There you go again. I just watched the segment. Coulter said NOTHING that was wrong yet our Mediaite lefty goes crazy. LOL

Mark it. March 17th, 2011. The day the Right went officially shithouse crazy.

It’s SO funny how easily you libs are tweaked into responding just how Ann, Rush, or Beck want you to. You NEVER disappoint!

Liberal Tormentor said:
It’s SO funny how easily you libs are tweaked into responding just how Ann, Rush, or Beck want you to. You NEVER disappoint!

Have you been reading Mediaite the last few days? You guys believe this shit. Check out that article on Newsbusters.

Ohhh Ann turn me on tonight cause I’m Radioactive!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtJmVDoY904

Well it proves she is an idiot!

Kvon says:

Have you been reading Mediaite the last few days? You guys believe this shit

What did she say that isn’t correct? Was she making a point by being outrageous? Of course, but you libs are SO outrageous, it’s called for.

‘Radiation Is Actually Good For You’

This is all part of the talking points the right-wing wackos have been spreading all week that plays down Japans nuclear disaster for political purposes.
The only difference here is the incredible poor taste it takes to joke so lightly about it.

LOL…Sunbath in it!!!!

Liberal Tormentor said:
It’s SO funny how easily you libs are tweaked into responding just how Ann, Rush, or Beck want you to. You NEVER disappoint!

I just have to ask, why the name ‘Liberal Tormentor’? Is that how you what to define yourself, by what you hate? Isn’t there more to your identity?

What she fails to mention or even realize is there are different kinds (grades) of Radiation. example when you go and get an x-ray, the radiation absorbed into the body is far different (safer to a degree) than the radiation given off by the spent Uranium & Plutonium (worse kind).

The Eagle, I don’t hate anyone, I leave that to you libs. I merely like to torment you libs with logic and facts.

but yeah this is all political.. Notice how the Nuclear power supporting lobby has been on Capital hill since the first report of possible meltdown

Liberal Tormentor said:
The Eagle, I don’t hate anyone, I leave that to you libs. I merely like to torment you libs with logic and facts.

Says the girl who banned from this site 3 times for hatin’ on Colby. lolol

Liberal Tormentor said:
There is a growing body of evidence that radiation in excess of what the government says is actually good for you and actually reduces cancer

There is a growing body of evidence that radiation in excess of what the government says is actually good for you and actually reduces cancer.

Seriously? Weren’t you guys just complaining that Airport scanners give off radiation?

Yes Big Friggin Dummy, but to Colby, hating on him is calling him out for his liberal hypocrisy. You libs are SO thin-skinned!

Good thing no one takes her seriously.The media has done a superb job at warning of the harmful and dangerous effects of untested radon and particle (alpha, beta, neutrons) radiation.Thanks for the laugh though Ann! oh and praise for America’s most influential newspaper is never in short order. “…can find it in her heart to praise the New York Times.” LOL!!!!

kvon said:

Seriously? Weren’t you guys just complaining that Airport scanners give off radiation?

owned!

I think she’s trolling…

Kvon, you may not like her style, but it IS true that radiation has positive effects. You know she isn’t suggesting a nuclear disaster is good for your health. Again, she’s responding to the over the top liberal, I hate nuclear energy response, with an over the top argument. But feel free to keep spinning it!

Liberal Tormentor said:
Again, she’s responding to the over the top liberal, I hate nuclear energy response

Funny, I must have missed that.
I have seen many other countries suspending their nuclear programs but I have seen nothing but reasoned responses from the politicos here.

Maybe you can give me some recent links to over-the-top comments by major liberal politicians or pundits?

As a neutral observer in this cat-fight (I’m a fan of neither), Coulter ate his lunch. I guess Bilge-o couldn’t handle the concept of agreeing with the NYTimes.
Ann did simplify, but made a coherent argument.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Kvon, you may not like her style, but it IS true that radiation has positive effects. You know she isn’t suggesting a nuclear disaster is good for your health. Again, she’s responding to the over the top liberal, I hate nuclear energy response, with an over the top argument. But feel free to keep spinning it!

Naw,she’s playing her usual “devils advocate” act.Like i said before though,thank gawd no one takes her seriously.The media has done a superb job at highlighting the dangers of untested,uncontrolled radon and particles (alpha, beta, neutrons).Thankfully she has no control over what the media reports,assuring her relevance to that of a good laugh. LOL!!!!

Liberal Tormentor said:
Yes Big Friggin Dummy, but to Colby, hating on him is calling him out for his liberal hypocrisy. You libs are SO thin-skinned!

He must not be too thin skinned if he still lets your sorry ass post here.
He obviously knows your back.

Most sites would never allow a person to return after ONE ban. ;)

I think Ann needs some radiation, She should high tail it to Japan, pronto!

Royce Earnest Jr said:
I think Ann needs some radiation, She should high tail it to Japan, pronto!

I dunno….the first signs of radiation poisoning are weight loss and thinning of the hair.
I don’t think she could stand any more of that.

Big Friggin Dummy says:

Most sites would never allow a person to return after ONE ban.

Unless he knows he had no cause in the first place. He’s been called out for banning others several times in the last couple days. It has to be a little embarrassing for him that he feels the need to ban anyone who questions him.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Kvon, you may not like her style, but it IS true that radiation has positive effects. You know she isn’t suggesting a nuclear disaster is good for your health. Again, she’s responding to the over the top liberal, I hate nuclear energy response, with an over the top argument. But feel free to keep spinning it!

I’m not even anti-Nuclear, but Jesus Christ, this is a genuine disaster, and the Right is going apeshit crazy about it.
Come on, let’s have an adult conversation about this and not a “Pro-Radiation” and “Anti-Radiation” fight…for the love of god, this is childish.

Science boy says:’

The media has done a superb job at highlighting the dangers of untested,uncontrolled radon and particles (alpha, beta, neutrons).

No, they’ve done a superb job trying to scare people into NOT using nuclear power even though wind power has killed more people in the US. Liberals have used this tragedy for their own political gain and you know it. Stop denying it.

I really do think this transsexual should travel to Fukushima and do a little clean up work.

Color me Ignorant, we can’t all be as beautiful as you and your twin Megyn Kelly.

BFD said:
He must not be too thin skinned if he still lets your sorry ass post here.
He obviously knows your back.
Most sites would never allow a person to return after ONE ban. ;)

Ted , Ted. , Ted -, SarahP, SarahP. , Garth ‘s 1 ,2,, and 3 , Snowspot / Jon Martin , Color me Badd etc.
Yeah this site takes banning seriously , LOL .

Sometimes I think she just tries to by contraversial. If the table was turned and someone like Alan Grayson was advocating for radiation treatment for whatever, she’s likely be all over the bandwagon about how bad radiation is for people…”look at what happens after chemo…you hair falls out…some get sicker….this is good for you? the liberals are trying to kill your cancer-ridden children with radiation.” Opportunist.

By the way…radiation IS good for you….so is mercury (at acceptable levels) and high fructose-corn-sy….umm…CORN SUGAR.

my wife had idodine treatment for hyperthyroidism…radio-active iodine. Then it became hypothyroidism.

By the way, Ann…have some water…we had it bottled and shipped in directly from Japan for you quench your thirst with.

Liberal Tormentor said:
It has to be a little embarrassing for him that he feels the need to ban anyone who questions him.

It’s all about the PERSONAL attacks, baby. Debate a topic all you want but most of you righties don’t know how to do that without questioning character.
When you do it to staff here it is out of line. You should be banned.
This is their house, disagree if you want but show some f@#king respect or leave.
You never see us libs attack Matt the way you losers go after Colby and Tommy.

And you my dear, were the queen of staff personal attacks until they potty trained you. lol

Liberal Tormentor said:
The Eagle, I don’t hate anyone, I leave that to you libs. I merely like to torment you libs with logic and facts.

If your entire existence is to torment those of the liberal persuasion, then your life is pretty sad. I actually feel very sad for you.

kvon said:
“Pro-Radiation”

If it wasn’t for a radioactive spider we wouldn’t have Spiderman.

amirite?

Say, Ann I have an idea. Why don’t we a little experiment and we will expose you to radiation until you glow. After it is over, we will then see if you develop cancer.

Hey Ann, tell that to Chernobyl…

HuskersLoveBo said:
Say, Ann I have an idea. Why don’t we a little experiment and we will expose you to radiation until you glow. After it is over, we will then see if you develop cancer.

Heard Biden grew up downwind of a ‘Nuke.

Nuclear radiation is good for you and Jews need to be perfected.

Did I get that right, mAnn?

Coulter is an antagonist. That’s her(his) schtick. Tonight she got Bilge-o, and got him good. She got headlines. It’s been a while since she(he) had them. Headlines sell tickets and books. It’s a business, folks.
Now you are talking about her. Some are supporting, some are attacking. BUT SHE IS GETTING ATTENTION! This is no different than the cat-fights set up between Britney and BeYonce.
She’s selling tickets! Get it? Like Sarah, she doesn’t give a sh%t about you! She wants your money!
Sarah bailed on the people who elected her, for her own selfish reasons. She could have announced she had no political aspirations until after she had fulfilled her commitment to her electorate, BUT SHE DIDN’T!

Typical AC, headline-grabbing statement. Does anyone really think she believes most of what she says? I wish the late William F. Buckley would beam down and challenge her to a serious debate on conservative philosophy/politics–he would quickly demonstrate that she is incapable of engaging in civil discourse and show her to be nothing more than a “media whore.” She is an embarrasment to true conservatives (and I am a moderate Democrat).

kvon said:
Seriously? Weren’t you guys just complaining that Airport scanners give off radiation?

I’m not a fan of these like/dislike buttons on Mediaite, but I sure liked the shit out of that. I recall Coulter being particularly upset over them.

It will be interesting to see if she’ll travel to California and avail of all this free, healthy radiation. You know, put her money where her mouth is.

Liberal Tormentor said:
The Eagle, I don’t hate anyone, I leave that to you libs. I merely like to torment you libs with logic and facts.

So you like to torment people? Isn’t tormenting a hateful act? It all just seems so negative.

damien said:
It will be interesting to see if she’ll travel to California and avail of all this free, healthy radiation. You know, put her money where her mouth is.

Maybe while she’s out there she can visit her favorite gay resturant. You know, the gays she likes to bash and criticize.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rick-jacobs/ann-coulter-on-the-gay-ci_b_70156.html

Liberal Tormentor said:
Color me Ignorant,

You’ve already been colored and proven that many times over.

I like Ann for the simple reason that she gets liberals panties in a bunch.

If you’ve ever seen her on Red Eye, it’s evident that she has a great sense of humor and delights in the negative attention she gets from liberals who take life WAY too seriously.

Lighten up, turn off Fox, and plant some trees or something…

The point is, IT’S AN ACT!
When you watch O’Reilly, IT’S AN ACT!
When you watch Beck, IT’S AN ACT!
When you watch Hannity, IT’S AN ACT!
All of these programs were on something called the FOX ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK.
Not NEWS, but ENTERTAINMENT.
WHATEVER YOU THINK OF OTHER NETWORKS, ADMIT THAT
Then, we have a basis to talk and compare.

turk281 said:
I like Ann for the simple reason that she gets liberals panties in a bunch.

Do you mean like the liberals on here who get you RWers panties in a bunch?

Joseph Glackin said:
The point is, IT’S AN ACT!
When you watch O’Reilly, IT’S AN ACT!
When you watch Beck, IT’S AN ACT!
When you watch Hannity, IT’S AN ACT!
All of these programs were on something called the FOX ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK.
Not NEWS, but ENTERTAINMENT.
WHATEVER YOU THINK OF OTHER NETWORKS, ADMIT THAT
Then, we have a basis to talk and compare.

Michael Moore: millionaire, union busting, tax cheating hack
Alec Baldwin: Millionaire, tax cheating hack
Lawrence O’Donnell: Born rich, elistist hack
Barbara Streisand: Rich, tax cheating hack
John Kerry: millionaire, tax cheating hack
Al Gore: Millionaire, energy consuming hog, jet set flying, hack
NYT: All white editorial board, rich hacks
NPR: All white management hacks
etc, etc, etc……

What’s the difference? Those millionaires want to tell you how to live and spend your money, while hoarding incredible amounts of wealth. Laughing while they coax dumb folks into playing class warfare.

Ann isn’t actually a person. She is a socket puppet.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

the real john t said:
Do you mean like the liberals on here who get you RWers panties in a bunch?

I don’t have time for anger or vitriol. If you read any of my comments, I might be a smart ass but I don’t hate or say nasty things to people who disagree with me.

Al Gore..the Nuclear physicist and Medical expert..

Color Me Badd said:
I really do think this transsexual should travel to Fukushima and do a little clean up work.

Why are you using transsexual as an insult? Is it a shameful thing to be a transsexual?

You sound like a homophobe. At least Ann hangs around with and speaks to gay organizations.

You throw anti-gay slurs around online. Tsk Tsk.

The world would be a better place if all listen to Al Gore.

turk281 said:
I like Ann for the simple reason that she gets liberals panties in a bunch. If you’ve ever seen her on Red Eye, it’s evident that she has a great sense of humor and delights in the negative attention she gets from liberals who take life WAY too seriously. Lighten up, turn off Fox, and plant some trees or something…

she’s like a brilliant scientist who knows everything from the causes of global warming to how great nuclear radiation can be for you.

Ann’s become a multi-millionaire twisting liberals tails. You have to admitt she’s pretty damn good at it.

turk281 said:
. At least Ann hangs around with and speaks to gay organizations.

She only hangs around with them when she thinks nobody’s looking. When did dhe ever speak to a gay organization?

Rusty Shackelford said:
Ann’s become a multi-millionaire twisting liberals tails.

She made her millions as a corporate lawyer, screwing us all.

Rusty Shackelford said:
Ann’s become a multi-millionaire twisting liberals tails. You have to admitt she’s pretty damn good at it.

Exactly. And some liberals(not all) are so predictable that they fall into the same trap over and over.

Wanna know what the right does if they don’t like what’s being said by a pundit? We change the channel. That simple.

We don’t organize boycotts, or try to ban speech, or throw pies at speakers on campuses, or try to legislate “fairness doctrines”, or attack advertisers. Change the channel…

Liberal Tormentor said:
logic and facts.

HAHA YOU ARE GONNA START USING THIS WHEN?

the real john t said:
She only hangs around with them when she thinks nobody’s looking. When did dhe ever speak to a gay organization?

She was the keynote speaker at GOProud this year. Very publicly.

By the way, GOProud were the organization that took Don’t Ask Don’t Tell to federal court in California and won. Lol! It took gay conservatives to defeat DADT.

turk281 said:
Exactly. And some liberals(not all) are so predictable that they fall into the same trap over and over. Wanna know what the right does if they don’t like what’s being said by a pundit? We change the channel. That simple. We don’t organize boycotts, or try to ban speech, or throw pies at speakers on campuses, or try to legislate “fairness doctrines”, or attack advertisers. Change the channel…

That’s right block out the dissenting opinion. that way you’ll only get to hear exactly what you want all the time without ever having to think outside of your narrowminded perception.

To liberal tormentor: Your comparison of windmills and nuclear power demonstrates your ignorance.
Windmills don’t emit radiation.
Windmills don’t produce radioactive waste (that must be stored for decades or longer).
Just check out how many of the radioactive waste underground storage units have leaked at the Hanford plant in Washington.
Windmills don’t emit poison that can cause miscarriages, birth defects, cancer, etc.
Windmills don’t emit poison that can contaminate soil, groundwater, etc.
Windmills are unlikely targets for terrorists to sabotage.
Windmill are s o o m u c c h cheaper to build and maintain–an overall much safer, renewable source.
So, unless you work in the industry or have lots of stocks in General Electric….just what is your agenda…or, are you just ignorant?

BFD said:
I dunno….the first signs of radiation poisoning are weight loss and thinning of the hair.
I don’t think she could stand any more of that.

HAHAHHAHAHA!

turk281 said:
Wanna know what the right does if they don’t like what’s being said by a pundit? We change the channel. That simple.

On here what you do is try to change the subject.

Nationman said:
That’s right block out the dissenting opinion. that way you’ll only get to hear exactly what you want all the time without ever having to think outside of your narrowminded perception.

.
That statement is as ambiguous as Pat on SNL.

Grammie said:
.That statement is as ambiguous as Pat on SNL.

I’m saying that only listening to people who agree with you makes you a dense moron.

turk281 said:
Why are you using transsexual as an insult?

Ummm….because looking like one when you are NOT one is an insult.
Like if you called a woman a “linebacker”.
It is not an insult to linebackers, it is an insult to a woman who looks like a football player.

Unless you are saying she IS a transsexual?
Then it is an insult.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Liberals have used this tragedy for their own political gain and you know it. .

I SEEM TO RECALL CONSERVATIVES USING THAT LITTLE OL DISASTER WE ALL CALL 911 TO THEIR FULL ADVANTAGE FOR YEARS! YOU MAKE FALIN PALIN AND MICHELE BACHMANN LOOK SMART!

erin said:
So, unless you work in the industry or have lots of stocks in General Electric….just what is your agenda…or, are you just ignorant?

.
They also produce very low amounts of electricity per dollar spent and don’t work well in cold climates.

There have also been problems with the sound waves produced.

In short, wind power is a highly subsidized feel good minor source of electricity for now and the forseeable future.

Oh, I forgot that they kill a lot of birds.

Nationman said:
I’m saying that only listening to people who agree with you makes you a dense moron.

.
I suspected as much but it also could be interpreted to mean that those who try to silence speech they disagree with will not be exposed to any thoughts or ideas that challenge their own ideas.

It cuts both ways.

BFD said:
Ummm….because looking like one when you are NOT one is an insult.
Like if you called a woman a “linebacker”.
It is not an insult to linebackers, it is an insult to a woman who looks like a football player.

Unless you are saying she IS a transsexual?
Then it is an insult.

I’ll let you deal with that slightly sexist, slightly homophobic comment.

ImJustThatDamnGood said:
The world would be a better place if all listen to Al Gore.

Nah.. that would be like trusting Bush to handle the “War on Terror” oh…wait, that didn’t work out too well.

It’s not so hard to see that Al Gore is a hypocritical jerk-off. Most politicians are.. but then, why would you mention Al Gore? Unless, if only for a minute, to take the focus off of this drunk hooker. Sadly, most of the right buys everything she sells

Grammie said:
.I suspected as much but it also could be interpreted to mean that those who try to silence speech they disagree with will not be exposed to any thoughts or ideas that challenge their own ideas. It cuts both ways.

If you’re referring to the boycott of beck’s programs to me that’s voicing displeasure with what he’s saying. Fairness doctrine would be an accurate description though which is why I oppose it.

turk281 said:
We change the channel. That simple. We don’t organize boycotts, or try to ban speech, or throw pies at speakers on campuses, or try to legislate “fairness doctrines”, or attack advertisers. Change the channel…

Also forgot to mention, how many boycotts has bill oreilly organized again?

turk281 said:
I’ll let you deal with that slightly sexist, slightly homophobic comment.

Hey Mr Internet Hero and Protector Of Gays and Women, I never saw you question all the Rachel Maddow insults.
Stop with the bullshit, It’s all about taking sides with people like you.

turk281 said:
She was the keynote speaker at GOProud this year. Very publicly.

Yeah, and she was bashing them without them even realizing it. That’s how dumb conservatives are.

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/ann-coulter-goproud-speech-092710

She’s coming to the University of Wyoming and I bet she’ll have a receptive audience here since we have a ton of people pushing for uranium mining.

We’re using her to raise money for gay rights though. The link to pledge is below:

Ever sponsor your 12-year-old niece in a walk to raise awareness about a disease or cause? You know, $1.00 for every mile she completes? Well, this is similar.

For every minute Ann Coulter speaks at the University of Wyoming on March 31st, you can pledge a specific amount. Your donations will benefit three organizations doing great work on behalf of equal rights for the GLBTQ community right here in Wyoming!

Ann Coulter will be delivering a speech entitled “Why Liberals Are Wrong About Everything” at UW. She has apparently been giving the same speech since 2006 – evidenced by this exchange:

“You don’t want the Republicans in power, does that mean you want a dictatorship, gay boy?”

- Ann Coulter, in response to a student’s question: “You don’t want the Democrats in power, so does that mean you want a dictatorship?”; after her address “Liberals Are Wrong About Everything” at Indiana University (23 February 2006).

So we take that back – she switched up the title a titch. Essentially, the UW College Republicans are bringing in a speaker who gets $20,000 to deliver a five-year-old speech chock full of hatred and topped off with a side of homophobia to UW students.

We believe that Ann Coulter has every right to speak at UW. The more she speaks, the more money we raise. We hope she speaks until she’s hoarse, and that’s not a crack about her looks.

Unlike Ann, who said, “Frankly, I’m not a big fan of the First Amendment,” we really are fans of the First Amendment. We also believe in turning lemons like Ann into lemonade for GLBTQ organizations.

http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

Oh, and it was Log Cabin Republicans that won DADT

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
We hope she speaks until she’s hoarse, and that’s not a crack about her looks.

i lol’d

the real john t said:
Yeah, and she was bashing them without them even realizing it. That’s how dumb conservatives are.

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/ann-coulter-goproud-speech-092710

The ultimate liberal argument: People are too dumb to decide understand what’s best for their own self interest. This is why the left want a perpetual centralized nanny state.

I wouldn’t stereotype an entire room of gay men and women. I’m sure enough of them are “smart” enough to get whatever point Ann is trying to make.

Can you think of a worse stereotype then feeling all gays should share the same monolithic political view because they’re gay? That’s not very open minded, now is it?

Direct link to pledge form (also on FB) https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dGlIRndsRDgyV3hHeTNFdTlIRldpd2c6MQ

Yeah, we’re sitting here wondering if we should change the idea to buying her a one-way ticket to Fukishima to assist with the nuclear crisis there.

Rainbows have no substance, they are just light. They look good but they accomplish nothing.

Ann is a light that can you lead you to truth if you really listen. Marriage is between a man and a woman and you are not going to change it.

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
Oh, and it was Log Cabin Republicans that won DADT

No, it was GOProud. I’m sure you didn’t know because Rachel Maddow refused to have him on while he was making the rounds on all the networks..

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
She’s coming to the University of Wyoming and I bet she’ll have a receptive audience here since we have a ton of people pushing for uranium mining.

We’re using her to raise money for gay rights though. The link to pledge is below:

Ever sponsor your 12-year-old niece in a walk to raise awareness about a disease or cause? You know, $1.00 for every mile she completes? Well, this is similar.

For every minute Ann Coulter speaks at the University of Wyoming on March 31st, you can pledge a specific amount. Your donations will benefit three organizations doing great work on behalf of equal rights for the GLBTQ community right here in Wyoming!

Ann Coulter will be delivering a speech entitled “Why Liberals Are Wrong About Everything” at UW. She has apparently been giving the same speech since 2006 – evidenced by this exchange:

“You don’t want the Republicans in power, does that mean you want a dictatorship, gay boy?”

- Ann Coulter, in response to a student’s question: “You don’t want the Democrats in power, so does that mean you want a dictatorship?”; after her address “Liberals Are Wrong About Everything” at Indiana University (23 February 2006).

So we take that back – she switched up the title a titch. Essentially, the UW College Republicans are bringing in a speaker who gets $20,000 to deliver a five-year-old speech chock full of hatred and topped off with a side of homophobia to UW students.

We believe that Ann Coulter has every right to speak at UW. The more she speaks, the more money we raise. We hope she speaks until she’s hoarse, and that’s not a crack about her looks.

Unlike Ann, who said, “Frankly, I’m not a big fan of the First Amendment,” we really are fans of the First Amendment. We also believe in turning lemons like Ann into lemonade for GLBTQ organizations.

http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

At least you agree she has the right to speak!

Okay, so I’ll use Fox News as my source:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/09/federal-judge-rules-militarys-gay-ban-unconstitutional/

The Log Cabin Republicans, a 19,000-member group that includes current and former military members, filed a lawsuit in 2004 seeking an injunction to stop the ban’s enforcement. Phillips will draft the injunction with input from the group within a week, and the federal government will have a week to respond.
Government lawyers said the judge lacked the authority to issue a nationwide injunction.

After-hours e-mails requesting comment from U.S. Department of Justice attorney Paul G. Freeborne and from the Pentagon were not immediately returned Thursday.

The lawsuit was the biggest legal test of the law in recent years and came amid promises by President Barack Obama that he will work to repeal the policy.

The Log Cabin Republicans said more than 13,500 service members have been fired since 1994.
“This decision will change the lives of many individuals who only wanted to serve their country bravely,” said the group’s attorney, Dan Woods.

turk281 said:
No, it was GOProud. I’m sure you didn’t know because Rachel Maddow refused to have him on while he was making the rounds on all the networks..

is that why she had some who was completly against gay marriage and treated them with respect?

turk281 said:
I wouldn’t stereotype an entire room of gay men and women. I’m sure enough of them are “smart” enough to get whatever point Ann is trying to make.

No but, you’ll just stereotype liberals, huh?

turk281 said:
The ultimate liberal argument: People are too dumb to decide understand what’s best for their own self interest. This is why the left want a perpetual centralized nanny state.

jooce81 said:
What she fails to mention or even realize is there are different kinds (grades) of Radiation. example when you go and get an x-ray, the radiation absorbed into the body is far different (safer to a degree) than the radiation given off by the spent Uranium & Plutonium (worse kind).

In the few minutes she was on she also failed to tell you the Earth was round, the sky is blue, there are 365 days in a year, Ohio State will win the NCAA, Obama is a socialist and that the time changed last week.
How dumb are you? You didn’t mention that you were lying lib hiding behind a phony name to make stupid comments.

Think about the cowboy poets Ann,think about the f%$^%$ COWBOY POETS!!!! lol

the real john t said:
No but, you’ll just stereotype liberals, huh?

You are the quintessential brainstem, Quite possibly the most idiotic poster on this board, A blithering idiot.
LMAO !!!

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
Okay, so I’ll use Fox News as my source:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/09/federal-judge-rules-militarys-gay-ban-unconstitutional/

The Log Cabin Republicans, a 19,000-member group that includes current and former military members, filed a lawsuit in 2004 seeking an injunction to stop the ban’s enforcement. Phillips will draft the injunction with input from the group within a week, and the federal government will have a week to respond.
Government lawyers said the judge lacked the authority to issue a nationwide injunction.

After-hours e-mails requesting comment from U.S. Department of Justice attorney Paul G. Freeborne and from the Pentagon were not immediately returned Thursday.

The lawsuit was the biggest legal test of the law in recent years and came amid promises by President Barack Obama that he will work to repeal the policy.

The Log Cabin Republicans said more than 13,500 service members have been fired since 1994.
“This decision will change the lives of many individuals who only wanted to serve their country bravely,” said the group’s attorney, Dan Woods.

I stand corrected.

Thank you for the link.

gordonbloyershow said:
In the few minutes she was on she also failed to tell you the Earth was round, the sky is blue, there are 365 days in a year, Ohio State will win the NCAA, Obama is a socialist and that the time changed last week.How dumb are you? You didn’t mention that you were lying lib hiding behind a phony name to make stupid comments.

considering that those are important facts she seemed to forgot it is a big deal moron.

You’re welcome. Thanks for the civility!

Liberal Tormentor said:
Kvon, you may not like her style, but it IS true that radiation has positive effects. You know she isn’t suggesting a nuclear disaster is good for your health. Again, she’s responding to the over the top liberal, I hate nuclear energy response, with an over the top argument. But feel free to keep spinning it!

You have to understand that the libs have no idea when they are being made fun of. LOL
That is why they have no idea what Rush does on his show.
I nearly split my sides when I read Ann’s columns. The clowns here jump on the sarcasim as if she is hard core serious. They see themselves when she writes and they are offended that she hits them right between the eyes.

Girth said:
You are the quintessential brainstem, Quite possibly the most idiotic poster on this board,

No, you’ve got me beat by a mile.

Nationman said:
is that why she had some who was completly against gay marriage and treated them with respect?

Here it is from Mediaite:

“Cooper–head of the gay Log Cabin Republicans–can’t get booked on Maddow’s show even though she says she’s desperate to get Republicans on her show.”

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/the-dont-ask-dont-tell-activist-who-cant-get-on-rachel-maddows-show/

Interesting story and very telling of Maddow’s severe ideological bias.

the real john t said:
No, you’ve got me beat by a mile.

john t is actually trying to communicate, albeit not that well. Seriously, do you enjoy being stupid? LMAO !!!

turk281 said:
We don’t organize boycotts, or try to ban speech, or throw pies at speakers on campuses, or try to legislate “fairness doctrines”, or attack advertisers.

Tell that to Ward Churchill and the Dixie Chicks.

Nationman said:
considering that those are important facts she seemed to forgot it is a big deal moron.

She didn’t FORGET anything, moron. Why don’t you explain nuclear energy in five minutes while being asked questions. You have all the room in the world here and you forgot to tell everyone here why you are a coward hiding behind that phony name you use? You forgot to tell us what expertise you have to make any comments about anything and you can’t because you are so afraid to use your real name. Why don’t you just admit that you are a 15 year old kid playing with your moms computer. I think I her calling you, your bottle is warm.

dear grammie: you never presented any facts that dispute all of my points–problems w/ storage of radioactive materials, health issues, targets for terrorists…..
Yes, windmills have a ways to go. However, alternative energy has never had consistent policial/financial support such as the oil/nuclear industries have had. Nuclear power plants are not able to get insurance from private companies–so our goverment provides the “insurance” (taxpayer’s $$$). The 12 years w/ the 2 Bushes, who were in bed w/ the oil industry, kissed-up to the Saudi royal family, were no supporters personally/politically for renewable, alternataive energy. If CA had invested in wind/solar power back in the 70′s (when then Gov. Brown encourage investing and suporrting alfternative, renewable energy), by now weat least in CA would be more ahead of the curve. But it’s no too late. Yes, I want to continue to be able to fill up my tank w/ gas and keep my lights on–like we all do. But it’s time to invest in alternative, renewable, safer energy. As far as the birds, I am aware of the problem. I love the birdies too, and I’m sure that these minor problems can be solved much easier than continuing to figure out what the “H” to do w/ all that radioactive waste.

She had a guy from Exodus International, I know that. That might be who the previous poster is referencing.

But she should interview him, unless he has been featured on other programs that day, etc. Then maybe she can make the argument that he’s been on. Thought I saw an interview with the Log Cabin Republicans…

She did just interview two Wyoming republicans after doing several spots on the show about the Wyoming Legislature. I’m curious why this person from the Log Cabin Republicans didn’t make the cut.

http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

Girttie said:
john t is actually trying to communicate, albeit not that well. Seriously, do you enjoy being stupid?

