Tells the truth like a boss.

Amen, Dr. Paul!

“No, I don’t think any one would be a lot better. That’s my problem and
that’s the problem with the country. When you put people in office —
yuo put a Democrat in, he acts like a republican too much, and when you
put a Republican in, they act like a Democrat and they spend too much
money. So I just don’t see a whole lot of difference with them.”

No sht Sherlock!

Tell that to the gNOpigs! They are scared shtless of the Marxist-Gitmo approving Kenyan 3% approving Bin-Laden voting-against-Iran invasion, democratically elected occupier of the W.H.

I tell you! Ron Paul IS NOT crazy!

Ron Paul is right. I don’t see any advantage of voting for Romney over Obama at all. Santorum is a social conservative but that’s not my thing. If being a social conservative is a top priority, Santorum is your guy. Newt’s only advantage is a Moon base.

Sanity–I mean heresy!!!

Paul just keeps taking delegates away from Romney.   It will be an interesting convention that’s for sure.  

Wolf, a known non-news 6-letter agency agent disguised as a journalist, looks like a guy about to waterboard you if you don’t tell him what he wants to hear

Hate to admit it but you sort of described Wolf very well right there.

Ron Paul is the only person in the race that will make a difference, Fear Santorum he will have us fighting a war on three fronts, he has already stated that he would send troops back into Iraq, Romney will be Obama lite, and who could even venture a guess what Newt would try and do, but the one thing seems clear is that he would not have the backing of congress no matter which party would be in power.

Ron Paul is the only candidate that offers change and constitutional governance.  A sound dollar and believes in a truly free market economy, not the rigged game that Washington has played for the last 100 years….

I don’t think Ron Paul could get the Republican nomination. I would vote for him if he runs 3rd party though.

I’m voting for him no matter what. Write-in if neccesary.

If he doesn’t run I might support the highest polling 3rd party. Maybe Roseanne?

Obama = Unconstitutional warfare and welfare.

Romney = Unconstitutional warfare and welfare.

Gingrich = Unconstitutional warfare and welfare.

Santorum = Unconstitutional warfare and welfare.

Ron Paul = BOSS.

Get the best selling book for free on your Kindle Sunday, February 12th! It will challenge everything you may have heard about Heaven & Hell and force you to ask, “Is God really love?”
http://www.whatthehellbook.com/2012/02/11/get-what-the-hell-for-free-on-the-kindle-sunday-february-12th/

He’s right.
But the little racist prick sucks ass even more than those clowns. He forgot to point his middle finger at himself.

Why are Ron Paul supporters such cowards?

They fear War more than any of the anti-war protesters. And if your in the military and support Ron Paul.
A. I don’t give a shit, that does not impress me.
B. Don’t complain about fighting in war when you volunteered for the military. (wa wa wa I have to do my job)

Finally please go back to the Democrat party and push your drug addict agenda. All the while denouncing  Reagan some more.

This message was brought to you by the Ron Paul Free Republican Party. 

I actually think that the dirty little secret that most in the GOP establishment know, but will never admit out loud, is that another 4 years of Obama really wouldn’t be that bad for the GOP.  As far as democratic presidents go, Obama is definitely to the right of Clinton, anyway, as has shown himself to be willing to balk and compromise on all his main issues whenever the GOP puts up a fight.

So I’m actually beginning to think that many of the “smart” ones in the GOP are perfectly willing to sacrifice the presidency in order to hold onto and gain seats in the house and senate.  This will put them into a better position in the long run–allowing them to at least dampen any effect Obama could have in the next 4 years, all while putting them in a position to run a GOP presidential candidate (i.e. Christie) that more people would be excited about in 2016.

Of course, I don’t think the GOP base is that rational.  So they will all cling to the absurd narrative that Obama is some unprecedented radical.  But I think many in the GOP establishment are smart enough to see Obama for what he really is: decidedly moderate on all the issues that really matter to those who hold the most power in the GOP.

And at this point, I even think another 4 years would also be better for the GOP base.  If Romney wins in November, the party as a whole will be moved to the middle.  Whereas, if Obama wins, this gives the base the best thing they could ask for: the “villain” they need (however much a fiction their representation of this villain may be) to attempt to scare people in the party into moving into a more conservative direction in 2014 and 2016 elections.

Ron Paul= Anti Reagan coward who is afraid of Banks and War.

What an idiotic comment.  

It’s also rather ironic coming from someone like you.

Paul does not fear banks, he wants them to make it on their OWN.

Paul does not fear war, he wants constitutionally declared and defined wars.

I can’t stand you xenophobic war mongers.  

There’s little difference between you and the terrorists you see under your bed.

The only difference is you use our military, they use themselves.

The United States holds the power necessary to alter our relationship with Iran.

They do not.

The problem with this country is they are not able to discern the fact that Dr. Paul makes a lot of sense at times.  It’s not an either or proposition you fools.  For example, Paul has made the clear point that human life would be better if we shared this planet and left each other alone.  Yet, that idea is considered “dangerous.”  We live in a world turned on its head.  We need to stand up.  Of course that will never happen.  Not as long as the most sane politician in the race is often the one called crazy.

He adds $5 trillion to deficit and you say he is to the right of Clinton? No wonder this country is in trouble, it’s voters like you.

One question for you, Without a national bank, how would you finance your constitutional war? And please provide examples of the USA conducting “constitutionally approved wars” without a national bank.  

Please allow me to apologize to all the Ron Paul supporters. I now realize that Ron Paul must be right because he fought in the Cold War.

What a F-ing joke who goes on national TV and brags about fighting in a war, that wasn’t actually a war. Ron Paul that’s who!!!!!

Any man who has been in War has been afraid.  I’ve never been in a War, but if you don’t think having your friends killed in front of you as bullets are piercing the air is scary, then maybe you need to reassess your notion of war.  War is fear.  It is the embodiment of everything twisted and mangled in this world.  War is not a game to be played for the sake of glory.  It is people like you that pervert the political process.  So stupid to denigrate a man who embodies the spirit of America.  One of the only men willing to stand for freedom and liberty.  All he asks is for a little restraint and common sense.  A plea to follow the rules when we make these decisions.  Yet, he is called crazy and dangerous.  Is it not crazy and dangerous to go around bombing other countries, then refusing to admit this bombing has an adverse reaction, otherwise known as “blowback.”  It’s so simple children understand it.  We live in a turned upside down world.  The people calling for peace are the ones seen as dangerous.

Is this a new conservative meme?  ”Another four years of Obama will help us for 2016…”?

Translate:  We know the GOP has no shot in 2012, so this is how we will spin it.

How much did the GOP (who had been in power from 2000-2008) add to the deficit?  (In the first 4 years of Obama’s term, the deficit has increased at a lower rate than the last 4 years of Bush’s term).

But rhetoric is one thing.  Blaming Bush, I think, is ultimately kind of pointless as Obama’s record stands for itself.  Compare Obama’s policies with Romney’s–i.e. the practical things they claim that they will do and the things which they could conceivably do–and they aren’t much different.

I mean, conservatives claim that Obama is some radical Marxist, but taxes in most cases were actually higher under Clinton than they currently are under Obama.  The most Obama could conceivably achieve, in the best case scenario for the DFL in his next term, is to raise taxes on the highest wage earners back to what they were under Clinton–and perhaps close some loopholes which allow certain types of income to remain tax free or taxed at a lower rate.  I don’t think he’ll touch taxes on the middle and lower classes (nor should he).  

Restoring the tax code to what it was in the 1990s hardly seems like a “radical Marxist agenda” to me. 

Again, if you look at what he has actually accomplished in the past 4 years, Obama is undeniably to the right of any DFL president of the past half century.  His one big accomplishment is the health care bill, but while I personally think it accomplished some good things, the version of the bill which was ultimately passed was so neutered from his original vision that it’s completely absurd when the GOP tries to claim that it was some socialist scheme (Is your memory so short?  If you recall, one of the biggest criticisms against Obama among the DFL back in the 2008 primaries was that his health care plan was actually to the right of Hilary Clinton’s.  He got a lot of flack for that from liberals at the time–and the version of the bill that actually ended up passing was even to the right of that).

This idea of Obama as some unprecedented radical is an entirely absurd fiction.  But that’s just how politics work these days.  If Hilary had won in 2008, the right would be saying the same thing about her right now.  There is just a tendency in American politics to demonize the opposition to the point of hyperbole.  The left did it with Bush, and the right are doing it now with Obama.

I’m not a conservative trying to spin anything.  It’s just true.

All you need to do is look at the contenders in the current GOP primary.  Do you actually think any of them are capable of leading the GOP into a  new age of conservatism, much less selling conservative ideas to the public at large?

The GOP desperately needs its own 2008 Obama right now.  Some fresh blood which can get not only the base, but the public at large excited about voting republican, but the only people currently running are a bunch of has beens from by gone eras of past republican glory.

After the financial crisis, the economy went into a deep recession.  People who lost their jobs collected unemployment benefits at the same time that government revenues fell, since those people were not paying taxes.  And the bail-out for the banks were initiated under the previous administration.  So the generalization that President Obama added $5 trillion to the deficit is not quite accurate.

Also, I have trouble blaming individual voters for the problems of the country.  We get as much information as we can and try to make good decisions.  Shouldn’t our leaders be held responsible for their actions?  If there is a problem, it is in the system of campaign finance and lobbying that allows policians to be purchased by those who can afford it.

To your point, I think you are correct that the current crop of GOP contenders is lackluster at best.  I just wonder as we get closer to November, if the Conservatives will be spinning this upcoming defeat as a positive. 

>For example, Paul has made the clear point that human life would be better if we shared this planet and left each other alone. Yet, that idea is considered “dangerous.”<

Not dangerous so much as silly. 

There is a time for peace, war, and every purpose under Heaven. Its not black and white. Obviously war sucks but so do tyrrants who oppress their people.

boring? lonely? I know a wonderful place —casualmingle dot ‘c *o*m— for seeking causal encounters and short term relationship. life is short, have fun. 90i08u09uji8h0

Hes to the right of Reagan

No, of course they won’t.  That would be entirely self-defeating.  They have to at least maintain the facade, after all (just as democrats did in 2004–even though I think most of them knew as well that John Kerry totally sucked as a candidate).

But regardless of how they spin it, I think a defeat in  2012 will undoubtedly be nothing but positive for them. The American public has a short attention span. The GOP will be in a position to reinvent themselves in 2016, just as the democrats did in 2008.

You mean like the U.S. Civil war? Go figure we had a lot less wars before a federal reserve and our allegiance to the U.N.

Raving lunatic.  This proves Rush was right when he said that the politicians in Washington don’t get how bad it really is in this country under Obama, and anybody on the republican ticket would be better than him, even the idiot Ron Paul. 

I’d like to see some of this on the campaign: http://youtu.be/VQ6dvKCfDRo

Is that you Mitt??
_________________________
A Purebred Mormon ChickenHawk

A blue ribbon ChickenHawk named Mitt
Used every type deferment he could get
To stay out of Viet Nam
And avoid serving Uncle Sam
For he promoted the war, while he avoided it.

Mitt’s daddy, George, was an exotic ChickenHawk
Born in Mexico of good Mormon polygamous stock
But when the Mexican war began
These Mormons cut and ran,
Flying north to join their Salt Lake City flock.

Mitt counter-protested those who stood against the war
‘Cause daddy taught him to avoid serving in The Corps
Then a Mormon mission to France
Insured there was no chance
That little Mitt would have to face the bloody gore.

When Mitt later became a world class neocon
He made sure  that his five sons would carry on
The Romney ChickenHawk bloodline
With that yellow Mormon spine
By running away from the followers of the Qur’an.

So the next time you hear his loud war squawks
When Mitt stands to give his Presidential talks
Remember there’s nary a draftee
In Mitt’s Mormon pedigree
‘Cause he’s from a line of purebred ChickenHawks!
_________________________
Charles Ulysses Feney

Is that you, Newt?
_________________________
Chickenhawk Newt With A Cowardly Soul

A draft-dodging ChickenHawk named Newt
Went to great lengths not to be a recruit
When his last deferment was filed
With his teacher, he sired a child
And gave the military a middle-fingered salute.

As soon as the Viet Nam war was done
Newt’s political career had begun
The way he carried on
You’d think he was Gengis Khan
‘Cause he voted for any war they could fund.

That’s how it is with political trolls
In a fight, they’re hiding in holes
Newt, Cheney, and Limbaugh
Can’t get enough shock n awe
But they $h!+ themselves with cowardly souls!
_____________________
Charles Ulysses Feney

Interestingly enough, you don’t know anything about your hero, Reagan. Firstly, all chief economists in the Keynesian expertise think that Reagan should have raised taxes and cut social benefits. The economy was booming too much and people weren’t paying off their debt. This way, the economy would shrink a bit and people wouldn’t overspend. The economy boomed under Reagan because of credit card debt – not good policy. The average American was spending more than they earned. 

This same president, Reagan, funded terror groups in the Middle East and Africa. Al Qaeda was one of these groups. He freed our hostages but they were going to be released early. He told the Iran hostage takers to wait until he was elected President. 

These are just facts. And by the way, it is healthy to be anti-war. Ron Paul actually fought in war. Romney and Gingrich both dodged the draft because of Mormonism and Marrying a High School Teacher respectively. 

Oh and Reagan endorsed Ron Paul. “Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country.”
-Ronald Reagan

So funny that THIS day old article only has 38 responses, and coming from Ron Paul too….

‘I Don’t Think Any One Would Be A Lot Better’ Than Obama On Important Issues. 
Especially you….

Why not? He’s the only one that could disagree with Obama with any credibility.

How is he a raving lunatic? He was pressed for an answer and he gave us his honest opinion. You’re the one raving about this.

He did a lot more for the military at a time of war than Romney, Santorum, & Gingrich combined.

Probably because Ron Paul supporters are the ones actually fighting the wars. You would be more afraid of war if there were a chance that you were going to die from it.

It seems to be easier for those republicans who have no children in the war zone to stand on a stage of a debate and quickly say they would go to war with IRAN right away – no questions, no discussions, and no eagerness to resolve the nuke problem in a civilized manner. 
Look what the “rush to war” republican did for us in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Thankfully, President Obama listens to the military leaders but gives a lot of thought to the consequences of war and isn’t afraid to hit the enemy when needed or kill Bin Laden when the opportunity arises.

And Ru Paul, repealer of DADT IS? Pulhease
They ALL SUCK, inc HIM.

It’s just like the people who say they need to get rid of Fannie and Freddie.  Ron Paul wants to get rid of the Federal Reserve.
I ask people – how do you expect to finance a house if you do that?  I think anyone who really knows how the banking system works and how it would impact them personally would realize that ‘you can’t shoot yourself in the foot’ by geting rid of the Federal Reserve, Fannie and freddie.

Don’t look for the “10% congress” to go republican by any means.  There is going to be a huge backlash to the republicans this next November. 

Well, the senile one speaks from the grave of the forgotten candidates.  They aren’t done yet.  His handlers, a mix of anti-Republican, liberal-Democrat, libertarians, will bathe him, throw his false teeth in, and put him in one of his his ill fitting suits, in a clean pair of Depends Undergarments, and send him back out to do battle to bring the Republican Party down.  The man is a myth, his followers no better than a gang of Grateful Dead followers…squawking about their lack of access to drugs at a cheap price.

Well, well, well, Ron Paul, the senile one speaks from the grave of the forgotten candidates. 
They aren’t done yet.  His handlers, a mix of anti-Republican,
liberal-Democrat, libertarians, will bathe him, throw his false teeth
in, and put him in one of his his ill fitting suits, in a clean pair of
Depends Undergarments, and send him back out to do battle to bring the
Republican Party down.  The man is a myth, his followers no better than a
gang of Grateful Dead followers…squawking about their lack of access
to drugs at a cheap price.

Bullshit the Union used the civil war as a reason to solidify  the currency and guess how they did that!! The US Treasury decided who’s money was good who’s wasn’t. Look this country has destroyed the national bank time and time again. But it has always came back. So how do explain that? Also where would you prefer everyone’s tax dollars be stored? You would probably say Liemon brothers or with Bernie Maddoff. No one on the right is saying don’t audit, but to just get rid of it is stupid it has been done over and over, yet it always come back because it is the most logical way to fund a government.

You mean all Three of you??? Look if Paul’s lunatic anti-Semitic ideas are so good why hasn’t he won any primaries. He wont even win his home state.

Ron Paul served in the USAF as a medical doctor during the Viet Nam war. He served as an officer in the AF from 1962-1965 and 65-68 in the ANG. As a serviceman you have no control as to where you serve, the military sends you where you are needed most. All servicemen are considered veterans if they served from 1961 to the end of the VietNam war. Ron Paul never bragged about being in battle, doctors are not put on the front lines, they are needed to attend our wounded troops and their families. Technically Paul did not serve in a war, war was never declaired, but tell that to the 58,000 dead servicemen and thousands of wounded verterans and their families. If you served in the military you wouldn’t be so ignorant.

You are a coward if you don’t want to fight a war? I doubt many will not fight to protect their family and their country if it were in danger. We have no outside threat to the united states that could defeat us. Anyone who advocates war as a real solution is a tyrant , insane or both.
It is not the job of the military to just fight wars. If that is the case then why aren’t the rest of the worlds militaries fighting as well?

This message brought to you by common sense America.

LOL you have nothing but name calling and slander with no logic to back your claims.

He is right. Democrat and Neocon, are the Establishment. They are tag team wrestlers and their goal is White GeNOcide.

Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, White countries for everyone.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
 

No, I mean the troops. The people fighting for this country so you & I don’t have to. Also, he’s can’t win primaries because his party has adopted the lunatic policy of invading Iran. He doesn’t have to win any primaries though. His goal is to accumulate as many delegates as he can so he could force the Republicans to give him a platform at their convention or to bolster his status as a 3rd party candidate.

 Long after Ron Paul is gone people will continue to squawk about their lack of liberty.

 you finance a house with money you have, not someone else’s money

you call names but you dont provide substance

Oh.. I don’t know maybe by allowing the Treasury to sell bonds…

You mean the money YOU get from MOMMY & DADDY?

Thank you for your sanity Juan. 
My only caveat would be to point out that demonizing the Bush regime was not hyperbole. 
They really were horrible.
I think Obama has done a creditable, yes, even noble job of saving the country from ruin. 
Attacking Obama is easy if you don’t pay attention to the facts.
Just a Canadian giving his two cents (trading at par these days for what its worth).  

It’s not about fearing wars.  It’s about Eisenhower’s Military Industrial Complex.  When a War is necessary, no problem.  When it’s all about making money on the backs of dead soldiers, then it’s BS!

Ron Paul always speaks the profound blunt logical truth of any matter, but people are conditioned to accept only certain beliefs comfortable with popular views of the day.  I don’t believe in everything that Ron Paul believes, but he’d get my vote because he’s the only politician who has demonstrated honesty and doesn’t talk out of both sides of his face. Ron Paul has always based his voting on Bills whether or not it is in accordance with the Constitution. Can’t say that about any other politician.   

Either one of my two pet minature pigs, Mohammud and Allah, could do a better job than the Community Agitater, Obambi, the balless wonder!

Yes,  what a radical Marxist, taking the same position on Marijuana as Clarence Thomas in his Gonzalez vs. Raich dissent. 

Whoops, accidentally posted this in the wrong place. The above point will be lost on anyone who looks beyond ad hominems and actually uses reason.

Whoops, posted that in the wrong place, it was intended for someone who wants to consider reason rather than ad hominem.

Here’s the response meant for you:

I dare you to look up “Gonzalez vs. Raich”.

I know you won’t do it, because you are an Intellectual coward and a mental midget.

Ron Paul is the only one who speaks differently than the three. The rest of the world is paying attention to him. Hope he makes it out of the rigged election so far!

Either one of your two pet miniture pigs have infinitely more intelligence than you.

Yeah valkyrie, and we ally ourselves with, fund and arm half of them… we overthrow the other half, namely those that don’t serve our interests, or who cease doing so, and replace them with tyrants that do. Need a list? I could fire off 20, 30 names off the top of my head. But the only global tyrant is us. A totalitarian is someone who thinks he can fix the whole world, immediately and by force no less, in his nation or someone else’s*… war rarely achieves what people claim it does. The victor’s propaganda just seeks to justify why the people sacrificed so much for so little, and to convince themselves they are just and good and their murders were noble, when they almost never are.

This is retarded, I can’t reply to you even though you replied to me. The Civil War was about southern states not wanting to be a part of the northern states because of a difference of opinions. It had nothing to do with money being thrown away. Gold always has a value and that is the issue here, not your petty idea of where money should be stored, but the value the dollar actually has. You’re pathetic for supporting this kind of robbery. By the way 3 likes to 0 likes. In a majority based country, like ours is suppose to be, that would mean I won. Deal with it B^|

yes. i didnt have to hold a gun to their head to get that money