ABC got caught with their pants down. This will be fun. They should’ve MANNED UP and just admitted they fired him due to pressure from Soros’ minion. Now, they must pay the price for lying. Bring it, Andrew!

Liberals are the worst totalitarians. They hate dissent and opposing speech. Color of Change was a group associated with Communist and Mao loving Van Jones. Proving that Communist lovers are the true totalitarians and haters of free speech.

Why not let him speak?

Liberals support totalitarians like Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez who jail journalist and close down any opposing cable news stations…so they are doing the same here in the U.S.

Sack up, Breitbart, ya huge weepy vag!

HAHA.. WHAT A CRYBABY BITCH.. HE’S GONNA START ORGANIZING THE WHITE PANTHERS NOW. and this tool is nothing but a racebaiter, and never should have even considered him for any panel

SUE THEM BIG TIME, ANDREW!
——————————————–

Democracy triumphed over Marxist Statism last night.

THE COUP HAS FAILED!

Obama, Soros, SEIU & THEIR Media have Failed!

GOP governors & state houses can redistrict Left-Wing Democrats into oblivion!
—————————————
Now, we change the government-dependency, group-identity Culture!

None of this will matter. The MSM will put its collective nose in the air, sniff with disdain, and move on. The fact that their blatant bias is out there for the world to see – and it does – won’t matter. They’ve insulated themselves in a bubble of absolute liberal superiority.

It does amaze me, though, that they lie without shame and with gusto and flat out DO NOT CARE if people know it. I don’t know how these people look at themselves in the mirror.

Weasels.

I never realized garbage had a brand.

However, I am pleased to see all my rightist friends so committed to honesty and objectivity in the media rushing to defend this notorious liar. Take heart. His brand was suffering before this, ever since his break-up with the great journalist, James O’Keefe.

Latin2 said:
Liberals support totalitarians like Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez who jail journalist and close down any opposing cable news stations…so they are doing the same here in the U.S.

Did Cuba ever have cable “news” channels? Most of the world seems not to have embraced them.

Still no story about Barack Obama’s senate seat going down in flames.

His “brand” was damaged?

LMFAO what a joke…what “brand” does he have? Being known as the old, bloated, middle-aged liar that he is? Yeah, that’s a brand worth protecting…./sarc

The Real Royal King said:
Did Cuba ever have cable “news” channels? Most of the world seems not to have embraced them.

There was ONE cable news station that Hugo Chavez could not control for years that was critical of his government…so Hugo Chavez CLOSED IT DOWN.

Fidel Castro spied on and arrested journalist who wrote stories that did not go along with his government. He imprisoned many journalists and reporters…and yet Liberals love both them.

T.C.

Great job…and no slouching. I take all the credit, btw.

You haven’t lived until you have seen my terpsichorean take on the score from the 1976 film “Carrie”….

Selectively editing video tape is what damaged his brand.

No I forgot, that is his brand.

…because Socialism does not like dissent. Van Jones was an out right COMMUNIST and proud of it. He loves Mao, and you know under Communism the media was tightly controlled and there was no dissent in the media under Communism. Van Jones helped start the group The Color of Change…the same group that threatened ABC to prevent Breibart from speaking that you will see on in Tommy’s story.

Van Jones, an ex-Obama appointee to the whitehouse was one of the founders of the COLOR OF CHANGE group, and he is an avid Communist and MAOIST…Mao who murdered millions and millions of his own people.

The walls are falling. The internet has exposed the LEFT everywhere, but most importantly the hypocrites and liars at the MSM. It’s a matter of time, but the game is up. Nobody trusts a thing they say anymore. Look at the approval ratings for those guys….You could win elections in the states simply by bashing the press ( easily done) these days. Hey George Shufalufagas, you cocktail limo liberal, how do you feel talking about pie recipes today?

They are clearly not getting a Christmas card from Andrew.

I actually think Breitbart has the potential to be an intelligent reasonable commentator, but he has to expect to pay the price for his past sins. Iff he can stay away from blatant dishonesty, be partisan but within decent boundaries,I expect to see more of him in mainstream.

ABC is going to take a major hit for this. They are now tools or MM and Soros. They will now have no choice but to out MSNBC, MSNBC. Good luck. You bowed so now we all know what you are and where you stand… with MM and Soros… good to know.

Nice job on this column Tommy, full, fair, and complete. Thanks

Whatever you think of the merits of Media Matters’ complaints against Andrew Breitbart, it is a breathtaking irony that they would do such a thorough job of documenting ABC’s hypocrisy, then congratulate them for using it to protect their journalistic brand. If fairness is to mean anything, it ought to apply to everyone.

What does fairness have to do with Media Matters?

JamesA1102 says:
Selectively editing video tape is what damaged his brand.

James, if I thought your brain could comprehend it, I’d explain the difference between an edit and an excerpt to you. Sadly, you’d never be able to understand it.

abc blew it big time. they should have kept him on and most likely benefited from his presence. now they just proved everything Breitbart says about the liberal MSM. This didn’t hurt his brand or his image at all. It did hurt abc though. it can’t be good for a national news org to be controlled by the likes of Media Matters…

JamesA1102 said:
Selectively editing video tape is what damaged his brand.

JamesA1102 ( who loves Planet of the Apes so much that it has becomea creepy obsession ruling his adult life) , you are exactly right . It is just like Fox Home Video Cutting the scene at 0’13’37/the chase of the teacher of the apes is longer by 20 seconds .

The Release Uncut Version of BATTLE FOR THE PLANET OF THE APES on DVD. Petition to Executives at FOX Home Video was created by and written by JamesA1102 (JamesA1102@XXXXX.com). This petition is hosted here at http://www.PetitionOnline.com as a public service. There is no endorsement of this petition, express or implied, by Artifice, Inc. or our sponsors.

tatboy said:
ABC is going to take a major hit for this. They are now tools or MM and Soros. They will now have no choice but to out MSNBC, MSNBC. Good luck. You bowed so now we all know what you are and where you stand… with MM and Soros… good to know.

No, not really. Breitbart creeps people out.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
JamesA1102 says:
Selectively editing video tape is what damaged his brand.

… the difference between an edit and an excerpt to you.

You’re right, Michelle-in-Utah. Breitbart repeatedly does the former in the most dishonest fashion, often lying about his doing so afterward.

And, I just gave you an example of an excerpt.

Color of Change, and Van Jones connection;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Jones

“In 2005 he co-founded Color of Change”

“his name [Van Jones] appearing on a petition for 911Truth.org, and allegations of association with a Marxist group during the 1990s.,”

Not only IS Van Jones, founder of Color of Change, a Marxist (Maoist) but he believes our own Government and the CIA were behind the attacks on 9/11.

So why do they decide that Breitbart should not speak…when they are KOOKS, and follow a murderous anti-American philosophy?

sarainitaly said:
abc blew it big time. they should have kept him on and most likely benefited from his presence. now they just proved everything Breitbart says about the liberal MSM. This didn’t hurt his brand or his image at all. It did hurt abc though. it can’t be good for a national news org to be controlled by the likes of Media Matters…

Actually, Tumbleweed, ABC was besieged by petitions and e-mails from many, many people. I’m shocked you didn’t know this.

Moreover, Breitbart participated in his own downfall by misrepresenting his contract. I rather commend ABC for calling him out on yet another lie. Certainly, something you and Michelle-in-Utah never do. Indeed, you both rather enable is lying and shoddy ethics.

Ah yes. ABC completely destroyed the Breitbart’s brand….he’ll never have cred amongst the liberally-biased mainstream media…ABC was his big break

Cry me a river, Breitbart. Sounds like another set up.

No Andrew you have no Brand, it has no credibility and you should blame Media matters for cornering ABC. Brand, what a joke.

Latin2 said:
Color of Change, and Van Jones connection;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Jones

“In 2005 he co-founded Color of Change”

“his name [Van Jones] appearing on a petition for 911Truth.org, and allegations of association with a Marxist group during the 1990s.,”

Not only IS Van Jones, founder of Color of Change, a Marxist (Maoist) but he believes our own Government and the CIA were behind the attacks on 9/11.

So why do they decide that Breitbart should not speak…when they are KOOKS, and follow a murderous anti-American philosophy?

Since when does Color of Change have any credibility since they were founded by a Maoist Communist and believe our government and the CIA were behind the 9/11 attacks that killed over 3,000 people?

If anything THEY should be discredited and not listened to. If a Brither group said that Keith Olbermann should be taken off the air…wouldn’t you Liberals think that was crazy?

King, you don’t know what you are talking about (as usual). It’s ABC that lied, not Breitbart. Even TC pointed that out in his piece. Clearly you didn’t read it, so here is the relevent portion:

If it does come to that, Breitbart will have an unexpected helper in making his case against the network. In their zeal to pressure ABC, Media Matters did an extremely thorough job cataloging ABC’s shifting positions, but providing Breitbart with ammunition in the bargain. Their timeline makes clear that Breitbart was clearly intended to be a part of the broadcast, and that he did not exaggerate his role.

Even God is laughing

The decision to create a ‘digital Elba’ was an attempt to placate the left, which they took as a victory. This is a clear ’screw you!’ to me, and my readers.”

I’m not sure that I’d want to use a Napoleonic metaphor.

Typical Republican, so greedy he can’t stop eating, like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck, The Republican fatties XD. No wonder Repubs are afraid of the poor, they can’t run fast enough to escape them when they revolt XD

Jon, that is one of the dumbest, incoherent comments I’ve read here, and that’s saying something with Ted, Iris, and King around.

The Real Royal King said:
Actually, Tumbleweed, ABC was besieged by petitions and e-mails from many, many people. I’m shocked you didn’t know this. Moreover, Breitbart participated in his own downfall by misrepresenting his contract. I rather commend ABC for calling him out on yet another lie. Certainly, something you and Michelle-in-Utah never do. Indeed, you both rather enable is lying and shoddy ethics.

Check again Robert BB has the ABC emails to back it up. They lied and got cought lying. This one is easy to prove. Bow to MM and pay the price. Lesson to learn… if your going to lie, don’t leave evidence, don’t write emails. From now on MM = ABC.

Read and weep, Repubs are greedy and love spending money, no wonder the three biggest(pun intended) right-wing guys are overweight. It’s perfect symbolism for Republicans. Big FAT spenders.

TfT said:
Nice job on this column Tommy, full, fair, and complete. Thanks

I second that!

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
Jon, that is one of the dumbest, incoherent comments I’ve read here, and that’s saying something with Ted, Iris, and King around.

Michelle-in-Utah, you do have to admit that, whilst the great rolls and mounds of fat don’t rise to the levels of Lard Limbaugh, Andy is a soft, portly, corpulent man. Perhaps, you’re a bit of a Chubby Chaser?

tatboy said:
Check again Robert BB has the ABC emails to back it up. They lied and got cought lying. This one is easy to prove. Bow to MM and pay the price. Lesson to learn… if your going to lie, don’t leave evidence, don’t write emails. From now on MM = ABC.

My only complaint about ABC in this whole matter is that they signed on the notorious liar to begin with.

King, I mean Keith, I notice you have no rebuttal to my previous comment. Not surprised, since you were caught being wrong AGAIN.

ps, don’t forget to feed prescious perfect and FDR.

In case any delusional individual thinks ABC was hurt last night without Breitbart – they came in 2nd during election coverage, just slightly behind NBC and ahead of CBS (and W-A-Y ahead of Fox Broadcast)

The Real Royal King said:
My only complaint about ABC in this whole matter is that they signed on the notorious liar to begin with.

I would agree that maybe it was not there best move. But once they made it… stick with it or you look weak, limp, and a tool of the leftstream media Soros is building. They wanted a member of the right wing blogosphere but caved to pressure from the left, in and out of there network, to keep their toys to themselves. AND then lie about it.

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
King, I mean Keith, I notice you have no rebuttal to my previous comment. Not surprised, since you were caught being wrong AGAIN.

ps, don’t forget to feed prescious perfect and FDR.

It’s not my practice to respond to inane comments, as you well know, MIchelle-in-Utah. Otherwise, I’d have to spend my entire life on this site just responding to you.

tatboy said:
I would agree that maybe it was not there best move. But once they made it… stick with it or you look weak, limp, and a tool of the leftstream media Soros is building. They wanted a member of the right wing blogosphere but caved to pressure from the left, in and out of there network, to keep their toys to themselves. AND then lie about it.

I understand your argument, and it’s not without merit. ABC created a pickle for itself. And, although I wrote objecting, it was a rather cowardly way it went about this.

This is very, very damaging to his brand and credibility.

But not as damaging as if, say, he had predicted in March that Democrats would pick up seats in Congress as a result of the passage of Obamacare. Somebody like that would really be damaged today.

It’s not my practice to respond to inane comments

In other words, I was caught being wrong AGAIN and just can’t bring myself to admit it. That’s ok Keith!

AnonymousFinch said:
This is very, very damaging to his brand and credibility.

No sure how damaging you actually think it is for him. How so and with whom?

1) He’s a hero for FOX, Newsbusters, Drudge as well as all of the right wing talkers…you think they’re writing memos excluding him or his content content from future broadcasts because of this conflict and the obviously extreme left wing ABC news? If anything, they’re probably sending him get well baskets and messages like “cheer up, trooper. fuck those fools.”

2) He may as well be the arch-enemy of the left-wing media according to every right-winger I see post here. So, based on that, how is that at guy who would likely not have any street cred with vast group of media organizations get even LESS street cred?

bealzebubba said:
No sure how damaging you actually think it is for him. How so and with whom?

1) He’s a hero for FOX, Newsbusters, Drudge as well as all of the right wing talkers…you think they’re writing memos excluding him or his content content from future broadcasts because of this conflict and the obviously extreme left wing ABC news? If anything, they’re probably sending him get well baskets and messages like “cheer up, trooper. fuck those fools.”

2) He may as well be the arch-enemy of the left-wing media according to every right-winger I see post here. So, based on that, how is that at guy who would likely not have any street cred with vast group of media organizations get even LESS street cred?

I was only joking. I don’t think its damaging to Big Breitbart at all. I just said that as a set up to the more important point. Namely, that anyone who was deluded enough to predict that Democrats were going to pick up seats this year because of Obamacare is really, really, really hurting on the credibility scale today. I mean like retire from the political commentary business hurting. I’m just saying.

T.C – How about axing Obama about his upcoming vacation this week to Asia ? Is he hoping to play any new golf courses ? Does he know that India has neutralized the falling coconut threat ?

http://www.emirates247.com/offbeat/crazy-world/mumbai-neutralises-falling-coconut-threat-to-obama-2010-11-03-1.312829

Will he bring us back any souvenirs ?

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/taj-prepares-premium-liquor-cabinet-for-obama-63954

Seeing 2012 From My Window said:
It’s not my practice to respond to inane comments

In other words, I was caught being wrong AGAIN and just can’t bring myself to admit it. That’s ok Keith!

I think my comment to Tatboy, an intelligent poster here, clears that all up, Michelle-in-Utah.

To me, ABC News has to live up to his own journalistic and professional standards and apologize to Breitbart. We’ve known for years that the media was biased, but I think many of us thought the good media org’s were also trying to be fair. Everyone has biases, but everyone can also be fair. Lately, it seems like only CNN of the mainstream at least retains fairness as a key goal.

Tommy, your post is both fair, thorough and interesting.

To me, media matters is a silly and insipid organization. Yet, they have every right to attempt to try to influence media makers. The smart ones like CNN would never let threats affect its decisions. It’s a sad day that ABC News would respond.

Breitbart’s only brand is lying.

shootfromthehip says:
Breitbart’s only brand is lying.

Yeah, I forget, why did Congress defund Acorn again?

JamesA1102 said:
Selectively editing video tape is what damaged his brand.

No I forgot, that is his brand.

That of course is the narrative which people who have not been paying attention were hoped to adopt. Every ACORN video came with the complete unedited transcript, as did the video on Shirley Sherrod. The guy has shredded every Lefty who has told lies about him as he will ABC. His brand is damaged only among people who are too lazy to do more than spout talking points.

AnonymousFinch said:
I was only joking.

My bad. Sorry..this gawd awful interwebz thing doesn’t do a good job with sarcasm….I guess I don’t either today..it’s gloomy outside. Apologies.

Breitbart’s editing of that tape was clumsy. There are so many examples of NAACP racism, such as inviting the racists Rev. Wright and Louis Farrakhan as guest speakers, that virtually any other tape could have spoken for itself, without editing.

bealzebubba said:
My bad. Sorry..this gawd awful interwebz thing doesn’t do a good job with sarcasm….I guess I don’t either today..it’s gloomy outside. Apologies.

No problem at all. It was hard to know that I was joking about Breitbart. But I’m definitely not joking when I say that if I had predicted that Democrats would pick-up seats as a result of Obamacare, and instead they lost a historically large number of seats, I wouldn’t wake up the next morning and start writing a story about somebody else being “humiliated.” I might deal with, address, or at least acknowledge my own humiliation, of epic proportions, before I started enjoying the suffering of others.

But that’s just me. I’ve never been so very, very wrong in an election prediction before (who has?).

How can you damage a brand that is already garbage?

Tommy, is this “story” your swing and a miss to avoid the biggest news of the day?

C’mon Tommy, let’s talk about the new and very improved House of Representatives. Hell, even with the surprising losses (screw you Nevada!) in the Senate, it too is new and improved (ie Manchin replacing Byrd.) Listening to the Obummer is great because he knows the Bush tax cuts are going to made permanent, Cap and Trade is dead, and the healthcare bill monster is going to re-worked and there will still be NO public option.

It’s lame duck hunting season against Card Check. My work isn’t nearly done.

I’ll give Brietbart credit, though…he’s smart rather cunning. I can see why the right wing loves him so much and having seen him on Bill Mahre, he’s pretty funny…I’d probably love him if I was a righty.

GlennBeckReview said:
How can you damage a brand that is already garbage?

Such as your own?

Breitbart is a loud mouth, self promoting, and unreliable source for just about everything, if it will get him attention. Read the profile of him in the New Yorker (May 2010) to get a sense of who this man is and what he is about.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/05/24/100524fa_fact_mead?currentPage=all
I regret that ABC News invited him in the first place and then reneged, although they did so because (characteristically) he publicly misrepresented his upcoming role on Election Night. And now I regret even more that ABC didn’t just ignore him, instead of giving him a platform to air his grievances (‘damaged my brand’ huh?), thereby unleashing, what, alas, is often too true on Mediaite — a host of nasty, name calling, uninformed, foam at the mouth responses.

Oregon Conservative said:
Such as your own?

You’re not representing your side very well…tsk tsk tsk

With all you libs seething with rage, I’d say Andrew is doing something right!

AnonymousFinch said:
Namely, that anyone who was deluded enough to predict that Democrats were going to pick up seats this year because of Obamacare is really, really, really hurting on the credibility scale today.

Isn’t a move like this fairly common during mid-terms? How many times have we had the old “switcheroo” in the House? In fact this clearly helps Obama because now the economy is essentially out of his hands. He would be wise to let the two (or three) parties out there duke it out and focus on world affairs. The balance of power has shifted to Obama because he holds the power to block virtually anything that is objectionable without being responsible for leading the legislative process. And in two years the blame will be shared.

GlennBeckReview said:
“How can you damage a brand that is already garbage?”

Oregon Conservative says:
“Such as your own?”

Everyone in America who pays any attention knows that Breitbart is a liar and a race-baiter.

If you want to question my credibility there, Oregon Conservative (who is probably a reactionary), be specific. You want to accuse me of a “lie,” then spell it out. I’m very certain of the lies and hypocrisy that I’ve nailed Beck on.

ABC + George Sors = Juan Williams and Andrew Breihbart + Fox News connection! Need anymore need to be said!

It worries me that a Hungarian currency speculator can influence our media to such a degree.

The Real Royal King said:
I never realized garbage had a brand.

However, I am pleased to see all my rightist friends so committed to honesty and objectivity in the media rushing to defend this notorious liar. Take heart. His brand was suffering before this, ever since his break-up with the great journalist, James O’Keefe.

I had a similar thought: being known as a professional liar is a desirable brand?

tomcable said:
Where’s Tommy’s breathtaking follow-up piece on the Dems gaining seats yesterday? I can’t seem to find that nugget of wisdom anywhere…

I’m still looking, too.

WOW, Tommy! Just WOW!

I’m very impressed and pleased with your and Mediate’s fairness!

Great article and Best of Luck to you and Brietbart!

writer said:
Breitbart’s editing of that tape was clumsy. There are so many examples of NAACP racism, such as inviting the racists Rev. Wright and Louis Farrakhan as guest speakers, that virtually any other tape could have spoken for itself, without editing.

Wasn’t the first snippet of the tape of Sherrod all that Brietbart received? NAACP found & played the entire tape!

Jon Martin said:
Typical Republican, so greedy he can’t stop eating, like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck, The Republican fatties XD.

Michael Moore, Rosie O’Donnell, Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg, etc. . . .

Rescuedog said:
It worries me that a Hungarian currency speculator can influence our media to such a degree.

Didn’t George Soros devalue currency in France and they convicted him?

juan said:

Michael Moore, Rosie O’Donnell, Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg, etc. . . .

Rosie O’Donnell, Joy Behar, and Whoopi Goldberg are all actors/comedians. Michael Moore is a documentary flimmaker.

Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews, Arianna Huffington. All quite svelte.

-ONLINE STORE—“ ==== ( http://xrl.us/bh5p99 ) ====

Christan Audigier bikini $23

Ed Hardy Bikini $23

Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15

ed hardy short_tank_woman $16

Sandal $32

christian louboutin $80

Sunglass $15

COACH_Necklace $27

handbag $33

AF tank woman $17

puma slipper woman $30

=== ( http://xrl.us/bh5p99 ) ==

I switched to ABC in hopes of seeing Breitbart or at least somebody not stained with their own diaper emissions, but then Amanpour heaved into view with her phony accent and I grabbed for the remote—no more surfing that dodissima channel, not with Nixon White House Defector Sawyer trying to show her Bolshie allegiances and Georgie-boy trying to be serious. Amanpour should be sent back to her Paris pied-de-terre for more baguette-tasting and insufferable arrogance training…!

juan said:
Jon Martin said:
Typical Republican, so greedy he can’t stop eating, like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck, The Republican fatties XD.

Michael Moore, Rosie O’Donnell, Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg, etc. . . .

Jon Martin said:
Rosie O’Donnell, Joy Behar, and Whoopi Goldberg are all actors/comedians. Michael Moore is a documentary flimmaker.

Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews, Arianna Huffington. All quite svelte.

So? Michael Moore, Rosie O’Donnell, Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg are Democrats. Tingles is svelte but Beck is a fatty? Seriously? How about Olby and Shultz? Are they svelte too?

Cry me a river.

Rescuedog said:
“It worries me that a Hungarian currency speculator can influence our media to such a degree.”

Are you kidding? You have no idea how much an Australian Communist collaborator is influencing our media AND elections, do you? Get the facts:
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/06/glenn-becks-boss-faction-unto-himself.html

welcome to :
====== http://dressgoods.us / ======
This is a shopping paradise

Credit to Mr. Christopher for telling the truth. Maybe there’s hope for some liberal partisans after all.

sarainlalaland says:
“Beck is a fatty? Seriously?”

Earth calling Sara, Beck says that Beck is fat; and he should know.

Seriously.

btw, I have never addressed his weight. It’s moot. All weight should be moot. It’s rather sleazy to even mention it.

Hint hint.

It’s hard to believe that his “brand” could get any worse. His website is a joke and he is most well known for misinformation.
On a side note, I now see that what I had suspected all along has come to pass. Conservatives have taken over this website at least in the discussion area and it always seemed to me that Mediaite specializes in the “fair and balanced” method of media reporting, which means giving voice to both sides of the issue regardless of how wrong that one side maybe. That’s why I dropped this website off of my rotation.

WHA-WHA-WHA-WHINE!!

you republiCAN’T tea-bagger asshats need to stop your cry-whining over everything stupid under the sun! i tell you what, you act like tantrum throwing children that need a whuppin’!

Breitbart’s brand is still intact. he was a known LYING POS RACIST, RACE-BAITING *SPIN* MACHINE before the ABC incident & he STILL is afterwards.

quit your wha-wha-wha-whining & get over it cry-babies!

Dear Mr. Breitbart,

We have spent the past several days trying to make clear to you your limited role as a participant in our digital town hall to be streamed on ABCNews.com & Facebook.

The post on your blog last Friday created a widespread impression that you would be analyzing the election on ABC News. We made it as clear as possible as quickly as possible that you had been invited along with numerous others to participate in our digital town hall. Instead of clarifying your role, you posted a blog on Sunday evening in which you continued to claim a bigger role in our coverage. As we are still unable to agree on your role, we feel it best for you not to participate.

Sincerely,
Andrew Morse

How can the “brand” of someone who edited Shirley Sherrod’s speech to deliberately twist her words into inflammatory statements and create a scandal for the Administration (and cost Sherrod a job in which she has served so ably) be “damaged” by what ABC, or anyone else does?

If Breitbart WERE to be seized by a momentary paroxysm of honesty, he’d admit that the only damage that could possibly be done would be to the constituency that already subscribes to what politically-biased hacks like him disseminate, irrespective of its content. They just MIGHT think less of him, not for his politics, but his transparent ineptitude in the editing room.

Latin2 said:
Still no story about Barack Obama’s senate seat going down in flames.

Why are you still typing? The liberal totalitarian regime forbids it? Right? Why aren’t the lunatic teabagging wingnuts silenced yet! And why do they still have their own channel? This was not part of the plan!