A victim of her own limitations… but that is hard for her to understand.

I wonder which kid held up the cue cards or maybe it was Todd.

Gawd…rehearsed much?

When she had that MLK quote handy when Hannity asked her if she was radioactive I new I was watching an infomercial.

Another pathetic display by the comedy duo of Hannity and Palin.

I thought as a country we agreed that we would not politicize this tragic event any longer and tonight half-term frm. Gov. Sarah “Blood Libel” Palin politicizes this event, again.

Stay classy governor. I hope you do run for president and end up like Barry Goldwater: disgraced and forgotten.

i thought mediate was an conservative blog? why are they attacking palin…- I wonder if sarah is still planning that trip to Israel| to explain her blood libel comment…as in no surprise we all knew she would pull the victim card

Oh Frances, you’re showing your liberal bias.

The interview was great.

Now back to watching Castle. :)

BFD said:
Gawd…rehearsed much? When she had that MLK quote handy when Hannity asked her if she was radioactive I new I was watching an infomercial. Another pathetic display by the comedy duo of Hannity and Palin.

I wonder how long she had the questions ahead of time? I almost think De Niro did better in his acceptance speech. Ok, well no, but close.

That was modern propaganda. Plain and simple.

Frances, Sarah Palin was accused for being an accessory to murder. How could you miss that? Why criticize someone who has the right to defend themselves. I wonder if Dan Abrams approved of what you posted?

Moving on. Good for Sarah, she is truly inspiring in these awful times. Shame on those in the media like Jessica Yellin on CNN, all of MSNBC and even Geraldo Rivera on FOX News for not apologizing to Sarah Palin for their false accusations.

People need to stop referring to the “sarah Palin constituency.” She’s a media personality. That’s it. She has no constituents.

Over/Under 300 comments mostly by screeching libs who swear she’s irrelevant and stupid , but still comment ?

murf said:
Over/Under 300 comments mostly by screeching libs who swear she’s irrelevant and stupid , but still comment ?

yeah kind of like on threads about Olbermann. He’s not relevant to you guys but the posts hit up to 100′s.

Frances – The guy is left-leaning. The NY Times just had an article about him where it was mentioned that when Jarod saw Bush, he would foam at the mouth.

“His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/16loughner.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1

This line is on Page 3

Frances wrote;

“Even when discussing deranged killer Jared Loughner, she described him as “left-leaning” (Loughner’s only political views, other than loving Mein Kampf and The Communist Manifesto, appear to be anti-grammar)”

1) Let’s see one of his friends in high school said he was a “RADICAL, LIBERAL LEFTISTS” and that was even reported here on Mediaite and on ABC news.

2) One of Loughner’s friends in an ABC interview stated that Loughner liked watching Zietgeist movies on Youtube…which all happen to be LEFTIST.

3) Loughner favorited a video of someone burning an American flag.

4) NYT reported that Loughner would get angry everytime he saw an image of George W. Bush

5) One of his friends said Loughner believed that Bush and the U.S. Government was behind 9/11

Wow Frances don’t you even follow the news?

Did you license this video from Fox News Channel?

Is this video even available on their website yet?

Sarah, quit digging, go away, just shut up,Please!

All about me, me, me… right Sarah?(Shaking My Head)

Funny how this site puts up hub after hub of Chris Matthews bashing Palin . Chris Matthews a man of no significant s on and National stage .
And when it is Palin on one of these hubs . Its how she screwed up .

This site is a joke . I’m done with it . Cause it has rot gut substance . Maybe Chris Matthews owns this site I don’t know .
Later :)

I don’t think Hannity knows how goggle works.

Also that “person” who said Palin was radioactive was Fox News’ own Brit Hume.

Frances obviously watched the interview with an opinion already formed. Most of what Frances wrote is just typical far-left talking points. The left, on a daily basis, regurgitates hate & vitriol towards Palin then they get offended when she responds. I’d like to see Frances being linked to a murder by just about every MSM outlet, have people on TV attacking her teenage children, and constantly being the recipient of death threats. Lets see how Frances would handle it. But, as has been demonstrated previously, Frances is nothing but a far-left kook. Therefore, his/her response is pretty typical and unsurprising.

Canadian jihadists training in North Waziristan: report http://bit.ly/etmFLU

Tucker P. said:
Funny how this site puts up hub after hub of Chris Matthews bashing Palin . Chris Matthews a man of no significant s on and National stage .
And when it is Palin on one of these hubs . Its how she screwed up .

This site is a joke . I’m done with it . Cause it has rot gut substance . Maybe Chris Matthews owns this site I don’t know .
Later :)

This site is a joke and these writers are not real reporters, but Democratic operatives.

Notice there is NO story about how the night before Olbermann was tweeting how great the guy who went off and made a death threat.

NONE…NADA…NIL

That was big and yet there is no mention of Keith Olbermann saying he stands by the crazy guy who made the death threat.

NOT ONE.

SuperChuñdy said:
I don’t think Hannity knows how goggle works.

Also that “person” who said Palin was radioactive was Fox News’ own Brit Hume.

Yes – that’s called being fair and balanced. Now go read a book.

TangledThorns said:
Frances, Sarah Palin was accused for being an accessory to murder. How could you miss that? Why criticize someone who has the right to defend themselves.

But according to Palin was not defending herself.

S Palin said:
My defense wasn’t self-defense

TangledThorns said:
Frances, Sarah Palin was accused for being an accessory to murder. How could you miss that? Why criticize someone who has the right to defend themselves. I wonder if Dan Abrams approved of what you posted?

Mr. Abrams definitely approved this post. You know his saying: Palin is good…for page views.

SuperChuñdy said:

Mr. Abrams definitely approved this post. You know his saying: Palin is good…for page views.

That means no one cares about Keith Olbermann…lol

A FOX PAC interview of Palin doesn’t even qualify as “slow pitch” softball — it’s more akin to a game of T-ball. 

So what insights into Sarah’s psyche were elucidated from this compelling, newsworthy interview? Palin can do no wrong … according to Palin.
 
Of course, the majority of Americans in both parties now wish that the Whining Wannabe from Wasilla would quietly go away, but hey, the sycophants on FOX News still love her, so it’s all good.

OK, so nothing rebutting anything she said, but 521 words about what a horrible job she did. Why am I not surprised?

Needless to say, my impression was slightly different.

WCinWI said:
Yes – that’s called being fair and balanced. Now go read a book.

Any suggestions? I started America by Heart, but never finished it because I kept vomiting after I read each page.

Poor Palin just keeps digging her own grave,so to speak.

Publius219 said:
That was modern propaganda. Plain and simple.

Propaganda implies that falsehoods are being offered. Is that what you’re getting at, and if so, how?

SuperChuñdy said:
Any suggestions? I started America by Heart, but never finished it because I kept vomiting after I read each page.

You might want to see a doctor about that. Can you get a referral for a shrink?

Tucker P. said:
Funny how this site puts up hub after hub of Chris Matthews bashing Palin . Chris Matthews a man of no significant s on and National stage .
And when it is Palin on one of these hubs . Its how she screwed up .

This site is a joke . I’m done with it .
Later :)

No one cares.

buh bye

BFD said:
When she had that MLK quote handy when Hannity asked her if she was radioactive I new I was watching an infomercial.

Another pathetic display by the comedy duo of Hannity and Palin.

- i totally agree – Sarah Palin’s only good at being Sarah Palin. All she did was keep her base stirred up & remind the rest of us why she’s only tabloid fodder

lonestar77 said:
Frances obviously watched the interview with an opinion already formed. Most of what Frances wrote is just typical far-left talking points. The left, on a daily basis, regurgitates hate & vitriol towards Palin then they get offended when she responds. I’d like to see Frances being linked to a murder by just about every MSM outlet, have people on TV attacking her teenage children, and constantly being the recipient of death threats. Lets see how Frances would handle it. But, as has been demonstrated previously, Frances is nothing but a far-left kook. Therefore, his/her response is pretty typical and unsurprising.

Martel has that lib gene. I don’t know what interview he was watching but it wasn’t the one with Palin.
This was just loony.

“For the rest of America, however– especially swing voters– wallowing in self-pity when six people are dead and a Congresswoman is in the hospital cannot be expected to go over well. Her task tonight, should she be interested in the presidency, was to prove that in times of crisis she could keep her cool and address the situation while looking beyond herself and not getting in the way of the tragedy.”

For the tten thousand google results that Hannity got for “Sarah Palin, Tucson tragedy”, I suggest for Sarah Palin that we substitute the name “Francis Martel”.

From here on out, we should be discussing the linkage of Francis Martel with mass murder, rather than Sarah Palin.

Oh, it’s true that the president a president has invoked Rush Limbaugh, several times, and complained about Limbaugh’s criticism his administration. We a federal agency that fired Shirley Sherrod, due to … someone’s… concerns about what Glenn Beck might say about a video.

But rest assured, Francis Martel could take all that and more.

So when we’re talking about the IMMENSE focus on Sarah Palin, after the murders of 9 people, by a guy who can’t be connected to anything but madness, let’s substitute the name Francis Martel for Sarah Palin’s.

She won’t mind. Francis is certainly not going to play the victim in this story.

And goodness knows, she doesn’t really have to.

SuperChuñdy said:
Also that “person” who said Palin was radioactive was Fox News’ own Brit Hume.

He’s probably a RINO.

More people will watch the interview than more people will read this blog on Mediaite.

LOL

On a similar note, I just vomited watching Keith’s Special Comment praising himself as one of only two people who actually apologized for past rhetoric.

Keith, when you start bragging about apologizing it kinda negates the apology to begin with. How much fucking credit do you want to give yourself for not doing the wrong thing?

Out of them all, Keith is the one with the biggest and blindest ego.

SuperChuñdy said:
But according to Palin was not defending herself.

Mr. Abrams definitely approved this post. You know his saying: Palin is good…for page views.

Yes. Palin was defending both your and my right to say things that might have a “tinge” of mean to them, without being called an accessory to murder – see, she does care about the Left. :)

I saw part of the interviewre and she did good. She doesn’t require a teleprompter, either.

SuperChuñdy said:
Any suggestions? I started America by Heart, but never finished it because I kept vomiting after I read each page.

War and Peace. Hopefully that’ll keep you busy for awhile.

What do we expect from a left leaning hater of Palin, the first few sentences were already so wrong, she was strong, totally in control and to listen to her its so different from how the press describes her, Frances you watched this interview with your mind already made up, you did not see the interview with a clear head, you hate her as most here at mediate and you actually lied, she did not look at all like you said. go back and look at it with a clear, fresh mind if you can, doubt it. And by the way she spoke the truth about the media, she was targeted, oh excuse me for using that word, but she was from the beginning from all the loony, left liberal blogs, what that loon from daily kos said was a travesty, just showed how crazy they are, and the media ignores it. Don’t blame Palin one bit for finally defending herself.

Tucker P. said:
Funny how this site puts up hub after hub of Chris Matthews bashing Palin . Chris Matthews a man of no significant s on and National stage .
And when it is Palin on one of these hubs . Its how she screwed up .

This site is a joke . I’m done with it . Cause it has rot gut substance . Maybe Chris Matthews owns this site I don’t know .
Later :)

Bye.

Cecelia said:
“For the rest of America, however– especially swing voters– wallowing in self-pity when six people are dead and a Congresswoman is in the hospital cannot be expected to go over well. Her task tonight, should she be interested in the presidency, was to prove that in times of crisis she could keep her cool and address the situation while looking beyond herself and not getting in the way of the tragedy.”

.

Actually Frances a poll already shows that PALIN HAS GAINED in popularity after this BLOOD LIBEL by you and your friends in the Liberal Media.

So there you go.

Would have been a whole lot better if Piers would have interviewed Palin.

I wonder if anyone has mentioned something very obvious. The comparisons between these two women, Sarah Palin and Gabrielle Giffords. One an exceptionally gifted politician who has a brilliant career and life ahead of her if she recovers from her grievous wounds and the other, Sarah Palin. As John McCain’s career winds down, one of the things he’ll forever be remembered for is inserting Sarah Palin into the American psyche. Poor John McCain who out of desperation elevated Ms Palin into a role she is totally unsuited for, and poor us for having to endure this superficial, and as we’re seeing immature, unformed person. Hopefully, she’ll soon have her fill of booty and be gone. I’m sure what I’m saying will upset my rightwing blogcomrades. I really don’t hate Sarah Palin, but I do resent that the corrupted political system and the gullibility of my fellow American allows the Sarah Palins and George Bushes to gain so much prominence.

Frances Martel proves again that a liberal can get swim ever deeper into the sewer. Frances Martel starts the bile and hate in the headline with the word “livid” which is a total misrepresentation of what Palin was saying.
I won’t waste my time going through this collection of cow dung, but will say that Frances now joins Tommy Christopher as a twin in the Palin hating coming from this web site.
I now will delete this site from my bookmarks and wish the scum and sleaze balls on this site a happy life practicing hate and bile and hope that they all develop puss filed scabs that ooze all day. This imagery fits with my image of Frances and Tommy…. two individuals with puss filled sores and scabs all over, spewing bile and hate and reveling in it. Typical warped liberals with no shame.

Color Me Badd said:
Bye.

You leaving?

New Poll:

“Palin’s handling of Tucson tragedy…

Disapprove 46%
Approve 30%

WAPO/ABC News Poll – Jan 16″

And you Righty’s thought all week that Sarah was winning her little campaign. lolol

Latin2 said:
Actually Frances a poll already shows that PALIN HAS GAINED in popularity after this BLOOD LIBEL by you and your friends in the Liberal Media.

So there you go.

You keep saying that but you never provide sources. Anyone can pull a poll out of their ass.

*please, no ass-pole jokes-thank you*

It shouldnt have come to this. Poor lady shouldnt have to defend herself against those vicious attacks from so called journalists. This is really a bad precedent for any politician to engage in controversial political debate, I.e. Health care and current foreign policy. Then again, woudnt it have served her better if she hadn’t been so hellbent in proving that only she cares for America and the rest of the democratic party wants to destroy the union?

Every critique of Palin isn’t bile and hate, you know. She’s a public figure. She’s a politician. Her response to the Tucson shooting wasn’t very adept, politically. When six people are killed and many more shot, including a member of Congress, Palin is not the victim and she shouldn’t try to make the story about her.

Sure, lots of people on the internet immediately referenced that graphic from her website, as if she had intended for this to happen. But her rhetoric has been incredibly over-the-top and it’s fair to critique that. She could have responded to the Tucson shootings in a way that showed more respect instead of focusing mostly on herself and how she’s been wronged, yet again.

WCinWI said:
“tinge” of mean

What planet are you on.She is Radioactive but good for Ratings,huh. Poor,poor Palin lets all say it together …awwwww.

It’s strange how callous most people would never care about the security of Sarah Palin and her family while accusing them of playing a part in the shooting of Rep; Giffords. Imagine if someone have to accuse President B. Obama of contributing to the 9/11 massacre ’cause he opposed the war in Iraq? There are journalist on the left who would go to any length to assassinate the character of anyone who dare oppose President Obama or would be a force in derailing his re-election.
Obama camp have always used people in the media to put strong opponents on the defensive while making in-roads in wining public approval. No one cares that the lives of Beck, Palin and co are being endangered while accusing them of things they have no part in. Remember during the presidential primaries when these same tactics was used on the Clintons? Different segments of people in high position where used as surrogates to disparage the Clintons… they were called racists, pimps, radioactive, divisive, thieves, murderers etc. MSNBC was largely used as medium to spread and assassinate their characters. 2012 presidential election is coming up and now the usual suspects are up to their old tricks.
The right must and should find ways to link poverty in urban areas, murders in urban areas to President Obama’s failure to have a tangible plan to combat them. Republicans must find ways to always, always, repeat always link President Obama to any bad thing. The idea is accuse him of all kind of things and hopefully something sticks. The Obama camp will also spend time trying to defend themselves while the right can have easier time to win the hearts of electorates.
It’s hard to fathom that the likes of Sen; Manchin (Democrat of West Virginia) would make political commercials in which he used a gun to shoot at a policy he promised to oppose President Obama on… and the professional left would not use it as an example of fuming violent political rhetoric while accusing Palin of such.
Long live the President of the United States! Long live President Obama!!!

I tend to find Martel more righty than lefty, but as a guy who has pretty much constant disdain for Palin I’ll say this: I thought she comported herself quite well. I see some of Martel’s points, but I think she makes too much of them at times; on balance, Palin did one of the best jobs she’s done in front of the camera.

ROCKSTEADY said:
What planet are you on.She is Radioactive but good for Ratings,huh. Poor,poor Palin lets all say it together …awwwww.

You see, Palin defends your right to be mean….as you so eloquently proved right there.

You should really thank Palin.

Emman said:
It’s strange how callous most people would never care about the security of Sarah Palin and her family while accusing them of playing a part in the shooting of Rep; Giffords. Imagine if someone have to accuse President B. Obama of contributing to the 9/11 massacre ’cause he opposed the war in Iraq? There are journalist on the left who would go to any length to assassinate the character of anyone who dare oppose President Obama or would be a force in derailing his re-election.
Obama camp have always used people in the media to put strong opponents on the defensive while making in-roads in wining public approval. No one cares that the lives of Beck, Palin and co are being endangered while accusing them of things they have no part in. Remember during the presidential primaries when these same tactics was used on the Clintons? Different segments of people in high position where used as surrogates to disparage the Clintons… they were called racists, pimps, radioactive, divisive, thieves, murderers etc. MSNBC was largely used as medium to spread and assassinate their characters. 2012 presidential election is coming up and now the usual suspects are up to their old tricks.
The right must and should find ways to link poverty in urban areas, murders in urban areas to President Obama’s failure to have a tangible plan to combat them. Republicans must find ways to always, always, repeat always link President Obama to any bad thing. The idea is accuse him of all kind of things and hopefully something sticks. The Obama camp will also spend time trying to defend themselves while the right can have easier time to win the hearts of electorates.
It’s hard to fathom that the likes of Sen; Manchin (Democrat of West Virginia) would make political commercials in which he used a gun to shoot at a policy he promised to oppose President Obama on… and the professional left would not use it as an example of fuming violent political rhetoric while accusing Palin of such.
Long live the President of the United States! Long live President Obama!!!

Huh?

It’s astounding. You have Pres Obama in speeches mentioning the criticism of Rush Limbaugh, at least twice. You have Shirley Sherrod getting fired over what Glenn Beck might say.

However, Palin is playing the victim for a week long mediapalooza linking her with a schizophrenic who killed nine people.

Latin2 said:
Actually Frances a poll already shows that PALIN HAS GAINED in popularity after this BLOOD LIBEL by you and your friends in the Liberal Media.

So there you go.

Amongst which key demographic, though?

ganymede said:
I wonder if anyone has mentioned something very obvious. The comparisons between these two women, Sarah Palin and Gabrielle Giffords. One an exceptionally gifted politician who has a brilliant career and life ahead of her if she recovers from her grievous wounds and the other, Sarah Palin. As John McCain’s career winds down, one of the things he’ll forever be remembered for is inserting Sarah Palin into the American psyche. Poor John McCain who out of desperation elevated Ms Palin into a role she is totally unsuited for, and poor us for having to endure this superficial, and as we’re seeing immature, unformed person. Hopefully, she’ll soon have her fill of booty and be gone. I’m sure what I’m saying will upset my rightwing blogcomrades. I really don’t hate Sarah Palin, but I do resent that the corrupted political system and the gullibility of my fellow American allows the Sarah Palins and George Bushes to gain so much prominence.

Well said.

Go ahead Sarah. Keep talking to the 2-3 million braindead that watch Fox News. The remaining 297 million of us will not vote for you – ever – for anything.

WCinWI said:
You should really thank Palin.

I Pity Poor,poor Palin.Now she can add Victim to her resume.

Latin2 said:
This site is a joke and these writers are not real reporters, but Democratic operatives.

Then go find another sight and quit your bitching.

My impression from her first response was not that she said anything really off, but that she made this all about her. I’m getting the impression she did that again. I can’t see that making a good impression on people.

ROCKSTEADY said:
I Pity Poor,poor Palin.Now she can add Victim to her resume.

Yeah – being considered an accessory to murder. Gosh – what a resume builder.

People want this pathetic nut job to run for president? They actually support her? This says as much about them as it does about her.

da-wdc said:
Every critique of Palin isn’t bile and hate, you know.

The ones that claim she has Gabby Giffords’ blood on her hands are.

lonestar77 said:
Frances obviously watched the interview with an opinion already formed. Most of what Frances wrote is just typical far-left talking points. The left, on a daily basis, regurgitates hate & vitriol towards Palin then they get offended when she responds. I’d like to see Frances being linked to a murder by just about every MSM outlet, have people on TV attacking her teenage children, and constantly being the recipient of death threats. Lets see how Frances would handle it. But, as has been demonstrated previously, Frances is nothing but a far-left kook. Therefore, his/her response is pretty typical and unsurprising.

Hmm…accusing someone of vitriol while doing it in the same post. Hypocrite much?

Latin2 said:
This site is a joke and these writers are not real reporters, but Democratic operatives.

Notice there is NO story about how the night before Olbermann was tweeting how great the guy who went off and made a death threat.

NONE…NADA…NIL

That was big and yet there is no mention of Keith Olbermann saying he stands by the crazy guy who made the death threat.

NOT ONE.

What’s keeping you here? A bunch of whining miscreants you wingnuts are. Go to Sludge Report where you belong.

CosmosDan said:
My impression from her first response was not that she said anything really off, but that she made this all about her. I’m getting the impression she did that again. I can’t see that making a good impression on people.

Oh sure…. Pres. Obama mentions criticism he’s received from Rush Limbaugh in two different speeches. Shirley Sherrod is fired because the Administration is so frightened of what Glenn Beck may say over a video.

However, you have a week long mediapalooza linking Palin to a schizophrenic who shot sixteen people and after there’s no link found, she’s supposed to be non-solipsistic and say— I acknowledge your drift, media…. I’ll try to do better… After 10,000 google hits linking me with Loughner… it’s not about me…

Gasket said:
Hmm…accusing someone of vitriol while doing it in the same post. Hypocrite much?

What’s keeping you here? A bunch of whining miscreants you wingnuts are. Go to Sludge Report where you belong.

You do realize that Drudge is only a group of site links and not a blog right? :) Hotair is the conservative place to be.

Oh…and about that whole calling out someone for vitriol….not cool when you just posted your own vitriolic rant.

Remember back in the 2008 primaries when Palin said Hillary should quit complaining about how badly the media was treating her. Palins been doing the same thing ever since then.

the real john t said:
Remember back in the 2008 primaries when Palin said Hillary should quit complaining about how badly the media was treating her. Palins been doing the same thing ever since then.

Palin-Hillary 2012. Bring it!

If you take into account all of the coincidences – Gabriel Giffords statements prior to the shooting, her desire to tone down the rhetoric and work together constructively; Loughner’s seizing onto political rhetoric, his apparent obsession with grammar necessary for communicating with one another; Palin’s cross hair map, certain pols tendency to use language to tap fear and anger for motivation; If I were a religious person I’d consider this a sign.

I hope Sarah Palin recovers from this tragedy.

You NEVER fail to disappoint Frannie!! Once again you prove why you are unable to get a real journOlism job. Kudos for your impartial reporting!

WCinWI said:
Palin-Hillary 2012. Bring it!

I hope you didn’t mean Palin versus Hillary in 2012. Hillary would mop the floor with Palin. Palin wouldn’t have a chance against Hillary.

WCinWI said:
Palin-Hillary 2012. Bring it!

Seems she should have seen it didn’t work for Hillary, so why in the world would it work for her?

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
You NEVER fail to disappoint Frannie!! Once again you prove why you are unable to get a real journOlism job. Kudos for your impartial reporting!

Yo – dummy. Go find a site that doesn’t upset you so much. And for the record, click on the site’s “about us” link at the bottom and you’ll find: “Mediaite is the site for news, information and smart opinions about print, online and broadcast media, offering original and immediate assessments of the latest news as it breaks.:

OPINION. Do you know what that is? I’m assuming you do, you Fox News robot. If you don’t like the opinion, why get your balls all sweaty over it? Go find a site that you can drool over. Like Fox Nation or something equally as bizarre.

Emman said:
It’s hard to fathom that the likes of Sen; Manchin (Democrat of West Virginia) would make political commercials in which he used a gun to shoot at a policy he promised to oppose President Obama on…

I just saw tonight where he said in retrospect it wasn’t a good idea.

See, that’s really all Palin had to do was take the high road.

The rest of your post was crap.

MiddleRoader said:
Seems she should have seen it didn’t work for Hillary, so why in the world would it work for her?

Because it’s a winning ticket & it would bring politics as a true democratic representation. I only say Palin at the top because the health care bill as current law needs to be repealed. And Hillary cares about health care (I think I heard that somewhere) so as a Republican and a Democrat, they can sit down as one and hash it out….like normal people do.

MiddleRoader said:
I just saw tonight where he said in retrospect it wasn’t a good idea.

See, that’s really all Palin had to do was take the high road.

The rest of your post was crap.

Manchin also missed 2 key votes or at least 1 while he was tending a party. Manchin has no room to talk about going back when it comes to voting on legislation.

Newsjunky said:
OPINION. Do you know what that is?

Of course Michelle does. She spouts her idiotic opinions off every day on here.

I see alot of comments from you libs telling those who don’t agree with you to leave. Poor John, begs the higher-ups daily to ban me because I won’t stop pointing out his lies. Well I think I speak for all my conservatives in arms (I can say that right?) that we ain’t goin anywhere so get over it! We will be here every single day to point on your lies and hypocrisy. Buckly up!

WCinWI said:
like normal people do.

Then that leaves Poor,poor Palin out in the cold again.Tsk,tsk such a victim.

WCinWI said:
Manchin also missed 2 key votes or at least 1 while he was tending a party.

And Boehner turned down a seat on Air Force One to the Arizona shooting victims memorial to attend a cocktail party. Then he turned down an invitation to a dinner and meeting with the President of China. Yeah, he really has the national interest in mind.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
I see alot of comments from you libs telling those who don’t agree with you to leave. Poor John, begs the higher-ups daily to ban me because I won’t stop pointing out his lies. Well I think I speak for all my conservatives in arms (I can say that right?) that we ain’t goin anywhere so get over it! We will be here every single day to point on your lies and hypocrisy. Buckly up!

No one told anyone to leave except you. The others decided to leave on their own. Example of how you do not tell the truth.

WCinWI said:
You do realize that Drudge is only a group of site links and not a blog right? :) Hotair is the conservative place to be.

Oh…and about that whole calling out someone for vitriol….not cool when you just posted your own vitriolic rant.

I only pointed out the paradox. I know I posted my own vitriolic rant, but, I never said you (or anyone else) should not do it. I didn’t call anyone out for vitriol in this thread, he did. I am not being a hypocrite. He’s calling out the left (+Martel) for “vitriol” while engaging in it. That is hypocrisy.

I have only been to Sludge’s main page. I assumed it’s just setup the way HuffPo is. “My bad.” :)

the real john t said:
And Boehner turned down a seat on Air Force One to the Arizona shooting victims memorial to attend a cocktail party. Then he turned down an invitation to a dinner and meeting with the President of China. Yeah, he really has the national interest in mind.

From my understanding, he was attending the House prayer vigils concerning the shooting.

Also, Debbie Wasserman Schulz attended (as a friend of Giffords, of course) and she is one of the most partisan Democrats that constantly attacks (in a rude way) Republicans so I don’t think that the D’s have a lot of legs to stand on concerning this matter.

BTW, I’ve seen livid women. Palin isn’t livid. Trust me, I know about these things.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
I see alot of comments from you libs telling those who don’t agree with you to leave

Has nothing to do with agree or disagree. Your conservatives in arm bitch about Mediaite so much. Don’t come here to comment is all they are suggesting.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
I see alot of comments from you libs telling those who don’t agree with you to leave. Poor John, begs the higher-ups daily to ban me because I won’t stop pointing out his lies. Well I think I speak for all my conservatives in arms (I can say that right?) that we ain’t goin anywhere so get over it! We will be here every single day to point on your lies and hypocrisy. Buckly up!

You have never proven anything on here except your ignorance. And it’s not the liberals on here that keep bitching and moaning about this site. It’s you crybaby RWers.

Pablo said:
BTW, I’ve seen livid women. Palin isn’t livid. Trust me, I know about these things.

I do have to agree with you on that one.

John says:

You have never proven anything on here except your ignorance

Says the guy I have to correct often.

WCinWI said:
Manchin also missed 2 key votes or at least 1 while he was tending a party. Manchin has no room to talk about going back when it comes to voting on legislation.

Hey, that’s the guy who had a campaign commercial where he picked up a rifle and fired a round through the Cap and Tax bill, isn’t it?

Between an Alzheimer-ridden Reagan to a Jesus-consulting Bush to the narcissistic Palin, what is it about the modern-day Republican that they enjoy supporting leaders who aren’t quite right in the head? If only Caligula could had waited to be a GOP front runner, he wouldn’t have seem perfectly sensible to a good number of Republicans.

BTW, it’s rich that the UNEMPLOYED QUITTER is complaining about Congress needing to get back to work.

Pablo said:
Hey, that’s the guy who had a campaign commercial where he picked up a rifle and fired a round through the Cap and Tax bill, isn’t it?

Yes and he took the high road and said in retrospect he shouldn’t have done that.

Pablo said:
BTW, I’ve seen livid women. Palin isn’t livid. Trust me, I know about these things.

But she is in your secret fantasies of her where she tells you toshut up and call her your Grizzly Mama. Now that’s “livid”.

Newsjunky said:
OPINION. Do you know what that is?

That means it’s not journalism, right? What do I win?

A Kim Bo said:
But she is in your secret fantasies of her where she tells you toshut up and call her your Grizzly Mama. Now that’s “livid”.

Actually, that’s much more in line with your fantasy, homeboy. Nice projector you’ve got there, though.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
I see alot of comments from you libs telling those who don’t agree with you to leave.

That’s a canard. I guess I’m one of those “liberals” you are talking about. I honestly ENJOY battling with you wingnuts. I truly do. I actually love engaging with people who I disagree with. What I don’t like however, is whiners. I hate people who complain, bitch, bleet and moan. Let’s discuss the issues but stop whining about how the author of the piece didn’t say this or said this…and other bullcrap. You conservatives here do it ALL the time and it’s tiresome. So, to the “whiners” (like you) if Mediate sucks so bad, why do you return? You can simply….leave. It’s like the little kid in the playground screaming “look at me…look at me” and nobody paying attention to the little brat. At some point, the kid stops yapping, or goes to another playground but surely doesn’t do the same thing day after day and week after week. You want to discuss issues, let’s do that but keep the kvetching to a minimum.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Well I think I speak for all my conservatives in arms

I doubt that a lot of conservatives would agree with you on that. There’s a lot of smart conservatives that would take offense to an ignorant idiot saying she speaks for all of them.

MiddleRoader said:
Yes and he took the high road and said in retrospect he shouldn’t have done that.

Now if only Palin could take a cue from him. But, then again, Manchin actually has a JOB to do and a responsibility to a constituency, Palin has more ethnic groups to tick off and a responsibility to her ego.

MiddleRoader said:
Yes and he took the high road and said in retrospect he shouldn’t have done that.

Why would someone apologize for something if it had nothing to do with someone’s mental illness? There is no connection.

Palin’s talked highly about Manchin. Manchin’s a moderate, hence all the guns. Conservatives could get to like a Manchin.

2 things, first, when Manchin made that stupid ad he wasn’t trying to appeal to Liberals and second, a Liberal blogger referred to Palin’s original video response as her Pettysburg Address! Spot on. Now, she’s come back with more of the same? I don’t know how her “fans” and that’s what they are, keep defending her. This was more cringe inducing embarrassment. She will be mocked and criticized again tomorrow. Pass the popcorn!

Gee, nice preamble there Frances Martel.
Straight to the point, upon reading what you’ve written, it’s pretty easy to see that you’re a very happily ignorant person and you hate Palin’s guts, so why not save yourself an hour and skip all the gibberish you wrote and just post “I hate Sarah Palin’s guts…here watch this video”?
Or do you get paid by the word with an extra bonus for each slam against Palin you can come up with?

WCinWI said:
And Hillary cares about health care (I think I heard that somewhere

And, as such, Palin thinks that Hillary, too is an evil socialist so that should make for an interesting “team”. Face it, Palin isn’t fit to shine Hillary’s shoes.

Gasket said:
That’s a canard. I guess I’m one of those “liberals” you are talking about. I honestly ENJOY battling with you wingnuts. I truly do. I actually love engaging with people who I disagree with. What I don’t like however, is whiners. I hate people who complain, bitch, bleet and moan. Let’s discuss the issues but stop whining about how the author of the piece didn’t say this or said this…and other bullcrap. You conservatives here do it ALL the time and it’s tiresome. So, to the “whiners” (like you) if Mediate sucks so bad, why do you return? You can simply….leave. It’s like the little kid in the playground screaming “look at me…look at me” and nobody paying attention to the little brat. At some point, the kid stops yapping, or goes to another playground but surely doesn’t do the same thing day after day and week after week. You want to discuss issues, let’s do that but keep the kvetching to a minimum.

Ok….if you want discussion. Then discuss health care. Why is the current law so great?

Pablo said:
BTW, I’ve seen livid women. Palin isn’t livid. Trust me, I know about these things.

I agree.

WCinWI said:
Why would someone apologize for something if it had nothing to do with someone’s mental illness? There is no connection. Palin’s talked highly about Manchin. Manchin’s a moderate, hence all the guns. Conservatives could get to like a Manchin.

he didn’t apologize. he just made a statement that in retrospect he shouldn’t have used that. see, two different things. i don’t think Palin should have apologized. but she could have said something to the effect he did. really not that hard. but her silence is what did her in and then making her two appearances about her and barely mention the victims.

roxsteady said:
2 things, first, when Manchin made that stupid ad he wasn’t trying to appeal to Liberals

Yeah, he was trying to appeal to his electorate. He seems to have done pretty well with that.

A Kim Bo said:
And, as such, Palin thinks that Hillary, too is an evil socialist so that should make for an interesting “team”. Face it, Palin isn’t fit to shine Hillary’s shoes.

This shall be my only post to you as you’re clearly a bot. Palin hasn’t to my knowledge made fun of Hillary. I think it would be a strong ticket. Let’s rock the political sphere and put something in the history books for women for once!

Now go practice yoga since you have a lot of pent up tension that you must get out with all of your negative posts.

OxyCon said:
Gee, nice preamble there Frances Martel.
Straight to the point, upon reading what you’ve written, it’s pretty easy to see that you’re a very happily ignorant person and you hate Palin’s guts,

Another little RWer that comes on just to bitch and moan about the site.

WCinWI said:
Why would someone apologize for something if it had nothing to do with someone’s mental illness? There is no connection. Palin’s talked highly about Manchin. Manchin’s a moderate, hence all the guns. Conservatives could get to like a Manchin.

Perhaps the better question is, why would someone remove a map with crosshairs from their facebook page if they weren’t at least acknowledging that it was in poor taste. Not responsible for the shooting, just in poor taste!

MiddleRoader said:
he didn’t apologize. he just made a statement that in retrospect he shouldn’t have used that. see, two different things. i don’t think Palin should have apologized. but she could have said something to the effect he did. really not that hard. but her silence is what did her in and then making her two appearances about her and barely mention the victims.

Yes. He used an actual gun. She picked out a district that could trend R. That’s the difference in it to me. If this guy wasn’t as apolitical (he seems to pick from all over, more lefty in my eyes) as he is, then there should be a discussion. However, this guy has other issues. It’s a mixture of premeditation & medical issues going on. The discussion should not be about what Palin or Obama needs to say to heal the nation, but what kind of care that we can provide for mentally handicapped people that might be unstable and a way for parents to be more proactive in this initiative.

Pablo said:
Yeah, he was trying to appeal to his electorate. He seems to have done pretty well with that.

He also did well with the apology!

WCinWI said:
Palin’s talked highly about Manchin. Manchin’s a moderate, hence all the guns. Conservatives could get to like a Manchin.

That’s right, Palin, as a conservative, loves her guns. In fact, the new motto of the GOP should be “we may not have any ideas but we sure as heck have lots of gun”. Maybe that’s the “2nd Amendment” remedy they’re talking about. Hate what’s going on in health care, education, energy policy, crime, and, of course, foreign policy just shoot first and ask questions later.

Cecelia said:
Oh sure…. Pres. Obama mentions criticism he’s received from Rush Limbaugh in two different speeches. Shirley Sherrod is fired because the Administration is so frightened of what Glenn Beck may say over a video.

Comon Cecelia ; there’s no real comparison there.

Cecelia said:
However, you have a week long mediapalooza linking Palin to a schizophrenic who shot sixteen people and after there’s no link found, she’s supposed to be non-solipsistic and say— I acknowledge your drift, media…. I’ll try to do better… After 10,000 google hits linking me with Loughner… it’s not about me…

As someone said, figure out how google works. Every thread that defends her would also come up under those search terms. Every thread that just commented on her map in passing, or mentioned she was being criticized would come up. So, saying those hits are blaming her is pure bullshit.

I agree she took some unfair heat but I don’t think it was as bad as it’s being painted. Discussing her map and the fact that Giffords was just speaking about it, is not blaming her. Posing the question of the possible effect of political rhetoric after something like this is also not blaming her.

MiddleRoader said:
i don’t think Palin should have apologized. but she could have said something to the effect he did.

Yeah, but why? She has nothing to apologize for, obviously. So why should she decry some dopey graphic on her PAC site, just because a gaggle of lunatics lost their minds over it? Does anyone with any sort of connection to reality really think that the crosshair graphic was incitement to violence? Of those who do (who I’d consider not in their right minds) how many of them think Sarah Palin put that graphic together and posted it? I’d bet that 100% of them would also tell you that every word she speaks, tweets or Facebooks is written for her.

roxsteady said:
Perhaps the better question is, why would someone remove a map with crosshairs from their facebook page if they weren’t at least acknowledging that it was in poor taste. Not responsible for the shooting, just in poor taste!

From my knowledge, she didn’t remove it. There were 2 maps – one on her PAC page & one on her facebook page. From my understanding, a site administrator removed it since the election cycle was over. Can I understand why people would wonder about the timing? Sure. But to be deranged over it? No.

WCinWI said:
Ok….if you want discussion. Then discuss health care. Why is the current law so great?

I don’t like the healthcare law as written. No cost controls, giveaways to big business (pharma, insurance companies..) and an individual mandate especially. I don’t like being forced to buy anything, including car insurance. Why would I like ACA? There are few provisions I like but the negatives outweigh them.

WCinWI said:
Palin hasn’t to my knowledge made fun of Hillary. I think it would be a strong ticket. Let’s rock the political sphere and put something in the history books for women for once!

The difference between Hillary and Palin is that Hillary is respected around the world. Palin is a joke around the world.

WCinWI said:
The discussion should not be about what Palin or Obama needs to say to heal the nation, but what kind of care that we can provide for mentally handicapped people that might be unstable and a way for parents to be more proactive in this initiative.

Well it’s good to know that the Right is FINALLY willing to have an honest discussion about health care in this country instead of John Boehner saying “we have the best health care in the world” (a statement that can’t be substantiated by any empirical evidence ANYWHERE and leaving it at that. Turns out that being talking about lack of care for those who need it doesn’t make you a Marxist, after all.

Pablo said:
BTW, I’ve seen livid women. Palin isn’t livid. Trust me, I know about these things.

I’d say livid is pretty inaccurate.

Gasket said:
I don’t like the healthcare law as written. No cost controls, giveaways to big business (pharma, insurance companies..) and an individual mandate especially. I don’t like being forced to buy anything, including car insurance. Why would I like ACA? There are few provisions I like but the negatives outweigh them.

Seems like you’d be for the Republican approach then.

Buying across state lines
No funding of abortions through proxy.
Tort reform (essentially, getting rid of some of the paperwork needed to cover a doctor’s butt)

I can understand car insurance as a conservative because it’s an option. You don’t have to drive.

WCinWI said:
From my knowledge, she didn’t remove it. There were 2 maps – one on her PAC page & one on her facebook page. From my understanding, a site administrator removed it since the election cycle was over. Can I understand why people would wonder about the timing? Sure. But to be deranged over it? No.

I think they tried to remove it, which was the right thing to do after the shooting, but realized it was all over the internet and they couldn’t really get rid of it.

the real john t said:

OxyCon said:
Gee, nice preamble there Frances Martel.
Straight to the point, upon reading what you’ve written, it’s pretty easy to see that you’re a very happily ignorant person and you hate Palin’s guts,

the real john t says:
January 18, 2011 at 12:45 am  (Quote)
0  9
Another little RWer that comes on just to bitch and moan about the site.

Another leftist troll that never adds anything to the debate, just attacks the commenters.

WCinWI said:
Yes. He used an actual gun. She picked out a district that could trend R. That’s the difference in it to me. If this guy wasn’t as apolitical (he seems to pick from all over, more lefty in my eyes) as he is, then there should be a discussion. However, this guy has other issues. It’s a mixture of premeditation & medical issues going on. The discussion should not be about what Palin or Obama needs to say to heal the nation, but what kind of care that we can provide for mentally handicapped people that might be unstable and a way for parents to be more proactive in this initiative.

I agree with you totally. this whole thing is more about mental illness than gun control or language/visuals.

But the point is after the media fucked up by laying blame. In my opinion as well as others all she had to do was address it. Look she took the map down and all she had to say that basically as he did ….in retrospect I have taken the map down as it may have not been the wisest of choices to use. You know these are my words but some thing to that affect. She would have came out looking a much better person. But number one she waited (aside from some facebook posting that more people than not did not see it) and then made it all about her after yes, she was crucified for 4 days. and then had to do it again tonight and in my opinion she failed again.

Sarah, maybe everyone can give you their wealth, just so that you will be quiet and stop complaining. Honey, some day you will actually decide to BE a Christian and stop pretending to be one. In the meantime, take the wealth of the USA and I hope that will satisfy you for a nano-second. Selfishness is NOT a virtue. I hope you are extremely happy while others starve!!!!

CosmosDan said:
Comon Cecelia ; there’s no real comparison there.

Yeah, there’s actually a connection between the people mentioned and the events being discussed. There is no comparison at all between these situations, except for the one Cecilia notes, which is an apt point when discussing public statements from national political figures.

So, saying those hits are blaming her is pure bullshit.

And who did that, Dan? Her point is that there is that much discussion in which she is linked with these shootings, despite the fact that she had exactly nothing to do with them until the left wing hyenas started howling. And now she’s forever linked to them, not because of any fault on her part, but because people who carry insane hatred for her couldn’t wait to find some blood to smear her with. So, facts be damned, some bodies hit the ground and they pulled the knives out on Palin. And Beck, and Limbaugh, and Angle, et al. But mostly and especially Palin.

We know who you are and we know what you’re doing. It isn’t going to work, so keep it up.

CosmosDan said:
I think they tried to remove it, which was the right thing to do after the shooting, but realized it was all over the internet and they couldn’t really get rid of it.

One of her aides said that whoever runs the PAC site alerted Palin’s team to the map being up and as to whether it should be brought down or not. Logic says elections are over so yes. Totally shoddy paperwork on this one. I agree to that. I just don’t believe in the other rhetoric against Palin. Take policy stances against her, but don’t criticize her because she has a job as a political commentator.

pxmcc said:
Sarah, maybe everyone can give you their wealth, just so that you will be quiet and stop complaining.

You go first, OK? Send all of your money here.

WCinWI said:
Let’s rock the political sphere and put something in the history books for women for once!

And let’s choose two people who could actually work together and pick the one as the leader who can actually carry on a conversation with her detractors and foreign leaders without getting their panties in a bunch. Sorry, but Sarah has shown nothing but antipathy for Hillary’s policies and only a fantasists would overlook that. They both have vaginas and that’s where the similarities end.

WCinWI said:
Now go practice yoga since you have a lot of pent up tension that you must get out with all of your negative posts.

Now go shoot a gun since you have a lot of pent up sexual tension as evidence by your recurring fantasy three way with Palin and Hillary.

Pablo said:
Yeah, but why? She has nothing to apologize for, obviously. So why should she decry some dopey graphic on her PAC site, just because a gaggle of lunatics lost their minds over it? Does anyone with any sort of connection to reality really think that the crosshair graphic was incitement to violence? Of those who do (who I’d consider not in their right minds) how many of them think Sarah Palin put that graphic together and posted it? I’d bet that 100% of them would also tell you that every word she speaks, tweets or Facebooks is written for her.

It’s called class. Now, Pablo, did you not give me her posting on Facebook that she supposedly made about her hearfelt sadness of the tragedy? And I was suppose to believe she did that, right?

Pablo said:
And who did that, Dan?

Hannity did.

OxyCon said:
Another leftist troll that never adds anything to the debate,

Where in your comment did you add anything to the debate except your hatred for the author of it?

Palin was attacked. The attack, cruel, unfounded and fraudulent. The Blood Libel comparison she used was accurate, well stated and just as well delivered as any teleprompter message ever delivered by Obama. Rabbi’s have confirmed the use of Blood Libel was appropriate. http://tinyurl.com/6dpdxv8 A teleprompter was a wise choice given the importance of the statement, and the use of writers was also wise. Reasonable people who actually watched the message know she was not focused on herself, and that it was completely appropriate. All the noise (objecting to it) simply illustrates to reasonable people that there is something deeply wrong with our brothers on the left. May God have mercy on their demented souls.

WCinWI said:
Logic says elections are over so yes.

Oh come on? I know you’re smarter than this. You can’t possibly be using this as the reason it was taken down?

A Kim Bo said:
And let’s choose two people who could actually work together and pick the one as the leader who can actually carry on a conversation with her detractors and foreign leaders without getting their panties in a bunch.

Amen.

Maliheh said:
I wonder if sarah is still planning that trip to Israel| to explain her blood libel comment…as in no surprise we all knew she would pull the victim card

She obviously didn’t know what it means. She said she saw it in a Washington Post column and borrowed it without really knowing what it meant or where it was most heinously utilized. It just sounded good, just like “don’t retreat, reload” and “lame stream media” sounds GOOD to her sycophantic fans whether they make any sense or at all sensible or not.

She can’t keep spewing willfully ignorant talking points or using irresponsible images and then blame it on someone else, especially someone else in her own camp. If she can’t control her own rhetoric, then she’s not fit to lead.

MiddleRoader said:
Hannity did.

I’ve watched it twice and apparently missed that. Quote?

Pablo said:
Amen.

LOL

MiddleRoader said:
Oh come on? I know you’re smarter than this. You can’t possibly be using this as the reason it was taken down?

It’s called the Sarah Palin Shift Blame of the Week. Don’t worry, there will be more to come as equally inane as this one.

Pablo said:
I’ve watched it twice and apparently missed that. Quote?

So I didn’t hear him tell her he googled her and came up with 10,000 hits linking her with the shooting? I believe I did.

rather your an liberal or conservative,the fact is that sarah palin has the blood of an 9 year old on her hands in arizona named christine green

A Kim Bo said:
She obviously didn’t know what it means.

She said it’s a false accusation of having blood on your hands. Alan Dershowitz and Abe Foxman, among many others, fully understood her.

Why don’t you tell us what it means, Kimmie? What do you know about the term “blood libel” that Alan Dershowitz doesn’t?

Maliheh said:
rather your an liberal or conservative,the fact is that sarah palin has the blood of an 9 year old on her hands in arizona named christine green

And, thank you for the timely blood libel. Feel free to drop dead, and I mean that in the most politically correct way possible, as that’s how these things should be done.

WHarropson said:
The Blood Libel comparison she used was accurate,

Yeah right, since Giffords is Jewish. You idiot.

Maliheh said:
rather your an liberal or conservative,the fact is that sarah palin has the blood of an 9 year old on her hands in arizona named christine green

Hope and Change .

Yes we can .

TangledThorns said:
Good for Sarah, she is truly inspiring in these awful times.

Yes, she proves time and again that no matter how bad things are, that Sarah can find a way to make a bad thing worse for her own twisted egotistical needs.

MiddleRoader said:
So I didn’t hear him tell her he googled her and came up with 10,000 hits linking her with the shooting? I believe I did.

That’s not the same thing as saying that all of those links blamed her for it, which is what Dan was asking about. There’s an awful lot of conversation about her vis a vis the shooting, including this thread. That’s the point.

Pablo said:
There’s an awful lot of conversation about her vis a vis the shooting, including this thread. That’s the point.

And she’s loving it, especially since Willow’s not yet old enough to be whored out on a reality show yet and, thus, the Palin brand has gone dormant.

xtranormal said:
Hope and Change .

I’ll take hopey changey over bloody libelly any day of the week.

A Kim Bo said:
I’ll take hopey changey over bloody libelly any day of the week

Obama will give us all free food .

MiddleRoader said:
So I didn’t hear him tell her he googled her and came up with 10,000 hits linking her with the shooting? I believe I did.

No, you heard him say Tuscon shooting…..in general.

Pablo said:
That’s not the same thing as saying that all of those links blamed her for it, which is what Dan was asking about. There’s an awful lot of conversation about her vis a vis the shooting, including this thread. That’s the point.

Yes he did imply that. He said he googled her name and something about the shooting (sorry I can’t remember the specifics and don’t make me watch it again) and he came up with 10,000 hits linking or blaming her. You asked for a quote I gave it to you the best I could at the moment. Watch the interview again if its that important.

WCinWI said:
No, you heard him say Tuscon shooting…..in general.

Watch it again…

xtranormal said:
Obama will give us all free food .

You probably wouldn’t take it anyway. You like the dumpster you eat out of too well.

MiddleRoader said:
Oh come on? I know you’re smarter than this. You can’t possibly be using this as the reason it was taken down?

I tend to take what actual aides say as more legit than bloggers. So sorry. I already said that it wasn’t the best move. Now what specific Palin policy move do you have an issue with? Also, if Palin had mentioned Giffords, woudl it have been a 10/10 speech? That seemed to be your only negative mentioned.

A Kim Bo said:
And she’s loving it, especially since Willow’s not yet old enough to be whored out on a reality show yet and, thus, the Palin brand has gone dormant.

Yeah, I’m sure she adores being accused of being an accessory to and the inspiration for the murders of 6 innocent people, including an absolutely beautiful 9 year old girl. Has anyone ever told you that you’re a sick piece of shit? Get help, now.

Pablo said:
She said it’s a false accusation of having blood on your hands

She said she read it on a WaPo column and it sounded good to her. She answered the question on Hannity with the “obviously” it means such and such which only reveals that OBVIOUSLY she just learned what it really means.

Face it, just like her speech writer didn’t know what it meant and another aide was responsible for the map with the crosshairs coming down, she’s forever trying to pawn off her failures and poor rhetorical choices on someone else. And I thought REAL CONSERVATIVES believed in personal accountability. It’s a good thing no one will ever accuse her of being a real conservative no matter how many guns she owns.

the real john t said:
You probably wouldn’t take it anyway. You like the dumpster you eat out of too well.

I see you’re at the top of your game tonight, john. Good times, huh?

MiddleRoader said:
Watch it again…

I did. Perhaps you should re-watch it. It comes in at about 1:13. :)

MiddleRoader said:
Yes he did imply that.

Quote?

Pablo said:
Yeah, I’m sure she adores being accused of being an accessory to and the inspiration for the murders of 6 innocent people

And I’m sure her own children enjoy being accessories to her increasingly wayward political ambitions.

Pablo said:
Has anyone ever told you that you’re a sick piece of shit? Get help, now.

Has anyone ever told you that you have an unhealthy obsession with Sarah Palin. Get a room, now.

Pablo said:
What do you know about the term “blood libel

Ummm.. That maybe poor,poor victim Palin shouldn’t have used it.

the real john t said:
You probably wouldn’t take it anyway. You like the dumpster you eat out of too well.

You spread hate . I will report you to campus police for hate speech .

I want the Hope , and the Change .

Pablo said:
And who did that, Dan? Her point is that there is that much discussion in which she is linked with these shootings,

Just as I said. I know there were some jackasses out there assigned blame to her Beck, etc, when none was warranted, but discussing her map, Giffords mentioning it not long before, or the possible connection of political rhetoric to the shootings, is not blaming her. It’s just the news cycle.

If Hannity meant linked in a much more abstract way, as in, even mentioned in any way at all, then it was a pointless thing to bring up.

the real john t said:

OxyCon said:
Another leftist troll that never adds anything to the debate,

the real john t says:
January 18, 2011 at 1:04 am  (Quote)
1  11
Where in your comment did you add anything to the debate except your hatred for the author of it?

I concisely summed up the author’s work so that many of the low intelligence readers here can understand the gist of it. So you see, I perform quite a good service for the mostly liberal Mediaite readers.

What I gt from the interview is that Palin was clearly upset and you could actually see it (I would be too if someone accused me of murder and I had nothing to do with it). I really don’t think the critique of her playing the victim here is totally fair. Listen, you had an entire group of people inject Palin into the story, and you’re mad when she decides to defend herself? What was she supposed to do, shut up and take it?

Palin was not the one who moved the focus, her critics did. Do I think it was worth it for Palin to respond? In the short run no and in long run we don’t know yet, but this argument to try and blame Palin for the shooting is dead and done.

WCinWI said:
Seems like you’d be for the Republican approach then.

Buying across state lines
No funding of abortions through proxy.
Tort reform (essentially, getting rid of some of the paperwork needed to cover a doctor’s butt)

I can understand car insurance as a conservative because it’s an option. You don’t have to drive.

No problem with inter-state competition here. I don’t like monopolies, which most insurance carriers (health) are. I also agree with tort reform. Don’t care for the inclusion of abortion into the debate. I have libertarian tendencies and don’t like dictating to anyone what part of their health should be covered and what part should not. Abortion is legal in this country (and I’m pro-choice) so I don’t care how it’s paid for. There are many other things that I disagree with where my tax money is spent on but I don’t go into convulsions about it. I understand what taxation is about. Just being a pragmatist here.

About the car insurance stuff, I don’t get the option to “opt out” of road taxes if I don’t drive, do I? I shouldn’t then be forced to buy insurance. What if I want to set up my own personal car expenses account and use that as an insurance? I can’t really do it but have to purchase a service from the insurance cartel. I should be responsible for my mistakes….right? Let me take care of my business. It’s the epitome of personal responsibility. I have always believed car insurance should be optional, not mandatory. Car insurance companies are crooks. I really do hate them…ha.

Maliheh said:
rather your an liberal or conservative,the fact is that sarah palin has the blood of an 9 year old on her hands in arizona named christine green

No that’s not a fact at all. It’s the opposite of a fact.

WCinWI said:
I tend to take what actual aides say as more legit than bloggers.

And I tend to blame aides for my major f-ups just like Sarah Palin does. BTW, the aides that helped her prepare for her debate with Biden in 2008 now say that she was hopelessly unprepared and uneducated about basic facts. You’re right, in this instance we should believe words of AIDES. Especially those no longer on her payroll and who have nothing to lose.

CosmosDan said:
Just as I said. I know there were some jackasses out there assigned blame to her Beck, etc, when none was warranted, but discussing her map, Giffords mentioning it not long before, or the possible connection of political rhetoric to the shootings, is not blaming her. It’s just the news cycle.

If Hannity meant linked in a much more abstract way, as in, even mentioned in any way at all, then it was a pointless thing to bring up.

Giffords talked about the map on MSNBC back in like March of last year. That’s long enough away. Also, if she felt personally attacked, then she seems like a sensible enough person to call up Palin and ask her to remove it.

WCinWI said:
I tend to take what actual aides say as more legit than bloggers. So sorry. I already said that it wasn’t the best move. Now what specific Palin policy move do you have an issue with? Also, if Palin had mentioned Giffords, woudl it have been a 10/10 speech? That seemed to be your only negative mentioned.

I have an issue that she has not brought forth any policy moves.

Yes, about the speech.

To be honest, I don’t like her. I don’t think she would be good for this country. Not yet anyway. I can’t speak to sometime in the future, but at this point I have my doubts because she gives off the impression it’s more about staying in the spot light rather than getting down to business.

Also, as far as Obama went. I liked him, but I didn’t think he was ready yet either. And I can’t say I am totally dissapointed in him, although I think he made a huge mistake by focusing first on healthcare instead of the economy. I’m sure people without jobs are more concerned about getting back to work and eating/feeding their families than about healthcare at this point. Although, I know why he did it when he did it. And that’s politics. Wasn’t much I could do about it.

sarah Palin got mad on sean hannity because someone doubted her knowledge of the term “blood libel.” I question if she reads at grade level sometimes.

A Kim Bo said:
Has anyone ever told you that you have an unhealthy obsession with Sarah Palin. Get a room, now.

Wait, wait, wait…. I have an unhealthy obsession with Sarah Palin? I’m playing political culture wonk at Mediaite, which tends to be my wont.

A Kim Bo said:
And she’s loving it, especially since Willow’s not yet old enough to be whored out on a reality show yet and, thus, the Palin brand has gone dormant.

You are a sick son of a bitch, with an UNHEALTHY Sarah Palin obsession. Really, get help.

Gasket said:
No problem with inter-state competition here. I don’t like monopolies, which most insurance carriers (health) are. I also agree with tort reform. Don’t care for the inclusion of abortion into the debate. I have libertarian tendencies and don’t like dictating to anyone what part of their health should be covered and what part should not. Abortion is legal in this country (and I’m pro-choice) so I don’t care how it’s paid for. There are many other things that I disagree with where my tax money is spent on but I don’t go into convulsions about it. I understand what taxation is about. Just being a pragmatist here.

About the car insurance stuff, I don’t get the option to “opt out” of road taxes if I don’t drive, do I? I shouldn’t then be forced to buy insurance. What if I want to set up my own personal car expenses account and use that as an insurance? I can’t really do it but have to purchase a service from the insurance cartel. I should be responsible for my mistakes….right? Let me take care of my business. It’s the epitome of personal responsibility. I have always believed car insurance should be optional, not mandatory. Car insurance companies are crooks. I really do hate them…ha.

I’m Pro-Life, but I tend to be a pragmatist too (sometimes..haha). I only meant abortion talk as it applied to any federal monies in general. I have a problem with Federal dollars of any sort being allocated to someone’s choice that is not my own. At least when it comes to the subject of murder. Harsh term, I know. But it’s true.

As far as your car tax talk, I totally get where you’re coming from. But the legal side of me is telling me that if you make personal accounts for cars, you’re gonna have A LOT of lawsuits with an already overburdened legal system. That and I do believe that some taxes should be allocated at the state level for road taxes. I don’t like when federal monies are attached to road projects.

Jackyboy said:
What I gt from the interview is that Palin was clearly upset and you could actually see it (I would be too if someone accused me of murder and I had nothing to do with it).

I don’t recall anyone accusing Palin of mudrer. And yes she should have just shut the hell up. She just keeps digging herself a deeper hole with her “I’m the victim” rhetoric.

xtranormal said:
Obama will give us all free food .

And Palin will give us all free guns to go shoot our food with. Or any political enemies if we see fit.

Kim Bo, you are a hate filled pathetic blind sack of Siberian Sheep Sh..

The woman accepted an invitation to answer questions on a show. A woman that is the former Governor of Alaska. A woman that ran for VP of the USA, and literally pulled McCain numbers up to something viable when she was chosen. HE was the anchor of doom in that election….proven unelectable in the past. A freaking schizo Rhino.
She was fine , articulate, and spoke for the Tucson event as the focus…not her. Hannity simply questioned her as to her perspective and reaction to it all. She was gracious and concerned and focused. Pelosi with her filthy unwashed hair is never able to communicate or make a shred of logic and is barf for a role model. Hillary is a Marxist Dragonista.
Go eat glass or something equally self abusive that is relevant to your psychotic state of mind. Sara Palin is really none of your business and your frenzy here should carefully be monitored as threating to her.

WCinWI said:
Giffords talked about the map on MSNBC back in like March of last year.

Her real crime was not be able to offer an acceptable answer to the question “What is government if words have no meaning?” Acceptable to a madman, that is.

Maliheh said:
sarah Palin got mad on sean hannity because someone doubted her knowledge of the term “blood libel.” I question if she reads at grade level sometimes.

That is what MoveOn.org says , and what I learned on The View and the Rachel Maddow Show.

A Kim Bo said:
And Palin will give us all free guns to go shoot our food with. Or any political enemies if we see fit.

Sorry, Bunky, you’ll have to buy your own gun. And God willing, you’re on a mental health watch list that will preclude you from doing that.

A Kim Bo said:
And Palin will give us all free guns to go shoot our food with. Or any political enemies if we see fit.

I don’t care .

Obama will pay my mortage.

Jackyboy said:
Jackyboy says:
January 18, 2011 at 1:31 am  (Quote)
3  0
What I gt from the interview is that Palin was clearly upset and you could actually see it (I would be too if someone accused me of murder and I had nothing to do with it). I really don’t think the critique of her playing the victim here is totally fair. Listen, you had an entire group of people inject Palin into the story, and you’re mad when she decides to defend herself? What was she supposed to do, shut up and take it?

Palin was not the one who moved the focus, her critics did. Do I think it was worth it for Palin to respond? In the short run no and in long run we don’t know yet, but this argument to try and blame Palin for the shooting is dead and done.

Jacky, what’s going on here is the American media is dead set upon destroying Sarah Palin. They want her to shut up and go away forever. This is why each week they find something ridiculous with which to impugn her character and to throw red meat to the far-left trolls so they can frenzy feed on hatred.

Welcome to the McCarthyism of the Democrat-media complex.

MiddleRoader said:
she gives off the impression it’s more about staying in the spot light rather than getting down to business.

She sees the White House as another reality TV opportunity. You know, another attempt to use the “lame stream media” to criticize the “lame stream media”.

MiddleRoader said:
I have an issue that she has not brought forth any policy moves.

Yes, about the speech.

To be honest, I don’t like her. I don’t think she would be good for this country. Not yet anyway. I can’t speak to sometime in the future, but at this point I have my doubts because she gives off the impression it’s more about staying in the spot light rather than getting down to business.

Also, as far as Obama went. I liked him, but I didn’t think he was ready yet either. And I can’t say I am totally dissapointed in him, although I think he made a huge mistake by focusing first on healthcare instead of the economy. I’m sure people without jobs are more concerned about getting back to work and eating/feeding their families than about healthcare at this point. Although, I know why he did it when he did it. And that’s politics. Wasn’t much I could do about it.

Ok…Palin in a somewhat nutshell:

The gays love her…conservative gays that is.
She wouldn’t have voted for the START Treaty.
She doesn’t like the health care bill….AT ALL.
She would’ve extended the Bush tax rates for eternity.
She’s Pro-Life.
She would be drilling or efficiently putting the paperwork and people in place to make that happen years from now.
And she’d probably tackle social security along with jobs.
Oh and she’s strict on immigration…to a point. I think she wants a guest worker program or at least would be reasonable about the fact that there are people here.

Anything else you’d care to know? :)

OxyCon said:
what’s going on here is the American media is dead set upon destroying Sarah Palin

You mean the same lame stream media that MADE HER? Sorry Sarah doesn’t need to media to destroy her career. She does an excellent job of doing so herself.

Real John,

She did not make any false claims and quoted exactly what had been said about all conservatives on radio and tv. There is NOTHING wrong with the Tea Party and its endeavors. There is no reason for her to shut up and NOTHING she stated dug a hole. You are just a stupid liberal that won’t listen to your stupid messiah that says you should stop with the hate rhetoric. You all are ignoring the map with target bullseyes that were used by the Jackass Party during elections. You are pathetic.

A Kim Bo said:

OxyCon said:
what’s going on here is the American media is dead set upon destroying Sarah Palin

A Kim Bo says:
January 18, 2011 at 1:44 am  (Quote)
0  4
You mean the same lame stream media that MADE HER? Sorry Sarah doesn’t need to media to destroy her career. She does an excellent job of doing so herself.

She made herself.
And, Obama wouldn’t have survived 5 minutes under the same negative media barrage Palin has endured for 2 plus years.

ditchamerica said:
Pelosi with her filthy unwashed hair is never able to communicate or make a shred of logic and is barf for a role model. Hillary is a Marxist Dragonista.
Go eat glass or something equally self abusive that is relevant to your psychotic state of mind. Sara Palin is really none of your business and your frenzy here should carefully be monitored as threating to her.

But yet in your comment you attack Pelosi and Hillary Clinton. Do you know what a hypocrite is?

OxyCon said:
She made herself.
And, Obama wouldn’t have survived 5 minutes under the same negative media barrage Palin has endured for 2 plus years.

Yes, the media circled the wagons and protected Obama.

A Kim Bo said:
She sees the White House as another reality TV opportunity. You know, another attempt to use the “lame stream media” to criticize the “lame stream media”.

Wow, so that’s why the lunatic left turned the klieg lights on her after a tragedy completely unconnected to her! Y’all want her on TV more.

A Kim Bo said:
She sees the White House as another reality TV opportunity. You know, another attempt to use the “lame stream media” to criticize the “lame stream media”.

The Right Wingers are the problem . That is what Keith Olbermann tells me . They are the problem and they watch Fox News.

WCinWI said:
I did. Perhaps you should re-watch it. It comes in at about 1:13. :)

Is it the full interview or just a clip? And I really don’t want to watch it again. I watched it when it was
on Hannity the full interview and I know what I heard. So I’m not going back.

A Kim Bo said:
And I tend to blame aides for my major f-ups just like Sarah Palin does. BTW, the aides that helped her prepare for her debate with Biden in 2008 now say that she was hopelessly unprepared and uneducated about basic facts. You’re right, in this instance we should believe words of AIDES. Especially those no longer on her payroll and who have nothing to lose.

Sarah Palin’s media strategy of “I’m rubber, you’re glue” does not appear to be working. Time for sarah palin to unleash “I know you are, but what am I?”

OxyCon said:
She made herself.
And, Obama wouldn’t have survived 5 minutes under the same negative media barrage Palin has endured for 2 plus years.

If the LA Times had tape of Sarah Palin feting Rashid Khalidi, do you think we would have seen it by now? If only the media spent less time powdering Obama’s ass than Palin spends powdering her nose…

ditchamerica said:
You are just a stupid liberal that won’t listen to your stupid messiah that says you should stop with the hate rhetoric.

And you are a stupid RWer that hangs on every word Palin says and worships the stupid idiot at the alter.

the real john t said:
I don’t recall anyone accusing Palin of mudrer. And yes she should have just shut the hell up. She just keeps digging herself a deeper hole with her “I’m the victim” rhetoric.

Have you been living under a rock for the past week?

ditchamerica said:
HE was the anchor of doom in that election….proven unelectable in the past. A freaking schizo Rhino

Gee, whose the hate-filled one here?

BTW, I thought Palin said he was a MAVERICK and A HERO. But if that translates to” freaking schizon Rhino” to you then I don’t blame you. As we’ve now seen, Palin can’t be taken at her word especially when she doesn’t really know what she is talking about anyway. Who can hold Sarah accountable for the words she speaks when she didn’t author them in the first place?

ditchamerica said:
She was fine , articulate, and spoke for the Tucson event as the focus

Which is why she YET AGAIN gave a statement, this time to her favorite lapdog, Sean Hannity, where she AGAIN ignored any discussion of the actual victims to focus entirely on herself. But I’m sure that eventually she’ll just blame some paid lackey for her insensitivity.

ditchamerica said:
Pelosi with her filthy unwashed hair is never able to communicate or make a shred of logic and is barf for a role model. Hillary is a Marxist Dragonista.

Gee, again whose the HATE-FILLED ONE, here? Sarah’s just mad that the only female politicians who give her the time of day are the losers that helped the GOP lose the Senate like O’Donnell and Angle. She’s only slightly less witchy and angry as those two.

ditchamerica said:
Go eat glass or something equally self abusive that is relevant to your psychotic state of mind

Go have a circle jerk over Palin elsewhere, the adults are talking here.

ditchamerica said:
Sara Palin is really none of your business and your frenzy here should carefully be monitored as threating to her.

Sorry, Sarah wants to be MY PRESIDENT, too. Even though I live in the part of the country she wouldn’t call the REAL AMERICA. Which is ironic, we were REAL ENOUGH for her and her state to take funds from when she led the biggest welfare state in the country, Alaska.

WCinWI said:
Giffords talked about the map on MSNBC back in like March of last year. That’s long enough away. Also, if she felt personally attacked, then she seems like a sensible enough person to call up Palin and ask her to remove it.

Mentioning it om national TV wasn’t enough?

MiddleRoader said:
I have an issue that she has not brought forth any policy moves.

You’re not paying attention. She’s written for both WaPo and the WSJ on issues, and she’s written plenty more on Facebook. She is very much on the record on a variety of issues. It’s all readily available if you care to find it.

CosmosDan said:
Mentioning it om national TV wasn’t enough?

Enough to do what? Stop Jared Loughner?

I think Hannity set her up.

MiddleRoader said:
Is it the full interview or just a clip? And I really don’t want to watch it again. I watched it when it was
on Hannity the full interview and I know what I heard. So I’m not going back.

It’s the one that’s attached to this article. You don’t have to re-watch it. You can just know that it was Sarah Palin & Tucson shooting. That’s good enough for me. :)

Real John,

Fact: Pelosi’s hair hasn’t been washed in months….that is apparent. Hillary Clinton is an avowed follower of Gramci theory , a Marxist. Facts, not hypocrisy. I observe the filthy hair, and have researched Hilary’s political roots.

A Kim Bo said:
Which is why she YET AGAIN gave a statement, this time to her favorite lapdog, Sean Hannity, where she AGAIN ignored any discussion of the actual victims to focus entirely on herself.

So, you missed the first five minutes, did you?

Jackyboy said:
Have you been living under a rock for the past week?

Why don’t you tell me who has accused Plain of murder. And be specific with proof.

WCinWI said:
Ok…Palin in a somewhat nutshell: The gays love her…conservative gays that is.She wouldn’t have voted for the START Treaty.She doesn’t like the health care bill….AT ALL.She would’ve extended the Bush tax rates for eternity.She’s Pro-Life.She would be drilling or efficiently putting the paperwork and people in place to make that happen years from now.And she’d probably tackle social security along with jobs.Oh and she’s strict on immigration…to a point. I think she wants a guest worker program or at least would be reasonable about the fact that there are people here. Anything else you’d care to know? :)

No that’s more than enough.

Maybe the gays you know, but not the ones I know.

Start treaty I don’t have a problem with.

Healthcare bill, I’m on the fence about.

I think we need to get away from our dependance on oil.

When you say tackle SS, how do you mean?

I don’t have a problem with the Bush tax cuts as long as the Republicans create more jobs, a lot more jobs. I have my doubts that will happen. But I never thought that taxing the rich, so to speak would ever fly even when Obama campaiged on that.

I’m pro choice.

Plain > Palin

Pablo said:
If the LA Times had tape of Sarah Palin feting Rashid Khalidi,

Especially since Sarah can’t even pronounce Rashid Khalidi without days worth of coaching. BTW, even John McCain, who provided $500,000 to Rashid Khalidi’s organization, doesn’t think that just because someone has a MUSLIM-Y sounding name, that we should all be frightened of them.

Pablo said:
Palin spends powdering her nose…

So now you’re blaming Palin’s insensitivity and narcissism to cocaine? Well, selfish lack of awareness is a trademark of cokeheads. It makes more sense than blaming her aides.

Pablo said:
So, you missed the first five minutes, did you?

Pablo, seriously, she did a crappy job of it. Those first 5 minutes.

Each of you claiming Sara is angry and upset in this interview. You are dumber than dirt.
There is no inkling of anger. All of her comments were calm and thoughtful and in her usual tone. She only said it is sad for her children to receive death threats.

CosmosDan said:
Mentioning it om national TV wasn’t enough?

No, if I were a politician and heard what Giffords said on MSNBC, it wouldn’t have been enough for me to remove it. That seems like normal political talk about someone being “targeted” politically.

I like Giffords. As I said, she used to be a Republican. That’s why there’s such an outpouring of love for her. It seems like she really wanted to work on illegal immigration and put forth a pay cut to members of the House. I think she did at least.

OxyCon said:
Jacky, what’s going on here is the American media is dead set upon destroying Sarah Palin. They want her to shut up and go away forever. This is why each week they find something ridiculous with which to impugn her character and to throw red meat to the far-left trolls so they can frenzy feed on hatred.

Welcome to the McCarthyism of the Democrat-media complex.

Yes and reading the comments here is amazing. It’s amazing at how much Plain gets under the liberals skin.

They just keep talking about her. It means that she is a threat to them…

ditchamerica said:
Fact: Pelosi’s hair hasn’t been washed in months

Oh, do you live with her? If not that’s a pretty ignorant thing to state as a fact. just4facts, why did you change your name?

the real john t said:
the real john t says:
January 18, 2011 at 2:05 am  (Quote)
0  1
Jackyboy said:
Have you been living under a rock for the past week?
Why don’t you tell me who has accused Plain of murder. And be specific with proof.

Here…right at the very beginning, while the bodies were still warm, DailKos’ founder:

Twitter / Markos Moulitsas: Mission accomplished, Sara …
Mission accomplished, Sarah Palin, http://is.gd/knNgl. … Mission …
twitter.com/markos/status/23821038362034176 – Cached

The New York Time’s Paul Krugman was next, followed by Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter, MessNBC’s Andrea Mitchell, then the entire MessNBC network. Use the “Google” man.

Pablo said:
And God willing, you’re on a mental health watch list that will preclude you from doing that.

Yes, unless you’re a sycophantic Palin jock strap rider, then you’re not entitled to your SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS. Nor your first Amendment right if you dare form an opinion of someone who can’t even take ownership of her own careless rhetoric but wants to take ownership of the White House for the purposes of having a reality TV show.

MiddleRoader said:
No that’s more than enough.

Maybe the gays you know, but not the ones I know.

Start treaty I don’t have a problem with.

Healthcare bill, I’m on the fence about.

I think we need to get away from our dependance on oil.

When you say tackle SS, how do you mean?

I don’t have a problem with the Bush tax cuts as long as the Republicans create more jobs, a lot more jobs. I have my doubts that will happen. But I never thought that taxing the rich, so to speak would ever fly even when Obama campaiged on that.

I’m pro choice.

With your stances, why is your name middleroader? There’s nothing middle road about that.

Palin is a strong proponent of gay rights. As I said, tons of conservative gays like her.
The START Treaty will turn out to be a sham….and probably not ratified.
So then if you’d like to get off of our dependence on oil, you would be pro-drilling. This will free up monies used in foreign gas sales.
What’s there to be on the fence about with health care? Either you like your rates going up or you don’t.

And as far as SS, I’m sure she’d take a reasoned approach with it. There’s different routes to examine. I think the smartest is the one that grandfathers the system.

WCinWI said:
With your stances, why is your name middleroader? There’s nothing middle road about that.

Palin is a strong proponent of gay rights. As I said, tons of conservative gays like her.
The START Treaty will turn out to be a sham….and probably not ratified.
So then if you’d like to get off of our dependence on oil, you would be pro-drilling. This will free up monies used in foreign gas sales.
What’s there to be on the fence about with health care? Either you like your rates going up or you don’t.

And as far as SS, I’m sure she’d take a reasoned approach with it. There’s different routes to examine. I think the smartest is the one that grandfathers the system.

By grandfathering, I really should’ve said like phasing out pensions. A similar system with SS – phasing it out over time.

OxyCon said:
And, Obama wouldn’t have survived 5 minutes under the same negative media barrage Palin has endured for 2 plus years.

OH yes! Obama for 4yrs has been called a marxist, socialist communist. A Kenyan that wasn’t born in the US. An undercover Islamic terrorist that wants to take down America.

I think he has survived more that 5mins without calling himself a victim constantly.

Looks like mediaite thinks there is something special about Sarah Palin.

http://www.mediaite.com/power-grid/person/?q=Sarah+Palin

Pablo said:
Enough to do what? Stop Jared Loughner?

Enough to take responsible for her careless rhetoric instead of shifting the blame to her paid lackeys. You know, the one responsible for inserting “blood libel” in a speech without knowing what it meant and where it’s been used throughout history. Again, only a REAL CONSERVATIVE would take personal accountability for their own words and rhetoric (whether or not they authored it or not). And yet again SARAH proves why she will never be considered a REAL CONSERVATIVE.

WCinWI said:
So then if you’d like to get off of our dependence on oil, you would be pro-drilling. This will free up monies used in foreign gas sales.

Do you have any idea where the oil we produce goes to? It goes on the world market. Do you think BP, Exxon or any of the other big oil companies are going to give it to us? Most of the oil comming out of Alaska is sold to Japan.

the real john t said:
OH yes! Obama for 4yrs has been called a marxist, socialist communist. A Kenyan that wasn’t born in the US. An undercover Islamic terrorist that wants to take down America.

I think he has survived more that 5mins without calling himself a victim constantly.

Is being called a Marxist a bad thing? Why would a capitalist president hire a communist to a czar position to create “jobs”? Does it bother you that Obama is a Christian? Do you think he is continuing the “Bush policy of Christian fascism”? Obama does seem to like Bush policies after all. In fact, Dick Cheney is going to talk about that very fact tomorrow on the today show.

Was it wrong to state: “Obama is a Keynsian”? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBrHkxqNT7s

ditchamerica said:
Each of you claiming Sara is angry and upset in this interview. You are dumber than dirt.
There is no inkling of anger. All of her comments were calm and thoughtful and in her usual tone. She only said it is sad for her children to receive death threats.

Why are you making it sound like being mad and upset is a vice? Was she yelling at the camera? No, but she was clearly pissed off, and rightfully so.

Mr B said:
Is being called a Marxist a bad thing? Why would a capitalist president hire a communist to a czar position to create “jobs”?…

Thank you, you just proved my point.

WCinWI said:
With your stances, why is your name middleroader? There’s nothing middle road about that. Palin is a strong proponent of gay rights. As I said, tons of conservative gays like her.The START Treaty will turn out to be a sham….and probably not ratified.So then if you’d like to get off of our dependence on oil, you would be pro-drilling. This will free up monies used in foreign gas sales.What’s there to be on the fence about with health care? Either you like your rates going up or you don’t. And as far as SS, I’m sure she’d take a reasoned approach with it. There’s different routes to examine. I think the smartest is the one that grandfathers the system.

I have stated before on here I do lean more to the left, just not over the cliff. I get tired of all the PC bs that the left tends to push more. While I do think we should have safety nets I think they need to be overhauled.

As far as oil, I would like to see us move more towards other energy means. I know it will be an expensive endeavor, but i think it would be better for the enviornment in the long run as well as economically. Course I’ll be dead before any of that.

Actually my healthcare rates went down this year.

MiddleRoader said:
I have stated before on here I do lean more to the left, just not over the cliff. I get tired of all the PC bs that the left tends to push more. While I do think we should have safety nets I think they need to be overhauled. As far as oil, I would like to see us move more towards other energy means. I know it will be an expensive endeavor, but i think it would be better for the enviornment in the long run as well as economically. Course I’ll be dead before any of that. Actually my healthcare rates went down this year.

I’d like to discuss more but honestly I’m tired and I’m gonna go now.

WCinWI said:
With your stances, why is your name middleroader? There’s nothing middle road about that. Palin is a strong proponent of gay rights. As I said, tons of conservative gays like her.The START Treaty will turn out to be a sham….and probably not ratified.So then if you’d like to get off of our dependence on oil, you would be pro-drilling. This will free up monies used in foreign gas sales.What’s there to be on the fence about with health care? Either you like your rates going up or you don’t. And as far as SS, I’m sure she’d take a reasoned approach with it. There’s different routes to examine. I think the smartest is the one that grandfathers the system.

See up there. I’m talking to myself. Have a good nite all.

I believe Sean did a proper thing to invite and give a political figure an opportunity to speak on something they were DRUG INTO BY VICIOUS IGNORANT PEOPLE making stupid accusations. This thread has a lot of disgusting male hormone reaction to what was simply an interview of a political figure who is female. A very effective, sincere, presentable, and articulate political figure. She represents many of our beliefs and political ideology yet stayed very focused on Sean’s questions. There was NO self pity and she repeatedly said this is not about me to make it clear she understands that political motives from the left want to destroy the messages of her and other conservatives. I am incredibly proud that a decent woman rooted in family, conservative values,and the Constitution is out there speaking relentlessly and FEARLESSLY to those values and exposing the flimsy and evil agendas bent on destroying those..

ditchamerica said:
This thread has a lot of disgusting male hormone reaction to what was simply an interview of a political figure who is female.

First of all she is no “political figure” her political days are over. And further more ” This thread has a lot of disgusting male hormone reaction…” Yes it does, by RWers such as yourself. Now why don’t you go to bed and look up at your poster of Palin on your ceiling and fantasize about her.

Frances probably wouldn’t have a job or a life if she couldn’t try to verbally beat Sarah Palin about the head and shoulders at least once a day. Sarah spent the first five minutes in memory of the victims, yet the nasty half-wits and slanderers on the left ignore reality—always a strange concept for these unhinged demented ideologues—and say that Sarah is making it all about herself.

So many homely, untalented, second-rate failed feminists on the left who are barren and botoxed to the hilt—they all HATE Sarah because she’s good-looking, young, and has a wonderful future ahead of her.

NPR started saying that the murders were Palin’s fault within two hours of the breaking news—no Juan Williams there as a firebreak to stop the flames of this raging firestorm of ignorance and hatred on the left. The new Congress will defund these agitpreppies ASAP and Soros and other treasonous Bolshies will pick up the slack in no time flat. Hyenas like Brokaw and Maher and the thankfully dead Peter Jennings, who gets an honorary grave-pissing for just being such a sodhole on these issues, are all guilty of zero journalism and 100% stupidity. As is Frances Martel, a truly third-rate excuse of a journalist.

Whenever Sarah reloads and lets these hyenas have it, I cheer her on. Even though I’d never vote for her for POTUS [Chris Christie has my nod so far], I love her for the enemies she’s made.

David Mangan said:
Sarah spent the first five minutes in memory of the victims,

WOW! Out of 45mins. That was awful kind of her By Golly Gee, before talking about herself being a victim.

David Mangan said:
Whenever Sarah reloads and lets these hyenas have it

You shouldn’t talk about Sarah’s fans like that.

Still, if she had handled the issue responsibly and like an adult the FIRST TIME, she wouldn’t have to continue to say “what I should have said” and “people have misunderstood me” BS. Maybe if she can complete an answer to a question about what “blood libel” meant completely and not sound like a high school student writing a half-assed answer to a essay question on a test, then she won’t need to reload. Barring that, she should stick to blaming aides for her failure to control her message.

I’m not a fan of Palin.

But I’d be as mad as she is. She was BLAMED for the shooting and she had nothing to do with it. The shooter was either a leftist or far right libertarian.

I’m libertarian, blame me. lol. Losers.

the real john t said:
WOW! Out of 45mins. That was awful kind of her By Golly Gee, before talking about herself being a victim.

She just continues to rewrite the speech she never wrote in the first place (because, as with the timing of the “target graphic take down, it’s clear her lackeys are responsible for it). A true leader would have gotten it right the first time and moved on to the real issues. But, of course, the real issue is that it’s a travesty of justice that Sarah Palin’s feelings have been hurt. Why in the world should we hold her responsible for her careless rhetoric when she didn’t actually come up with it?

WCinWI said:
Frances – The guy is left-leaning. The NY Times just had an article about him where it was mentioned that when Jarod saw Bush, he would foam at the mouth. “His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government.” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/16loughner.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1 This line is on Page 3

Gosh, because he was anti-authority…

Jackyboy said:
Why are you making it sound like being mad and upset is a vice? Was she yelling at the camera? No, but she was clearly pissed off, and rightfully so.

BS We watched it and didn’t get that impression at all. She was focused and didn’t get all bubbly and smiley because as she said we should be thinking of those suffering victims in Tucson. She was firm on the topic of where the concern and focus SHOULD BE. She is honest and would have simply stated it makes her angry to have threats on her family. She did not and instead refered to Timothy scripture that is the OPPOSITE of anger.
Her firmness in stating that she will not be shut up with threats or lies could be assumed to be anger, but it came across as firm resolve. She was in perfect control. Bill Mahyer’s recent comments are an example of TV anger against conservatives and TeaParty representatives. You are another example of assumptions about her and ascribing ficticious characteristics that are a product of your mind, not what was demonstrated by voice or words in the interview.

A Kim Bo said:
She just continues to rewrite the speech she never wrote in the first place (because, as with the timing of the “target graphic take down, it’s clear her lackeys are responsible for it). A true leader would have gotten it right the first time and moved on to the real issues. But, of course, the real issue is that it’s a travesty of justice that Sarah Palin’s feelings have been hurt. Why in the world should we hold her responsible for her careless rhetoric when she didn’t actually come up with it?

you betcha!

she’s had 2 chances now and F-d them both up. Wonder if she’ll go for 3

BFD said:
New Poll:

“Palin’s handling of Tucson tragedy…

Disapprove 46%
Approve 30%

WAPO/ABC News Poll – Jan 16″ sarah palin – like Mother, like daughter:untalented dancers&cheap whores! -Sarah, wipe that blood of the 9 yr old off your hands!

And you Righty’s thought all week that Sarah was winning her little campaign. lolol

David Mangan said:
So many homely, untalented, second-rate failed feminists on the left who are barren and botoxed to the hilt—they all HATE Sarah because she’s good-looking, young, and has a wonderful future ahead of her.

you forgot intelligent….oh wait!

Mr B said:
Was it wrong to state: “Obama is a Keynsian”?

And since Sarah Palin ran a state that received more in federal dollars per capita than any other state in the union while having the second lowest actual tax burden, it turns out that she’s a KEYNSIAN, too. So since she learned to be a KEYNSIAN from the President, maybe she could learn to be truly compassionate and civil from him, too. Turns out that she can learn a lot from a “terrorist” (her words, not mine).

ditchamerica said:
She was firm on the topic of where the concern and focus SHOULD BE

yes on herself.

ditchamerica said:
You are another example of assumptions

jackyboy is on your side….lol

It’s really a shame to see a brave public servant like Gabrielle Giffords get ‘targeted’ and shot and a spineless Sarah Palin goes on with hate speech and bragging about how she influenced this massacre in arizona without any consequences by the media

w_t_f said:
she’s had 2 chances now and F-d them both up. Wonder if she’ll go for 3

Only if it allows her to get her name in the papers again. Being that she’s unemployed, she’s got nothing really better to do. Plus it will give her another chance to show off her spiffy fireplace to the world.

the real john t said:
First of all she is no “political figure” her political days are over. And further more ” This thread has a lot of disgusting male hormone reaction…” Yes it does, by RWers such as yourself. Now why don’t you go to bed and look up at your poster of Palin on your ceiling and fantasize about her.

Her politcal days are here and now. A run for the President isn’t the most important role in politics for her. You are afraid of her you dumb little weeny

w_t_f said:
ditchamerica said:
She was firm on the topic of where the concern and focus SHOULD BE

yes on herself.

I think dirchamerica is FIRM on something to do with Palin, but certainly not the topic on hand.

ditchamerica said:
A run for the President isn’t the most important role in politics for her.

That’s right, she be far more useful on Bravo’s new Housewives of Wasilla.

A Kim Bo said:
I think dirchamerica is FIRM on something to do with Palin, but certainly not the topic on hand.

seems thinking with the wrong head is prevelant around here.

A Kim Bo said:
That’s right, she be far more useful on Bravo’s new Housewives of Wasilla.

lolol

the real john t said:
WOW! Out of 45mins. That was awful kind of her By Golly Gee, before talking about herself being a victim.

Don’t Lie Mr.Puke. The first five minutes was exclusively on victims and she referred back to them many times during the interview. She did not talk about herself. She answered the questions she was asked and made a point to say her responses were on behalf of ALL who had been blood libeled. She knows the meaning and she used it precisely and exactly the way the term is routinely used. You are a tool here and a pretty lousy one at that. You write like Martel. hmmmm what a coincidence.

Maliheh said:

You dumb turd what kind of a poll result do you expect from ABC other than one that dumps on Palin. No credibility whatsoever from you or ABC

ditchamerica said:
made a point to say her responses were on behalf of ALL who had been blood libeled

Whether she knows what that means or not.

ditchamerica said:
he knows the meaning and she used it precisely and exactly the way the term is routinely used

Actually she doesn’t KNOW the meaning because she admitted that she (or more likely her AIDES, ie her scapegoats for all that goes wrong with her poor rhetorical choices) borrowed it from a newspaper article. Even when she was answering the question about it’s meaning, she stumbled around like an unprepared high school student BSing their way through an answer on an essay exam. Which is perfect for her, that’s pretty much her approach to policy.

ditchamerica said:
You dumb turd what kind of a poll result do you expect from ABC other than one that dumps on Palin.

That’s right, REALITY has a well-known liberal bias. That’s why ditchy tries to avoid reality every chance he gets.

A Kim Bo said:
Even when she was answering the question about it’s meaning, she stumbled around like an unprepared high school student BSing their way through an answer

i noticed that too. that’s when she acted disgusted. good cover for not being able to complete the sentence.

Why do liberals assume that there aren’t other women out here,… besides Palin willing to call them out on their sleaziness and abject depravity ?
Clue, a woman can tell when another woman hasn’t washed her hair simply by LOOKING at it.
Kim Bo is conflicted and cannot even tell who is a female on this thread. No wonder he is such a loser on here. A fool tool with no intellectual grounding. Words devoid of substance.

ditchamerica said:
besides Palin willing to call them out on their sleaziness and abject depravity ?

yeah, she’d recognize sleaze. since she whores her kids out for a buck.

w_t_f said:
i noticed that too. that’s when she acted disgusted. good cover for not being able to complete the sentence.

She answered it and made it clear that it was an analogy. Also, that she isn’t the first to use the analogy:

“Jim Geraghty has pointed out, American commentators on both the left and the right have long used the term “blood libel” as an analogy–often with far less justification. In addition, Jews and Israelis commonly use the term in discussing unfair accusations in the context of debates about the Middle East and other issues”.

But then, you all are too ignorant to know an analogy when it hits you.

w_t_f said:
yeah, she’d recognize sleaze. since she whores her kids out for a buck.

You are stupid. Her daughter is an adult who has a right to make a decision to go on a program without her mother’s permission or involvement. The only whore here is your sick mind.

Did Patsy Ramsey whore her child out? (Jean Bennett for the clueless)

ditchamerica said:
Did Patsy Ramsey whore her child out? (Jean Bennett for the clueless)

yeah she did.

ditchamerica said:
You are stupid. Her daughter is an adult who has a right to make a decision to go on a program

did you even watch it. she couldn’t dance, didn’t want to dance and wasn’t all that interested in learning, got exasperated and wanted to quit at one point. quit, ha, runs in the family.

w_t_f said:
did you even watch it. she couldn’t dance, didn’t want to dance and wasn’t all that interested in learning, got exasperated and wanted to quit at one point. quit, ha, runs in the family.

It is irrelevant what the daughter did or didn’t do….and irrelevant as to who did or didn’t watch it. You write like a little teeny bopper gossip. Very unmanly of you. ….smirk*
If this all is so vile to you (mother and daughter) one must wonder why you hover here and take a pounding, or why you would hover over the acitivities of the daughter. A conflicted voyeur?

To be accurate when Sean asked Palin if she ever wanted to quit…..she made it clear she did not and would not quit vocally promoting conservative values and candidates. You have a distinct hearing and reading comprehension problem.

ditchamerica said:
It is irrelevant what the daughter did or didn’t do….and irrelevant

it is if the daughter is forced to do something she doesn’t want to. we, i, will never know for sure. unless she one day speaks out like ron reagan.

ditchamerica said:
To be accurate when Sean asked Palin if she ever wanted to quit…..she made it clear she did not and would not quit vocally promoting conservative values and candidates. You have a distinct hearing and reading comprehension problem.

oh hell no…she won’t quit. to lucrative. unlike finishing her term as gov. im sure alaska is pleased. but not such a good thing for her resume.

ditchamerica said:
why you hover here

scratching my head at this right now myself. sleep well you angry teablogger!

The funniest part is that big banner that says “Hannity Exclusive”.

That’s like Morning Joe getting an exclusive with Willie Geist. lolol

ditchamerica said:
besides Palin willing to call them out on their sleaziness and abject depravity ?

Says the women supporting the woman who whores out her children for press coverage. Sorry but even Palin herself aligned her ambitions with Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, ie people who couldn’t get elected Dog Catcher in their towns. If she wants to be taken seriously as a politician, she should start to act like one instead of the unemployed would-be hack she’s pawning herself off as.

ditchamerica said:
(Jean Bennett for the clueless)

JONBENET for those who don’t know how to Google their facts. And, no Patsy Ramsey only whored out one child. Sarah, with DWTS and her own TLC show are whoring out her family, sort of like Kate Gosselin (a more apt comparison). And all the children on the TLC are NOT adults–so much for your meandering attempts at logic.

ditchamerica said:
To be accurate when Sean asked Palin if she ever wanted to quit

You have to actually HAVE a job to QUIT it. Quitters can’t quit when there’s nothing to QUIT doing. What’s she going to quit doing, sitting in front of her fireplace making up increasingly desperate attempts to defend her honor. She doesn’t need a film crew to do that, that’s what Todd’s there for.

A Kim Bo said:
You have to actually HAVE a job to QUIT it. Quitters can’t quit when there’s nothing to QUIT doing. What’s she going to quit doing, sitting in front of her fireplace making up increasingly desperate attempts to defend her honor. She doesn’t need a film crew to do that, that’s what Todd’s there for.

I like Palin. She’s a breath of fresh air from all of the left wing hate – like yours.

A Kim Bo said:
You have to actually HAVE a job to QUIT it

For someone who YOU say doesn’t have a job, you sure do spend a good percentage of your limited brainpower on her.

Why are you so threatened by her?

She was excellent, as usual. I am going to guess this story is over for now. Sarah will get back on message and the media will be quiet for a few days, until they get some new guidance from Team Obama on how tocontinue their attacks on Sarah.

The media suck-ups to team Obama are pathetic, and the public will never again fall for their BS like they did during the last election.

TfT said:
She was excellent, as usual. I am going to guess this story is over for now. Sarah will get back on message and the media will be quiet for a few days, until they get some new guidance from Team Obama on how tocontinue their attacks on Sarah.

The media suck-ups to team Obama are pathetic, and the public will never again fall for their BS like they did during the last election.

Yes. The Left always thinks they can pull out the ole Statue of Liberty play and fool everyone every time they try it. It doesn’t work any more.

A Kim Bo said:
And since Sarah Palin ran a state that received more in federal dollars per capita than any other state in the union while having the second lowest actual tax burden, it turns out that she’s a KEYNSIAN, too.

Oh, so the governor controls federal spending in their state? Interesting. I did not know that. I’ll bet you did either until you heard that moronic, reality defying talking point from someone just as stupid as you are.

Those of us with people sense instinctively understand that Sarah Palin is honest and Barack Obama is not. If you want lies, you’ll get ‘em from leftist leaders. They look you in the eye, say one thing, and simultaneously do the opposite. If that’s alright with you, Obama is your guy.

A Kim Bo said:
Actually she doesn’t KNOW the meaning because she admitted that she (or more likely her AIDES, ie her scapegoats for all that goes wrong with her poor rhetorical choices) borrowed it from a newspaper article.

Quote? And when are you going to tell us what that word means and how you know it but Alan Dershowitz and Abe Foxman don’t? Pony up, Kimmie.

A Kim Bo said:
Sarah, with DWTS and her own TLC show are whoring out her family, sort of like Kate Gosselin (a more apt comparison). And all the children on the TLC are NOT adults–so much for your meandering attempts at logic.

Bristol on DWTS IS an adult and yet you say her mother is whoring her out when she has no control over the appearances. Your attempts at logic don’t even meander, they just go flying right off the cliff.

I was able to skim maybe the first 50 or so comments before nausea!
There are many lefty nut sacks commenting here that are as apt to go off
at any time as Jared Loughner. You make him look sane!
I would just pray you get some help before you also hurt a lot of innocent
people.
I think the hardest thing for me to understand is your obvious glee when your insults
are delivered in the nastiest tone possible.
OK have at me.
Fortunately I am in a position over the next two days that
makes it impossible for me to access a computer.
But I will catch up I am sure when I return. Nothing ever changes!

Probably NOT wrong said:
There are many lefty nut sacks commenting here that are as apt to go off
at any time as Jared Loughner. You make him look sane!

My exact sentiments!

Probably NOT wrong said:
I think the hardest thing for me to understand is your obvious glee when your insults
are delivered in the nastiest tone possible.

They aren’t very good at following the words of our leader … are they?

Jo Gregg said:
Those of us with people sense instinctively understand that Sarah Palin is honest and Barack Obama is not. If you want lies, you’ll get ‘em from leftist leaders. They look you in the eye, say one thing, and simultaneously do the opposite. If that’s alright with you, Obama is your guy.

Blind faith isn’t necessarily a virtue, and neither is partisan blinders. Unfortunately the business of politics means lying is often rationalized as part of the job. I don’t think either is completely honest.

The Left’s hatred of Sarah Palin is sickening. And revealing that all you can offer is your bile-soaked vitriol. Never a logical reason, never a rational argument. Just spittle, foaming at the mouth anger; inchoate, nihilistic rage.
Palin/Jindal 2012
John Bolton at State
Oliver North at Defense
Ted Nugent at Interior.

BFD said:
The funniest part is that big banner that says “Hannity Exclusive”.

That’s like Morning Joe getting an exclusive with Willie Geist. lolol

But don’t you think the real exclusiveness is what O’Hannity does with the interview? Probing.

Jon Fraud Carry said:
The Left’s hatred of Sarah Palin is sickening. And revealing that all you can offer is your bile-soaked vitriol. Never a logical reason, never a rational argument. Just spittle, foaming at the mouth anger; inchoate, nihilistic rage.
Palin/Jindal 2012
John Bolton at State
Oliver North at Defense
Ted Nugent at Interior.

Poor, poor Sarah. The Victim. Then. Now. Forever.

Ouch.

‘I am not going to shut up’: Sarah Palin defends herself as poll shows Americans disapprove of ‘blood libel’ rhetoric

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348163/Sarah-Palin-defends-poll-shows-Americans-disapprove-blood-libel-rhetoric.html#ixzz1BOYNJ0DT

Only 30 % approval, I think they all post on Mediaite. Haha.

It is OK when the lefties banter about the usage of Blood Libel against those they disagree with, but it is hellfire and brimstone for Sarah Palin to do so.

Here are many instances of such:

From NRO: http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/256955/term-blood-libel-more-common-you-might-think …January 12, 2011 9:51 A.M. By Jim Geraghty

And here:
From Blackwater at MediaCurves: http://mediacurves.com/Politics/SarahPalinonTucson/Index.cfm

“Ye hypocrites!” declared our Lord. “You heap on other people pains which you yourselves could not endure!”

To paraphrase Mark Twain: “The rumors of Sarah Palin’s political demise have been greatly exaggerated.”

Sarah Palin is a vicious little animal, when attacked, she has the audacity to defend herself.

Jon Fraud Carry said:
The Left’s hatred of Sarah Palin is sickening. And revealing that all you can offer is your bile-soaked vitriol. Never a logical reason, never a rational argument. Just spittle, foaming at the mouth anger; inchoate, nihilistic rage.
Palin/Jindal 2012
John Bolton at State
Oliver North at Defense
Ted Nugent at Interior.

Tee Hee.

This woman makes water on a windshield look deep.

TfT said:
She was excellent, as usual. I am going to guess this story is over for now. Sarah will get back on message and the media will be quiet for a few days, until they get some new guidance from Team Obama on how tocontinue their attacks on Sarah.

The media suck-ups to team Obama are pathetic, and the public will never again fall for their BS like they did during the last election.

Sarah is finished, I am happy teabags fail to realize that their support for Sarah means Obama gets reelected. It is really that simple. So please keep defending her. I will help you.

LEAVE SARAH ALONE!!!!

Old Duffer said:
It is OK when the lefties banter about the usage of Blood Libel against those they disagree with, but it is hellfire and brimstone for Sarah Palin to do so.

Here are many instances of such:

From NRO: http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/256955/term-blood-libel-more-common-you-might-think …January 12, 2011 9:51 A.M. By Jim Geraghty

And here:
From Blackwater at MediaCurves: http://mediacurves.com/Politics/SarahPalinonTucson/Index.cfm

“Ye hypocrites!” declared our Lord. “You heap on other people pains which you yourselves could not endure!”

To paraphrase Mark Twain: “The rumors of Sarah Palin’s political demise have been greatly exaggerated.”

Sarah Palin is a vicious little animal, when attacked, she has the audacity to defend herself.

SO, you’re saying Sarah Palin has been victimized yet again? That’s dreadful. I say: Dreadful!

So a 911 Truther Bush hater is not a liberal even though his friends decribed him as liberal? Curious why did Obama wait for over five days to mildly speak against falsehoods and the blood libel of the left. It seem they are the stupid ones.

It’s the beginning of the inevitable self-immolation of Sarah Palin. It’s a beautiful thing.

Boomer said:
It’s the beginning of the inevitable self-immolation of Sarah Palin. It’s a beautiful thing.

Knew this would happen back when she got picked by John McCain, it was really only a matter of time. It is truly a beautiful thing.

Never enjoyed the self destruction of a human being so completely in my life.

Boomer said:
It’s the beginning of the inevitable self-immolation of Sarah Palin. It’s a beautiful thing.

It will be interesting how well this Post-Crucifixion Palin sells. I’m not seeing any Emmaus moment.

Color Me Badd said:
Never enjoyed the self destruction of a human being so completely in my life.

see it every day in the downtown area

Jon Fraud Carry said:
The Left’s hatred of Sarah Palin is sickening. And revealing that all you can offer is your bile-soaked vitriol. Never a logical reason, never a rational argument. Just spittle, foaming at the mouth anger; inchoate, nihilistic rage.
Palin/Jindal 2012
John Bolton at State
Oliver North at Defense
Ted Nugent at Interior.

This is a parody in itself.
Palin/Jindal = Not a match made in heaven.
John Bolton: A loud mouth war monger and a daft dodger.
Oliver North: A drug trafficker and a convicted felon, who dealt with the contras.
Ted Nugent: A self confessed draft dodger.

What a team to lead America into it’s final destruction.

Pablo said:
Oh, so the governor controls federal spending in their state? Interesting. I did not know that. I’ll bet you did either until you heard that moronic, reality defying talking point from someone just as stupid as you are.

But they can ask/beg for it.

WCinWI said:
No, if I were a politician and heard what Giffords said on MSNBC, it wouldn’t have been enough for me to remove it. That seems like normal political talk about someone being “targeted” politically.

She talked about her office being vandalized and how much worse the political rhetoric was than it had been for years. , specifically mentioning Palin’s map. If that wasn’t a plea to tone it down I doubt a phone call would have done it, but it’s all pointless speculation anyway.

WCinWI said:
I like Giffords. As I said, she used to be a Republican. That’s why there’s such an outpouring of love for her. It seems like she really wanted to work on illegal immigration and put forth a pay cut to members of the House. I think she did at least.

There was an outpouring of love because she used to be a republican? I’m going to assume you don’t mean that the way it sounds.
Maybe there’s an outpouring of love because she’s a genuine great person, rather than her political views.
We need to not lose sight of the fact that people can have very different political views on how to solve this countries problems and still be very genuine patriots with a deep love of country. Neither side is bad or evil, although there are dishonest assholes on both sides. People aren’t bad or evil or stupid, simply because they disagree with us about politics.
I have conservative and liberal friends and relatives who are great people who make a real contribution to society and the lives of people around them. I wish we could keep that in mind more when it’s time to talk policy and problem solving. Politicians and media like to divide us and sensationalize things. It’s time to stop buying into that.

the real john t said:
WOW! Out of 45mins. That was awful kind of her By Golly Gee, before talking about herself being a victim.

It sounded very sincere when she quoted scripture and said we need to remember it’s not about me, but I think the failing was saying, “remember it’s not about me, but now let’s talk about me”

I don’t blame her for being upset. She was treated unfairly. I think she’d have done herself more good to offer condolences ,and prayers , to assure people she does not condone violence, and then give it some time before she addressed the rest.

CosmosDan said:
I think she’d have done herself more good to offer condolences ,and prayers

That’s the first thing she did, 3 times now. That was the entirety of her first post on the shootings, the opening of the video statement and the first thing said on Hannity. So, she’d have done herself more good if she’d done exactly what she did?

CosmosDan said:
to assure people she does not condone violence, and then give it some time before she addressed the rest.

Have you assured us that you don’t condone violence? Did you take some time afterward before you said anything else?

The Real Rabid Kook said:
SO, you’re saying Sarah Palin has been victimized yet again? That’s dreadful. I say: Dreadful!

You seem significantly more butthurt than Ms. Palin, Kook. In fact, there’s an awful lot of hate floating around here. You folks should listen to President Obama and get a hold of yourselves.

the real john t said:
WHarropson said:
The Blood Libel comparison she used was accurate,
Yeah right, since Giffords is Jewish. You idiot.

She (Palin) has a Jewish Lawyer and a Rabbi agreeing with her use of Blood Libel. They know more than I do about it. Giffords is Jewish? Then maybe she’d (Giffords) agree with reasonable people. She doesen’t appear to be the victim type.

CosmosDan said:
She talked about her office being vandalized and how much worse the political rhetoric was than it had been for years. , specifically mentioning Palin’s map. If that wasn’t a plea to tone it down I doubt a phone call would have done it, but it’s all pointless speculation anyway.

There was an outpouring of love because she used to be a republican? I’m going to assume you don’t mean that the way it sounds.
Maybe there’s an outpouring of love because she’s a genuine great person, rather than her political views.
We need to not lose sight of the fact that people can have very different political views on how to solve this countries problems and still be very genuine patriots with a deep love of country. Neither side is bad or evil, although there are dishonest assholes on both sides. People aren’t bad or evil or stupid, simply because they disagree with us about politics.
I have conservative and liberal friends and relatives who are great people who make a real contribution to society and the lives of people around them. I wish we could keep that in mind more when it’s time to talk policy and problem solving. Politicians and media like to divide us and sensationalize things. It’s time to stop buying into that.

She went on a liberal network to discuss political dissent. I am sorry that her office was vandalized but since she’s a moderate, she probably was in one of the more “passionate” districts politically.

I think the rhetoric is going to get worse. You can’t have a President and an entire media institution claim millions of people as accessories to murder and expect them all to react nicely.

Obama gave a decent speech. However, he didn’t give any one-liners that you’re going to be talking about years from now. Obama had the ability to lead with his own rhetoric by calling out his base, but he failed. It’s really as simple as that. I’d expect the same on the Republican side if the President was a Republican.

A crazed canary – in search of a cage.

I read Frances Martel’s column. I copied this line. I wonder, was Frances the first or the next to last of Sarah Palin’s ‘enemies’ to take this tack?

“and her “enemies” are not likely to resist the temptation of chewing on her political remains tomorrow morning.”

rusino said:
I read Frances Martel’s column. I copied this line. I wonder, was Frances the first or the next to last of Sarah Palin’s ‘enemies’ to take this tack?

“and her “enemies” are not likely to resist the temptation of chewing on her political remains tomorrow morning.”

Yeah – that’s a bit creepy and is over-the-top rhetoric that is not needed.

WCinWI said:
I think the rhetoric is going to get worse. You can’t have a President and an entire media institution claim millions of people as accessories to murder and expect them all to react nicely.

What a grotesque and inaccurate exaggeration.

This is exactly how it goes downhill and becomes so unproductive. Nothing like that happened.

Pablo said:
That’s the first thing she did, 3 times now. That was the entirety of her first post on the shootings, the opening of the video statement and the first thing said on Hannity. So, she’d have done herself more good if she’d done exactly what she did?

Try responding to whole sentences rather than changing my meaning by breaking them apart.

Pablo said:
Have you assured us that you don’t condone violence? Did you take some time afterward before you said anything else?

I am not a national media figure so this is irrelevant.

Frances writes:
“but at some point it was hard to remember whether it was Palin or Rep. Gabrielle Giffords who took bullets two weeks ago.”

Seriously. Giffords is breathing through a tube and eating via a feeding tube. Your sarcasm is quite revolting.

You need to all in the media get a SEROUS grip on reality. Palin doesn’t seem to have the same inability to understand humanity some of you lack. Honestly, where is the humanity when you write something so profoundly cruel.

Another hateful, untrue article about Sarah Palin.
I’ve come to realize how sexist left-wingers are, even female left wingers – women are supposed to shut up and stay in their place!

lane said:
Frances writes:

Seriously. Giffords is breathing through a tube and eating via a feeding tube. Your sarcasm is quite revolting.

Looks like Falin is on life support too. Fading fast. Damn shame, she would have made great cannon fodder for Obama in 2012. Now I wonder who wants to step in front of the Obama train and take one for the Gipper.
Any Republicans willing to “man up”?

When she runs she can preach to everyone else.
Don’t you wish you had a choir Frances Martel ?

CosmosDan said:
Try responding to whole sentences rather than changing my meaning by breaking them apart.

You’re still siggesting that she should have done EXACTLY WHAT SHE DID. Apparently, you’re not paying attention.

I am not a national media figure so this is irrelevant.

Why is that? Perhaps you can give us a list of the people who need to assure you that they don’t approve of violence before they’re cleared to address other issues. I’ve heard very, very few national media figures offer that disclaimer.

Pablo said:
You’re still siggesting that she should have done EXACTLY WHAT SHE DID. Apparently, you’re not paying attention.

Apparently the complete sentence thing went over your head.

PDS alert. Frances – seek help, you desperately need it.

MiddleRoader said:
So I didn’t hear him tell her he googled her and came up with 10,000 hits linking her with the shooting? I believe I did.

Here is part of the transcript of the interview with Hannity…You wanted to know where the video was posted. Not going to watch it again, maybe this will suffice.

HANNITY: Governor, I Googled your name and I put in the words, Sarah Palin Tucson shooting. And it came up nearly 10,000 times in 10,000 instances where you connected to this. When did you first realize you were being connected to this tragedy?

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/transcript/sarah-palin-defends-blood-libel-remark-first-interview-arizona-shooting

For Pablo

MiddleRoader said:
Here is part of the transcript of the interview with Hannity…You wanted to know where the video was posted. Not going to watch it again, maybe this will suffice. HANNITY: Governor, I Googled your name and I put in the words, Sarah Palin Tucson shooting. And it came up nearly 10,000 times in 10,000 instances where you connected to this. When did you first realize you were being connected to this tragedy? http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/transcript/sarah-palin-defends-blood-libel-remark-first-interview-arizona-shooting

And Pablo,

Facebook does not count. Not everyone has an account. I watched Sat-Tues CNN and Fox, mostly Fox because they had the better coverage. I never once heard them mention her Facebook posting to the AZ tragedy.

MiddleRoader said:
And Pablo,

Facebook does not count. Not everyone has an account. I watched Sat-Tues CNN and Fox, mostly Fox because they had the better coverage. I never once heard them mention her Facebook posting to the AZ tragedy.

That’s where she posted that graphic that was supposed to be responsible for this. And it’s also where she posted that video last Wednesday. So how can that not count? You didn’t hear about that video on the news?

Not everybody has a TV. Not everybody has cable. Not everybody has a computer. Do those not count?

MiddleRoader said:
And it came up nearly 10,000 times in 10,000 instances where you connected to this.

Yes, We agree on that. But it isn’t the question we were talking about. Let’s review:

CosmosDan said:
So, saying those hits are blaming her is pure bullshit.

See the part about whether they’re blaming her? That’s the question I was addressing. Hannity did not say they were. You can stop posting that he said he got 10,000 hits connecting her to the story. We know that. It is true. What Hannity did not say, and what I said he did not say was that all those hits are blaming her.

So, CosmosDan said what I quoted above. I asked him who did that. You replied that Hannity did and I’m telling you he didn’t. Now, either find Hannity saying that all of those links blamed her for the shooting or find something else to talk about. I’m all done with the tail chasing on the subject.

Kim Bo is a tool for Dem oralized rats
Takes about 10 minutes to dent his tin coated ganglia, after which it is exposed in a quivering mass of “Palin aphobic” incoherent dribble.

Actually it was Cecelia that said the 10,000 hits blamed her. Now technically you are correct..Hannity did not use the word blame. But all week long that is what the right has been claiming that the left was blaming. So ….hence that is how I put the connection together.

As far as facebook. Whatever. I don’t consider that a major source to get news information. I guess I should know better when it comes to Palin since she hides from all other sources except Fox, Facebook and Twitter. See, she just really isn’t that important to me. So…I don’t follow her every word to want to go to facebook or do the twitter thing with her (or anyone for that matter).

And again, I will repeat. I have never personally linked her with the shootings and don’t believe it was correct for anyone else to have done so.

I just think she showed little compassion and was more worried about her ass. I’m intitled to my opinion as you are of yours.

Pablo said:
I’m all done with the tail chasing on the subject.

That’s fine. I saw a post from you on another thread that said I hadn’t shown the video to you yet. So I thought I’d look for it.

GulfFrit said:
Another hateful, untrue article about Sarah Palin.I’ve come to realize how sexist left-wingers are, even female left wingers – women are supposed to shut up and stay in their place!

Excuse me. YOU stay in your place in the storm sewer to which you surely belong. You do not make sense defending Palin’s responses then tell OTHER women to stay in their place? WTF are you smoking?

I would absolutely love it if Sarah Palin becomes president, just to watch her fail.

MiddleRoader said:
I’m intitled to my opinion as you are of yours.

*entitled

MiddleRoader said:
Actually it was Cecelia that said the 10,000 hits blamed her. Now technically you are correct..Hannity did not use the word blame. But all week long that is what the right has been claiming that the left was blaming. So ….hence that is how I put the connection together. As far as facebook. Whatever. I don’t consider that a major source to get news information. I guess I should know better when it comes to Palin since she hides from all other sources except Fox, Facebook and Twitter. See, she just really isn’t that important to me. So…I don’t follow her every word to want to go to facebook or do the twitter thing with her (or anyone for that matter). And again, I will repeat. I have never personally linked her with the shootings and don’t believe it was correct for anyone else to have done so. I just think she showed little compassion and was more worried about her ass. I’m intitled to my opinion as you are of yours.

YOUR opinion is retarded when the fact is Hannity asked her the questions ABOUT HER and she answered them repeatedly stating in her response that it isn’t about HER it is about the victims and the right for all famous and infamous persons to speak out. What was she supposed to say….”I refuse to answer that question Sean because it is about me, not about the messiah obama speech”.. and I know Middle-of the road- killer will expect me to refuse to answer”.? Get a grip and a life….the fence you pretend to straddle is wearing through to your two tiny brain lobes…..Palin-aphobic

CosmosDan said:
Apparently the complete sentence thing went over your head.

Apparently you have no head.

ditchamerica said:
infamous persons

Sarah is this you?

MiddleRoader said:
But all week long that is what the right has been claiming that the left was blaming. So ….hence that is how I put the connection together.

The left has been blaming her. That’s how she suddenly became a central part of a story that she had no connection at all to.

As far as facebook. Whatever. I don’t consider that a major source to get news information. I guess I should know better when it comes to Palin since she hides from all other sources except Fox, Facebook and Twitter.

And Oprah, and the NYT and ABC News… But really, if you don’t know that Palin is creating national news from her Facebook page, you ought to catch up. I can hardly imagine how you can come anywhere near following the news on her and still be unaware of her Facebook posts.

329 comments for this nutty bitch. She can’t even have a news conference because she’s afraid someone might ask her to point out Alaska on the map. Sean Hannity – are you kidding me??

Frances Martel wrote:> …her enemies are not likely to resist the temptation of chewing on her political remains tomorrow morning.

I believe this falls under the catagory of NAMING YOUR OWN POISON.

Sleep well.

Eric said:
329 comments for this nutty bitch. She can’t even have a news conference because she’s afraid someone might ask her to point out Alaska on the map. Sean Hannity – are you kidding me??

She’s apparently a huge threat to the liberals and that’s why they keep her in the news.

ditchamerica said:
Apparently you have no head.

Wow…………..good one???

Hello friendz

West Virginia gun trader is a forum which is related to sell
or trade any gun according to west Verginia state laws. You are welcome to the
forum and share everything.

thanks