WOW: The NY Times Assigns An Editor To Watch Fox News


504x_GlennBeck_ACORN.flvClark Hoyt, the New York Times ombudsman thinks the paper should stop running scared from Glenn Beck. Hoyt took the Times to task this weekend over their coverage (or lack thereof) of the ACORN and the Van Jones debacle, both incidents which arguably developed into national stories due to their flames being relentlessly fanned by “the polemical world of talk radio, cable television and partisan blogs.” A world, says Hoyt, that the Times has trouble dealing with.

But for days, as more videos were posted and government authorities rushed to distance themselves from Acorn, The Times stood still. Its slow reflexes — closely following its slow response to a controversy that forced the resignation of Van Jones, a White House adviser — suggested that it has trouble dealing with stories arising from the polemical world of talk radio, cable television and partisan blogs. Some stories, lacking facts, never catch fire. But others do, and a newspaper like The Times needs to be alert to them or wind up looking clueless or, worse, partisan itself.

Apparently part of the problem is that Times editors do not watch enough Fox. Or any Fox as the case may be. Says Jill Abramson there was an “insufficient tuned-in-ness to the issues that are dominating Fox News and talk radio.”

Some editors told me [Hoyt] they were not immediately aware of the Acorn videos on Fox, YouTube and a new conservative Web site called BigGovernment.com. When the Senate voted to cut off all federal funds to Acorn, there was not a word in the newspaper or on its Web site. When the New York City Council froze all its funding for Acorn and the Brooklyn district attorney opened a criminal investigation, there was still nothing.

Which is a major problem. You may not like Glenn Beck, you may think he is a nut job. You may think what he does is not journalism, you may think that in a perfect world of objective, reasoned, researched news reporting he should not have a place. But you ignore him at your own peril. Actually, there is the argument to be made that the Times ignores him at everyone’s peril — it is their job, after all, to watch and report on things the rest of us may not have the stomach for or any interest in. They are supposed to be watching Fox News so that other people don’t have to, not the other way around.

According to Hoyt the Times has recognized this and assigned an editor to watch Fox(!) along with a bunch of other sites they don’t normally like to sully themselves with “to brief them frequently on bubbling controversies.” Ha! They should just read Mediaite more. Alas, managing editor Bill Keller “declined to identify the editor, saying he wanted to spare that person “a bombardment of e-mails and excoriation in the blogosphere.” Good luck with that.

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


11 comments

  • Dan Abrams Dan Abrams says:

    Who are the rest of “us” who may not have the stomach for, or interest in Beck? It sure seems a lot of people at Mediaite watch him on pretty regular basis! I would go a step further, whatever you think of his politics and/or worldview, the guy is one of the most entertaining hosts on television!

  • I think by “us,” the writer means the average media-employed New Yorker. I can’t think of anyone who’s actually watched Glenn Beck, other than now you, Dan, but most people just wildly hate on Fox because of the soundbytes they see on The Daily Show.

    I’ve recently relocated to the west coast, and when spending time with my family, who loves Fox News, I’ve come to appreciate at least how they’re presenting facts. More to the point, ignoring one side of the convo, no matter how much the figureheads pander to that viewpoint and play fast and loose with facts, doesn’t do anyone any good.

    Love this: “Actually, there is the argument to be made that the Times ignores him at everyone’s peril — it is their job, after all, to watch and report on things the rest of us may not have the stomach for or any interest in. ” Couldn’t agree more. They should live and breathe Fox News issues, simply to be debunking them, or enhancing Fox’s legitimate reporting.

  • JimW JimW says:

    Glynnis completely outdoes her usual incomprehensibly biased and lunatic self with this line: “You may not like Glenn Beck, you may think he is a nut job. You may think what he does is not journalism, you may think that in a perfect world of objective, reasoned, researched news reporting he should not have a place.” Truthfully, I think that Glynnis should hang it up and apply for a job at ACORN.

  • Pam1151 Pam1151 says:

    @JimW Glynnis is saying exactly what I think of Beck. But I agree with her, that we ignore him at our own peril. It is much better to know what is going on with someone’s brain than NOT.

  • JimW JimW says:

    Hi Pam1151, I get it that what Glynnis said is what both you and she think, but it bothers me when someone presents a story in such a blatantly biased manner. It’s kind of laughable that Glynnis takes umbrage with Glenn Beck when she does the same thing. Liberals always set themselves up as somehow being above the prejudices of more conservative people, but in reality, they are every bit as nasty and biased. That said, Pam1151, you are awesome and I love reading your posts and I would never in a million years think that our disagreements are anything but friendly jousts. :)

  • gk33435 gk33435 says:

    Make me watch FOX News as part of my job? What editor is getting punished by getting that assignmentt?

  • Pam1151 Pam1151 says:

    Jim, Jim I think I am sometimes consertative about some issues. Really, honest. I just can’t watch Fox anymore. I did years ago but it has really gone to the dark side these days!!!

  • Puter Boi Puter Boi says:

    I’m just glad that Dan Abrams has become more visible on his own site. He’s the only reason I ventured here in the first place. A voice of sanity in a business inhabited by its share of loons.

  • ChrisNH ChrisNH says:

    The New York Times bears watching, too, and thankfully Fox News is there to report on what they say in their newspaper and what they don’t say. It’s the height of arrogance to think that everyone at the NYT is somehow ‘angelic’ and full of good intentions. In point of fact, the reason the NYT is not eager to go up against Fox News is because Fox News will gladly go toe to toe with them and uncover rocks the Times would rather not have uncovered.

  • ChuckfromTacoma ChuckfromTacoma says:

    If that poor editor is forced to watch Fox News 4,5 or 6 hours per day, several days per week, that editor just may learn what we, the “idiots” have learned. There is more than one side or view to any given story. What if that editor figures out why we are so pissed off at our news presenters and analysts as well as government and completely agrees with us. Next thing you know, he/she will vote conservative or at least consider all options with an open mind.
    Dayum, I hadn’t smoked that stuff in 25 years. It really is more potent then I remembered.
    Back to reality.
    (and let the ED watch MSNBC a little to avoid shock and mental health issues)

  • ImNotBlue ImNotBlue says:

    If the NY Times thinks this issue facing them is that “they’re not watching enough FNC,” they’re wrong. The issue is that this story was out there BEFORE it made it’s way to Beck’s desk… and the NYTimes should have been all over it. At what point did the newspapers (and especially this newspaper) decide it’s role was to play catchup?

    Where is their spirit of journalistic inquiry? Where is their effort? Do they wait on the sidelines because they simply don’t investigate Democrats… or have they simply forgotten how do to anything more than regurgitate AP stories?

    This is the NYTimes saying, “We know we’re behind, but on some of these stories, we’re going to stay behind… and let FNC (and other networks) do the work for us.” If that’s really their idea of “fixing the problem,” they have signed their own death certificate.

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    The Seven Best (Or, Somewhat Memorable) Moments Of The Jay Leno Show

    video

    After 95 episodes, the epic failure known as The Jay Leno Show airs its final episode tonight. Of course, Leno himself will be back after the Olympics, comfortably at 11:35pm all over again. Which was pretty much the problem to begin with - the 10pm offering started as a similar product to the Tonight Show, and only became more like the old format as time went on.

    No Surprise Here: FNC Dominates Ratings For Palin Tea Party Speech

    ratings

    • With all three cable news networks carrying Sarah Palin's tea party speech and Q&A after on Saturday night, Fox News was the clear winner in the ratings. During the 9pmET hour, FNC had more viewers in the A25-54 demographic than MSNBC, CNN and HLN combined. In total viewers, Fox News had more than double the combined total of the other three cablers.



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS