Kiss of Death.

The Globe also approves of Markey, Frank, Kerry, Patrick and Mumbles Menino.

Wow! That should propel Huntsman right to the nomination and the White House!!

The people that reject Huntsman can’t read, so a newspaper endorsement isn’t likely to do much for him.

The left-wing media seems to like Huntsman.

Now, if only the voters agreed. 

He has spent a year trying to be the anit-Romney.  Maybe he should have tried being pro-Huntsman.

Turncoat has no chance.

Huntsman wants to be the Rick Santorum of NH.  He will be lucky to be the Huntsman of NH.

Huntsman has got to be the liberal media’s favorite GOP candidate of all time.  Again…he polls at 1%.  He has spent millions in NH and received the most favorable press/endorsements and still polls at only 7% there.  Please give it up guys.

ditto

It doesn’t matter. Huntsman is running in the cycle of the crazies. He and Paul are the only authentic candidates. Both Romney and Gingrich are flip floppers. Romney is a phony, Gingrich while intelligent is the most intelligent since Nixon. Santorum thinks that the most important issues are social, and the rest of them are done.

Everyone KNOWS that the Leftist media will ‘endorse’ whoever can most easily LOSE to their beloved OBAMO.

There’s absolutely no sense in (or legitimacy to) their ‘endorsements.’

Again, EVERYONE knows this to be true.

Everyone KNOWS that the Leftist media will ‘endorse’ whoever can most easily LOSE to their beloved OBAMO.

There’s absolutely no sense in (or legitimacy to) their ‘endorsements.’

Again, EVERYONE knows this to be true.

who ever the globe endoses is a democratic STRAW the globe is a lift wing whack job paper only use it to claen up my dogs shit

John Huntsman is not going to be president because John Huntsman is an arrogant douchebag; only Democrats nominate arrogant douchebag.  He connects with voters even less than Romney does – WAY less.

And, at least Romney went out there and made his own fortune.  Huntsman didn’t.

Hey, girlfriend!     Would you please go over to Gratewire.com.    Sign up and send me a message.  I’m Annie over there.      I can help you get back online at GW.   Geez, we miss you!   Take care.   

Yeah…similar to actions that should be taken after Jimmy Carter makes a statement, Generally it is wise to do the exact opposite of what the Boston Globe says….

Is your statement based off anything other than your standard worthless conjecture?

Hate to say this, but nobody cares what the Boston Globe (or most other hilariously self-important and increasingly irrelevant regional newspapers, including the risible Des Moines Register or stupendously stupid Manchester Union-Leader) “thinks.”

The fact that he’s the only candidate with a clear conservative record..  You guys are conservatives right?  Nope, your’e frauds.. Or the fact that he has no baggage like flip flopping, wives, birtherism, new letters, blah people etc..  You guys are the party of “principles” right? Nope, you’re frauds.. He has foreign policy experience.. He’s worked in public and private sector… It is clear that he’s your best candidate by a mile yet you reject him.. Conservatives in a nutshell right there..  Liberals aren’t trying to play a jedi mind trick to get you to choose him we’re pointing out how fraudulent and silly you look.. we’re mocking you not trying to trick you..

Well, before you make yourself look even more stupid while “mocking” because the GOP base is not favoring the candidate you think they should, lets make a little comparison…shall we?

Going back to 2008, you had Hillary Clinton, and your boy wonder, Barrack Obama.

What foreign policy experience did Obama have that put him over hillary?

What legislative accomplishments did he have that put him over hillary?

What executive experience did he possess that made him the better choice over hillary?

What was his economic stance in the context of the recession that made him more viable?
See….here’s the deal.  Back in 08, you did have a candidate who showed a capacity to be a statesmen, and you picked the one who sold you platitudes and generalities with a smile.  And the results of your collective silly choice are here for all to see today.
 
You can mock all you want….but similar to being insulted by a child, your mocking is irrelevant as much as it is ironic.

FYI: the journalistic joke known as the boston globe is owned by the lunatic-left bible and chief propaganda organ, the “All The News That’s Fit to Fake” NY Times. Like the times, the globe is nothing more than a sham of a joke of a travesty of a parody of a farce of a newspaper.  Naturally, these leftist d-cRAT socialist stooges would favor the most leftist RINO in the pack.

As is expected from the likes of you, your joke makes no sense.  If the people that reject Huntsman can’t read, then they’d hear from other sources, radio or television, that he’d gotten a newspaper’s endorsement and, knowing that smarter people than themselves had checked off on him, his support would increase.

On the other hand, if this particular newspaper’s endorsement isn’t likely to do much for him, then obviously people more inclined to support him (considering that it’s owned by the NWT and is one of the papers furthest left in the country) – that is – the people closer to your political persuasion – are implied as being the people who can’t read.

If people that reject Huntsman can’t read, then they wouldn’t be able to find such pleasurable amusement in your getting it wrong.

So you are comparing Romney to Obama(who you hate) and Huntsman to Secretary Hilary Clinton (who you think was our better choice as President)  .. Yet you’re pulling for Romney to win..  You sir are an idiot..

Then that’s pretty much their own fault, isn’t it?  I mean, if these papers were relevant to their communities, their diminishment of importance wouldn’t have occurred.  If they’d have held representatives or local politicians feet to the fire for their votes, exposed obvious corruption or cronyism when it could’ve been had or reflected the values of their readership, they wouldn’t be going away.  But they much rather had pushed national party lines and conventional wisdom onto their customer base.

Not to mention that articles run in my ‘major newspaper’ routinely are littered with grammatically errors, graphical mistakes and incorrect spellings.  Editors no longer seem to exist as species.  So its no surprise at all when in reading stories one finds critical facts buried in the midsection or bottom of articles, obvious questions never asked or editorial content dripping from straight news stories.  If it weren’t for the coupons, they’d be shuttered already.

First off, please show me where I’ve made any statement in support of Romney, until then, keep your idiot comment for yourself.
 
Regarding to the rest of your drivel, the comment I made was directed at your premise that the GOP base is not selecting the most qualified individual.
 
So, if that is true….I’ll ask you again to please substantiate why you collectively saw Obama as more qualified than Hillary.  Here are the questions again to help your thought process.
 
1)What foreign policy experience did Obama have that put him over hillary?
 
2)What legislative accomplishments did he have that put him over hillary?
 
3)What executive experience did he possess that made him the better choice over hillary?
 
4)What was his economic stance in the context of the recession that made him more viable?
 
Extra Credit:  How was Obama’s academic performance in comparison to Hillary’s that could support the idea that he is more intelligent than her?
 
 
The point is, if you can’t even substantiate your own selection in 08, then you look pretty stupid mocking anybody’s selection for 2012.
 
Understand now?

Bought and paid for by whom? The Bush administration of course. We should totally elect this guy as President, because he wouldn’t expand the wars into other oil rich territory. Never.

This thread is NOT about Obama tard (and no I’m not ducking).  This threads about Huntsman.. any thoughts on what I wrote about him?  I’ve angrily and positively posted on  Obama threads  for 4 years..  Any thoughts on the actual thread topic?.. I said why I feel the Boston Globe is right .. You tell me why they are wrong..  Don’t worry i’ll wait..

Conservatives will want to know if Huntsman disavows this endorsement.  I would if I were him, not that it matters. 

He polls like Dennis Kucinich Mr. Zero Percentage.

Did the Boston Globe support George H.W. Bush against Michael Dukakis (a two term governor from Massachusetts) or Bill Clinton (merely a two term governor from Arkansas)???????
Note George H. W. Bush’s credentials- impeccable, if not the best credentials that ANY President has had!

Born in Milton, MA
Youngest aviator in US Navy at the time.
War hero in WWII
Yale University grad
Started an oil company and was a millionaire by the age of 40
2 term U.S. Congressman
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.
Chairman of the RNC
Chief of the Liaison Office to the People’s Republic of China
Director of the C.I.A.
2 term Vice President of the United States

I am starting to wonder if Huntsman, beloved by the Left-wing media, is simply setting up for a run for the Presidency four years from now- as Romney did after losing to McCain. As with Romney, Huntsman has tons of money, thanks to his father, to keep a presence in Iowa and New Hampshire for the next four years and can do like Romney has done and keep supporters in all fifty (not 57!) states until the next election cycle. Money CAN buy you an election if you’re ambitious, motivated and organized!

No one wants to be Santorum lol

“I’m the decider.”  George W. Bush, arrogant douchebag extraordinaire.

What a waste of an endorsement. 

They would be correct… he IS the most qualified on the Republican side.   

Well, the people of Utah sure liked him…he left office with approval ratings over 80%. 

Compare that to Romney, who left with a 34% rating.

Personally, I don’t get some of the conservative animosity toward Huntsman.

He got conservative policies DONE in Utah that most Repubs only run their mouths about.

-Flat tax  (done)
-Vouchers (done)
-Eliminated corporate franchise taxes
-heathcare tax credits  (no mandates, no govt takeover).

Glad to see you back!! =)

The Republican ideology has become essentially incoherent and self-defeating.  

Today’s Republican party has basically talked themselves into a rhetorical corner.

Rather than being the party of smaller government and supporting market-based solutions, etc, they’ve become so paralyzed by their opposition to Obama. 

They’re so opposed to the notion of government doing ANYTHING that they can’t allow themselves to present a clear vision for solving the problems that face the country.

Their solution for the multitude of problems facing our country is to have the government do absolutely nothing.  

You’re probably right…and I think that if the Republicans can ever get past this  far-right, reactionary phase that they’re in, Huntsman would be a compelling candidate.  His credentials are simply unmatched by anyone in the race.

But right now, the Republicans are caught in this anti-intellectual, anti-everything mode, which prevents thoughtful, rational candidates from coming forward.

I mean, so what if the media likes Huntsman?   Us liberals have spent the last 3 years listening to the Right bitch about how the media is “in the tank” for Obama.   

Don’t you think it would actually be nice to have a Republican candidate that the media took seriously??   Or would that just take away your “we-hate-the-media” talking points?

McCain thought the media “loved” him, too- boy was he wrong. The media spends so much time propagandizing for Obama and his agenda that the public has awakened to their bias. They jumped the shark when Hillary ran against Obama and have been exposed for the propagandists for the Democrat Party that they are. 

They’ll only like Huntsman until he is running for something against a Democrat, then the love affair will end.

Not quite…the media loved McCain until he sold out and stopped being a “maverick” so he could get the Republican nomination.

Thanks!