Good – glad to hear it.

Chris Matthews’ prayers have been answered.

She’s like Sarah Palin. Except not from Canada. And not as hot. But “smarter”.

Publius219 said:
She’s like Sarah Palin. Except not from Canada. And not as hot. But “smarter”.

what?

ANYONE on that stage would be light years better than OZero.

Sorry Palin, Game over.

Liberal Tormentor said:
ANYONE on that stage would be light years better than OZero.

that was funny

Friendly advice: Do not get between The Divine One and a camera for the next few days.
Collateral damage is inevitable.

OMG

The debates are HILARIOUS

Are you all watching. Laugh out loud hilarious:’funnier than Bridesmaids!!

Anyone saw Cain when they asked him about the Muslim thing?
Funny s$%t right there.
Poor guy was pedaling like crazy.

Ladies and gentlemen,Hello everybody,
input this URL: === http://globalsell.org/ ===
shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.
you can find many cheap and fashion stuff (jor dan shoes)
(NBA NFL NHL MLB jersey)
( lv handbag)
(cha nel wallet)
(D&G sunglasses)
(ed har dy jacket)
(UGG boot)
and so on..welcome to our website:
( http://globalsell.org/)
we sincerely hope to establish the business relation with you.
Looking forward your visit.

LMAO! NEXT!

Bachmann and Romney won the debate , hands down .

If I understand what they said, it was: If we lower taxes on the wealthy, everything will be right in America.

Didn’t seem to be much more.

BTW: The Newt was far and away the best debater out of the lot, in a technical, debate rules sense. Backhand was #2.

T-Paw was the next to the worst, and Kane was the worst, hand down. T-Paw was a tremendous disappointment. I want to like him. Substance baffles and eludes him.

Eddie Haskell gave me the creeps, as usual.

Glackin said:
Friendly advice: Do not get between The Divine One and a camera for the next few days.Collateral damage is inevitable.

Sage advice.

Did Bachmann say she wanted to change the Constitution but she wouldn’t force the States abide by it?

Nacho said:
Did Bachmann say she wanted to change the Constitution but she wouldn’t force the States abide by it?

I’m still scratching my head over that. I think that is exactly what she said. I guess she must be thinking the ratification of the 14 Amendment is suspect. Perhaps, ACORN or the NBPP.

Bachmann and Palin share fundamental character flaws — both have a propensity toward making snide, petty comments about those with whom they disagree, neither does her homework before making public comments regarding important social and historical events, and neither is mature enough to accept responsibility for her own mistakes, failures, and shortcomings.

Remember, Michele Bachmann is the self-anointed Queen of White Tea (a variety that is easily over-brewed, becoming very bitter).

Bachmann has a penchant for taking unsubstantiated, isolated anecdotal accounts (as well as her own ignorance) and using them as the basis for formulating public policy. Who needs verifiable evidence, unbiased data, and fact-checking when you can rely upon highly speculative supposition and inflammatory innuendo instead?

Bachmann’s m.o. is to promote irrational fear — delusional nonsense about taking up arms against census takers, the government sending people to internment camps, progressives in Congress having unAmerican motives, repealing the U.S. Senate, encouraging her constituents to be armed and dangerous, etc. She seems to regard Joseph McCarthy as a role model.

For someone who claims to be so knowledgable about the U.S. Constitution and indignantly points her finger at the “tyrannical conduct” of the Obama Administration, Bachmann sure is fond of making comments suggesting that what the nation really needs is a good old fashioned coup.

labman57 said:
Bachmann has a penchant for taking unsubstantiated, isolated anecdotal accounts (as well as her own ignorance) and using them as the basis for formulating public policy. Who needs verifiable evidence, unbiased data, and fact-checking when you can rely upon highly speculative supposition and inflammatory innuendo instead?

In other words, she is Raygun’s true successor.

John King did so poorly, I hope this is his last moderation of a Presidential debate.

The Loser in the New Hampshire Republican Presidential Debate was CNN’s John King

felixw said:
Chris Matthews’ prayers have been answered.

I’m not sure about that. On CNN they are raving on how good she did on tonight’s debate.

Glackin said:
Friendly advice: Do not get between The Divine One and a camera for the next few days.
Collateral damage is inevitable.

Yah I would imagine he’ll be on tomorrow being bright and witty. Can hardly wait.

labman57 said:
Bachmann and Palin share fundamental character flaws — both have a propensity toward making snide, petty comments about those with whom they disagree, neither does her homework before making public comments regarding important social and historical events, and neither is mature enough to accept responsibility for her own mistakes, failures, and shortcomings.

Remember, Michele Bachmann is the self-anointed Queen of White Tea (a variety that is easily over-brewed, becoming very bitter).

Bachmann has a penchant for taking unsubstantiated, isolated anecdotal accounts (as well as her own ignorance) and using them as the basis for formulating public policy. Who needs verifiable evidence, unbiased data, and fact-checking when you can rely upon highly speculative supposition and inflammatory innuendo instead?

Bachmann’s m.o. is to promote irrational fear — delusional nonsense about taking up arms against census takers, the government sending people to internment camps, progressives in Congress having unAmerican motives, repealing the U.S. Senate, encouraging her constituents to be armed and dangerous, etc. She seems to regard Joseph McCarthy as a role model.

For someone who claims to be so knowledgable about the U.S. Constitution and indignantly points her finger at the “tyrannical conduct” of the Obama Administration, Bachmann sure is fond of making comments suggesting that what the nation really needs is a good old fashioned coup.

Your t.v. must have had a different set of people on. Mine showed Bachmann very bright and articulate and came out as a star. Maybe if you got satellite?

Best part of the debate was when she was asked by a guy about the gay marriage law in NH. She said as Presidnet she wouldn’t go into indiviual states and change their laws. She then said said she supported a constitutional ammendment that would define marriage as being between a man and a woman. Which would, of course, go in and change the law in NH.

Well, she spoke well and is more of a hottie in my eyes than palin..

She’s a fake. A “constitutional” Tea Party candidate who voted for the Patriot Act.

I didn’t like the format at all! Because of such formats, our campaigns have become too sound bite oriented. While it is good to be succinct in one’s answers, some questions simply cannot be answered in 30 seconds. The major fault with sound bites is that it allows anyone with an opposing view to take the abbreviated remarks totally out of context.

My preference would be to extend the debate to three hours, limit the number of questions (especially questions from people who don’t know how to ask a question that will garner a succinct answer) and to allow each candidate a reasonable amount of time to provide concise answers. The moderator would be allowed to remind the candidate to not stray from the topic.

All candidates showed strengths and weaknesses–some of those were noted in previous posts–but none hit more home runs than Cain and Paul. The problem is, most Americans are too reliant on our nanny government to embrace their message.

It was good to finally hear some of the candidates acknowledge that overregulation has played a major role in running our manufacturing and heavy industries offshore–this message needs to be amplified. Perhaps a “useful” sound bite would be to point out how long it has been since one could buy a TV that was made in the USA.

Social issues are most often lightning rods that moderators use to give people reasons to NOT vote for one candidate or another and given the dire straits of our economy, it would probably better serve our interests to lay off the social issues and concentrate on the economic issues.

When is mediaite going to do a piece on “Operation Fast & Furious?” You know, the one where our ATF put thousands of guns in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels–some of which are known to have been used to murder Americans–which was actually an attempt to attack our 2nd Amendment rights. I guess mediaite doesn’t want to give any bad press to the DOJ, huh?

Harold Camping may have been wrong about Armageddon, but the end of America as we know
is coming.

Believe your “Team America F@#* Yeah” as much as you want,

But India and China laugh in our faces and we deserve it. This will not end well.

The American Empire is on life support. The comments by many at Mediaite are example #1.

Nature Freak said:

India and China laugh in our faces and we deserve it. This will not end well.

The American Empire is on life support. The comments by many at Mediaite are example #1.

Look, we might have “stupid” in the Whitrehouse and congress, but I doubt we are laughed at. India and china still have to go thru the Democracy thing… believe me..they have their hands full.

India is still in our 50-60′s stage.. they are beating gatherings of more than 5.. Hmm… and they will laugh at us?

Make no mistake..Bachmann is a babe..but a president she will never be… It’s our country and we can poke fun at everyone.. but outsiders can’t..;)

I hate to say it but Bachmann was very impressive, I think she could be the big surprise and get the nomination. She is everything Sarah Palin isn’t although they are usually unfairly compared to each other. Bachmann isn’t afraid of the “lamestream media”, she goes on hostile programs like Chris Matthews and she didn’t equivocate on one question the entire night, except for the Elvis vs. Johnny Cash question which is a pretty hard question to answer IMO.

Watch this woman, she could get the nomination.

Nature Freak said:
Harold Camping may have been wrong about Armageddon, but the end of America as we know
is coming.

Believe your “Team America F@#* Yeah” as much as you want,

But India and China laugh in our faces and we deserve it. This will not end well.

The American Empire is on life support. The comments by many at Mediaite are example #1.

Very true and the sick and unamerican thing is that many of them want our country to fail, just to score cheap political points.

I guess they don’t realize that if the country fails, then no more country, your partisan politics will be meaningless.

She announced she’s running for president, is taking place in a presidential debate; but will make a “formal announcement” later?

WHY? wasn’t that an announcement last night? How many times does she have to announce?

Amazing how many debaters WERE NOT WEARING FLAG PINS LAST NIGHT

I think the bigger Bachman announcement last night was that she HAS 30 KIDS?!?!??

Republican Party has always been a vast breeding ground for Patriots & Heroes. See RayGun, both BushDrunks, McCain, et al. Your bridge to the 12th Century. Time Marches Backwards.

I think Michele was smart enough to go on Matthews sort of like batting practice, to rehearse handling rough BS questions while nobody was watching. Serves her well now that she’s actually got a hit in the first inning.

Fact: I liked it sense it took away somebody’s bone for later in the night. She was straight speaker but all candidates on that stage was weak in space exploration for USA’s future.

Will she be weak and bow to foreign leaders?
Does she know how many States there are?

Bill Huggins said:
I think the bigger Bachman announcement last night was that she HAS 30 KIDS?!?!??

Yep, and they are all adopted form Liberals who abandoned them!