New York Times Buyout Package Discloses Insider Secrets


ny_times_chi_fire_mhsLast week, news spread that the New York Times would need to cut 100 of its 1,250 editorial staffers by year’s end. But instead of just flat-out firing people, the Times decided to lead with a buyout option open to any newsroom employee, which they delivered to everyone the next day.

And when the packages arrived, via UPS Next Day Air, they had some surprising details, as uncovered by the New York Observerwho managed to snag an envelope. The buyout, the Observer is reporting, consists “generally” of “three weeks pay per year of service and up to two years pay for longtime employees.” Times editor Bill Keller explained the option thusly:

[T]he Company will be sending buyout offers to everyone in the newsroom. Getting a buyout package does NOT mean we want you to leave. It is simply easier to send the envelopes to everyone. If you think a buyout may be right for you, you have up to 45 days to decide whether you will accept it or not.

As before, if we do not reach 100 positions through buyouts, we will be forced to go to layoffs. I hope that won’t happen, but it might.

In essence, the paper would dare its employees to consider themselves safe in a twisted journo-job version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma.

 

The paperwork also includes a list of every single Times employee, sans name, by “department, job title, birth date and age,” including “the printers, the security guards, the reporters.” Then, the Observer broke down some telling numbers:

Editors at the Book Review: 14

Number of Pressman Journeymen at the College Point plant: 106

Reporters at Metro: 50

Size of the Opinion/Editorial Department: 49

Size of Sports Desk: 57

Critics in the Culture Department: 18

Editors at The Times Magazine: 21

Average age of the Obituaries Desk: 58 years old

Size of Thursday Styles: 7

Size of Business Desk: 85

Size of Washington Bureau: 45

Size of the Dallas Sales/Advertising Staff: 4

Size of Week in Review: 5

Total size of Art Department: 113

Size of Dining: 5

Size of Metro: 103

It’s no secret that the paper has been bogged down by a bloated staff and excess legacy costs when nearly every other giant paper in the country tops out at around 700 editorial employees to the Times‘ 1,250, but these numbers are revealing. On one hand, it’s impressive that such seminal sections as the Dining and Thursday Styles run on such little manpower, but a team of 103 for the Metro section of an international paper? Let’s just say it will be interesting to revisit this list again in 3 months, one year and again in five.

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


1 comment

  • b.j. b.j. says:

    I don’t really read the city sections of the paper, since I don’t live there and don’t have much use for it, but I thought the same thing. It is still a force in the city, but more so, I imagine, because the city itself is a news force, and the paper itself is arguably the most powerful in the country. I just can’t imagine why the paper needs so many reporters for that section. Why not ship them off to other bureaus and try to do what they are doing with San Fransisco, which is retain a loyal readership, possibly juice the numbers in a small way, and then grab some local advertising in cities like Los Angeles and wherever else the paper has an office? I know the San Fransisco strategy was supposed to me more the exception than the rule, but it seems like half the staff could be bought out and most of the remaining staff dispersed to both help the financial situation and retain talent.

    Or why not try to spin off the city section into a free newspaper? If it’s composed the right way–a strong, quick focus on sports and stuff for the guys to read on the subway, for instance–and if the numbers work out, so that local advertising, perhaps different for each borough, it could essentially subsidize the main paper. Plus, there’s no reason why these people couldn’t still contribute to the Sunday Magazine or something.

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    Newsweek Writers Discover Sexism Is Not Dead At Newsweek (Or Elsewhere)

    Well, kudos to Newsweek. Four months after being the subject of some heavy-handed, headline-making accusations of sexism following a questionable Sarah Palin cover to heart, the magazine has subjected itself to the inspection of three of its young female employees, who have lately come to the conclusion that actually sexism is not dead. Turns out they didn't have to look far.

    Politico Shocked, Upset To Find Congressmen Enjoy National Media Attention

    To most people that have ever spent more than ten minutes of their lifetime's exposed to professional politicians, the fact that they will use anything and everything to claw their way into the national spotlight comes as no shock. To Politico's Jonathan Martin, it's an unsettling new side effect of the national conversation in health care reform.



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | Dan Abrams, Founder | Hosting by Datagram | RSS