Your Newest Congressional Media Star: Rep. Joseph Cao


video

cao_11-8We all know the stars of the House of Representatives – Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, John Boehner.

But every few weeks one of the 435 other congressmen and congresswomen bubble up and into the media spotlight – and now it’s Rep. Anh Joseph Cao’s turn.

Recently, it has helped to be loud and disruptive, like Joe Wilson and his “you lie” comment or Alan Grayson and various hyperbolic statements. Also there’s Michele Bachmann, whose “Super Bowl of Freedom” has helped increase her spotlight.

But Rep. Cao made his waves by casting an important vote – as the only Republican to vote ‘yay’ on the health care bill Saturday night.

Part of the reason the vote is so significant is it allows Democrats to say there was bipartisanship involved, and it means the GOP leaders like Eric Cantor can’t claim a 100% whip-ping of his party. But also, there’s what RNC Chairman Michael Steele said on ABCNews.com’s Top Line last week:

Candidates who live in moderate to slightly liberal districts have got to walk a little bit carefully here, because you do not want to put yourself in a position where you’re crossing that line on conservative principles, fiscal principles, because we’ll come after you.

In a CNN interview yesterday (below), Cao laughed off the quote, reminding Steele how the GOP celebrated his victory just last year in a traditionally Democratic district. He said Steele “has the right to come after those members who do not conform to party lines, but I would hope that he would work with us in order to adjust to the needs of the district and to hold a seat that the Republican Party would need.”

The reason behind Cao’s yes-vote came after two key events occurred: first, the Stupak amendment was added, banning government funding of abortion (Cao is pro-life). Secondly, Pres. Obama made his pitch to Cao, and he promised help with recovery from Katrina. Conservatives seem to have mixed feelings on Cao’s vote. Quin Hillyer of The American Spectator writes, “Conservatives need to take a deep breath, relax, and stop bashing Joseph Cao,” because, “Cao did not hold out for just some ridiculous pork project favored by big-money lobbyists; he instead asked for help with local issues caused by THE GREATEST NATURAL CATASTROPHE THAT EVER HIT THIS NATION.”

Meanwhile, Michelle Malkin asks, “Can’t the GOP do better?” She notes Cao voted yes simply for a commitment from Pres. Obama: “You know what that’s worth: Nothing.”

Cao had a short interview this morning on Fox & Friends and will likely be seen elsewhere on the dial as the day and week progresses. Will he keep the backing of his GOP buddies or get Scozzafava’ed next year? Welcome to the spotlight, Joseph Cao…

Here’s the CNN interview:

—–
» Follow Steve Krakauer on Twitter

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


7 comments

  • ImNotBlue ImNotBlue says:

    I still don’t understand why the focus should be on Cao… and not the 39 Democrats who broke rank. Seems that 39 are more important and influential than 1… but perhaps that would take more work that the media is willing to put in.

  • timzank timzank says:

    Imnotblue…If they (the MSM) paid attention to the 39 Dems, that would be “dissing” their own (Dems)…No news there, move along. Gotta be a Republican out there causing headaches for his party.

  • ImNotBlue ImNotBlue says:

    Well, tim… I think that’s part of it. But I was serious when I said it was more work than they’re willing to put in. Doing a story on 39 Democratic defectors would take a long time to put together, and they’d have to talk to a lot of people. It’s easier to hype one person, and just interview them. Laziness, combined with bias, is responsible (IMO).

  • I disagree, guys.

    The “winning” side will get the attention. If there had been enough Democrats voting no that the bill didn’t pass, those Dems would be getting the majority of the attention (in my opinion).

    With the vote passing, the GOP defector gets it. In fact, if there were two our three, they may get less attention, but because there was just one, it adds a different wrinkle to it.

  • ImNotBlue ImNotBlue says:

    Steve Krakauer says:
    November 9, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    With the vote passing, the GOP defector gets it. In fact, if there were two our three, they may get less attention, but because there was just one, it adds a different wrinkle to it.

    Well, I think that does agree with what I’m saying. The ONE guy is much, MUCH easier to cover than the 39 guys. But that media laziness, not a good thing.

    However, I’m not sure I agree with the notion that if it hadn’t passed, the Democratic defectors would get the attention. After all, we’ve seen a number of these debates throughout the past few months, and it seems to be “the Republicans” who get associated with stopping Obamacare, when it’s really more about the Democrats within their own party. They control everything by a wide margin… but still haven’t been able to put through anything until now. The Republicans can try as they might, but without the Blue Dogs or other Democrats, there’s not much they can do. The closest they get to bringing up that point, is attacking Lieberman, but that’s fits in with the media’s SOP, as they hate him almost as much as the blue-blogs do.

    I think the media is hesitant to attack or talk about those guys with any specificity for a number of reasons:
    -It hurts the Democrats to point out dissention
    -Even a Blue Dog is still a Democrat, so an attack that creates results could effect the balance of power
    -Most Blue Dog’s don’t want to be publicized nationally, because national attention could hurt their re-election campaigns… best to stay local
    -There are enough of them to make reporting difficult… again, too many to talk about

    IMO, bias combined with laziness is the culprit.

  • TfT TfT says:

    The newest GOP member to get all the attention because he went with Pelosi. Although his vote didn’t make a hill of beans difference, since he voted yes, only after Queen Nancy already had the 218 votes she needed to pass the bill.

    Matters not though, he gets the attention because he went against the GOP and that makes him a shining star with the liberal media.

    Who were those 39 democrats? (Media: duh, we don’t know and we don’t care).

    Bias galore.

  • Stephanie Stephanie says:

    At least he was being open and honest with what he was doing – keeping his constituents in mind when he was voting. I do not think, though, that one Republican makes a bill bi-partisan. And there are media outlets who agree with that. http://www.newsy.com/videos/lone_republican_votes_for_health_care_reform

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    John Edwards Sex Tape Controversy: Geraldo Interviews Andrew Young

    video

    In case you missed it, here are some key concepts surrounding this bizarre story: Presidential Candidacy, Baby Dady, Mistress, Sex Tape, Cover up and Mastermind. The players? John Edwards, Rielle Hunter, Elizabeth Edwards and Andrew Young (former staffer to the Edwards presidential campaign.) Yesterday, Geraldo Rivera interviewed Young about the existence of the so called steamy sex tape, a video of which follows

    Fox News Sees Profits And Viewership Rise, Cable News Competition…Doesn’t

    This year's annual State of the News Media, put together by Pew, is a comprehensive look at the entire media world. But let's take a look at the cable news section - and the all-important race between Fox News, CNN and MSNBC.



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | Dan Abrams, Founder | Hosting by Datagram | RSS