Batten down the hatches!

From the article:
“attractive women in general – there’s some disconnect in society that you can’t be attractive and smart.” Submitted without further comment.

Sounds like someone was biting their tongue REALLY hard there.

No no. They’re prominent because they’re attractive. They’re criticized because they’re stupid.

People find Michelle Bachmann attractive? I find that hard to believe, and suggesting that there is not legitimate criticism of Bachmann is totally ridiculous and stupid.

Liberal women aren’t exactly the most beautiful beings out there…so yes, jealousy is probably part of it.

I’m sure most liberal women are also mad that someone like Bachmann, who has raised 25 children, is in office makes them mad too.

Feminism is nonexistent in the liberal world.

Actually he is right. The left cant stand right wing women who look good and have influence on the right.

On the other hand most of the comparable women on the left are either hideous or are lesbians.

“lightening rods for criticism” I myself don’t care for their views.Looks can be built up or taken away.

WCinWI said:
Liberal women aren’t exactly the most beautiful beings out there…so yes, jealousy is probably part of it.

How do you know? Have you conducted a poll? Are you suggesting there is absolutely no legitimate criticism of Bachmann or Palin?

Yes, that’s it! {rolling my eyes}

They get attacked because they are strong, CONSERVATIVE women, period.

paulmdoro said:
How do you know? Have you conducted a poll? Are you suggesting there is absolutely no legitimate criticism of Bachmann or Palin?

Congress is the same as real life. Ugly girls and women are insecure around Victoria Secret models all the time. You don’t need a poll when it’s common sense. Also, I’m a female.

I am all for legitimate criticism. However, if it’s not concerning the Alaskan Pipeline, SS, fiscal debt, etc. how in the world is it credible?

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
They get attacked because they are strong, CONSERVATIVE women, period.

They get attacked because they say irresponsible things and blatantly make stuff up, regularly.

Are there any attractive female liberals? Didn’t think so. O’Reilly forgot to add the brilliance of the two ladies as well. They rule!

WCinWI said:
Congress is the same as real life. Ugly girls and women are insecure around Victoria Secret models all the time. You don’t need a poll when it’s common sense. Also, I’m a female.

I am all for legitimate criticism. However, if it’s not concerning the Alaskan Pipeline, SS, fiscal debt, etc. how in the world is it credible?

When she does something credible, she’ll be attacked on credible grounds. When she’s a reality TV show star who doesn’t do real interviews with real media, not even Bill O’Reilly, she should be attacked as the clown and cancer on politics that she is.

Publius219 said:
When she does something credible, she’ll be attacked on credible grounds. When she’s a reality TV show star who doesn’t do real interviews with real media, not even Bill O’Reilly, she should be attacked as the clown and cancer on politics that she is.

Glad to know that you disrespect our President enough to use vitriol. Continue your nonsense postings.

WCinWI said:
Congress is the same as real life. Ugly girls and women are insecure around Victoria Secret models all the time. You don’t need a poll when it’s common sense. Also, I’m a female.

I am all for legitimate criticism. However, if it’s not concerning the Alaskan Pipeline, SS, fiscal debt, etc. how in the world is it credible?

Congress is the same as real life? How do you figure? You are resorting to ridiculous generalizations that have no basis in reality. Common sense would suggest that there are attractive and non-attractive liberal and conservative women.

Since HWood is mostly liberal, I’m pretty sure there are plenty of attractive liberals, women and men.

Isn’t this like saying Obama gets attacked because he’s black? That something superficial is the reason for the attacks, rather than legitimate disagreements over policies and positions?

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
They get attacked because they are strong, CONSERVATIVE women, period.

They get criticized for saying the most banal, loopy things. Maybe that is what conservatives like in a woman, I don’t know.

I would rather date a average looking smart woman than a stunning idiot. While both of these women are attractive in a canine sort of way, what comes out of their mouths is often ill-researched (or ill advised) and delivered in a petulant manner. Pulling facts out of your posterior does not make you intelligent.

WCinWI said:
Victoria Secret models all the time. You don’t need a poll when it’s common sense. Also, I’m a female

Umm, You do not speak for all woman.There are beautiful people not just woman all around you ,does that mean you are just insecure of your own looks?

paulmdoro said:
Congress is the same as real life? How do you figure? You are resorting to ridiculous generalizations that have no basis in reality. Common sense would suggest that there are attractive and non-attractive liberal and conservative women.

Ok – let me be more specific. There are none, if maybe 1-2, attractive liberal women in the Congress and Senate. Perhaps there are attractive liberal women – but it’s more rare.

Tea Weasel, I’m pretty sure it’s you that says the most banal, loopy things.

ROCKSTEADY said:
Umm, You do not speak for all woman.There are beautiful people not just woman all around you ,does that mean you are just insecure of your own looks?

I refuse to talk to someone with such poor spelling and grammar. Sheesh.

WCinWI said:
Ok – let me be more specific. There are none, if maybe 1-2, attractive liberal women in the Congress and Senate. Perhaps there are attractive liberal women – but it’s more rare.

Women are what percentage of Congress? And what percentage of the overall population?

The Tea Weasel said:
They get criticized for saying the most banal, loopy things. Maybe that is what conservatives like in a woman, I don’t know.

I would rather date a average looking smart woman than a stunning idiot. While both of these women are attractive in a canine sort of way, what comes out of their mouths is often ill-researched (or ill advised) and delivered in a petulant manner. Pulling facts out of your posterior does not make you intelligent.

Another person that is heeding the President’s call to be more civil.

Why do you disrespect the President so much? Not cool.

WCinWI said:
I refuse to talk to someone with such poor spelling and grammar. Sheesh.

Thats fine but it just goes to prove how insecure you really are.

paulmdoro said:
Women are what percentage of Congress? And what percentage of the overall population?

Who cares? Haha

Just because I clarify a point and you wish to drag it into some point that you’re attempting to make, doesn’t make it a legitimate point. As Seeing said, there are probably some attractive non-Congress and non-Senate females. Other than that, there is nothing else to discuss regarding this matter.

paulmdoro said:
Women are what percentage of Congress? And what percentage of the overall population?

Who cares? Haha

Just because I clarify a point and you wish to drag it into some point that you’re attempting to make, doesn’t make it a legitimate point. As Seeing said, there are probably some attractive non-Congress and non-Senate females.

WCinWI said:
Who cares? Haha

Just because I clarify a point and you wish to drag it into some point that you’re attempting to make, doesn’t make it a legitimate point. As Seeing said, there are probably some attractive non-Congress and non-Senate females. Other than that, there is nothing else to discuss regarding this matter.

I’m glad you’re comfortable making absurd generalizations. Whatever makes you happy. O’Reilly’s contention is still completely asinine.

ROCKSTEADY said:
Thats fine but it just goes to prove how insecure you really are.

Haha no, it proves that I don’t like poor grammar or bad spellers.

Is this why Rush Limbaugh gets criticized?

The fact that they’re both bat $hit crazy might explain some of the criticism. O’Reilly just wants to get in their pants.

paulmdoro said:
I’m glad you’re comfortable making absurd generalizations. Whatever makes you happy. O’Reilly’s contention is still completely asinine.

The fact that you took issue with what I had to say proves that it wasn’t asinine. If you can’t see that attractive, conservative women get attacked more than liberal members in Congress and Senate, that’s not my fault.

Conservative women as a whole get made fun of over the most frivolous things versus liberal counterparts. That’s just a fact.

Name a single Democrat women that the media goes after. Just one!

WCinWI said:
The fact that you took issue with what I had to say proves that it wasn’t asinine. If you can’t see that attractive, conservative women get attacked more than liberal members in Congress and Senate, that’s not my fault.

Conservative women as a whole get made fun of over the most frivolous things versus liberal counterparts. That’s just a fact.

Since you never answered it, I will repeat it. Isn’t this like saying Obama only gets criticized because he is black?

Interesting you would just vote for someone on their looks alone.I can understand the attacks.You’r very insecure about your looks.

Dronetek said:
Name a single Democrat women that the media goes after. Just one!

Rachel Maddow

Dronetek said:
Name a single Democrat women that the media goes after. Just one!

Hillary Clinton.

Dronetek said:
Name a single Democrat women that the media goes after. Just one!

You’re asking the impossible, women by definition are more than one.

The left attack someone on the right based purely on looks?! No… never happens.

The women on FOX have never been attacked by the left because they’re attractive. Bristol Palin was never attacked because of her “weight.” And Ann Coulter is never discussed in terms of how she looks.

Never happens. Nope. Nuh-uh.

Actually, I disagree with Bill here. They’re not attacked because they’re attractive, they’re attacked because they don’t tow the right line. Once that happens, all bets are off, and they can be attacked for any reason after that. Attractive women are especially attacked because of stereotypes which say an attractive woman can’t possibly be smart too. But, such stereotypes are overlooked when the woman in question is saying what certain folks want them to say.

The looks may make the attacks more severe (for one reason or another), but the basis for all such attacks are still ideological.

paulmdoro said:
People find Michelle Bachmann attractive? I find that hard to believe, and suggesting that there is not legitimate criticism of Bachmann is totally ridiculous and stupid.

The real conundrum is that if attractive people are attacked O’Reilly should be completely safe from attack.

paulmdoro said:
Since you never answered it, I will repeat it. Isn’t this like saying Obama only gets criticized because he is black?

Last I checked, he hasn’t been criticized for being Black. He rarely even mentions his ethnicity so I don’t see that as an issue in his politics.

WCinWI said:
Another person that is heeding the President’s call to be more civil.

Why do you disrespect the President so much? Not cool.

I took my cue from you. And good use of the “call to be civil” theme. But if you are trying to camouflage something, don’t cover up half of it.

Since you are a woman, I am surprised you think “ugly women are insecure around Victoria’s Secret models”. Do you know this from personal experience? I know some average looking women (who you might think are ugly) who think VS models, while beautiful, are brainless twits.

paulmdoro said:
Hillary Clinton.

Both conservatives and democrats “like” Hillary.

Try another.

Thelonious Funk said:
Is this why Rush Limbaugh gets criticized?

He is a pig.Just a plus he looks like one also.

WCinWI said:
Last I checked, he hasn’t been criticized for being Black. He rarely even mentions his ethnicity so I don’t see that as an issue in his politics.

Way to not answer the question. I will try again. Isn’t suggesting that Palin/Bachmann are criticized because they’re attractive (and not for legitimate reasons) the same as suggesting that Obama is criticized because he is black (and not for legitimate reasons)? Isn’t it saying that purely artificial reasons are behind the attacks?

ImNotBlue said:
The left attack someone on the right based purely on looks?! No… never happens.

The women on FOX have never been attacked by the left because they’re attractive. Bristol Palin was never attacked because of her “weight.” And Ann Coulter is never discussed in terms of how she looks.

Never happens. Nope. Nuh-uh.

Actually, I disagree with Bill here. They’re not attacked because they’re attractive, they’re attacked because they don’t tow the right line. Once that happens, all bets are off, and they can be attacked for any reason after that. Attractive women are especially attacked because of stereotypes which say an attractive woman can’t possibly be smart too. But, such stereotypes are overlooked when the woman in question is saying what certain folks want them to say.

The looks may make the attacks more severe (for one reason or another), but the basis for all such attacks are still ideological.

Good post.

WCinWI said:
Both conservatives and democrats “like” Hillary.

Try another.

Anyone paying attention during the last 20 years or so knows that Hillary has received negative media attention. No need to try again.

paulmdoro said:
Way to not answer the question. I will try again. Isn’t suggesting that Palin/Bachmann are criticized because they’re attractive (and not for legitimate reasons) the same as suggesting that Obama is criticized because he is black (and not for legitimate reasons)? Isn’t it saying that purely artificial reasons are behind the attacks?

No, it’s saying that the attractiveness is just one of the factors. As I said, if you are an attractive conservative person in general, you’re attacked more than liberal women.

When Bachmann and Palin get criticized over legitimate things, that’s good. I just rarely see it.

Do you think that conservative or liberal children get more face time in the media?

paulmdoro said:
Anyone paying attention during the last 20 years or so knows that Hillary has received negative media attention. No need to try again.

Haha so picking a person that was the wife of #1 is a cop-out. Beyond silly.

ProgLib said:
The fact that they’re both bat $hit crazy might explain some of the criticism. O’Reilly just wants to get in their pants.

Please explain how they are bat shit crazy. I know that’s a fun phrase, and you think it makes you sound witty, but let’s have some particulars.

WCinWI said:
No, it’s saying that the attractiveness is just one of the factors. As I said, if you are an attractive conservative person in general, you’re attacked more than liberal women.

When Bachmann and Palin get criticized over legitimate things, that’s good. I just rarely see it.

Do you think that conservative or liberal children get more face time in the media?

Just one of the factors in what? Being criticized? Does it just come down to what each person deems legitimate criticism?

Seems to me they are one and the same. Each contention suggests that there is no legitimate criticism, that people say negative things based upon superficial reasons.

paulmdoro says:
Dronetek said:
Name a single Democrat women that the media goes after. Just one!

Hillary Clinton.

Mostly after they’d decided they wanted to back Obama and not her, in my opinion.

paulmdoro said:
Just one of the factors in what? Being criticized? Does it just come down to what each person deems legitimate criticism?

Seems to me they are one and the same. Each contention suggests that there is no legitimate criticism, that people say negative things based upon superficial reasons.

That last sentence was bingo.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
paulmdoro says:
Dronetek said:
Name a single Democrat women that the media goes after. Just one!

Hillary Clinton.

Mostly after they’d decided they wanted to back Obama and not her, in my opinion.

I’d say it goes back further than 2 or 3 years ago.

WCinWI said:
That last sentence was bingo.

And it isn’t true. There is legitimate criticism of all three.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
paulmdoro says:
Dronetek said:
Name a single Democrat women that the media goes after. Just one!

Hillary Clinton.

Mostly after they’d decided they wanted to back Obama and not her, in my opinion.

It astonishes me when liberals and even moderates are so shocked when a conservative says that they are attacked more than their counterparts.

I’m glad that conservative feminism has been making a comeback. It’s about time that the liberals stop holding women back from their potential instead of making them victims.

paulmdoro said:
And it isn’t true. There is legitimate criticism of all three.

It’s rare. Unless you can show me a recent article of gas as it relates to Palin, I would like to see a legitimate recent criticism of Palin that isn’t based on a false premise.

Gash! Billo! this is embarrassing. Wonder how his wife feels about him calling other people women attractive.

WCinWI said:
It’s rare. Unless you can show me a recent article of gas as it relates to Palin, I would like to see a legitimate recent criticism of Palin that isn’t based on a false premise.

You are seriously stating that there is no legitimate criticism of Palin? So, she’s perfect?

LOL I say let the conservatives elect more like Bachman and Palin. Laughter is good for the soul.

And where,exactly has conservative feminism been to need to make comeback? Shopping at the mall?

paulmdoro said:
You are seriously stating that there is no legitimate criticism of Palin? So, she’s perfect?

If you can show me a recent article of something that Palin has dealt with in her government or private sector role (there’s 20 yrs to pull from), then I would accommodate that discussion.

paulmdoro said:
People find Michelle Bachmann attractive? I find that hard to believe, and suggesting that there is not legitimate criticism of Bachmann is totally ridiculous and stupid.

Let me rephrase that for you Paul and see what you think of it then:

.
People find Michelle OBAMA attractive? I find that hard to believe, and suggesting that there is not legitimate criticism of OBAMA is totally ridiculous and stupid

WC in WI says:

I’m glad that conservative feminism has been making a comeback

I don’t think that “liberal feminists” think you can be a conservative AND a feminist.

Paul, I do agree that Hillary gets a wee bit of heat from some in the media, but you aren’t saying it’s anywhere near what conservative woman get, are you?

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
WC in WI says:

I’m glad that conservative feminism has been making a comeback

I don’t think that “liberal feminists” think you can be a conservative AND a feminist.

I know. That’s why when Palin made it an issue in her latest book, everyone was like huh? What’s that?

I don’t hunt and have never shot a gun (it’s on my bucket list of things to do in life) but there is this notion that you can’t play in the mud or shoot guns and then look pretty after. As I said, this a similar storyline as to those people that eat organic but then have a problem with someone physically shooting the animal for their own consumption.

WCinWI said:
WCinWI says

I’m sorry you are so insecure about your looks.I’m sure you have other quilities going for you.Just as i am sure Palin and Bachmann would like people to understand they have more than just “looks” going for them.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Paul, I do agree that Hillary gets a wee bit of heat from some in the media, but you aren’t saying it’s anywhere near what conservative woman get, are you?

I think there’s also this notion that when liberal women talk back, they’re being strong and smart. However, if a conservative talks back, they’re being combative and snarky. Something to that effect at least.

ROCKSTEADY said:
I’m sorry you are so insecure about your looks.I’m sure you have other quilities going for you.Just as i am sure Palin and Bachmann would like people to understand they have more than just “looks” going for them.

Learn to spell. Seriously.

Grammie said:
Let me rephrase that for you Paul and see what you think of it then:

.
People find Michelle OBAMA attractive? I find that hard to believe, and suggesting that there is not legitimate criticism of OBAMA is totally ridiculous and stupid

It is ridiculous and stupid to suggest that there is not legitimate criticism of Michelle Obama.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Paul, I do agree that Hillary gets a wee bit of heat from some in the media, but you aren’t saying it’s anywhere near what conservative woman get, are you?

Something we’ll never agree on.

WCinWI said:
Seriously.

Your a sad man.

BillO is right on. Most of Sarah & Michele’s male critics are virility-challenged indoorsmen, and their female critics are frumpy & jealous.

paulmdoro said:
It is ridiculous and stupid to suggest that there is not legitimate criticism of Michelle Obama.

.
You missed the point.

If any of the conserv commenters here opened up with:

“People find Michelle OBAMA attractive? I find that hard to believe”

what reaction would they get from the Libs here and everywhere else.

Have you noticed that the least criticism of the FLOTUS has been met with absolutely raging cries of racism.

paulmdoro says:
Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Paul, I do agree that Hillary gets a wee bit of heat from some in the media, but you aren’t saying it’s anywhere near what conservative woman get, are you?

Something we’ll never agree on.

So you don’t think conservative woman are vilified more in the media? Just want to make sure I have your position correct.

WCinWI said:
there is this notion that you can’t play in the mud or shoot guns and then look pretty after.

You must be a city girl. Country girls can do this. The outdoors does not scare them. What was funny about Falin’s show was how obvious a tenderfoot she was at all the things “they do all the time”. She talks a good game.

So far, the two female “leading lights” of conservativism, Falin and Bachmann, are more famous for being caught not knowing what they should know than displaying their acumen in public. Y’all keep lovin’ on them though. As I said, laughter is good for the soul.

Grammie said:
.
You missed the point.

If any of the conserv commenters here opened up with:

“People find Michelle OBAMA attractive? I find that hard to believe”

what reaction would they get from the Libs here and everywhere else.

Have you noticed that the least criticism of the FLOTUS has been met with absolutely raging cries of racism.

No I have not noticed that. I don’t read about the FLOTUS too often. Her husband is in the news far more frequently.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
paulmdoro says:
Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Paul, I do agree that Hillary gets a wee bit of heat from some in the media, but you aren’t saying it’s anywhere near what conservative woman get, are you?

Something we’ll never agree on.

So you don’t think conservative woman are vilified more in the media? Just want to make sure I have your position correct.

No.

Then yep, this is one issue we won’t agree on.

I find Radical Madcow attractive, oh wait, she not a woman…… LMAO

chatmandu002 said:
I find Radical Madcow attractive, oh wait, she not a woman…… LMAO

You are a pig!

Beauty is only skin deep anyway. The King loves me for my mind.

Bill would just LOVE to rub falafels all over both of them, no doubt.

of course they are attacked. By the feminazi’s. They have a market on ugly and everyone knows politics is “Hollywood for the ugly.” Damn those babes for having brains.

chatmandu002 said:
I find Radical Madcow attractive, oh wait, she not a woman…… LMAO

Rachet Madcow might better change names to Paaaaaaaaat

BlackWidow said:
You are a pig!

No doubt, BW. That douche-bag is just jealous because Rachel gets more pussy than he ever could.

Bill O Reilly is like that loser that could not get a beautiful woman back in the days and now he still cant get women cos he his old, married and wrinkled. This insecurities is what makes him add unneccesary segments to his show so that he can have a chance to lust at dumb blondes that periodically appears on his shows. I swear he jerks off to the picture of a pregnant Megan kelly and smells her seat when she leaves the show( old pervert)
Dont you wonder why he has all these uninformative segments like “body language”, ” cultute quiz”, ” kellys segment” etc. If O Reilly was not a success at Foxnews, he would have been a REGISTERED Sex offender in Rhode Island.
How dumb or sex starved is Bill O Reilly to say unpolished Palin and black-hearted bachman get attached because they are attractve. No . They get attacked becos they are DUMB and Colorless.
I take an ugly duckling over a dumb disease infested faox news blonde anyday.

Mr.Papshmer said:
Please explain how they are bat shit crazy. I know that’s a fun phrase, and you think it makes you sound witty, but let’s have some particulars.

Bachmann’s stance on scaring people about the census is a good start. And if Palin ever finishes a sentence without using the word “also” and keeps it under 100 words let me know.

Proglib, if Obama ever finishes a sentence without using the phrase, “let me be clear”, you let me know.

I want to slit my own wrists every time I hear that. (Don’t get too excieted brainstem, I wouldn’t do that).

Publius219 said:
They get attacked because they say irresponsible things and blatantly make stuff up, regularly.

ONLY in the liberal mind. You have the lib gene and it is impossible for you to know what is true. YOU just make it up.

Of course it is because they are attractive. It is the same reason all the libs here attack me.

Publius219 said:
No no. They’re prominent because they’re attractive. They’re criticized because they’re stupid.

Bingo

Totally disagree!

Pelosi is repulsive and she gets attacked!

ProgLib said:
Bachmann’s stance on scaring people about the census is a good start. And if Palin ever finishes a sentence without using the word “also” and keeps it under 100 words let me know.

Wow, well pardon me, you certainly have made your case that both of them are bat shit crazy. One completely nebulous statement regarding your dislike of Bachmann, and the fact that you don’t like listening to hearing Palin speak. Man, wtf was I thinking?

minorityreport said:
I take an ugly duckling over a dumb disease infested faox news blonde anyday.

You do that everyday.

Go back to your coma,son.

chatmandu002 said:
I find Radical Madcow attractive, oh wait, she not a woman…… LMAO

LOL that says more about you than it does her…..

gordonbloyershow said:
Of course it is because they are attractive. It is the same reason all the libs here attack me.

We criticize you and them for the same reason, and it has nothing to do with looks…..

notsofast said:
You do that everyday.

Go back to your coma,son.

notsofast said:
You do that everyday.

Go back to your coma,son.

Being in coma is better than what you call life Loser!!!
This is what your day is like:
Wake up in the morning, have sex with your sister and mother
then log on to mediate
take oxycotin
log on to mediate
attend a kkk meeting
go home and log on to mediate
pop some more oxycotin with zantrac
watch foxnews
walk your dog
come back home drink coffee
log on to mediate
pop more drugs
watch more fox news
log back on to mediate
PEOPLE LIKE YOU IS THE REASON UNEMPLOYMENTS IS HIGH……….
GET UP AND MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF THE 15 MONTHS EFT IN YOUR MISERABLE LIFE LOSERRRRR

notsofast said:
You do that everyday.

Go back to your coma,son.

The Tea Weasel said:
We criticize you and them for the same reason, and it has nothing to do with looks…

Hey, son, do you think is because of their color and not their looks?

I bet it is!

minorityreport said:
Being in coma is better than what you call life Loser!!!

You do both: you are a loser in a coma, son!

Obama has criticized both of them so it must be racism.

Notsofasr , should that not be notsosmart? or notsoinformed or notsoeducated or better yet notsosane and notsostable…

This is news. Someone thinks Sarah and Michelle are attractive? I guess if you like pounds of make-up schmeared on, cans of AquaNet sprayed on, trashy clothes put on and crazed eyes looking out. But, I’m still in love with my wife. And, Mrs. Robinson.

minorityreport said:
Notsofasr , should that not be notsosmart? or notsoinformed or notsoeducated or better yet notsosane and notsostable…

I generally, or as Michelle-in-Utah might say, genually, call him Nutsofast, but I am much drawn to Notsostable. I may consider using that.

The Real Royal King said:
I generally, or as Michelle-in-Utah might say, genually, call him Nutsofast, but I am much drawn to Notsostable. I may consider using that.

Maybe it’s just me, but nottoswift (my pet-name for him) really sounds a lot like El Gordo, I think.

minorityreport said:
Notsofasr , should that not be notsosmart? or notsoinformed or notsoeducated or better yet notsosane and notsostable…

I love tearing you up , son!

Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

The Real Royal King said:
This is news. Someone thinks Sarah and Michelle are attractive? I guess if you like pounds of make-up schmeared on, cans of AquaNet sprayed on, trashy clothes put on and crazed eyes looking out. But, I’m still in love with my wife. And, Mrs. Robinson.

Back at ya’ KingyPoo.

notsofast said:
I love tearing you up , son!

Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Grand Pa, the kids are coming to take you to a retirement home by monday. I suggested a mental institution but I am guessing there is no cure for your mental sickness. even with all the republican ideas for healthcare, you would still be left behind sickooooooo

The Real Royal King said:
or as Michelle-in-Utah might say

Curious, why do you even do that? Do you think that somehow you’ve stumbled onto some secret that you feel compelled to share? That like, you’re holding that over her head? Really man, no one cares.

Beauty is only skin deep. Both women may be attractive on the outside, but from the ugly rhetoric they spew, are ugly on the inside.

Hugo Daun said:
Maybe it’s just me, but nottoswift (my pet-name for him) really sounds a lot like El Gordo, I think.

Certainly both crazed and puerile, but I would need to see Notsoswift in and orange prison jumpsuit before I decide.

Hey is this the conservative version of ” you’re only attacking him because he’s black”?

No BillO, it’s because they have all the brain power of a felafel. Simple as that.

SarahP. said:
No BillO, it’s because they have all the brain power

We agree!

JamesA1102 said:
Beauty is only skin deep.

James…thanks for explaining….

At 2:58 into this vid, I had to look at your explaination James…I think I see what you are saying….I think!
http://vodpod.com/watch/3254802-republican-vs-democrat-women

BatBoy said:
At 2:58 into this vid, I had to look at your explaination James…I think I see what you are saying….I think!

.
You so bad! I mean really really bad.

I’m ashamed to admit that I laughed so hard.

Did you notice that Helen Thomas is far from a shoo in in that group.

Bachmann gets crap because she has a perfect record of never telling the truth:

http://gripernews.blogspot.com/2011/01/news-roundup-for-12111.html

Palin gets it because she’s trying to break that record.

hey papsmear…

He’s referring to the poster thats used multiple names, everyone knows it’s the same person. If you watch, you can tell and its obvious. Maybe not to you, noob.

gordonbloyershow said:
Of course it is because they are attractive. It is the same reason all the libs here attack me.

I suppose you find Sharon Angle attractive too? Or Jan Brewer? The reason you get attacked is because you do things like mischaracterize Giffords’ record.

CNN bashes America in survey about “cool” countries.
http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/2011/01/cnn-bashes-america-in-survey-about-cool.html

Royal Queen, you’re so lucky that your husband is an expert on women’s fashion, makeup, and hair styles. Probably almost makes up for that lack of interest in…..other areas.

Attractive?? When? Where? But then, hillbillies can’t be particular. The woods are lonely, dark and deep.

writer said:
Royal Queen, you’re so lucky that your husband is an expert on women’s fashion, makeup, and hair styles. Probably almost makes up for that lack of interest in…..other areas.

The King actually does my hair and makeup for me, and picks out my wardrobe.
His lack of interest…in other areas…has increased greatly since McCain picked Sarah Palin for VP, and even more so since Dancing With The Stars.

Now here are two women that I would vote for. Both intelligent, and pretty, and both are women that put America and Americans first.

Here, in it’s most clear example is “hatemonger” number #1: The Real Royal King says:
January 21, 2011 at 5:47 pm The Real Royal King(Quote)
Thumb up 7 Thumb down 12

This is news. Someone thinks Sarah and Michelle are attractive? I guess if you like pounds of make-up schmeared on, cans of AquaNet sprayed on, trashy clothes put on and crazed eyes looking out. But, I’m still in love with my wife. And, Mrs. Robinson.

You must look in the mirror and see ugly therefore, you can’t stand pretty and attractive.

But, to continue: it is not only that both are Republicans, both conservative, both attractive…but they are women!! Generally, the the Uberprogressive Left does not do well with women….females, yes, but not women. These two gals are simply NOT what the NOW Movement was all about in the l960-70′s…I was a co-founder of a NOW Chapter in West Los Angeles and I can promise you, this is not what the girls were working on. They expected the “poor” and “minority” girls to take advantage of every handout out there so that their “projects” funded by daddy, uncle, boyfriend or husband would get grants. Every single one of them came from money in one way or another which made me wonder why they ever allowed me in…I was the “poor” girl they could slobber over. It didn’t take me long to figure out their game so I quit the movement and have never regretted it. I have watched as the women of this country have been scorned from every progressive corner if they didn’t subscribe to the “welfare” mentality. Prove me wrong!!! Anyone????

Sue said:
But, to continue: it is not only that both are Republicans, both conservative, both attractive…but they are women!! Generally, the the Uberprogressive Left does not do well with women….females, yes, but not women. These two gals are simply NOT what the NOW Movement was all about in the l960-70’s…I was a co-founder of a NOW Chapter in West Los Angeles and I can promise you, this is not what the girls were working on. They expected the “poor” and “minority” girls to take advantage of every handout out there so that their “projects” funded by daddy, uncle, boyfriend or husband would get grants. Every single one of them came from money in one way or another which made me wonder why they ever allowed me in…I was the “poor” girl they could slobber over. It didn’t take me long to figure out their game so I quit the movement and have never regretted it. I have watched as the women of this country have been scorned from every progressive corner if they didn’t subscribe to the “welfare” mentality. Prove me wrong!!! Anyone????

You’re offering a personal opinion based on an anecdote. Since you didn’t prove anything there’s really nothing for anybody to prove wrong.

No wonder I’m *never* attacked.

Now I know why Barbara Mikulsky and Shiela (rope head) Jackson Lee are never attacked. Apparently, stupidity alone is insufficient reason.

Sue said:
You must look in the mirror and see ugly therefore, you can’t stand pretty and attractive.

I like you. Your statements and observations are born of pragmatism and objective thought.