He actually did that very respectfully .

Blatant disrespect and then says I think she is decent human being. He wouldn’t know decent if it smacked him square in the face. He’s disgusting.

Big Eddie said:
He actually did that very respectfully .

You Beck followers are so blind it’s pathetic. He clearly was most certainly DISRESPECTFUL!

Yeah, Maxine, because libs are never disrespectful to George Bush. HAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Perhaps it’s you who is blind and pathetic!

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Yeah, Maxine, because libs are never disrespectful to George Bush. HAHAHAHAHAHAH! Perhaps it’s you who is blind and pathetic!

Run off, little girl to get ready for your garage sale.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Yeah, Maxine, because libs are never disrespectful to George Bush. HAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Perhaps it’s you who is blind and pathetic!

Seeing 2012 From My Window says:
November 22, 2010 at 12:24 pm (Quote)
2 3
Hey Donna,
If I’m so hateful, how come no lefty has ever been able to point to one hateful post from me, the numerous times I’ve asked? Hey if you have one, let me have it!

Guess that didn’t take long to prove.

Some republicans will never learn to keep their mouths shut about Palin that includes George Will.
If Palin runs she will have to win debates against formidable opponents. If she wins all these clowns will have to face their ignorant past comments. If she doesn’t they can say I told you so. Not likely.
I don’t know why they are worried about Palin facing Obama? He has proven that he has no idea what he is doing. He didn’t really win the debates against McCain and McCain was terrible. She beat Biden by a wide margin even Will and other naysayers were surprised.
How does Will know that she is NOT getting ready by going over the issues with consultants at home?
These republicans just like to have the libs praise them for being anti-Palin. Suck ups.
She is helping the party far more than ANY of the Bush’s are. Bush the elder is hanging with Clinton and they younger won’t say anything bad about the most ignorant president we have ever had. How does that help anyone?

So Hawk, me turning someones own comment back on them makes me hateful? If that’s all you got, I think I’ll be able to sleep just fine knowing I’m not a hateful person. Nice try though!!

gordonbloyershow said:
Bush the elder is hanging with Clinton and they younger won’t say anything bad about the most ignorant president we have ever had. How does that help anyone?

Well, it shows that not everyone believes that the two sides are mortal enemies. It helps to show that most people don’t demonize and dehumanize others solely on the basis of political differences.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
So Hawk, me turning someones own comment back on them makes me hateful? If that’s all you got, I think I’ll be able to sleep just fine knowing I’m not a hateful person. Nice try though!!

I wasn’t turning your comment around. I was showing that you tried to make yourself out to be fair and not hateful, and not long after showed that you’re no better that than el Gordo the Blowhard.

It was a nice try, and a successful try.

This should be a fun next two years, watching Republicans and Conservatives tear each other apart!

He must like the Cheney family MUCH more.
How does he feel about Laura Bush, on a sidenote? I don’t see how anyone couldn’t like her.

When will Rush Limbaugh attack her, like he did McCain’s mom when she snubbed him?

Hawk says:

I wasn’t turning your comment around. I was showing that you tried to make yourself out to be fair and not hateful

Um, it was me that was turning someone elses comment back on them. This was maxine’s comment that I was responding to:

You Beck followers are so blind it’s pathetic.

Now, let me know if you really have something, otherwise, no need to waste my time and embarrass yourself.

Conservatives laughing at Palin is only going to worse from here on out. Since you tea-bloggers will always be blind to what a joke she is my only advice to you is to just try and get used to it.

gordonbloyershow said:
Some republicans will never learn to keep their mouths shut about Palin that includes George Will.
If Palin runs she will have to win debates against formidable opponents. If she wins all these clowns will have to face their ignorant past comments. If she doesn’t they can say I told you so. Not likely.
I don’t know why they are worried about Palin facing Obama? He has proven that he has no idea what he is doing. He didn’t really win the debates against McCain and McCain was terrible. She beat Biden by a wide margin even Will and other naysayers were surprised.
How does Will know that she is NOT getting ready by going over the issues with consultants at home?
These republicans just like to have the libs praise them for being anti-Palin. Suck ups.
She is helping the party far more than ANY of the Bush’s are. Bush the elder is hanging with Clinton and they younger won’t say anything bad about the most ignorant president we have ever had. How does that help anyone?

You are the idiot who repeatedly swore Christine O’Donnell was going to win. Those posts looked a lot like this post.

No one is going to take your sorry-ass analysis seriously anymore. Stick to making fun of peoples user names. It’s what you’re good at.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Now, let me know if you really have something

You said you didn’t say anything hateful…. You did. Another post claimed Beck followers to be blind and pathetic. That was said due to the fact that Beck followers, such as yourself, NEVER have a disagreement with the guy and do, in fact, blindly follow everything he says.

If you’re not blind, and not hateful to those that disagree with Beck, then prove me wrong and I promise I will apologize. To prove it so you’ll have to prove to me that you do not blindly agree with everything Glenn Beck says or believes in. I’ve seen you blindly agree with everything Beck, Limbaugh, Palin, and Hannity say… and disagree with everything that a liberal (like being a liberal is fungus) says.

I want to be able to apologize, so please, show me that I need to.

Can we not all agree that when you are asked what is now the standard yet infamous… “What do you think of Sarah Palin?” question, one needs to realize that you have been asked the question from interview hell. Their is no middle ground on this one nor I dare say any upside to answering this question. You are screwed. All you can do at this point is to minimize the damage to ones reputation. Sorry, I like Ms Bush (Mama version) but when you are clearly on the bash Sarah side of the line you have awoken the Palinistas and the devils wrath they bring with them.

On the opposite side if she complemented Ms Palin then the hate Palin crowd would have called her senile… that would be the nicest thing.

God, I hate these “what do you think of Sarah Palin?” questions…

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Hawk says: I wasn’t turning your comment around. I was showing that you tried to make yourself out to be fair and not hateful Um, it was me that was turning someone elses comment back on them. This was maxine’s comment that I was responding to: You Beck followers are so blind it’s pathetic. Now, let me know if you really have something, otherwise, no need to waste my time and embarrass yourself.

There is nothing hateful about me saying blind and pathetic. It’s sympathy I have for them. Not hatred.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Yeah, Maxine, because libs are never disrespectful to George Bush. HAHAHAHAHAHAH! Perhaps it’s you who is blind and pathetic!

Oh and by the way, go to the Mrs Bush thread and read how some of your own party are saying hateful things about her.

Maxine said:
Oh and by the way, go to the Mrs Bush thread and read how some of your own party are saying hateful things about her.

Why can’t liberals dis liberals and conservatives dis conservatives?

Are you guys all supposed to act like robots who blindly march to a D or R shaped drum?

Is that in the fine print when you sign up?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Bershad wrote, “Beck claims that the TV host makes Barbara Bush “look like she’s 30″. Now that’s insulting!”

Naw, that’s just Beck being Beck. SOS, DD. In this case, he’s adding to the long list of people he’s alienated over the years. People of faith working for social justice, certain Christians who see his faith as a cult, some in his own faith alarmed at his violent rhetoric, virtually all blacks, many Jews, everyone to the left of Joe Lieberman, Joe Lieberman, … basically all but the gullible plebes who follow this rodeo clown and his like-minded reactionaries like Gordon, the blow hard with a show.

Does anyone want to guess what the story about Beck that is coming out soon is going to expose about him?
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/11/what-is-glenn-beck-getting-nervous.html

Gordon, if you’re still reading this, you have to cite proof of my supposed lies. Just calling me a liar because that’s your opinion is…what’s the word?….oh yeah, STUPID. And deceitful (your forte).

Of course, being a student of propaganda, you’ll ignore what I just wrote and keep making your baseless charges against me.

gordonbloyershow said:
Some republicans will never learn to keep their mouths shut about Palin

Sometimes Gordo will type a sentence so wrapped in delicious irony that he cannot fully appreciate it.

The above is just that sentence.

Gordon, reading your word soups give me such joy.

I thank you sir.

Kird said:
Why can’t liberals dis liberals and conservatives dis conservatives? Are you guys all supposed to act like robots who blindly march to a D or R shaped drum? Is that in the fine print when you sign up? Inquiring minds want to know.

No, that is not what I meant. I agree with what you said, and I have always stated that here. But the majority of R’s here will never find any fault of their own. No matter what. But in this case of Mrs Bush, they sure didn’t have a problem of being totally disrespectful as their buddy Beck up there.

Good for BECK!

I use to admire Barbara Bush and Martha Stewart until they made wise-cracks about Sarah Palin!

And BTW, VOTE for BRISTOL tonight on DWTS!

GlennBeckReview said:
Does anyone want to guess what the story about Beck that is coming out soon is going to expose about him?
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/11/what-is-glenn-beck-getting-nervous.html

What a CROC!

That story has been around for years! The guy’s name who raped the girl was spelled Glen Beck, not Glenn Beck!

Get REAL!

GlennBeckReview said:
Does anyone want to guess what the story about Beck that is coming out soon is going to expose about him?

Interesting. Confident? Not so much. Although, whatever it is, his loyal followers won’t believe. Unless there is some sort of irrefutable evidence. I think they’ll even be able to deny that and want it refudiated.

Maxine said:
No, that is not what I meant. I agree with what you said, and I have always stated that here. But the majority of R’s here will never find any fault of their own. No matter what. But in this case of Mrs Bush, they sure didn’t have a problem of being totally disrespectful as their buddy Beck up there.

So, you dis Rs for not dising their own, and then you dis them when they DO dis their own? Just say you’re going to dis Rs no matter what and be done with it unless, of course, you’ve got a soft spot for Babs.

wickerchino said:
When will Rush Limbaugh attack her, like he did McCain’s mom when she snubbed him?

Rush LUVs Sarah just as we do!

Watch this video:

Rush: Keep Your Hands Off My Teabag, Mr. President

http://www.breitbart.tv/rush-keep-your-hands-off-my-teabag-mr-president/

mcf1757 said:
This should be a fun next two years, watching Republicans and Conservatives tear each other apart!

We are not “Driving Ms. Pelosi” like the LEFT has to do!

HehHeh

Hawk says:

If you’re not blind, and not hateful to those that disagree with Beck, then prove me wrong and I promise I will apologize.

Well, it’s hard to prove a negative. How about this, when I get as hateful as BFD, black widow, donna, ted, iris, or King, PLEASE let me know and I will apologize. Until then, I will sleep well at night knowing I’m a pretty likable person (to sane folk).

Maxine says:

There is nothing hateful about me saying blind and pathetic. It’s sympathy I have for them. Not hatred.

Well, according to Hawk, there is. Take it up with him.

BFD, you are a truly disgusting human being. Hey I heard you molested your next door neighbor, want to comment?

juan said:
We are not “Driving Ms. Pelosi” like the LEFT has to do!

HehHeh

No, you are incorrect. It is Ms. Pelosi who is still driving the left much too Heath Shuler’s chagrin, at least in the House.

GBR’s site has an anonymous source saying there may be something bad coming out about Glenn Beck. This is the kind of hard hitting, unbiased journalism we’ve all been waiting for.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
BFD, you are a truly disgusting human being. Hey I heard you molested your next door neighbor, want to comment?

Oooops another Gotcha with the hate!

Why, Beck & all REpugs should be proud of Barbara. Back in 1969, Pres Nixon, discussing his own “Enemies List,” was talking about “hate.” He stated, & I quote directly from his famous tapes, “HATE?? NO ONE hates like Barbara Bush hates!!” History. Look it up, fools. She’s a great GOPster. Typical.

Just because Beck’s entitled to his opinion, doesn’t mean that you are,Barbara, Silly woman!

Maxine said:
Run off, little girl to get ready for your garage sale.

Nice. You sound so grown up. Just kidding, actually, you sound like a condescending bitch.

Hawk11 said:
Seeing 2012 From My Window says:
November 22, 2010 at 12:24 pm (Quote)
2 3
Hey Donna,
If I’m so hateful, how come no lefty has ever been able to point to one hateful post from me, the numerous times I’ve asked? Hey if you have one, let me have it!

Thanks Hawk

gordontheblowhardwithashow says:
“Some republicans will never learn to keep their mouths shut about Palin that includes George Will.”

And Barbara Bush. I’m convinced (and Blow Hard with a show, this is an opinion, so you can’t accuse me of “lying” as you love to falsely claim) that the old guard of the Republican Party, moderates and conservatives, see the reactionary Palin as a threat to their hopes of taking back the White House in 2012. They understand that their base is susceptible to good looks, empty one-liners and a few winks (it was enough for Ronald Reagan), so no matter who actually wins any debates that you keep mentioning, she might win the nomination, qualified or not.

That would be a disaster for the Republicans.

Run, Sarah, run! Run (away from Katie Couric).

Mr.Papshmer said:
Nice. You sound so grown up. Just kidding, actually, you sound like a condescending bitch.

Well, at least not mean and hateful. So it’s at least a step up from you and the window there.

*off to make some popcorn for this*

GlennBeckReview said:
Does anyone want to guess what the story about Beck that is coming out soon is going to expose about him?

Oh gee, let me guess… You’re going to call him a liar or an alcoholic or a shock jock. And I’m sure that everything he’s said up to now will suddenly become untrue because of some stupid crap you post on your pathetic website.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
BFD, you are a truly disgusting human being. Hey I heard you molested your next door neighbor, want to comment?

WHAT DID I DO!??!?!

I think you got the wrong guy. lolol

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Well, it’s hard to prove a negative. How about this, when I get as hateful as BFD, black widow, donna, ted, iris, or King, PLEASE let me know and I will apologize. Until then, I will sleep well at night knowing I’m a pretty likable person (to sane folk).

Define what you mean by “sane folk” in the respect to this conversation.
So far you have done nothing to prove that you’re not hateful to those that you plainly call “libs”, or anyone that disagrees with your deity.
By turning the question around to me you do exactly what people like Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin do… You take what someone rightly points out derogatory toward you and turn it into something that the person asking the question is doing wrong.

Funny maxiine, I call someone disgusting for smeaing someone with a LIE that they are a rapist and I’m the hateful one. I’m learning SO much today from you libs about what is hateful and what’s not.

Barbara does look like the Quaker Oats guy.

Maxine said:
Thanks Hawk

My pleasure

BFD, sorry, it wasn’t you THIS time. I meant GBR. Apologizes.

“Americans, had enough? There are only two ways to change the current direction this country is headed. We tried the first one on November 2/2010, if that doesn’t work, I say it’s time to shed some blood.”

Now THAT is an INTERNET COMMENT!!!!111 Try finding TRUTH to POWER like that on a blog like THIS, where even the Right-Thinking Americans are NAMBY-PAMBYS!!!!111 Where did I find it, you ask?!?!?111 Why, the FOXNATION.COM of course!!!!111 And there’s TONS MORE!!!!111

So the next time you WHINY LIBS doubt the influence of FOX, or Beck, just hop on over to FOXNATION.COM and read the comments!!!!111 They are FIRED UP and ready to Take Back our Once Proud Republic!!!!!!111

writer says:
“GBR’s site has an anonymous source saying there may be something bad coming out about Glenn Beck. This is the kind of hard hitting, unbiased journalism we’ve all been waiting for.”

Nope, it’s not hard hitting journalism. It is closer to gossip reporting. The source is negotiating with a large paper for sale of this juicy piece about Mr. Beck.

When the story breaks, you’ll understand why Beck is so nervous. The difference between this story and the false story about Beck raping and killing a 19 yr. old girl is that this one is fact and backed up with by “witness.” Of all that I’ve worked on these last 7 months, this story is the one I’m least proud of. See the tease:

http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/11/what-is-glenn-beck-getting-nervous.html

It’s also not “may be,” the anonymous source is the journalist who’s going to break the story soon. I’m not at liberty to name the name yet, but when the story is published, there will be a by-line.

Just remember, when a story breaks about Beck (not by Beck) later this week: I gave you the hint that it’s coming (with permission of the source).

“Really though, it’s interesting to hear the Bushes, such stalwarts of the Republican community for so long, get dumped on like this.”

What planet have you been living on? Bush the elder has been getting dumped on by conservatives for like the nearly the last 30 years…certainly the last 20. Bush the elder would be classified as a RINO and there’s only one thing worse than a RINO…a Progressive. Beck’s reaction is neither atypical nor surprising.

Maxine said:
Well, at least not mean and hateful. So it’s at least a step up from you and the window there.

So where was I wrong? The condescending part? Or the bitch part? Well, you were certainly being condescending, which is an automatic qualifier for the bitch part. You may not consider yourself to be mean and hateful, but then again, Barack Obama doesn’t consider himself to be a stupid asshole. As we found out from his performance in Seoul, he is.

GlennBeckReview said:
writer says:
“GBR’s site has an anonymous source saying there may be something bad coming out about Glenn Beck. This is the kind of hard hitting, unbiased journalism we’ve all been waiting for.”

Nope, it’s not hard hitting journalism. It is closer to gossip reporting. The source is negotiating with a large paper for sale of this juicy piece about Mr. Beck.

When the story breaks, you’ll understand why Beck is so nervous. The difference between this story and the false story about Beck raping and killing a 19 yr. old girl is that this one is fact and backed up with by “witness.” Of all that I’ve worked on these last 7 months, this story is the one I’m least proud of. See the tease:

http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/11/what-is-glenn-beck-getting-nervous.html

It’s also not “may be,” the anonymous source is the journalist who’s going to break the story soon. I’m not at liberty to name the name yet, but when the story is published, there will be a by-line.

Just remember, when a story breaks about Beck (not by Beck) later this week: I gave you the hint that it’s coming (with permission of the source).

Dude, you sound like a whack-job. If you have what you say you have, what purpose would it serve to brag about it a comment section small web site?

GBR, even if a story comes out that Beck plowed into a busload of orphans because he was distracted by the porn on his cell phone, I can’t really see how it will affect me personally.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
BFD, sorry, it wasn’t you THIS time. I meant GBR. Apologizes.

No he wasn’t but in your haste to spread the hate you used the wrong initials.

Stephen Hogan said:
Well, it shows that not everyone believes that the two sides are mortal enemies. It helps to show that most people don’t demonize and dehumanize others solely on the basis of political differences.

Oh, like Barack Obama does and George W. Bush doesn’t? I get it!

No surprise here, conservatives eat their own.

writer said:
Barbara does look like the Quaker Oats guy.

The Quaker Oats guy always scared me when I was little. Good thing Barbara Bush wasn’t my grandmother if that was the case.

GlennBeckReview said:
Of all that I’ve worked on these last 7 months, this story is the one I’m least proud of.

I don’t envy you having to make that call.

GlennBeckReview said:
They understand that their base is susceptible to good looks, empty one-liners and a few winks (it was enough for Ronald Reagan), so no matter who actually wins any debates that you keep mentioning, she might win the nomination, qualified or not.

For the love of God, man, have you not seen the shiny empty suit we elected President?

Mr.Papshmer said:
So where was I wrong? The condescending part? Or the bitch part? Well, you were certainly being condescending, which is an automatic qualifier for the bitch part. You may not consider yourself to be mean and hateful, but then again, Barack Obama doesn’t consider himself to be a stupid asshole. As we found out from his performance in Seoul, he is.

No I’m not, but what are you? Give me a break.

Interesting that Reagan won twice in landslides simply because he wasn’t bad looking. The disastrous Carter years had nothing to do with it.

I think this pretty much proves that there is a profound difference between the Beck and Limbaugh followers, and decent Republicans. The GOP has been hijacked by these talk show creatures who preach hate, and their followers, who for whatever reason, blindly listen to every disgusting word spoken by Limbaugh, Beck, Savage and others of their ilk. These people are not Republicans. They are not patriots, rather they are armchair patriots who will sacrifice nothing, but declare they love their country. And then they will go on with foul comments about Barbara Bush and anyone else with the temerity to disagree with them.

Whereas you’ll never hear people on the left, such as Keith Olbermann, make foul comments about those who disagree with him.

Maxine said:
No I’m not, but what are you? Give me a break.

Wow, how mature of you.

writer said:
Whereas you’ll never hear people on the left, such as Keith Olbermann, make foul comments about those who disagree with him.

You have to know there is a vast difference between Olbermann and Beck?

alamo2 said:
The GOP has been hijacked by these talk show creatures who preach hate,

And you have never paid a moment’s attention to Glenn Beck. He is neither a Republican nor preaching hate. The cartoons in your head are just that.

These people are not Republicans. They are not patriots, rather they are armchair patriots who will sacrifice nothing, but declare they love their country.

Do you actually know any of “These people”? Like, in real life?

Maxine said:
You have to know there is a vast difference between Olbermann and Beck?

But yes, I have heard Keith make some remarks that made me cringe. You’re right about that.

You have to know there is a vast difference between Olbermann and Beck?

Yes. Beck gets much higher ratings.

Mr.Papshmer said:
Wow, how mature of you.

Geez I meant that as condescending. Guess I’m not so good at it, eh?

Maxine said:
You have to know there is a vast difference between Olbermann and Beck?

Yes, one sits behind a desk; one sits on a desk.

Maxine said:
You have to know there is a vast difference between Olbermann and Beck?

Yes, Nielsen makes a business of noting it. And then there’s Time. I love how they sneer while they grudgingly admit the obvious.

Kird said:
Yes, one sits behind a desk; one sits on a desk.

And one is a con man and the other is just a die hard liberal.

I’ll bet Beck eats Quaker Oats for breakfast.

SarahP said:
I’ll bet Beck eats Quaker Oats for breakfast.

PS – My apologizes for the imagery

Pablo said:
Yes, Nielsen makes a business of noting it. And then there’s Time. I love how they sneer while they grudgingly admit the obvious.

Not sure what your point is. If it’s that Olbermann is not on it, I could care less. I was only stating that they are completely two different kind of actors. One is dramatic the other is comedic.

GlennBeckReview said:
Nope, it’s not hard hitting journalism. It is closer to gossip reporting. The source is negotiating with a large paper for sale of this juicy piece about Mr. Beck.

Beck has threatened to sue about these rumors!

I hope he follows through like Sarah did with Gawker! And Gawker will have to pay damages!

HeeHee

Yes, Olbermann is dramatic. If by dramatic, you mean foaming at the mouth crazy.

Maxine said:
completely two different kind of actors. One is dramatic the other is comedic.

I actually don’t think Olbermann is acting; he might actually be a megalomaniac.

Kird said:
I actually don’t think Olbermann is acting; he might actually be a megalomaniac.

And Beck isn’t?

thanks sarah, now i wont be able to sleep tonight

writer said:
Yes, Olbermann is dramatic. If by dramatic, you mean foaming at the mouth crazy.

LOL he sure can do that at times.

Maxine said:
And Beck isn’t?

I think Beck is acting; I don’t think Olbermann is acting.

Spud said:
“Really though, it’s interesting to hear the Bushes, such stalwarts of the Republican community for so long, get dumped on like this.”

What planet have you been living on? Bush the elder has been getting dumped on by conservatives for like the nearly the last 30 years…certainly the last 20. Bush the elder would be classified as a RINO and there’s only one thing worse than a RINO…a Progressive. Beck’s reaction is neither atypical nor surprising.

Beck’s reaction may not be surprising and it could play to the “we dump on both parties narrative”, but no one can say that the former Party Chair wasn’t a true member. It seems membership would be one certain prerequisite to being put in charge.

writer says:
“GBR, even if a story comes out that Beck plowed into a busload of orphans because he was distracted by the porn on his cell phone, I can’t really see how it will affect me personally.”

I don’t expect this to affect the views of Beck from the left as I intimated on The Review. I’m not at liberty to offer any clues about this story, so I can’t write what section of his supporters will be most affected by the information. My guess at this point is that you, “writer” will believe Beck’s denials of the facts. Even if you accept them as true, it’s nothing that changes much. Beck will still be a liar, a hypocrite and a charlatan, only more embarrassed for a while. (Hopefully, the rest of his life.)

I initially argued against making this info public. The more sheer sleaziness that I heard from Beck over the last few months, the more I became inclined to change my argument FOR making this info public.

Kird says:
“… If you have what you say you have, what purpose would it serve to brag about it a comment section small web site?”

You mean The Review or MediaFight? What purpose does it serve to mention it at all? Talk about double standards, Beck builds up anticipation for stories he’s going to cover for days, sometimes longer; but we can’t do the same? I could go into hyper hype and say that it’s going to be a bombshell, but I’m not sure what effect it’s going to have quite honestly.

I was quite shocked by the information when I first heard it over two months ago. There is quite a bit about the details that I do not know about, but I’m fairly sure that the story should be sold to a larger magazine. That idea came from another detractor of Mr. Beck, but I don’t know if the journalist who literally stumbled into this info is going to find a buyer.

Pablo says:
“I don’t envy you having to make that call.”

Thanks. It’s a story that should be broken by the National Inquirer. They actually break some real news stories sometimes and lots of sleazy stuff. This “bombshell” is somewhere in between.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Yeah, Maxine, because libs are never disrespectful to George Bush. HAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Perhaps it’s you who is blind and pathetic!

We’re not disrespectful to an old woman. The right reserves that.
(see? I can make blazing generalizations too)

Kird said:
I think Beck is acting; I don’t think Olbermann is acting.

Another good point. At least Olbermann really believes in what he says and is not trying to fool some of the people all of the time.

We’re not disrespectful to an old woman.

HAHA, way to rationalize, RL!!

GBR, I don’t watch Beck often enough to be a fan. I just don’t find it necessary to have an obsessive hatred for the man the way you do. If you think every word he says is a lie, then don’t watch.

GlennBeckReview said:

Kird says:
“… If you have what you say you have, what purpose would it serve to brag about it a comment section small web site?”

You mean The Review or MediaFight? What purpose does it serve to mention it at all? Talk about double standards, Beck builds up anticipation for stories he’s going to cover for days, sometimes longer; but we can’t do the same? I could go into hyper hype and say that it’s going to be a bombshell, but I’m not sure what effect it’s going to have quite honestly.

No, I meant why are you hyping your bombshell here and not at sites with much larger traffic like Huffington or Kos.

Yes, I went to your blog, and you appear to follow the Beck model quite well.

It’s a story that should be broken by the National Inquirer. They actually break some real news stories sometimes and lots of sleazy stuff. This “bombshell” is somewhere in between.

Nevermind.

writer says:
“Yes. Beck gets much higher ratings.”

And cookies are more popular than salads, but it’s clear which are better for you.

Maxine said:
Another good point. At least Olbermann really believes in what he says and is not trying to fool some of the people all of the time.

I didn’t say Olbermann doesn’t distort; he does. I believe he’s a megalomaniac whose ends justify his means. To put it bluntly, I’m squarely with Team Koppel.

I think Beck is more like the anti-Oprah combined with a more progressive Howard Stern.

Kird says:
“No, I meant why are you hyping your bombshell here and not at sites with much larger traffic like Huffington or Kos.”

I don’t post or even read KOS at this point, and Huffington has an auditing system in place. I may not be able to post the URL there. If they run a story that involves Beck before the journalist breaks this story, I will certainly try.

Gee, I didn’t know watching Olbermann turn red and call names at anyone who disagrees with him could be good for you.

GlennBeckReview said:

I don’t post or even read KOS at this point, and Huffington has an auditing system in place. I may not be able to post the URL there. If they run a story that involves Beck before the journalist breaks this story, I will certainly try.

Well, there’s always places like newshounds and little green footballs. Moveon or Think Progress might even bite.

Fact: Thou shall not speak evil about other fellow Republicans. Quote: The great Ronald Reagan.
Fact: Liberals can’t be cured of their mental delusions with medication alone since it was found to be a genetic defect.

Pablo said:
Oh, like Barack Obama does and George W. Bush doesn’t? I get it!

No, not like that at all. Obama is reportedly close friends with Tom Coburn and enjoys a friendship with Richard Lugar.

juan said:
Beck has threatened to sue about these rumors!

There’s not a whole lot that would crack me up more than GBR being sued for posting unsubstantiated harmful gossip. :)

Mr.Papshmer said:
There’s not a whole lot that would crack me up more than GBR being sued for posting unsubstantiated harmful gossip. :)

There’s not a whole lot that would crack me up more than GBR be correct and all of you followers have to scramble to come up with excuses. I bet there’ll be some good ones.

Maxine said:
Another good point. At least Olbermann really believes in what he says and is not trying to fool some of the people all of the time.

I really wish you weren’t using Hallmark’s Maxine for your avatar.
You are violating her image.

Maxine said:
There’s not a whole lot that would crack me up more than GBR be correct and all of you followers have to scramble to come up with excuses. I bet there’ll be some good ones.

Can’t listen to his radio show at work, and his TV show comes on at two in the afternoon. Nice to see you pulling assumptions out of mid air. I do know that he pisses off leftist douchebags though, which is fine with me.

Big_F-ing_Deal said:
You are the idiot who repeatedly swore Christine O’Donnell was going to win. Those posts looked a lot like this post.
No one is going to take your sorry-ass analysis seriously anymore. Stick to making fun of peoples user names. It’s what you’re good at.

Why don’t you find those posts where I said O’Donnell was going to win? They don’t exist. What are you smoking. I think there was one or two people here that said that, but is wasn’t me.

Do you lie much?

juan said:
That story has been around for years! The guy’s name who raped the girl was spelled Glen Beck, not Glenn Beck!
Get REAL!

You have to remember GBR is a liar and has always been a liar.

GlennBeckReview said:
Thanks. It’s a story that should be broken by the National Inquirer. They actually break some real news stories sometimes and lots of sleazy stuff. This “bombshell” is somewhere in between.

Yes it is really bad. I can not let out the details. Are you ready?
Glenn Beck threw a spitball at his teacher in the second grade. This is the end of his career.

GBR spreads another lie. LOL.

Maxine said:
There’s not a whole lot that would crack me up more than GBR be correct and all of you followers have to scramble to come up with excuses. I bet there’ll be some good ones.

You don’t get it. That is NOT possible. GBR is a LIAR.

Maxine said:
Blatant disrespect and then says I think she is decent human being. He wouldn’t know decent if it smacked him square in the face. He’s disgusting.

WOW Maxine. Hypocrite Bigot must be your middle and last name. Way to go! NOT!

This may be my favorite Bloyer related thing on the Internet.

Saw this on an Amazon forum:

http://www.amazon.com/Woah-were-this-rocket-from/forum/Fx3SFS5L9IWXOTL/Tx2A17VGZ6A8200/2?_encoding=UTF8&asin=0226320545&cdSort=oldest&cdMessage=Mx2FA8562TA7V4B

And I quote:

In reply to an earlier post on June 10, 2010 9:10 AM PDT
Gordon Bloyer says:

[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. ]

Sometimes these things write temselves.

This guy is such a phony and the public is finally catching on more and more.

Once a plutocrat, always a plutocrat.

http://www.nhgazette.com/display/?id=156

glenn113 said:
This guy is such a phony and the public is finally catching on more and more.

It’s always comical when lefties project their own hopes as fact.

Trouble in Tea Bag City.
It’s always comical when Tea Baggers think they can tell Fact from Fiction.
Lucky people in Philadelphia aren’t forced to listen to Becky or Hannity on the radio now that they’ve been dropped from that market.

It still amazes me how quick Republicans are to throw Barbara Bush under the bus, after one comment about one politician.

Democrats say the Republicans are kicking out anybody that doesn’t tow the line 100%. Republican say that’s nonsense, and they’re a big tent party. Then, in an effort to kill their own argument, Republicans throw anyone under the bus that dares to think independently.

Beck you are one dry drunk and a terrible voice for the AA program—you are disgusting in your remarks of Barbara Bush—-but than you wouldn’t know are you really sober?????? because it seems you act just like a typical grand standing drunk go to a few meeting and get out of the pity pot room and work the program instead of you thinking you’ll a god.

first off, Barbra Bush shouldn’t have attacked Sarah Palin like that, and Mr. Beck has gone a little far calling Barbra Bush “oatmeal box lady” (although I do admit that is sort of funny)
what Beck is trying to point out is that the Republicans has lost their conservative roots and forgotten their principles and the U.S Constitution in favor for power, money, and entitlements. the Democrats lost their principles of fighting for the little guy for the same power, money, and entitlements. the principles of progressives are power, money, and entitlements and progressives can be very arrogant, that’s the same corruption that has infected both the democrats and republicans, both parties have lost their principles are are toxic. Sarah Palin is trying to bring back the principles what Republicans and Democrats suppose to be for: conservative roots, fighting for the little guy, open to new ideas, keeping traditions like the U.S Constitution, help one another and move this country foreword by putting people first and respecting the U.S Constitution

gordontheblowhardwithashow says:
“GBR spreads another lie. ”

Gordon, the blow hard with a show, has no idea what the story will be, but he’s already declared it a lie.

Gorden, your crass and sheer stupidity is showing again.

AND, I’m not the journalist covering and writing the story, so I’m not spreading it. I will point to the story when it comes out, and hopefully it will change Beck’s life forever.

http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/11/what-is-glenn-beck-getting-nervous.html

glenn113 said:
“[Beck] is such a phony and the public is finally catching on more and more.”

Mr.Papshmer says:
“It’s always comical when lefties project their own hopes as fact.”

No, Papshmer, unless you believe that faith, hope and charity hold up the Constitution, you HAVE to concede that Beck is a phony when it comes to actually understanding the subject he talks about. He has no college, but even a high school graduate knows that the SCOTUS upholds the Constitution. Beck is a phony! You would be ashamed to defend Beck if you had a basic high school understanding of basic American civics.

http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/07/glenn-beck-thinker-pundit-or-charlatan.html

Drew says:

“Sarah Palin is trying to bring back the principles what Republicans and Democrats suppose to be for: conservative roots, fighting for the little guy, ….”

If you think that unleashing the transnational corporations, which is what conservative principles allow, is “fighting for the little guy,” you need to wake up and small the Libertarian mythology.

Palin and other reactionaries want to tear down the wall of separation between church and state. For that alone they should be recognized for what they are: an American version of the Afghan Taliban and fundamentally anti-Constitutional.

Drew, your problem is that you believe the horsecrap that comes out of Beck’s mouth. Beck peppers his narratives with facts to cleverly convey that he’s telling the truth and then tells a story that is not about reality. He paints an alternative world view and then claims that he’s got a special insight. It’s true, when one has their head up their ass, it gives them a special and unique perspective.

Seriously, Drew, you are following and parroting a rodeo clown, self-promoting entertainment genius who is successfully fooling millions of his minions all of the time. Beck skill at the hoodwinking doesn’t make him right; it makes Lincoln seem like a visionary. Lincoln was right: you can fool some of the people all of the time. What people? Gullible fools. Drew, I wouldn’t be too proud of your affinity for this clown and self-proclaimed messenger of God. Beck is the bastard offspring from when Lonesome Rhodes had sex with Elmer Gantry. (Hey, it’s fiction; since Beck creates a fictional understanding of the world, I will exercise dramatic license to make Beck the offspring of gay sex.)

You want to understand any of Beck’s many false claims? Check it out for yourself:
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/06/contents.html

GlennBeckReview said:
Pablo says:
“I don’t envy you having to make that call.”

Thanks. It’s a story that should be broken by the National Inquirer. They actually break some real news stories sometimes and lots of sleazy stuff. This “bombshell” is somewhere in between.

No, no. I’m referring to you having to pick the most embarrassing thing you’ve written. That’s like having to pick the worst piece of hay in a huge decomposing haystack.

GlennBeckReview said:
You would be ashamed to defend Beck if you had a basic high school understanding of basic American civics.

And you’d be completely embarrassed of your stupid website if you had a basic understanding of paranoia disorder.

Many well known people have obsessive stalkers. Glenn Beck has GBR.

GlennBeckReview said:
“You would be ashamed to defend Beck if you had a basic high school understanding of basic American civics.”

Mr.Papshmer says:
“And you’d be completely embarrassed of your stupid website if you had a basic understanding of paranoia disorder.”

I very well do. See:
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/07/becks-paranoid-style-puts-him-in-long.html

“writer” says:
“Many well known people have obsessive stalkers. Glenn Beck has GBR.”

You do know that sitting in front of the television taking notes and then going up to the computer to do some fact finding and write a post doesn’t have anything to do with “stalking,” right?

Of course you don’t because you’re a god-damned idiot!

I don’t call Beck a f$%king a$$#ole because I don’t name-call. When I can show that Beck is a liar, I call him one. When I can show that Beck is an unprincipled hypocrite, I call him one.

“writer,” I just showed that you’re a god-damned idiot. Stalkers. “Writer” is living proof that the education system in this country is a dismal failure. “writer:” too stupid to be ashamed of his idiotic assertions.

Blair Maury said:
This may be my favorite Bloyer related thing on the Internet.
Saw this on an Amazon forum:
http://www.amazon.com/Woah-were-this-rocket-from/forum/Fx3SFS5L9IWXOTL/Tx2A17VGZ6A8200/2?_encoding=UTF8&asin=0226320545&cdSort=oldest&cdMessage=Mx2FA8562TA7V4B

Are you taking drugs? YOU make the dumbest posts. You see and read things that don’t exist? You take a statement that makes perfect sense and you see something else? You are strange. You must love to look like a fool.

GlennBeckReview said:
“Nope, it’s not hard hitting journalism. It is closer to gossip reporting. The source is negotiating with a large paper for sale of this juicy piece about Mr. Beck.”

juan says:
“Beck has threatened to sue about these rumors!

I hope he follows through like Sarah did with Gawker!”

Juan, when the story is published, it’s going to be backed up with witness accounts. It’s not a rumor; it’s an actual skeleton in his closet. I don’t think that it’s a bad thing, this skeleton, but some of his followers may have a different opinion about it.

gordonbloyershow says:
” You take a statement that makes perfect sense and you see something else?”

That’s exactly what Beck does! Here’s but one example:
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/07/show-when-glenn-beck-breitbarted.html

On Amazon, just as Maury pointed to, In reply to an earlier post on June 10, 2010 9:10 AM PDT
Gordon Bloyer says:

“One thing I can tell from YOUR post is that YOU are a slimy scumbag. You need help. How many times have you called the suicide hotline?”

Gordon, the blow hard with a show reacted: “You see and read things that don’t exist?”

You’re really funny Gordon. Why, if you were going to lie about what Maury was writing about, didn’t you change the URL.

Gordon, how come you never engage in civil exchanges with people you disagree with? My guess is that you’re an average IQ (at best), black-hearted, mean-spirited reactionary prick.

Until you prove me wrong about that, until you start demonstrating that you can be civil toward your opponents, Bloyer, I’m not going to revise that assessment.

How can anyone not love Glenn Beck? He’s consistent, he’ll criticize progressive republicans just as much as progressive democrats. Oh, and anyone who thinks progressive republicans don’t exist, they should google Theodore Roosevelt, that bastard hated the rich, fucking commie.

http://politicallyincorrectlibertarian.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/the-dream-act-insults-legal-immigrants/