I might actually listen to what this douchebag had to say if he wasn’t so full of hate on every issue he has ever addressed, including the death of Michael Jackson.

Fuck Peter King.

BFD accuses someone of being full of hate. LOL

Big_F-ing_Deal said:
this douchebag had to say if he wasn’t so full of hate on every issue

A fitting self description of BFD!

“feelings”, “insensitivity”, “psyche”, “moral”, “emotions”, “wound”.

When the fuck did our feelings start trumping our sacred beliefs?

Sure, BFD may have posted some hateful things, but they’re few and far between. LOL

Tealiban spokesman Peter King makes an appearance to serve stupidi-tea.

And Bill serves the crumpets to go with it.

“Fuck Peter King.” BFD

BFD has a big advantage over Mr. King. No one cares what BFD thinks about anything. Whereas Mr. King has to answer to his constituents, the majority of whom oppose the GZ Mo.

Obama was wrong on this. The owners of the Islamic center say they want to open a door for dialogue. Does anyone think that will happen here? It’s hard to have a dialogue when the voices are drowned out by disrespect. Build the Mosque. Just somewhere else.

Here is a press release from the 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America Release Statement After Pres. Obama’s Defense of Ground Zero Mosque: http://blogs.chron.com/texassparkle/2010/08/911_families_for_a_safe_strong.html

writer said:
And Bill serves the crumpets to go with it.

One lump or two, writer?

BFD thinks?

Bill, crumpets don’t come in lumps.

Kathleen McKinley said:

Here is a press release from the 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America Release Statement After Pres. Obama’s Defense of Ground Zero Mosque: http://blogs.chron.com/texassparkle/2010/08/911_families_for_a_safe_strong.html

Aha….so it isn’t just about insensitivity after all, it’s about “safety” too.

“Building a 15-story mosque at Ground Zero is a deliberately provocative act that will precipitate more bloodshed in the name of Allah. Those who continue to target and kill American civilians and U.S. troops will see it as a symbol of their historic progress at the site of their most bloody victory.”

We gonna get blowed up real gud if’n we allow this here Mosque-a-doohicky.

“And now we come to the center of the shrubbery maze” –Family Guy

writer said:
Bill, crumpets don’t come in lumps.

And we have a winner!!! Thanks for playing!! Tell him what he’s won, Jay!

Bill, is Jay the attendant at the ‘home’ you’re staying in?

“Not a mosque but a multicultural center”. Multiculturalism as long as there is just one culture dominating the Ground, Islam. The best way to destroy the host culture. We have had the same “offer” here in Amsterdam. The sponsors turned out to be Milli Görüş, forbidden in several countries due to connections to terrorist organizations.

I think I saw BFD at lunch today. He asked me if I wanted fries
with my order>

Thanks for the foreign perspective, Ron. In case you’re unfamiliar with the American left, they endlessly mock Christianity, but when it comes to Muslims, they believe in being ‘understanding’.

JimBob said:
I think I saw BFD at lunch today. He asked me if I wanted fries
with my order>

Wow, a french fry joke on the internet.

How clever!!!!

WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THIS MOSQUE OR WE ARE GONNA GET ATTACKED AGAIN!!!LOLOL!!11!!

Typical Right-wing fear mongering asshats.

And Democrats – at least the ones willing to comment at all — could barely contain their frustration over Obama’s remarks Friday night, saying they would further complicate campaign efforts by candidates struggling in an anti-Democratic year, particularly moderates in conservative-leaning districts who already are 2010’s most vulnerable contenders.

“I would prefer the president be a little more of a politician and a little less of a college professor,” former Rep. Martin Frost (D-Tex.), who once ran the House Democratic campaign arm, wrote in POLITICO’s Arena. “While a defensible position, it will not play well in the parts of the country where Democrats need the most help.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41069.html#ixzz0wbucnQEY

See what I mean, Ron?

Overnight polling on this issue must have been horrendous. Teh One is back tracking already. LOL

What a clymer…..another vote of “present”….says one thing, hears about it, says something else claiming he never said what he originally said and the left wing media eat it right up and protect him.

The harder you push against someone’s belief or position, the harder the defense is put up.

Just dismissing and disrespecting the people against it, they get louder and more resilient. Everyone knows US law will prevail, it’s just a way to express themselves. There’s a large enough contingent of Muslims who will do anything in the world. Look at Europe’s failure in containment. Partly due to population imbalance and partly due to systemic failures. We have 300mil people and many levels of redundancies of law enforcement and judicial system. I don’t see us getting overrun. However there was one Judge who said per Sharia Law a husband can force sex on his wife, even though it’s rape currently. So anything is possible. He was overturned upon appeal.

Yeah I went off on a tangent there. All are not good, All are not bad….more than enough are bad that we use our Armed Forces against them. Suspicion is wise. The left wingers just see another group they can get to vote for them as well as opposite their traditional foes of Christianity. Islam sees Jesus, not as the messiah, but as a prophet. So maybe not so different.

You can’t assume King Obama has morals , or at least the sensibilities that most people grew up with . His strange upbringing really should be explored on a psychiatrist ‘s couch , not on the world stage . His past and current associations matter . His defenders really have to twist and turn to find a way to explain him . A real workout for them . And Gibbsy could use it .

Apostrophe jones said:
You can’t assume King Obama has morals

“morals” – that’s like “principles,” isn’t it? Strange to hear Peter King talking about either concept. He’s just another gutless POS Republican who’d find a way to criticize Obama even if it were an expressed opinion about paper or plastic.

Big_F-ing_Deal said:
“feelings”, “insensitivity”, “psyche”, “moral”, “emotions”, “wound”.

When the fuck did our feelings start trumping our sacred beliefs?

This is the same Peter King who supports the Irish Republican Army. I wonder when he’s going to try to stop a Catholic church from being built. Oh that’s right: Blowing up innocent people is OK if you’re white.

And being anti-semitic is okay if you’re black.

writer said:
And being anti-semitic is okay if you’re black.

It is? I call bullshit. Anti-semitism is never ‘okay.’ There are stupid people of all races, stupid doesn’t discriminate.

So when Obama listened to Wright for twenty years and never heard anything untoward, you believed it.

Whether he did or not he had the courage to respond in this manner: “I am outraged by the comments that were made and saddened by the spectacle that we saw yesterday… The person that I saw yesterday was not the person that I met 20 years ago. His comments were not only divisive and destructive, but I believe that they end up giving comfort to those who prey on hate, and I believe that they do not portray accurately the perspective of the black church. They certainly don’t portray accurately my values and beliefs. And if Reverend Wright thinks that that’s political posturing, as he put it, then he doesn’t know me very well. And based on his remarks yesterday, well, I may not know him as well as I thought either…. What became clear to me is that he was presenting a world view that contradicts who I am and what I stand for, and what I think particularly angered me was his suggestion somehow that my previous denunciation of his remarks were somehow political posturing. Anybody who knows me and anybody who knows what I’m about knows that I am about trying to bridge gaps and I see the commonality in all people. …[A]fter seeing Reverend Wright’s performance, I felt as if there was a complete disregard for what the American people are going through and the need for them to rally together to solve these problems. …[W]hatever relationship I had with Reverend Wright has changed, as a consequence of this.”

But I sense a fear in people like you, and now I recognize it as something I saw in the wonder years of the ’60s. Is that it? George Wallace supporters and their fear of change. Martin Luther King called a communist and worse. It’s becoming more clear now, writer.

Bill, is insulting anyone who disagrees with your politics and calling them a ‘tea bagger’ what you’re referring to by ‘bridging gaps’?

Big_F-ing_Deal said:
WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THIS MOSQUE OR WE ARE GONNA GET ATTACKED AGAIN!!!LOLOL!!11!!

Typical Right-wing fear mongering asshats.

So are you calling the majority of the 9/11 victims “Right-wing fear mongering asshats”? You sure are a POS. The majority of the 9/11 victim families don’t want the mosque built next close to Ground Zero and Liberals are calling them names…you are despicable low lifes.

Even close to 70% of the American public don’t want it built there. So are you saying that 70% of Americans are right-wingers? You are a just old plain POS idiot.

Big_F-ing_Deal said:
WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THIS MOSQUE OR WE ARE GONNA GET ATTACKED AGAIN!!!LOLOL!!11!!

Typical Right-wing fear mongering asshats.

So are you calling the majority of the 9/11 victims FAMILIES “Right-wing fear mongering asshats”? You sure are a POS. The majority of the 9/11 victim families don’t want the mosque built next close to Ground Zero and Liberals are calling them names…you are despicable low lifes.

Even close to 70% of the American public don’t want it built there. So are you saying that 70% of Americans are right-wingers? You are a just old plain POS idiot. But then again you have always been a low life piece of sh*t

Peter King, just another right wing douche bag. They’re all a like. I remember months ago when he went on CNN and literally said (when asked what he wants Obama to do), he said Obama needs “to say the word ‘terror’ more often”.. Yes, he really said that.

Latin2 said:
So are you calling the majority of the 9/11 victims FAMILIES “Right-wing fear mongering asshats”? You sure are a POS. The majority of the 9/11 victim families don’t want the mosque built next close to Ground Zero and Liberals are calling them names…you are despicable low lifes. Even close to 70% of the American public don’t want it built there. So are you saying that 70% of Americans are right-wingers? You are a just old plain POS idiot. But then again you have always been a low life piece of sh*t

Show us the proof they don’t want it there.. and saying Fox said so, doesn’t make it fact.. but either way, show us the proof “most of them don’t want it there”.

BTW, all religions are alike – f’ked up. The Muslim nuts have as much right to a building / of worship/ community center as do the nutjob christians do.

What about that don’t you simple-minded-wonders get?

The ignorance is stunning.

ConLoonPatrol said:
Show us the proof they don’t want it there.. and saying Fox said so, doesn’t make it fact.. but either way, show us the proof “most of them don’t want it there”.

BTW, all religions are alike – f’ked up. The Muslim nuts have as much right to a building / of worship/ community center as do the nutjob christians do.

What about that don’t you simple-minded-wonders get?

The ignorance is stunning.

lol…it has been all over the news…yes not also on local channels not Fox News. You are really that stupid that you have not been following the news.

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/article.php?p=65376

Here from the Anti-Defamation Leauge;

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/CvlRt_32/5820_32.htm

writer said:
So when Obama listened to Wright for twenty years and never heard anything untoward, you believed it.

Hey asshole, feel free to show any anti-Semitic statements Wright made in church while Obama was there.

writer said:
Bill, is insulting anyone who disagrees with your politics and calling them a ‘tea bagger’ what you’re referring to by ‘bridging gaps’?

Writer, is changing the subject and dodging the question what you do when the question hits home?

Conservative republicans are sure scared of a lot of things. BOO!!!!!

Bill, you brought up ‘bridging gaps’. All I did was ask a question about your own statement. Which you didn’t answer.

Big_F-ing_Deal said:
“feelings”, “insensitivity”, “psyche”, “moral”, “emotions”, “wound”. When the fuck did our feelings start trumping our sacred beliefs?

————————————————————————
Headline: NY Judge Rules Firefighter’s Test “Unconstitutional” Beacause OUTCOMES Didn’t Meet Racial “Standards”!
- He acknowledged there was NOTHING Bias in the questions, just the OUTCOME!

…is that what you mean about SACRED STANDARDS?, BFD??????

2007: Rep. Peter King: There are “too many mosques in this country”

No. Obama didn’t have a “moral” obligation to oppose the mosque. He does have an obligation to up-hold the Constitution.

That said, he should have just stayed out of it.

It’s odd that of all the places to build the mosque, a site 2 blocks from ground zero was chosen, a site, mind you, where there are very few muslims working or residing. The closest potential attendees would have to travel some miles to get to it.

And where did the money for this prime piece of realestate come from? No one seems to know! What we do know is that taxpayer dollars funded Rauf’s trip abroad so he could brag about this accomplishment.

Someone remarked in response to an earlier piece about the GZM that choosing this location would be akin to building a German beer garden near the front gates of Auschwitz. I think that’s a fair analogy. There are certain things that simply are not de regueur, and a mosque this close to a site where 3,000 US citizens were murdered by al qaeda terrorists is one of them. So, build your mosque if you’re so inclined but build it somewhere else.

So, Mr. -0bama has failed on BOTH counts.

AngelPeters said:
No. Obama didn’t have a “moral” obligation to oppose the mosque. He does have an obligation to up-hold the Constitution. That said, he should have just stayed out of it.

President Obama is sworn to uphold the constitution of the United States. He said what a national leader needed to say. The people of faith in this country have the right to practice their religion uninhibited by government or individual prejudices. 9/11 is past tense. For 10 years they couldn’t come up with a building or monument to the 9/11 victims because the families/survivors/couldn’t agree on its suitability. The muslim community has a right to build its mosque/community center on private property wherever permitted by law. The community tried to have the mosque stopped by declaring it historical property, when that didn’t work they are trying other stall tactics. The president expressed their right. It is up to the muslim community to determine whether it is appropriate. The community has to decide if they are caving on their rights to freedom of religion and it is worth the additional dollars to move the site and redraw the plans. Or the community has to decide that they too are americans, have a superior right to freedom of religious practice and will pray daily to Allah for the victims of 9/11 . Those are the choices. The enemy takes pleasure in whatever it wishes to make evil. Whether its Jihad by the extremists in the middle east or republicans whose goal for the last 18 months is to make Obama fail to govern. Evil will find a way to demonize and destroy.

“Permitted by law” is the real issue. When Bloomberg got enough shakedown money from Rauf, et al, the “law” permitted the mosque project. FOLLOW THE MONEY PEOPLE–follow the money.