Twitter Blasts NYT Columnist Bret Stephens For ‘Defending’ Woody Allen: ‘Holy F*cking Sh*t’

 

New York Times columnist Bret Stephens caused an uproar on social media over his latest piece that was published Friday night.

In an op-ed titled “The Smearing of Woody Allen,” Stephens responded to a question posed by Dylan Farrow back in December as to why the #MeToo movement has “spared” the famed director, who she accused of child molestation back in the 90s. He argued that unlike Allen, Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey were “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” and that the “facts, not the allegations, prove it,” noting that investigation that took place decades ago concluded that the filmmaker was innocent.

Stephens called Farrow a “persuasive interviewee who seems absolutely sincere” with her allegation and would win the sympathy battle over her former stepfather.

Per Stephens:

But it’s precisely because Dylan’s account plays to our existing biases that we need to treat it with added skepticism. Most parents know that young children are imaginative and suggestible and innocently prone to making things up. The misuse of children’s memories by ambitious prosecutors against day-care center operators in the 1980s led to some of the worst miscarriages of justice in recent U.S. history. You don’t have to doubt Farrow’s honesty to doubt her version of events.

Nor have we learned anything else about Allen in the intervening years that might add to suspicions of guilt. He married Soon-Yi and has been with her ever since. Nobody else has come forward in 25 years with a fresh accusation of assault against him.

If Allen is in fact a pedophile, he appears to have acted on his evil fantasies exactly once. Compare that to Larry Nassar’s 265 identified victims.

Twitter reacted thusly:

[image via screengrab]

Tags: