Hey! A liberal comedian attacks a conservative and Mediate reposts it with no additional commentary.

In related news, the sun came up.

Let’s see Colbert, or any other progressive Democrat, defend the difference in the way black Conservatives are treated as opposed to black liberals.

Liberal Democrats constantly spew the mantra of supporting minorities, but we all know the truth.

Black Liberals are CELEBRATED.
Black Conservatives are SMEARED.

Is this the character of a Party you want to Vote for?

“Embattled” becasue he is a black conservative. Oh so typical.

In other news: Fox and Friends openly laughed at mainstream media this morning for IGNORING, SPIKING and HIDING the cross hair and Nazi signs at the Wisconsin rallies.

Tha’s right folks – the state run media has no problem with lefties targeting and threatening righties and claiming they are akin to Nazi’s, but if the right does it they are a bunch of ignorant bigots.

oh the double standard is just too damn funny, and really quite embarrassing.

I’m surprised mediaite hasn’t done a story on the signs, given the attention this board gave the signs at the tea party rallies.

Double standard much dan? Honestely.

TfT said:
“Embattled” becasue he is a black conservative. Oh so typical. In other news: Fox and Friends openly laughed at mainstream media this morning for IGNORING, SPIKING and HIDING the cross hair and Nazi signs at the Wisconsin rallies. Tha’s right folks – the state run media has no problem with lefties targeting and threatening righties and claiming they are akin to Nazi’s, but if the right does it they are a bunch of ignorant bigots. oh the double standard is just too damn funny, and really quite embarrassing. I’m surprised mediaite hasn’t done a story on the signs, given the attention this board gave the signs at the tea party rallies. Double standard much dan? Honestely.

Kudos, TfT,
KEEP EXPOSING IT!

The Message is getting out beyond the Democratic Media’s Cover-Up attempts.

Don’t mind the racists, Clarence. We know why they “really” hate you.

(D)ouble standard.
Like Obama’s hand picked SCOTUS cronies won’t jump like trained poodles when told to.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
Don’t mind the racists, Clarence. We know why they “really” hate you.

You get mad when people contend that hatred of Obama is about race rather than his policies. Isn’t the same true here? Can’t people dislike Thomas for his views? Are all his critics racists?

What if one of the liberal justices had attended a MoveOn.org convention and received payment for it? Are conservatives here honestly going to claim they wouldn’t be livid about that?

Paul, It was sarcasm. The whole reason of my post was because according to alot of libs, if you don’t like Obama’s policies, then you must be racist. Just playing their game.

Reading about how the mainstream media is celebrating the protesters in Wisconsin is making me laugh out loud; here we have cross hairs, nazi signs, etc., and the maintream media is endorsing, embracing, etc.

Too damn funny.

the libs hate Thomas because he is a black conservative, just look at all the horrific things that have been said about him by other blacks, the same way the outrageous attacks were condiucted on Herman Cain, also ignored by this board (except under the Hannity story). This board did not to a stand along story about the racist attacks against Cain, just like they won’t do a story about the outlandish signs in Wisconsin.

Makes Dan and his board look pretty foolish, imho. But hey, at least I don’t get banned when I make my obserations and request they provide just a little balance here.

Come on Dan, how about a serious article about the hate speech going on by the protesters in Wisconsin?

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
Paul, It was sarcasm. The whole reason of my post was because according to alot of libs, if you don’t like Obama’s policies, then you must be racist. Just playing their game.

What about my other question? How do you think conservatives would react if a liberal justice had been paid to attend a MoveOn.org convention?

TfT said:

the libs hate Thomas because he is a black conservative,

This is just as stupid and misguided as saying people are racist for not liking the president.

TfT said:
Reading about how the mainstream media is celebrating the protesters in Wisconsin is making me laugh out loud; here we have cross hairs, nazi signs, etc., and the maintream media is endorsing, embracing, etc.

Indeed. I was watching Matthews yesterday and he ran a clip that showed a sweep of the crowd and there was one lone sign visible above all the heads: “Heil Walker!” Strangely, though, Matthews felt no need to point it out or condemn it.

Paul, plenty of high profile DEMS have attended things like the nutroot convention. Talk to me when Thomas is hearing a case involving said group.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
Paul, plenty of high profile DEMS have attended things like the nutroot convention. Talk to me when Thomas is hearing a case involving said group.

High profile Dems? What? I am talking about members of the Supreme Court. Give me an honest answer. Would conservatives be upset if they discovered that a liberal justice was paid to attend a MoveOn.org convention? It’s a simple question.

This kind of blatant corruption is what destroys a society. How can he have any credibility after this? It’s a shame, a shame, big one.

It is not just the cablers Sean, its Dianne, Katie and Brian too. Don’t they realize how stupid and foolish they look? The citizenry has access to the truth and facts, and these liberal loony elite “news anchors” spike the truth and claim soliditary. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

I am still laughing that mediaite is ignoring it too. Makes them look really really silly, especially since they made such a big deal out of the signs at the tea party rallies and now spiking and ignoring worse signs at this rally makes them look like …. well….like they just donj’t care about the truth.

how sad for a media board to ignore the truth – I guess they want to continue playing on the same elite field at Katie Couric….bwahahahaha.

Paul, unless Thomas is doing something that directly interferes with him impartially hearing a case, I fail to see a problem. LIberals HATE Thomas and will grasp at whatever straw they can. Liberals hating Clarence Thomas isn’t exactly breaking news.

Earl Warren spoke to my University, who knew getting paid for it was wrong. Palin/West 2012!

NORBIT Jr. said:
Let’s see Colbert, or any other progressive Democrat, defend the difference in the way black Conservatives are treated as opposed to black liberals. Liberal Democrats constantly spew the mantra of supporting minorities, but we all know the truth. Black Liberals are CELEBRATED.Black Conservatives are SMEARED. Is this the character of a Party you want to Vote for?

nah, he committed a crime just like Charles rangel who was censured by the senate. He’s also been at the center of scandals before. Just ask Anita hill.

And ps Paul, if one of the liberal judges spoke to Moveon, I’d take it for what it is, a liberal speaking to those of like minds. That’s hardly news.

Not I’m out of town for the long weekend. You guys play nice.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
And ps Paul, if one of the liberal judges spoke to Moveon, I’d take it for what it is, a liberal speaking to those of like minds. That’s hardly news.

so basically the supreme court isn’t about justice it’s about politics to you. Good job.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
Paul, unless Thomas is doing something that directly interferes with him impartially hearing a case, I fail to see a problem. LIberals HATE Thomas and will grasp at whatever straw they can. Liberals hating Clarence Thomas isn’t exactly breaking news.

That’s sweet. Fortunately, the ethical standard is not your pitifully low one. The standard is the appearance of impropriety. Let me emphasize the: the appearance. To all except the most strident ideological zealot, Justice Thomas appears to be an ethical nightmare.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
Paul, unless Thomas is doing something that directly interferes with him impartially hearing a case, I fail to see a problem. LIberals HATE Thomas and will grasp at whatever straw they can. Liberals hating Clarence Thomas isn’t exactly breaking news.

You are so full of it. You and other conservatives would have a conniption fit if GInsberg spoke to the much-hated MoveOn.org and got paid for it. You are either lying or in total denial.

Liberal Tormentor (formerly Seeing 2012 From My Window) said:
Paul, plenty of high profile DEMS have attended things like the nutroot convention. Talk to me when Thomas is hearing a case involving said group.

That’s not the issue. The standards for judges, justices and the entire judiciary are different. The standard is higher. Thankfully. Don’t keeping trying to make a chowder of papayas and toner cartridges. It is neither tasty nor healthy.

Also, if a liberal justice’s spouse was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for working with a liberal activist group, and said income was not reported, conservatives would go ballistic.

paulmdoro said:
You are so full of it. You and other conservatives would have a conniption fit if GInsberg spoke to the much-hated MoveOn.org and got paid for it. You are either lying or in total denial.

I have to say, Paul, that is uncharacteristic of you. You’re comment is absolutely true, but it is surprising.

The Real Royal King said:
I have to say, Paul, that is uncharacteristic of you. You’re comment is absolutely true, but it is surprising.

I can’t stand the blatant hypocrisy and lies.

NORBIT Jr. said:
Let’s see Colbert, or any other progressive Democrat, defend the difference in the way black Conservatives are treated as opposed to black liberals.

Liberal Democrats constantly spew the mantra of supporting minorities, but we all know the truth.

Black Liberals are CELEBRATED.
Black Conservatives are SMEARED.

Is this the character of a Party you want to Vote for?

Where I come from a “smear” means lying about someone to sully their reputation. Clarence Thomas DID neglect to report his wife’s income and he DID attend a Republican fundraiser. I don’t think either of those actions should be celebrated. In fact, combined with his failure to recuse himself from cases where there was a direct conflict of interest with his wife’s activities. I think they’re grounds for his impeachment.

paulmdoro said:
Also, if a liberal justice’s spouse was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for working with a liberal activist group, and said income was not reported, conservatives would go ballistic.

I’d hate for anyone to assume that all African judges are the ethical nightmares Justice Thomas and his wife are clearly exceptions. But, this isn’t any surprise. From the moment his confirmation hearings began, it was clear that he brought excessive baggage on-board.

What I do find interesting is that Justice Thomas was a recipient of unparalleled affirmative action largesse, yet he vigorously opposes it for anyone else. And in his opposition, he still feels that he and he alone is entitle to special treatment in all things.

Don’t keeping trying to make a chowder of papayas and toner cartridges. It is neither tasty nor healthy.

by phony name jacker

Speaking from years of experience? How ’bout we make you our in house expert on the subject from now on? Let it be written. ;)

How can you people be that f-cking stupid? This man broke the law. Plain and simple.
If you want proof that American Democracy is an illusion. Look no further than Mr. Thomas.

A man without a Country said:
How can you people be that f-cking stupid? This man broke the law. Plain and simple.
If you want proof that American Democracy is an illusion. Look no further than Mr. Thomas.

How do you feel about chuck rangel?

Olby Sucks said:
How do you feel about chuck rangel?

Codfish and spandex. Congressman and Supreme Court Justice. Vastly different ethical standards and consequences. One has paid the consequences. One has not.

Cat litter and attache cases. Jeff Merrill and thinking.

Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee mean anything to you, Mrs. Philby?

Congressman and Supreme Court Justice. Vastly different ethical standards

by phony name jacker

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Here’s the proof.

Olby Sucks said:
Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee mean anything to you, Mrs. Philby?

One person was punished for wrongdoing one has not been punished. Pretty simple.

Ben Pratt said:
One person was punished for wrongdoing one has not been punished. Pretty simple.

So, you have no problem with Mrs.Philby’s contention that public officials be held to different ethical standards based on their level of power? Strange.

Why doesn’t mediaite do a story on this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71gsnLfsbbM

They did several stories about Hitler signs at tea parties (Which were brought by La’Rouche Democrats)

Dronetek said:
Why doesn’t mediaite do a story on this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71gsnLfsbbM

They did several stories about Hitler signs at tea parties (Which were brought by La’Rouche Democrats)

Submit a story idea to them, or write one yourself.

Dronetek said:
Why doesn’t mediaite do a story on this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71gsnLfsbbM

They did several stories about Hitler signs at tea parties (Which were brought by La’Rouche Democrats)

Double standards.

Olby Sucks said:
Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee mean anything to you, Mrs. Philby?

Indeed it does. It means he’s not a judge.

And, he has also been subjected to the appropriate misconduct findings and sanctions which the House can impose.

Thomas, however, had been subjected to nothing.

You’re not very bright, are you?

Olby Sucks said:
So, you have no problem with Mrs.Philby’s contention that public officials be held to different ethical standards based on their level of power? Strange.

Considering the judges aren’t supposed to be politicians so yes they are held at a different ethical standard. They’re supposed to be arbiters of law not a candidate looking for campaign contributions.

This is obviously racially motivated.

The Real Royal King said:
Vastly different ethical standards and consequences. One has paid the consequences. One has not.

Rangel has paid the consequences? How?

And yes, they are different jobs. Rangel writes the laws, Thomas reviews them.

Pablo said:
Rangel has paid the consequences? How?

And yes, they are different jobs. Rangel writes the laws, Thomas reviews them.

He is required to report her income though, correct? And he did not for years?

paulmdoro said:
What if one of the liberal justices had attended a MoveOn.org convention and received payment for it? Are conservatives here honestly going to claim they wouldn’t be livid about that?

They’re allowed to do speaking engagements. While I wouldn’t be thrilled about it, there’s really no complaint to make about it. Assuming reasonable fees (which must be reported if paid) it does not create a conflict of interest.

Pablo said:
They’re allowed to do speaking engagements. While I wouldn’t be thrilled about it, there’s really no complaint to make about it. Assuming reasonable fees (which must be reported if paid) it does not create a conflict of interest.

I’m not saying they are not allowed to. I am saying that if a liberal justice received money to speak at an event organized by George Soros, many conservatives would be outraged.

paulmdoro said:
He is required to report her income though, correct? And he did not for years?

No. And John Kerry is not required to report Theresa Heinz’ income. And John McCain is not required to report Cindy McCain’s income. Ginny is not Clarence, Clarence is not Ginny. She’s allowed to have her own life.

Pablo said:
No. And John Kerry is not required to report Theresa Heinz’ income. And John McCain is not required to report Cindy McCain’s income. Ginny is not Clarence, Clarence is not Ginny. She’s allowed to have her own life.

Are you sure?

“Justice Clarence Thomas failed for more than a decade to disclose his wife’s income, as required by law.”

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/clarence-thomas-failed-to-report-wifes-income/

Does anyone really think it was some sort of secret that Ginny Thomas was working for Heritage? It wasn’t.

paulmdoro said:
I’m not saying they are not allowed to. I am saying that if a liberal justice received money to speak at an event organized by George Soros, many conservatives would be outraged.

Tonight on Glenn Beck……

Glenn: http://www.gifbin.com/982670

Pablo said:
Does anyone really think it was some sort of secret that Ginny Thomas was working for Heritage? It wasn’t.

I don’t think anyone thinks that is a secret, but he was in fact required to report her income and has amended 13 years of disclosure reports.

“Like all federal judges, Thomas must file annual disclosure reports on his personal finances, but he had omitted details of his wife’s earnings in what he wrote was a “misunderstanding of the filing instructions.” He also had checked a box marking no spousal income.”

paulmdoro said:
Are you sure?

“Justice Clarence Thomas failed for more than a decade to disclose his wife’s income, as required by law.”

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/clarence-thomas-failed-to-report-wifes-income/

Common Cause is not the arbiter of law. The do seem to have a certain bent though, don’t they? I can’t believe they’ve got a fake news video from Comedy Central on their homepage. A very sober and serious organization, that.

Pablo said:
Common Cause is not the arbiter of law. The do seem to have a certain bent though, don’t they? I can’t believe they’ve got a fake news video from Comedy Central on their homepage. A very sober and serious organization, that.

So why did he amend 13 years of disclosure reports and say it was a misunderstanding? He checked no when asked if his wife had any income. That was not true.

Pablo said:
Rangel has paid the consequences? How?

And yes, they are different jobs. Rangel writes the laws, Thomas reviews them.

Bingo. Chuck “makes law.” Yet, the far left loons think he should be held to a lower standard for some strange reason.

Pablo said:
Rangel has paid the consequences? How? And yes, they are different jobs. Rangel writes the laws, Thomas reviews them.

he got censured that’s how. Pretty simple. Rangel is elected to an office, Thomas is to be an arbiter of the law not trying to gain political points.

Olby Sucks said:
Bingo. Chuck “makes law.” Yet, the far left loons think he should be held to a lower standard for some strange reason.

No we just think Thomas should be acting like a judge instead of a politician.

Pablo said:
Common Cause is not the arbiter of law. The do seem to have a certain bent though, don’t they? I can’t believe they’ve got a fake news video from Comedy Central on their homepage. A very sober and serious organization, that.

so you’re suggesting the information is falsified? then why did Thomas admit to doing it in the first place?

I’d be satisfied if Rangel , Geithner and Thomas all lost their jobs for their failure in filing accurate taxes.

NORBIT Jr. said:
Black Liberals are CELEBRATED.
Black Conservatives are SMEARED.

Is this the character of a Party you want to Vote for?

Did Thomas do something wrong or not? If the facts are correct it’;s hardly a smear is it?

In retrospect, having Wesley Snipes fill out their taxes was a mistake.

writer said:
In retrospect, having Wesley Snipes fill out their taxes was a mistake.

LOL!!! and he had help from Willie Nelson.

Everything would be OK if each elected rep had to wear a NASCAR uniform showing all his/her sponsors.

huntingtonboy said:
Everything would be OK if each elected rep had to wear a NASCAR uniform showing all his/her sponsors.

I’ve heard that before and it’s pretty funny.

The problem is a lot of the money is channeled through political action committees with innocuous sounding names.

I really think ONLY private citizens should be allowed to donate.

Thomas lied. Period. He USED to report his wife’s income, then stopped. That makes his “misunderstanding” defense a lie. He didn’t report ANY income for his wife, when everyone in DC knew she was working for Heritage. That makes him a fool. He has crossed the line of judicial ethics. He has become a politician. If that is what he wants to do, he should follow the example of Abe Fortas and Arthur Goldberg and resign from the Supreme Court.

Thomas is the perfect example of why this country will slowly but surely continue to move to the left. He is probably one of the worst Justices ever. His appointment was an enormous insult not just to Black Americans but to anyone seriously interested in seeing American have an honest, effective Supreme Court. I suspect his days are numbered. It would be great if some progressive African Amreicans began a movement to have him removed from the bench and replaced with anyone of hundreds of Black jurists who are infinitely better qualified than this creep.