Tipping Point? White House Press Pool Stands Up For Fox News
Look what Jake Tapper started. When ABC’s White House correspondent Tapper questioned press secretary Robert Gibbs over the administration’s tactic of attacking Fox News, Gibbs avoided much of an answer.
But yesterday’s round-robin pool interviews of new executive pay czar Kenneth Feinberg saw the White House trying to ostracize Fox News again – and their partners in the pool taking a stand, again.
James Rosen reported on the incident during FNC’s Special Report last night, saying the White House pool, which is a five-network rotation “that for decades has shared the cost and duties of daily coverage of the presidency, to which Fox News has belonged since 1997,” was told the pay czar would be available for round-robin interviews, but FNC would not be included. “The Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV news networks [ABC, CBS, CNN, FNC and NBC] consulted and decided that none of them would interview Feinberg unless Fox was included, and the administration relented,” said Rosen.
Yes – instead of five-minute interviews with the four networks, they agreed to two-minute interviews with the five networks, plus Bloomberg. This was the first true test for the White House press pool as the other networks start feeling the affect of the FNC vs. WH battle – and they very clearly came down on the side of their fellow media.
“I think it’s outrageous that the White House tried that,” said Baltimore Sun TV critic David Zurawik in the report. “And I’m really cheered that the other networks said ‘no’.”
On Special Report, Fred Barnes continued a line of comment that was discussed by Anderson Cooper earlier this week. “One adjective comes up and when this adjective comes up you know you’re in trouble and it’s ‘Nixonian.’”
Not everyone on the panel agreed. NPR’s Mara Liasson said, “Access is not the same thing as free speech – the White House is not duty bound by the First Amendment to give everybody the same interview.”
The New York Times has a lengthy piece on the entire White House vs. Fox News feud, including a part about the pay czar decision yesterday. They also have the latest from Fox News’ SVP of news and editorial programming Michael Clemente:
[Clemente] said the White House was conflating the network’s commentary with its news coverage. That, Mr. Clemente said, “would be like Fox News blaming the White House senior staff for the Washington Redskins’ losing record.”
“I think we’re doing the job we’re supposed to be doing,” he said, “and we do it as well as anyone.”
This story has come to an end for the week – but if administration officials are back out on the Sunday shows bashing the merits of an entire news organization, expect this to not only continue, but escalate.
Here’s the Rosen report, and the Special Report panel discussing the pool response (via Johnny Dollar):
—–
» Follow Steve Krakauer on Twitter
22 comments
Good for the other networks! That was the right move.
It reminds me of the post last week about Beck and the *First they came for the Jews* comment. I think that idea resonated with the other networks…especially as other networks start to lose the morning after glow. They will want to criticize the WH, and can’t worry that they will become the next target. They were right to take a stand against this type of action.
StewartIII says: ‘A Very Serious Constitutional Violation’
http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/blog/rjo277998087.html
TfT says: Glad to see this happen. I guess the WH has finally over stepped its bounds. Not only are they banding together because they see this action as overreach, but they see the writing on the wall. If they can do it to FNC they can do it to anyone. And if this President sets this as a precedent, other President’s can do same, and more.
Now, lets see if they start doing some real reporting to rid themselves of the “Approved by the WH” tag line they have brought upon themselves.
Grammie says: One defense of the current WH making the rounds was that Nixon not only went public like BHO but unlike BHO had carried his vendetta to underhanded secret attacks.
Considering the extreme lengths this WH is going to attack FNC I can’t help but wonder what are they doing under the radar. The more I see of BHO and his Chicago gang the more my belief is that they are capable and willing to do most anything to advance their political agenda.
ChrisNH says: At some point (and it may already have started) the ’sympathetic-to-Obama’ media will internalize this amongst themselves. “We really look kind of stupid and ‘neutered’ by ‘obeying’ what the President wants us to supposedly do.” Kind of like the hen-pecked husband who finally decides to take a stand.
m says: What liberal media?
m says: George W. Bush didn’t do a single interview with the New York Times during his eight years of Presidency, btw. Freezing out media you don’t like is a part of the game of politics.
m says:
October 23, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Once again, Obama is compared to Bush. I thought Obama was change, but liberals just keep pointing out how alike Obama and Bush are.
Jim R says: The comparisons to the Bush Administration are to point out the blatant hypocricy of the right in applauding when Nixon and/or Bush/Rove did it to media that refused to catapult the propaganda and reported the facts.
Calling out Fox for their disgusting promotion of extremist right wing propaganda is hardly comparable to exposing Republican torture, spying, and dismantling of the Constitution (all cheered by Fox).
ImNotBlue says: m says:
October 23, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Of course, an interview is different than not allowing a media outlet or reporter in a press briefing… I’m sure even you can see that.
Jim R says:
October 23, 2009 at 12:42 pm
The comparisons to the Bush Administration are to point out the blatant hypocrisy of the right in applauding…
And yet, inherently while you’re “pointing out” the hypocrisy YOU see, you’re committing your own. If you’re cheering on the Obama Admin for boycotting FOX, while boo-ing the Bush Admin… you’re EQUALLY hypocritical! Get it.
Grammie says: “m says:
October 23, 2009 at 12:22 pm
George W. Bush didn’t do a single interview with the New York Times during his eight years of Presidency, btw. Freezing out media you don’t like is a part of the game of politics.”
For the current situation between BHO and Fox to be comparable to GWB never granting an interview to the NYT it would have had to also mean that NO GWB Admin officials ever granted or talked to the NYT either. We know that that was not the case.
We had an early example of this when three papers had their correspondants ejected from the Obama campaign because their editors endorsed McCain. We now have the “Whiner in Chief”.
Jim R says: I’m not equally hypocritical because I concur with the underlying assumption that Fox isn’t a news organization, but a political player.
Besides, they’re not being boycotted by anyone, they’ll just be treated like any other political opponent.
At least until their producers stop cheerleading “protestors” for their own “straight news” coverage, and slander from their “opinion” shows quits showing up in their “news” broadcasts.
If Rupert Murdoch doesn’t like the Fourth Estate concept as espoused by Jefferson, he can go back to playing politics in the U.K. and Australia.
straitshooter says: Jim, you are the very embodiment of hypocrisy, and you seem to have a functioning brain, so I’m sure you realize it, you are just loathe to admit it. If I were advising Bush, I would tell him to never give the Times an interview. If I were advising Obama, I would tell him never to give Fox an interview. HOWEVER…when the Bush administration scolded the times, it was in reference to a specific story. The Obama people have yet to point out a story that supports their case against Fox. They just don’t like Fox.
I can rise above such pettiness, and I’ll prove it here. I like you Jim. Have a nice weekend.
Jim R says: You do the same, straitshooter.
Where was the boycott when Bush henpicked who he would have secret meetings with? I can dig up the articles if you really want to challenge me on this.
Obama is wrong on this, so was Bush. This is a problem with our government in general, and politics. It’s not some grand new scheme created by Obama. I agree with you that Obama was supposed to be change, and here he is doing the same thing Bush did.
I would also ask you to be just as honest with yourself and how none of you cared when Bush did it, and there were no right wing press coming to the defense of anyone that Bush freezed out.
It’s also laughable for the administration to call MSNBC and CNN any better than Fox when it comes to being fair and balanced. MSNBC and CNN are as biased as Fox News. None of these cable news networks do a very good job at providing an unbiased point of view.
m says: >MSNBC and CNN are as biased as Fox News.
CNN is biased to the right. They have Lou Dobbs.
ImNotBlue says: m says:
October 23, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Amazing how one person defines a whole network. Sure they’ve got Rick Sanchez… but we’re not supposed to remember things like that.
In the world of M… “one is too many.” How respectful and open of you…
CaliforniaGuy says: .
Fox today, CNN tomorrow. The Chicago-style beatdown is here for three more years.
wiseguy says: Why hasnt anyone come up with a name for this.
How about FOXGATE
CaliforniaGuy says: .
Like Glenn said today, pay attention to when Rahm Emanuel said that it is important that CNN and other networks not follow Fox’s lead. Was this a f*cking threat by the Administration to use the “Al Capone” bat if other networks follow Fox’s lead?! The American people really wanted Obama to succeed, but you can take a man out of Chicago, you just can’t take Chicago out of him. Anyone watched The Untouchables lately?
Job hunting?
Use our proprietary jobs tool to access the largest pool of jobs aggregated from around the country.
The Seven Best (Or, Somewhat Memorable) Moments Of The Jay Leno Show
After 95 episodes, the epic failure known as The Jay Leno Show airs its final episode tonight. Of course, Leno himself will be back after the Olympics, comfortably at 11:35pm all over again. Which was pretty much the problem to begin with - the 10pm offering started as a similar product to the Tonight Show, and only became more like the old format as time went on.
Stephen Colbert: ‘Sarah Palin is a F***king Retard’
The usually reliable Keith Olbermann's inability to nail Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin on Limbaugh's use of the term "retard" has been pretty frustrating. Sure, he has posited Palin as a hypocrite, but several times he has repeated Rush's and Palin's dueling assertions that he was "quoting" Rahm Emanuel, or that he was being "satirical," without really challenging it. Luckily, Stephen Colbert actually knows what the word "satire" means, and deployed a pile of it on Palin and Rush last night.
More TV headlines:
»Jenny Sanford is All Things to All Pundits
»Enraged, Maddow Explains ‘Racist History’ Tea Party Is Embracing »38
»Keith Olbermann, Jon Stewart Fail to Eviscerate Sarah Palin »12
»Superbowl MVP Drew Brees on Letterman (with Baby Brees Backstage!)
»Welcome, @CraigyFerg! Craig Ferguson Joins Twitter »5
-
Coming soon...
-
Coming soon...
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | 
RSS
