Bloomberg’s Close Call Reveals News Orgs Confusion, Did Jon Stewart See It Coming?
It looks like maybe a lot of people were more displeased with their lack of kitchen tables than was previously let on! Perhaps the biggest shocker to come out of last night’s elections was just how tiny the margin Bloomberg’s margin of victory was!
It was so close that at around 9:30 last night NBC called the election for Bloomberg and then had to reverse the call when it became too close to call. The NYT.com waded into similar murky territory, first running a banner that said “Bloomberg Wins Third Term as Mayor” and then changing it to “Bloomberg Projected to Win 3rd Term.”
It’s safe to say not a lot of people anticipated this outcome, least of all the Dems. I can’t be the only one who saw those retractions and wondered if someone named Bill Thompson was going to be our next mayor and whether I should be concerned about that. Lessons? $100 million can by you an election, but barely. Also, how many Dems are kicking themselves today (looking at you, Anthony Weiner) for not bothering to throw a hat in the NYC mayoral ring. Apparently the only people not buying into Bloomberg’s multi-gazillion dollar ad campaign were the voters. Why the close call? No doubt plenty of people will spend the day deciphering. But let’s go to Jon Stewart, shall we, who speculated the other night that “money bags” Bloomberg might just be a leetle too out of touch with the voters (video below):
“It’s an important election. But it all starts here, at your kitchen table.” Jon Stewart: “It’s a powerful message. Undercut by the fact that no one in New York City has a kitchen table.”
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Indecision 2009 – Vote or Keep Going About Your Day | ||||
|
||||
Stephen Colbert: ‘Sarah Palin is a F***king Retard’

The usually reliable Keith Olbermann's inability to nail Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin on Limbaugh's use of the term "retard" has been pretty frustrating. Sure, he has posited Palin as a hypocrite, but several times he has repeated Rush's and Palin's dueling assertions that he was "quoting" Rahm Emanuel, or that he was being "satirical," without really challenging it. Luckily, Stephen Colbert actually knows what the word "satire" means, and deployed a pile of it on Palin and Rush last night.
Keith Olbermann, Jon Stewart Fail to Eviscerate Sarah Palin
Hyperbole must be over. How else does one explain the extremely disappointing bits that Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann did on Sarah Palin last night? Handed (thank you, I'm here all week) 3 days of Palin material that rivaled anything George W. Bush ever gave them, Olbermann could barely manage a molecule of spittle, let alone a lather, and Stewart deployed his seldom-used Nerf™ jokes.
More TV headlines:
»President Obama’s Nobel Prize Money? It’s Still Waiting For Him To Claim
»Enraged, Rachel Maddow Explains ‘Racist History’ Tea Party Is Embracing »21
»Superbowl MVP Drew Brees on Letterman (with Baby Brees Backstage!)
»Welcome, @CraigyFerg! Craig Ferguson Joins Twitter »3
»Jay Leno Explains The Letterman Promo: “A Good Joke Is A Good Joke” »6
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives |
RSS






















» Login » Register