Thousands of companies advertise on TV and radio, yet Congressman Weiner launches a crusade against this one. O’Reilly is right. This is just a witch hunt — part of an ongoing (and failed) attempt to persecute people who advertise on Beck’s show.

This is a witch hunt.

Where is the link to Weiner’s page?

Beck, chickenshit that he is, wont be on with Weiner.
The last time he debated someone on the left (the Acorn guy) he got his ass kicked so badly he cut his mike off and then bragged how he personally threw him outta the studio. lmfao

Weiner is the definition of a hypocritical prick. He wouldn’t be going after this gold company if they hadn’t run advertising on Becks show.

Falafel O’Reilly just got PWNED!

BUY MORE GOLD, BEDWETTERS!

Once again, an A+ rating and/or accreditation from the Better Business Bureau only means they resolve complaints, have a clear contract, have been in business for at least a year and they are properly licensed. It is not an endorsement of the actual business, rather it reflects upon the way they conduct it and whether they do it within the terms of their contract.

I said the other day that Beck’s use of the BBB rating isn’t a direct violation of the group’s standards because he’s not a member and subject to their rules, but this O’Reilly segment seems to b teetering over the line and though they may be reluctant, perhaps it’s time for the Bureau to make some kind of clarifying statement to protect their good name.

So Anthony Weiner was all over the media during the HealthCare debate advocating for a bill, which forces Americans, to have to buy healthcare or be penalized in fines.

Now he goes after Goldline a consumer choice?

Every hear of car insurance? Weiner just neutered Bill O the Clown! Did he actually say at one point that he didn’t care? I wonder if the gold buying idiots who watch Beck care? P.T. Barnum was right and they all watch Beck!

I know, I know, typo! Call The Better Business Bureau! And keep apologizing for these crooks. It looks so good on you!

Nobody got pawned. Just good TV.

I knew it would be a mistake to read these comments. Sensible discussions never occur on Mediaite because readers are baited by some of the most ridiculous bloggers on the internet.

Oh, and ask Bill O to pass this on to former govenor dumb ass!

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/24/palin-oil-cash/

Knowledge is power!

Roxsteady says ” Ever hear of car insurance ?”

Yea you don’t HAVE to own a car , you window licker, now put your hemet back on.

Let’s see how many complaints the BBB has received over the last 3 moths. No, make that, over the last 12 months. No lets go back 24 months- damn, lets look at the massive number of complaints over the last 3 years!!!!!

Complaint Closing Statistics

The following grid displays the number and responses to complaints over the last 36 months:
No. of Cmpl Type of Response
9 Making a full refund, as the consumer requested
3 Making a partial refund
25 Agreeing to perform according to their contract
0 Refusing to make an adjustment
6 Refuse to adjust, relying on terms of agreement
0 Unanswered
0 Unassigned
43 Total

Just in case the adults come back to the room, and the kids above go to bed, does anyone find it plausible that Weiner would, out of the blue, and with numerous legitimate “consumer” issues out there where people are really getting scammed, would decide it was his civic duty to single out and protect a bunch of relatively well heeled conservative tea partiers that not long ago he was calling racist violent loons?

Wow, quite a turn of the heart Mr. Weiner.

This doesn’t even pass the laugh test.

Fox gives Beck critics air time during their most popular prime time show. And that is something that you will never see at MSNBC, CNN, CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, etc. etc.

And that is also why Fox is growing its audience, while the Thought Police at the other networks are losing theirs. People want to see frank and open debate between differing views, and not the filtered, censored, politically correct pablum that the Left wants them to consume. So they have no choice except to tune into Fox.

roxsteady says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:02 pm
“Every hear of car insurance?”
_____________________________
Driving is a privilege.

Breathing is a necessity.

Read the report. Decide if this looks like price gouging to you.

http://weiner.house.gov/Reports/GoldlineReport.pdf

JustTheFacts

The biggest loser and the real victim in this latest example of “freeze a target and polarize it” politics will be the Better Business Bureau, a non partisan American institution.

Weiner, a US congressman, flat out accused them of taking bribes on national TV.

Some people don’t care who they stomp on, EVEN if its a stanch ally. Just ask the New York Times.

JustTheFacts says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:41 pm

Read the report. Decide if this looks like price gouging to you.

http://weiner.house.gov/Reports/GoldlineReport.pdf

JustTheFacts
_________________________________________________
How am I to trust Weiner’s report?

Apparently, I can no longer trust the Better Business Bureau.

Why am I to trust a politician who only looks at “some” gold selling businesses and not trust a non partisan watchdog organization who looks at all gold selling business?

Next week, dogs and cats will be living together.

JustTheFacts says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:41 pm

Read the report. Decide if this looks like price gouging to you.

http://weiner.house.gov/Reports/GoldlineReport.pdf

Yes, just the facts- I don’t think I want to believe in something that says “As seen on TV.”

JustTheFacts

As Seen on TV:

felixw says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:30 pm
Fox gives Beck critics air time during their most popular prime time show. And that is something that you will never see at MSNBC,…
——————————————-

Well that’s kind of a stupid comment, since most of them have Beck critics on some of the time. Especially MSNBC.

BTW felixw, could you tell me what news CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, programs they have during prime time. You do know what “prime time” is don’t you?

John t

The point was you won’t see, say, a critic of Olbermann, on MSNBC like you’ll see a critic of Beck on Fox. Just ask Donny Deutch (or however you spell his name).

Gold isn’t the only product that can make a ton of money on the Glenn Beck show. You can make millions selling regular household goods at HUGE margins!

http://dontstepinthepoop.com/3-products-fortune-on-glenn-beck

he real john t says:
May 24, 2010 at 11:10 pm

BTW felixw, could you tell me what news CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, programs they have during prime time.”

He didn’t say they did.

He said:

Fox gives Beck critics air time during their most popular prime time show.

And O’Reilly is a commentary show.

the real john t says:
May 24, 2010 at 11:10 pm
“BTW felixw, could you tell me what news CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, programs they have during prime time. You do know what “prime time” is don’t you?”
______________________________________________________
How is that question relevant to Fox News’ most popular prime time show? Do you somehow seek the use your statement that the Factor is not Fox News’ most popular prime time show? Is the factor not on in Fox News’ in prime time?

JustTheFacts says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:41 pm
Read the report. Decide if this looks like price gouging to you.

You morons realize of course, you can take the “report” and keep it completely intact, except change the words “gold” and “gold coins” with “shoes” “diamonds” “artwork” or even “furniture” and add a zero to the markup, right?

JohnSimpson says:
May 24, 2010 at 11:16 pm
he real john t says:
May 24, 2010 at 11:10 pm

BTW felixw, could you tell me what news CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, programs they have during prime time.”

He didn’t say they did.
——————————————-

You have a reading comprehension problem don’t you?

This is the real bottom line:

The whole point of all of “this” is to scare off all of Beck’s advertisers.

And whether you’re red, blue or purple, you know that statement’s true.

“You have a reading comprehension problem don’t you?”

POT. KETTLE. BLACK.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 24, 2010 at 11:24 pm
——————

Yeah, you’re one to talk.

the real john t says:
May 24, 2010 at 11:26 pm

“Yeah, you’re one to talk.”
____________________________

Can you put that in context or should I expect you to call me some sort of name next?

Hmmmm…following these comments brings to mind “Don’t you make me stop this car” for some reason.

Rogue, I will try and explain this to you that maybe even a 4th grader would understand. Here is felix’s comment:

“Fox gives Beck critics air time during their most popular prime time show. And that is something that you will never see at MSNBC, CNN, CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, etc. etc”
——————————-

Now he says “prime time” and wants to know what other network would do that. If you can’t understand that then there’s no help for you.

John,

Go reread all the comments, and then tell me why *I* have the comprehension of a “fourth grader.”

*This is the most pointless argument I have ever been in.*

O’Reilly having a critic of Beck on his show would be the equivalent of Rachel having a critic of Olbermann on her show. And the original point was, you’ll never see that equivalent on MSNBC. It’s not that complicated, real john.

writer says:
May 24, 2010 at 11:52 pm
“O’Reilly having a critic of Beck on his show would be the equivalent of Rachel having a critic of Olbermann on her show. And the original point was, you’ll never see that equivalent on MSNBC. It’s not that complicated, real john.”
________________________________________

Two points for writer.

writer says:
May 24, 2010 at 11:52 pm
O’Reilly having a critic of Beck on his show would be the equivalent of Rachel having a critic of Olbermann on her show. And the original point was, you’ll never see that equivalent on MSNBC.
—————————————

I guess you didn’t notice the other networks he mentioned.

I noticed, but you did not articulate your point and you also did not address the point I, and WRITER, made about MSNBC.

It’s doubtful the other networks would give air time to someone to specifically attack one of their own. With MSNBC, it’s a lead pipe cinch you’ll never see them allow someone airtime to criticize Olbermann.

MSNBC won’t even allow one of their own to criticize Olbermann. Look what happened to Shuster. And Chris Matthews walks on egg shells, afraid he might say something their golden boy won’t like.

Rogue-Comic, go back and read the comments I made to felix. Before you look even more ignorant.

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:07 am
“It’s doubtful the other networks would give air time to someone to specifically attack one of their own. With MSNBC, it’s a lead pipe cinch you’ll never see them allow someone airtime to criticize Olbermann.”

John’s point (I think) was ABC etc. broadcast situation comedies etc. during there prime time hours, but Felix’s point had merit when it came to MSNBC and CNN.

real john, felix was saying that MSNBC won’t allow anyone on to criticize their personalities the way Fox will. Then your argument was that MSNBC has critics of Beck on all the time. Duh.

the real john t says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:10 am
“Rogue-Comic, go back and read the comments I made to felix. Before you look even more ignorant.”
___________________________________

Name calling does not win you an argument, and you only addressed the broadcast networks in an effort to make Felix look bad while omitting MSNBC and CNN that would have made his point viable.

Again, this is like arguing if the sky is blue or aqua-blue.

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:15 am
———————

Why don’t you read Rogue’s comment right above yours. At least I think he kind of gets it.

real john, let’s make it simple. When Rachel Maddow has a guest on who criticizes Olbermann, the same way O’Reilly allowed a guest to criticize Beck, let us know.

roxsteady says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:08 pm
Oh, and ask Bill O to pass this on to former govenor dumb ass!

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/24/palin-oil-cash/

Knowledge is power!

Yes Rox, we know you get all your talking points from Media Matters, Think Progress, George Soros, and the Daily Kos. You don’t have ot remind us.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:16 am
the real john t says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:10 am
“Rogue-Comic, go back and read the comments I made to felix. Before you look even more ignorant.”
___________________________________

Name calling does not win you an argument, and you only addressed the broadcast networks in an effort to make Felix look bad while omitting MSNBC and CNN
———————————————

Could you please point to where I did that?

rox lives by that old Quaker proverb: “He who angers me, controls me.”

@writer: While the guest did get in a few lines critical of Beck, my impression from the above clip is that Fox’s biggest, most-watched and one of their most-respected personalities was defending an important advertiser and one of the network’s rising stars.

John,

So far, you implied that I have the intelligence of a 4th grader and that I am ignorant. That is the equivalent of name-calling.

MAGISTER,

That is the real issue here. Weiner is trying to scare off Beck’s sponsors, and he is throwing the Better Business Bureau under the bus in his effort.

I’m not, by any means, a gold investor or a Beck zealot, but this strikes me as nasty politics.

Here Rogue, let me try and make this a little bit easier for you to handle. Where did I do this:

“and you only addressed the broadcast networks in an effort to make Felix look bad while omitting MSNBC and CNN
“

real john may have a point. Calling someone ignorant and questioning their reading skills is not name calling per se. That falls more in the insult category.

I loved Mary Katherine Hams comment that to believe Weiner is sincere, we have to believe he’s all of a suddent worried about the tea-partiers who have invested in Gold. Yeah we all know how much the left cares for the tea-partiers.

John,

See your post at 11:10.

Yeah, Michelle. The fact that Weiner hates Beck had nothing to do with which gold seller he picked to go after. Pure coincidence.

Michelle,

Again, I think its all in reality a shakedown on Beck’s advertisers.

Stuff like this is why I left the Democratic Party.

Innocent parties could be casualties in an effort to silence an opposing viewpoint.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:32 am
John,

See your post at 11:10.
————————–

HUH! Rogue, I pointed them out because they don’t have news programs in prime time. They are not a 24 hr news network. Do you even understand now.

I think you’re seizing too much on felix’s ‘prime time’ comment, and ignoring the gist. The point was that Fox gives air time to its critics, and you won’t see the other news/opinion shows doing that. (Especially on MSNBC, where everyone is terrified of Olbermann.)

@Rogue-Comic: Weiner did get a little specific, but I’ve made several comments to the various threads that it’s Beck & Co. who are throwing the Better Business Bureau “under the bus” because they keep misrepresenting the meaning of the rating and I’m sorry, but I’ve also commented a couple of times that though the BBB may not want to issue a statement because Goldline pays their dues, it’s starting to look like they’ll have no choice.

Beck and O’Reilly keep giving the impression that the Bureau endorses the company and its pricing, while they are only vouching that they real.

Of course, as I’ve also said on other threads, we’re talking about a pricing difference of $154 on Krugerrands. Yes, the company is free to set their own prices and people are free to purchase products from whomever they want, but a Krugerrand is a Krugerrand and I know that I’ll take a special swing by one store to pick up peanut butter or Newman’s Own because they’re a dollar and a half cheaper than the other place, two blocks away.

Beck also noted that Weiner’s newly hired press secretary until recently worked at Media Matters, a liberal media watchdog that has accused Beck of crossing ethical lines in shilling for sponsors including Goldline, and asserted that Weiner was targeting Goldline and Beck at the behest of the White House, which has rebuked Beck for his scathing attacks on Obama.

Hm, correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t Media Matters one of many lib organizations leading a boycott against Beck? Now I’m sure that’s just a coincidence. Hey Rox, when you do your conference call with Media Matters tomorrow, can you find that out for us?

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:45 am
—————————

Why don’t you tell felix that? I just responded to his comment and you and Rogue was the one’s to make a big issue out of it.

the real john t says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:36 am

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:32 am
John,

See your post at 11:10.
————————–

HUH! Rogue, I pointed them out because they don’t have news programs in prime time. They are not a 24 hr news network. Do you even understand now.

______________________________________________________

Yes John, but MSNBC and CNN are and of course run political news content during “prime time.” When you address statements made by other posters, you’ve got to tell the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth. Remember everything is in print here. You omitted where Felix had a point in order to belittle him. His point was valid and by your selective posting, you neutered your counter point.

Not a big issue. It was just obvious that felix meant other networks don’t allow their critics time like Fox does. You seized on the prime time comment as if that disqualified everything else he said.

@MichelleF: As a member of society, I’m somewhat concerned about those who may be getting hoodwinked into paying a higher price for their investments, not only because many of those making an uninformed choice* are in retirement or on the verge, but also because many of them are armed and when that bubble bursts…

To be blunt, John:

You’re spinning and I think everyone can see that.

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:51 am
Not a big issue.
————————-

Then why are you and Rouge making it one? Here is my first response to felix:
————————-

the real john t says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:58 pm
felixw says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:30 pm
Fox gives Beck critics air time during their most popular prime time show. And that is something that you will never see at MSNBC,…
——————————————-

Well that’s kind of a stupid comment, since most of them have Beck critics on some of the time. Especially MSNBC.
——————————————

See it was meant to be kind of tongue in cheek statement. But writer, you and your buddy Rogue took off trying to find everything you could to prove it wrong. So who was making it a big issue?

You were. Glad I could clear that up.

John

You obviously misspoke with your “most of them have Beck critics on some of the time” line and are now back-tracking and spinning to cover a comprehension error on your part.

And you can go back and re-read the comments here and know, w/o question, what I think the “big issue” is here: Intimidating Beck advertisers.

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:16 am
You were. Glad I could clear that up.
————————–

HO! How did you clear that up? If you could have understood my first response to felix we wouldn’t have had this conversation.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:19 am
————–

You’re too stupid to even converse with.

So, real john, you really had no idea what felix was getting at? You had no idea he meant that other news/opinion shows weren’t likely to allow air time to their critics? No idea at all. At that’s why you seized on that ‘prime time’ comment and shook it like a pit bull, all the while pretending you had no idea what felix was getting at. Reminds me of Bill Clinton wanting to know what the definition of ‘is’ is.

First, to all libs, you don’t get to set prices or profit margins for anyone, you just think you can. Nobody cares what you think and the polls are proving it everyday. Pushing your socialism is bringing down the Dems.

Second, Weiner says there are 40 complaints about Goldline so we need to investigate them. Using the Weiner logic, I get 400 complaints a day about Congressman Weiner, I think we should investigate HIM. We already know he has finacial complaints against him and he has the nerve to complain about someone else, LOL.

the real john t says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:21 am
“You’re too stupid to even converse with.”
_________________________________________

I’ll add that to my “4th grade intelligence” and “ignorance” and direct readers to reference my comment at 11:30.

The thing is about this is that it gives the impression that if you decide to advertise on Glenn Beck you will be investigated by Congress or congressmen. It smacks of the very Musillini-esque tactics used in Pre nazi
facism…. scary stuff and sad as well.

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:23 am
—————————-

Go back and read the first comment I responded to from felix and quit showing you ignorance. I told you it was a tongue in cheek comment. But no, you and your buddy Rogue keeps insisting on showing you stupidity.

Anybody sensing a pattern here?

real john, if it was only tongue in cheek, then that must mean you actually understood what felix was getting at. And if you actually got the point, why did you keep beating to death the prime time comment? Your insults are expected, since you on the left can’t debate without them. But to go on and on about ‘prime time’ if you actually knew what was meant…then that is a stumper. Doesn’t make much sense at all.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:32 am
Anybody sensing a pattern here?
————————–

Yeah, I do. You refuse to accept the truth. All you want to do is spin it every way but the truth.

Rogue, you’re right. This is real john’s SOP. Ignore what’s said, seize on a word or two, then go on and on about how the word was used, while getting farther and farther away from the original topic. Think I’ll see what’s on TV.

Okay John,

Explain what the truth of the matter is?

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:37 am
real john, if it was only tongue in cheek, then that must mean you actually understood what felix was getting at. And if you actually got the point, why did you keep beating to death the prime time comment?
——————————-

Maybe you should go back and read the comments. You and Rogue were the ones that attacked me “beating it to death”. But I understand you two just rant and rave about stuff you can’t comprehend.

Thrill me with your acumen.

Gift of gab, Beck is one of the best. Head to head debater? Not a chance.

O’Reilly likes or at the very least respects Weiner. I wonder if he is setting his ‘ol pal up for an epic fail.

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:40 am
“Rogue, you’re right. This is real john’s SOP. Ignore what’s said, seize on a word or two, then go on and on about how the word was used, while getting farther and farther away from the original topic. Think I’ll see what’s on TV.”
_______________________________________________
Indeed. Notice how far we’ve gotten (if you can’t find crap to watch on TV) how far we’ve traveled from any real debate.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:43 am
Thrill me with your acumen.
————————-

“acument”

You know if you really want to sound intelligent you should know the word and how to use it in a sentence.

Dude, I’m quoting “Silence of the Lambs.”

I’ve decided you’re a fake, John.

You once said on this site that you’re a retired Iron Worker; I don’t think that’s true anymore.

OH! Is that where you learned the word “acument” from. I can see you’re highly educated.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:06 am
You once said on this site that you’re a retired Iron Worker; I don’t think that’s true anymore.
——————————–

Why don’t you prove it isn’t true? Since you’re sooooo smart.

“Acumen,” John, not with a “t” at the end like you. You’re avoiding actual debate again, John. Conforming your self to the picture WRITER painted of you at 1:40.

the real john t says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:09 am
“Why don’t you prove it isn’t true? Since you’re sooooo smart.”
___________________________________________

Union NO. and state, John?

For all you people that think Goldline is so great:

http://www.coinlink.com/News/gold-silver-bullion/glenn-beck-got-it-wrong-coin-industry-bbb-ratings-not-full-of-fs/

I know what “acumen” is but what on God’s green earth is an “acument”?

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:14 am

Union NO. and state, John?
—————————-

Local 787 out of WV.

Grammie says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:17 am
—————————–

Grammie, I accidently hit the “t”, now are your going to make a big issue out of it? What’s the matter, did the other 5 people go to bed at Dollar’s Dump?

Magister, what do you think would be the solution to the problem as you perceive it of some markets running up out of proportion to any abstract worth and companies legally charging what the market will bear or selling their over valued stock?

Remember that at this time we really don’t know when gold will reach its peak and/or which Goldline investments will prove to be good and which bad. What did you think of the dotcom and real estate bubbles that burst in the past that left our economies in ruin for a while.. I don’t think Beck had anything to do with those events and I seriously doubt that Goldline single handedly will have any major, or even minor, impact on our presently sick economy.

Eight minutes . . . hmm. Long enough for an effective google search but it checks out. You do sound “young” for the words you type and its a different state than which I am familiar with so I really can’t say if you’re you or your dad without asking you for PI or really devoting time into something I shouldn’t. With all the insults you’ve thrown me, I won’t guilt myself later when I conclude that you sound a lot younger than you claim despite reputable evidence to the contrary. I am going to call my uncle tomorrow and quiz on some things; you sound too young …

the real john t says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:22 am
“Grammie, I accidently hit the “t”, now are your going to make a big issue out of it? What’s the matter, did the other 5 people go to bed at Dollar’s Dump?”
__________________________________________

Accidentally twice in two separate posts?

What does any of the extraneous crap you spewed in your response have to do with the fact that you made the same typo twice with your misspelling of “acumen” , which BTW was used correctly.

My only additional comment on it is don’t you really hate it when you climb up on your high horse to disparage others intelligence and you screw up royally yourself? Then again, you are probably so used to it that it rolls off your back like water off a duck.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:32 am

“you sound a lot younger than you claim despite reputable evidence to the contrary. ”
——————————-

I retired when I was 53yrs old. You can do that when you’ve got a good UNION job. You don’t have to work until you’re dead.

Give em hell Anthony!

I’ll have to search for it, but I recall you saying you collected pension in your 30s due to a work injury . . and if you remember our previous encounter as I do, you know I harbor sympathy for unionization.

Kam Fet says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:43 am
“Give em hell Anthony!”
__________________________

Greetings from the States, my European friend.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:45 am
I’ll have to search for it, but I recall you saying you collected pension in your 30s due to a work injury .
—————————-

I’d like to see where I ever made that statement. I’m sure you can prove it.

He put O’reily on the defencive. I don’t think Mr Beck would show up to debate him, neverrrr. lol.

LIke I said, I’ll have to search for it, but its a moot deal, really. In all honestly, I would’ve told you to go hell if you would have asked me for my NO. and state, I wouldn’t volunteer crap in PI to a stranger over the internet. “Things that make you go hmm,” and what not. But, I digress:

We’ve both derailed this comment section with a “debate” on a 3rd party’s post and your possible misrepresentation of yourself. Like I commented at least twice before: this is a useless argument.

So, tell me how Weiner is a great crusader for AmeriKa and Beck is the devil etc. etc. or address me no more on this particular comment section. My “ignorant, fourth grade intelligence of stupid” would really rather trade barbs about what Bill O or Weiner said instead of what Felix said.

:and scene:

Kam Fet says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:57 am
“He put O’reily on the defencive. I don’t think Mr Beck would show up to debate him, neverrrr. lol.”

Yea.

“lol,” indeed . . .

The segment was mostly just a shouting match to me with a couple of very outlandish comments breaking through. And after following Beck since this thing started last week, I think the man is salivating to “debate” Weiner. It’ll definitely make for interesting TV if it happens, but I hate to see private businesses thrown under the bus in this political cock fight.

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 3:11 am

Like I commented at least twice before: this is a useless argument.
————————-

Then why did you even jump into it in the first place?

Rogue-Comic says:
May 25, 2010 at 3:11 am
LIke I said, I’ll have to search for it, but its a moot deal, really. In all honestly, I would’ve told you to go hell if you would have asked me for my NO. and state,
——————————————–

Well if you think you’re going to find out personal information from that, you’re saddly mistaken.

” felixw says:
May 24, 2010 at 10:30 pm

Fox gives Beck critics air time during their most popular prime time show. And that is something that you will never see at MSNBC, CNN, CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, etc. etc.

And that is also why Fox is growing its audience, while the Thought Police at the other networks are losing theirs. People want to see frank and open debate between differing views, and not the filtered, censored, politically correct pablum that the Left wants them to consume. So they have no choice except to tune into Fox.”

—————————-
Are you kidding me?
It’s car crash ratings gold! ALL stations want opposing views on to give the people a chance to put their foot in their mouth.

Do you really think MSNBC, CNN, CBS News, ABC News, NBC News have not invited every single top conservative TEA party player onto their stations???? If you honestly don’t think they haven’t you must be delusional.

ANY station would LOVE to give Sarah Palin an open debate. How about Rand Paul just turning down the chance to go on one of those stations? Many of those political figures are not on those stations not because they are not given the opportunity, they are not on those stations because it is most often not in their best interest to do so.

Pull your head out of the FOX hole.

@Rogue-Comic: Private businesses are already getting thrown under the bus, follow John T’s link to an article from a non-political numismatic trade publication and while you’re there, if you’re in the market for gold, click around to compare prices.

@Grammie: As I’ve revealed in other threads, I’ve traded in coins as a kid and I’ve played mining stock as an adult.

My “expert” analysis is that the gold bubble probably won’t be popping soon, precisely because there are elements in the media who are telling their followers to buy and as long as there are people who believe in them, the price will be artificially inflated. There’s also a couple of other “fears” which have been driving the market for a long time and I see none of them letting up soon, so though it’s dependent largely on what I feel is hyped and irrational demand, I don’t think the bubble will burst next week.

Now as I’ve also said… Goldline advises their clients to be in a position to hold their investment for three to five years, probably because Goldlines fees are four or five times the standard, but if you were to hold your investment for three years, you’d be into the next administration and either you don’t think things will get better after the election or you’re “betting” against your own success.

@Magister: I’m Lex Luther-like in my investments; I prefer real estate over things such as gold and Gene Hackman’s comedic advice has kept me comfortable so far in the current economic meltdown. It seems I rely on comic villains for investment advice, not Weiners or Becks. The point though:

This business is a shakedown on Beck’s adverts targeting Goldmine specifically but the message has been sent; if you pitch your product on Beck’s show the government will come after you. This isn’t good no matter which side of the battlefield you plant you flag on. Thirty years ago Alice Keaton of Family Ties fame would have marched against tactics such as this.

You can hate Beck but hopefully you can hate government intimidation even more. Beat Beck with ideas not like a bully a on playground .

@John: because you were rude to John Simpson and Felix, and I really didn’t think it would carry on for over 100 posts. Do you have an opinion on the Weiner/Beck war?

the real john t says:
May 25, 2010 at 3:30 am
“Well if you think you’re going to find out personal information from that, you’re saddly mistaken.”
_________________________________________________________
John, it sucks, but if I had certain credentials, I could, which is why, in the internet age, privacy is under fire. And that’s not right. Which is why I continue to advice you to tell people like me to go to hell if they ask you for anything remotely PI. True or false on your words, I regret getting personal.

I tend to agree with you, Steve. There is much I dislike about Weiner, but he is always prepared. That’s a welcome change.

Weiner is always prepared? Prepared to LIE.

gordonbloyershow says:
May 25, 2010 at 8:29 am
Weiner is always prepared? Prepared to LIE.

When you are confronted with fact you called that a lie. You ought to be ashamed of yourself that you just cant accept the truth. This is blind following, you follow them weather they are right or wrong. The term useful idiot comes to mind!

Kam Fet says:
May 25, 2010 at 9:20 am
gordonbloyershow says:
May 25, 2010 at 8:29 am
Weiner is always prepared? Prepared to LIE.

When you are confronted with fact you called that a lie. You ought to be ashamed of yourself that you just cant accept the truth. This is blind following, you follow them weather they are right or wrong. The term useful idiot comes to mind!

Case in point, Obama worshippers.

Kam,
Just curious what you think of the fact that Weiner’s new press sec came directly from Media Matters who has been leading a boycott against Beck for a while and trying to get him off the air.

Poor ignorant Kam, what facts did Weiner present? You have no idea what you are talking about. You are not even a useful idiot. Your idiot rantings are hurtful to the left. Thank God.

I’m not surprised about the usual suspects (MichelleF and gordonbloyershow). You could be amongst thos who would vote against their own economic interests. Are you kidding me, so the Missouri Attorney Genral is also making false statements, or you think Weiner just pulled it out of his behind. Wake upppppppp!

You didn’t answer my question, which isn’t surprising.

What you think of the fact that Weiner’s new press sec came directly from Media Matters who has been leading a boycott against Beck for a while and trying to get him off the air.

Kam, I can see you need a little more time to figure out what to say. In the meantime, I was also wondering if you are at all bothered by the fact that several group with direct ties to the president of the united states are leading boycotts against a private citizen who coincidentally happens to disagree with Obama’s policies.

No MichelleF, I was busy with my own affairs. Unlike you who watch the blogs 24/7, I have a life. Michelle, Colour of change are leading a boycot of beck, are they not allowed under the freedom of speech. Just like beck does regularly, by comparing his fellow citizens to Nazis and Communists. So what goes around comes around. If you can dish it out, you should be able to take it. Now Beck is hiding behind his kids by stating they are after his kids. Now that sounds like a coward to me.

Michelle, this is not a joke you know. Playing with people’s emotion. Do you know to these people its like a game to them. Lets see who can say the most outrageous thing, so we can get in front of the Times magazine, or who gets the highest rating. If you think its ok to spout all those rubbish (which is protected under the first amendment) then those who are screaming boycott also have the right to do so weather you like it or not. Its up to the public to decide what to follow.

Just like beck does regularly, by comparing his fellow citizens to Nazis and Communists.

You’ll recall it was Nancy Pelosi who called the tea-parties brown shirts. You do know what a brown shirt is, right?

And you’re right, it’s not a joke, when the regime tries to shut down any voice of opposition, you are right about that.

Oh and as far as calling people communists, he’s using THEIR OWN WORDS. He didn’t call them communists, they refer to themselves as that. Let’s get your facts straght before maligning Beck.

lol, he’s being comparing them to Nazis before Miss Pelosi mentioned the people in crowd holding Obama signs in Nazi Uniform. There’s no pint debating you, you’d stick to a particular position even if you can see clearly that it wrong. I’ve laid it clear and you cant argue about it, but you keep going round and round. So if its fair game for beck to call them Nazi then they can boycott him. In the end its the money that count for most of them.

The market place will decide whether Goldline is a good deal or not. Weiner went after Goldline (an A+ rating from the BBB) instead of gold sellers with an F rating because he politically disagrees with Glenn Beck.

So can I assume you have a problem with Dem politicians recently saying that Republican’s are dangerously close to being seditious?

You have laid nothing out clear. I don’t have a problem with boycotts. What I ask you, is if YOU have a problem with boycotts that are seemingly coming straight from the whitehouse? Do you deny that this whitehouse tries to shut down any voice of opposition?

When you say I stick to a particular position, I think you could be projecting a bit.

If you attack, why are you srying foul if people fight back. I don’t get it. This is not the new testament, hit ma and I’d pray for you. Na na na na na., if you cant take it don’t throw it.

K i’m having trouble even decyphering your words. You obviously DON’T watch Glenn Beck and just get your talking points on him from Media Matters and the Daily Kos. Go back to your kool-aid, and maybe stop spiking it!

hahaha MichelleF you lost and doesn’t have anything now reverting to personal insult. Anyway, move on!

And Michelle F, who do you get your taking points from? Who’s kool-aid are you drinking? It all about a point of view and not MichelleF point of view.

As for you Gordonblowhard, you are by far the biggest partisan hack I have ever seen, you are worse than Limbaugh or Hannity……you are what is wrong with this country too many far left and far right people, who are ruining for the rest of us who are in the middle.

John t is the biggest retard on Mediaite!

Hey Scott,
I’m still waiting for your to post my racist comments. Remember you called me a racist a couple of times and everytime I ask you to provide proof you disappear. Still waiting for your to either prove it or apologize!

Oh, Kam Fet andScott Heckman, bawahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

NEW YORK (AP) — The Dow Jones industrials plunged below 10,000 Tuesday after traders dumped stocks on worries about the global economy and tensions between North and South Korea.

