hahahahahahahaha maybe they’ll give that a shot in 2012 hahahahahahahahahahaha

Daniels and Herman Cain in 2012.

I can’t stand the woman, but y’all need to learn to take a joke.

Palin fatigue is real.

Delusions of grandeur?
Overwhelming ego?
OR, is the broad just f#ck%ng nuts?

Boy, talk about an out of context headline. Again, here’s the link to the Q&A:

http://www.therightscoop.com/watch-sarah-palin-qa-at-india-today-conclave/#

Watch it with an open mind like you didn’t know her name was Sarah Palin. She’ll pound Obama in a debate.

Publius219 said:
hahahahahahahaha maybe they’ll give that a shot in 2012 hahahahahahahahahahaha

hahahahahahahaha maybe they’ll give that a shot in 2012 hahahahahahahahahahaha
and I thought Charlie Sheen was delusional

hahahahahahahahamaybe hahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha

breath
hahahahahahahahamaybe hahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha

I watched the speech live and it was both good and you could tell that it was well-received. :)

Mediaite = Polutico

Harry Flashman said:
Watch it with an open mind like you didn’t know her name was Sarah Palin. She’ll pound Obama in a debate.

You betcha

ROFLMAO

hahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahamaybe hahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha

breath
hahahahahahahahamaybe hahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha

And it might have been better for the Country if OBAMA wasn’t on the ticket in 2008!

Mark Joyella….

Just curious, but why wouldn’t you link to her actual words instead of to another article? She actually comes off with a great deal of credibility in the interview but then, that just wouldn’t do, would it?

Hey, Rush Gingrich….

Watch, then get back to me.

I like the way the lefties like Publius and “Rush Gingrich” can’t come up with anything other than typing hahaha over and over again.

Way to think things through, guys.

Harry Flashman said:
I like the way the lefties like Publius and “Rush Gingrich” can’t come up with anything other than typing hahaha over and over again.

Way to think things through, guys.

Obama is now a neocon. Maybe they’re just figuring out their talking points? :)

All three people who make up her approval rating agree.

Palin Comparison the Twitter Quitter can run for office in India, since that seems to be the only place there’s anybody still willing to listen to her inane prattling.

I’ll betcha not one of the lefties who post a slam of her here actually listened to the speech or the interview. It’s easier to mock than think. It’s the leftist way.

Betcha.

lol, McCain didn’t get elected because she was on the ticket at all.

JJHunsecker said:
Palin Comparison the Twitter Quitter can run for office in India, since that seems to be the only place there’s anybody still willing to listen to her inane prattling.

Seeing as you responded, you listened.

Raygun said:
lol, McCain didn’t get elected because she was on the ticket at all.

You don’t understand politics.

Stick to buffoonery.

How about the neocon Obama?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!

Harry Flashman said:
I like the way the lefties like Publius and “Rush Gingrich” can’t come up with anything other than typing hahaha over and over again.

Way to think things through, guys.

There’s plenty I COULD come up with, just no NEED to come up with anything else. Imagine…President Sarah Palin….hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

President The Situation. President Kate Gosselin. same difference.

Publius219 said:
President The Situation. President Kate Gosselin. same difference.

or President Donald Trump
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!

WC, you’re way too smart to waste your time with the loser using multiple names.

Harry Flashman said:
I like the way the lefties like Publius and “Rush Gingrich” can’t come up with anything other than typing hahaha over and over again.

Way to think things through, guys.

That’s what trolls do.

Lover said:
That’s what trolls do.

No, that’s because it’s funny. Just like when you far-right trolls flood the boards with hateful comments that lack any kind of substance. Deal with it.

Such a hypocrite.

She “slammed journalists for failing to report on candidates’ records and accomplishments,”…..but when the media actually starts to dig into her record, she complains louder than anyone.

Does she forget that she resigned because she got tired of all the scrutiny and lawsuits she was getting?

mibwilso said:
Such a hypocrite.

She “slammed journalists for failing to report on candidates’ records and accomplishments,”…..but when the media actually starts to dig into her record, she complains louder than anyone.

Does she forget that she resigned because she got tired of all the scrutiny and lawsuits she was getting?

Or lied about selling Alaskas Jet, or refusing funding for the bridge to nowhere.

She needs to get a friggin’ clue. The media does not exist to give you free advertising, Sarah. Nor is their job to report only on the things you want them to report on.

Part of the media’s job is to ask questions of people who are seeking elected office.

Maybe you should leave politics to the ones who can handle the questions.

Half-term, half-wit Sarah Palin’s career would be over in half an hour in a jumble of word salad gibberish were she ever to appear on “Meet the Press”, “Face the Nation” or “This Week.”

Palin also doesn’t have enough palms and Sharpies to appear in that press conference she’s never had since her 2008 nomination.

She won’t have a news conference because she’s afraid someone might ask her to point out Alaska on the map.

“Fox News: Sarah Palin is an idiot ”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5BXMv64EfU

I’m sure the half-term nit wit actually believes this which makes her dumber than a door knob.

Mediaite should quit the velvet glove treatment and just come out and call Palin a “dumb twat” like Bill Maher did:

Low-brow: Bill Maher says Sarah Palin is a ‘dumb twat’

http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/19/low-brow-bill-maher-says-sarah-palin-is-a-dumb-twat/#ixzz1H5GAaAeB

Federal Dollars Spent By State Per Dollar of Federal Taxes

TOP TEN
1) New Mexico $2.03
2) Mississippi $2.02
3) Alaska $1.83
4) Louisiana $1.78
5) West Virginia $1.76
6) North Dakota $1.68
7) Alabama $1.66
8) South Dakota $1.53
9) Kentucky $1.51
10) Virginia $1.51

BOTTOM TEN:
40) Massachussetts $0.82
41) Colorado $0.81
42) New York $0.79
43) California $0.78
44) Delaware $0.77
45) Illinois $0.75
46) Minnesota $0.72
47) New Hampshire $0.71
48) Connecticut $0.69
49) Nevada $0.65
50) New Jersey $0.61

(Source: The Tax Foundation, US Census Bureau) http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html

Hmmm….anyone notice a trend about which states actually live more off the government??

To quote Olbermann;
“That woman, is an idiot.”

mibwilso said:
Such a hypocrite.

She “slammed journalists for failing to report on candidates’ records and accomplishments,”…..but when the media actually starts to dig into her record, she complains louder than anyone.

Does she forget that she resigned because she got tired of all the scrutiny and lawsuits she was getting?

Can you pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawsuits?

And perhaps you should listen to her speech. It’s clear what she meant. You twisting it to fit your own meme isn’t going to change the fact that it was a good speech. :)

P.S. Where’s Neocon Obama?

Air Force One touched down in Brasilia in an early-morning mix of sunshine and raindrops. The president is traveling with his wife, Michelle Obama, daughters Sasha and Malia, and Mrs. Obama’s mother, Marian Robinson. The Obamas were flying to Rio de Janeiro and ending their Saturday there. – AP

mibwilso said:
Federal Dollars Spent By State Per Dollar of Federal Taxes

TOP TEN
1) New Mexico $2.03
2) Mississippi $2.02
3) Alaska $1.83
4) Louisiana $1.78
5) West Virginia $1.76
6) North Dakota $1.68
7) Alabama $1.66
8) South Dakota $1.53
9) Kentucky $1.51
10) Virginia $1.51

BOTTOM TEN:
40) Massachussetts $0.82
41) Colorado $0.81
42) New York $0.79
43) California $0.78
44) Delaware $0.77
45) Illinois $0.75
46) Minnesota $0.72
47) New Hampshire $0.71
48) Connecticut $0.69
49) Nevada $0.65
50) New Jersey $0.61

(Source: The Tax Foundation, US Census Bureau) http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html

Hmmm….anyone notice a trend about which states actually live more off the government??

Now if you would like to produce the list of taxes by state, that would be helpful. :)

Oh Sarah, thanks so much for the laugh! I can always count on you for a giggle!

WCinWI said:
Can you pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawsuits?

And perhaps you should listen to her speech. It’s clear what she meant. You twisting it to fit your own meme isn’t going to change the fact that it was a good speech. :)

P.S. Where’s Neocon Obama?

Air Force One touched down in Brasilia in an early-morning mix of sunshine and raindrops. The president is traveling with his wife, Michelle Obama, daughters Sasha and Malia, and Mrs. Obama’s mother, Marian Robinson. The Obamas were flying to Rio de Janeiro and ending their Saturday there. – AP

WOW
No calling someone a racist
and no link to conservatives for palin

WCinWI said:
Now if you would like to produce the list of taxes by state, that would be helpful. :)

mibwilso said:
Federal Dollars Spent By State Per Dollar of Federal Taxes

TOP TEN
1) New Mexico $2.03
2) Mississippi $2.02
3) Alaska $1.83
4) Louisiana $1.78
5) West Virginia $1.76
6) North Dakota $1.68
7) Alabama $1.66
8) South Dakota $1.53
9) Kentucky $1.51
10) Virginia $1.51

HELLO
spend more than they pay

WCinWI said:
Now if you would like to produce the list of taxes by state, that would be helpful. :)

I provided a link to the list I cited.

In addition, the list describes how much govt. $$ each state receives in relation to how much it pays back in taxes.

I think that speaks for itself.

Right, she would have won if she’d been at the top of the ticket because Liberals and Independents loved her so much they voted for Obama. Nice try dumb ass! Maybe she should start with something easier like contraception for her ever expanding brood?

WCinWI said:
Now if you would like to produce the list of taxes by state, that would be helpful. :)

The point is clear…these state receive more than they give….while other states foot the bill.

mibwilso said:
Federal Dollars Spent By State Per Dollar of Federal Taxes

TOP TEN
1) New Mexico $2.03
2) Mississippi $2.02
3) Alaska $1.83
4) Louisiana $1.78
5) West Virginia $1.76
6) North Dakota $1.68
7) Alabama $1.66
8) South Dakota $1.53
9) Kentucky $1.51
10) Virginia $1.51

BOTTOM TEN:
40) Massachussetts $0.82
41) Colorado $0.81
42) New York $0.79
43) California $0.78
44) Delaware $0.77
45) Illinois $0.75
46) Minnesota $0.72
47) New Hampshire $0.71
48) Connecticut $0.69
49) Nevada $0.65
50) New Jersey $0.61

(Source: The Tax Foundation, US Census Bureau) http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html

Hmmm….anyone notice a trend about which states actually live more off the government??

Sort of brings a whole new meaning to that Republican catch-phrase “Welfare State”, doesn’t it?

Joseph Glackin said:
Sort of brings a whole new meaning to that Republican catch-phrase “Welfare State”, doesn’t it?

“Government’s not the solution! Government’s the problem!” — the person sitting next to me leans over and explains.
“The scooters are because of Medicare,” he whispers helpfully. “They have these commercials down here: ‘You won’t even have to pay for your scooter! Medicare will pay!’ Practically everyone in Kentucky has one.”

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/matt-taibbi-on-the-tea-party-20100928

mibwilso said:
I provided a link to the list I cited.

In addition, the list describes how much govt. $$ each state receives in relation to how much it pays back in taxes.

I think that speaks for itself.

I don’t. I lived in CA. There are tons of unemployed people that take Federal money, as do the people that live in CA illegally. That’s just one state. I don’t have a problem with states taking Federal monies over certain issues. I have a problem when states over-burden themselves with taxing their citizens. Much big difference between states individually taxing their people and Federal monies being given for indigenous, DoT or emergency-related physical disasters.

mibwilso said:
The point is clear…these state receive more than they give….while other states foot the bill.

Yes, and some of these states (Alaska), it’s per their Constitution that certain Federal monies (oil taxes) are issued. Bigger issues to deal with other than Palin’s awesomeness. Neocon Obama and SoS Clinton looking more Presidential are much more important topics.

WCinWI said:
I don’t. I lived in CA. There are tons of unemployed people that take Federal money, as do the people that live in CA illegally.

Perhaps there are tons of unemployed people in CA because there are just TONS of people in CA period.

And yet, even with all of that to deal with, California STILL gets fewer Federal Dollars per dollar than North Dakota.

mibwilso said:
The point is clear…these state receive more than they give….while other states foot the bill.

You want to equate one thing to another. Each state operates differently. If you don’t like it, move.

mibwilso said:
Perhaps there are tons of unemployed people in CA because there are just TONS of people in CA period.

And yet, even with all of that to deal with, California STILL gets fewer Federal Dollars per dollar than North Dakota.

That’s because they have high state taxes and fees for service. I mean seriously. Let’s deal with legit facts. CA is losing jobs because of liberal policies. Green energy for starters.

WCinWI said:
Each state operates differently..

Yes exactly….some get more federal dollars than others….and expect other states to pay for it…..all while their politicians claim that they are the beacons of fiscal responsibility.

WCinWI said:
Neocon Obama and SoS Clinton looking more Presidential are much more important topics.

Suddenly there are much more important topics than federal spending…. LOL.

mibwilso’s list seems to not be understood by the toilet in Wisconsin.
I’ll simplify.
The redder the state, the redder the ink.
The “Welfare Queens” are in the GOP.

WCinWI said:
Mediaite = Polutico

bears repeating….great speech by Palin; Palin represents CHANGE back to American traditional values, Obama represents Crony Chicago Politics.

Palin will wipe the floor with Obama’s big ears

WCinWI said:
I don’t. I lived in CA. There are tons of unemployed people that take Federal money, as do the people that live in CA illegally. That’s just one state. I don’t have a problem with states taking Federal monies over certain issues. I have a problem when states over-burden themselves with taxing their citizens. Much big difference between states individually taxing their people and Federal monies being given for indigenous, DoT or emergency-related physical disasters.

What does that even mean?

WCinWI said:
Yes, and some of these states (Alaska), it’s per their Constitution that certain Federal monies (oil taxes) are issued. Bigger issues to deal with other than Palin’s awesomeness. Neocon Obama and SoS Clinton looking more Presidential are much more important topics.

Alaska oil taxes are state taxes which are dispersed to the residents of alaska.
The state THEN takes more money from Federal than it pays, even though each individual receives several thousand dollars per year.

flagringo said:
bears repeating

Publius219 said:
hahahahahahahaha maybe they’ll give that a shot in 2012 hahahahahahahahahahaha

Rush Gingrich said:
You betcha

ROFLMAO

hahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahamaybe hahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha

breath
hahahahahahahahamaybe hahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha

BFD said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!

nutsofast said:
or President Donald Trump
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!

WCinWI said:
You want to equate one thing to another. Each state operates differently. If you don’t like it, move.

WTF? Each state operates differently? Really?
If that makes sense to you, you need a check-up from the neck up.
FACT: States who take more than they give depend upon other states to bail them out. The proper term is leeches.
Have you ever been in an “ozone alert”? When the air was so thick with smog that you could TASTE it? When doctors told children and the elderly to STAY INSIDE?

Joseph Glackin said:
WTF? .FACT: States who take more than they give depend upon other states to bail them out. The proper term is leeches.?

people too?

mibwilso said:
Yes exactly….some get more federal dollars than others….and expect other states to pay for it…..all while their politicians claim that they are the beacons of fiscal responsibility.

Perhaps you don’t understand how being a state within a group of states works. If a natural disaster strikes, the Fed gov’t should give assistance to this country. All the Fed. gov’t needs to do is have an equipped and ready military and produce the conditions for economic growth, nationally and internationally. Other than that, there’s not a lot more that the Fed. gov’t needs to do. Borders, military, natural disasters……those are the biggies.

WCinWI said:
Perhaps you don’t understand how being a state within a group of states works. If a natural disaster strikes, the Fed gov’t should give assistance to this country. All the Fed. gov’t needs to do is have an equipped and ready military and produce the conditions for economic growth, nationally and internationally. Other than that, there’s not a lot more that the Fed. gov’t needs to do. Borders, military, natural disasters……those are the biggies.

Natural disasters aren’t unique to California, friend. Lots of tornados hit the midwest…hurricanes hit the Southeast….and on and on. It’s pretty dispersed.

mibwilso said:
Natural disasters aren’t unique to California, friend. Lots of tornados hit the midwest…hurricanes hit the Southeast….and on and on. It’s pretty dispersed.

WTHell does Natural disasters have to do with

mibwilso said:
Federal Dollars Spent By State Per Dollar of Federal Taxes

TOP TEN
1) New Mexico $2.03
2) Mississippi $2.02
3) Alaska $1.83
4) Louisiana $1.78
5) West Virginia $1.76
6) North Dakota $1.68
7) Alabama $1.66
8) South Dakota $1.53
9) Kentucky $1.51
10) Virginia $1.51

BOTTOM TEN:
40) Massachussetts $0.82
41) Colorado $0.81
42) New York $0.79
43) California $0.78
44) Delaware $0.77
45) Illinois $0.75
46) Minnesota $0.72
47) New Hampshire $0.71
48) Connecticut $0.69
49) Nevada $0.65
50) New Jersey $0.61

(Source: The Tax Foundation, US Census Bureau) http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html

Hmmm….anyone notice a trend about which states actually live more off the government??

Nice deflection though.

WCinWI said:
Perhaps you don’t understand how being a state within a group of states works. If a natural disaster strikes, the Fed gov’t should give assistance to this country. All the Fed. gov’t needs to do is have an equipped and ready military and produce the conditions for economic growth, nationally and internationally. Other than that, there’s not a lot more that the Fed. gov’t needs to do. Borders, military, natural disasters……those are the biggies.

This has nothing to do with states taking those federal dollars.

WCinWI said:
Perhaps you don’t understand how being a state within a group of states works. If a natural disaster strikes, the Fed gov’t should give assistance to this country. All the Fed. gov’t needs to do is have an equipped and ready military and produce the conditions for economic growth, nationally and internationally. Other than that, there’s not a lot more that the Fed. gov’t needs to do. Borders, military, natural disasters……those are the biggies.

Perhaps you don’t understand that anyone who knows anything, including conservatives, know that more conservative states are welfare states. I think Jindal or Barbour commented on this a few months ago.

Publius219 said:
Perhaps you don’t understand that anyone who knows anything, including conservatives, know that more conservative states are welfare states. I think Jindal or Barbour commented on this a few months ago.

so the rich states pay for the poor states= the rich people pay for the poor people, you got what you want, whats the problem

Please go away Sarah all of the smart people are really sick of you now.

41 posts so far from the left. 25 from the right. Which side is more interested in Palin?

writer said:
41 posts so far from the left. 25 from the right. Which side is more interested in Palin?

The side where a commenter would count the # of comments by assumed political leaning.

Hey there, I find an amazing

Hey there, I find an amazing web,please click the web ,you can find big pleasantly surprised
╭⌒╮WELCOME http://www.fullmalls.com/

WCinWI said:
Perhaps you don’t understand how being a state within a group of states works. If a natural disaster strikes, the Fed gov’t should give assistance to this country. All the Fed. gov’t needs to do is have an equipped and ready military and produce the conditions for economic growth, nationally and internationally. Other than that, there’s not a lot more that the Fed. gov’t needs to do. Borders, military, natural disasters……those are the biggies.

So, what NATURAL DISASTERS hit the Dakotas, the deep South and Alaska at the same time?
Why should my state send money to yours? The reps. from the leech states claim to be for SMALL govt.
Why don’t they refuse to take all that dirty Fed. money?
When Rand Paul refuses to allow Kentucky to receive more than it gives, I’ll believe him. Hell, I’ll buy him a drink.

The problem you have Sarah Palin is not that you put your foot down; It’s that you constantly put your foot in your mouth.

mibwilso said:
Natural disasters aren’t unique to California, friend. Lots of tornados hit the midwest…hurricanes hit the Southeast….and on and on. It’s pretty dispersed.

Since when did I say that natural disasters were only attributed to CA? And by natural disasters, I should’ve also included normal weather catastrophes in general.

WillP said:
The problem you have Sarah Palin is not that you put your foot down; It’s that you constantly put your foot in your mouth.

WillP, why do you always comment on Palin? You are seriously obsessed with Palin. It’s disturbing.

WCinWI said:
WillP, why do you always comment on Palin? You are seriously obsessed with Palin. It’s disturbing.

I comment on lots of topics. No obsession. Politics is fun to follow. And with Sarah Palin it’s not just fun, but funny to observe her performance. By the way, are you still hoping for a Palin/West GOP ticket to go against Obama/Biden? Good luck. I’m looking really hard, but I can’t see Palin/West from my house. I’m going to try to remember something that I’ve read now. Later.

flagringo said:
bears repeating….great speech by Palin; Palin represents CHANGE back to American traditional values, Obama represents Crony Chicago Politics.

Palin will wipe the floor with Obama’s big ears

Obama’s probably one of the nicest guys in the world. He’s never hurt anyone or done anything wrong.. if he had, he wouldn’t have been president. This “thug” talk… please, what does that even mean? His “thug” tactics probably amount to clever decisions on his part that ended with a Republican somewhere unhappy. He seems to raise great kids, is a great husband, speaks with candor, doesn’t make decisions without thinking about them and seems genuinely care about compromising with both sides.

You’re just blinded by bullshit at this point, Obama is awesome and most of America agrees and would be stoked to meet the guy, he’s done some amazing things, even if you dont’ agree with Democrats. Yeah we spend, BFD, get over it, we need to spend or we’ll fall apart like Japan did when a natural disaster hit, plus we need to SPEND to help get our shit together after this reccession, as any business owner knows when they go and grab a loan, you gotta spend money to make money. So yes, Obama has to invest your tax money in things he thinks will boost the economy in the short or long-term.

We’re better off with him than Palin, she’s the dumbest choice and even most Republicans think that now, I’ve seen poll after poll saying people don’t think she’s ready. Glenn Beck it’s “under” her, haha, yeah Sarah Palin, who’s daughter was on “Dancing with the Stars” is “above” the presidency. Or maybe he doesn’t want the dumb-as-dirt woman to be in charge of our nukes. Palin can’t even run her family, or her state, she’s an inept idiot, haha.

Palin’s wig is nice though, I’ll give her that.

Live Blogging Sarah Palin’s India Today Conclave 2011 Speech
http://pun­ditcomment­ator.blogs­pot.com/20­11/03/happ­y-holi-liv­e-blogging­-sarah-pal­ins.html

Sarah Palin India Visit – Reactions from “Real Indians”
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=qZzVH0qPZ­n4&feature­=player_em­bedded

http://ind­iareloaded­.tv/articl­e/sarah-pa­lin-india

Purie, who introduced her to the gathering, poked fun at Palin’s “creative vocabulary” and her polarizing place in American politics in his introduction of the former governor.

Purie identified Palin as the “the sexiest brand in Republican politics” and frequently made clear that not everyone in the United States has a positive view of the former Alaska governor. “Either you love her or hate her,” he said.

Alluding to Palin’s penchant for sometimes venturing into unique terminology, Purie said “if I may be forgiven for saying so, she has a creative vocabulary.”

“Governor Palin, I hope you don’t refudiate me,” he said, smirking to an amused crowd.

If Palin took the comments as a dig, she didn’t show it

She struggled to provide pointed answers to several of Purie’s questions on foreign affairs, but was very much at ease talking about her own political prospects and those of her beloved tea party.

her entire Q and A that took place after her India speech, without any filter and presented by her very own sycophants at PalinTV. Nobody can claim media bias here.
http://www.palintv.com/2011/03/19/governor-palin%E2%80%99s-qa-at-the-india-today-conclave/

Here is the introduction of Palin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAwu8J7asuA&feature=player_embedded

Purie, who introduced her to the gathering, poked fun at Palin’s “creative vocabulary” and her polarizing place in American politics in his introduction of the former governor.

Purie identified Palin as the “the sexiest brand in Republican politics” and frequently made clear that not everyone in the United States has a positive view of the former Alaska governor. “Either you love her or hate her,” he said.

Alluding to Palin’s penchant for sometimes venturing into unique terminology, Purie said “if I may be forgiven for saying so, she has a creative vocabulary.”

“Governor Palin, I hope you don’t refudiate me,” he said, smirking to an amused crowd.

If Palin took the comments as a dig, she didn’t show it

her entire Q and A that took place after her India speech, without any filter and presented by her very own sycophants at PalinTV. Nobody can claim media bias here.
http://www.palintv.com/2011/03/19/governor-palin%E2%80%99s-qa-at-the-india-today-conclave/

She struggled to provide pointed answers to several of Purie’s questions on foreign affairs, but was very much at ease talking about her own political prospects and those of her beloved tea party

Right, Publius. I had to assume who was who. Crank it up a little so it’s easier to tell the difference.

meena140 said:
Live Blogging Sarah Palin’s India Today Conclave 2011 Speech
http://pun­ditcomment­ator.blogs­pot.com/20­11/03/happ­y-holi-liv­e-blogging­-sarah-pal­ins.html

meena140 said:
Sarah Palin India Visit – Reactions from “Real Indians”
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=qZzVH0qPZ­n4&feature­=player_em­bedded

http://ind­iareloaded­.tv/articl­e/sarah-pa­lin-india

meena140 said:
Purie, who introduced her to the gathering, poked fun at Palin’s “creative vocabulary” and her polarizing place in American politics in his introduction of the former governor.

Purie identified Palin as the “the sexiest brand in Republican politics” and frequently made clear that not everyone in the United States has a positive view of the former Alaska governor. “Either you love her or hate her,” he said.

Alluding to Palin’s penchant for sometimes venturing into unique terminology, Purie said “if I may be forgiven for saying so, she has a creative vocabulary.”

“Governor Palin, I hope you don’t refudiate me,” he said, smirking to an amused crowd.

If Palin took the comments as a dig, she didn’t show it

meena140 said:
She struggled to provide pointed answers to several of Purie’s questions on foreign affairs, but was very much at ease talking about her own political prospects and those of her beloved tea party.

meena140 said:
her entire Q and A that took place after her India speech, without any filter and presented by her very own sycophants at PalinTV. Nobody can claim media bias here.
http://www.palintv.com/2011/03/19/governor-palin%E2%80%99s-qa-at-the-india-today-conclave/

meena140 said:
her entire Q and A that took place after her India speech, without any filter and presented by her very own sycophants at PalinTV. Nobody can claim media bias here.
http://www.palintv.com/2011/03/19/governor-palin%E2%80%99s-qa-at-the-india-today-conclave/

meena140 said:
Here is the introduction of Palin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAwu8J7asuA&feature=player_embedded

Purie, who introduced her to the gathering, poked fun at Palin’s “creative vocabulary” and her polarizing place in American politics in his introduction of the former governor.

Purie identified Palin as the “the sexiest brand in Republican politics” and frequently made clear that not everyone in the United States has a positive view of the former Alaska governor. “Either you love her or hate her,” he said.

Alluding to Palin’s penchant for sometimes venturing into unique terminology, Purie said “if I may be forgiven for saying so, she has a creative vocabulary.”

“Governor Palin, I hope you don’t refudiate me,” he said, smirking to an amused crowd.

If Palin took the comments as a dig, she didn’t show it

meena140 said:
her entire Q and A that took place after her India speech, without any filter and presented by her very own sycophants at PalinTV. Nobody can claim media bias here.
http://www.palintv.com/2011/03/19/governor-palin%E2%80%99s-qa-at-the-india-today-conclave/

She struggled to provide pointed answers to several of Purie’s questions on foreign affairs, but was very much at ease talking about her own political prospects and those of her beloved tea party

HOLY CRAP

Careful there Dearie.

We don’t want you to wet yourself!!!

meena140 said:
Here is the introduction of Palin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAwu8J7asuA&feature=player_embedded

Purie, who introduced her to the gathering, poked fun at Palin’s “creative vocabulary” and her polarizing place in American politics in his introduction of the former governor.

Purie identified Palin as the “the sexiest brand in Republican politics” and frequently made clear that not everyone in the United States has a positive view of the former Alaska governor. “Either you love her or hate her,” he said.

Alluding to Palin’s penchant for sometimes venturing into unique terminology, Purie said “if I may be forgiven for saying so, she has a creative vocabulary.”

“Governor Palin, I hope you don’t refudiate me,” he said, smirking to an amused crowd.

If Palin took the comments as a dig, she didn’t show it

This is a trip!! Thanks for posting this. It is not acceptable for the mainstream media in America to criticize Sarah Palin for her poor verbal skills. Instead, they always focus on the content of what she says ignoring her poor communication. Because she is so uneducated she constantly either mispronounces or misuses words. It is refreshing to see someone so outspoken over her verbal deficits and poke fun at her in other areas too.

WillP said:
This is a trip!! Thanks for posting this. It is not acceptable for the mainstream media in America to criticize Sarah Palin for her poor verbal skills. Instead, they always focus on the content of what she says ignoring her poor communication. Because she is so uneducated she constantly either mispronounces or misuses words. It is refreshing to see someone so outspoken over her verbal deficits and poke fun at her in other areas too.

Last I checked, she graduated from college. And last I checked, I understand what she has to say.

nutsofast said:
HOLY CRAP
Careful there Dearie.
We don’t want you to wet yourself!!!

This must have taken weeks to come up with. LMAO!! You are a shut in , yes ?

WillP said:
I comment on lots of topics. No obsession. Politics is fun to follow. And with Sarah Palin it’s not just fun, but funny to observe her performance. By the way, are you still hoping for a Palin/West GOP ticket to go against Obama/Biden? Good luck. I’m looking really hard, but I can’t see Palin/West from my house. I’m going to try to remember something that I’ve read now. Later.

With the way that Palin was complimenting Hillary, as I’ve said I welcome a Palin/West or a Palin/Clinton ticket. :)

WCinWI said:
Last I checked, she graduated from college. And last I checked, I understand what she has to say.

*understood. :)

last I checked WCin WI “I understand what she has to say”
“I understood what she had to say”

something about glass houses?? lol

p.s. I believe she has a degree is Journalism, so perhaps you better find another brick.

Lover said:
That’s what trolls do.

YOU WOULD KNOW UGLY TROLL!

OxyCon said:
Palin a “dumb twat”

SHE IS NOT JUST DUMB TWAT,BUT A RICH DUMB TWAT!

mibwilso said:
Federal Dollars Spent By State Per Dollar of Federal Taxes

TOP TEN
1) New Mexico $2.03
2) Mississippi $2.02
3) Alaska $1.83
4) Louisiana $1.78
5) West Virginia $1.76
6) North Dakota $1.68
7) Alabama $1.66
8) South Dakota $1.53
9) Kentucky $1.51
10) Virginia $1.51

BOTTOM TEN:
40) Massachussetts $0.82
41) Colorado $0.81
42) New York $0.79
43) California $0.78
44) Delaware $0.77
45) Illinois $0.75
46) Minnesota $0.72
47) New Hampshire $0.71
48) Connecticut $0.69
49) Nevada $0.65
50) New Jersey $0.61

(Source: The Tax Foundation, US Census Bureau) http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html

Hmmm….anyone notice a trend about which states actually live more off the government??

VERY NICE!

WCinWI said:
If you don’t like it,

IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT STFU CHEESE HEAD! BETTER YET IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT MOVE TO INDIA WITH FALIN PALIN SINCE YOU UNDERSTAND HER SO WELL!

WCinWI said:
Palin’s awesomeness

HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA GOD YOUR A MORON! GOOD OLD FALIN PALIN SURE HAS YOUR VOTE AHHAHAHAHHAHAHA

Joseph Glackin said:
mibwilso’s list seems to not be understood by the toilet in Wisconsin.
I’ll simplify.
The redder the state, the redder the ink.
The “Welfare Queens” are in the GOP.

HAHAHA NEW PARTY NAME ” GOP WELFARE QUEENS”! FALIN PALIN CAN GET BEHIND THAT I’M SURE AND TELL THEM ALL NOT TO BREAST FEED!

What in the hell is she doing in India bashing the President anyway? Does she even know the people in India can’t vote in the US?

Snowspot said:
Palin can’t even run her family, or her state, she’s an inept idiot,

SAYS IT ALL!

the real john t said:
What in the hell is she doing in India bashing the President anyway? Does she even know the people in India can’t vote in the US?

REAL AMERICANS SCARE HER SO BAD SHE HAS TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY TO TALK TO THE MEDIA HAHAHHA ! FALIN PALIN IS NEVER A DISAPPOINTMENT FOR AMUSEMENT!

Who in the hell issued that idiot Palin a passport. They should be fired.

writer said:
Which side

THE QUESTION IS WHICH SIDE IS REALLY LAUGHING THEIR ASSES OFF AT HER! HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INTEREST JUST PURE AMUSEMENT! LIKE WATCHING JACKASS THE MOVIE!

Yet more proof that Sarah Palin and reality are not on speaking terms.

meena140 said:
her entire Q and A that took place after her India speech, without any filter and presented by her very own sycophants at PalinTV. Nobody can claim media bias here.http://www.palintv.com/2011/03/19/governor-palin%E2%80%99s-qa-at-the-india-today-conclave/

Not a parody, not a staged SNL skit – this is Palin uncut and unfiltered. Not even fiction has portrayed the reality of this airhead Sarah Palin. Note the ‘stuck on talking points’ delivery.

Bill Adkins said:

“Not a parody, not a staged SNL skit – this is Palin uncut and unfiltered. Not even fiction has portrayed the reality of this airhead Sarah Palin. Note the ’stuck on talking points’ delivery.”

Are you kidding? Have you listened to any of Obama’s unscripted moments? Without his teleprompter he sounds like a stuttering, stammering pot head who does not DARE to stray from talking points. She did better than he has at any unscripted moment.

Those who hate her will continue to hate her no matter what she says or does.

I’ve got news fr Sarah and the useful idiots that believes what she is spewing. She is the reason why John McCain lost.

capiche!

All over the internet her speech is being panned by everyone except her devoted flying monkeys. Even the guy who introduced her made a fool of her and she sat there smiling looking like the goonish cartoon character she is, not realizing he was demeaning her the whole time.

It is stunning how truly stupid the right wingers are who defend this stupid woman.

skyfet said:
I’ve got news fr Sarah and the useful idiots that believes what she is spewing. She is the reason why John McCain lost.

capiche!

That’s not really true, she and McCain were horrible candidates. Aside from that, no republican was going to win in 2008, no matter who was on the ticket. A tree stump would have beat any con in 2008.

skyfet said:

“capiche!”

No.

The reason McCain lost was two-fold. He refused to go after Obama even though there were serious questions about Obama’s legitimacy. He was afraid of being labeled “racist” by Obama’s media allies. And he would have been.

The second reason is the media itself. They made it their mission to ensure Obama’s election. They went after Palin with a vengeance while largelt leaving Obama untouched. It was media malfeasance at it’s finest. In short – they didn’t vet Obama – they endorsed and protected him.

Capiche?

Had they given Obama one tenth of the critical attention they give Palin he would never have gotten the nomination. You’re being conned by this man and his minions.

Blue Bunny, laughing, insulting, whatever. Publius wondered how I could tell who was far left. Not that difficult.

WCinWI said:
Yes, and some of these states (Alaska), it’s per their Constitution that certain Federal monies (oil taxes) are issued. Bigger issues to deal with other than Palin’s awesomeness. Neocon Obama and SoS Clinton looking more Presidential are much more important topics.

“Palin’s awesomeness” quantified:
http://www.anchoragedailyplanet.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1480:brennan-121910&catid=34:editorials
Too funny!

jim bronson 990cc said:
“Palin’s awesomeness” quantified:
http://www.anchoragedailyplanet.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1480:brennan-121910&catid=34:editorials
Too funny!

“Johansen confirmed what many people outside the industry have been saying for the last few years. Alaska’s taxes are among the highest in the world on new investment. And, worse yet, the risk is borne by the investor but the bulk of the reward goes to the state in the form of tax revenues. That, folks, is what you call a disincentive. If the potential reward is too small here, the risk capital goes to other oil provinces.”

I’m sure she has a very reasonable explanation for this.

Before the Trans-Alaska pipeline was finished in 1977, taxpayers in Alaska bore the second-highest tax burden in the country. By 1980, with oil tax revenue pouring in, Alaska repealed its personal income tax and started sending out checks instead. The tax burden plummeted, and now Alaskans are the least taxed.

A quote from the Tax Foundation.

California is the most tax prohibitive state to do anything. To live, to invest, to start a business. And it didn’t start with Arnie.

Harry Flashman said:
Those who hate her will continue to hate her no matter what she says or does.

THIS IS THE EXACT PROBLEM YOU LEMMINGS HAVE WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA!

I’d rather hate someone who isn’t making the decisions.

writer said:
I’d rather hate someone who isn’t making the decisions.

WELL GOOD FOR YOU! REAL PATRIOTIC AMERICANS HAD 8 YEARS OF HATING THE ONE WHO MADE THE DECISIONS!

I may disagree with some things Obama does, but unlike you on the far left, I don’t find it necessary to hate everyone I disagree with.

Typical Palin. She takes credit for the successes of others, and blames others for her own mistakes, failures, and shortcomings. Her inflated ego is an order of magnitude greater than her IQ.

Governor Palin made a lengthy speech in India which joined the dots on any number of domestic and foreign policy issues, in a manner that I have never heard from Obama.

Why not evaluate these issues instead of homing in a response to a rather flippant question. Also any honest evaluation of the 2008 exit interviews will conclude that it was Palin that prevented Obama from winning by a landslide. As it was his margin of victory was not much greater than that of George Bush over the lamentable Kerry. Even having 90% of media slobbering over him like lovesick schoolgirls did not provide a landslide.

To answer the Headline above: I really don’t think so !!! Geeze, when is she going to get over it and move on?
She has her little following and that’s it. Maybe THEY believe it, no one else does.

nutsofast said:
or President Donald TrumpHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!

Usually, I agree with you…BUT…No one’s laughing here !!!! Donald Trump is probably the ONLY one with enough brains and experience to be President ! You won’t be laughing in a few months, notsofast.

I don’t hate Sarah Palin, she is just delusional and that is really funny. John McCain is just an old man who has overstayed his usefulness to the nation. For some reason, when he ran for President he put aside his integrity and just went with the flow of the republican party to lie, cheat and steal. The idea that it is okay to demonize the enemy started with Reagan and just got worse. Presient Obama is not perfect, but he has stopped the decline of the nation, promulgated by the republican policies of TRICKLE DOWN. The rest of the change has to come from the bottom up and I think many of us have finally gotten the message. WI is just the beginning. The MURDOGs have had their day.

The supreme GAUL of this woman, honestly!

writer said:
I may disagree with some things Obama does, but unlike you on the far left, I don’t find it necessary to hate everyone I disagree with.

Why does Palin have to disagree about everything?

For instance, Sarah Palin, while governor, instituted a “healthy eating” program to encourage Alaskans to make better food choices.

But when Michelle Obama does it, Palin blasts it as some kind of big brother intrusion and mocks the First Lady when eating s’mores on her reality show.

Harry Flashman said:
skyfet said: “capiche!” No. The reason McCain lost was two-fold. He refused to go after Obama even though there were serious questions about Obama’s legitimacy. He was afraid of being labeled “racist” by Obama’s media allies. And he would have been. The second reason is the media itself. They made it their mission to ensure Obama’s election. They went after Palin with a vengeance while largelt leaving Obama untouched. It was media malfeasance at it’s finest. In short – they didn’t vet Obama – they endorsed and protected him. Capiche?

“They made it their mission?????” Every network I saw reported on Reverend Wright, some more than others. Faux News had almost nonstop coverage of Wright. Isn’t Faux News the top rated cable network amongst the news and commentary networks?

As I recall, most if not all networks had stories concerning the controversy over Obama’s birth place and whether or not he is a “natural born citizen.” But why cover a “story” like this constantly, if it isn’t true?

Obama was properly vetted. He had been on the campaign trail for a year and a half before the November 2008 elections. He gave his speech at the 2004 DNC convention….many people had at least heard of him. It was Palin who was not properly vetted by John McCain himself.

The reason the media went after Palin is that she is at best an oddity. An oddity running for VP, whom most never heard of, deserves some scrutiny. And, Palin’s responses to interviews, notably Katie Couric’s interviews, showed just what a dumbass she is…..so why not question her? She is a very defensive person, and she makes controversial statements….so, once again, why not question her?

There are several reasons why McCain/Palin lost the 2008 election, notably, reasons surrounding Palin herself. She is very divisive. Anyone who talks about the “real America” on the campaign trail is, by that statement alone, extremely divisive. She is not one who unites people, except her most rabid followers.

It is obvious that she is very ignorant of world history and world events. Many people do not want someone like Palin to potentially have her hands on the nuclear codes. We’d almost certainly be in more wars at this time if McCain and Palin had won the 2008 election. Note that one of McCain’s top advisors was Randy Scheunemann, a neocon and former member of Project for a New American Century or PNAC…..he and others in PNAC brought us to war in Iraq…..and now Scheunemann is an advisor to Palin. Arch conservative Pat Buchanan wrote an op-ed about Scheunemann, asking the question about why Scheunemann was an advisor to McCain, and also asking why McCain/Palin want “endless wars.”

The economic crisis did not help McCain’s run for the Presidency, especially when he said he knew little about economics.

Lastly, a number of prominent conservatives and Republicans spoke out against Ms. Palin, stating she was the reason they were not going to vote for McCain. These include Colin Powell, Kathleen Parker, and Christopher Buckley, son of William F. Buckley, founder of the modern conservative movement. The Chicago Tribune endorsed Obama, the first Democrat they ever have endorsed for President since their founding in 1847. A major reason the Tribune endorsed Obama is because of Palin.

Palin is an ignorant reality TV star (who, by the way, had another substance-less person on her Alaska program, Kate Gosselin). She is only in this thing for herself and her money.

McShame has a solid record of being largely despised by his peers from his chidhood, onward. Soooo many names he was known by thru grade school, high-school, especially the Naval Academy & fellow aviators. A career freeloader on the word, “hero” – which he assuredly was/is not. What a leader he would have been, out-of-control-temper & all. Read your history. Read Naval Archives. Ahh, but you don’t do that sort of thing. The likes of Palin & McShame reveal a huge clash between “intelligence” – and its opposite. The serious tragedy is that millions of the rancid masses of America actually find value in either of these 2 raging fanatics. Proof that a firestorm of ill-breeding, uneducation, & ignorance sweeps the nation.

The problem wasn’t switching around the ticket. The problem was, McCain was on the ticket. He ran one of the most inane campaigners imaginable. Although under funded and without a recognizable platform, McCain barely lost. I credit that to conservative talk radio. Mrs.Plain is two years down the road from her rather naive shot at the ring. Her political savvy has sharpened and she may very well be in the running.

Hey, caCONservative, you’re almost right on one point for a change. “He ran one of the most inane campaigners imaginable.” I assume you mean Sarah Palin, ritght? As for barely loosing by almost 9 million votes, that’s nuuuuuts!

She’s a ra-tard.

caconservative said:
Mrs.Plain is two years down the road from her rather naive shot at the ring. Her political savvy has sharpened

How has Sarah Palin shown become more politically savvy in the last two years?

Twenty four months ago she had strong support from Republicans. Two years later, she has lost much of that.

I don’t call that “savvy.”

“Too often, Republicans have the fighting instinct of sheep sometimes,” she said. When it comes to correcting the record, “I will put my foot down.”

Uh, no.. More like I will put my foot in my mouth and eff the country up so much you won’t know left from right.
Good god, doesn’t the woman thinks she’s the grandest of grand? I’m amazing how, according to Sarah P, not one other American can manage to do a thing as good as she can. Gee, how’d the country get this far without her?

Someone needs to prick this freakoids inflated ego so it’ll deflate a notch or two, or three or four. What a complete idiot the woman is. It’ll be a fine day when we’re finished hearing about Sarah P & her I’m gonna git ya, you betcha, crap, and someone thats actually sane takes her place.

writer said:
I’d rather hate someone who isn’t making the decisions.

You must really hate Palin!

Gads, my previous comment should have had think instead of thinks, and amazed, instead of amazing. Sunday morning after fog, hasn’t lifted from my brain yet.

If it is therefore and such that freedom there in Alaska and but it is that we and as well as those too have it also and then there is that which, I can’t think that it is so however which it is and that also but as Todd says there and to all Americans that of course it is my tight ass. – Sarah Palin

writer said:
I may disagree with some things Obama does, but unlike you on the far left, I don’t find it necessary to hate everyone I disagree with.

Then why do you do it?

Sarah, We Luv Ya Babe!! Everybody .. Group Hug For Sarah!!

Garth said:
If it is therefore and such that freedom there in Alaska and but it is that we and as well as those too have it also and then there is that which, I can’t think that it is so however which it is and that also but as Todd says there and to all Americans that of course it is my tight ass. – Sarah Palin

Who can argue with that?

jim bronson, read some of Garth’s posts. No hatred on the left?

Sarah Palin India Visit – Reactions from “Real Indians”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qZzVH0qPZn4#at=38

TEE HEE!!!!

jimmy, we expect all you far lefties to be hateful. What’s odd is that the left keeps pretending they’re the sensitive and caring side. Just be honest and let that hatred roll.

Color Me Badd said:
Sarah Palin India Visit – Reactions from “Real Indians”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qZzVH0qPZn4#at=38

TEE HEE!!!!

SAHRAH PALIN GOT PWNED BY INDIA HAHAHAHAHAHA

Color Me Badd said:
SAHRAH PALIN GOT PWNED BY INDIA HAHAHAHAHAHA

Wow she really did get owned. This is hilarious, Color Me Badd saves the day once again

Color Me Badd said:
Sarah Palin India Visit – Reactions from “Real Indians”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qZzVH0qPZn4#at=38

TEE HEE!!!!

HAHA

That was great.
Thanks

right-is-wrong said:
HAHA

That was great.
Thanks

Its so funny this comment thread goes on for 6 pages and that link shuts all the teaparty members down instantly. Brilliant CMB!

Well that settles it. Before the next election, we’ll ask India their opinions first.

writer said:
jim bronson, read some of Garth’s posts. No hatred on the left?

Garth represents everyone on the left? Perish, forbid!
However, I have seen some of your posts that were less than cordial

I like watching Outsourced. Maybe they’ll mention their favorite candidates.

Right you are, jim. With guys like Garth and the dear departed RRK I treat them as they treat others. For those who are civil, I do likewise.

writer said:
jim bronson, read some of Garth’s posts. No hatred on the left?

You’re beginning to sound like a big baby. Grow a pair will ya?

“As for 2012, Palin again said she had not decided on a run.”
Please Run Sarah, Run…. smile :-)

TeabaggeryUntie said:
That’s not really true, she and McCain were horrible candidates. Aside from that, no republican was going to win in 2008, no matter who was on the ticket. A tree stump would have beat any con in 2008.

McCain and Palin were quite poor candidates. However, your premise is wrong to suggest that any conservative candidate would have lost in 2008. A solid conservative candidate not hitched to Bush’s policies who expressed command and leadership over matters of economics could have beaten Obama in 2008.

Zermatt2 said:
She is only in this thing for herself and her money.

I agree with much of what you said. Sadly, while I don’t believe it is her only motive I do believe that the allure of financial wealth was the primary motive behind her resignation as governor. I’ll bet her lecture fee in India was at least 50 K. I do believe that if she is no longer considering that she was seriously considering running for president. So, it wasn’t entirely for personal fame and fortune. I’m just glad that I’m not an Alaskan who voted for her believing in her as governor at one time. What would this country look like if political leaders resigned immediately before raking in millions in the private sector. It is really disgraceful and unpatriotic how she reneged on her vow of public service to the people of Alaska.

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin suggested Republicans would have fared better in 2008 had she, not John McCain, been the messenger of change for the GOP. “I wasn’t at the top of the ticket, remember?”

Speaking at the India Today Conclave in New Delhi, Palin was asked why Republicans were unable to defeat Barack Obama in 2008. Palin told Aroon Purie, editor of India Today that Obama was able to cast himself as the change candidate, and that things might have gone differently had she been the GOP’s presidential candidate. Palin did not suggest that she should have been the nominee.”

Palin said no such damn thing, all this BS is completely fabricated..

It is the same type crap AP tried to pull about here Q&A in India, then got called out and had tro retract.

There are liars, there are damn liars, then there is Mediate the creme de creme of liars.

Classic Palin move. Throw others under the bus, including McCain. You betcha.

What does this woman smoke besides deer meat?
Run dummy eun.

It won’t make any difference who runs. Everything was so screwed up before the ’08 election
nothing can be fixed before going back to zero.

The dollar is dieing a slow death. It could have died faster before the stimulus package.

However QE 3 is coming and will help continue the slow death and extend the pain.

Fasten your seat belt tjere is a sudden stop out there within the next three years.

Hey there, I find an amazing web,please click the web ,you can find big pleasantly surprised
╭⌒╮WELCOME http://www.fullmalls.com/
—– ~ ¤ ╭⌒╮ ╭⌒╮
╭⌒╭⌒╮╭⌒╮～╭⌒╮ HANDBAG 35$
,））））,”）~~ ,”~）
╱◥█◣ ╱◥█◣ SHOES 35$
｜田｜田｜｜田｜田｜ CLOTH 15$
╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬ 2011 NEW

We have all been very unfair to Palin, we should support her run and pray for her!

WillP said:
I agree with much of what you said. Sadly, while I don’t believe it is her only motive I do believe that the allure of financial wealth was the primary motive behind her resignation as governor. I’ll bet her lecture fee in India was at least 50 K. I do believe that if she is no longer considering that she was seriously considering running for president. So, it wasn’t entirely for personal fame and fortune. I’m just glad that I’m not an Alaskan who voted for her believing in her as governor at one time. What would this country look like if political leaders resigned immediately before raking in millions in the private sector. It is really disgraceful and unpatriotic how she reneged on her vow of public service to the people of Alaska.

I also agree with you, that fame and fortune have not been her only motives. She was indeed strongly considering a run for the Presidency, and while I think the chances of her doing so now are lower, I don’t think it is out of the question. She really believes that her way is the only and best way, and I think she thrives not only on fame and fortunate; she thrives on power.

It’s just really a shame that would be politicians like her have to use the rhetoric she does and are as ignorant about things as she is. I find it interesting that Bill O’Reilly seems to be perturbed with her in the last few interviews I’ve seen him do. And, one of the reasons O’Reilly has been perturbed with her is that she was not answering his questions. She was giving the same old stock answer she always gives. To that extent, she seems like a typical politician.

It wouldn’t be so funny that she actually thinks people will believe that..

She and Joe the plumer were the biggest resion’s that McCann lost. There the one’s who started all the Obama hate.Does anyone remember palling around with Terrorist’s. There also the ouns who started the roomer about him being from Kenya. Unlike Sarah Joe went away.Sarah should have done the same after 08.

The broad is either just plain ignorant or is having a major brain cramp. hey palin – shut the pie hole and stop digging the hole deeper. She makes absolutely no sense – she did not answer most of the question the editor asked her and then the frosting on the cake was when she basically asked him to ask her about China which he did and then wow oh wow she got to blabber one of her canned speeches. One thing for sure there is no lack of LOVE FOR HERSELF. What a dumb, stupid ditz. So glad shes gone on to Israel so she can make a horses butt out of herself there as well.

Zermatt2 said:
I also agree with you, that fame and fortune have not been her only motives. She was indeed strongly considering a run for the Presidency, and while I think the chances of her doing so now are lower, I don’t think it is out of the question. She really believes that her way is the only and best way, and I think she thrives not only on fame and fortunate; she thrives on power.

I really don’t have a problem with her deciding to leave public office in order to make her fortune. I do have a problem with considering her to be a serious contender after she makes that decision.

I tend to think now that her ego and drive would like to be the first female president but her ego also doesn’t want to experience a humiliating defeat , perhaps in the primaries, while talking head money is still on the table.
As far as I’m concerned she has very little to say. It’s all superficial talking points aimed at an audience that is satisfied with that.

Old Duffer said:
There are liars, there are damn liars, then there is Mediate the creme de creme of liars.

Then why are you here?

Color Me Badd said:
Sarah Palin India Visit – Reactions from “Real Indians” http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qZzVH0qPZn4#at=38 TEE HEE!!!!

Ha!

Hey there, I find an amazing web,please click the web ,you can find big pleasantly surprised
╭⌒╮WELCOME http://www.fullmalls.com/
—– ~ ¤ ╭⌒╮ ╭⌒╮
╭⌒╭⌒╮╭⌒╮～╭⌒╮ HANDBAG 35$
,））））,”）~~ ,”~）
╱◥█◣ ╱◥█◣ SHOES 35$
｜田｜田｜｜田｜田｜ CLOTH 15$
╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬ 2011 NEW

You lefties are funny. You use comments from people in India to substantiate that your rabid hatred of Palin is justified. Maybe next they can ask the inhabitants of Easter Island what they think of her. If there are any negative responses, you can jump for joy. Like it matters.

In other news, the Germans still like David Hasselhoff.

Tedderman:

If you take into account the vast amounts of money Obimbo “the useless”, spent on the campaign, McCain’s reluctance to adequately attack Obimbo’s hidden socialism, lack of leadership qualities, poor Senate record, and his overt courting of known America haters and terrorists, winning by that narrow a margin 7.2%, is not exactly commendable. I see it more as, 9-Million voters were either duped, or the Liberal bottom-feeding, entitlement core of voters were counting on Obimbo to relieve them of more of their personal responsibility and place it on the backs of the workers. He certainly didn’t let them down did he? Yes Sir, Tedderman, Obimbo’s plan to take from those that DO, and give it to those that DON’T has certainly resonated with the parasitic core of Obimbo voters, hasn’t it, Tedderman!

KirbbDogg2000:

Sarah Palin, and Joe the Plumber did more to help McCain, than all the McCain speech’s put together. Joe the Plumber was responsible for showing us just how insidious Obimbo’s hidden socialist agenda is. And Palin brought an air of freshness and true American beliefs, and core values that have long been missing from the political scene. Without them, the number of votes McCain lost by would have been far greater.

RUexperienced:

When was the last time you saw Sarah naively submitting to bogus questions from the “left-wingnut”, Obimbo butt-kissing news media? She quickly learned that to believe the Liberal Press would be objective in their questioning was as stupid as believing that Obimbo actually has the ability to lead this nation. Both notions are absurd! Your concerned with her falling approval numbers? Why? Have you taken a look at Obimbo’s numbers? Maybe that’s what you should be concerned about and not what a women living in Alaska is saying. Your sick obsession with this women tells us your scared to death of her. Why? What could this women do or say that in anyway could personally harm you? Could it be that the truth about your misplaced obsession with the interloper is being challenged by this little women in Alaska?

I have one and only one question. How can anyone have a positive comment to make about Sarah Palin’s qualifications to be President of the United States. All we’re getting from the rightwingers are comments to the effect that we’re all a bunch of haters for criticizing Sarah Palin. I don’t hate her. She’s injected herself into the body politic and has to bear the consequences. I’m just surprised that so many of you continue to defend her. Where is your judgment about people, history and our heritage? What will it take for you rightwingers to raise your consciousness about yourselves and the future of our great country. Didn’t you learn anything from the Bush episode?

True, I am scared to death of Palin. That’s why I want her to run soooo bad!