Lawrence deserves his happiness, he’s eaened it.

Praise God baby! He forgives everything! Woooo Hoooo! Gingrich is a tool.

…..earned it.

Well done! Direct, on target, carefully sculpted to fit the original.
Oh, yeah, and BRUTAL!!

Real professional there crazy larry. No wonder you’re circling the drain. Enjoy it while it lasts.

Yo Lawrence, you and Chrissy’s obsession of Newt is a waste of time. None of us Independents and Republicans have any plans on voting for Newt. He is not Presidential material. He should be a University Prof. in History or Politics. However, if you and Chrissy want to get into Newt’s pants then just ask him but, quit wasting everyone’s time on you PMSnbc’ers perverted sexual fascination of Newt, Huck, Sarah and Michele Bachmann. I doubt that anyone of them want anything to do with weirdo’s like you and Chrissy. Get a life!

Yo Lawrence, you and Chrissy’s obsession of Newt is a waste of time. None of us Independents and Republicans have any plans on voting for Newt.

————-

That’s what’s so funny. I don’t know a single person that would vote for newt.

WildMan said:
Yo Lawrence, you and Chrissy’s obsession of Newt is a waste of time. None of us Independents and Republicans have any plans on voting for Newt.

Religion of Peace said:
Yo Lawrence, you and Chrissy’s obsession of Newt is a waste of time. None of us Independents and Republicans have any plans on voting for Newt.
Odd, two bloggers with but one thought. and one string of words. Guess the marching orders went out.

Just curious: Why is it that every time a lefty does something like this, the folks at Mediaite describe it as “epic” or “awesome” or getting “pwned”? I picture Alex, Tommy, Frances & the others sitting in a room with a big TV, some tortilla chips & some lattes watching MSNBC, rooting along & high-fiving like their hometown team just scored the go ahead touchdown in the Super Bowl. “Woo-hoo, did you hear what Rachel just said about that conservative guy? It was epic.” “yeah, awesome.” “He got pwned”. Butt slaps & pounds all around.

It less about Newt Gingrich and more about the culture of marital sin that permeates the Republican party.

Joseph Glackin said:

Do you realize how weak you are posting the fact that I happen to agree with another poster? Should I continue to make you look even more foolish and desperate?

We can do better than Gingrich. By the way, O’Donnell beats the hell out of Olbermann.

same2u said:
It less about Newt Gingrich and more about the culture of marital sin that permeates the Republican party.

What does Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson and Bill Clinton have in common?

Religion of Peace said:
Do you realize how weak you are posting the fact that I happen to agree with another poster? Should I continue to make you look even more foolish and desperate?

Word for word, starting with the “Yo, Lawrence,”? I don’t think so. Unless you clowns are sharing a sleeping bag and taking turns putting your jammies on backwards, no two guys are that close.

lonestar77 said:
Just curious: Why is it that every time a lefty does something like this, the folks at Mediaite describe it as “epic” or “awesome” or getting “pwned”? I picture Alex, Tommy, Frances & the others sitting in a room with a big TV, some tortilla chips & some lattes watching MSNBC, rooting along & high-fiving like their hometown team just scored the go ahead touchdown in the Super Bowl. “Woo-hoo, did you hear what Rachel just said about that conservative guy? It was epic.” “yeah, awesome.” “He got pwned”. Butt slaps & pounds all around.

LMFAO! So true. They sure like their MessNBC and Comedy Central at Mediaite headquarters.

lonestar77 said:
Just curious: Why is it that every time a lefty does something like this, the folks at Mediaite describe it as “epic” or “awesome” or getting “pwned”? I picture Alex, Tommy, Frances & the others sitting in a room with a big TV, some tortilla chips & some lattes watching MSNBC, rooting along & high-fiving like their hometown team just scored the go ahead touchdown in the Super Bowl. “Woo-hoo, did you hear what Rachel just said about that conservative guy? It was epic.” “yeah, awesome.” “He got pwned”. Butt slaps & pounds all around.

We don’t always get final say on headlines. Also, not all of us are liberal. But we do like tortilla chips.

Religion of Peace said:
Yo Lawrence, you and Chrissy’s obsession of Newt is a waste of time. None of us Independents and Republicans have any plans on voting for Newt.

————-

That’s what’s so funny. I don’t know a single person that would vote for newt.

And yet, people will vote for him. Newt is a God to some Republicans. He led the charge to impeach Bill Clinton, (yes even while committing serial adultery), and even though he failed to throw Clinton from office, by golly, he tried.

Its kind of like Peter King. Even though he supported terrorists, he now makes political hay (and pumps up his campaign war chest) by having a nice terrorist witch hunt and barbeque.

david r said:
We can do better than Gingrich. By the way, O’Donnell beats the hell out of Olbermann.

Sure, but can you convince “better” that he should run against an incumbent president whose base is being galvanized by some of the same kind of GOP political chicanery that got Obama elected in the first place?

(and pumps up his campaign war chest)

Gets funnier every time I read it…he has no competition.

OxyCon said:
LMFAO! So true. They sure like their MessNBC and Comedy Central at Mediaite headquarters.

Just curious: If Mediate is so hatefully liberal and biased, why do tighty righties show up to post here so much? Is it because conservatives haven’t figured out how to make a conservative version of mediate? You would think someone like Pablo who spends so much time posting here would start a media blog for conservatives, but he seems content spend his whole day interacting with people he doesn’t even like. And ndanielson seems to visit here solely to exercise his right to call people “clown’ and “dummy.”

Maybe conservatives need to hire a liberal to teach them how to make a blog.

Religion of Peace said:
(and pumps up his campaign war chest)

Gets funnier every time I read it…he has no competition.

And that is going to stop him from sending out fundraising letters? He’s got a couple of million in the chest, but what politician ever let that stop him from sending out fundraising letters?

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00001193

Since he has no competition, why does he need to spend a million on a campaign?

lonestar77 said:
Why is it that every time a lefty does something like this, the folks at Mediaite describe it as “epic” or “awesome” or getting “pwned”?

And when conservatives do it, it’s called an attack, or a slam, etc.

Oh, please. If Gingrich had tried to thwart the discovery process of a sexual harassment suit by using an attorney friend (Vernon Jordan) to persuade his lover to sign a false affidavit, then O’Donnel might have an accurate comparison. If Gingrich had gotten the then Ambassador of the UN (Bill Richardson) to offer his squeeze a job, then O’Donnell would have gold.

As it stands, all he offers is the liberal trope that the Lewinsky scandal was solely about sex.

What Larry truly has is the fact that Gingrich is a serial groom.

That alone should be more than enough to make CBN hold him suspect, without O’Donnell having to make false equivalencies on behalf of the DNC.

Alex Alvarez said:
We don’t always get final say on headlines. Also, not all of us are liberal. But we do like tortilla chips.

Fair enough about the headlines but someone ought to speak to the headline guy because they so often read like a text message sent between high-schoolers. And, OMG, it’s like always when a lefty punks a righty.

I recognize not ALL of y’all are liberal. Matt isn’t. There’s another new guy who isn’t, also.

Tortilla chips are definitely non-partisan.

Alex Alvarez said:
We don’t always get final say on headlines. Also, not all of us are liberal. But we do like tortilla chips.

Oh…”Spooky Dude” reserves final say on headlines? =P You guys should give the Limon Cheetos a try!

StandUp said:
And when conservatives do it, it’s called an attack, or a slam, etc.

True. Good point.

Sprocket said:
Just curious: If Mediate is so hatefully liberal and biased, why do tighty righties show up to post here so much? Is it because conservatives haven’t figured out how to make a conservative version of mediate? You would think someone like Pablo who spends so much time posting here would start a media blog for conservatives, but he seems content spend his whole day interacting with people he doesn’t even like. And ndanielson seems to visit here solely to exercise his right to call people “clown’ and “dummy.”

Maybe conservatives need to hire a liberal to teach them how to make a blog.

Because, we like to interact with the left and defend ourselves. It’s much more fun (to me) to defend an onslaught of attacks from the left than to simply converse with people who think the same way I do.
“hey, Obama kinda sucks, huh?” “yep, he does”. Okay, good talking to ya.

Alex Alvarez said:
We don’t always get final say on headlines. Also, not all of us are liberal. But we do like tortilla chips.

Are you saying that if the headline doesn’t praise the left position it gets get overruled? What exacly happened with this headline?

Also, while we are on the subject, would you mind removing the “you might also like… Anne Coulter get’s owned” thing? It was a stupid headline when it came out the first time, and being reminded about it reinforces the left leaning intent of Mediaite, and not in a good way. That chip was stale right out of the bag.

Cecelia said:
Oh, please. If Gingrich had tried to thwart the discovery process of a sexual harassment suit by using an attorney friend (Vernon Jordan) to persuade his lover to sign a false affidavit, then O’Donnel might have an accurate comparison. If Gingrich had gotten the then Ambassador of the UN (Bill Richardson) to offer his squeeze a job, then O’Donnell would have gold.

As it stands, all he offers is the liberal trope that the Lewinsky scandal was solely about sex.

What Larry truly has is the fact that Gingrich is a serial groom.

That alone should be more than enough to make CBN hold him suspect, without O’Donnell having to make false equivalencies on behalf of the DNC.

“Serial groom”. Nicely done. Overlook the wee bit of adultery. Newtie is definitely a “grass is greener” kinda guy.

Sprocket said:
Just curious: If Mediate is so hatefully liberal and biased, why do tighty righties show up to post here so much? Is it because conservatives haven’t figured out how to make a conservative version of mediate?

Because it’s fun…duh… winning! And also because our internet browsers have this thing called “tabs” which allows us to view a couple dozen websites at once…give em a try!

Sprocket said:
Just curious: If Mediate is so hatefully liberal and biased, why do tighty righties show up to post here so much? Is it because conservatives haven’t figured out how to make a conservative version of mediate? You would think someone like Pablo who spends so much time posting here would start a media blog for conservatives, but he seems content spend his whole day interacting with people he doesn’t even like. And ndanielson seems to visit here solely to exercise his right to call people “clown’ and “dummy.”

Maybe conservatives need to hire a liberal to teach them how to make a blog.

Maybe you need to hire a conservative to teach you how to offer a cogent and non-contradictory summation.

Sprocket said:
Just curious: If Mediate is so hatefully liberal and biased, why do tighty righties show up to post here so much? Is it because conservatives haven’t figured out how to make a conservative version of mediate? You would think someone like Pablo who spends so much time posting here would start a media blog for conservatives, but he seems content spend his whole day interacting with people he doesn’t even like. And ndanielson seems to visit here solely to exercise his right to call people “clown’ and “dummy.”

Maybe conservatives need to hire a liberal to teach them how to make a blog.

Can you post a link to your blog?

Sprocket said:
“Serial groom”. Nicely done. Overlook the wee bit of adultery. Newtie is definitely a “grass is greener” kinda guy.

Well, perhaps in your case, it would take a woman to point the difference between the guy divorcing his wife and marrying you, as contrasted to his only using you as an ashtray for body fluid.

Whaddaya wanna bet “sprocket” doesn’t have a blog?

lonestar77 said:
Why is it that every time a lefty does something like this, the folks at Mediaite describe it as “epic” or “awesome” or getting “pwned

Also- is it just me or do the pictures of leftys seem to be normal pics if not flattering, but the pics of Rush, Palin, Bachmann, etc, usually depict them as angry, mouth open as if yelling, or with a scrunched up “ugly face”. Nahh, probably just my political blindness, yeah, that’s it.

Religion of Peace said:
Whaddaya wanna bet “sprocket” doesn’t have a blog?

Whaddaya wanna bet that Sprocket needs a conservative to point out the irony of pairing that “argument” with his particular avatar…

sprocket? hello? Link to your blog?

sprocket seems to be a little tongue tied…

Religion of Peace said:
Whaddaya wanna bet “sprocket” doesn’t have a blog?

No need for a blog. I visit here for some quick laughs. You on the other hand seem to have pitched a tent.

Cecelia said:
Whaddaya wanna bet that Sprocket needs a conservative to point out the irony of pairing that “argument” with his particular avatar…

Whaddya wanna bet Cecilia has wheels on her house, and a large vodka to start the day?

StandUp said:
Also- is it just me or do the pictures of leftys seem to be normal pics if not flattering, but the pics of Rush, Palin, Bachmann, etc, usually depict them as angry, mouth open as if yelling, or with a scrunched up “ugly face”. Nahh, probably just my political blindness, yeah, that’s it.

Actually, I think it’s because unflattering shots of O’Donnell, Maddow, Pelosi, or union members, simply don’t exist…

You would think someone like “sprocket” who spends so much time posting here would start a media blog for closers, but he seems content spend his whole day interacting with people he doesn’t even like. And “sprocket” seems to visit here solely to exercise his right to make himself look foolish and childish.

You would think someone like “sprocket” who spends so much time posting here would start a media blog for LOSERS, but he seems content spend his whole day interacting with people he doesn’t even like. And “sprocket” seems to visit here solely to exercise his right to make himself look foolish and childish.

Sprocket said:
Whaddya wanna bet Cecilia has wheels on her house, and a large vodka to start the day?

Far more trite than “clown” or “dummy”.

Wanna bet we aren’t surprised?

Sprocket said:
No need for a blog. I visit here for some quick laughs.

Translation– he visits here to call conservatives the equivalent of “clown or dummy” (self perception isn’t his forte…)

Wanna bet “sprocket” is a very familiar poster who was banned from OW? ;)

Cheers, Cecelia! :)

I don’t want to give the impression that I’m defending Newt and his bare-face hypocrisies over affairs, but this pissed me off. O’Donnell is literally putting words in Newt’s mouth. Is this really want network journalism has come to? This is just the kind of thing you might see on the Daily Show.

And the subtle digs at his wife were a low blow.

All the people that have supported Clinton, Spitzer, Edwards, Kennedy and Dodd should not be critizing Newt. You folks just love adulterers. He is counting on all of your democrat votes.

Religion of Peace said:
Wanna bet “sprocket” is a very familiar poster who was banned from OW? ;)

Sure I’ll role the dice… (Mama needs a new pair of shoes!…)

damien said:
And the subtle digs at his wife were a low blow.

Yeah, it’s not her fault that she’s got a narcissist for a husband.

gordonbloyershow said:
All the people that have supported Clinton, Spitzer, Edwards, Kennedy and Dodd should not be critizing Newt. You folks just love adulterers. He is counting on all of your democrat votes.

The difference, my friend, is that people like Newt who profess family values and attack some of those fellows you listed, while cheating on their wives.

gordonbloyershow said:
All the people that have supported Clinton, Spitzer, Edwards, Kennedy and Dodd…

Could you tell me which one of those went to the hospital where their wife was laying with cancer and served her divorce papers.

the real john t said:
Could you tell me which one of those went to the hospital where their wife was laying with cancer and served her divorce papers.

John Edwards

Wow Lawrence! The supreme level of ownage LOD just hammered Newt with should be only used by professionals like LOD. That must have hurt his ancestors!

Dem4Ever said:
John Edwards

John Edwards didn’t serve his wife divorce papers.

the real john t said:
John Edwards didn’t serve his wife divorce papers.

Yep, her dignity dictated that she serve him.

Dem4Ever said:
Yep, her dignity dictated that she serve him.

Then why did you answer my comment about who served their wife divorce papers when she was in the hospital with cancer with Edwards did?

And to think that NBC wants to host a debate with the republican candidates. I believe the RNC, or whoever it is that decides these debates, should tell NBC to stuff it. There is no way any republican will ever get a fair shake from NBC.

LOD had fun trashing a conservative….what else is new? MSNBC trashes republicans deaily, it is what the do. hate speech from morning til night.

In Newt’s case LOD stands for Legion Of Doom!

Larry O’Donnell isn’t even a good comedian, much less a good TV talker.

He’s a freaking drama queen.

TfT said:
And to think that NBC wants to host a debate with the republican candidates. I believe the RNC, or whoever it is that decides these debates, should tell NBC to stuff it. There is no way any republican will ever get a fair shake from NBC. LOD had fun trashing a conservative….what else is new? MSNBC trashes republicans deaily, it is what the do. hate speech from morning til night.

O’Donnell, Madcow and Sgt. Shultz spend an inordinate amount of time trashing Fox News. That is because they have nothing good to say about MSNBC.

O’Donnell should look at his ratings!!!!
My home videos of me as a child had higher ratings

O’Donnell: “I am a socialist. I live to the far left of you mere liberals.”

I’m supposed to give a f— about this guy’s parody on Newt? If he was on fire i’d piss gasoline on him.

Newts understanding of our history and our founding farthers connections with God and our country are spectacular. Basic mindless liberals will try to distract with Newts wife issues. Typical comedy. But when coming from openly anti American scumbags, what’s it matter what he says?

Alex Alvarez said:
We don’t always get final say on headlines.

Would that be the job of “managing editor” Colby Hall? The guy who hasn’t yet mastered the use of apostrophes?

Sprocket said:
Just curious: If Mediate is so hatefully liberal and biased, why do tighty righties show up to post here so much? Is it because conservatives haven’t figured out how to make a conservative version of mediate? You would think someone like Pablo who spends so much time posting here would start a media blog for conservatives, but he seems content spend his whole day interacting with people he doesn’t even like. And ndanielson seems to visit here solely to exercise his right to call people “clown’ and “dummy.”

Maybe conservatives need to hire a liberal to teach them how to make a blog.

There is a “conservative version” of Mediaite: http://newsbusters.org/

And Mediaite isn’t “hatefully liberal and biased.” But some of their writers are indisputably biased.

“political chicanery got Obama elected in the first place.”

How very true!

Sprocket said:
Just curious: If Mediate is so hatefully liberal and biased, why do tighty righties show up to post here so much? Is it because conservatives haven’t figured out how to make a conservative version of mediate? You would think someone like Pablo who spends so much time posting here would start a media blog for conservatives, but he seems content spend his whole day interacting with people he doesn’t even like. And ndanielson seems to visit here solely to exercise his right to call people “clown’ and “dummy.”

Maybe conservatives need to hire a liberal to teach them how to make a blog.

And how come you liberals can’t produce even ONE successful radio or TV show?

Maybe conservatives need to hire a liberal to teach them how to make a blog.

Unless we wanted to create some kind of failing welfare state where unrealistic utopian pipe dreams are the goal, why in the world would I want to hire a liberal?

That was a brutal take down…..just brutal…….it has you dumbasses scrambling looking for an answer…..unfortunately there is no answer for the truth………EPIC…..simply EPIC……..lololololololololol

WildMan said:
Yo Lawrence, you and Chrissy’s obsession of Newt is a waste of time. None of us Independents and Republicans have any plans on voting for Newt. He is not Presidential material. He should be a University Prof. in History or Politics. However, if you and Chrissy want to get into Newt’s pants then just ask him but, quit wasting everyone’s time on you PMSnbc’ers perverted sexual fascination of Newt, Huck, Sarah and Michele Bachmann. I doubt that anyone of them want anything to do with weirdo’s like you and Chrissy. Get a life!

hahahahahaha……you’re hurting son……..nobody wants to do palin or bachman but you……aint happening though………u better dig that sock puppet of yours out and get busy

Epic?

If the headline writers insisted on using hyperbole, the words “tragic” and “ridiculous” would have been far more appropriate.

Steve_27 said:
O’Donnell: “I am a socialist. I live to the far left of you mere liberals.”

I’m supposed to give a f— about this guy’s parody on Newt? If he was on fire i’d piss gasoline on him.

Newts understanding of our history and our founding farthers connections with God and our country are spectacular. Basic mindless liberals will try to distract with Newts wife issues. Typical comedy. But when coming from openly anti American scumbags, what’s it matter what he says?

Socialism is not anti-American. It’s an opinion about the proper way to run a country. He likes America, and thinks socialism would be better for it. Anti-capitalist does not mean anti-American.

Yukon Jack said:
And how come you liberals can’t produce even ONE successful radio or TV show?

Because liberals don’t need to constantly be told that they are right by their televisions. People watch Fox News for self-validation, something they can’t get intellectually.

Sprocket said:
Just curious: If Mediate is so hatefully liberal and biased, why do tighty righties show up to post here so much?

.
It is a window into a whole new world of simply delightful loving creatures that I would never know. OK, that’s enough about Writer, Sarah, 2012, INB, Cecelia etc.

You surely don’t think that I would willingly put myself in physically close proximity with such as TRRK, Bovine, little johnny t, Scott Heckman, Kvon, Color Me Badd, and all the other borderline psychotics I’ve encountered here, do you?

In short, just as with DU, Kos, Newshounds etc it is a glimpse into a very dark world peopled with some really scary loons with no actual danger to me.

Judge Mental said:
Would that be the job of “managing editor” Colby Hall? The guy who hasn’t yet mastered the use of apostrophes?

.
I vote for Tommy.

His columns read like one loooong Medisite headline.

Kined said:
Socialism is not anti-American. It’s an opinion about the proper way to run a country. He likes America, and thinks socialism would be better for it. Anti-capitalist does not mean anti-American.

“Proper” is your opinion, nothing else. Socialism IS anti American because it is nothing the founding farthers wanted or invisioned or set us up for. They are two totally different types of governing and wars have been fought over less. Thank God for our civility.

In the meantime, socialism (commie light) actually has a history of not working and a tremendous case can be made for what a disgrace it is. Based in the utopian farce of “equality,” stupid liberals cant seem to realize that you have to actually be unfair in order to be fair. Did you get that or should I write slower?

Redistribution of wealth is nonsense for reasons even you could understand if you actually spent some time figuring it out. I’ll give you the weekend, get back to me on Monday.

Kined said:
Because liberals don’t need to constantly be told that they are right by their televisions. People watch Fox News for self-validation, something they can’t get intellectually.

Could be the dumbest thing ever posted.

Sorry, I never did consider it was meant as a joke.