Not surprisingly, the Buffet secretary nonsense is…nonsense.

“Warren Buffett’s Secretary Likely Makes Between $200,000 And $500,000/Year”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2012/01/25/warren-buffetts-secretary-likely-makes-between-200000-and-500000year/

What’s your BLOOD MONEY income, Tawana?

Paid by NBC News!

That’s NBC News people!

NBC News!

And a lot of it depends on the circumstances.  If they had just sold a small family plot, they’d be pissed about the 15% tax on the gain.

If Warren Buffett is so upset that his secretary “pays” a higher rate than he does, why doesn’t he “pay” her in stock options, then they will be on a level playing field.  Conversely, if Buffett took a salary in lieu of stock options, they would also be on a level playing field.  This is apples and oranges, and the Democrats know that their minions will never bother to research the difference. 

The money made by ANYONE who is NOT running for president is not even an issue. Why even ask the question? Just like WBuffet stepping in with his crap about what he feels would be fair. WHO ASKED? Buffet aint running for office. The bottom line is in the 80s these issues were discussed. A great GREAT GOP president (the GOP’s feelings) even said he felt it was wrong that a waitress pay more, proportionately, in taxes that a millionaire. In the end, the whole discussion is a word-play game for all of us watching. Will things change under Obama? I doubt it because they haven’t changed in nearly 20 years.Why this is a hot topic is very easy to understand, SUDDENLY the economy matters. Meanwhile I have countless saved emails from during the “Bush years” and they all have the same headlines “SOME NUMBER of employees, laid off by SOME LARGE FIRM”. WHY the American public doesnt remember this stuff (even though MOST movies even mention the “bad economy” from the early years of the 2000nds) is amazing. Perhaps we were too busy waiting for “alert colors”.. 

Thanks for the heads-up info Gloves, but why didn’t NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, the AP or NY Slimes tell us that?

If Sharpton ever put his salary out on the air, there would be a bunch of relatives and bill collectors calling all the time and Al doesn’t want that.

What are you trying to say?

What we have here is a strawman, be careful cus they burn easily.

That he fomented racial tensions on numerous occassions, resulting in a multitude of deaths, and NBC hires him as a HOST!

That STENCH you’re smelling is HYPOCRISY!

He should be asking why Sharpton isn’t in jail for tax evasion..

A smell VERY familiar to (R)epublicans

If you are looking to get likes from people who already hate, you are fine.
If you are tying to convince others, you might want to explain your statement

“Is it fair that Buffet pays less of a tax rate than his secretary?”

It’s a BS argument.

Buffet is taxed on his INVESTMENTS.

The secretary is taxed on her LABOR.

The rates for both is DIFFERENT. 

If, for example, The Secretary is also investing money, and makes profit off of those investments, then THAT money will be taxed at THE SAME RATE as the money Buffett makes off of investments.

Comparing the rate off of INVESTMENTS, to the rate off of LABOR, is an apples and oranges argument.

Proofreading Can Be Your Friend !!!

Widdle-Dee, Widdle-Dum;
2012 Be Lots Of Fun!

Will it be freedom or Communism?
(heh-heh)

Resist He Much.

In just paying his taxes Sharpton becomes news as it is something that he apparently has not always felt compelled to do…  It is funny that Sharpton who is a millionaire BTW, would question the amount that anyone else pays since he himself refuses to pay his fair share.  

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_07IWNHjSuyRhuooAQHxM9N 

This crap shows the length that Obama will go to win reelection to a job he has fouled up beyond all recognition. Rip the country apart with class warfare and envy and ” fairness”? No problem, if you vote for Barry one more time.

Then he’ll do whatever the hell he wants to us.

I’m glad Somebody said it before me. I know I harp too often on useage, punctuation and spelling, but this sentence from a “Professional writer” is APPALLING:

 It was the sort of debate where short questions against repeated at each other and slide through the air, ships passing in the night, unanswered.

I can overlook mistakes like “died” for “denied”, but JEEZUS, Frances, this is disgraceful. 

Instead of hiring interns for all these posted positions, why not try a proven professional, Dan? Or at least someone who understands the whole noun-verb relationship!

Sharpton is a loon!

That is a sophism. A person needs money in order to invest. 

As long as the secretary’s labor is taxed at a higher rate than the investor’s returns, the chance the secretary will become a significant investor is slim. If the secretary does manage to invest, it will have to be low risk. 

So we are back to the unfairness of Buffet, with so much money he can afford to risk chunks of it, being taxed at a lower rate than his secretary. 

A multitute? Seriously, how many deaths? 

aw..aw..aw..aw..aw..I axed you if it is fair….blah blah blah. Boy, it’s amazing MSNBC ratings are at the bottom. SNL couldn’t do a funnier comedy skit!! Al is a ebonics speaking joke.

So this is what America is going to become?  Envy is one of the seven deadly sins.  No one should practice it.  Get out there and make your own.

“useage”

Nice “useage”

because he’s using the gap between his secretary and himself as an EXAMPLE of what’s wrong with our political economy. Even if he did as you suggest, it wouldn’t do anything to correct the imbalance between the tax rates of those who work, and those who can invest.

busted.
Usage. 
Still not as bad as:
 It was the sort of debate where short questions against repeated at each other and slide through the air, ships passing in the night, unanswered.

Like trying to assemble IKEA furniture

Why does it matter if Sharpton is part of the one percent? He is willing to have his taxes raised. I read the same argument about Michael Moore, which did not pass the barrier of sound logic.

Yeah, that too, but I was replying to ricciricci’s unreadable manifestos.

Most people do both, not one or the other.  The Dems are playing games, attempting to divide people by class.  Apparently, it works with you.

Breaking News” Obama can not prove that he is eligible to be a candidate in the 2012 race. His lawyer’s letter that he will not take part in the hearing, to me, is a confession that he can not prove that Obama is a citizen and does not want to perjury his self in a court of law.
Please post this on all the blogs. Send to your friend. Live hearing tomorrow.

He’s free to raise his own taxes anytime he wants.  He can write a check to the Treasury for any amount he wants, any time.  He doesn’t want his taxes raised.  He want’s Democrats elected. 

Obama entire speech will go on the garbage heap of history. It is not worth talking about. I do have an interesting piece of news for you guys. 

Breaking News” Obama can not prove that he is eligible to be a candidate in the 2012 race. His lawyer’s letter that he will not take part in the hearing, to me, is a confession that he can not prove that Obama is a citizens and does not want to perjury his self in a court of law.Please post this on all the blogs. Send to your friend. Live hearing tomorrow. 

Breaking News” Obama can not prove that he is eligible to be a candidate in the 2012 race. His lawyer’s letter that he will not take part in the hearing, to me, is a confession that he can not prove that Obama is a citizens and does not want to perjury his self in a court of law.
Please post this on all the blogs. Send to your friend. Live hearing tomorrow.

hahahahahahah….buffets secretarys salary was exposed on the news blogs several weeks ago….she makes 60K a year……..nice try though……i can only imagine what you would do for buffet for 500k a year…hed even buy ya the knee pads

Difference being, Buffett’s secretary is NOT paying a higher rate than him. 97% of Americans pay less than 15% on their income taxes. Thats an indisputable fact form the IRS. Unless buffett’s secretary is earning $200k…. she is paying a smaller rate than Buffett.

Also, Buffett already paid taxes on the money he is investing with…..investment money is after tax money…. so IF you even make a profit…you get taxed at 15%….if you dont make a profit, and LOSE money, you can only deduct $3,000 from your income. Is that fair?? Someone risks $10 million on a business, that business goes under and investors can only deduct $3,000…. and you think millionaires arent paying enough taxes??

Don’t you remember 9/11/2001, that put a damper on just about everything.All the airlines was grounded nothing was going on people didn’t know what to expect, was we going to be attacked again or not that was a rough time for everyone .It is always amazing how people forget.

Where is the link? Her income has never been disclosed. Blogs are not news…. FYI….they are opinion.

Warren Buffet = Job creator

Gloves Donahue = Unemployed internet troll

Hmmm, I wonder who I’ll side with.

60k and she pays higher taxes than Buffet who makes billions MORON.

Another TEABAGGER put in his place.

Warren Buffet = Job creator

Gloves Donahue = Unemployed internet troll

Hmmm, I wonder who I’ll side with.

Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Mr. Jablonski:

I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings (“OSAH”) has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will “suspend” participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.

As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State’s Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.

In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.

I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this
matter.

Sincerely,
Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State 

But chris I, she put the word EXAMPLE in capital letters, so she must know what she is talking about.  AmIRight?  ~sarc

But chris I, she put the word EXAMPLE in capital letters, so she must know what she is talking about.  AmIRight?  ~sarc

Michael Jablonski
260 Brighton Road, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
michael.jablonski@comcast.com

RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Mr. Jablonski:

I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings (“OSAH”) has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will “suspend” participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.

As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State’s Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.

In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.

I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this
matter.

Sincerely,
Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State 

Take your sexual insults and shove it ______.

What The Hell Is That All About ??

There won’t be a word about it on the mudstream media.

you think ? The teabagger seemed to start getting the upper hand when he asked al about his income .

It is being carried live and we have to spread the news via net. I want to hear the evidence. I used to think that this was not an issue. It so simple for Obama to put and end to this but he wont. I am now thinking there may be something to it.

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: without_hate@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:38 PM
Subject: [mediaite] Re: Al Sharpton Ignores Tea Party Congressman Repeatedly Asking ‘What’s Your Income?’

Disqus generic email template

Charles Ulysses Feney wrote, in response to without_hate:
There won’t be a word about it on the mudstream media.
Link to comment

To be willing and actually paying those increased taxes are not the same.  People need to know the difference between how earned income (as from an actually job) and money used  (thats already been taxed once before investing) for investing are two different things and are taxed differently.  This is from the IRS not any political party!

If this country is so unfair why do we have such an legal and illegal migration into this great country?  If anyone wants to make money sacrifice and do it.  At first it can be hard.  Eventually if we put our all into it we will reap from the hard work.  Why should anyone work hard, earn their money, pay their own bills and then have part of it taken to give to those who do not have motivation to improve their lot in life? This class warfare is BS.  We are a capitalist country and everyone has the opportunity to better themselves.

A few things

Here’s a link with the story MORON.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2012/01/25/warren-buffetts-secretary-likely-makes-between-200000-and-500000year/
She actually likely makes between $200,000 and $500,000 per year.

How about I shove it up your @$$?

Stupid IDIOT I never asked you for a stupid link.  Idiot can’t even think outside what Fox News tells him.  Now go F your sister.

Key word: likely. Far from definitive and also from a GOP leaning publication. Horrible way to try and prove your point.

100 thumbs up.

You all SERIOUSLY have to stop with this bull@#$% that there is a conspiracy around every corner. ANYTHING can be interpreted to confirm your point of view if you spin it the right way. We have SERIOUS problems in this country and you all are dredging up this crap again about President Obama not being a citizen?  PLEASE STOP SHOWING HOW HIGH THE LEVEL OF YOUR STUPIDITY CAN GO AND CONTRIBUTE TO A REAL DISCUSSION…    The deficit, Imbalance of trade, out sourcing of jobs to China, the buying and corruption of our country by mega-money special interest, the financial industry NEVER being investigated for their reckless and ultimately DESTRUCTIVE disregard that almost made this country a memory. SOMETHING REAL!!!!

She either makes between $200,000 – $500,000, or Obama is lying about her tax rate.

The moron, Fat Albert doesn’t understand that we’re all overtaxed, and most of us are double taxed, triple taxed, and quadruple taxed.  You should pay tax once, on what you earn, and that’s it.

Sharpton doesn’t want to admit that the good liberals over at MSNBC pay him like an unproductive field slave.

Not only does Al Sharpton need a speech coach, he also needs a Tax Attorney. It is reported that he owes the IRS for back taxes, and fails to mention that his income is up at the 5% level. OK that puts him in the lower 99%.

He did…to the FEC…morons. Please keep this up. It only digs a hole for the GOP nominee who will be forced to call his own base ignorant racist idiots.

No…it’s not. They are both INCOME that they LIVE on. 

Taxed multiple times? All of us? Like this:

http://i.imgur.com/OqJSN.gif

Also, remember that any time someone gets a tax cut, that’s money that has to come out of somewhere else, usually from spending that would benefit…oh almost everyone in the lower 99% bracket.

So Sharpton’s not a socialist then?

lol,

“No Mr. Lincoln. It is in fact YOU union guys that are the TRUE slave holders!”

Her income isn’t the point. The point is that people who get income from capital gains or ”carried interest”versus  wages pay less in taxes because the tax rate on capital gains is so low. It remains low because rich people, who fund campaigns and hire lobbyists want it that way.

You do know the meaning of “Likely” ?
I did not see anywhere in that article where it actually reported what her income was..did you?

So, yesterday (or was it the day before), Big Ed referred to Obama as “the boss” and last night he particiapted in a democrat retreat and mediaite is suddenly silent on the goings on of the MSNBC staffers?

I wonder why?  snicker. 

Nope…you are incorrect… the lower rates on investiment is part of the incentive to invest and take risk with money that has already been taxed…

There are different taxation rates for earned income and investment income.

Sharpton pays zero percent taxes because all his income is derived from shakedowns.

The Rev. Al Sharpton owed at least $1.8 million in back taxes before striking a sweetheart deal with the feds last summer that chopped the bill almost in half and kept him out of the slammer, The Post has learned.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_07IWNHjSuyRhuooAQHxM9N#ixzz1kZlHSfWf
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/al-sharpton-net-worth/ - $5million

http://pfds.opensecrets.org/N00001109_2002.pdf 

It’s ridiculous for Sharpton to repeatedly ask if it’s fair, when it isn’t a truthful question. And talk about using talking points! How many times does he use the Democratic talking point word *fair*?

Al sharpton is an ignorant sack of shit.  he’s asking if an argument based on flawed reasoning and logic, and outright lies is fair.  this is why no one takes this moron seriously

Again- posting the same comment over and over again in unrelated stories is inappropriate.  Please refrain from your spamming – it will be flagged.

Again- posting the same comment over and over again in unrelated stories is inappropriate.  Please refrain from your spamming – it will be flagged.

Most socialists don’t advocate socialism for themselves, just the masses. 

If the lower 45% who pay nothing would have some “skin” in the game, maybe they wouldn’t be so eager to live off the producers.

You’re right, about some of it. But cause and effect

Investment income is taxed at lower rates because it has already been taxed at 35% at the corporate level.  Love it when people who don’t know the tax code talk like they do.  I spent 20 years doing tax returns….and the upper income earners do pay….and almost 50% of the country pays nothing.  Talk about fair?

The investment income has already been taxed once, and if you knew anything about the tax code you wouldn’t argue the fact.

Al and Jesse having the same stupid moments together.

This ‘RaceBaiting/Huckster’ has made tons of money by extortion, running for POTUS, when he KNEW he had NO chance of winning, but wanted those ‘funds’ along with the matching ones. Oddly, he was Never questioned about those finances, as MOST were afraid to be called ‘racist’.  When does using that Race Card STOP? They have run it into the ground, as a means of “hiding behind it, to intimidate, bully and lie their way to prosperity.  They, being these so called reverends: Sharpton, Jackson, Wright etal.  They have “Lived Large” by perpetuating race into EVERY aspect they can exploit for financial gain.  Sharpton IS, and ALWAYS WILL BE A CON’/HUCKSTER.  Amazing he is given a show, where he can tout HIS racism, when in fact he comes off sounding so dumb.  Where is
the IRS in looking into this con-protected by Obama/Holder, for sure.

Alfraud Sharpton still owes taxes since he stole all the money from his so/called 2004 presidental campaign.He keeps calling Romney Willard which is his true name,maybe we should call Obama Hussain?Everyone knows that M.S.N.B.C.takes their orders from Obama and the Democratic party.I would’nt be supprised if Obama himself hired this incompetent,racist.hatermonger himself.

They pay different taxes.  He’s paying capital gains tax.  The GOP has been calling for tax reform and streamlining the code for years now.  The Dems and RINOs aren’t having any of it.  They’ll talk about the “unfairness” of the tax code, but not do anything about it.  And Buffett is a snake.  Who benefits the most from the Keystone Pipeline not being built.  Who owns that railroad?  The BNSF?  anyone? 

Being old hasn’t many advantages, except remembering the TRUTH of real facts.  I remeber the last National Leader of a nation loved and fought for Labor Unions and hated and taxed the rich. The Party???? National Socialists of Germany. The leader????   Adolph Hitler.   Go look it up!!!

I’m not wealthy but do invest and will have to pay the same as anyone else.   I use to envy the wealthy and then I realized they worked harder than I did and deserve their wealth.  If I had been willing to work harder and invest my time in learning more, maybe I would be better off.  But I don’t think those who are wealthy shld be hated because without them…..folks, most of you wouldn’t be working!!!!!!!

Your comment(s) are unrelated to this story and you posted it twice….Hypocrite.

Poor Al “axes” a question irrelevant to the conversation and gets flustered when he can’t get an irrelevant answer.
He is still in “Resist  we much” mode.

Why didnt this guy mention that Buffet and Romney arent paying income taxes. They are paying capital gains taxes, which is different. That is the reason they pay less, the money is being risked in investments. Its not considered income to be taxed by an income tax bracket like everyday people think of.

Obamas father was not a citizen therefore his child can not be natural born citizen. Obama is a least a dual citizen period…INELIGIBLE
What a tangled web we weave when we practice to decieve.

are you really that stupid?

how about you look up effective tax rates…you are a total sap and a kool-aide drinker
after all the normal deductions the average taxpayer pays 10-15% 
44% wind up with refunds more than they paid in

oh snap

The simple answer here is that the 15% and the 35% tax rates are fair, The 15% is on investment monies that had already paid the 35% on previous earning. The 35% rate is on earned income which everyone pays that is earning income. Congress decided that the 15% rate was need to stimulate investment in American business to create jobs. There is no fairness problem here, just a timing difference on what percentage you are currently paying which applies to everyone.

Hey Al.  Warren’s secretary earns over $375,000 a year.  She is not some poor little secretary earning $30,000 a year.  NO ONE pays 35% of their income earning $30,000 a year.

In fact Warren’s secretary is part of the evil rich who by his definition earn more than $250,000 a year. 

Al better get your facts right.

Hey all you of you talk about “fairness”  I am sick and tired of “fairness” word.  Go ask any Republican or Democrat if they pay too much in taxes. 

You know what all would say heck yeah.  A tax increase is good when it effects some rich guy, but a tax increase is terrible when it effects you.

Taxes have nothing to do with fairness.  The bottom line is the government spends too much of our money.   The government should figure out a way to work with less instead of playing this class warfare.

I have good Democratic friends who like to find ways to pay lower taxes.  Sort of makes me question their loyalty.

….His argument has no logic because Sharpton himself gets paid million$ by MSNBC to be an IDIOT!!…His Tax Return would implicate him as an Modern Day House Negro always trying to stir up the massess with his hypocrisy!!…SHOW US YOUR TAX RETURN!…When Rush Limbaugh was attempting to purchase the St Louis Rams football team Sharpton stirred up the massess prompting some Black football players to suggest that they would not play for him!!…That’s not logical because I don’t know of anyone in the NFL that would turn down a 4 year $60 million dollar contract with a $20 million dollar signing bonus because Sharpton encouraged them to do so. Him becoming an NFL owner had nothing to do with the business of football which is to Win Super Bowls!!…When it comes to Sharpton, its all about HIPOCRISY!! 

When it comes to al sharpton you need to read this
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/633/al-sharpton-the-democrats-david-duke

Your argument is so stupid! He’s already the PRESIDENT. Come out from under that rock and get a new argument that makes sense. 

That’s just wrong.  If you’re born here, you’re a citizen.  There are confirmed local newspaper articles from Hawaii announcing the birth in August 1961 and a birth certificate has been released.  People are spreading lies about this because they want to keep people thinking that President Obama is scary and foreign. 

get over it and get on to a real issue.   

She does not earn 60k! On the Today show she said she pays 35.8% on her income. According to the 2011 tax rates, that would put her above 379K in total income! 

The amount is not the point, its tax equity,  Buffet beleives that people like him should pay a tax rate at least equal  to his secretary. I mik upper level salary and I find it repulsive that billionaires pay a lower tax than me and unlike many upper level income earners, I do not want to make a billion, so I am not protecting my future tax interest

Why didn’t you mention all the real Republicans, not Rhinos that pushed Clinton to give China favored status? We had a Republican House and Senate, a lot of the same that are there today.

We are not speaking of direct investment, we are talking about my broker who taking my money and investing and taking a 15% tax loophole.  Also, paying more capital gains tax will not stop people from investing, if it did Vegas would not make any money, because those winnings are tax at a regular rate

You are likely a racist idiot, you cannot have it both ways, you “guess that Warren’s secretary made $200-500 thousand dollars. You say it sarcastically like that justifies her higher tax rate compared to his 15% rate, then you will turn around and say people that make $200-500 thousand a year are not rich. I will go along with the idea that politicians have fouled up this country, but only because that is what the 1% are paying them to do. War on!

You are so full of it! Most of the wealthy were born into it, they didn’t “work hard” take your talking points to the FOX news crowd, they are dumb enough to buy them. Sorry Mom and Dad.

Georgia State Office of Administrative Hearings Judge Michael Malihi ruled that subpoenas demanding the presence of Barack Obama in his Georgia courtroom on January 26th along with the original form of his Hawaii birth certificate and information on his myriad Social Security numbers will remain in force.

Obama ‘s attorney Michael Jablonski had filed a motion to quash those subpoenas, arguing if Obama were made to answer questions before the court it would “…[require] him to interrupt duties as President of the United States…” (1)

It was also Obama’s claim that “presidential electors and Congress, not the State of Georgia, hold the Constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates.” (1)

Well Judge Malihi did not agree with Obama’s arguments that the laws of the State of Georgia were somehow irrelevant to the process, or that his presence in the court would materially interfere with his ability to discharge the duties of his office.

In his decision to allow the subpoenas to remain in force, Malihi wrote, “…Defendant (Obama) has failed to cite any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that testimony…is irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.’ ” (2)

In short, as Judge Malihi so eloquently put it, “”Defendants motion to quash is denied.” (2)

The process before Judge Mahili began when a number of Georgia residents filed 3 separate lawsuits demanding that Barack Obama provide evidence of having met State of Georgia election law requirements before being placed on the ballot. Malihi agreed with the plaintiffs, quoting in his ruling Georgia law which states “…every candidate for federal office shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (3)

In that ruling, Mahili stated “the court finds that the defendant (Barack Obama) is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (3)

Though Obama has managed to ooze his way out of legal responsibilities and requirements in the past, this time it really might be a bit thick for the acting president. Even the radically leftist Southern Poverty Law Center has decided to weigh in, giving vent to a typically childish attack of spleen in its “Hatewatch” column no less, where it snivels “…Malihi’s decision has been heralded far and wide as a defining moment for those who have hounded Obama about his lineage.” (4)

Apparently demands that Barack Hussein Obama actually abide by the laws of the land and the Constitution of the United States make for a clear case of “hounding” to an organization known to file suit at the drop of a conservative hat.

Here’s hoping Judge Malihi’s courtroom turns liberal petulance to leftist rage on January 26th. For Malihi’s ruling that day will determine whether or not Barack Hussein Obama may be certified by the Democrat Party to appear on the Georgia ballot in November. And as the Liberty Legal Foundation explains it, “without such a certification from the Party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election.” (5)

Georgia State Office of Administrative Hearings Judge Michael Malihi ruled that subpoenas demanding the presence of Barack Obama in his Georgia courtroom on January 26th along with the original form of his Hawaii birth certificate and information on his myriad Social Security numbers will remain in force.

Obama ‘s attorney Michael Jablonski had filed a motion to quash those subpoenas, arguing if Obama were made to answer questions before the court it would “…[require] him to interrupt duties as President of the United States…” (1)

It was also Obama’s claim that “presidential electors and Congress, not the State of Georgia, hold the Constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates.” (1)

Well Judge Malihi did not agree with Obama’s arguments that the laws of the State of Georgia were somehow irrelevant to the process, or that his presence in the court would materially interfere with his ability to discharge the duties of his office.

In his decision to allow the subpoenas to remain in force, Malihi wrote, “…Defendant (Obama) has failed to cite any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that testimony…is irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.’ ” (2)

In short, as Judge Malihi so eloquently put it, “”Defendants motion to quash is denied.” (2)

The process before Judge Mahili began when a number of Georgia residents filed 3 separate lawsuits demanding that Barack Obama provide evidence of having met State of Georgia election law requirements before being placed on the ballot. Malihi agreed with the plaintiffs, quoting in his ruling Georgia law which states “…every candidate for federal office shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (3)

In that ruling, Mahili stated “the court finds that the defendant (Barack Obama) is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (3)

Though Obama has managed to ooze his way out of legal responsibilities and requirements in the past, this time it really might be a bit thick for the acting president. Even the radically leftist Southern Poverty Law Center has decided to weigh in, giving vent to a typically childish attack of spleen in its “Hatewatch” column no less, where it snivels “…Malihi’s decision has been heralded far and wide as a defining moment for those who have hounded Obama about his lineage.” (4)

Apparently demands that Barack Hussein Obama actually abide by the laws of the land and the Constitution of the United States make for a clear case of “hounding” to an organization known to file suit at the drop of a conservative hat.

Here’s hoping Judge Malihi’s courtroom turns liberal petulance to leftist rage on January 26th. For Malihi’s ruling that day will determine whether or not Barack Hussein Obama may be certified by the Democrat Party to appear on the Georgia ballot in November. And as the Liberty Legal Foundation explains it, “without such a certification from the Party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election.” (5)

Georgia State Office of Administrative Hearings Judge Michael Malihi ruled that subpoenas demanding the presence of Barack Obama in his Georgia courtroom on January 26th along with the original form of his Hawaii birth certificate and information on his myriad Social Security numbers will remain in force.

Obama ‘s attorney Michael Jablonski had filed a motion to quash those subpoenas, arguing if Obama were made to answer questions before the court it would “…[require] him to interrupt duties as President of the United States…” (1)

It was also Obama’s claim that “presidential electors and Congress, not the State of Georgia, hold the Constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates.” (1)

Well Judge Malihi did not agree with Obama’s arguments that the laws of the State of Georgia were somehow irrelevant to the process, or that his presence in the court would materially interfere with his ability to discharge the duties of his office.

In his decision to allow the subpoenas to remain in force, Malihi wrote, “…Defendant (Obama) has failed to cite any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that testimony…is irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.’ ” (2)

In short, as Judge Malihi so eloquently put it, “”Defendants motion to quash is denied.” (2)

The process before Judge Mahili began when a number of Georgia residents filed 3 separate lawsuits demanding that Barack Obama provide evidence of having met State of Georgia election law requirements before being placed on the ballot. Malihi agreed with the plaintiffs, quoting in his ruling Georgia law which states “…every candidate for federal office shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (3)

In that ruling, Mahili stated “the court finds that the defendant (Barack Obama) is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (3)

Though Obama has managed to ooze his way out of legal responsibilities and requirements in the past, this time it really might be a bit thick for the acting president. Even the radically leftist Southern Poverty Law Center has decided to weigh in, giving vent to a typically childish attack of spleen in its “Hatewatch” column no less, where it snivels “…Malihi’s decision has been heralded far and wide as a defining moment for those who have hounded Obama about his lineage.” (4)

Apparently demands that Barack Hussein Obama actually abide by the laws of the land and the Constitution of the United States make for a clear case of “hounding” to an organization known to file suit at the drop of a conservative hat.

Here’s hoping Judge Malihi’s courtroom turns liberal petulance to leftist rage on January 26th. For Malihi’s ruling that day will determine whether or not Barack Hussein Obama may be certified by the Democrat Party to appear on the Georgia ballot in November. And as the Liberty Legal Foundation explains it, “without such a certification from the Party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election.” (5)

I agree lets make everything fair and lower everyones tax rate to 15% and shrink the federal government accordingly.

Al has been conning the left idiots for twenty years and they’ve never known it. He is no more a reverend than he is a martian. How is Tawana Brawley these days Al? Suckers!

KInd of retarded to have someone who currenlty owed the IRS back taxes and penalties trying to talk to us or the congressmen about “fairness” with the tax system.  15% to 30%(even though 30% is the wrong number) does seem “unfair” on it’s face.  but “fair” has a different definition for everyone.  Is it fair for 1 person to pay Millions a year in taxes while 1/2 the country pays 0!!????

What rock did you crawl from under! Wow…everybody knows Obama is a citizen! Are you a citizen? I am black and that is an insult. I AM AN AMERICAN! I have to ask all though I don’t owe you shit….Is it the color of his skin that infuriates you! Obama is a good man! And he WILL be President again! OBAMA 2012!

You’re swallowing too much RW BS and are continuing to look like a fool!  This is going nowhere since he has presented a LEGAL birth certificate.

I was watching and I a would have ignored the rude bagger also.  What did Al’s income have to do with anything?  He isn’t running for office.

Move to Somalia and bask in your tax free utopia!  The most civilized countries on earth (NW Europe) host the happiest, healthiest and most educated populations with the highest living standards.  5466ron- How do you propose to spend your earned income credit this year?  Ignorant Crackers like you are minimum wage types.  BRAHAHAHAHAHa

You wonder why upper imdle class blacks like myself never vote GOP because you always use racist reference to plantations and quite honestly if Crackers like you are on the other side, I stay on the Democratic plantation, rather than the Republican Plantayion

Al WHO??? He is still around old news blow heart never shuts up sad part can never understand him he should be doing a Jenny Craig commercial

Inviting Al Sharpton to comment on any Republican, is like inviting the Hells Angels to a party…….Al Sharpton owes just under 4,000,000 in back taxes for him to make any comment about Romney is hypocritical, of course be will do his best to cast a bad light on any rich white man anyway.

The elite have been exploiting and dumping on the rest of us for quite a few generations now, and when we say “ouch”, that’s class warfare? 

His mother was a citizen and he was born in the United States. Each one of those makes him a citizen.

Those ARE the RINOS and it’s time for them to go…TERM LIMITS APPLIED RETROACTIVELY.

Correct.  As long as corporations make a profit, they will continue; They will have to soon accept a lower profit margin on thier goods because they are not paying their employees enough money.  They will need to focus on making their money off of quantity and not marking-up their items at huge profit margins.

That is an item within the Federal Income Tax system; They are taxed less on that type of income.   To say that it isn’t an income tax, is a “pants on fire” statement.

The point though is, that they need to revise the capital gains tax levels.

Al Sharpton is irrelevant in society………

Albert Sharpton was ordained when he was 9 or 10 as a reverend while he was attending a Pentecostal church. He later became a Baptist minister. His work(?) is now Political and mostly Racist or Racial subject matter mixed with hard line radical political racist agenda’s. Why is he still given the title of Reverend? Why is his organization given a tax free ranking when it is clearly a personal vendetta on the American Racial and Political lines of society and Government? Al Sharpton is NOT a Reverend or a Minister or a Preacher. These titles are all reserved for people who actively carry out the duties of a religious organization. Christian Church by the Wikipedia definition of Reverend or Minister.
 I believe Al Sharpton [ no I will not call him Reverend, he is not deserving and he is not the leader of any Christian Church, he is a Racist political activist, purely factual.] Sharpton in my personal opinion is nothing more than an agitator to keep racial and racist subject matter festering in the hearts of Black and White political oponnents for personal gain. He is actually a racist radical Radio personalty who must continue to keep his agenda wild and controversial in order to continue working and making money. Sharpton has dipped his pen into the political scene several times and found that even the black population won’t support his views enough to be elected to political office. He rean for president in 2004 and was poorly received even by the Black voter base and dropped out. Basically Al Sharpton, in MY personal opinion, is nothing but the blow fly in the ointment of American racial relations and everything he touches turns to something stinky and only fit to throw away.
 I can’t for the life of me understand why or how any sane human being could take Al Sharpton or any of his rhetoric as serious or even truthful. Al Sharpton is the most ridiculously unbelievable and pathetic example of political racial bull poop to have ever picked up a story and attempt to get something done. He was even told by Black leaders in New Orleans after Katrina to stay out of N.O. and not attempt to help because they believed he would do more harm than good!
 Al Sharpton makes a lot of money spewing hate and lies about many subjects only to fill his pockets with money. He is not a minister, reverend or pastor by any facet of the definition of the words. He is one of  the most brainless, biggest mouthed, stuffed shirt, blow hard, radical black racist ding bats I have ever had the displeasure to listen to. He actually makes me sick to my stomach. An ignorant purveyor of words he has no idea what they mean and enough loud mouth propaganda to sink a Battleship in ten minutes without a solid base of followers. His opinions of Tea party or any other political hopeful for any office other than dog catcher smells as bad as the runoff from an overflowing, retched septic tank which stinks to high Heaven. I don’t know how Huelskamp kept from falling out of his chair and dying of laughter from any stupid thing Sharpton said. AL Sharpton, a zero in the American political or religious scene.

No they dont. People who pay capital gains taxes are taxed less for a VERY good reason. 9 time out 10 they have already been taxed on the money they invest. They were taxed when they originally made the money through their job(at around 25%). They then invest it, and are taxed again on at 15% if their investment makes any returns. On the same token, since they are investing their money (that they have paid taxes on already), they run the BIG risk of LOSING their investment. This is the reason that capital gains taxes are lower than regular income taxes. Dont try to debate me on this if you dont know what you’re talking about. On another note, Newt Gingrich wants to bring Capital gains taxes down to 0%. I do not agree with that. However, they definitely dont need to pay more than 15%.  

it is clear that a child born of parents who have different citizenships…the child has a duel citizenship….problem is Obama was NOT vetted properly. We will see where this goes….given that his entire life is hidden under lock and key and how about that SS#. why doesn’t it match up and whats the big secret with his college records and his passport….why the cover up…he should be proud to share his road to success if it is legit….when you have nothing to hide , you hide nothing

not one person has mentioned color of his skin except you…a good man tells the truth and does not hide the history of his past life which this President has. A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN HAS TWO (2) PARENTS WHO ARE BOTH AMERICAN CITIZENS AT THE TIME OF THE CHILDS BIRTH….Natrual Born.

This is total hypocrisy until someone show me where John  McCain can be more qualified to run for president at the mere claim of one or two people that he was born on U.S. soil when his parents were overseas VERSUS Obama being verified by an entire Hospital (i.e., it’s doctors, nurses, staff, wing, and a specific claim of the delivery doctor that slapped infant Obama’s rear end to wake the child) and, later, certified by the entire State of Hawaii.

Another case in point is a retired co-worker claimed her grandchild would be an American citizen even though her daughter was born in South Africa and her daughter’s husband was Australian. This came from the same woman that neglected to reveal the fact that THIS SAME extension of U.S. citizenship would be permitted for Obama [had that been the case, but Obama was born in a state (a providential region fully vested under the governance of the United States of America)]. Again…total hypocrisy…. 

You got it rightright,Gloves.  That is her income range.  By the way, since when is someones income subject scorn?  The last time I looked,America is the land of opportunity.  It seems to me that since qwe have had Obama,financila success is looked down upon.  Hell, Obama’s income is around seven million.  What was he worth when he was a Senator?  Wait until his Presidency is over, and shee what his net worth will look like.

You got it rightright,Gloves.  That is her income range.  By the way, since when is someones income subject scorn?  The last time I looked,America is the land of opportunity.  It seems to me that since we have had Obama,financila success is looked down upon.  Hell, Obama’s income is around seven million.  What was he worth when he was a Senator?  Wait until his Presidency is over, and shee what his net worth will look like.

The arrogance of Malihi’s decision is astounding. If he needs legal authority showing that the president cannot be simply commanded to present himself in court on a very specific date, he might start with the Supreme Court of the United States, which strongly implied in Clinton v. Jones that a court cannot “compel the attendance of the President at any specific time or place.” Likewise, if he needs proof that summoning the president of the United States to testify on a frivolous issue would be “cumulative” of existing evidence, he might consider discovering something called “Google

DO YOUR HOMEWORK.  IF YOU WANT CHANGE….START WITHIN…GOD BLESS YOU ALL.

Obama has been a mystery since day one.  where the hell did this guy come from?  Has anyone seen any legislation this man sponsored?

The only reason a free Europe even exists is because of the sacrifices of Americans. If they’re so happy, what are all these riots about over there ? The reason of course, is that their populations have become accoustomed to living off the efforts of others; trouble is, you can take only so much from the productive to give to the slackers (like you)before there is simply no more left. That’s the lesson people like you and Obama should have learned by now.

If we could only get Al to pay his taxes we could get this country rolling again.

Stop it … it makes republicans look bad

WE KNOW RACISM WHEN WE SEE IT

Some of you people have gotten off the point(WE ACTUALLY STILL HAVE BIRTHERS WOW). The next you get paid look at your check stub and understand that Mitt pays less than half the percentage you pay. This is what is being discussed .

It is men like Al Sharpton, John Brown, Jim Jones, and Jesse Jackson that try to make the nonsense they espouse sound correct. It is their opinion that the more times you use untrue information, the more true it becomes until it is truth. Heinrich Himmler and Goebbels used this tactic quite effectively in turning Europe against the Jews. Beware the race mongers, the skin color mongers, and the semi-truth mongers…they are out there is the guise of sheep’s clothing and are as evil as the devil himself.

I enjoy watching the likes of Bill Maher, Ed Schultz, Rachel Maddow, Al Sharpton, and the most reverend Jesse Jackson calling the kettle black (oops I didn’t mean for that to sound racist) Idiots all, save the biggest idiot of all – all the Americans who voted for Barrack Hussein Obama because they wanted hope, change, and the first black president.  Has the United States of American drunk too much water with fluride in it? Where the hell is Theodore Roosevelt’s Big Stick? 

Dear Mitch – You are a cool dude. I like your sense of style and decorum. How is Detroit this days? Is it bustling with jobs the president created? Notice the income equality for all those who have taken so much, from so many, and achieved so little with all they’ve been given. Go pawn yourself. . . you might get on TV!

The BC is not the issue. Shows how much you know about anything.

Such as when people who bring race into an issue when race is not involved in the discussion such as yourself.

Al Sharpton? On TV?
Who’d be dumb enough to put a lying cheap crook, and known imbecile
on live TV. 
Even the democrat networks, aren’t that stupid are they?

the boundless huge crowd I looking for my lover, and some people say is good, but not, some people have luxuriant language, but I want to look at a sample, sincere to any person!….——–> sugarcupid.C○MIt is a person’als place where you can meet success’ful rich men, classy mature women, rich women looking for marriage, or just meet beautiful friends and singles

HE’S A RACIST FOR SURE “Shirley”…..you have him pegged correctly!!!!

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!……..too funny