1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Is The Media Helping MTV Market Skins By Reporting On “Child Porn” Story?

video
» 21 comments

There are many ways you could have heard about the TV show Skins? You could be from England where the show originally became (and still is) a huge sensation. You could watch MTV where a new remake just premiered. You could be a New York subway passenger and, therefore, someone who has spent the past month getting leered at by the half-naked cast of said remake in thousands of ads. Or perhaps you read the New York Times this morning and learned that the show is SO DAMN RACY that MTV execs worried that they’d be arrested for child porn! Uh huh. Sure.

The New York Times article has some interesting information about the making of the new MTV series which debuted last week. However, the only tidbit that people are going to take away is the child porn story right at the top. And I’m sure that’s exactly what MTV wanted.

Here’s how it’s described:

“In recent days, executives at the cable channel became concerned that some scenes from the provocative new show ‘Skins’ may violate federal child pornography statutes.

The executives ordered the producers to make changes to tone down some of the most explicit content.

They are particularly concerned about the third episode of the series, which is to be broadcast Jan. 31. In an early version, a naked 17-year-old actor is shown from behind as he runs down a street. The actor, Jesse Carere, plays Chris, a high school student whose erection — assisted by erectile dysfunction pills — is a punch line throughout the episode.

The planned changes indicate that MTV, which has been pushing the envelope for decades, may be concerned that it pushed too far this time.”

According to the article, some MTV executive watched a cut of the show and suddenly freaked out because they were afraid that they had broken child pornography laws. They rushed to have the episode in question edited. And then…just for kicks I suppose…they decided to call up The New York Times to have them report on the whole thing. If you believe that, well, you’re probably pretty naive (no offense!). While I’m sure there’s a possibility that MTV edited a scene from the show after standards and practices got a look at it, I have pretty high doubts anyone was legitimately worried about getting hauled off to jail. No, this seems like nothing but a rumor designed to get a new show some press.

But what does that mean? Basically it means that MTV is now marketing their show with the promise of potential child pornography and the media is helping them. Not only did The New York Times cover this “story” (on the front page!), but a bunch of other media outlets picked it up. Morning Joe did a whole segment this morning that began with Joe Scarborough asking “Why should I be afraid of Skins?” You know there were some good high fives all around the MTV offices when that sentence got uttered.

Shows like Skins have always gotten by on their controversy and the promise of scandalous content. A few years ago, the show Gossip Girl used a brilliant ad campaign that quoted negative and outraged reviews from the likes of the Parents Television Council. However, actually going out and saying the phrase “child pornography” is just so damned cynical. MTV is basically betting that they will get more viewers if people think there are actual naked 15 year olds on this show. They may be right but, God, is it a creepy way to run your business.

So, no, Skins is not child pornography. In fact, it’s a neutered version of the original British show (which, by the way, was actually pretty darn good for two seasons) since MTV isn’t able to feature profanity or nudity.* People are going to say MTV should be ashamed and they certainly should. Not for airing an edgy show, but for trying to profit off the demand for child porn. And anyone who reports this nonsense should feel ashamed for believing it.

The New York Times Article can be found here. Below is the Morning Joe segment:

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • skyfet

    I don’t know if the mainstream media sometimes play stupid to their audience or are just stupid. By giving extensive coverage to this programme, they are simply marketing it for MTV to a larger audience free of charge. What the hell? do they have dummies running this outlets. You should get paid for your service (promoting nudity and the other vice).

  • swasoose

    Isn’t it ironic how America claims to be the beacon of free speach……..yeah! Only when it suits them. British humour is far too enigmatic for Americans.

  • skyfet

    swasoose said:
    Isn’t it ironic how America claims to be the beacon of free speach……..yeah! Only when it suits them. British humour is far too enigmatic for Americans.

    This isn’t a comedy program. What the hell are you talking about?

  • bealzebubba

    This show seems like a broadcast re-imagining of the movie Kids…same kind style.

    I think the only good thing MTV has shown in it’s post-music era has been 16 and Pregnant…showing the hardships of being with child when you’re UNEMPLOYED, IN SCHOOL and the sperm donor is UNINTERESTED. Kept my kid from being careless.

  • naoma

    This was the most boring piece of garbage I’ve ever seen. Totally stupid.

  • jo hoochie

    And they wonder why teens are sleeping together, getting pregnant when shows like this, movies and commericals are always showing teens and adults jumping in bed togehter every chance they get. Going from one person then another. As the old saying goes monkey see monkey do. I agree with bealzebubba. The MTV show 16 and pregnant shows the hardship a teen will go thru having sex and a baby so young, missing out on what is suppose to be their happy years. I hope this show 16 and pregnant will make them think before they give their heart and soul to another person.

  • notsofast

    swasoose said:
    Isn’t it ironic how America claims to be the beacon of free speach……..yeah! Only when it suits them. British humour is far too enigmatic for Americans.

    No, it isn’t ironic. America is a beacon of free speech- that doesn’t mean that a TV station has to provide you a platform to express it.

    BTW, it is a sad reflection on American TV that it just rips off a number of British shows.

    They did it with All in the Family, Hotel Baltimore, Three’s Company, American Idol, Who Wants to be a Millionaire,etc.

    Come on guys, give us something original.

  • paulmdoro

    I believe Showtime’s newest shows, Shameless and Episodes, are also remakes of British shows.

  • redleaf

    And it’s working.
    You realize we’re on mediaite, a site that is (supposedly) populated by older, more intelligent people…and we’re talking about it, too.
    So there you go. It’s now part of the national conversation in all ages.

  • notsofast

    paulmdoro said:
    I believe Showtime’s newest shows, Shameless and Episodes, are also remakes of British shows.

    Hard to believe “Sanford & Son” was too.

  • http://pouredwithpleasure.com obillo

    Never heard of it until MEDIAITE started blabbing . . .

  • greg454
  • Contessa

    MTV is a sewer.

  • Paula

    MTV is owned by Viacom. How many Viacom executive’s children are allowed to watch it?

  • btimsah

    Haha, child porn. Please. Maybe we should have another war. A war on child porn. We don’t have enough wars.

  • greg454

    I’d rather have a war on child porn than a war against obesity, tobacco, or any of the other personal choices.

    http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

  • WCinWI

    Hannity just talked about Mediaite in the Media Mash.

    Clearly this means that TC and everyone else on the site will write friendlier posts on Hannity.

  • bealzebubba

    I’ve not watched this show…not even the British version but in all honesty, it reminds me of this movie from back in 1995 called “Kids”. Same premise….basically, one of those shows that if parents watched, they’d freak out at the thought that their own kid is acting that way.

    notsofast said:
    BTW, it is a sad reflection on American TV that it just rips off a number of British shows.

    We may not agree on much, but I’m on your level with that one. That and Hollywood’s continuous effort at remaking every good movie that’s already been done.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joe-Bua/1007153239 Joe Bua

    Someday we will all be shocked and stunned when we find out that media companies have been paying these religious watchdogs to protest their shows. Well, you’ll be shocked and stunned, I’ll just shake my head and move on.

    The only thing making this the hottest buzz show on the air right now is the Parents TV Council, they are doing an excellent marketing job for Viacom.

    I watched the pilot, it was kinda lightweight compared to the UK version on E4, which felt more raw and emotional. These kids all seem so detached. Considering the both casts are stocked with unknowns I can only presume we’re raising a generation of kids that can’t connect.

    That’s the sad story of Skins, not the sexytime problems of a bunch of religious zealots that masquerade as a parents’ advocacy group.

  • omega919

    I watched about 5 minutes of this, and the biggest problem with this show (the US version, at least) is that it seems to be acted out by a random high-school drama class. Just the worst acting I think I’ve ever seen on a national TV show.

  • Sue

    What? What? The media helping MTV? Wow…..there is simply nothing new under the Sun. After all, this is the most recent disgusting thing on MTV and coming from the U.K….you can see why they’re falling apart and helping us fall apart too. I bet the pedophiles love this and dirty old men too.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram