Some Very Confused People Are Going Nuts on SCOTUSBlog’s Twitter Feed
SCOTUSBlog is exactly what it sounds like: a blog covering the Supreme Court, and one that’s become a highly esteemed and almost indispensable resource for literal up-to-the-minute updates about Supreme Court cases.
But for the uninitiated it might just sound like the blog for the Supreme Court. In which case its Twitter feed is a wall for you to throw your mud at. Fortunately, SCOTUSBlog’s got a sense of humor about the whole thing:
It won’t be televised here MT @cjnkira: @SCOTUSblog you ruled against the working people, especially women, today. Revolution is coming.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
We thought blogging seemed very 21st century. MT @Iiuslep: @SCOTUSblog want to obliterate any progressive acheivement of 20th century.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Least we could do. MT @HeathNOLA: @SCOTUSblog oh they can still get coverage? How generous of you.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Failure of democracy. MT @Rockinwil: Time to do away with the @SCOTUSblog since they are no longer representing citizens of the US.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Um…… -Amy. RT @VictoriaaC0418: Hey @SCOTUSblog … Thanks for treating women like second class citizens.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
Sticks and stones RT @Im_X1: @SCOTUSblog You disgust me. The very antithesis of all the United States stands for. You all should be ashamed.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 30, 2014
[Image via Shutterstock]
——
>> Follow Evan McMurry (@evanmcmurry) on Twitter
New: The Mediaite One-Sheet "Newsletter of Newsletters"
Your daily summary and analysis of what the many, many media newsletters are saying and reporting. Subscribe now!
Comments
↓ Scroll down for comments ↓