Politico Reporter Taken Off Akin Coverage Following Controversial Tweet
POLITICO reporter David Catanese caused a bit of a stir on Twitter recently when he reacted to Rep. Todd Akin‘s controversial “legitimate rape” comments by offering a defense “for argument’s sake.” The Huffington Post reported that, per a staff memo, Catanese has been removed from coverage of the congressman.
In the memo, Editor-in-Chief John Harris said Catanese “crossed a line a reporter shouldn’t cross on Twitter when he seemed to weigh in on the merits of Todd Akin’s comments.”
He added that the tweets “created a distraction to his own work, and to the newsroom as a whole,” as Catanese “made himself part of the story.”
The memo below:
From: John Harris
Sent: Mon 8/20/2012 5:33 PM
To: TP-Edit
Subject: TwitterWe have had newsroom conversations about the importance of good judgment on social platforms like Twitter and the perils of letting that slip.
Unfortunately, today offered a good example. David Catanese crossed a line a reporter shouldn’t cross on Twitter when he seemed to weigh in on the merits of Todd Akin’s comments — especially in a way many people, including many POLITICO colleagues, understandably found offensive.
Dave’s tweets on Akin created a distraction to his own work, and to the newsroom as a whole. They also made himself part of the story, requiring us for now to remove him from Akin coverage.
Today’s episode is a reminder that we need to be paying more attention to the ongoing issue of the right way for POLITICO journalists to be using social media. We have raised this issue before, and if you have questions about how this applies to your own work please speak with your direct editor.
John
Jim
On Monday, Catanese again took to Twitter to acknowledge the frenzy caused by his earlier comments:
Re last night: Bad idea trying to have nuanced conversation on highly charged issue on here. Did not intend to take a side. Lesson learned.
— davecatanese (@davecatanese) August 20, 2012
As for the tweets in question:
Ok, I’m gonna (ask for it) & defend
@toddakin for argument’s sake.We all know what he was trying to say . . .— davecatanese (@davecatanese) August 20, 2012
Poor phrasing, but if you watch the intv
@toddakin meant to convey that there’s less chance of getting pregnant if raped.— davecatanese (@davecatanese) August 20, 2012
So perhaps some can agree that all rapes that are reported are not actually rapes? Or are we gonna really deny that for PC sake?
— davecatanese (@davecatanese) August 20, 2012
So looks like he meant to say — “If a woman was REALLY raped, it’s statistically less likely for her to get pregnant.”What’s the science?
— davecatanese (@davecatanese) August 20, 2012
So maybe. Just maybe,
@toddakin didn’t really mean ‘legitimate.’Perhaps he meant if ‘someone IS really raped’ or ‘a rape really occurs’— davecatanese (@davecatanese) August 20, 2012
The left is often 1st to shut down debate as “off limits” when it deems so.Aren’t these moments supposed to open up a larger debate?
— davecatanese (@davecatanese) August 20, 2012
(H/T HuffPost)