You show how stupid you are everytime you comment on here. You never have anything to say about the topic, you just barge in and start your juvenile insults. Does your mom know you’re on the computer this late?

BFD said:
Tell that to Ward Churchill and the Dixie Chicks.

Also, tell that to Professor William Ayers at the University of Wyoming. UW banned him, got sued and lost. Turns out you can’t ban a speaker from a public university on the heckler’s veto. He gave a lecture on educational theory and Ann Coulter is the conservative response.

http://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/article_ca31d9ab-a04e-5c25-a82e-e86531e6a627.html
http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
You’re welcome. Thanks for the civility!

Sure. We may disagree on the size of government, but I know plenty of conservatives who want government out of peoples lives, including the bedroom.

A serious question though: why waste your time making a point with Ann Coulter? Why not go after people who have the power to help your cause, like the President?

You realize that Obama has the same views on same sex marriage that Sara Palin has, right?

That makes Dick Cheney more tolerant on gay marriage than the Prez. Something to think about…

gordonbloyershow said:
She didn’t FORGET anything, moron. Why don’t you explain nuclear energy in five minutes while being asked questions..

Why is she even talking about the subject in the first place on national television if she has no idea what’s she’s talking about?

gordonbloyershow said:
You forgot to tell us what expertise you have to make any comments about anything and you can’t because you are so afraid to use your real name. Why don’t you just admit that you are a 15 year old kid playing with your moms computer. I think I her calling you, your bottle is warm.

says the fat old man who’s claim to fame is getting a letter read on the limbaugh show. Good for you blowhard. I’m 21 btw, used to use my real name on this site but for some reason I either got banned or there’s some screw up in the system so I made another name in a hurry. Not hiding from anything, my name is ben Pratt.

gordonbloyershow said:
I think I her calling you,

You should put down the bottle and go sleep it off.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portage,_Indiana#Local_media

turk281 said:
Sure. We may disagree on the size of government, but I know plenty of conservatives who want government out of peoples lives, including the bedroom.

A serious question though: why waste your time making a point with Ann Coulter? Why not go after people who have the power to help your cause, like the President?

You realize that Obama has the same views on same sex marriage that Sara Palin has, right?

That makes Dick Cheney more tolerant on gay marriage than the Prez. Something to think about…

We do know that. However, Ann Coulter has made homophobic statements, GLBTQ orgs in Wyoming just beat back some very anti-gay bills, and she loves when people picket and protest her appearing. We thought this was a more productive way to express our displeasure at her invitation.

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
Also, tell that to Professor William Ayers at the University of Wyoming. UW banned him, got sued and lost. Turns out you can’t ban a speaker from a public university on the heckler’s veto. He gave a lecture on educational theory and Ann Coulter is the conservative response.

http://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/article_ca31d9ab-a04e-5c25-a82e-e86531e6a627.html
http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

That was because Christopher Kennedy sits on the board of trustee’s.

Ayers’ 1974 book Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism,” was dedicated to Sirhan Sirhan, who shot who shot his uncle Robert Kennedy to death in 1968.

That wasn’t conservatives. Although one can sympathize with his Kennedy’s point of view.

the real john t said:
You show how stupid you are everytime you comment on here. You never have anything to say about the topic, you just barge in and start your juvenile insults. Does your mom know you’re on the computer this late?

“Juvenile insults ” , “Does your mom know you’re on the computer this late?” LMAO !!!!!

I think we can agree that you are basically a brainstem. Yes?

Huh

turk281 said:
That was because Christopher Kennedy sits on the board of trustee’s.

Ayers’ 1974 book Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism,” was dedicated to Sirhan Sirhan, who shot who shot his uncle Robert Kennedy to death in 1968.

That wasn’t conservatives. Although one can sympathize with his Kennedy’s point of view.

Huh? Several conservative groups in Wyoming pushed their members to call the prof who invited him at home. This has nothing to do with University of Chicago. Ultimately, wealthy donors threatened to pull funds as well, but they also cited security threats as the reason for banning him. This was in Laramie, Wyoming.

http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

Girth said:
“Juvenile insults ” , “Does your mom know you’re on the computer this late?” LMAO !!!!! I think we can agree that you are basically a brainstem. Yes?

the great debator continues his rampage of facts and reason. Instead of avoiding ad hominem attacks like some other debators, he embraces them like the intelligent intellectual he is.

Nationman said:
the great debator continues his rampage of facts and reason. Instead of avoiding ad hominem attacks like some other debators, he embraces them like the intelligent intellectual he is.

Poor baby, maybe you and john t can share a hug , might brighten your day . LMAO!

For Turk 281:

Here’s a summary of what happened in Wyoming and why Ann Coulter is coming: http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2010/04/william_ayers_speech_universit.php

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
Huh

Huh? Several conservative groups in Wyoming pushed their members to call the prof who invited him at home. This has nothing to do with University of Chicago. Ultimately, wealthy donors threatened to pull funds as well, but they also cited security threats as the reason for banning him. This was in Laramie, Wyoming.

http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

I just re-read your post up top. I thought you were talking about the emeritus faculty status hubub.

Girth said:
Poor baby, maybe you and john t can share a hug , might brighten your day . LMAO!

His wit knows no Bounds! He responds to his critics like a true legend or perhaps a five year old who just wet the bed. I’ll leave that up to the historians chronicaling his great deeds!

turk281 said:
I just re-read your post up top. I thought you were talking about the emeritus faculty status hubub.

Oh, okay, I figured that’s what you were referencing, but I wasn’t sure. I just wish that they would have brought a conservative educational theorist as a response because that would have been an excellent foil.

http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
For Turk 281:

Here’s a summary of what happened in Wyoming and why Ann Coulter is coming: http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2010/04/william_ayers_speech_universit.php

So Bill Ayers who advocated violence, built bombs, praised the killer of RFK, blew up buildings, and whose own girlfriend died making a bomb is worthy of listening to….

But somehow Ann Coulter deserves a protest?

Coulter said that one year at the CPAC that she was going to talk about John Edwards but realized if she said faggot she’d have to go to rehab. She wasn’t invited to speak again. At least smart conservatives know the limits.

While Obama has previously stated the same position on legalizing marriage between two women or men as Palin, they are hardly in the same league. Obama just supported ending the “don’t ask, don’t tell,” military policy. Plus Obama, unlike many conservatives and televangelists, etc., don’t go around saying honosexual behavior is a sin and that if you just pray enough you will “be cured” of your homosexuality. It’s is possible to have a traditional view of marriage (or take that convenient political stance on gay marriage) without bring “God’s will” into the picture.

turk281 said:
So Bill Ayers who advocated violence, built bombs, praised the killer of RFK, blew up buildings, and whose own girlfriend died making a bomb is worthy of listening to….

But somehow Ann Coulter deserves a protest?

Ayers got protested to the point where the university banned him from setting foot on campus. He’s an expert on ed theory now, that’s what he spoke about. No bombs, and when a questioner asked how great of an example was he set for us college kids when he was in college, he replied “A very bad one.” He admitted during the Q&A that his group became dogmatic.

If he hadn’t had his constitutional rights violated by an illegal search, he’d have done time.

We’re not protesting her coming like others did Ayers. One person in Cheyenne suggested tying Ayers to the same fence Matthew Shepard was murdered on. We’re using the opportunity to raise money for gay rights, a cause she derides. That’s it. Some students, including republicans, are planning to picket her, but we are not connected nor supporting it.

excuse me: how great of an example he set when he was in college… that’s what I meant to say

AnnCoultersRainbow said:
Oh, okay, I figured that’s what you were referencing, but I wasn’t sure. I just wish that they would have brought a conservative educational theorist as a response because that would have been an excellent foil.

http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

Well, I checked out your facebook page and I’m glad that you’re not about censoring or throwing pies or other such nonsense.

Good for you. Good luck.

turk281 said:
Well, I checked out your facebook page and I’m glad that you’re not about censoring or throwing pies or other such nonsense.

Good for you. Good luck.

Thank you. That’s our complete opposite mission! I cannot abide something that’s assault (throwing the pie) or saying she shouldn’t speak. We don’t like what she’s said, but that’s not what one of the organizers of this went to court for – the right of Ayers to speak extends to Coulter and extends to any other speaker.

Y’all are makin’ me horny!!!!

Uh, Ann …. radiation is helpful to some cancer patients because radiation KILLS cells. The goal is to use radiation in a controlled manner such that the targeted malignant cells are the ones primarily impacted with minimal collateral damage.

Of course, Ann no doubt believes that since water is good for you, people should not pay attention to tsunami warnings either.

labman57 said:
Of course, Ann no doubt believes that since water is good for you, people should not pay attention to tsunami warnings either.

Or she thinks you should jump in a lake and breath as much water as possible in.

labman57 said:
Uh, Ann …. radiation is helpful to some cancer patients because radiation KILLS cells. The goal is to use radiation in a controlled manner such that the targeted malignant cells are the ones primarily impacted with minimal collateral damage.

Of course, Ann no doubt believes that since water is good for you, people should not pay attention to tsunami warnings either.

No doubt, the point is that low levels of radiation is nothing to freak out over.

See what happens when dumb ass teabaggers try to explain science. It shows how DUMB they are.

BTW: What the “H” does Ayers have to do w/ these issues. I don’t recall that he has made public statements re our national energy issues. Get real…B O R I N G

erin said:
BTW: What the “H” does Ayers have to do w/ these issues.

Well see, the RW likes to bring up anyone they think will make Obama look bad. This evening Beck on his show talked about the Rev. Wright. Hannity is always bringing up Wright like he has anything to do with anything.

turk281 said:
Michael Moore: millionaire, union busting, tax cheating hack
Alec Baldwin: Millionaire, tax cheating hack
Lawrence O’Donnell: Born rich, elistist hack
Barbara Streisand: Rich, tax cheating hack
John Kerry: millionaire, tax cheating hack
Al Gore: Millionaire, energy consuming hog, jet set flying, hack
NYT: All white editorial board, rich hacks
NPR: All white management hacks
etc, etc, etc……

What’s the difference? Those millionaires want to tell you how to live and spend your money, while hoarding incredible amounts of wealth. Laughing while they coax dumb folks into playing class warfare.

EXACTLY! Your paragons and the left”s paragons have feet of clay! BFD!
When the Tea Party and the Unions realize they are BOTH being SODOMIZED by the Corporations. this country will change. Until then, the Powers That Be will play one side against the other in order to screw both

I read her Human events article and I couldn’t see where she recommends either atomic bombs, or reactor meltdowns as a means of getting your daily recomended allowance of radiation But for those at a safe distance, the paradoxical evidence of good affects are worth acknowledging, if you are a paradox buff that is.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=42347

Anyone that would defend Coulter is as ignorant as she is.

the real john t said:
Anyone that would defend Coulter is as ignorant as she is.

Ignorant is not a good description of Ann Coulter. I’m sure you can find another more appropriate pejorative. Wait… Never mind, on the other hand, thanks for the compliment.

Radiation can not be beneficial anyhow. It is harmful in all cases. How this has been written? I wonder.
http://zetaclearfacts.net

Ann Coulter is a commodity. She has been carefully marketed. She has been trained. Watch. She takes long strides across the stage. She makes sure to cross her legs in front of the camera. She “tosses” her head to get her long, blond hair to fall correctly. Every move is choreographed. Ann is not a person, she is an act.

Coulter has a point. Radium was used in watches up thru the early 1970′s.
In the 60′s, shoe stores routinely used X-Rays machines that you could put your foot in to see that the shoes fit properly.

Would I buy and use a radium watch now…No I would not? Would I routinely stick my foot into an X-Ray machine to see that a shoe fit…NO, I would not do that either, but is it as dangerous as you lefty loons say….NO!

This is just another emotional response you lefties use that serves no other purpose than to try to destroy Coulter.

Your responses are getting rather old and tired.

So? Liberal health nazis are always contradicting themselves when they tell us what foods are good and which ones are bad.

http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com

It seems FOX seeks out the most ignorant people on the planet to comment on their show.

Reading the comments from you libs, it’s obvious you didn’t even listen to the segment.

PoliticallyIncorrectLibertarian said:
So? Liberal health nazis are always contradicting themselves when they tell us what foods are good and which ones are bad.

Pay no attention. PIL.
Eat what you want. Drink whatever. Feel free. I’ll truck in some Hinckley, Cal., water for you. With a little luck, we can deliver some spare ribs from the feral hogs in Chernobyl. I hear they glow, so you can find them on your patio after dark. Aren’t YOU glad we got that pesky government out of the way?
Yours in Libertarian Death! (At least we’re free to die!)

If she really believes this, I think we should pool our money together and buy her a ticket to go visiti the Fukushima reactors up close and personal.

You know, for her health and all that.

ImJustThatDamnGood said:
The world would be a better place if all listen to Al Gore.

The world would be a better place if Al Gore listened to Al Gore.

erin said:
To liberal tormentor: Your comparison of windmills and nuclear power demonstrates your ignorance.
Windmills don’t emit radiation.
Windmills don’t produce radioactive waste (that must be stored for decades or longer).
Just check out how many of the radioactive waste underground storage units have leaked at the Hanford plant in Washington.
Windmills don’t emit poison that can cause miscarriages, birth defects, cancer, etc.
Windmills don’t emit poison that can contaminate soil, groundwater, etc.
Windmills are unlikely targets for terrorists to sabotage.
Windmill are s o o m u c c h cheaper to build and maintain–an overall much safer, renewable source.
So, unless you work in the industry or have lots of stocks in General Electric….just what is your agenda…or, are you just ignorant?

Looks like we have here a modern day Don Quixote tilting at wind mills.

http://www.ecolo.org/documents/documents_in_english/WindmillFormula.htm

Joseph Glackin said:
She has been carefully marketed. She has been trained

kind like bho. selected, trained, put in a place of power to destroy this country.

Paleoconservatarian said:
No doubt, the point is that low levels of radiation is nothing to freak out over.

is that why she suggests that those incinerated by nuclear bombs were not torn apart by the radiation of the bomb? I mean really, in the clip she is literally suggesting that radiation is never bad for you.

Jenny Loos said:
It seems FOX seeks out the most ignorant people on the planet to comment on their show.

And it seems people who are too cheap to subscribe to FOX (it’s not always free on cable, you know) and so, they never watch it , claim to be greatest experts on FOX.

BTW, by your sweeping statement do you also include Democrats/liberals, of which there are far more on FOX, than there are Republicans/conservatives on MSNBC or CNN.

Joseph Glackin said:
Ann Coulter is a commodity. She has been carefully marketed. She has been trained. Watch. She takes long strides across the stage. She makes sure to cross her legs in front of the camera. She “tosses” her head to get her long, blond hair to fall correctly. Every move is choreographed. Ann is not a person, she is an act.

Yeah, I know what you mean, I used to smoke pot too.

I laugh out loud every time one of these crazies opens their mouth. Let’s put Ann, Sarah Palin and Michele Bachman on an island together and they can sit around being pretty and just make up all sorts of moronic things that haven’t a shred of truth or fact anywhere else except for their minds and the feeble minds of their followers.

She is 100% right! But the liberials like to scare you.
Facts cant not be disputed!
The left hates Ann so much she drives them crazy with hate.
Sad they dont hear the message.

LibertySister said:
She is 100% right! But the liberials like to scare you.
Facts cant not be disputed!
The left hates Ann so much she drives them crazy with hate.
Sad they dont hear the message.

Hey Liberty Sister AND Ann C., I hear they’re looking for volunteers to run hoses into a building in Japan. Something about needing to fill a pool with sea water. Either of you interested?

Excellent. Ms. Coulter proposes irradiating herself. I can’t wait. What an elegant solution to a minor but persistent annoyance.

Ann Coulter is always telling herself and the GOP how smart she is. And she, again, has proven how stupid she really is. Why doesn’t she fly to Japan to ground zero, spend a month there and then come back and tell the world how good radiation is. So, Ann, if you are so fucking smart, why do the techs and doctors around the patients while they receive their radiation therapy, wear lead and radiation monitors that must be changed every 6 months?

The Republican mind – at work.

If Coulter is so certain that this is the case, why isn’t she talking to O’Reilly from Fukushima orJapan. Put your money where your mouth is and go to Japan.

i guess you wingnuts are gonna have to stop complaining about airport scanners now…..and get rid of the sunblock….radiation is good for ya…….dumbasses

This loser should be kept from any microphone and TV camera for the rest of her life. She stupid and not in control of her faculties. ALL RADIATION is cumulative in nature – meaning the radiation you received on the first day of life is still present in your body the day you die – and in effect will cause any sort of possible ailments. She is neither a Nuclear physicist or a medical expert, and her continued grabbing of attention is detrimental to the American public. I would like to test her theory on her body first any time any place. I have 47 years experience in Medical radiography and I KNOW what I’m talking about!

Dear Ann,

C U Next Tuesday

<3

i don’t know the idiot that wrote this article . this is far from what happened during the interview . almost as bad as al sharpton saying he’s not racist . Ann Coulter did not claim that radiation was a “great cure” , Bill O’reilly did not show lot’s of skepticism . he played Bill O’reilly , made her explain where she got her facts and that is it . the radical wrote this article .

ProObamaAgenda said:
i guess you wingnuts are gonna have to stop complaining about airport scanners now…..and get rid of the sunblock….radiation is good for ya…….dumbasses

i don’t use sunblock and i never had a problem with the scanners . it was the dude feeling of my dick i didn’t like .

ifpff said:
Dear Ann, C U Next Tuesday <3

she’s a Ivy League Constitutional Law Professional . GOOD LOOKING TOOO . let’s see , there is a ivy league law professior …… oh , right , that idiot Barak Obama . went golfing before the tsunami had even washed out to sea . gotta get the important stuff in . OH , RIGHT , then he had to go on vacation to BRAZIL . just couldn’t wait …..

radsenior said:
This loser should be kept from any microphone and TV camera for the rest of her life. She stupid and not in control of her faculties. ALL RADIATION is cumulative in nature – meaning the radiation you received on the first day of life is still present in your body the day you die – and in effect will cause any sort of possible ailments. She is neither a Nuclear physicist or a medical expert, and her continued grabbing of attention is detrimental to the American public. I would like to test her theory on her body first any time any place. I have 47 years experience in Medical radiography and I KNOW what I’m talking about!

me too , if she’d let me . i’d even pay for the motel room .

THE MAN said:
GOOD LOOKING TOOO

http://jiveturkey.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/these-hands-are-small-i-know.jpg

THE MAN said:
me too , if she’d let me . i’d even pay for the motel room .

ewwww

Looks like the talking points have been sent out from NewsCorpse Central.
“Coulter BAD! Always been BAD! Never been one of us!”
Time for the two minute hate.

Apologies to Mr. Orwell.

That explains the lump on her neck.

LibertySister said:
She is 100% right! But the liberials like to scare you.
Facts cant not be disputed!
The left hates Ann so much she drives them crazy with hate.
Sad they dont hear the message.

Not so. I can’t wait to hear one of her speeches. The more she talks in Wyoming, the more money we raise for gay rights. So we hope she spews her hate all night long.

http://www.facebook.com/AnnCoultersRainbow

THE MAN said:
she’s a Ivy League Constitutional Law Professional . GOOD LOOKING TOOO . let’s see , there is a ivy league law professior …… oh , right , that idiot Barak Obama . went golfing before the tsunami had even washed out to sea . gotta get the important stuff in . OH , RIGHT , then he had to go on vacation to BRAZIL . just couldn’t wait …..

Get some new material, righties. “blah blah blah blah golfing! blah blah blah blah BRAZIL! blah blah blah blah NCAA brackets!! LAME-O

THE MAN said:
me too , if she’d let me . i’d even pay for the motel room .

The Man, ummm, your taste is questionable. There’s a reason she’s called DAN Coulter.

Perhaps doses of radiation caused her enlarged adam’s apple?

BushClintonCrimeFamily said:
The Man, ummm, your taste is questionable. There’s a reason she’s called DAN Coulter.

Perfect gift at a surprise party. Careful when you unwrap it!
And remember, as Meatloaf said:
“Two out of three ain’t bad.”

Garth said:
That explains the lump on her neck.

What explains the empty airsack sitting on your neck?

BREAKING NEWS:

ED SHULTZ STAGED HIS RADIO SHOW CALL-IN’S!

Breaking on FOX right now!

“”Hey look what it did for my adams apple?” “lets spray it on all fruit trees”

Liberal Tormentor said:
Science boy says:’ The media has done a superb job at highlighting the dangers of untested,uncontrolled radon and particles (alpha, beta, neutrons). No, they’ve done a superb job trying to scare people into NOT using nuclear power even though wind power has killed more people in the US. Liberals have used this tragedy for their own political gain and you know it. Stop denying it.

Can I get some facts to back up the windpower deaths? Hmmm…

Nationman said:
is that why she suggests that those incinerated by nuclear bombs were not torn apart by the radiation of the bomb? I mean really, in the clip she is literally suggesting that radiation is never bad for you.

She is -literally- saying “radiation in excess of what the government says is are the minimum amounts you should be exposed to you are actually good for you” and cites the sources from which she drew her information while brushing aside the reducto ad absurdums that O’Reilly and you try to employ to distract her from her point.

She’s -literally- saying the concept that “the tiniest drop of radiation is dangerous,” as perpetuated by anti-nuclear proponents and certain media sources, is “absolutely not true.”

Comprehension problem?

fishchef said:
Can I get some facts to back up the windpower deaths? Hmmm…

Nah, the LT lives in one of those “reality free zones” developed under the guidance of the Bush/Cheney Regime.
Scott McClelland said, “Republicans don’t live in a reality based world.”
What they have is what they want.
Like Humpty-Dumpty,
“When I use a word, it means what I want it to.
Nothing more, nothing less.”

This drag queen Ann Coulter needs some radiation.

“Ann Coulter: ‘Radiation Is Actually Good For You’”

Really? Look what it’s done to HER!

Even the dimmest of Fakes “News” viewers must eventually wake up to this charlatan. Hell, even O’REILLY couldn’t swallow her ridiculous assertions.

I take particular offense to Coulter’s dangerous and dishonest deception. A sister of mine died from malignant melanoma, probably contracted through unprotected overexposure to sunlight (i.e., solar radiation).

Tell my dead sister she needs more radiation, Ann. Damn your soul . . . if any.

I wonder: is that a goiter under her chin? has she had a date lately? why hasn’t she been married? does hate cause her bulemia? what is she actually good for? does she contribute to any charity?

What a hack!

Paleoconservatarian said:
distract

Actually:

“he implored Coulter to be “responsible” and admit that “some radiation will kill you.” She refused”

Comprehension problem?

@sshole.

Since the loons here want to distort what Coulter is talking about, why don’t you just read it for yourself.
It is well documented with attributions from REAL doctors and scientists.

A GLOWING REPORT ON RADIATION
by Ann Coulter
March 16, 2011

With the terrible earthquake and resulting tsunami that have devastated Japan, the only good news is that anyone exposed to excess radiation from the nuclear power plants is now probably much less likely to get cancer.

This only seems counterintuitive because of media hysteria for the past 20 years trying to convince Americans that radiation at any dose is bad. There is, however, burgeoning evidence that excess radiation operates as a sort of cancer vaccine.

As The New York Times science section reported in 2001, an increasing number of scientists believe that at some level — much higher than the minimums set by the U.S. government — radiation is good for you. “They theorize,” the Times said, that “these doses protect against cancer by activating cells’ natural defense mechanisms.”

Among the studies mentioned by the Times was one in Canada finding that tuberculosis patients subjected to multiple chest X-rays had much lower rates of breast cancer than the general population.

And there are lots more!

A $10 million Department of Energy study from 1991 examined 10 years of epidemiological research by the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health on 700,000 shipyard workers, some of whom had been exposed to 10 times more radiation than the others from their work on the ships’ nuclear reactors. The workers exposed to excess radiation had a 24 percent lower death rate and a 25 percent lower cancer mortality than the non-irradiated workers.

Isn’t that just incredible? I mean, that the Department of Energy spent $10 million doing something useful? Amazing, right?

In 1983, a series of apartment buildings in Taiwan were accidentally constructed with massive amounts of cobalt 60, a radioactive substance. After 16 years, the buildings’ 10,000 occupants developed only five cases of cancer. The cancer rate for the same age group in the general Taiwanese population over that time period predicted 170 cancers.

The people in those buildings had been exposed to radiation nearly five times the maximum “safe” level according to the U.S. government. But they ended up with a cancer rate 96 percent lower than the general population.

Bernard L. Cohen, a physics professor at the University of Pittsburgh, compared radon exposure and lung cancer rates in 1,729 counties covering 90 percent of the U.S. population. His study in the 1990s found far fewer cases of lung cancer in those counties with the highest amounts of radon — a correlation that could not be explained by smoking rates.

Tom Bethell, author of the The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science has been writing for years about the beneficial effects of some radiation, or “hormesis.” A few years ago, he reported on a group of scientists who concluded their conference on hormesis at the University of Massachusetts by repairing to a spa in Boulder, Mont., specifically in order to expose themselves to excess radiation.

At the Free Enterprise Radon Health Mine in Boulder, people pay $5 to descend 85 feet into an old mining pit to be irradiated with more than 400 times the EPA-recommended level of radon. In the summer, 50 people a day visit the mine hoping for relief from chronic pain and autoimmune disorders.

Amazingly, even the Soviet-engineered disaster at Chernobyl in 1986 can be directly blamed for the deaths of no more than the 31 people inside the plant who died in the explosion. Although news reports generally claimed a few thousand people died as a result of Chernobyl — far fewer than the tens of thousands initially predicted — that hasn’t been confirmed by studies.

Indeed, after endless investigations, including by the United Nations, Manhattan Project veteran Theodore Rockwell summarized the reports to Bethell in 2002, saying, “They have not yet reported any deaths outside of the 30 who died in the plant.”

Even the thyroid cancers in people who lived near the reactor were attributed to low iodine in the Russian diet — and consequently had no effect on the cancer rate.

Meanwhile, the animals around the Chernobyl reactor, who were not evacuated, are “thriving,” according to scientists quoted in the April 28, 2002 Sunday Times (UK).

Dr. Dade W. Moeller, a radiation expert and professor emeritus at Harvard, told The New York Times that it’s been hard to find excess cancers even from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, particularly because one-third of the population will get cancer anyway. There were about 90,000 survivors of the atomic bombs in 1945 and, more than 50 years later, half of them were still alive. (Other scientists say there were 700 excess cancer deaths among the 90,000.)

Although it is hardly a settled scientific fact that excess radiation is a health benefit, there’s certainly evidence that it decreases the risk of some cancers — and there are plenty of scientists willing to say so. But Jenny McCarthy’s vaccine theories get more press than Harvard physics professors’ studies on the potential benefits of radiation. (And they say conservatives are anti-science!)

I guess good radiation stories are not as exciting as news anchors warning of mutant humans and scary nuclear power plants — news anchors who, by the way, have injected small amounts of poison into their foreheads to stave off wrinkles. Which is to say: The general theory that small amounts of toxins can be healthy is widely accepted –except in the case of radiation.

Every day Americans pop multivitamins containing trace amount of zinc, magnesium, selenium, copper, manganese, chromium, molybdenum, nickel, boron — all poisons.

They get flu shots. They’ll drink copious amounts of coffee to ingest a poison: caffeine. (Back in the ’70s, Professor Cohen offered to eat as much plutonium as Ralph Nader would eat caffeine — an offer Nader never accepted.)

But in the case of radiation, the media have Americans convinced that the minutest amount is always deadly.

Although reporters love to issue sensationalized reports about the danger from Japan’s nuclear reactors, remember that, so far, thousands have died only because of Mother Nature. And the survivors may outlive all of us over here in hermetically sealed, radiation-free America.

COPYRIGHT 2011 ANN COULTER meaningless

Barbara Hodges, thanks for using your real name.
The fact that you like Cobert, Maher, Tiger Woods and Maddow tells us everything we need to know about you.
Has anyone notified you when they are coming to take you away? I am sure shock treatments will work.

gordonbloyershow said:
Barbara Hodges, thanks for using your real name.The fact that you like Cobert, Maher, Tiger Woods and Maddow tells us everything we need to know about you.Has anyone notified you when they are coming to take you away? I am sure shock treatments will work.

Must be the voice of experience…

Perhaps Annie should talk to the former residents of Pripyat in the Ukraine, sight of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. Those that arn’t dead have a variety of cancers and thryoid problems from excess radiation. Why does anyone listen to this hag?

MissMuffett said:
Actually:

“he implored Coulter to be “responsible” and admit that “some radiation will kill you.” She refused”

Comprehension problem?

@sshole.

She should have refused to admit that “some radiation will kill you” because it’s flat out untrue.

Do you understand?

Tedderman said:
Perhaps Annie should talk to the former residents of Pripyat in the Ukraine, sight of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. Those that arn’t dead have a variety of cancers and thryoid problems from excess radiation. Why does anyone listen to this hag?

“Those that aren’t dead”

So how many of those 50,000 former residents of Pripyat are actual dead, then? Though the structure of your sentence implies that many are, “those” isn’t exactly a precise number. Actually do the research, and you might surprise yourself.

The larger argument, for the simpletons who aren’t getting it, isn’t that nuclear accidents are peachy or without consequence. It’s that nuclear accidents, depending on their severity, aren’t nearly as bad as most people think they are.

Hey there, I find an amazing

Hey there, I find an amazing web,please click the web ,you can find big pleasantly surprised
╭⌒╮WELCOME http://www.fullmalls.com/

How great you are Mrs Ann Coulter, is proven here by how many libs flocked to this article about you just to click on the thumbs down icon. It seems obvious they didn’t even read the article, and did just that. Oh how amusing to see the left in a tirade. Your mere presence or mention of you sends libs out like vampires at a blood market. HO HO HO, HA HA HA, HEH HEH HEH, LOL LOL LOL!

Ann is right more often then anyone you lefties follow. You should read and worship her if you want to do right by your country.

RA RA RA SIS BOOM BA!! LOL!

Ann Coulter…now there’s an informed opinion for ya. What a total idiot. She has no personal integrity and is simply a life support system for a vagina.

I’m not a conservative by any stretch, but this article is fucking brain-dead.

“She is making a medical point: that radiation is good for the human body in doses larger than what the government regulation standards currently are, not just in the small doses given in processes like chemotherapy (which no one will deny often cure cancer).”

Chemotherapy radiation doses are VERY HIGH compared to the government-regulated doses she is talking about. The cumulative limit for the radiation workers in Japan is 250 mSv. Radiation therapy doses are more like 25,000 mSv, or about 100 times that amount or more. I won’t go into it any more because everyone on this page is too much of a retard to understand it and because you don’t even care whether you’re right or wrong anyway.

My politics are generally liberal, but Ann Coulter’s column was smart, substantive, and well-researched. Frances Martel’s column is embarrassingly stupid, vapid, and factually wrong.