The Evolution Of The Fox News News Response To The White House
A fresh round of attacks by White House officials aimed at Fox News took place last weekend, and with it came another batch of people writing how this is not a winning strategy – and over the line.
The Fox News official response to all this has evolved over the past couple weeks, and now serves in an interesting dual role.
The White House should expect a strong fight from the opinion hosts on Fox News, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, who all made the White House battle the main story on their programs last night. But the White House hasn’t just been attacking these outspoken hosts – they’re cutting to the news core, downplaying FNC as a news organization as well.
The response has changed over time in statements, and yesterday FNC debuted a splashy new ad touting the news chops (on the next page). But let’s take a look at the statements first.
Fox News’ Senior Vice President for News Michael Clemente has been the main representative for the news department for this. His first response, to Time magazine early this month, was very diplomatic. “The fact that our numbers are up 30 plus in the news arena on basic cable I’d like to think is a sign that we are just putting what we believe to be the facts out on the table…In terms of the relationship, I think we are doing our job. And they [the White House] are doing their job,” he said.
Next, Clemente was driving home the point that news and opinion are separate at FNC after a direct attack from Anita Dunn: “An increasing number of viewers are relying on Fox News for both news and opinion. And the average news consumer can certainly distinguish between the A section of a newspaper and the editorial page, which is what our programming represents.”
To the New York Times, after new attacks from Dunn, we started seeing a shift last week. “Instead of governing, the White House continues to be in campaign mode, and Fox News is the target of their attack mentality,” said Clemente. “Perhaps the energy would be better spent on the critical issues that voters are worried about.”
And finally, the most recent statement, put out in response to what Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod said on the Sunday shows: “Surprisingly, the White House continues to declare war on a news organization instead of focusing on the critical issues that Americans are concerned about like jobs, health care and two wars. The door remains open and we welcome a discussion about the facts behind the issues.”
This is a major shift from Clemente’s first statements. Clemente’s use of the word “instead” implies a judgment being made about the White House – and their lack of focus on “critical issues” like “jobs, health care and two wars.” No matter how you parse the words, this clearly shows the head of FNC’s news division making an opinionated statement about the Obama administration. Are we to believe that the Fox News official news division position is that the White House is focusing on Fox News while abandoning these other issues? That’s not something FNC wants to get into – it’s a point that is better suited for their opinion hosts.
The FNC news division position was only made more clear by a new, highly-produced ad that debuted yesterday, with the tagline “Hard News. Real Reporting.” It shows FNC reporters in war zones, natural disasters and more, and anchors touting the “fair and balanced” nature of the network. The point is clear – we do do news. And for anyone who is even a casual viewer of Fox News knows, this is 100% accurate. And that’s why the White House attacks seem so pointless – FNC does have a news department that covers real news. And they have people like Beck and Hannity that hammer the White House. Do you get a tougher interview if you’re a Democrat than if you’re a Republican during daytime hours? Probably. But you could make that argument the other way with MSNBC, where David Shuster, who fills in on Countdown, is seen as an “anchor.” It’s a continuous losing fight for the White House.
>>> NEXT PAGE: The new promo, and the latest Fox News ‘news’ report on the fight.
Pages: 1 2
4 comments
m says: >No matter how you parse the words, this clearly shows the head of FNC’s news division making an opinionated statement about the Obama administration
I agree. When I first read that statement, it sounded suspiciously similar to the text-book retorts that political opponents make against each other. Quite ironic.
> Do you get a tougher interview if you’re a Democrat than if you’re a Republican during daytime hours? Probably. But you could make that argument the other way with MSNBC, where David Shuster, who fills in on Countdown, is seen as an “anchor.”
Agreed. MSNBC falls into the same traps that Fox News does – no doubt about that. But the main difference here though is that MSNBC hasn’t really claimed that it’s an impartial network. I’d say it’s quite the opposite: they actually ran promos declaring themselves the “Power of Change”, with Matthews admitting on inauguration day saying MSNBC “Opened its heart to change” and that it’s the “Network of 21st century”; the same day they held live streams of MSNBC’s inauguration coverage into movie theaters, handing out bags of swag with Obama’s face on it along with MSNBC anchors!
I mean, as far as I know Phil Griffin hasn’t made any statements claiming there’s a clear separation between daytime and primetime when it comes to opinionated hosts on the channel, instead saying he wanted strong personalities (a prime example of this would be former host Carlos Watson, and right now to a certain extent probably Dylan Ratigan). Regardless of what Fox News executives say about the impartiality of their daytime programming, it’s hard to take them serious when it wasn’t that long ago Happening Now’s Jon Scott read bullet points directly off of a Republican press release including the typos!
Fox News still insists that it is impartial, thanks to the backing of their substantial news division. But if I am not mistaken, it was not until recently that they’ve actually begun to admit any form of bias at all – specifically the prime time programming. Prior to cutting Colmes’s umbilical and adding Beck last year, they still claimed to be fair and balanced on all programming, even when that wasn’t the case either. All and all, I’d say the fact that Fox News now admits bias at all (even when they claim it is limited) is a concession that they just hadn’t made in the past.
DWHarper says: The author here has done NO WORK in this article, just regurgitating statements by both sides of the issue. This, of course, is the “fair and balanced” approach to journalism. What happens to journalism when one of the sides of the issue is WRONG? Does a good journalist still give the wrong side even when known to be wrong and doesn’t point that out? This is just the case with the author and the MSM in general. Media Matters has a litany of examples where Fox News editorializes with its news division picking up on their opinion makers. So, Fox News is wrong about a division between news and opinion on its network. Mr. Krakauer is just as quilty as Fox News in giving voice to both sides when that is not the whole story.
Sunnyr says: The people in this country are thirsty for REAL, UNBIASED NEWS and Fox is the ONLY station who delivers! Keep up the good work, Fox News Channel. You audience is growing on a daily basis. We depend on you for fair and balanced news and great OPINION programs as well. We are smart enough to separate the wheat from the chafe but evidently the idiots in the White House are not.
ChrisNH says: Axelrod, Rahm, and Anita are all so incensed by Fox that they failed to take a more measured tone against Fox. Instead of singling out the 5pm and 9pm segments with which they take issue, they painted with a broad brush…which only fanned the flames more. It is a bell they cannot un-ring. And in a paradox, the ‘other’ media outlets look like suck-ups to Obama after Anita stupidly declared success in her role to ‘control’ them. Beck’s Boston Terrier ‘PRESS’ (complete with pink collar) was a fabulous prop to describe what’s going on. If the rest of the media doesn’t mind being characterized that way, the lambasting of them shall continue.
Job hunting?
Use our proprietary jobs tool to access the largest pool of jobs aggregated from around the country.
Stephen Colbert: ‘Sarah Palin is a F***king Retard’
The usually reliable Keith Olbermann's inability to nail Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin on Limbaugh's use of the term "retard" has been pretty frustrating. Sure, he has posited Palin as a hypocrite, but several times he has repeated Rush's and Palin's dueling assertions that he was "quoting" Rahm Emanuel, or that he was being "satirical," without really challenging it. Luckily, Stephen Colbert actually knows what the word "satire" means, and deployed a pile of it on Palin and Rush last night.
Keith Olbermann, Jon Stewart Fail to Eviscerate Sarah Palin
Hyperbole must be over. How else does one explain the extremely disappointing bits that Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann did on Sarah Palin last night? Handed (thank you, I'm here all week) 3 days of Palin material that rivaled anything George W. Bush ever gave them, Olbermann could barely manage a molecule of spittle, let alone a lather, and Stewart deployed his seldom-used Nerf™ jokes.
More TV headlines:
»President Obama’s Nobel Prize Money? It’s Still Waiting For Him To Claim »6
»Enraged, Rachel Maddow Explains ‘Racist History’ Tea Party Is Embracing »36
»Superbowl MVP Drew Brees on Letterman (with Baby Brees Backstage!)
»Welcome, @CraigyFerg! Craig Ferguson Joins Twitter »4
»Jay Leno Explains The Letterman Promo: “A Good Joke Is A Good Joke” »6
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | 
RSS
