Gawker Can Call Joe Francis ‘Douche,’ But Can They Call Him ‘Rapist’?
Gawker brought in the coming end of the decade in a way that only Gawker could: by running a “douche of the decade” poll. The winner, Girls Gone Wild honcho Joe Francis, was not pleased. He didn’t especially object to the “douche” label — good luck making an issue of that when The New York Times runs A1 stories musing on the nature of douchiness — but to another, more loaded word they used to describe him: rapist.
Francis’ back-and-forth with Gawker’s legal department is revealing in many ways, and raises the question of what, if anything, the gossip site can’t get away with.
In the original “douche of the decade” post, Gawker’s Alex Pareene drops the “rapist” label offhandedly, pointing back to an excerpt of an LA Times profile of Francis in which a woman who had sex with Francis when she was 18 raises doubts about how consensual the encounter was. The story hardly makes Joe Francis look like a charming prince, but as Daily Intel points out, “Francis has never been convicted or even accused of [rape] in a court of law.”
Flash forward to Joe Francis’ letter to Gawker, titled “Hey Nick, Your fucked,” in which he threatened to sue them for causing a “10 million dollar deal” of his to fall through thanks to the ‘rapist’ label. Gawker took a screenshot of the letter, to which Joe Francis helpfully attached a shirtless picture of himself (below):
Hey Nick,
I am suing you tomorrow personally. You messed with the wrong guy. No one make up lies about me and gets away with it. I lost a 10 million dollar deal as a direct result of you calling me “a rapist”. You will be paying me every dime of that back and more! Are you mentally retarded? Do your research first. I am coming after you harder then I have ever went after anyone. I am going to wipe you off the grid!!!! YOU ARE DONE! I will take everything you have. You, Nick Denton, are truly the “Douche of the Decade” Merry Xmas IDIOT!!! Joe Francis P.S. I sent you an updated picture of how I actually look now so you can masturbate to it because you seem to be quite sexually obsessed with me.
Gawker legal ace Gaby Darbyshire fired back: “given his chosen career and his actions to date, it would be hard to say that your client really has any reputation of social probity and standing to damage at this point, now does he?” At that, Gawker graciously changed the “rapist” of the original article to “alleged rapist” and labeled Francis a “sore douche.”
What’s the punchline? Well, Gawker has certainly elevated the flamewar as journalistic practice to an art, and this is yet another time when they have used angry followup by one of their targets to fan the flames and get more publicity. Last year, NYU economist Nouriel Roubini likewise fell into Gawker’s trap when he responded to their (rather mean-spirited and unfair) posts about him with a series of angry rants which they duly published. (“Nick Denton is an Antisemite with a Nazi Mind.”)
Still, given the brazenness with which Gawker has gone after some of its targets, it’s pretty remarkable that they haven’t yet lost a big stack of cash in a defamation suit. The Wrap’s Dylan Stableford notes that “there are at least two outstanding lawsuits against Gawker at the moment: Eric Dane’s suit against Gawker’s screening of the so-called McSteamy sex tape – in which Gawker won a preliminary court battle recently; and Sean Salisbury’s suit against Gawker Media after a series of bizarre e-mails sent by the ex-ESPN football analyst to Gawker-owned Deadspin were posted on the site.” In the past, they’ve been sued by Fred “Limp Bizkit” Durst and walked away unscathed. One wonders if there have been other hidden lawsuits in Gawker’s past, but it seems unlikely given that they would probably try to squeeze a post or two out of them.
Is it possible that there have been out-of-court settlements for past Gawker transgressions? Yes, though it would be surprising if none of the disgruntled ex-Gawker employees elevated them to the public eye. Either way, the high profile of Gawker’s wars with the Joe Francises of the world makes for entertaining, occasionally shirtless theater.
2 comments
In response to a Florida lawsuit, Mr Francis’ attorney said “It’s apparent that a certain segment of our society has adopted a get rich quick scheme through frivolous litigation”. Other than money or his crowing about “burying them”, which I believe also got him a contempt citing in another Florida case, I’m not sure what else, Mr. Francis hopes to achieve.
A few days ago to my own blog, I linked to a California story about a fellow suing a local paper because they had referred to him as an “armed stalker” in a headline and this caused any Google searches on his name to be polluted by the accusation. He also feels this has hurt his business interests.
Clearly because he doesn’t understand how the Google cache works, the California man has expressed a willingness to settle, if the paper would just change their archived title. Unfortunately for him, though, the news articles and blogposts about his lawsuit has only increased the occurrence of the “armed stalker” label and now, thanks to his own lawsuit, it’ll take years for tie-in to work its way down the Google results.
Mr. Francis doesn’t appear to be a complete idiot. So, I can only assume that he’s filed this lawsuit in hopes of getting a payday, perhaps as some form of revenge or to get fifteen more minutes in the public eye. As Gaby said in response to the notice of suit, “Joe Francis” +rapist produces something like 165,000 Google hits (including his Wikipedia page) and because of the discussion surrounding the court action or the fact that “alleged” would have no bearing on search results, it’ll only go up exponentially over the course of this action, which may not bode well for Mr. Francis’s future endeavors.
I mean, what’s he going to do — Attach a court finding proclaiming him not a rapist to all business proposals?
Libel in the US is so difficult to prove, and as a result Gawker will always be unscathed. I think that’s for the best, since a little biliousness is the price we pay for truly free speech. If someone were to have standing for a libel suit in a British court, this might go differently.
Kathy Griffin On Gays In The Military, Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: It’s A Generational Thing

Kathy Griffin was in D.C. earlier this week for a rally at the capitol to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." While the My Life On The D List celebrity has made gay rights one of her biggest causes, she also took a moment to talk to interviewer Liz Glover about Scientology, Levi Johnston, and flying on Southwest.
Michael Moore Would Have Had Avatar Win Over Hurt Locker
Just because the Academy Awards happened two weeks ago doesn't mean that it's too late for Michael Moore to say his piece. Mainly, that Kathryn Bigelow's The Hurt Locker was a piece of crap because it was "lazy" and that James Cameron's Avatar was amazing because of its portrayal of how we "privatized war" and treated the planet.
More Online headlines:
»John Boehner’s Office Selectively Edits Alcee Hasting’s ‘We Make Up The Rules’ Clip »12
»Obama’s Final Push On Health Care To Democratic Caucus On Capitol Hill »16
»“I’m With Coco Artist” Hits Jackpot, Sort Of
»Democrats Announce They Won’t Use “Deem And Pass” »10
»Rahm Emanuel On 60 Minutes: “Fringe Group Has Taken Control” Of GOP »70
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives
| Dan Abrams, Founder
| Hosting by Datagram
|
RSS























