This farce actually AIRED?…on a so-called NEWS channel? John Stossel is a total ass and the fact that Ron Paul assented to this sideshow makes me lose what little respect I had left for the guy.

The fair-and-balanced folks on FOX PAC have found their calling — street theater.

Yeah. You guys are critical of things like the actor’s makeup, but what about the truth of the words spoken? And why were you not as harsh about Colbert’s appearance in front of the goddamned REAL U.S. Congress “pretending” to be a conservative?

Get with it, guys. This is real life here, talking about real death and taxes. It’s not funny any more.

The US public needs to understand that we are talking about serious stuff here – people are dying. Keep playing games, and other national interests will take this beautiful countryside away from us. Will we die at their hands, while we are still arguing over what the word “is” is? Remember what makes this country great is its people. Once these wonderful people are gone (or killed by a dirty bomb) then the only thing left is a great place to grow corn for the nutritional needs of billions of other people. And that way, those big ships will have something to fill them on the return trip, which they do not have today.

Think about it, please.

and p.s. “Most of his words tonight were the direct words from the real Barack Obama” and you also know that the words were also from the real Ron Paul, M.D., U.S. Congressman, and the reactions from the audience were from real average people in the USA who give a **** about these things. What higher authority do you want before you believe this is truth?

Don’t go accusing Fox News of being “not a news channel” until you are ready to defend “Comedy Central” for being “not very funny” because they aren’t funny, any more than Fox is news.

IT IS TV FOR GODS SAKE

The real thing involves blood.

Any rational person realizes that paul, who actually occasionally has some good ideas (like stopping the out-of-control, reckless, irresponsible, big-bank-profits-supporting federal reserve), is basically a flake who is best ignored

ron paul couldn’t win a NATIONAL ELECTION even if his were the ONLY name on the ballot.

The responsible conservative movement is committed to having candidates for president that can actually WIN A NATIONAL ELECTION, yet remain true to conservative principles and ideals, and not supporting a fringe ideologue like the lunatic-left d-crat socialists do.

Ron Paul says “If someone has made all of their profits on taxpayers back, I’m taxing them,” and receives applause, and Barack Obama says he wants to repeal Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans and is vilified as a typical tax-and-spend liberal. Just the fact the faux-Obama was booed when he came on stage tells you all you need to know about the merit of this “debate”.

From the allegory of the cave…

“[Socrates] And if they were in the habit of conferring honors among themselves on those who were quickest to observe the passing shadows and to remark which of them went before, and which followed after, and which were together; and who were therefore best able to draw conclusions as to the future, do you think that he would care for such honors and glories, or envy the possessors of them? Would he not say with Homer,

Better to be the poor servant of a poor master,

and to endure anything, rather than think as they do and live after their manner?”

This thing is extremely embarrassing.

I love how Ron Paul says we’re over-regulated, or insinuates the financial breakdown was somehow caused by too much regulation!!!

Whether you favor Barack Obama or Ron Paul doesn’t really matter because they are both way too extreme, at opposite ens of the spectrum to get a ______ing thing done in this country.

In either case Obama or Paul, as far as getting something, anything done that actually benefits ALL the American people, even those loser democrats instead of just their own personal, misguided ideologies it’ll be a case of nothing from nothing…….leaves us right where we are today, with nothing.

Neither one is to fond of doing things the ” American Way ” and that’s just not going to work in the real world. Maybe the two of them can get together and devepop a video game where their seperate yet equally whacky ideologies battle it out for world domination. The slackers and hipsters would pre order millions of copies and sleep out in front of Walmart and Best Buy to be the first under their bridge or in the row of dumpsters to snag a copy.

A major republican candidate debating the words of the President. The absurdity! We need more Donald Trump and Royal Wedding coverage!

This was Awesome! Only Stossel would have the courage to do something like this. Given that the Pres would never engage in an open discussion with anyone that disagrees with him, this is all we have.

ElCapitanAmerica said:
This thing is extremely embarrassing.

I love how Ron Paul says we’re over-regulated, or insinuates the financial breakdown was somehow caused by too much regulation!!!

ElCapitanAmerica:

The financial breakdown was not caused by a lack of regulation. You’ve already got regulation. You’ve got regulation and the “financial breakdowns” keep happening. So if anyone has anything to answer for, it’s you interventionists.

The financial breakdown was caused by The Fed and The Federal Government. The government for CREATING the housing crises, the fed for providing the boost necessary to begin the boom and then the moral hazard that comes with knowing they’ll always ensure those at the top get bailed out of thier failed policies.

When you let businesses fail – that’s the ultimate form of “regulation”.

Why do you even care about regulation, when you have the government so deeply involved in our economy that we can’t afford to regulate them? Seriously, if they were to actually REGULATE most of these banks they’d ALL go under and then who’d be on the hook for them in your stupid interventionist society? WE WOULD.

NOW THAT’S EMBARRASSING!

As much as I like Ron Paul, this video makes me realize that he doesn’t have a chance in hell.. I mean, he even comes across weak with fake Obama let alone the real one

To Levi,

Ron Paul has some great ideas, but he never has nor never will have a chance of being elected. Some have it and some don’t. He simply does not. All we really need is for a couragous Conservative to stand up and speak many of these ideas,……………who is electable.

So far the only one I can see is Ambassador-Governor Jon Huntsman.

Some of you are denying reality. You’re striving to live in a world where the way you see it, is the way it is, rather than the other way around. Greed? Greed is demanding the rich pay more in taxes, so you can then steal their money and use it for yourself and wants.

Barack Must Go said:
Whether you favor Barack Obama or Ron Paul doesn’t really matter because they are both way too extreme, at opposite ens of the spectrum to get a ______ing thing done in this country.

In either case Obama or Paul, as far as getting something, anything done that actually benefits ALL the American people, even those loser democrats instead of just their own personal, misguided ideologies it’ll be a case of nothing from nothing…….leaves us right where we are today, with nothing.

Neither one is to fond of doing things the ” American Way ” and that’s just not going to work in the real world. Maybe the two of them can get together and devepop a video game where their seperate yet equally whacky ideologies battle it out for world domination. The slackers and hipsters would pre order millions of copies and sleep out in front of Walmart and Best Buy to be the first under their bridge or in the row of dumpsters to snag a copy.

BarackMustGo:

President Obama is very mainstream. He’s a socialist, but most Americans are as well. He’s pro-war, but so are most Americans. He is a mirror-image of our deepest illogical inconsistancies. Ron Paul on the other hand represents the message and principles WE NEED, and not want.

You keep reference getting things done. They’ve been GETTING THINGS DONE. What you don’t seem to understand is that bi-partisanship has served to only grow the very defecit everyone claims to wanna cut. Bi-Partisanship says one side wants to spend money on welfare and the other on warfare. They get together and decide to spend money on BOTH. Is it no wonder we’re on the verge of bankruptcy? And yet, you want MORE of that wonderful bi-partisanship?

In your world the road blocks are removed from government and next thing you know you’ll have government involved and doing things it was never intended to do. Ironically, it tends to become extreme. I hope you enjoy our continual war in the middle east because it’s a direct result of GETTING THINGS DONE. I hope you enjoy our pathetic Obama-Care system, because it’s GETTING THIGNS DONE. I hope you enjoy the Patriot Act – GETTING THINGS DONE.

How about, instead of just GETTING “THINGS” done, how about we do the RIGHT THINGS and PROTECT FREEDOM AND LIBERTY INSTEAD? I’ve had enough of you interventionists. It’s time you grow up and understand the society you’re creating. The world is not how you SEE IT, it’s how it IS.

hunterwilkinson said:
This was Awesome! Only Stossel would have the courage to do something like this. Given that the Pres would never engage in an open discussion with anyone that disagrees with him, this is all we have.

I’m sure the President and members of the administration meet with Republican members of Congress pretty regularly. In fact, Boehner, Cantor and others will be having dinner with him on Monday night.

btimsah said:
Some of you are denying reality. You’re striving to live in a world where the way you see it, is the way it is, rather than the other way around. Greed? Greed is demanding the rich pay more in taxes, so you can then steal their money and use it for yourself and wants.
BarackMustGo:

President Obama is very mainstream. He’s a socialist, but most Americans are as well. He’s pro-war, but so are most Americans. He is a mirror-image of our deepest illogical inconsistancies. Ron Paul on the other hand represents the message and principles WE NEED, and not want.

You keep reference getting things done. They’ve been GETTING THINGS DONE. What you don’t seem to understand is that bi-partisanship has served to only grow the very defecit everyone claims to wanna cut. Bi-Partisanship says one side wants to spend money on welfare and the other on warfare. They get together and decide to spend money on BOTH. Is it no wonder we’re on the verge of bankruptcy? And yet, you want MORE of that wonderful bi-partisanship?

In your world the road blocks are removed from government and next thing you know you’ll have government involved and doing things it was never intended to do. Ironically, it tends to become extreme. I hope you enjoy our continual war in the middle east because it’s a direct result of GETTING THINGS DONE. I hope you enjoy our pathetic Obama-Care system, because it’s GETTING THIGNS DONE. I hope you enjoy the Patriot Act – GETTING THINGS DONE.

How about, instead of just GETTING “THINGS” done, how about we do the RIGHT THINGS and PROTECT FREEDOM AND LIBERTY INSTEAD? I’ve had enough of you interventionists. It’s time you grow up and understand the society you’re creating. The world is not how you SEE IT, it’s how it IS.

Don’t hurt yourself getting down off your milk crate ( I don’t believe they make soap boxes anymore ).

The problem that a couple a fellers like Ron and yourself have never thought about, or di but ignore. Is the fact that unless you guys have figured out a way to kill off all the ever expanding class of poor people in this country your utopian society, just like Obama’s at the opposite end of the spectrum are simply ‘ pie in the sky ‘ bullshitting yourselves.

Reality is taking what you’ve been dealt and dealing with it in the most cost effective, best for all, not just your own special ( Ed’s ) or interest groups and nothing Paul or Obama even come close….like on a different planet not close.

This isn’t even worth commenting about. Fox had some air time they needed filling.

Barack Must Go said:
Don’t hurt yourself getting down off your milk crate ( I don’t believe they make soap boxes anymore ).

The problem that a couple a fellers like Ron and yourself have never thought about, or di but ignore. Is the fact that unless you guys have figured out a way to kill off all the ever expanding class of poor people in this country your utopian society, just like Obama’s at the opposite end of the spectrum are simply ‘ pie in the sky ‘ bullshitting yourselves.

Reality is taking what you’ve been dealt and dealing with it in the most cost effective, best for all, not just your own special ( Ed’s ) or interest groups and nothing Paul or Obama even come close….like on a different planet not close.

Libertarians don’t believe in a Utopian world, you interventionists do, that’s why you try to intervene. And it’s not I, or Ron Paul who want poor to stay poor or else we’d support welfare. Nothing keeps people poor, better than welfare.

btimsah said:
ElCapitanAmerica:

The financial breakdown was not caused by a lack of regulation. You’ve already got regulation. You’ve got regulation and the “financial breakdowns” keep happening. So if anyone has anything to answer for, it’s you interventionists.

The financial breakdown was caused by The Fed and The Federal Government. The government for CREATING the housing crises, the fed for providing the boost necessary to begin the boom and then the moral hazard that comes with knowing they’ll always ensure those at the top get bailed out of thier failed policies.

When you let businesses fail – that’s the ultimate form of “regulation”.

Why do you even care about regulation, when you have the government so deeply involved in our economy that we can’t afford to regulate them? Seriously, if they were to actually REGULATE most of these banks they’d ALL go under and then who’d be on the hook for them in your stupid interventionist society? WE WOULD.

NOW THAT’S EMBARRASSING!

You are kind of half right only with that crazy Ron Paul interventionist bullshit woven in to confuse things.

The only reason we had the pseudo crisis that then turned into a full blown crisis was that the federal government panicked and let everyone in the banking and free world know they panicked about the possibility of a sub prime real estate melt down which immediately became a self fufilling prophecy.

It truly had nothing to do with the big banks other than the government overnight stopped doing any business between the fed and these banks.

This set a chain of events in motion that wasn’t going to bring the banks down and the government intervened to save THEM ( banks ). It was the complete opposite way around. The banks saved our federal government and in turn our country from bankruptcy.

Banks, all banks were forced by the Barney Frank, Kent Conrad and Chris Dodd democrat majority to knowingly take bad paper ( sub prime ) minority mortgages if they wanted to stay in business. The government ran an extortion ring of sorts all in a quid pro quo effort to garner the minority vote throughout every segment of this growing cross section of the population throughout the country.

The banks reluctantly participated, but only to the extent that the feds put up a pre established amount of cash and the banks lent the feds money for a handsome fee and when that money ran out the banks bundled this shit paper all together and sold it, with the full knowledge of Barney Frank et al to me & you through our 401 K mutual funds. Once these 70% bad loans were dumped the banks took another pile of cash and duplicated the process, as they had no choice but to do so or lose all other financing from the fed.

When the bottom finally fell out AIG was made the scapegoat and all the large bank were too just to a lesser degree.

All of that bad paper still in the pipe line was fully insured by the federal government through insurance policies and reinsurance policies underwritten by AIG.

It was the government who was in jepardy of defaulting on these fully back loans who turned to the banks asking them to cooperate by taking TARP money, forcing those that refused to keep things from really imploding.

The banks, other than City and I believe one other didn’t even need the money and immediately turmned it back with millions to the government in interest. Interest that Obama put away in a slush fund somewhere instead of returning it to the TARP.

btimsah said:
Libertarians don’t believe in a Utopian world, you interventionists do, that’s why you try to intervene. And it’s not I, or Ron Paul who want poor to stay poor or else we’d support welfare. Nothing keeps people poor, better than welfare.

Your answer to welfare is a good swift kick in the ass….Cuckoo…cuckoo….

Greg said:
Greg says:
April 30, 2011 at 2:07 pm Greg(Quote)
Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5

Son, your pomposity is very vapid.

I understand we’re having fun making all of these comments, but- in all honesty: how you guys actually done reserach into Ron Paul or his beliefs? I’m ont here to attack you, or to say you’re snobs or anything. I almost wrote him off as well… The more I learn about him though, the more I see that he’s a very wise individual (as best as I can surmise. Here are a few examples:

This is Ron Paul in 1998, stating that US sanctions and bombings in Iraq and other middle-eastern territories would increase the likelihood of a terrorist attack. It is for this reason he wanted Clinton impeached (he did not focus on sexual misconduct).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZtPzOukjZA

The next link is to a document where Ron Paul accurately predicts with crystal clarity that there will be a housing market crash. It also explains how it is he is able to presume this.

http://www.ronpaul.com/2008-09-26/ron-paul-on-the-housing-bubble-july-2002/

I’d also like to bring to everyone’s attention that Ron Paul voted against our involvement in Iraq, and he is an outspoken critic of Obama’s expansion of the wars in the middle east. In particular, he has said that the wars are unconstitutional because they are not declared by the congress. The most recent incident, in which Obama took the country to war in LIbya, was one in which Paul was most able to make his argument that the executive branch has taken too much power upon itself (and that the congress has become derelict in it’s duty to restrain it with it’s own powers). In fact, president Obama (while still a sitting senator) said that wars of the kind he just recently launched in Libya were unconstitutional. From what he says there, he advocates an almost Ron Paul like viewpoint of foreign affairs.

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2011/03/22/is-obamas-war-on-libya-constitutional

My thought is that most people here are under the impression that Paul is a classic republican who believes that everything will just be fine and dandy if the markets are left on thier own? And that we should be isolationists? And that we shouldn’t help our fellow man with welfare?

Ron Paul’s rebuttle to that is as follows:

In a free market, there are many ‘natural’ regulations by virtue of business sense. A great deal has to be done for a business to remain ‘in business,’ and that means fair and competitive prices. Further, it means good quality (because you don’t want to sell food to your customers that will kill them). Also, if regulatory powers of the kind that are usually given to the FEDs were used at much smaller levels, they could be used more appropriately and specifically. This is also defined as allowable in our constitution (because all duties not specified in the constitution are to be handed down to the states. Regulatin business is not one of them).

The interstate commerce portion of the constitution, too, was not (to my knowledge) created for the purpose of hindering states with trading with eachother or to allow the Federal government to regulate all aspects of it. Rather, it was enacted so that states would not prevent thier occupants from trading with others (as a sort of cheque against the states). Not to set a precedent for regulatory power.

Also, Ron Paul is not an “isolationist.” He is a non-interventionists. He beleives that we ought to be friends with countries and trade with them, like Canada. He does not, however, believe that we should enter into entangling alliances, or give money to other countries. In times of disaster, history has shown that the american people are very generous and actually give up to three times more than the federal government does. If we can do this- why do we need the government to give aid to these countries? And a lot of the money given by our government ends up going to puppet regimes (think of the millions given to Gaddafi or Muscharref). The penalty for intervening in other people’s affairs is a great one, as well. The motivations behind those who flew airplanes into the world trade center buildings, in large part, was a political one. They asked why we were so involved in affairs we had no business in. Funnelled into radical islam, they did terrible things. And Osama Bin Ladin has specifically stated that our actions in Iraq during the 90s was a primary mover in creating the plot for 9/11.

In fact, Osama Bin Ladin stated that his primary goals in the 9/11 attacks were to bait the US into a war that would drain resources, morale, money and american lives. He has been quite succesful, has he not? He has taken the lives of more troops than the number of civilians that died in 9/11. Our policing of the world has effectively doubled the number of casualties in the carnage since 9/11.

Also, as for Ron Paul’s take on the welfare state. He has not asked to savagely cut it, or to destroy it; rather he wishes to cut foreign affairs and militarism first. When it comes to social security in the like, he’d like to see them reduced and phased out over a 3 year period maybe. Otherwise, those who are over fifty, he’d like to honor their investments and get them paid back; but that means cutting in other places.

And is Ron Paul against defense? No- he’s against militarism. So when people say he wants to cut the defense budget, he actually wants to cut the militarism. The wars, etc, are costing us at home in ways we can’t fully undrestand yet. In time, we may have to take much more drastic action: that is why we ought to be acting now. Educate yourselves so you can make an informed decision about this man. He has a great deal of moral credibility, and consistency too (he’s never, in 20 years, voted to increase a tax. He’s also never voted to use drones in our over-seas adventures). He also voted against the patriot act! And, he’s the one person pushing to get a thorough audit of the Fed. In only the partial audit he has managed to get so far, documents have revealed that the FED is lending billions (if not trillions) of dollars to other central banks.

So- I don’t think he’s a loon, lol. I believe that if we want to be people of real moral value and wisdom, we need to consider this man for a moment. Like I said earlier- it’s fun to joke, but let’s not become a collective. We ought not to think in terms of a group, but to determine for ourselves what the truth is. Hope that stuff makes sense! I’m happy to field questions about his ideas, though :)

Magister said:
I’m sure the President and members of the administration meet with Republican members of Congress pretty regularly. In fact, Boehner, Cantor and others will be having dinner with him on Monday night.

Seriously, dinner? How did that “Beer Summit” turn out?
Not so good. Our nations race relations are worse today than in modern history, under a black Pres.

Dinners and Beer do not get things done and it really does not mean the Obama is working together with them. He continuously punishes people who speak out against him, ie, yesterday when he bannished a reporter for recording his speech. He refuses to grant federal relief to Texas for it’s fires because of a beef he has with the Texas Gov.

With all do respect, he never sits with anyone to compromise anything unless the compromise is all towards him.

If the “real” Obama is impersonating a President and Fox has an Obama impersonator should we worry about double agents?

notsofast said:
Son, your pomposity is very vapid.

From one who’s moronity is well documented.

Ron Paul is a nice decent guy; I think he got sucked into doing this for some false advertising after everyone forgets this was a joke. Ron Paul should have had John Stossel sign a promise to burn the tapes within 24 hours after they made them so they could not be accidently on purpose presented by mistake on a later show as we have seen Fox do about a year ago with large crowds at a gathering around the Washington Monument.

They’re turning this political theater into… well, political theater.

I actually thought Obama won this debate.

With Obama presumably running un-opposed in 2012, what’s to keep anti-war Democrats from voting in the GOP primaries? If Dems can get Gary Johnson on the GOP ticket, we’ll have two pro-choice, anti-war, drug reform, pro-equal rights candidates to choose from (provided Obama ever gets it together on the anti-war, drug reform side) … either way we win! :)http://bit.ly/g9d3So

Levin said:
Ron Paul says “If someone has made all of their profits on taxpayers back, I’m taxing them,” and receives applause, and Barack Obama says he wants to repeal Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans and is vilified as a typical tax-and-spend liberal. Just the fact the faux-Obama was booed when he came on stage tells you all you need to know about the merit of this “debate”.

Wanna lighten up a bit? It’s funny and it’s not even real. Remove the stick dude.

conservatives need fake debates to think they’ve won anything.

This is a good idea. Then if Obama gets a tough question, he can call in a stunt man.

Now the fake news and propaganda channel is offering fake debates. Makes sense.

GlennBeckReview said:
Now the fake news and propaganda channel is offering fake debates. Makes sense.

Sort of like…….pieces of garbage that say they have three hundred people reading their website down from thousands from the year before?

How about in reality NOBODY.

Yeah if anybody knows about fake and imaginary it’s you.

Makes Sense eh?

Oh my! How could I just say that? Didn’t somebody say they were going to do something to me last year?

To name just a few……

Obama = corporatist, neocon, keynesian,PRO TAX, PRO FED, PRO IRS, PRO Guantanamo Bay, etc.

Ron Paul = principles, honesty, sound economics, sound money, a non neocon, pro civil liberties, ANTI FED, etc.

puck30 says:

“Didn’t somebody say they were going to do something to me last year?”

Sounds like you need to get laid … and educated while you’re at it. “Pieces of garbage that say….” In my neighborhood, garbage doesn’t talk.

I DO know about fake and imaginary because I’m a Beckologist. Beck is a fake pundit and a real propagandist who fools the fools. That, it seems, would be you.

Get more details about Beck’s lies and hypocrisies today 7:30 p.m. at http://www.wicb.org. Click on “Listen Live.”

Oops, 7:30 p.m. EST, 4:30 p.m. PT

the reactionary puck30 says:
“Obama = corporatist, neocon, keynesian,PRO TAX, PRO FED, PRO IRS, PRO Guantanamo Bay, etc.”

Because Republicans would not allow Obama to close Gitmo, that doesn’t make him “PRO Guantanamo Bay.” Distort much?

the reactionary puck30 also says:
“Ron Paul = principles, honesty, sound economics, sound money, a non neocon, pro civil liberties, ANTI FED, etc.”

I must add: Glenn Beck = hypocrisy, dishonesty, “I have no idea what I’m doing with the economy….,” “BUY GOLD!,” pro-civil liberties unless the mob is against them, ANTI FED, anti-stabilization of the dollar or economy.

What you libertarian reactionary seem to forget is how much of a wild bull unregulated capitalism is, how many millions of people get destroyed due to no fault of their own during the bust side of cycles. You can have your Ron Paul purist, but history teaches that controlling the interest rates and money supply stabilizes the nasty booms and busts of laissez-faire capitalism. That’s why we do it differently now; that’s why Ron Paul’s economic theory is quaint at best and dangerous in practice.

GlennBeckReview said:
puck30 says:

“Didn’t somebody say they were going to do something to me last year?”

Sounds like you need to get laid … and educated while you’re at it.

Really? My whole life is not spent writing about one person.

And talking about getting laid? You couldn’t get laid if you stood outside a battered woman’s shelter with a limo, a dozen roses and fistfull of Dead Presidents.

Stupid sez: Because Republicans would not allow Obama to close Gitmo, that doesn’t make him “PRO Guantanamo Bay.” Distort much?

And how much crack did we smoke today?

Basement Dweller GBR sez:
“I must add: Glenn Beck……….”

Can’t get through without your Glenn Beck infactuation coming forth. Oh Moron! Got anything to say about this person and his selling Gold? He only has (as he claims) the #1 progressive radio show.

http://www.thomhartmann.com/

The basement dweller also said: “I DO know about fake and imaginary because I’m a Beckologist.” A WHAT? BLAH! HA! HA! Oh yeah there’s a high demand for that in the work field. What’s your experience? Sitting in your Mom’s basement pouring over Glenn Beck transcripts. Yeah, that will get you far, maybe as a jizz mopper at the ‘Book Sales Gallery’ after the boys from the Cargill salt mine get done there.
.

” In my neighborhood, garbage doesn’t talk.”

Must suck you have to wait till you get to the end of the block before you can say something.

GlennBeckReview said:
Get more details about Beck’s lies and hypocrisies today 7:30 p.m. at http://www.wicb.org. Click on “Listen Live.”

Just to let you know there where more people watching the Flying Skunk Farm Cam (22) then your doepy show (1) (which was probably you) at 7:55.

puck30 says:
“Just to let you know there where more people watching the Flying Skunk Farm Cam (22) then your doepy show (1) (which was probably you) at 7:55.”

No irrational anger here folk, just keep on moving. Beckerheads are such pricks, but that’s to be expected. Trying to defend the “honor” of a bald-faced liar is hard work:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/18/thedc-exclusive-conservatives-hit-beck-for-taking-content-without-attribution/4/

And these tools don’t even address any of the 22 examples of Beck’s blatant hypocrisies over the last year:

http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2011/04/glenn-beck-deceives-to-demonstrate-22nd.html

Now this ugly cretin will tell the world what beautiful person Beck is or some such insanity.

Boo Hoo Hoo! Nobody listened to your dopey little show last night.

Blah! Ha! Ha!

Crazy bizarre…but, as always, informative