LOL

LOL

CNBC is still part of the family that has to promote the President!

The mission is to “Follow the orders from on top at all Costs”

Poor, poor FBN. Few fans. Never able to distinguish the line dividing business and economics from politics and ideology. No international presence. No credibility. 

You are a F*ing Idiot!

Sort of like you.

If Fox Business Channel falls in the forest, and no one is watching, does Neil Cavuto’s fat head shake uncontrollably?

All the Marys in Heaven! What a bombshell today in the UK! Evidence has surfaced tending to suggest that the Murdochs knew about the voice mail hacking from a very, very early date in the criminal conspiracy. From the Guardian:

“The most damaging of all is the implication that Clive Goodman, the royal
reporter jailed for hacking in 2007, was encouraged or induced by News
International executives to withhold the full truth about the extent of
hacking from police and the courts. The Goodman letter makes clear that he knew in 2007 what we all now know – that hacking was widespread at the paper.Second
to that in importance is the evidence suggesting Goodman was paid
nearly a quarter of a million pounds by the company after his release
from jail – a far higher sum than the company previously claimed, and
indeed a sum so high that to many eyes it suggests that News
International bought the silence of employees.
As for James Murdoch, he is haunted now by 10 words he uttered to MPs, which he will now have to defend: “No, I was not aware of that at the time.”
He
was telling Watson he was unaware of the famous “for Neville” email at
the time he authorised a half-million-plus payment to Gordon Taylor in
2008 to withdraw his legal case about hacking and remain silent. That
email offered – on any normal reading – firm evidence that Goodman had
not been the only News of the World reporter involved in illegal
hacking.
There were two people in the room with James Murdoch that
day in 2008. Both have now asserted firmly that not only was he aware
of the email, but it was shown to him there and then. They are Tom Crone, former legal chief of News Group Newspapers, and Colin Myler, former News of the World editor.”

Followed by the conclusion:

“James Murdoch, virtually the last man standing at News International,
may not be facing jail, but he will struggle to argue his way out of
this corner. When he appeared before MPs beside his father he chose a
strategy of bluster and blaming others. Predictably, those others have
bitten back and as a result James must be finished as a company
executive in the UK. It is very difficult to believe that a man so
compromised in this country could ever hold a global role at News
Corporation either.”

Fresh, big and exciting developments about this crime-riddled company!

This is kind of a non-story to me, but it does make me curious about CNBC’s motivations in down playing the downgrade.

You don’t raise a bad point. On reflection, it appears more and more like the S&P downgrade is a mistake, an anomaly. Today, Fitch reaffirmed US “AAA” status, so we have two (2) agencies, with Moody and Fitch indicating that the third, S&P was wrong. Now, we didn’t know that at the time of the downgrade. Maybe, CNBC was just being cautious, and FBN, wanting to vilify President Obama, over-stated the matter. Just an idea.

And still no body cares!

Who was that the real racist was putting down for cutting and pasting?  Itself?

People who abhor seeking the truth don’t care.

I’m no NewsCorp. fan, but, let’s remember when Fixed Noise was launched — it loss I believe somewhere north of $5 billion before it turned a profit.

Is Fox Business the channel that shows that same old scary mummy movie every day from 6-9AM?

So CNBC was being cautious in reporting that S&P had downgraded the United States?  What?  That doesn’t make sense.

They can argue that the downgrade was wrong, but they can’t be “cautious” about it having happened.

Source, please.

And aren’t you the one who normally argues about people “Staying on topic.”

Just admit for a moment that you’ve never seen the network, and would be saying this no matter what the network was about.

It’s a “FOX” company, so you hate it.  Just be honest.

The total ignorance FOX News? showed towards Ron Paul through the Iowa Polls has alienated me far away from the FOX channels.. They prove themselves totally un-news worthy and way to biased even against their own base. I don’t want Murdoch telling me who to vote for. I will make up my own mind. Fox totally lost it in shock and awe news reporting…  I can watch sitcoms on other stations..

All hail the narrative! TRVTH.

The fishing trip does look like the better choice to me.

This is the type of line that makes Real Royal crazy and make silly comments.

Fox buying ad time on Time Warner Cable means that they are boldly challenging a rival on their home turf.

Agree, going fishing would make for a nice break from having your head in the sand.

Does Real Royal ever make any comments that AREN’T silly? He sets himself a low bar every day.

CNBC being cautious reporting on the downgrade is like ESPN being cautious on the NFL lockout – IT’S THEIR FREAKIN’ JOBS to pay attention to that stuff!

Actually, dumbass, Fox has given Ron Paul more air time than the other channels, albeit not very much to begin with, but I don’t see much about him on MESSNBC or CNN.

Well obviously you missed the Iowa polls talking heads on fox.. talk about dumbass.. thanks for making yourself so clear..Murdochs nephew?

Follow the “Ailes” orders “”at all costs” and service only the “tea hates”,….. you’re right that’s “Fox”.

I’m not sure FOX Business will have that luxury, with Rupert’s criminal attorneys’ fees, prison bribes, Wendy’s hourly rate (double for GFE), etc. it will all soon be gone.

Yves Smith: Propaganda or ‘Uncertainty’?
We keep being told that uncertainty is the reason businesses aren’t
hiring. But Yves Smith Creator of the blog Naked Capitalism and author
of “Econned” explains why that excuse is not only destructive, but
“propaganda that needs to be laughed out of the room”.

http://youtu.be/JPa2s-HYuvE

Yves Smith: Propaganda or ‘Uncertainty’?
We keep being told that uncertainty is the reason businesses aren’t
hiring. But Yves Smith Creator of the blog Naked Capitalism and author
of “Econned” explains why that excuse is not only destructive, but
“propaganda that needs to be laughed out of the room”.

http://youtu.be/JPa2s-HYuvE

Yves Smith: Propaganda or ‘Uncertainty’?
We keep being told that uncertainty is the reason businesses aren’t
hiring. But Yves Smith Creator of the blog Naked Capitalism and author
of “Econned” explains why that excuse is not only destructive, but
“propaganda that needs to be laughed out of the room”.

http://youtu.be/JPa2s-HYuvE

Yves Smith: Propaganda or ‘Uncertainty’?
We keep being told that uncertainty is the reason businesses aren’t
hiring. But Yves Smith Creator of the blog Naked Capitalism and author
of “Econned” explains why that excuse is not only destructive, but
“propaganda that needs to be laughed out of the room”.

http://youtu.be/JPa2s-HYuvE

CNBC, where you go to not get the financial news you need.

Have you ever listened to some of the idiots they have on that channel?

They are the kicking toy of commenters at ZeroHedge.

Was that suppose to make sense?

What do you suppose the profit came from.  Inquiring minds want to know????

It obviously came from advertising dollars…but, it required deep pockets to sustain those loses for the first 5 years.