Who’s More Dangerous To The GOP: Obama Or Glenn Beck?
Anita Dunn, the White House communications director who is leading the Obama administration charge against Fox has revealed that the decision to become “more aggressive in both protecting our position and in delineating our differences with those who were attacking us” was a “fundamental” one that was made in August. Short version: right around the time the health care bill was being dangerously derailed by the town hall-ers and Van Jones was being done in by Glenn Beck. Point being, this wasn’t necessarily a case of the White House losing its temper, as has been suspected, and acting rashly (and arguably, stupidly).
This from a two-part series Politico is running:
President Obama is working systematically to marginalize the most powerful forces behind the Republican Party, setting loose top White House officials to undermine conservatives in the media, business and lobbying worlds…Obama aides are using their powerful White House platform, combined with techniques honed in the 2008 campaign, to cast some of the most powerful adversaries as out of the mainstream and their criticism as unworthy of serious discussion.
Whether they will be successful is another question. One already gets the sense that there is a backlash in the works about the administration’s blanket dismissal of Fox as a news organization — shows at 5 and 9pm does not an entire network make. However, perhaps Obama is just taking advantage of where the wind is blowing.
A staggering 83 percent of all independents surveyed said they don’t trust Republicans to make the right decisions. It’s impossible to credit the Obama White House for these numbers, however. Republicans can claim the bulk of the responsibility after a decade of scandals, unpopular wars, unprecedented spending and a broad loss of public trust.
Much has been made of the GOP’s lack of leadership in the last year — it’s a huge void that appears to be currently being filled by the likes of Glenn Beck (and shortly, Sarah Palin). As popular as Glenn Beck is, long-time Republicans are not thrilled at the prospect of having Beck and his cohorts speak for the party at large. So perhaps Obama’s decision to treat the shows at 5 and 9 and opponents (and therefore equals on some level) really is the quickest way to delegitimize the party and convince a whole lot of people the inmates have taken over the asylum.
15 comments
Anyone who is not in the media or a right wing tool knows that Fox is not “news”. The talking point that Beck, Hannity, et. al. are different than Fox’s news reporting is ridiculous. Other than a few Democratic lawmakers appearing from time to time to provide “balance”, every story is reported as a criticism of the left. I defy anyone here to provide any example of a Fox “news” story favorable to health care reform, global warming, Obama’s foreign policy, etc., etc.
Look at this article and tell me this is a legitimate news organization:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/the-ten-most-egregious-fo_n_327140.html
People like Glynnis here are so afraid to call Fox propaganda because they don’t want to burn any bridges with Ailes and Murdoch. You see it everywhere. With Fox consolidating the media, they might be working for them someday.
> Anyone who is not in the media or a right wing tool knows that Fox is not “news”.
Calling Fox “news” is like calling CNN or MSNBC “news”. It’s just one holding up a mirror to the other. Olberman and Matthews are no better than Beck or O’Reilly.
> I defy anyone here to provide any example of a Fox “news” story favorable to
> health care reform, global warming, Obama’s foreign policy, etc., etc.
And that’s good, or else they’d be CNN/MSNBC, which will be happy to sing the praises of all of the above for you all day long. Why does a story need to be favorable to the administration in order to qualify as news? Whatever happened to speaking truth to power? Oh, that’s right, it went out of style back in January. Baaaaa.
By the way, I defy anyone to provide any example of a CNN/MSNBC “news” story that was favorable towards Bush. Or does this definition of “news” only apply when a Democrat is in office? (Next week, on Self-Answering Question Playhouse…)
> Look at this article and tell me this is a legitimate news organization
You’re right, they really should get it together and start acting like a real news organization… ascribing fake racist quotes to Rush Limbaugh, pawning off fake National Guard documentation, ignoring any story that casts Obama or the left in any kind of negative light unless and until they absolutely have to (Acorn, Van Jones, etc., etc.), refusing to vet and conspiring to elect utterly unqualified presidential candidates… that sort of thing. Now THAT’S what I call news!!!
I defy anyone here to provide any example of a Fox “news” story favorable to health care reform, global warming, Obama’s foreign policy, etc., etc.
———————————————————-
I think the problem is that most people (including Obama) look like they dont have the guts to go on FOX and say here is where I stand, here is why and if you disagree lets have a good old fashioned barnburner debate because I know I am right.
If Obama and company cant sweep the floor in a debate with Hannity (ex construction worker) or Beck (overgrown disc jockey) then he really does have a problem.
It would have been nice if Glynnis had pointed out the facts about the poll numbers Politico is using. I don’t think anyone in their right mind buys the WP/ABC news poll. Its a totally bogus poll. His approval ratings are significantly higher in that poll than the others. Its a total outlier poll that Politico is basing this whole poor article on.
I defy anyone here to provide any example of a Fox “news” story favorable to
> health care reform, global warming, Obama’s foreign policy, etc., etc.
Really, can you provide anything favorable about this administration nationalizing the Banking Industry, the Auto industry, the Health care industry and soon the Energy industry and our absolutely empty foreign policy? That would be “news” right there. And, buying it all with money we do not have? If you think the Repubs have hosed us, then you have to agree that the Dems have too. They all do the same thing…they do whatever it takes to get votes. If you think for one second that the Obama’s, the Rangels, the Boehners, Rahm Emanual, Nancy and Harry and all the rest think about you getting Health care or anything else but getting votes, you are from another planet. Votes are power, and right now the Dems have it. A decade ago the Repubs had it. Before that the Dems again. There is NO change you can believe in. Start thinking for your self and then the light bulb will go on!
In Response to the first post. Fox at least calls its “commentary” shows commentary! Unlike the great pretenders like “MSLSD” Or “Communist News Network” that pretend their commetary is really “news”. Anyone with half a brain knows that the 3 hour block of commentators are just that… commnetators, opinion shows… if you don’t like the opinion don’t watch. But last I checked, Until Obama burns the Constitution, we still have the right to free speech, including commentary and opinion.
Wiseguy, consider yourself defied.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/21/obama-expanding-bailout-small-banks-businesses/
Before you go firing off uninformed posts and revealing yourself to be a thoughtless reactionary, you might take 5 minutes to look at Fox News’ web site and, wonder of wonders, reading the stories.
Some are clearly written to rankle the Administration (see, that’s my open mind at work), but others, like the link above, prove Fox can do a story that makes Obama look good.
Eat it.
I’ve watched FNC enough to learn the following:
1. Plenty of right-leaning oppinion shows. Some so much so that they are not worth my time.
2. If I want to see a two-sided debate, FNC has an abundance of it each day.
3. If you want excellent straight news reporting, Shep Smith is your man.
4. Bill O’Reilly thinks health care reform and the public option are acceptable ideas.
5. Bill O’Reilly thinks Glenn Beck is a nut job.
6. Glenn Beck IS a nut job.
7. ‘Red Eye’ is one of the best shows on daily TV, far funnier than John Stewart or Colbert.
straitshooter – here’s 10 of Cluster- Fox’s most egregious distortions all in one link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/the-ten-most-egregious-fo_n_327140.html
I would offer more, but I’m not posting every second of Faux-News in a comment.
The only thing this Amateur Hour Oracle is doing is marginalizing himself. He keeps on proving that he is not ready for prime time and should still be doing Community Organizing with Acorn on the Southside of Chicago. For instance: He is spending 3 hours talking to far leftwing LIBERALS like Rachael Maddow and Keith Olbermann at the Whitehouse this week, but he could only spare GENERAL MCCHRYSTAL 25 minutes to talk about AFGHANISTAN!! If this isn’t gross incompetence, I don’t know what is. And furthermore, the Jihad he has waged against the Fox News Channel, the Conservative citizens of this country, and Rush Limbaugh is an ABUSE OF POWER! He’d better hope he is able to retain the HOUSE next year.
5. Bill O’Reilly thinks Glenn Beck is a nut job.
——————————————————————————————————-
WRONG! Bill and Glenn Beck are good friends. Glenn Beck is NOT a journalist but has broken more hard news stories than that Liberal TWIT, Shep Smith or any “main stream” journalist. The BEST news guy now that Brit Hume has retired is Bret Baier, not Shep Smith.
I defy anyone here to provide any example of a Fox “news” story favorable to
> health care reform, global warming, Obama’s foreign policy, etc., etc.
——————————————————————————————————————————————–
There are diverse opinions among those at Fox News. Geraldo Rivera is a boot licking Obamabot and thinks everything the fool does is just great. Shep Smith is a Liberal who sides more with Obama. The “hard news” people do NOT give an opinion on anything, they just report the news. The OPINION guys like Glenn Beck and Hannity are totally opposed to the Marxist Messiah’s agenda and speak out BOLDLY about it. WTG, guys!!
Ingenieux, if your only source is a web site which clearly hates Fox News, then you have no sources, and as such, you have no argument. Try a little heavy lifting. Go to the Fox News web site, go through their stories and find one with a factual mistake. If they are, as you claim, an illegitimate news organization, then this should be easy. You need to broaden your information sources. Huffington Post and Media Matters are every bit as biased and untrustworthy as Newsbusters.
to Sunnyr…Get a LIFE! McCrystal was chastised by Gates (who served under Bush) for “going public.” In the Chain of Command…from the Military to everyday life…you go through the Chain of Command…NOT the media to tell the President what his personal Wish List is…No ONE has ever conquered Afghanistan….from Genghis Khan to Alexander the Great to the British to the Russians….So why does McCrystal think we can do it now? Besides, aren’t we spread too thin for being the World’s Policeman? Especially, when no else is helping out, Karzai’s brother is a major Opium smuggler and Karzai’s last “election” was rigged?
Why send our young men and women there when no one else wants to? We wasted the last 8 years in Iraq.
SunnyR says: The only thing this Amateur Hour Oracle is doing is marginalizing himself. He keeps on proving that he is not ready for prime time and….
Until that point SunnyR, I really thought you were talking about Glenn Beck. Amateur Hour Oracle. Priceless!
- » Karl Rove: 'Fox News Is Fairer Than MSNBC'
- » Watch: MTV Bans Lady Gaga/Beyonce's "Telephone," CNN Reports (Update)
- » SNL's Toyota Prius Commercial Is Out Of Control
- » Bill O'Reilly: 'Tom Hanks Has Gone Off The Rails'
- » 5 Best Fashion Moments In Gaga And Beyonce's "Telephone" Video
Predictably, Fox Contributor Wants Lady Gaga Video Banned: ‘This Is Just Poison’

So, this was probably inevitable. Sandy Rios, Fox news contributor and president of the Culture Campaign (the name alone should send some warning signals) told Megyn Kelly that she thinks Lady Gaga's latest (jaw-droppingly awesome) video "Telephone" featuring Beyonce should be banned from MTV. Three guesses why.
Would A Christiane Amanpour Hiring Drastically Change This Week?
In a surprise move, FishbowlDC is reporting longtime CNN anchor and foreign correspondent Christiane Amanpour has been offered the ABC Sunday morning show This Week anchor job. She was initially thrown into the mix for the vacant role earlier this month. But thel hiring of Amanpour would signal a major direction shift for the future of This Week.
More TV headlines:
»Hardball Re-Air Finishes With Less Than 100K In Demo
»FBN Adds Another Business Personality: Former CNNer Gerri Willis »1
»MTV To Air Jersey Shore To Actual Italians, In Italy »1
»Surprise! Some People At Fox News Are Jealous Of Glenn Beck’s Success »58
»CNBC’s Steve Liesman Tells Rick Santelli: “You Were Wrong About Everything” »5
© 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives
| Dan Abrams, Founder
| Hosting by Datagram
|
RSS





















