1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Does CNN’s Ratings Tailspin Make Jon Klein Vulnerable? Jim Walton Says No

» 9 comments

Cable news ratings for the first quarter came out this week, and its been a rather tough day for CNN. Writing for the NY Times, Bill Carter‘s story includes a headline that screams “CNN Fails to Stop Fall in Ratings.” No, it’s not good news – or more to the point — it’s actually more bad news. Insiders have long whispered about what’s going on at CNN, and alas, the continued and consistent poor ratings mean that its finally time to openly question Jon Klein‘s future in his role as President of CNN.

In today’s piece for the NY Times, Carter wrote:

CNN continued what has become a precipitous decline in ratings for its prime-time programs in the first quarter of 2010, with its main hosts losing almost half their viewers in a year.

CNN had a slightly worse quarter in the fourth quarter of 2009, but the last three months have included compelling news events, like the earthquake in Haiti and the battle over health care, and CNN, which emphasizes its hard news coverage, was apparently unable to benefit.

The losses at CNN continued a pattern in place for much of the last year, as the network trailed its competitors in every prime-time hour. (CNN still easily beats MSNBC in the daytime hours, but those are less lucrative in advertising money, and both networks are far behind Fox News at all hours.)

Carter is putting it nicely. Some lowlights for CNN’s First Quarter include the following:

  • CNN is down by double digits for every program in P2+ and A25-54
  • CNN lost nearly half of its prime time demo viewers for the quarter – network was down 42% over 1Q’09
  • Anderson Cooper is down a whopping 46% in the demo (at 10pm) and down 42% in P2+
  • Campbell Brown had her worst quarter ever with Total Viewers (down 44% in 25-54 and down 40% in P2+)
  • Larry King had his worst quarter ever with both Total Viewers and Adults 25-54 (down 43% in 25-54 and down 44% in P2+)
  • CNN’s recent addition, Rick’s List, is down 49% in 25-54 and down 42% in P2+
  • American Morning is down 29% in 25-54 and down 32% in P2+ and is getting beat by Morning Joe for the first time ever for an entire quarter in P2+

The news is not good for CNN, but to be fair, the cable news landscape has changed dramatically in the last few years. Opinion media, or as some would call “Personality Journalism” appear to be the most commercially viable (and most watched) programs on cable news. Fox News ratings dominance is well accepted (and their murderer’s row prime time lineup often rates better than MSNBC and CNN combined.) Under Klein’s leadership, CNN’s has eschewed personality driven, or opinion programs for straight news (though Larry King sometimes fits in that category.) CNN’s sister channel HLN is the place for personality, featuring Nancy Grace, Joy Behar and Jane Velez-Mitchell. Not surprisingly, HLN is widely viewed as enjoying a resurgence, while CNN is fading.

“Jon Klein is a strong leader and a talented programmer, and he has my full support.”
Jim Walton — President, CNN Worldwide

Which bring us back to Klein. Let’s start with the prime time line up. Most television programmers understand a basic trough to crafting a lineup – keep viewers tuned in from show to show, ideally offering consecutive programs that offer some common ligature between them. It’s sort of best viewed as a relay race – and the most successful networks handle the hand-offs beautifully. In that context, let’s look at CNN’s prime time lineup for the last three years. At 7PM Lou Dobbs offered a unique blend of business news and right-of-center politics, followed by Campbell Brown at 8pm – a show who’s amorphous mission was “No Bias, No BS” or something. At 9pm we have the legendary Larry King, who clearly appeals to an older demographic, then back at 10pm, the allegedly young and hipper Anderson Cooper till midnight. If anyone can explain the programming logic here, please comment below. Because this slate flows about as well as the Hoover Dam.

Last Fall, Lou Dobbs abruptly left his spot on the CNN dial, which gave Klein a perfect opportunity to show some creativity and forethought at the 7pm spot. He chose CNN Reporter John King, a rather predictable choice, that says as much about CNN’s lack of up-and-coming talent at CNN than correspondent John King. King is a world-class reporter, but his straight-ahead style recalls Judy Woodruff, Deborah Norville, Connie Chung, Campbell Brown, Aaron Brown, and sadly, every other failed CNN prime time program

When it comes to serious news reportage, nobody does it better than CNN (evidenced by their quick, thorough and intense coverage of the Haitian earthquake.) And in the brave new world of partisan news, there is a place for a fair arbiter of news; which is a role that CNN has ostensibly tried to fill. But unbiased does not mean uninteresting – as it often appears on CNN.

Earlier this year, Jon Klein seemed to suggest that ratings are besides the point, that advertisers are loathe to associate themselves with the sometimes bitter opinion makers, choosing instead to go with the safe outlet. In fact, while speaking at a NY Media Summit, Klein made that very point. Writing for econsultancy.com, Meghan Keane reported:

Speaking at the 2010 Media Summit in New York, the president of CNN said that television ratings don’t paint an accurate picture of his network’s strengths. But his reasoning is interesting — it’s not because FOX is beating them there, but due to competition from online sources that aren’t being tracked by the Nielsen ratings.

FOX consistently beats CNN in the ratings. And Klein has plenty of evidence to prove that those ratings don’t present a fair portrayal of popularity. For instance, CNN had 100 million viewers last month. That’s 10% more than FOX’s 90 million. But FOX’s visitors stay longer, view more often during primetime, and do other things that Nielsen takes into account when compiling its rankings.

Klein says “we think of ourselves as being first.” But that’s not exactly how these things work. Even if CNN sees itself as the most fair and balanced, informed and fast network out there, that doesn’t mean that viewers are going to.

To be fair, the larger point of the importance of being first, fast and fair is completely legitimate. But its convenient for Klein to dismiss the importance of television ratings, particularly with regards to CNN’s economic viability. One would gather that neither Jim Walton (President, CNN Worldwide) nor Jeff Bewkes (CEO of TimeWarner) would be quick to agree with Klein’s assessment. You know who else would disagree? Jon Klein from exactly five years ago to the day, when he told Charlie Rose:

“A couple of years down the line, we ought to be essential viewing. You ought to actively look to see what it is we have on when you come home, because we will have by then well established the idea that we’re always giving you some fresh angle or fresh information that you couldn’t get in any other way. That’s — I’ll consider that success. And my bosses will, too.”

When reached by Mediaite, CNN provided the following quote from Jim Walton: “Jon Klein is a strong leader and a talented programmer, and he has my full support.”

Jon Klein is a gentleman and an intellectual who is widely regarded as a class act, and is beloved personally on the staff at CNN. But the continued and consistent failure of ratings (and unspired programming choices) beg the question: how much longer will Jon Klein be allowed to drive this ship into the ground?

Disclosure – prior to working at Mediaite, I wrote and produced for HLN.

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • http://www.sailrabbits.com Magister

    Excellent piece and retweeted, though this is the part where I go into my familiar mantra…

    Quite possibly, CNN may have to do something to change the narrative and I’m sure some tweaks wouldn’t hurt, but I don’t see as much of a problem as everyone else.

    First of all, along the lines of what I commented to Gawker earlier: Larry King is popular worldwide and with the possible exception of Barbara Walters or maybe Anderson Cooper, I’m not seeing a lot of personalities with the heft to draw an international audience and even if a compromise figure was found, if you try to craft a show that might win in the US, you could lose the opportunity for wider distribution.

    Larry’s also down because quite a bit of his US audience has migrated over to Joy Behar on HLN. Joy does a lighter take on popular subjects and she has a built-in audience from daytime.

    What’s often lost on every discussion concerning ratings and the growth of HLN at the expense of the parent is that they’re actually the same company. Every dime that HLN takes in and every viewer that they gain goes into the CNN/TW column and because there’s a somewhat limited audience for news programming in primetime — it may be growing, but it’s still limited — unless CNN were to go all personality like their competitors, then there’s a significant risk that the growth of the parent could come from the child.

    Admittedly, I don’t have a pretty answer. If it were me, I might decide to do something to tweak around the edges, but any growth at eight is probably going to come from Headline and the only way that I see to play with Anderson would be to make him more like Greta, which could take away from the rerun of Nancy Grace.

    In fact, the only answer that I can see without totally reinventing the wheel with a personality-driven line-up that wouldn’t necessarily harm the child would be to simply give-up and switch over to a three hour block of lifestyle segments, along the lines of the old PM Magazine style. It wouldn’t win the ratings and it’d have no effect on the narrative, but it would be cheap and maybe there’s something to be said for that.

  • http://www.sailrabbits.com Magister

    Disclosure: Like most Americans and probably Bill Carter, I don’t really watch a lot of news programming in the evening. If someone were to pay me to watch or DVR, I’d be apt to do it, but by the time evening comes around unless there’s a breaking news event, I pretty much know the news of the day and as for the personality shows, I don’t really care what they think… which is a big part of CNN’s “problem”.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vik-Sidhu/122608564 Vik Sidhu

    To be fair Magister, you’re making a bad assumption on one key point – that the value of one CNN is equal to one HLN viewer. So if you’re saying that the decline in CNN can be made up by HLN, that’s simply not going to happen. CNN charges a heftier CPM premium than HLN – so clearly CNN viewers are much more valuable to TW in the grand scheme of things.

    Yeah, HLN can “steal” growth from CNN – but that is going to be reflected in the bottom line.

  • http://thedailybarb.com Burnnotice

    Anderson Cooper is down a whopping 46% in the demo (at 10pm) and down 42% in P2+ Wow! and he is the new up and comer? Thats Hilarious! If my sales conversion was down 46% and I was supposed to be the star player in my field. I would have been given my walking papers a long time ago…. Maybe he should try some real investigative reporting for a change. Oh thats right they don’t teach that anymore in journalism school. They just teach you how to propagandize, and sound witty. LOL

  • ice queen

    Magister that’s the problem people like Anderson Cooper are personalities not reporters. They read the teleprompter and that’s about it, nothing original. Granted the Haiti coverage was great, but there won’t always be disasters nor do I want there to be. But what abiout the other times when their in studio, one show is just a rehash of the one before it and it’s not even interesting. I’ve changed my viewing habits and no longer watch 360, it’s boring and the rest of the prime time line up puts me to sleep. Will Jon Klein leave, probably not, instead the rest of the anchors with the exception of Larry will become sacrificial lambs for better ratings.

  • http://www.sailrabbits.com Magister

    @Vik Sidhu: Good point about the value of viewers, but if say, they took Joy Behar or a personality of her caliber and moved then to CNN, then wouldn’t that be akin to an accounting trick?

    @ice queen: I have to admit that I used to watch CNN 10 o’clock more when it was Aaron Brown, but that’s because I appreciated the depth that Aaron could bring to the story. Right now though, unless they were going to build a new personality and try a MOR clone of Bill O’Reilly, I don’t know that any other jornalist could do a straight news show at ten and get much better ratings than Anderson and the names that come tomind would probably cost more than he’s being paid.

    To me, it’s back to the same conundrum: CNN’s demographic just isn’t that interested in primetime news. Speaking for myself, I’d much rather watch Sally Field, Criminal Intent or Burn Notice.

  • libra blue

    What does Jon Klein have on Jim Walton?

    @ice queen, Anderson used to be a great journalist, and occasionally he still is; he did a great job during the Haiti coverage. However, CNN has turned him into an insulting, arrogant, left wing teleprompter reading celebrity. That is why his audience is deserting him.

  • http://www.sailrabbits.com Magister

    OK – Again, Colby, excellent analysis at identifying the problem, but I may have gotten slightly off-point with my last paragraph to my most recent comment, so if I might take a moment to clarify.

    During events or due to external stimuli, there has been some expansion in the primetime news audience.

    In 2008, there was growth across the board because of the election and a lot of political viewing patterns were established around either extreme. This situation has only increased post-inauguration, as the growth of the Tea Party has opened the tent wider for FNC and the reaction from the left has been to consolidate around MSNBC, but by and large, the audience size isn’t infinite because there’s only so many people who will watch unscripted programming and everybody’s competing with every other station on the dial.

    Perhaps CNN could juice their shows with more opinionated hosts, but their growth would most likely have to come at the expense of their competitors and because the two extremes are well served by the current choices, they’d have to find someone to excitedly bloviate about the center… a seemingly impossible task. Especially when you consider that those in the center, who don’t get off on a Nancy Grace storyline are those least likely to watch non-event driven, primetime news.

  • m

    Good to hear that CNN still considers itself a news organization. Profits and ratings are important, but the main objective – news, still keeps on strong and a focus of the company. Great to hear that.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram