Yep, there’s CNN with their “balanced” opinion show. One commentator is a flaming liberal who pees standing up. And the other one is Elliot Spitzer.

Mr. Ziegler has grow himself a beard, but still say the same old stuff. Cry me a river, John, 08 is gone and 10 is almost over. Get a life!

Parker Spitzer is a JOKE. Parker could not carry Palin’s hockey stick. How soon will this show be gone. Soon I hope.

@gordonbloyershow
What would do about it if it’s still there?

I won’t know if it is still there since I have not watched it the first time yet.

This is yet another example of what makes CNN’s non biased campaign a joke. SHE is your resident conservative voice?!?! CNN and MSNBC are more than just kissing cousins. They’re incestuous siblings with a desire for producing a nation of mentally challenged offspring.

Well, if their show tanks, then I guess they can do an Internet show like Gordo does. You, know, bloviate in a forest where no one listens….

By the looks of those ratings it appears Kathleen Parker
is out of her league as a TV Co-host. Just asying!

New way to spell saying above.

Ziggy’s right about Tina Fey, but I doubt Kathleen Parker had any effect on Palin outside of “elite” society.

Ziegler is a BROADCASTING LEGEND whose obsession with Sarah and her family rivals only MY OWN!!!11 I was LUCKY enough to meet him at the AWESOME “fire letterman” rally this past summer!!!!!111 Whatta guy!!!!!!!111

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OfIgRtHpnU

And might I say, the GOATEE is a nice TOUCH!!!!!!!!1111 LOVE YA, Ziggy!!!!!!!1111

Now, remind me which of these two CNN hosts is the conservative. Is it the one who claims to have led the character assassination of Sarah Palin? Or is it the liberal one?

This is so typical of CNN’s approach to representing different views. They have a liberal on one hand, and a liberal masquerading as a conservative as the other. And then CNN wonders why this show — heck, ALL of their shows — get such miserable ratings. As if people are too dumb to figure out this nightly charade in which a a steady stream of progressive Democrats stick their faces into the camera and try to pretend as if they represent a broad cross-section of Americans.

CNN desperately needs to learn from their more successful competitor. They put on shows every night in every time slow where people don’t pretend and play-act, but actually engage in frank dialogue over the issues of he day. And they win the ratings war every night, ever time slot, every week, every month every year.

John Ziegler rules!!

Sarah Palin, who has received nothing but hysterical, foaming-at-the-mouth, vicious, mean-spirited, false, mis-leading and totally biased slime attacks from the lunatic-left and their “Corrupt B-tard” puppets in the lamestream media, is now indisputably the MOST POWERFUL, MOST INFLUENTIAL, MOST EFFECTIVE woman politician in America today (special thanks to the Trifecta of Scum, aka the official “You Lie!” hussein cheerleading squad, nbc, snl and tina fey. And ,of course, couric deserves a special place in hell for her unrestrained bias against Palin and all that is American.). So, to the lamestream lunatic-left, I say: keep it up until President Palin – and the overwhelming majority of the American people – have the last laugh at you.

Assassination? Palin committed suicide the moment she opened her mouth….

Hey Mediaite I wouldn’t brag on the fact that John Ziegler worked for you. That guy honestly has zero grasp of how the political media works. Spitzer brought up a great point the media has always fallen in love with candidates and pumped them up. Remember what the did with John McCain in 2000 and for years after that (until he self destructed in 2008), Ziegler is either a liar and knows how the system works and is manipulating it on Sarah’s behalf or he has no concept of poltics vs. media. It is really embarrassing that you guys actually hired this clown to write for you guys.

felixw said:
Now, remind me which of these two CNN hosts is the conservative. Is it the one who claims to have led the character assassination of Sarah Palin? Or is it the liberal one?

This is so typical of CNN’s approach to representing different views. They have a liberal on one hand, and a liberal masquerading as a conservative as the other. And then CNN wonders why this show — heck, ALL of their shows — get such miserable ratings. As if people are too dumb to figure out this nightly charade in which a a steady stream of progressive Democrats stick their faces into the camera and try to pretend as if they represent a broad cross-section of Americans.

CNN desperately needs to learn from their more successful competitor. They put on shows every night in every time slow where people don’t pretend and play-act, but actually engage in frank dialogue over the issues of he day. And they win the ratings war every night, ever time slot, every week, every month every year.

The reason Kathleen Parker led the charge against Sarah Palin in 08 is because she is a conservative and knew that Sarah Palin would lose the election for McCain (which she did). Many smart conservatives saw this early on and said so, people like Charles Krauthammer, David Brooks, even Christopher Hitchens all came out and said this woman was unqualified to be vice-president and this is going to lose the election for McCain.

Peggy Noonan and McCain’s former campaign manager Mike something were caught on an open mic in September saying “it’s over for McCain”. That is why these people were so vocal in trying to destroy Palin, they knew that McCain fucked up big time picking her and that she would lose him the election which is what happened, along with him not knowing dick about the economy and suspending his campaign like a pussy but you get the picture.

This is why the show has failed. It’s far from balanced. Nice try CNN.

I’m with Ziegler, Sarah would make an excellent presidential candidate. Only she has the draw to keep the tea party revolution going.

gordonbloyershow said:
Parker Spitzer is a JOKE. Parker could not carry Palin’s hockey stick. How soon will this show be gone. Soon I hope.

I see Blower came out from under his rock for another one-liner. Are you able to put more words together than one sentence. I think not. Just like the love of your life Ms. Sarah. Good for one line.

Jonathhan says:

The reason Kathleen Parker led the charge against Sarah Palin in 08 is because she is a conservative

Sorry, but conservatives do NOT consider her one of them.

Karl Spensen said:
Ziegler is a BROADCASTING LEGEND whose obsession with Sarah and her family rivals only MY OWN!!!11 I was LUCKY enough to meet him at the AWESOME “fire letterman” rally this past summer!!!!!111 Whatta guy!!!!!!!111 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OfIgRtHpnU

Karl you keep bragging about the Letterman protest. What was it about 16 of you that showed up. Pleaseeeeeee

valkyrie101 said:
I’m with Ziegler, Sarah would make an excellent presidential candidate. Only she has the draw to keep the tea party revolution going.

I agree. I can’t wait for the campaign to start.

Jonathan Scott said:
Remember what the did with John McCain in 2000 and for years after that (until he self destructed in 2008), Ziegler is either a liar and knows how the system works and is manipulating it on Sarah’s behalf or he has no concept of poltics vs. media. It is really embarrassing that you guys actually hired this clown to write for you guys.

That’s a retarded example and here is why:

1. The MSM liked McCain, because he was a “maverick”. To the media, a maverick is a Republican who goes against republicans. So, they liked McCain because they could use him against Republicans. They do the same thing with his daughter and Kathleen Parker. The second McCain started siding with “the right” again, they turned on him.

2. You have no other examples. The left wing MSM has been doing the same thing for decades. Republicans = dumb cowboys, Democrats = Brilliant masters of the universe

TeaPartyPatriot said:
Sarah Palin, who has received nothing but hysterical, foaming-at-the-mouth, vicious, mean-spirited, false, mis-leading and totally biased slime attacks from the lunatic-left and their “Corrupt B-tard” puppets in the lamestream media, is now indisputably the MOST POWERFUL, MOST INFLUENTIAL, MOST EFFECTIVE woman politician in America today (special thanks to the Trifecta of Scum, aka the official “You Lie!” hussein cheerleading squad, nbc, snl and tina fey. And ,of course, couric deserves a special place in hell for her unrestrained bias against Palin and all that is American.). So, to the lamestream lunatic-left, I say: keep it up until President Palin – and the overwhelming majority of the American people – have the last laugh at you.

You honestly believe that Palin and the Tea Party will win in 2012? Honey you must be smoking something.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Jonathhan says: The reason Kathleen Parker led the charge against Sarah Palin in 08 is because she is a conservative Sorry, but conservatives do NOT consider her one of them.

Hi Michele will you please define conserative for me. I am confused.

BlackWidow said:
I agree. I can’t wait for the campaign to start.

Sarah should commission a TV show, on FOX, a reality series playing every day, to cover it all. Because as it is now Sarah gets no cut of that revenue.

Spider lady says:
I am confused.

What else is new?

Dronetek said:
That’s a retarded example and here is why:

1. The MSM liked McCain, because he was a “maverick”. To the media, a maverick is a Republican who goes against republicans. So, they liked McCain because they could use him against Republicans. They do the same thing with his daughter and Kathleen Parker. The second McCain started siding with “the right” again, they turned on him.

2. You have no other examples. The left wing MSM has been doing the same thing for decades. Republicans = dumb cowboys, Democrats = Brilliant masters of the universe

I have tons of examples, Ronald Reagan??? You remember that guy, the media loved him. Even though he raised taxes in a recession, that shit didnt matter to the press, it’s Reagan! What about in 94 when Newt Gingrich could do no wrong, you remember the media falling all over him until he fucked it up for himself and shut down the government and even his own party deserted him. What about people like Tom Delay who practically lives on the Hardball set as much as he is on there, and Chris Matthews worships that guy. What about Giulani after 9/11 and up until his implosion during the Republican Primaries. There are countless examples. I could even mention Sarah Palin, sure there are plenty who dont like her in the media but there are plenty that do, and give her air time and ink like no one else. This woman is a quitter she isn’t in politics at all and the media falls all over themselves trying to get to her. It is pathetic there are far too many example of Republican candidates being the darlings of the press.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Spider lady says:I am confused. What else is new?

See you took that as snark when all I was asking for is your defination of conservative. To me Parker is a conservative and all of you on here rail against your OWN. Why? I try to give you the benefit of the doubt and you slam me. I don’t usually agree with King but on you maybe I should.

Dronetek said:
1. The MSM liked McCain, because he was a “maverick”. To the media, a maverick is a Republican who goes against republicans. So, they liked McCain because they could use him against Republicans. They do the same thing with his daughter and Kathleen Parker. The second McCain started siding with “the right” again, they turned on him.

It was entirely predictable. In the summer of 2007, John McCain was running 5th in a four-man race: Giuliani, Huckabee, Romney, and Fred Thompson. The MSM worked overtime to drive up the negatives of each, except for Huckabee because they never considered him worth the hassle of destroying. Even though McCain was only the first choice of a tiny fraction of Republicans, he won by default…. and immediately the MSM turned against HIM. He was no longer Maverick John McCain, he was Old John McCain. with every gaff highlighted as evidence of senility.

What a crock of crapola ! Any bad reflection on Sarah Palin was done by her own self. Nobody even knew who this bimbo was when we were told that day in Fall 2008 that McCain had just chosen her ! She was one of those arrogan, confident speakers that merely whetted up a crowd’s emotions. We had no feelings of her one way or the other until she started giving interviews and we saw just how inexperienced she was to run for VP of this country! How totally low information, uninformed, uneducated. Even McCain by the end of his campaign, could barely stand to look at her when together on a stage. Did you read Game Change, and listen to how this pretend Diva thought she should be treated? WHY did McCain’s campaign aides all blast her? Was THAT the media?

Come on, give it up ! Sarah Palin is nothing more than a loud, dumb broad who has the gift of gab! The media had nothing to do with making her look bad—-she was quite capable of that herself!!

Black Widow asks”

“Hi Michele will you please define conserative for me. I am confused”

there are few REAL conservatives left. You know, the ones who use to believe in small government and low taxes. Most of those I know, voted for Obama last election, because the alternative of fear that Sarah Palin might become President should old man McCain kick off, frightened them to death.
They are totally disgusted with the turn to the Extreme Right and the hate involved with it. .

Here is my media rant. Are there liberals in the media? Of course. But just like Hollywood (where there are also many liberals), the bottom line is money. Money is more important than anything else. It makes the world go round. Corporations want to make money. Movie studios want to make money. Media organizations want to make money. The modern media, especially with declining revenues and ad sales, will do whatever it takes to survive. They will cover Snooki, Obama, Palin, and alien invasions as long as it drives page views, viewer numbers, magazine/newspaper sales, and advertising revenues. Now that doesn’t mean all of the coverage will be fair. The media has a tendency to simplify and sensationalize. That is why people of all political persuasion, not just conservatives, she media bias. Like it or not, agree with them or not, groups like Media Matters exist because lefties also believe there is media bias. At the end of the day, with boards to answer to and shareholders to please and jobs to save, the media will do what they can to increase and retain viewers, subscribers, and readers. I would bet that you are far more likely to hear “what will generate more viewers/readers/subscribers?” than “how can we continue to further our liberal agenda?” from a media exec or in a newsroom. The bottom line is green, not red or blue.

It’s interesting to note that the far left commenters here are always the most vocal in defending the “impartiality” of CNN. And the farther LEFT they are, the more they insist that CNN is IMPARTIAL. That tells you everything you need to know about CNN.

TeaPartyPatriot said:
Sarah Palin, who has received nothing but hysterical, foaming-at-the-mouth, vicious, mean-spirited, false, mis-leading and totally biased slime attacks from the lunatic-left and their “Corrupt B-tard” puppets in the lamestream media, is now indisputably the MOST POWERFUL, MOST INFLUENTIAL, MOST EFFECTIVE woman politician in America today (special thanks to the Trifecta of Scum, aka the official “You Lie!” hussein cheerleading squad, nbc, snl and tina fey. And ,of course, couric deserves a special place in hell for her unrestrained bias against Palin and all that is American.). So, to the lamestream lunatic-left, I say: keep it up until President Palin – and the overwhelming majority of the American people – have the last laugh at you.

Your a nut job hahaha I hope your small world is a happier place because of Palin.

felixw said:
It’s interesting to note that the far left commenters here are always the most vocal in defending the “impartiality” of CNN. And the farther LEFT they are, the more they insist that CNN is IMPARTIAL. That tells you everything you need to know about CNN.

Yes because you are an impartial observer and voice of reason. Could one also say then that the further RIGHT someone is, the more vocal they will be about defending the “impartiality” of Fox News?

Spider lady says:

See you took that as snark when all I was asking for is your defination of conservative.

Bull

TeaPartyPatriot said:
overwhelming majority of the American people

Have you seen this idiots ratings with the American Public. She is having a good run with your money LEMMINGS.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Spider lady says:

See you took that as snark when all I was asking for is your defination of conservative.

Bull

Isn’t is hard to define though? I certainly don’t believe all conservatives are the same, just like all liberals are not the same.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Sorry, but conservatives do NOT consider her one of them

Most are saying this about Palin also.

My point is just that most poeple that I’ve come in contact with who consider themselves conservatives do NOT consider Parker one, except maybe David Brooks.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
My point is just that most poeple that I’ve come in contact with who consider themselves conservatives do NOT consider Parker one, except maybe David Brooks.

That’s not hard to believe.

yr so liberl chuck norris said:
I have tons of examples, Ronald Reagan??? You remember that guy, the media loved him.

I don’t know what alternate universe you come from, but in my mine Reagan was painted as a stupid, racist, slow, cowboy. Much like Bush and just about every prominent Republican is.

paulmdoro said:
Isn’t is hard to define though? I certainly don’t believe all conservatives are the same, just like all liberals are not the same.

Show me the prominent liberals who make their living bashing liberals.

Dronetek said:
Show me the prominent liberals who make their living bashing liberals.

Huh? Is that related somehow to one’s definition of a conservative?

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Spider lady says: See you took that as snark when all I was asking for is your defination of conservative. Bull

Michele, if I have anything to say to you it will be to your face. I don’t play games. I have only ever called you out on your hate. I comes through on every post you do when addressing a liberal. You came across as stupid which I am sure you probably arn’t when you couldn’t define what conservative means to you.

Since it is obvious that you and your Republican Party have cleaned out the moderates in your party that you only use the word for conservative to describe “fringe” right wingers. Look, the Dems have plenty of their own far left whack-jobs but we don’t usually disown them.

Since you have not answered me on the term “conservative” I have made up my own defination.

Spider lady, Show me ONE hate-filled comment of mine. And while we are at it, more people think the Dem’s are the party of fringe, moreso than the Repubs. But don’t let facts get in your way.

via the Hill:

44% of likely voters think that the Democratic party is too extreme, as opposed to 37% who think that the GOP is too extreme.

If shows attempting to present all sides — like Parker Spitzer — fail, it will be a reflection of the unwillingness of the cable audience to listen before forming an opinion. At 8 p.m. Eastern, cable viewers have a choice of a leftist, a rightist, or a balanced perspective.

seeing2012:

The survey was for voters in ten tossup districts done in early October. This was not a national survey.

http://thehill.com/house-polls/thehill-poll-week-2/124177-the-hill-poll-swing-district-voters-more-likely-to-see-dems-as-dominated-by-extremists-?sms_ss=reddit&at_xt=4cbbf3edf76390e2,0

So, what I got from this is that Spitzers head is stuck up his ass.

Cancon2 said:
So, what I got from this is that Spitzers head is stuck up his ass.

Which is different from where it’s usually stuck.

Spider lady,
Here are 2 comments you made about Palin:

The woman is a f–king idiot.

You people are fucking nuts on here. Tina Fay is a comedian. For gods sake let her be. First, this is not even news. So they post this and the idiots on here only know how to call names and thren get down in the gutter. The only reason you men stick up for Palin is that she makes a tickle go down your legs. Lets be honest. Palin is far from beautiful and has no brains. Just an example of how you Teabagging men choose their women.

Feel free to post any of my posts that equal that level of hatred.

gordonbloyershow said:
Parker Spitzer is a JOKE. Parker could not carry Palin’s hockey stick. How soon will this show be gone. Soon I hope.

I have heard that this show is so pitiful that its hosts are considering uploading YouTube videos of themselves ranting and insist on still calling it a “show.”

Just delusional, these people.

Parker continues to hurt herself with conservatives. CNN can no longer bill her as a conservative against the liberal disgraced felon of a governor. Parker admitted the only reason she got a pulitzer was because she bashed conservatives — she did that in order to win the prize.

Now she admits leading the negative press on Palin – she must be so proud to have participated in the character assassination of the republican VEEP candidate.

TfT said:
Parker continues to hurt herself with conservatives. CNN can no longer bill her as a conservative against the liberal disgraced felon of a governor. Parker admitted the only reason she got a pulitzer was because she bashed conservatives — she did that in order to win the prize.

Now she admits leading the negative press on Palin – she must be so proud to have participated in the character assassination of the republican VEEP candidate.

I didn’t realize a law was passed stating that every single Republican must love, embrace, and praise Palin. How dare Parker think for herself and criticize the GOP when she doesn’t agree with them?

TfT said:
Parker continues to hurt herself with conservatives.

MANY conservatives don’t like Palin! …or at least they don’t want her to be bc, she screwed up to many times, saying a vast plethora of to many stupid things! The media didn’t bash Palin; Palin did it to herself, the media merely covered it, while SNL and the late night talk show hosts played that up bc they knew it was funny and would get laughs.

As PBerg said…”Sarah Palin is nothing more than a loud, dumb broad who has the gift of gab! The media had nothing to do with making her look bad—-she was quite capable of that herself!!”

She’s more than capable, she’s absolutely guilty of it!

Many conservatives here like to point to Obama’s weak approval rating. Well, like it or not Palin fans, hers is pretty awful. 22% as of October 6.

Well, this is typical of the “balance” in the Leftist Media. Their reporting(?) is considered “balanced” when the Far Left and the Extremely Far Left are both represented equally. Ms.Parker about as close to being a political Conservative as Mr. Obama is to being a Swede.

paulmdoro said:
I didn’t realize a law was passed stating that every single Republican must love, embrace, and praise Palin. How dare Parker think for herself and criticize the GOP when she doesn’t agree with them?

Parker can do anything she wishes. It’s a free country, and she’s free to express her opinions. But, I believe that conservatives have a problem with Parker then representing the “conservative” view point to feign some balance, in an already heavily left-leaning show.

Parker is a lot of things, but conservative isn’t one of them, and I’m hard pressed to believe that she’s even a Republican. Don’t put Katherine Parker on a show with Eliot Spitzer, and then pretend that you’re producing a show with “diversity. You’re not. You’re producing a show with a far-left host and a center-left host. As usual on CNN, the right isn’t represented, at all.

And now everyone understands why this show has two viewers, which of course is only 4 viewers fewer than the entire network.

paulmdoro said:

November 12, 2010 at 2:08 pm paulmdoro(Quo

It’s not me, Paul. It’s most of America. Look at the ratings some time. Fox trounces the competition every night, in every time slot, every day, every week, every month, every year. And it’s lead gets bigger and bigger over time.

Or haven’t you noticed?

I sympathize with you. It’s hard trying to support censorship and political correctness in a society that allows free speech. Maybe you should send a mailing out to the millions of people who watch Fox each night and try to convince them to switch to the government-aligned media that take their marching orders from the party in power. Good luck!

The adulterer and the tramp…………a lovely pair of nothing.

Would someone on this site have the balls to check to credentials of the past five Democratic Vice Presidential candidates and/or elected? If we look just under the veneer of “service” you will see the truth. However, I feel that the Loons would not believe anything even if it smacked them across the face with a two by four! Clowns!!

Poor little Sarah. Woe is me. When the media asks her a question pertaining to something she said the media is being unfair.. When they ask her a question she doesn’t have an answer for it’s a gotcha question. And that’s fine, I guess. The sad part is all of the loons on that side that fall for her cowardly tactics and don’t get how manipulative she is. They’re buying into that it’s me against the world attitude of hers. They sympathize with her as if she was in the 3rd grade. Don’t ask her any tough questions.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Spider lady, Show me ONE hate-filled comment of mine. And while we are at it, more people think the Dem’s are the party of fringe, moreso than the Repubs. But don’t let facts get in your way. via the Hill: 44% of likely voters think that the Democratic party is too extreme, as opposed to 37% who think that the GOP is too extreme.

The Hiln good source for a change. YES, that rant was rather full of hate.

Parker was completely owned by John Ziegler…LOL It actually seemed like his own show