Ryan Lizza Turned Olivia Nuzzi Breakup Series Into Revenge Porn Disguised as Journalism

X/@Olivianuzzi

Ryan Lizza released Part IV of his Substack saga on December 1, the night before Olivia Nuzzi’s American Canto lands. The timing said everything. He wasn’t adding a chapter; he was establishing the definitive version before hers could compete. And by the fourth installment, it was clear this wasn’t spontaneous grief processing — it was a sustained, serialized campaign designed to maximize impact and shape the public interpretation of a private collapse.

What he published is not journalism. It is an assertion of narrative power, the kind a veteran political reporter can summon automatically, even when the battlefield is his own life. The story itself is familiar by now: he discovered his fiancée’s involvement with Robert Kennedy Jr., collected the emotional wreckage, and assembled a multipart account from texts, memories, and confessions — all available for a tidy subscription fee.

The telling is the story. Lizza brought the entire architecture of political reporting to the ruins of his engagement — timelines, evidence files, reconstructed conversations, sourced records arranged for maximum persuasive effect. Private exchanges become exhibits; emotional disclosures take on the weight of deposition testimony. His breakup is laid out like a public scandal, complete with receipts and an implicit request for judgment.

This reflects a worldview shaped by decades inside a system where controlling the narrative is a form of power. That instinct now governs his own story. These installments read less like recollection than like an effort to fix the official record before Nuzzi’s version arrives. He is using the same methods he once applied to campaigns to control his place in a story where he is both narrator and subject.

The people inside his story do not get equal footing. RFK Jr. appears only through Nuzzi’s private descriptions — his relationships, sexual preferences,  alleged drug use, medical treatments — intimate details he believed were confidential, now deployed to reinforce Lizza’s position.

This is textbook revenge-porn mechanics applied to political journalism: intimate information weaponized through publication, justified because the target is public. Nuzzi appears only in fragments he selects. And the young assistant who secretly recorded Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago becomes a character in a story she did not choose, her actual life subsumed by her utility to his narrative timeline.

The class dimension is impossible to miss. Two elite political journalists have turned the collapse of their relationship into serialized content at the exact moment the rest of the profession is collapsing. Newsrooms are dissolving; reporters are losing jobs. Meanwhile, they can monetize their private catastrophe and trust that the audience will follow. I subscribed and read every word, and felt worse for having done it.

In my earlier writing about Nuzzi, I said her unapologetic reentry — the self-mythology, the Lana Del Rey cosplay, the absence of contrition — was distasteful. But Nuzzi’s violations weren’t merely aesthetic. She blurred ethical boundaries with RFK Jr. while reporting on him, crossed lines she later tried to recast as reasonable, and behaved as if access exempted her from consequences.

Lizza wasn’t a casualty of that worldview — he shared it. They operated with the same comfort around blurred lines, the same faith in their proximity to power, the same willingness to use intimacy for strategic ends. They harmed each other and harmed the profession. They deserved each other — which makes the next question unavoidable.

The personal story is less important than what it enables. What does it mean when a political reporter treats his own heartbreak as a story deserving the same apparatus once reserved for institutions, elected officials, and people in great power?

The answer is misrecognition. Lizza didn’t forget the scale of the tools he was using; he misjudged the stakes. The reflexes — organize, interpret, publish, shape the frame — persisted even where the subject had no public consequence. The result looks like journalism but serves as something else: a personal vendetta reconstructed with investigative scaffolding and released in strategic installments. He may be writing from genuine hurt, but hurt does not justify publication — and no one with editorial authority stopped him from making that mistake.

If journalism has a corrective here, it requires more than regret. It requires friction. Readers need sharper skepticism when narrative authority is used to settle private accounts. Editors — even in an era designed to route around them — remain necessary guardrails. And institutions need the will to say that not every personal disaster becomes news simply because a journalist has the tools to package it that way. Substack removes those checks by design, since Lizza co-founded his Telos.news, and requires no editorial approval or institutional scrutiny to publish any of this.

The template now exists. Every reporter with a grievance, a contact list, and a subscription button can see what Lizza demonstrated: personal catastrophe can be converted into professional capital if the narrative skills are sharp and the platform is permissive. The only remaining check is whether the profession still believes any boundaries are worth keeping — and whether editors, institutions, or the platforms making money off this work will ever do anything besides watch the subscriptions roll in.

This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.