1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Huh? WikiLeaks Threatens Its Own Leakers With $20 Million Penalty If They Leak Elsewhere

» 7 comments

WikiLeaks has gained a number of fans (and enemies, of course) with its attempts to foster transparency in a world of secretive and duplicitous governments. However, it appears they do, after all, still consider themselves a business and, as such, aren’t all too keen on having their own material leaked. The New Statesman has obtained a confidentiality agreement that the organization has its staff sign which threatens them with a penalty of about $20 million if they leak the “valuable proprietary commercial information” that WikiLeaks would rather sell to the media.

The New Statesman calls the agreement “draconian” and summarizes it thusly:

“Clause 5 of this ‘Confidentiality Agreement’ (PDF) imposes a penalty of ‘£12,000,000 – twelve million pounds sterling’ on anyone who breaches this legal gag.

This ludicrous – and undoubtedly unenforceable – amount is even based on “a typical open market valuation” for the leaked information that WikiLeaks possesses.

This phraseology is consistent with WikliLeaks’s perception of itself as a commercial organisation in the business of owning and selling leaked information. Indeed, there is no other sensible way of interpreting this penalty clause.”

So, is this hypocritical for a group that sees no problem in releasing others’ private information to keep their own under such a sturdy lock and key? Or is this just a necessary practice for a business that is providing a service?

Either way, I’m a bit curious as to how the New Statesman received the document. After all, a WikiLeaks associate releasing information of the stipulation is, unsurprisingly, a breach of the stipulation itself.

I suppose we have to ask, Who leaks the leakers?

(h/t Wired via Business Insider)

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • tatboy

    Of course…

  • Azarkhan

    Very amusing and ironic.

  • Dem4Ever

    Well, Jon? The lack of posts says it all about wikileaks lack of relevance…doesn’t it?

  • Zandandido

    Ruh oh, sounds like we have a HYPOCRITE!

  • poorsinner101

    Real hard to figure out hypocrisy… heh?

    10 bucks that the Fox story “Why Don’t We Hear About Soros’ Ties to Over 30 Major News Organizations?” never sees the light of day on Mediaite….

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/05/11/dont-hear-george-soros-ties-30-major-news-organizations/#ixzz1M8trgdMt

    This information is part of an upcoming report by the Media Research Centers Business & Media Institute which has been looking into George Soros and his influence on the media.

  • Thelonious Funk

    Unless they have shareholders, WikiLeaks can be as opaque as they wish. The government has about 300 million shareholders they should be transparent with.

  • MrTPar_taY

    Leakers, hell I’d piss on every one of these assholes.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram