I got Ann Coulter figured out!!! She is a white skank rightwing rapper that talks in what is the exact opposite of black rappers that is offensive to white people.it’s mean,crude vile and in the end does not mean a fucking thing.

Howard Stern with a vagina. The only difference is Stern is entertaining.

I never figured Conservatives as elitist until this women opened her mouth, O’reilly, a close second…

If Palindino’s comments must be extraordinarily defended why are we not asking Obama, the Clintons. the Edwards, and the Kerry’s why they are not for gay marriage?

Frankly, stats show that only ten percent of the population is strictly attracted to their same sex. The largest percentage of same sex sexual behavior falls among those who are attracted to either sex.

It is society’s interest to foster female/male couples for child rearing (unfortunately, in the way that we no longer do when it comes to easy divorce).

Why can’t the media ask Democrats who are running for office why they truly are against gay marriage, and why they think the public sentiment falls that way?

Why is THAT little question so very hard for the very people who put so much stock in a particular answer?

Cecelia said:
If Palindino’s comments must be extraordinarily defended why are we not asking Obama, the Clintons. the Edwards, and the Kerry’s why they are not for gay marriage? Frankly, stats show that only ten percent of the population is strictly attracted to their same sex. The largest percentage of same sex sexual behavior falls among those who are attracted to either sex. It is society’s interest to foster female/male couples for child rearing (unfortunately, in the way that we no longer do when it comes to easy divorce). Why can’t the media ask Democrats who are running for office why they truly are against gay marriage, and why they think the public sentiment falls that way? Why is THAT little question so very hard for the very people who put so much stock in a particular answer?

It’s a fair question. And, the answer, political expediency, is not pretty. It’s the early 21st Century political reality, however. The good news is that this issue virtually disappears in another decade or two. The vitriol is largely the Province of Cootdom. I stll scratch my head over how Mary Cheney and her partner or Ken Mehlman and his partner threaten my marriage or the institution of marriage.

I’m not so sure that this hurts Paladino as much as the media think it will. I very seriously doubt the gay community was going to vote for him to begin with.

Being the hypocrite liar Coulter is, why does she go to gay restaurants?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rick-jacobs/ann-coulter-on-the-gay-ci_b_70156.html

Sweet , charming and beautiful Annie will tell the truth no matter what .

the real john t said:
Being the hypocrite liar Coulter is, why does she go to gay restaurants? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rick-jacobs/ann-coulter-on-the-gay-ci_b_70156.html

Is there a reason she can’t?

The Real Royal King said:
I stll scratch my head over how Mary Cheney and her partner or Ken Mehlman and his partner threaten my marriage or the institution of marriage.

Well, since “all the Marys in heaven” is your lovely way of minimizing the mother of Christ and the edicts of your pope, I suppose that you don’t. No surprise there, it’s always been impossible for anyone to take you as a serious Catholic, or anything other than a Obama hat wearing control freak.

That YOU are willing to suggest that children don’t need both a mother and a father is not surprising. Neither is your glib acceptance of “political expediency”. However, should that excuse (which you find so acceptable) also be the craven low ground of the mainstream media?

the real john t said:
Being the hypocrite liar Coulter is, why does she go to gay restaurants?

Because gays are people too.

Cecelia said:
Because gays are people too.

Not to listen to Ann Coulter they’re not.

the real john t said:
Not to listen to Ann Coulter they’re not.

That’s a lie.

Cecelia said:
That’s a lie.

Here you go, go read some of her comments about gays and blacks.

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/ann-coulters-top-ten-most-disgusting-comments-at-gay-republicans-homocon/bigotry-watch/2010/09/27/13202

the real john t said:
#

Here you go, go read some of her comments about gays and blacks.

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/ann-coulters-top-ten-most-disgusting-comments-at-gay-republicans-homocon/bigotry-watch/2010/09/27/13202
Click here to cancel reply.
add a comment
» Cecelia | logout

Read them.

And?

Cecelia said:
Read them.
And?

You didn’t even read them, so quit your lying.

the real john t said:
You didn’t even read them, so quit your lying.

I read everyone of them. There’s only ten!

So how is she wrong? Especially in the light of the leanings of your fellow Dems who have run for office?

Cecelia said:
If Palindino’s comments must be extraordinarily defended why are we not asking Obama, the Clintons. the Edwards, and the Kerry’s why they are not for gay marriage?

Um….maybe because Obama, the Clintons, the Edwards and the Kerry’s aren’t out calling homosexuality brainwashing, perverted, and a disease like reich wingers do.

And considering that on October 11 2009 Democrats held everything I’m to assume that the hundreds of thousands who marched on DC were in fact rallying against Obama, the Clintons and the Kerry’s.

Oh but you wouldn’t know that because the right wing media have their tounges so far up the Tea Baggers asses, not alot of people knew about the National Equality March (even though it passed right under a window in the FAUX studios during a live broadcast with nary a mention….)

http://www.towleroad.com/2009/10/jon-stewart-slams-fox-news-for-ignoring-the-national-equality-march.html
http://www.queerty.com/what-you-thought-fox-news-would-send-reporters-out-to-the-march-20091014/

Cecelia said:
So how is she wrong? Especially in the light of the leanings of your fellow Dems who have run for office?

Did you especially miss this one:

“Once [scientists] find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted?”

When did the Democrats turn against gays?

the real john t said:
Being the hypocrite liar Coulter is, why does she go to gay restaurants?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rick-jacobs/ann-coulter-on-the-gay-ci_b_70156.html

How ‘exactly’ is a restaurant ‘gay’?

Kspraydad said:
How ‘exactly’ is a restaurant ‘gay’?

OH! We’ve got one smart one here don’t we? Try to keep up and maybe click on the link I gave.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Oh but you wouldn’t know that because the right wing media have their tounges so far up the Tea Baggers asses, not alot of people knew about the National Equality March (even though it passed right under a window in the FAUX studios during a live broadcast with nary a mention….)

http://www.towleroad.com/2009/10/jon-stewart-slams-fox-news-for-ignoring-the-national-equality-march.html
http://www.queerty.com/what-you-thought-fox-news-would-send-reporters-out-to-the-march-20091014/

So the Obamas are for gay marriage? Just as the Clintons and the Kerrys were?

the real john t said:
“Once [scientists] find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted?”

When did the Democrats turn against gays?

When they stopped giving them genetic grandchildren.

If you think this isn’t true, then you’re less of a Darwin supporter than was Jerry Falwell.

the real john t said:
OH! We’ve got one smart one here don’t we? Try to keep up and maybe click on the link I gave.

I’m not ‘being smart’…if you’re going to use the word ‘gay’ in this already heated and twisted environment…maybe we can use it to refer strictly to people and not places.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Howard Stern with a vagina. The only difference is Stern is entertaining.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Howard Stern with a vagina. The only difference is Stern is entertaining.

Now Jackie, as a tolerant and compassionate liberal , you’re not suggesting there is anything wrong with being transgender , are you?.. Of course you are or you wouldn’t have made that comment.

John T — LMAO .. you never cease to amaze , for the amount of times you’ve insinuated that another poster was gay, as if that was an insult , here you are bashing Ann.

murf said:
Now Jackie, as a tolerant and compassionate liberal , you’re not suggesting there is anything wrong with being transgender , are you?.. Of course you are or you wouldn’t have made that comment.

Well considering I was comparing the shock value and absolutely nothing about appearance it would seem yours is nothing more than a shallow, reading comprehension lacking reply so typical of our Tea Bagger members here.

How sad it must be to be so dumb and uninformed of the world….

Cecelia said:
So the Obamas are for gay marriage? Just as the Clintons and the Kerrys were?

Where did I say that? Did I not just say that there was a massive rally against Obama for the sake of gay rights a year ago?

And unless there’s a federal vote how do their views have anything to do with gay rights on a lawful level? Oh yea the major gay rights vote to be held in recent memory was overwhelmingly voted yea by Dems and nay by Repubs.

My bad…….

JohnT, why don’t you let a Catholic TRRK, who against Mormon heresy, defend gay marriage.

Will you always be a shill for someone who knows how to spell “erstwhile”?

Kspraydad said:
I’m not ‘being smart’…if you’re going to use the word ‘gay’ in this already heated and twisted environment…maybe we can use it to refer strictly to people and not places.

Why don’t you read the link I gave? I’m done with you, you’re to ignorant to converse with.

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Where did I say that? Did I not just say that there was a massive rally against Obama for the sake of gay rights a year ago?

And unless there’s a federal vote how do their views have anything to do with gay rights on a lawful level? Oh yea the major gay rights vote to be held in recent memory was overwhelmingly voted yea by Dems and nay by Repubs.

My bad…….

Well, the Defense of Marriage Act was sponsored by the Clintons.

And since the president is emblematic of the entire DNC, it’s not without reason that someone would reference his views to his constituency…

sheesh….

Cecelia said:
When they stopped giving them genetic grandchildren.

Why don’t you prove that idiotic comment?

Jackie_Treehorn said:
Well considering I was comparing the shock value and absolutely nothing about appearance it would seem yours is nothing more than a shallow, reading comprehension lacking reply so typical of our Tea Bagger members here.

How sad it must be to be so dumb and uninformed of the world….

Well if it wasn’t for the fact that your lib buddies have called her a tranny , urinal user , it’s hard to distinguish that with your statement.

murf said:
John T — LMAO .. you never cease to amaze , for the amount of times you’ve insinuated that another poster was gay, as if that was an insult , here you are bashing Ann.

JohnT has called more opponents queer than a high school quarterback secretly wearing a push-up bra.
‘
It’s the legacy of both the control freaks and the despairing people they so readily use.

the real john t said:
Why don’t you prove that idiotic comment?

It’s self-evident to anyone who isn’t a moron.

Cecelia said:
JohnT has called more opponents queer than a high school quarterback secretly wearing a push-up bra.

Why don’t you prove that too? You’re not back at Dollar’s Dump where you’re protected with his other 7 sheep.

But it is like it’s at News Hounds where you’ve done it.

murf said:
Well if it wasn’t for the fact that your lib buddies have called her a tranny , urinal user , it’s hard to distinguish that with your statement.

How many of your RWer buddies have called Rachael Maddow every name they can think of?

Burnnotice said:
I never figured Conservatives as elitist until this women opened her mouth, O’reilly, a close second…

The wealthiest Americans are conservative Republicans.

the real john t said:
Cecelia said:
Because gays are people too.

Not to listen to Ann Coulter they’re not.

Cecelia said:
That’s a lie.

the real john t said:
Here you go, go read some of her comments about gays and blacks.

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/ann-coulters-top-ten-most-disgusting-comments-at-gay-republicans-homocon/bigotry-watch/2010/09/27/13202

Cecelia said:
So how is she wrong?

The point wasn’t whether or not she was wrong about gays being undeserving of civil rights, it was whether or not her stance amounted to her seeing gays as subhuman – which, in my estimation, she does. And since you completely agree with her views, you also view gays as subhuman. That’s bigotry. Denying gays the right to marry is discrimination. And both of those words describe your ideology – bigotry and discrimination. Fantastic.

murf said:
Well if it wasn’t for the fact that your lib buddies have called her a tranny , urinal user , it’s hard to distinguish that with your statement.

They (including Olbermann) have waxed eloquent on her adam’s apple.

If you’re a conservative female, you’re either a whore a transvestite to liberal guys.

Give them a minute. It’s coming.

Cecelia said:
But it is like it’s at News Hounds where you’ve done it.

Prove that I’ve ever typed the word “queer” on any site execpt for right now. I’ll play like you sheep at Dollar’s Dump. “Or else apologize or retract the statement”.

Paul Westlake said:
The point wasn’t whether or not she was wrong about gays being undeserving of civil rights, it was whether or not her stance amounted to her seeing gays as subhuman – which, in my estimation, she does. And since you completely agree with her views, you also view gays as subhuman. That’s bigotry. Denying gays the right to marry is discrimination. And both of those words describe your ideology – bigotry and discrimination. Fantastic.

Well, as compelling as your self-referential argue is, I’ll take it that you also view all previous Democratic presidential candidates’ views as being the same.

Other than political expediency (I’ll say anything to get you to vote for me), they don’t have any arguments for coming out against gay marriage either, and you voted for them!

Give me a hug, brother..

Paul Westlake said:
And since you completely agree with her views, you also view gays as subhuman. That’s bigotry. Denying gays the right to marry is discrimination. And both of those words describe your ideology – bigotry and discrimination. Fantastic.

Nice leaps in logic, Mary Lou.

the real john t said:
Prove that I’ve ever typed the word “queer” on any site execpt for right now. I’ll play like you sheep at Dollar’s Dump. “Or else apologize or retract the statement”.

You’ve not typed the word “queer” but you’ve insinuated as much against opponents many a time. It’s your MO, John T. Live with it.

Cecelia said:
You’ve not typed the word “queer” but you’ve insinuated as much against opponents many a time. It’s your MO, John T. Live with it.

Prove that I’ve done that without the person insinuating that I was gay or else apologize or retract your statement. You can’t prove it can you? You just pull shit out of your ass.

Cecelia said:

Cecelia said:
JohnT has called more opponents queer than a high school quarterback secretly wearing a push-up bra.

That is what you said. So I guess now you’re backpeddling. You should run back over to the Dump where they love you.

the real john t said:
That is what you said. So I guess now you’re backpeddling. You should run back over to the Dump where they love you.

You should run over to News Hounds where they tolerate you.

No one loves you.

Cecelia said:
You should run over to News Hounds where they tolerate you.

Why don’t you go over to the NHs and see where I’ve commented on the mains in the last 2 or 3 months. See, there you go lying again and pulling shit out of your ass.

the real john t said:
Why don’t you go over to the NHs and see where I’ve commented on the mains in the last 2 or 3 months. See, there you go lying again and pulling shit out of your ass.

FIne! So quote your arguments that you’ve made there, yourself.

So far, all you’ve managed to say here is that if you believe as Pres. Obama does, you’re a hater.

On the unmoderated News Hound boards you’ve called more opponents gay, than Merck has NSAIDS.

Cecelia said:
So far, all you’ve managed to say here is that if you believe as Pres. Obama does, you’re a hater.
On the unmoderated News Hound boards you’ve called more opponents gay, than Merck has NSAIDS.

Please prove any of that BS, you lying drunk. If not “apologize or retract it”.

the real john t said:
Please prove any of that BS, you lying drunk. If not “apologize or retract it”.

I’ve only to type “JohnT’, for your opponents to know its true. It’s what you do.

Cecelia said:
I’ve only to type “JohnT’, for your opponents to know its true. It’s what you do.

So you can’t prove any of it. You’re just talking straight from your ass now. Maybe you should go to bed and sleep it off and quit looking like an ignorant fool.

Cecelia,

Back to the topic. Do you agree with what Paladino and Coulter said?

Cecelia said:
Well, as compelling as your self-referential argue is, I’ll take it that you also view all previous Democratic presidential candidates’ views as being the same.

Other than political expediency (I’ll say anything to get you to vote for me), they don’t have any arguments for coming out against gay marriage either, and you voted for them!

Give me a hug, brother..

Gotta vote for somebody, and I’ve sent letters to my Representatives, Senators, and two Presidents about my disapproval of DADT and support for gay marriage. If you’re suggesting the Republicans have a better track-record on homosexuals’ civil rights, then you’re trying to convert the wrong heathen. ;-)

Paul Westlake said:
Gotta vote for somebody,

Hey, you’ve got to take it easy on Cecelia. She comes from a little chat room that only has 7 little sheep on it. They’e well protected by their master shepard. Over there they can say whatever they like, but you can’t confront them or you’ll get banned like I did over a year ago.

Wow. Bad enough Palladino makes such poorly chosen remarks, but Coulter defends them. Dumb….and Dumber. I guess Coulter will say anything to get some face time on TeeVee.

I am slowly becoming a fan of O’really’s, as he is the only sane voice on Fox News.

I hope Coulter realizes that all that ugly talk is going right to her face….

the real john t said:
See, there you go lying again and pulling shit out of your ass.

Don’t you mean your “Democrat place”?

So this so called media site which is really a right wing hack job,,

Where’s the headline on this huge story about Beck?

http://mediamatters.org/research/201010110002#1023263

Patrick Henry said:
Don’t you mean your “Democrat place”?

I guess you can’t read to well. Why would I say that when Cecelia is definetly a RWer? You’re not to bright are you.

Cecelia said:
I read everyone of them. There’s only ten!

So how is she wrong? Especially in the light of the leanings of your fellow Dems who have run for office?

It’s amazing this one figured out how to use a computer and keyboard

ConLoonPatrol said:
It’s amazing this one figured out how to use a computer and keyboard

Yes it is. I think someone else gets her on the computer, then types whatever she blabbers out.

So wait, last week, Carl Paladino was upset that reporters where poking at his status of ‘home and away’ families, and this week, he attacks Cuomo for taking his kids to the Gay Pride parade.

Strictly speaking as an observer, this is called ‘hypocrisy’. I mean what happened to ‘Leave the kids alone!’?

John, I see she spends an unimaginable amount of time in the forums here at mediaite.. the poor wackadoodle must not have a life beyond this and Fox whom she soooo adores and cherishes. I just read at least 30 of her lunatic posts. She has a warped sense of reality when it comes to Fox, the 14th amendment, gays etc..

this site draws a lot of right wing loons I see.. I don’t know how any sane person can stand it here for too long.. These people are just blind and dense… and brainwashed!

(ok you right wing loons, be sure to give me lots of thumbs down!)

the real john t said:
Why don’t you read the link I gave? I’m done with you, you’re to ignorant to converse with.

I was going to respond…but then looked through the rest of this thread first. You actually have the balls to call me ignorant to converse with? Thanks for staying on topic ya nutbar.

Mann has a point here. There is nothing wrong with grown men dressing up in uniforms and re-enacting great historical events. Although the Battle of Hastings was a bit ragged, I understand his production of the Rape of Nanking is top rate. And, Idiott often steps out of character. When he donned a pair of panties and re-enacted the famous OSU Tri-Delt tickle fight of 1982, he showed us all the extent of his acting ability.

When Paladino’s statements are viewed in context, there is nothing to defend.
The real joke is all the libs here that say “Gay Marriage” is coming and that most people support it. LOL
In every election held on the issue it LOSES big time. EVEN in California.

I support civil unions and that is coming, NOT gay marriage.

ConLoonPatrol said:
So this so called media site which is really a right wing hack job,,

Where’s the headline on this huge story about Beck?

http://mediamatters.org/research/201010110002#1023263

While it’s a huge story it won’t get reported here because the commentators are afraid of the reich wingers here picking on them for pointing out how insane reichies are.

gordonbloyershow said:
When Paladino’s statements are viewed in context, there is nothing to defend.The real joke is all the libs here that say “Gay Marriage” is coming and that most people support it. LOLIn every election held on the issue it LOSES big time. EVEN in California. I support civil unions and that is coming, NOT gay marriage.

There is going to be a practical concern, however, Marceaux, I mean Blower. There is a certain clarity to marriage laws that domestic partnership laws by their very nature lack. The general principle is that a marriage legal where celebrated is legal everywhere. We carved out an exception for Mormon plural marriages, but otherwise that is a binding principle. So, first cousins may marry in Texas but not in Connecticut (I’m not sure the latter is correct, but let’s just assume it is). If Cletus Pratt marries his cousin Wanda Jo Pratt in Diboll and they move to Windsor Locks, the marriage remains legal, and all marital rights and obligations remain enforceable. The only way to dissolve the marriage will be by divorce.

But what happens if Cletus and his partner Clovis, having left Diboll to work in Connecticut return home to retire. Connecticut recognizes domestic partnerships while Texas doesn’t. Do they forfeit all rights?

I will say I understand your argument, and I am not comfortable with this distortion of marriage law. I will go further and say that I share Palopinto’s discomfort with bumping and grinding Speedo-clad men in a parade as I am with Mary Cheney and her de facto marriage. But, that’s a personal prejudice of an intolerant coot. I’m not sure that makes for good law.

Frankly, I see no clear legal option other than marriage.

ConLoonPatrol said:
It’s amazing this one figured out how to use a computer and keyboard

Oh, you have no idea! I still have difficulty cutting and pasting, and people go to bed by the time I complete a text message!

the real john t said:
Hey, you’ve got to take it easy on Cecelia. She comes from a little chat room that only has 7 little sheep on it. They’e well protected by their master shepard. Over there they can say whatever they like, but you can’t confront them or you’ll get banned like I did over a year ago.

Yep, so much easier to make your opponents go away than defeat their ideas when you’re a clueless rightie. ;-)

Paul Westlake said:
Yep, so much easier to make your opponents go away than defeat their ideas when you’re a clueless rightie. ;-)

Hey Paul, not sure if you noticed, but I finally responded on that Franklin Graham thread. I was on vacation so I stayed away from the computer as well. Very relaxing. I’m not sure how much more can be said over there though. We seem to have aired our views pretty thoroughly. However, I did go off on a religious rant about homosexuality. I’m sure you can find something objectionable about that. ;)

Haimerej said:
Hey Paul, not sure if you noticed, but I finally responded on that Franklin Graham thread. I was on vacation so I stayed away from the computer as well. Very relaxing. I’m not sure how much more can be said over there though. We seem to have aired our views pretty thoroughly. However, I did go off on a religious rant about homosexuality. I’m sure you can find something objectionable about that. ;)

Very funny! ;-)

I don’t have that thread bookmarked. If you really want me to stop by, I’d be happy to click on a link you provide. ;-)

Paul Westlake said:
Very funny! ;-) I don’t have that thread bookmarked. If you really want me to stop by, I’d be happy to click on a link you provide. ;-)

*sigh

Do I have to do everything around here?

http://www.mediaite.com/online/franklin-graham-muslims-in-america-are-here-to-build-mosques-and-convert-people/

gordonbloyershow said:
When Paladino’s statements are viewed in context, there is nothing to defend.
The real joke is all the libs here that say “Gay Marriage” is coming and that most people support it. LOL
In every election held on the issue it LOSES big time. EVEN in California.

I support civil unions and that is coming, NOT gay marriage.

Civil unions is just an added huge expense that might be progress for gays but ultimately pointless for those who think they are defending traditional marriage. It’s not a win. It’s smoke and mirrors for misguided morality.

Cecelia said:
If Palindino’s comments must be extraordinarily defended why are we not asking Obama, the Clintons. the Edwards, and the Kerry’s why they are not for gay marriage?

Frankly, stats show that only ten percent of the population is strictly attracted to their same sex. The largest percentage of same sex sexual behavior falls among those who are attracted to either sex.

It is society’s interest to foster female/male couples for child rearing (unfortunately, in the way that we no longer do when it comes to easy divorce).

Why can’t the media ask Democrats who are running for office why they truly are against gay marriage, and why they think the public sentiment falls that way?

Why is THAT little question so very hard for the very people who put so much stock in a particular answer?

I understand your concept of biased media is overwhelmingly frightening, but Palpatino clearly stated that homosexuality is unsuccessful. When a Democratic politician says the same, I will write my own article calling them out, just for you. If anything, right-leaning voters should distance themselves from Palpatino, considering their opinion that gays are affluent and elitist. How can gays be simultaneously “unsuccessful” and “elitist?” Maybe Palpatino missed the recent “Values Voters Summit” and the list of talking points they put out.

Haimerej said:
Is there a reason she can’t?

Thank you for asking. In the real world, people who are ideologically consistent do not simultaneously denounce AND consume services from groups of people they dislike. For example, those who are against illegal immigration and simultaneously consume services from illegals are hypocrites. Obviously, Coulter has the RIGHT to buy dinner wherever she wants, but to consume goods and services from groups you dislike is hypocritical, that’s all.

Jenigma said:
Thank you for asking. In the real world, people who are ideologically consistent do not simultaneously denounce AND consume services from groups of people they dislike. For example, those who are against illegal immigration and simultaneously consume services from illegals are hypocrites. Obviously, Coulter has the RIGHT to buy dinner wherever she wants, but to consume goods and services from groups you dislike is hypocritical, that’s all.

I don’t recall her saying you shouldn’t engage in commerce with homosexuals. I think all she’s said is that they don’t get to call their coupling “marriage.” Why does that mean she hates them?

And Ann certainly is steeped in experience about “brainwashing.” Yup.

Cecelia said:
Well, the Defense of Marriage Act was sponsored by the Clintons.

And since the president is emblematic of the entire DNC, it’s not without reason that someone would reference his views to his constituency…

sheesh….

The Federal Defense of Marriage Act was AUTHORED and SPONSORED by Bob Barr, past Republican, present Libertarian (how’s that for limiting government, letting the government tell its citizens who can marry whom?) But, yes, Clinton signed it. That’s far from being the bill’s SPONSOR.

Haimerej said:
I don’t recall her saying you shouldn’t engage in commerce with homosexuals. I think all she’s said is that they don’t get to call their coupling “marriage.” Why does that mean she hates them?

I never said Coulter hates gays. Coulter defending Palpatino saying homosexuality is not “valid,” nothing to be proud of, is dysfunctional, and is not as “equal, valid and successful [of an] option” as heterosexuality implies that she feels the same, which is that homosexuals are not as good as straights. In essence, the comments together show homosexuals as second-class citizens. It’s only opinion (and socialization supporting that opinion) that makes it so. I think it takes integrity to live by one’s words and patronizing establishments owned and run by gays is hypocritical in one whose words suggest they are second-class citizens.

gordonbloyershow said:
When Paladino’s statements are viewed in context, there is nothing to defend.
The real joke is all the libs here that say “Gay Marriage” is coming and that most people support it. LOL
In every election held on the issue it LOSES big time. EVEN in California.

I support civil unions and that is coming, NOT gay marriage.

How is 52% to 48% LOSING big time? I think 4% is losing small time. Guess that’s just me, I got a B- in Statistics.

Haimerej said:
*sigh

Do I have to do everything around here?

Well don’ break a nail or anything! ;-)

Gave a detailed reply over there. Enjoy. ;-)

chucken said:
I got Ann Coulter figured out!!! She is a white skank rightwing rapper that talks in what is the exact opposite of black rappers that is offensive to white people.it’s mean,crude vile and in the end does not mean a fucking thing.

PERFECT DESCRIPTION!!!!!!

Coulter is a hot Nazi, dislikes jews, gays, well everyone that is not a bagger! Hate and lies are a very strong fake christian value. Keep the hate alive Ann!

I don’t think Paladino needs to apologies for anything. He merely openly stated what most of think. With New Yorks Gay population at 4.5% odds are it won’t hurt him much. On the other hand, his remarks resonate well with the vast majority of New Yorkers.

CAconservative said:
…his remarks resonate well with the vast majority of New Yorkers.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA