1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Conor Friedersdorf Talks About His New Gig at Andrew Sullivan’s Blog

» 5 comments

Andrew Sullivan’s blog at The Atlantic is adding a major name to the masthead with news that Conor Friedersdorf is joining the blog as a “senior editor.” In addition to Friedersdorf, Sullivan is adding a new staffer–Zoe Pollock–to focus on behinds-the-scene work and to some “underblogging.”

Friedersdorf, a former Sullivan intern, has made a name for himself over the last two years as one of the most promising conservative writers and thinkers.  He writes at the American Scene, Forbes, Daily Beast, and the late True/Slant and was involved in the well-thought of, but failed, Culture 11.His take-downs of Mark Levin and Andrew Breitbart, as well as concern over conservatism’s “narrative” problem have given him a major following and reputation.

In explaining Friedersdorf’s new role, Sullivan said:

Conor Friedersdorf, no stranger to Dish readers, will be under-blogging with his usual range of interests and keen eye, but also focusing on both the degeneracy of the conservative movement, and the green shoots we are beginning to see of a saner, more imaginative, more traditionally conservative policy revival.

Sullivan described himself as “a kind of composer/disk-jockey for the music that we play” in attempting to explain the new set-up at The Atlantic’s most popular blog. There has always been questions about how Sullivan operates his blog, especially in terms of the role of other staffers.  In December, there was a minor kerfuffle when one of Sullivan’s staffers appeared to pull the curtain off the blog’s workings

At that time, Sullivan was emphatic that The Dish worked better without attributing posts to a specific person since he was in control of the content and to the blog worked better if it “retain[ed] its identity as one single narrative conversation.”

So why would Friedersdorf  join Sullivan as an “underblogger” while his star is on the rise and some have argued he should have his own blog at The Atlantic?  Friedersdorf answered some questions for Mediaite:

Mediaite: Are you going to have your own byline?

When Andrew Sullivan goes on vacation, I’ll be guest blogging under my own byline. But usually, I won’t be publishing things on the blog myself, or submitting anything in my own voice. I’ll be directing his attention to items that fit the sensibility of The Daily Dish. He’ll review those items, publish when he agrees with my curatorial judgment, and either add his own commentary when he has a take on the subject, or else just post what amounts to a link and an excerpt sans reaction.

Mediaite: You’ve created your own identity as a successful blogger/opinion writer, so why start working on a blog so closely identified with one person?

Andrew Sullivan is one of the bloggers who introduced me to the medium about a decade ago. The others are Mickey Kaus, Megan McArdle, and Glenn Reynolds. All are extraordinary talents, and I’ve learned a lot from their writing and watching the evolution of their Web sites. It’s The Daily Dish that has changed the most. Nowadays it has daily features like A View From Your Window, it operates at a relentless pace like a broadcast, it features Andrew Sullivan’s extended takes on numerous issues, and it acts as a curatorial resource for a readership that is as thoughtful as any I’ve ever experienced. Past stints guest blogging at The Daily Dish afforded a close look at its reader e-mails, and it’s truly a pleasure to interact with a large online community of intelligent, delightfully diverse readers who are open to persuasion, rather than looking to consume only material that regurgitates what they already believe or else advances their ideological team.

In this new gig, I’ll mostly be working on the curatorial aspect of The Daily Dish. In other words, I’ll be getting paid to find exceptionally good writing and arguments on the Internet, so that an eager audience of thoughtful people can be exposed to them. That prospect is enormously appealing. Public discourse should function as a crucible, where ideas are tested, the best emerge strengthened, and the worst are destroyed. I also miss finding talented writers whose work deserves a wider audience. That was the biggest pleasure of being features editor at Culture11. In coming months, I hope I can alert Andrew and his readership to new voices.

Despite our differences on various specific matters, Andrew Sullivan and I share a commitment to an ongoing public conversation characterized by forceful disagreements, the airing of dissent, and a vision of readers as rational, mature, intelligent interlocutors. It’s why The Daily Dish is a good fit at The Atlantic, and why I revere that institution. Is there any other venue where the folks in charge are as likely to link and excerpt the most forceful arguments contrary to their own? And we’re all writing in the spirit “of no party or clique.” As The Daily Dish continues to evolve, I trust that core aspect will remain a constant. As a result, I can contribute to a site whose ongoing success and constant improvement I very much desire, even as I pursue outside writing dictated entirely by what I think is right. When that happens to be in disagreement with Mr. Sullivan, who is never one to shy away from an argument, that probably just increases the chances that it’ll get linked.


Mediaite: Are you going to continue your gigs at The American Scene, Forbes and The Daily Beast?

Emphatically yes.

The American Scene is a site for which I have great affection, and as long as they’ll have me, I’ll continue doing my best to live up to the exceptional groundwork laid by Reihan Salam and Ross Douthat, even if it means I’m always falling short of their examples and the posts published by my wonderful co-authors. I’m thrilled that my colleagues Lewis Dvorkin and Coates Bateman from True/Slant are bringing their insights to Forbes. And I love working with Tina Brown, Tom Watson and Bryan Curtis at The Daily Beast. Especially at a time when ever fewer publications are adding value in the editing process, no sane writer would turn down the chance for their feedback.

I’ve got other projects in the works too. Anyone interested can follow them all via the Twitter feed @conor64

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • BatBoy

    I don’t think I would publish that I went to work for Andrew Sullivan – Just saying!

  • Pablo

    Friedersdorf, a former Sullivan intern, has made a name for himself over the last two years as one of the most promising conservative writers and thinkers.

    Um, no. No, he isn’t.

  • Bootleghaircut

    I love the Atlantic but frankly as a progressive liberal I lost all respect for the libertarian sullivan when he went on his “trig parenthood” trip which was in my mind worse than being a birther, a 9-11 truther, or even your avergae conservative(nyuck). And Sullivan just didn’t let it go which made it worse and now I no longer read his blog.

    The last time I saw him his was on the Chris Mathews show playing race card against the tea party-he was sure quick to leap on that bandwagon which was stupid. During the last decade anytime a code pink feak in fright wig opened her mouth conservatives would say “there’s goes your typical liberal and anti-war kook” in an attempt to marginalize the legitimate anti-war movement so of course there was going to be guilt by association games played on the tea party-you have one racist sign and volia a meme is born.

    Frankly the biggest mistake Sullivan and the NAACP made is to attack the tea party as racists. Frankly the GOP NEEDS THE TEA PARTY because I would much rather listen to a bunch of smart libertarians discussing how to actually make small governemnt solutions work than have to listen to to truly odious social conservatives who want to fight the culture war. Believe me friends we want Rand Paul not Sarah Palin in charge of the GOP via the TEa Party.

    Perhaps the best sign that the tea drinkers are going to make a difference is that they’ve already called out the bogus PR exercise known as the tea party caucus-even they know Republicans as they currently are being led simply cannot be trusted.

  • republicanblack

    Ok, now this is pretty funny. I certainly lost respect for news organizations. I think they are almost equivalent to our intelligence community. But the greatest thing about this Shirley Sherrod debacle is that it is one part of a larger strategy. It’s obvious. It is almost the same thing every time. The far-right has an agenda and they want Obama gone and the best way to do that is to bring up race, check out this article I just came across that looks at the big picture:

    http://apleblog.com/2010/07/22/the-conservative-strategy-obama-is-a-racist/

  • Bootleghaircut

    Wow a black republican trying to play the race card whiile using an Alinskiite strategy to derail the topic of the thread.

    isn’t that like some kind of hat trick for stupidity?

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram