Newsweek’s Jon Meacham: Dick Cheney For President In 2012


dick-cheneyWe’re really starting this already, huh? We’ve heard plenty about Mrs. Sarah Palin’s plans three years from now — not to mention her potential running mates, from Glenn Beck to Liz Cheney. Now, Newsweek chief and Mediaite Power Grid #1 magazine editor Jon Meacham is utilizing his pot-stirring big spoon to serve up a new name: Dick Cheney in 2012. Is he serious or seriously “trolling for traffic,” as suggested by Salon’s Glenn Greenwald.

Let’s consider Meacham’s initially dubious case, which he spells out in a Newsweek article online now, “Why Dick Cheney Should Run in 2012,” to be published in the December 7th issue of the magazine. He begins:

  • “[A] run would be good for the Republicans and good for the country.” Insert joke: “The sound you just heard in the background was liberal readers spitting out their lattes.”
  • Greenwald? “Jon Meacham tells a funny, original joke: liberals react to his column urging Cheney to run by “spitting out their lattes,” on Twitter. Burn. Get it? Coffee.

Good for the country, you say, Mr. Meacham. Why?

  • “Because Cheney is a man of conviction, has a record on which he can be judged, and whatever the result, there could be no ambiguity about the will of the people.”

Nonpartisan evidence  – good start. Then:

  • “Three years out, the GOP field does not offer a putative nominee.”
  • “In an era of ideological purity within the party, Cheney is among the purest; no one can question his conservative credentials on national security, and his record in the House and as vice president places him beyond reproach from the base.”

But! “He was, it is true, second in command in years of great deficit spending…” So, kind of, Meacham admits. And:

  • “A campaign would also give us an occasion that history denied us in 2008: an opportunity to adjudicate the George W. Bush years in a direct way.”
  • I’ll take Glenn Greenwald for 140 characters, Alex: “It’s unclear to Jon Meacham what Americans think of Bush — the 2006 and 2008 elections, and humiliating poll numbers, are very ambiguous.”

Lastly:

  • “Cheney’s memoirs are due to be published—and thus due to be promoted—in the spring of 2011, not long before the caucuses and primaries begin. I’ll bet you that the Barnes & Noble in Des Moines (there’s a big one at The Shoppes at Three Fountains) is on the book tour.”

Or, as Greg Sargent of The Plum Line put it: Drudgebait. That is, a purposefully counterintuitive online argument meant to get the attention of Big Matt and run up website traffic. Gotta get those pageviews!

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


9 comments

  • TfT TfT says:

    I haven’t heard anything about Palin’s plans three years from now, in fact, every interview I have seen she has said she is thinking about 2010 and not 2012…..so the opening line of this article is kind of made up. The stuff in between the first and last line is not really read-worthy. But the last line is the kicker….and I would guess that Matt is a heck of a lot smarter than Meechum. Matt is at least highlighting the climategate stuff that this board is ignoring along with most other media. Although George Stephanopolous did mention it on his show this morning. The Mad Magazine article is being highlighted here? LOL. Based on the amount of attention Mrs. Palin gets on this board, clearly she is THE PERSON OF THE YEAR.

    “Hide the deline”

  • Lex Wadelski Lex Wadelski says:

    Almost unbelievable!

    I agree that Meacham must be trolling for page views… or else hoping to leach away readers from National Review and The Week .

    The “new” Newsweek has a odiferous conservative bent. Except for its token liberal, Jonathan Alter.

  • Facebook User says:

    On Fox News, Karl Rove did his best Cheney impression to say that Cheney will not run in 2012:
    http://www.gotchamediablog.com/2009/11/karl-rove-does-dick-cheney-impression.html

  • Puter Boi Puter Boi says:

    Not too surprised to see the name Jon Meacham and troll….or trolling in the same sentence.

  • straitshooter straitshooter says:

    Meacham will slap Newsweek’s name on any sideshow to keep the magazine from foundering. They have sacrificed credibility and objectivity in hopes of being a conversation starter. Unfortunately, the conversation always starts this way: “Did you see the new cover of Newsweek? God they suck.”

    Here’s an idea: Break a story once in a while. Be the first to uncover information about something that actually matters.

  • And just think people, Newsweek pays Meacham a salary and all. Not bad for someone who is really stupid and offers nothing of substance in his columns. God, where can I get a job like this!

  • Sunnyr Sunnyr says:

    It doesn’t matter who runs against this incompetent bunch of bozo’s in 3 years. Republicans could run a frickin’ Door Knob and beat the corrupt goofball in the White House! The American people have just about had it with this ACORN COMMUNITY ORGANIZER and his corrupt SEIU buddies!

  • DICKERSON3870 DICKERSON3870 says:

    See Dick run!
    “Pricky Dick” Cheney ‘12

  • TheIdiotWatch TheIdiotWatch says:

    Is Meacham not the same IDIOT who nominated Mike Bloomberg for President on the cover of LOSEWEEK in late 2007? To quote him:

    Bloomberg “is seriously considering whether to make history in March by announcing an independent campaign for president—a campaign in which he would be willing to spend $1 billion of his own money (his estimated net worth is roughly $13 billion).”

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    SI Swimsuit Cover: Brooklyn Decker Joins Illustrious Pantheon, Tweets About It

    Ladies and gentlemen — eh, who are we kidding, gentlemen — your Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue 2010 Cover Model: Brooklyn Decker! As has become something of a tradition, the announcement was made on the Late Show with David Letterman, which broadcast the unveiling of a giant nearly-naked billboard in Times Square. Decker has additional SI heft by marriage: her husband is tennis star Andy Roddick. Wow, too bad their babies will be so ugly.

    NYC Tabloids Will Have A Paterson Scandal No Matter What!

    New York was promised a government sex scandal, dammit, and we better well get one! At least if the New York City tabloids have anything to do with it. Apparently not satisfied with the news that the New York Times has only a sort of mediocre scandal to report in their much-gossiped about upcoming David Paterson profile, the tabloids have taken it upon themselves to stir up as much "chaos" as possible.



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS