1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Bipartisanship! TV Pundits On Both Sides Unhappy With Health Care Summit

video
» 7 comments

The health care summit that framed so much of our weekly news cycle has come and gone, but if the coverage of the event by the major media outlets is any indication, it managed to remind us of the durability of bipartisanship in the media, with pundits on the left and right both sounding off against it: CNN is confused as to the direction Congress will now take, MSNBC’s pundits unhappy with the call for compromise, and news anchor Shepard Smith is tired of Congress wasting his time on talk that leads nowhere.

At CNN, Dana Bash writes a piece for the Political Ticker asking “What’s Next?” The piece reads as if Bash has her arms outstretched in a confused half-shrug, waiting for directions, despite being a series of factual questions. Will Democrats be able to come up with a bill that would drum up Republican support? If they need to use reconciliation, will the bill they draft be eligible for the process (which is only legally able to affect bills involving taxes or the deficit)?

While the journalists at CNN left the event with more questions than answers, the pundits felt their cynicism swell at the idea of such dissonant parties working together. Over at MSNBC, Salon’s Glenn Greenwald sounded off on Morning Joe Today, dissatisfied with the calls for bipartisanship that lead to the summit. “Having the two parties compromise and dilute their positions and pick positions arbitrarily in the middle,” he notes, “for the sake of doing so just to eliminate discord and disharmony and disagreement that’s what strikes me, not only as anti-democratic, but counterproductive,” calling those who demand bipartisanship for its own sake undemocratic. The commentary on Fox News was equally incendiary, with Shepard Smith barely containing his disdain for the entire process almost before the summit was over, calling it “poppycock” and pointing out that the likelihood of any substantive change coming out of the event was low. Outraged, he told South Dakota senator John Thune, “you people up there who are supposed to be representing us are making it perfectly clear you’re gonna sit in your corners with your own talking points and we’re gonna lose. We’re gonna get nothing.” Talking Points Memo compiled the best moments of Smith’s coverage, shown below:


Whether the event was a victory for the President remains to be seen, as there is still time to determine what bill Congress will pass, if any. Ultimately, as much as the health summit was labeled a publicity stunt, the media’s reaction to it shows it did more to make each side more loyal to their cause than to promote public compromise, but the press wasn’t the audience President Obama was trying to court yesterday. If anything, the President got everyone to agree on one thing: the health care summit did little to change anyone’s mind on health care.

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • roxsteady

    I’m still trying to find one idea that the Republicans put forth yesterday that wasn’t already in the current bill? Anybody? All I heard from them was “Start Over”. See, when you’ve lost an election historically as the Republicans did, why do they think they should be calling the shots? I’m glad the President waited until the end to inform those idiots on the other side that “We’re not starting over” Suck on that you pastie faced, miserable old bastards! Oh, and kudos to Jim Bunning who blocked unemployment extensions today. I assume that no one in Kentucky is on unemployment? Don’t old people tend to fall down in bad weather? I’m still praying for ya Jim!

  • ImNotBlue

    roxsteady says:
    February 26, 2010 at 1:35 pm
    I’m still trying to find one idea that the Republicans put forth yesterday…

    Perhaps if you had stopped praying for the death of your political opponents for a few minutes, you would have heard some.

  • The Real Royal King

    The Republicans didn’t put forth a single new idea, Roxsteady. Same old muk they’ve been shoveling for years, all to make sure the health insurance companies keep rolling in dough.

  • marcus.lewis

    Undercover patients

    I tried to get past 1, but all their other proposals we did hear before. Some of them had merit, but not as stand alone piece of legislation as there would be ways around that.

  • ImNotBlue
  • http://www.sailrabbits.com Magister

    I sat through all six hours and twenty-two minutes of the health care summit and while it was running, I participated in a couple of liveblogs as an amusement. I did not watch via one of the commercial networks, the blogosphere made it appear that they were interrupting for analysis and commercials, so I stuck with the uninterrupted coverage.

    If non-partisan person could be defined and identified, who watched the thing in its entirety could be found, I’d be somewhat interested in their analysis, but one of the “problems” with our current media climate is that while an event is running, the pundits are often doing other things to get ready for their liveshots and they just end-up parroting what they’ve heard.

    IMHO: I heard a surprising amount of agreement, once you learned to ignore the talking points. If the media would catalog and list those particular areas instead focusing so much on the horse race, I think they’d actually be doing us a service, but that’s a little harder than deciding what to think based on a few tweets.

  • timzank

    The Real Royal King says:
    February 26, 2010 at 1:49 pm
    The Republicans didn’t put forth a single new idea, Roxsteady. Same old muk they’ve been shoveling for years, all to make sure the health insurance companies keep rolling in dough.

    You realize of course those evil health insurance companies have a net profit of about 3%, right? Premuims aren’t high because of profit, they are high because of operating costs (read:regulations) .

    Another glaring example of why you flakes shouldn’t be in charge of anything, you can’t add 2+2.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram