Snoop Dogg’s Sexual Assault Accuser Drops Suit Entirely Following Allegations of Extortion
Emma McIntyre/Getty Images
The woman who sued Snoop Dogg for sexual assault and battery just days before his Super Bowl performance has dropped her case.
According to court documents obtained by Mediaite, the plaintiff, who brought her case using the pseudonym Jane Doe, informed the court she was dropping the case in its entirety on Wednesday night.
“This action is dismissed by the Plaintiff in its entirety,” the filing states.
The withdrawal came after the defense filed a motion to dismiss the case on March 24.
The plaintiff had previously sued Snoop Dogg — whose given name is Calvin Broadus — and his associate Bishop Don “Magic” Juan for a violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.
She specifically claimed Snoop Dogg and Juan, whose given name is Donald Campbell, had sexually assaulted her following one of the rapper’s concerts at Heat Ultra Lounge in Anaheim, CA.
The suit alleged that Jane Doe accepted a ride home from Juan following the 2013 concert and that she fell asleep in the car, only to wake up at Juan’s home instead of her own.
She allegedly then fell asleep at Juan’s home because she was “exhausted” and woke up at 4:00 AM the next morning. The complaint alleges that Juan “removed his penis from his pants and forced his penis in Plaintiff’s face,” and “repeatedly shoved his penis into Plaintiff’s mouth.”
Rolling Stone reported that the plaintiff claimed that Snoop Dogg went on to sexually assault her while at his recording studio.
“After a few minutes, defendant Snoop Dogg withdrew his penis from plaintiff’s mouth, visibly unsatisfied with plaintiff’s reluctance and disgust of being forced to engage in oral sex,” the complaint alleges. The rapper then allegedly “proceeded to masturbate and ejaculated on plaintiff’s upper chest and lower neck.” He then purportedly said, “I’ll get you something to clean up with” and left the accuser “humiliated, terrified and panicked” in the bathroom without returning.
Following initial news of the suit, a spokesperson for Snoop Dogg issued a statement to Mediaite vehemently denying the allegations and accusing the plaintiff of extortion:
The allegations by [Jane Doe] of sexual assault by Calvin Broadus (known as Snoop Dogg), are simply meritless. They appear to be part of a self-enrichment shakedown scheme by [Jane Doe] to extort Snoop Dogg right before he performs during this Sunday’s Super Bowl half-time show.
[Jane Doe’s] scheme involves concocting a legal complaint as an anonymous “Jane Doe” plaintiff, and, knowing full well it can be a public document, filing this complaint late Wednesday, only three days before the Super Bowl. In the complaint, [Jane Doe] manufactures an occurrence of more than 8 years ago, in 2013, for her false allegations. They are similar to what she filed using her own name as the plaintiff in December 2021 with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing.
To be clear, Mr. Broadus has never has had any sexual encounter whatsoever with [Jane Doe]. [Jane Doe’s] shakedown scheme is disgraceful. Her attempt to use the courts to advance this scheme is shameful too, and does a disservice to real victims who deserve to be believed.
[Jane Doe] was never employed by Snoop Dogg or any of his companies and has furnished no proof to support her claim of employment by Snoop Dogg and/or his companies.
