Ashton Kutcher Defends Uber Exec: What’s So Wrong with Smearing a ‘Shady’ Journalist?
Yesterday, BuzzFeed reported that an Uber executive had made comments suggesting that the company should launch smear campaigns against journalists who criticize Uber in print: “Your personal lives, your families” would not be safe, said Emil Michaels, specifically naming one female reporter whom he wanted to target.
While the public reacted with shock and anger, forcing Uber to backpedal furiously, Uber investor and actor Ashton Kutcher didn’t understand why people were flipping out:
What is so wrong about digging up dirt on shady journalist? @pando @TechCrunch @Uber
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
We are all public figures now! “@RussADeCastro: @aplusk Depends if they are a PUBLIC FIGURE, like you, or not. http://t.co/ZFemzZshxV”
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
Kutcher, who has invested in multiple online news properties like Vox, continued to rail against the media’s tendency to report on “half-truths” and “rumors”:
I believe we live in a day were the first word has become "the word"
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
Rumors span the globe before anyone has an opportunity to defend them selves.
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
Everyone is guilty and then tasked to defend themselves publicly.
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
Questioning the source needs to happen… Always!
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
So as long as journalist are interested and willing to print half truths as facts… Yes we should question the source.
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
To be clear I speak for my self not @Uber
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
This should be fun… Here comes the part where journalist explain why they should be exempt from ridicule and judgement and probing…
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
After dozens of people explained that Uber had planned to blackmail a journalist and expose her family for criticizing the company — not simply question her credibility — Kutcher quickly walked his statement back:
U r all right and I'm on the wrong side of this ultimately. I just wish journalists were held to the same standards as public figures.
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
For a moment, it was possible that Kutcher realized public figures and journalists may have one thing in common — they don’t want their family lives dragged into the spotlight because of a vindictive company. And as a member of Vox Media’s board of advisors, Kutcher may have realized how awful it could be for a journalist to have someone threaten their families because of something they’d written.
But no:
#GoodForRatings #TrafficSpike #WelcomeToShockJournalism
— ashton kutcher (@aplusk) November 19, 2014
[Featured image via Everett Collection / Shutterstock.com]
—
>> Follow Tina Nguyen (@Tina_Nguyen) on Twitter
Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com