1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Nashville Magazine Accidentally Publishes ‘Racist’ First Draft Review Of The Musical In The Heights

» 9 comments

A writer’s first draft is typically filled with errors that need to be paved over, which is why it can be extremely embarrassing if these drafts ever make it out into the harsh gaze of the public’s eye. What can be more embarrassing is if those “errors” are actually “descriptive language” that some might find racially insensitive. That’s what happened in Tennessee as the Nashville Scene has apologized for a review of In the Heights, the hit musical set in New York’s diverse Washington Heights neighborhood, that many readers and theater fans called “racist.” The Nashville Scene’s editor has written a statement saying the review was merely a first draft that got published by accident.

So what did the original review say? Well, from the beginning, critic Martin Brady seemed to be debating Broadway’s insistance on giving every ethnic group a musical (he began the review: “What will the American musical do for thematic material when the melting pot has completely turned to ethnic mush and no group is really underprivileged?”). This could be the beginning of an interesting argument if it weren’t phrased so antagonistically (darn “underprivileged” folks!). It would also be more appropriate around the time that, like, Fiddler on the Roof was coming out. Our “ethnic musicals” really that popular in 2011? Is there anyone out there really rejoicing because, finally, the nation’s spidermen and women have their own show to sing along to?

The review continued in that frame:

“Creator Lin-Manuel Miranda’s story — book by Quiara Alegría Hudes — tells of a vibrant community in New York’s Washington Heights neighborhood, ‘where the coffee from the corner bodega is light and sweet, the windows are always open and the breeze carries the rhythm of three generations of music.’ In other words, an excuse to employ dynamic youthful minority performers who dance and sing and holler to a lot of salsa music and groove on lyrics about Latin loving and partying.”

As this reader pointed out, “excuse?” But it was the last line that really ticked people off.

“But if you like your ingénues brown and leggy and your music ‘hot, hot, hot,’ this is the show for you.”

Yeah, no matter what the intentions were, that’s the kind of thing most editors would put the kibosh on. So how did the review get online? This was Nashville Scene’s editor Jim Ridley’s response:

“An unedited first draft of Martin Brady’s Critics’ Pick of In the Heights ran by accident in the online edition of the Nashville Scene. As is the case here, first drafts are places for writers to work out ideas that should often be discarded before they ever see the light of day. Instead, the uncorrected piece was published online, and many commenters were offended by the descriptive language in the piece — concerns that were raised with the author during the editing process, and which, to his credit, he apologized for and agreed to change. The Scene apologizes to all readers offended by the piece; I offer my own personal apology as well and accept responsibility for the error.”

So these were “ideas” that needed to be “discarded?” How odd. Oh well, I guess I should just be glad, again, that I write for a website that never feels any need to censor the thoughts of its staff.

Editor’s Note: This post has been edited from an earlier form. Like many of Mr. Bershad’s articles, it was filled with strange and unnecessary references to his distrust of the people of Norway. Normally we take these out before posting, but, somehow, these were missed. The comments were offensive and had absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. We apologize to any readers who were offended. Particularly any Norwegian readers. No one at Mediaite believes you are “all murderous vikings.”

Editor’s Second Note: Please don’t tell Mr. Bershad about that first note. We’ve never told him we edit his posts and, since he never reads his work over (“I only move forward! Like a f**king shark!”), he has yet to find out.

(h/t Poynter)

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • lazzzlo

    Editor’s Note:


    Editor’s Second Note:

    Wait, Mediaite actually does have an editor?

    Oh, I fear for the state of journalism.

    ;)

  • Arch

    That’s what happened in Tennessee as the Nashville Scene has apologized for a review of In the Heights, the hit musical set in New York’s diverse Washington Heights neighborhood, that many readers and theater fans called “racist.”

    So the review is racist? Not the show? Considering there were two supposed editors notes, that could have been clearer.

    /Justsaying

  • http://twitter.com/SailRabbits Magister

    Those damn Norwegians and their vagina barrels.

    Note: This comment was directed to the unedited first draft.

  • http://rvolt24.blogspot.com/ rvolt24

    i wonder if anyone would have picked up this story if the author had been latino… if he had been speaking of his own race, how would that have changed the perception?

    for example, there was very little furor over Daisy Hernandez discussing her concern over the race of the Arizona shooter (Jared Loughner)… she used terms identical to those of those of Martin Brady… “It’s safe to say there was a collective sigh of brown relief when the Tucson killer turned out to be a gringo.”… it might even be said that Daisy’s use of the term “Gringo” in her article, not once but twice, could be termed racist on her part.

    the point is this… Martin Brady’s use of those terms may have been insensitive… he could (obviously) have used better terminology… but let’s hold the “racist” term for those who truly deserve it… neither Brady nor Hernandez meant to disparage a race, even if that’s what it sounded like… they both deserve the same consideration and forgiveness.

  • CRW

    Nice try, guys. If you really had editors, they would have corrected “Our” to “Are” in the second paragraph sentence, “Our ‘ethnic musicals’ really that popular in 2011?”

  • VW

    Our “ethnic musicals” really that popular in 2011? Is there anyone out there really rejoicing because, finally, the nation’s spidermen and women have their own show to sing along to?

    ————————-

    Our???? hahaha, actually, this is a sad commentary on the dearth of blogs and the lowering quality of writing and proof reading. Lastly, the story was a letdown in terms of its content.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tyrone-Copper/670455578 Tyrone Copper

    Wow… I asked myself over and over again this one question. “Who really cares?” There’s real racism out there and as far as I can see this is not one of them.

  • BOMBSHELL

    OK morons, listen up!

    GBR (whom the family lovingly refers to as “Goober-Brained Retard) put our son, BOMBSHELL JR. on a bus to Thule, Greenland. He told our boy there would be a kitten waiting for him when he got to Greenland, and you know how our son is ALWAYS asking everyone he meets to buy him a kitten.

    Well, the kid is sort of dimwitted just like his ol’ man, and so I’m stepping in until we get him back to provide moral support for my ol’ man, and you’d danged well better NOT mess with me! Just know that I am GBR’s ol’ lady, and give me the respect I demand.

  • reader3

    I’m guessing the local papers in Washington Heights were even less pc when “Li’l Abner opened on Broadway.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram