeah, Pap Smear. I remember that non-story being exploited on the news during the election.

If you’re implying that the MSM didn’t cover it; then why did Obama need to come out and give his now-classic speech on Race?

Also, if Fox is #1; they’re the MSM.

zumpano said:
Yeah, Pap Smear. I remember that non-story being exploited on the news during the election.

On Hannity & Limbaugh? The only MSM coverage were diversions and mocking conservatives for wanting to make it a big deal. Furthermore, do you think that the Wright thing was not a big deal? Tell you what, I’d trust a person who played witch as a teenager long before I’d trust a person who, as an adult, sat in a racist, anti-American liberation theology church for twenty years.

Yeeeeah, Obama had to address the matter in a MAJOR speech only because Hannity and Limbaugh were talking about it.

WHATEVER

LOLS ABOUND

FOX IS MSM or LSM as you put it

You kids crack me up. Liberals own nine tenths of the news media, practically all of the entertainment industry, and most of what kids sponge up into their little noggins in public schools and universities. Yet Obama had to come out and denounce his “mentor” and lie about his church beliefs because Hannity was talking about it. Yes, that’s correct, Hannity and LImbaugh drove most of that. An example of how impotent the MSM has become. No one trusts them anymore. Those of us who pay taxes, anyway, something you might have to do someday, junior.

She is a reasonable voice in an unreasonable world!

Palin for Pres. O’Donnell for Vice Pres. that is what will save the country!!! Easter Bunny, say hi to Santa Claus for me!

What crack pot tea sagger, has the right to decide if Obama lies about his church beliefs? Who are these pompous asses? YOU KIDS CRACK ME UP ! You hate filled racist ,lying clowns make me glad that all you have is Fox and Fiends, spin , spin , spin all the way home!

I also have ghosts in my house and O’Donnell is coming to pray them or put a spell on them!

timcajun said:
Palin for Pres. O’Donnell for Vice Pres. that is what will save the country!!! Easter Bunny, say hi to Santa Claus for me!

What crack pot tea sagger, has the right to decide if Obama lies about his church beliefs? Who are these pompous asses? YOU KIDS CRACK ME UP ! You hate filled racist ,lying clowns make me glad that all you have is Fox and Fiends, spin , spin , spin all the way home!

I also have ghosts in my house and O’Donnell is coming to pray them or put a spell on them!

Whoa, settle down pal, you’re going to have an aneurysm or sumpin… :)

And by the way, I have every right to decide if Obama’s lying, and I have decided that, when faced with the fact that he attended a racist, anti-American church for twenty years without flinching, there are three possibilities:

1) He’s so stupid that he didn’t know what his “mentor” was preaching. This isn’t remotely likely.

2) He’s a racist, anti-American pig, and attended that church for that reason. This is quite likely.

3) He sat in that church because it was politically prudent to endear himself to a bunch of racist, anti-American minorities in Chicago’s south side. This is also quite likely

Obama sat in this church for twenty years with zero problem, and whether the answer is #2 or #3, or more likely a mix of the two, he is still an anti-American racist.

Summary: I’m right, you know I’m right, but being a not-so-bright progressive who can see the writing on the wall, you stomp your feet and and resort to the “racist” thing, what a hoot! Sorry junior, you progressives have rendered the term “racist” so meaningless that it’s sort of a badge. It means you lose.

I feel bad that I lost. Thanks for the judgement. I really didn’t know what to do before you pointed that out! By the way you used racist four times, what does that mean! I wouldn’t understand, I’m a not so bright progressive. Junior has to get ready for bed now.

timcajun said:
By the way you used racist four times, what does that mean! I wouldn’t understand

I’ll explain: Since you’re a progressive, you use the term as a way to admit losing a debate. When I call Obama a racist, it’s because he’s a racist.

Wow, you really do believe you are right all the time! Let me understand this, whatever you say is right because you say so! By those rules you can’t lose. Well done!

timcajun said:
Wow, you really do believe you are right all the time!

Thing is, when you’re debating a progressive, it’s pretty hard to be wrong! :)

Again, you really do believe you are right all the time,not by facts, but by “hey its you”! Since you need this , you are great, you are wonderful, boy are you are correct on all subjects, with no mistakes. Hows that?