Sarcasm. Hyperbole. Both are useful tools in a writer’s arsenal. When combined, they can make for rather incisive criticism of a person or idea. Take, for instance, Will Saletan‘s piercing satire of the thought process behind purging Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich for his anti-gay marriage views.
Like Andrew Sullivan and this young scribe, Saletan holds pro-LGBT views but happens to find the ousting of Eich distasteful. And so he took to his Slate column to mock the mentality of expelling businessmen from their jobs for having supported a loathsome 2008 California proposition that has almost nothing to do with their given job.
“Purge the Bigots” is the headline of Saletan’s sarcastic exercise. Noticing that 35,000 people donated money in support of California’s Prop 8 to ban same-sex marriage, Saletan mockingly suggested: “Why do these bigots still have jobs? Let’s go get them.”
If the language wasn’t clearly hyperbolic enough, one needn’t look any further than Saletan’s Twitter feed to understand he was only kidding. One liberal Twitter user seemed to understand that and attacked the writer, resulting in this:
— Will Saletan (@saletan) April 4, 2014
But don’t let any of that stop conservative aggregator/outrage machine WeaselZippers, who willfully misread Saletan and posted this blaring headline: “Lib Rag Salon Says Mozilla CEO Just The Start, Calls For Getting Every Executive Who Donated To Pro-Traditional Marriage Group Fired…”
1) The piece ran at Slate, not Salon; and 2) Saletan was, uh… being sarcastic.
There is a conservative meme that asserts Salon and Slate are one in the same, but WeaselZippers isn’t exactly a humorous site.
Either way, the commenters are having a field day. And it’s quite hilarious to see how many of them don’t actually click… the… link… to see that their humble aggregator got the publication and the entire concept of the piece wrong. Instead, they just go on about the “gaystapo” and invoke the Nazis. This comment is particular rich, considering Saletan’s piece is parody.
UPDATE: WeaselZippers corrected the publication to be Slate, and added a note:
After re-reaing the article it’s satire, in my defense Slate, Salon, HuffPo etc. post nuttier pieces than this on a regular basis as we’ve documented here countless times before.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]