The Dow fell about 190 points in late morning trading. It has fallen 1,346 points, or more than 12 percent, from its recent high of 11,205, reached April 26. The Dow and broader stock indexes all fell about 2 percent.

Oil fell $2.27 to $67.94 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Gold rose.

@JohnSimpson,
what’s your point. You want to blame that too on people that disagree with you. Don’t base your life on speculators, who are worried about what’s happening or what might happen. That’s why they call it speculating. What happens if everything jumps up tomorrow, I bet you’d take credit for that or the free enterprise at work. But hey, when there’s a loss free enterprise goes out the window, then blame the communist. Take the good side of it as well as the negative. Don’t be a joker!

Kam,
This should make you and your lib friends happy:

Paychecks from private business shrank to their smallest share of personal income in U.S. history during the first quarter of this year, a USA TODAY analysis of government data finds.
At the same time, government-provided benefits — from Social Security, unemployment insurance, food stamps and other programs — rose to a record high during the first three months of 2010.

How’s that hope and change working for you?

Steve,
Still waiting for that apology. You’ll have to man up eventually and admit you are a liar.

Sorry, it’s Scott not Steve that is the race-baiting liar who needs to apologize.

MichelleF, it all has to do with you obvious hatred for our president and your total disregard for what Bush did. Plus I am one of many who have called you a racist. I just think the truth hurts, while I have nothing that says that you are a racist it has to do with you obvious love of those Tea Baggers, which we all know are racist. We never heard of teabaggers until we had a president of color. Beck is an obvious racist as well as Limbaugh and Hannity. They were never this critical of Clinton.

So Michelle, tell me who do you get your talking points from, who’s kool-aid or tea are you drinking.?

I will never apologize to something that is so obvious.

Haha, nice answer. I’ll take that as an admission that you have NO proof.

The fact that the left thinks it’s not possible to think this presidents policies are abhorent, without being a racist, says more about the left that the right.

Oh and I write my own talking points!

They were never this critical of Clinton.

Please tell me this was a joke!!

One aspect of racism is treating one race differently from another. Did criticism of the president only start since Obama took office? No. Every president we’ve ever had has been criticized. But since Obama is black, no criticism can be allowed without it being racist. If that’s the case, then isn’t Obama being treated differently than all the others?

You are the joke michelle if you can look in the mirror and say you don’t puppet Beck, Fox News Limpbaugh or any Conservative.
Michelle you were given proof and if the truth hurts so be it.
Michelle where were these teabaggers when W was messing up this country, where was the outrage then? HUH?
You are just about as incoherent as the Former Quitter Governor of Alaska.

Writer, where were these teabaggers that michellef talk so lovingly about when W. and Cheney were sending this country into domestic and financial ruin? That is my problem.

MichelleF, unlike you, I don’t just get informed from right wing talking points. Exapmple of your Wealth comparison, which you clearly got from Drudge. I am every where and try to be informed and not biased. You can see that you’ve lost the argument, by starting with oreily and weiner to racism and communism. By the way, I do not like the charge of racism being thrown out lightly, it should only be use for the people who deserve it. I believe when people start calling others racist and anti Semite, they are trying to shut the debate off, and I’m against that.

Michelle you were given proof and if the truth hurts so be it.

I ask you for a racist quote that I’ve used and you didn’t. How is that proof?

Paychecks from private business shrank to their smallest share of personal income in U.S. history during the first quarter of this year, a USA TODAY analysis of government data finds.
At the same time, government-provided benefits — from Social Security, unemployment insurance, food stamps and other programs — rose to a record high during the first three months of 2010.

Where is your criticism of BO?

Face it Scott, your charges or racism are purely projectionary on your part.

I’ve ask this question of King more times than I can count and he ducks it EVERY time.

Do YOU think blacks can be racist?

Exapmple of your Wealth comparison, which you clearly got from Drudge.

Yeah and it is a link from that conservative publication USA Today.

I believe when people start calling others racist and anti Semite, they are trying to shut the debate off, and I’m against that.

Then I take it you are against the fact that any criticism of Obama is considered racist nowadays? I’m so glad to hear that.

Scott Heckman

You are a racist! And Bush ruined the economy? Let’s see what BHO has done to it:

Obama Presides Over Most Jobs Lost Since 1940
By Julia A. Seymour
Business & Media Institute
1/8/2010 11:03:00 AM

Unemployment shot up in 2009 from 7.7 percent in January to 10.1 percent in October before settling at 10 percent in December. Behind those percentages were more than 4.1 million people who lost their jobs during the year. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that’s the most job losses in a year since 1940. (BLS could only provide data from 1940-2009)

Oh, snap!

As for the deficit, CBO shows that over the first three years of the Obama Presidency, 2009-2011, the federal government will borrow an estimated $3.7 trillion. THAT IS MORE THAN THE ENTIRE ACCUMULATED NATIONAL DEBT FOR THE FIRST 225 YEARS OF U.S. HISTORY.

Oh, snap!

Deficit climbs to record under Obama’s budget

$3.8 trillion budget: Jobs take priority; reaction swift
February 02, 2010|By Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau

Washington — President Obama’s $3.8 trillion budget blueprint for next year sets a new deficit record of $1.56 trillion, includes a big jobs program and rolls back Bush-era tax cuts for high-income Americans.

Oh, snap!

Kam Fet says:
May 25, 2010 at 12:08 pm

@JohnSimpson,
what’s your point.”

A 12 % drop in the market in 4 weeks is not a vicissitude – BHO’s reckless policies are coming home to roost!

Scott, if Bush had been black, would you have still criticized his policies? Or would you have believed that you’d better stay quiet, so as not to look like a racist? You seem to be seeing Obama as a black man first, and president second. Believe it or not, it is possible to disagree with a person of another race with out it being racist. I know this is a shocking concept to the left, but it’s true.

Well Jeffy Simpson, ooops I mean John Simpson, Obama had to do something and remember that W. started the bailout and government take overs not Obama. How can you blame Obama for unemployment when the economy was still realing from the effects of Bush just being a lame duck.
Michelle yes I think blacks can be racists.

Writer, where were those teabaggers when Bush was putting this country economy in the toilet. HMM?
What about Rand Paul who had to spin his way out of a easy Civil Rights question from Rachel Maddow?
Teabag rallies are Klan meeting without the hoods.

Yeah, Scott. No one ever criticized Bush, or called him names, or made nasty signs about him, or any of that other stuff. All this protesting is brand new, and only came about after Obama took office. Until then, presidents were never criticized.

Scott Heckman says:

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the old “I inherited defense.”

Yeah, like he inherited the oil spill, the faux Stimulus Bill and the abominable HCR law, which now 63% of people want to repeal before it’s implemented- great accomplishments, Scott!

You picked a winner!

LMAO

Oh, and scooty, child-

I guess most of the American people are racist, eh?

LOL

Rasmussen
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Overall, 42% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president’s performance. That is the lowest level of approval yet measured for this president. Fifty-six percent (56%) now disapprove of his performance.

Writer,
those were war rallies that were against the war, not against government.
Teabaggers are against big government and tell me wasn’t that what Bush started? So where were they then?

Jeffy Simpson, the oil spill was not Obama’s fault, it was the party of “Drill baby Drill”

So Jeffy are you just mad that your horse fluffing business did not get any stimulus?

BTW, scooty, is fully 1/3 through his presidential term. People wanted a commander-In-chief,not the blamer-in-chief which we have now.

So what is your point, Scott? That since we have a black president, we should do away with the right to protest?

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:09 pm

the oil spill was not Obama’s fault, it was the party of “Drill baby Drill”

No, no, no son- the rig had not even begun to pump oil, child! They were still drilling for oil when the spill occurred and it was BHO’s Dept. of Interior who exempted BP from the required environmental impact study.

You should be on “Dancing Withe the Stars!”

resorting to homophobia- the mark of a libby!

Btw Jeffy, Rasmussen is a Fox news supported poll so that is a joke,
Gallup shows a 48% job approval while 42% do not approve.

Another thing Jeffy, been stalking Johnt lately?

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:14 pm

Btw Jeffy, Rasmussen is a Fox news supported poll so that is a joke,
Gallup shows a 48% job approval while 42% do not approve.

LOL Yeah, spin it libby!

Another thing Jeffy, been stalking Johnt lately?”

YOU ARE THAT FOOL!

ROTHFLMAO!

Folks, this fool is the real john t- the biggest ignoramus on Mediaite!

Um Scott,
Rasmussen polls LIKELY voters and it typically the most accurate. Deal with it!

oh btw, 63% now support repealing obamacare! Man there are alot of racists in this country!

Writer, answer the question I am saying where were the teabaggers? Not war protesters TEABAGGERS!!!!

Jeffy wrong again it was Halliburton and Bushies Department of Interior who exempted BP.

So Jeffy how is the stalking going?

Oh, and scooty, is CBS supported by FOX?

CBS POLL: Obama’s Approval Rating Hits New Low. “President Obama’s overall job approval rating has…

I
CBS POLL: Obama’s Approval Rating Hits New Low. “President Obama’s overall job Approval Rating has fallen to an all-time low of 44 percent, down five points from late March, just before the Health bill’s passage in the House of Representatives. It’s down 24 points since his all-time high last April. Forty-one percent of those polled said they disapproved of the president’s performance.”

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:18 pm
Writer, answer the question I am saying where were the teabaggers? Not war protesters TEABAGGERS!!!!

Scott,
First of all, the tea party movement wasn’t around then. And second of all, if you think that conservatives didn’t have a problem with Bush’s spending, you are absolutely delusional. You’re just remember it how you want to.

Oh and Obama had the power to change anything Bush supposedly did to aid BP with the stroke of a pen and didn’t so you’re argument holds NO water. Oh and btw, the regime was set to give BP a safety award the day after the spill, so you lose again. Your blindness when it comes to obama is scary.

Scooty, you lies are so obvious now!

U.S. exempted BP’s Gulf of Mexico drilling from environmental impact study

Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 5, 2010

The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last year.

The decision by the department’s Minerals Management Service (MMS) to give BP’s lease at Deepwater Horizon a “categorical exclusion” from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on April 6, 2009 — and BP’s lobbying efforts just 11 days before the explosion to expand those exemptions — show that neither federal regulators nor the company anticipated an accident of the scale of the one unfolding in the gulf. ”

36Share
view & vote:
The Latest Green Cars

slideshow:
Captivating Animal Portraits

video:
Apt. Transforms Into 24 Rooms

Why Did the Obama Admin Exempt the Deepwater Horizon From Environmental Impact Study?
by Matthew McDermott, New York, NY on 05. 6.10

“It somehow boggles the mind, doesn’t it? But you’re reading the title correctly. BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil rig was exempted from having an detailed environmental impact study done by the Department of Interior last year. The Washington Post looked at federal documents and found that the department’s Mineral Management Service have the project a “categorical exclusion” from review, something which BP had been lobbying for more broadly just prior to the explosion that kicked of this series of tragic events. ”

Oh, snap- joth t you are dumb!

Okay, Scott. Now the protesters have a name attached to them. And they don’t like Obama’s policies. And they only popped up since Obama has been in office. Again, what is your point? That they have no right to protest?

Michelle, as soon as most Americans see what Obamacare will do, people will change they’re minds?

Michelle you can disagree with Obama and not be racist unless you are a teabagger or support the movement like you do. Sorry wrong again.

Jeffy, Obama will be re-elected because the republican have no one that can beat him. He took over a mess and sure his policies might not be popular, but he want what is best for us. Unlike Lame Duck Bushie.

Scott Heckman -you are john t- the dumbest lib on Mediaite!

I caught you lying again and what do you do?

Bring up Bush- what a cretin you are.

And johnny boy:

CBS POLL: Obama’s Approval Rating Hits New Low. “President Obama’s overall job approval rating has…

CBS POLL: Obama’s Approval Rating Hits New Low. “President Obama’s overall job Approval Rating has fallen to an all-time low of 44 percent, down five points from late March, just before the Health bill’s passage in the House of Representatives. It’s down 24 points since his all-time high last April. Forty-one percent of those polled said they disapproved of the president’s performance.”

LMAO!

Big difference between a war protester and a teabagger. One protest against war and the other protest against everything government. You are missing the point, unless you support those teabaggers

and the other protest against everything government. ”

like this, john t??

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621

You are pathetic!

Scott Heckman says:

john t, do you condemn what the people did in this link?

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621

Yes or no?

johnny boy, yes or no? Do you reject what they did?

Scott, the reason for the protest is irrelevant. How do you determine what’s okay to protest and what isn’t? It’s the right to protest that shouldn’t be infringed upon, regardless of what’s being protested.

JohnSimpson says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:35 pm

Scott Heckman

do you condemn what the people did in this link?

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621

Yes or no?

writer says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:40 pm

Scott, the reason for the protest is irrelevant. How do you determine what’s okay to protest and what isn’t?”

He is john t.

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:30 pm
Big difference between a war protester and a teabagger. One protest against war and the other protest against everything government. You are missing the point, unless you support those teabaggers

I know you libs think using the term teabagger makes you sound cool, but it’s pretty pathetic. The honest truth is you can’t stand any criticism of this president, but you are just going to have to get over that. He brought it on himself by saying he was going to “fundementally transform America”. He reached TOO far to the left too fast and it woke the silent majority. Now, you have to deal with those consequences.

Hey Jeffy,
Lets talk about you stalking peoples families, you want to get into that you scumbag.

Obama is president and it just kills you.

Guys John Simpson aka Olby Suck, AKA Jeffy Morril is a troll and a stalker who is borderline psycho.

This is the second time Scooty, I mean john t, has complained about things done by the right and then completely ignores what the left has done.

Scooty, it’s called being hypocritical and I think INB called you a “coward” for this, and you are a COWARD!

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:27 pm
Michelle, as soon as most Americans see what Obamacare will do, people will change they’re minds?

Scott, support has dropped since it was implemented. You lose!

JohnSimpson says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:40 pm

JohnSimpson says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:35 pm

Scott Heckman

do you condemn what the people did in this link?

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621

Yes or no?

Scooty, we are awaiting your reply, COWARD!

Right Michelle nothing like white people bitching about civil rights that is so rich. They are teabaggers and as Rand Paul has showed they are racist.

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:45 pm

Lets talk about you stalking peoples families, ”

Why? First you wanted to talk about Bush, then you lied about the oil spill, and now you want to talk about stalking families?

You are pathetic, and a COWARD!

Michelle Obama care has not take effect not for 2 years or so, you lose racist.

Jeffy, the proof is that Obama is president, will be re elected and soon he will hopefully shut down you horse jackoff business. Coward.

ohnSimpson says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:46 pm

JohnSimpson says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:40 pm

JohnSimpson says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:35 pm

Scott Heckman

do you condemn what the people did in this link?

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621

Yes or no, COWARD?

he will hopefully shut down you horse jackoff business”

That would put your mom out of business, coward!

Scott Heckman

do you condemn what the people did in this link?

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621

Yes or no, COWARD?

Was not a lie that Oil well was put in the ocean on Bushies watch.

Hey Jeffy should I copy some of the things you put on my facebook page on here and let the people know what kind of sick fuck you are.

Scott, you are just sad. I hope you get over your hatred of whitey one day.

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:18 pm

Jeffy wrong again it was Halliburton and Bushies Department of Interior who exempted BP.”

A BIG FAT LIBBY LIE FROM YOU COWARD!

Sure don’t Jeffy, unless those sign said the same about you.

Hey Scott,
What do you think of the fact that according to the CBO, Obamacare will cost WAY more than projected and not only that but that the regime knew this when they were saying otherwise?

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:51 pm

Was not a lie that Oil well was put in the ocean on Bushies watch.

Hey Jeffy should I copy some of the things you put on my facebook page on here and let the people know what kind of sick fuck you are.”

LOL

He just proved it was john t- from his stupidity to his reference about FB!

I nailed you, coward!!

I dont care, as long as it help people who need it.

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:55 pm

Sure don’t Jeffy, unless those sign said the same about you.”

A fking libby union thug coward.

Jeffy what did you do when AAP came to you house tough guy?

A fking libby union thug coward.

Jealous because at least I have a job and not a job that sucks off horses all day.

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:56 pm

Jeffy what did you do when AAP came to you house tough guy?”

Hey coward, what are you going to do when ICE comes to your door, johnny boy?

“In a stunning revelation Wednesday, several top US corporations are seriously considering dropping employee health insurance coverage in light of what they see as the inevitable consequence of Obamacare–skyrocketing costs”

“The companies state that after their legal experts poured over the thousands of pages in the new law, it will cost them less to pay the fines for not providing healthcare coverage for employees than continuing to provide employer-paid health insurance benefits.”

(Bloomberg) — The Mayo Clinic, praised by President Barack Obama as a national model for efficient health care, will stop accepting Medicare patients as of tomorrow at one of its primary-care clinics in Arizona, saying the U.S. government pays too little.

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 1:57 pm

A fking libby union thug coward.

Jealous because at least I have a job and not a job that sucks off horses all day.”

Your mom was a moron and it runs in the family.

Still Michelle, we have no idea what Obama will or will not do. I am willing to give it a chance.

johnny boy, the BP people on the rig were union thugs like you, COWARD!

Well Michelle while I respect your opinion I will disagree with most of it. As I look bag I think that racist was harsh, I will just say I think your dislike for Obama is no different that my dislike for Bush.

Jeffy, Nice comment about a dead woman. thanks
Shows the classy person you are.

I am off to work Jeffy and yes it is an over pain union job. and I love it.

Jeffy and those people died, wow what a heartless coward you are then again you come from the “Drill Baby Drill Party”

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

Well Michelle while I think most teabagger are racist, I think you are just as passionate as me when it come to our political parties. I do apologize.

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:04 pm

Jeffy, Nice comment about a dead woman. thanks”
Shows the classy person you are.”

Like you?

“where were these teabaggers that michellef talk so lovingly about ….”

“So Jeffy are you just mad that your horse fluffing business did not get any stimulus?

“Hey Jeffy should I copy some of the things you put on my facebook page on here and let the people know what kind of sick fuck you are.”

“Jealous because at least I have a job and not a job that sucks off horses all day.”

“Lets talk about you stalking peoples families, you want to get into that you scumbag.

Yeah, you are a class act, you Fking libby hypocrite and coward- go back to your sewer and STFU, ahole!

Scott Heckman
Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:09 pm

Well Michelle while I think most teabagger are racist,.”

You are the very definition of a bigot.

hey here is an easy one coward?

Do you support the Federal Immigration Laws?

I don’t support Congressman Weiner but I do recognize his overall brillance and the fact that he is a superior preson. He graduated from Brooklyn Technical High School and only the best people in the world graduated from Brooklyn Tech. Tech graduates are superior in every way and modest to a fault.

Scott Heckman says:
May 25, 2010 at 2:09 pm
Well Michelle while I think most teabagger are racist, I think you are just as passionate as me when it come to our political parties. I do apologize.

In all sincerity, I think you are really wrong about that.

I do not believe the unions have yet infested the oilpatch of the Louisiana Gulf Coast Region.

If unions had “infested” BP’s operations, eleven people might not be dead and billions in damage might have been avoided.

Details of events leading up to the explosion, fire and spill are emerging – pointing to possible improper shortcuts and safety violations. Unions typically require safety inspectors with the power to “blow the whistle” on misconduct.

Similarly, if unions had “infested” Massey’s coal operation, a couple dozen more workers might not be dead.

If you care more about corporate profits than human lives, God forgive you. I won’t.

Where is the outrage for Toyota advertising on Libby networks, careening off a raveen due to ghosts in the machine seems a hell of lot worse to your well being than picking up some gold for a broker fee.