The next question of course was ” So Jon , your wife’s boobs are they real ? “

Just because a fellow anoints himself “King” of something or other doesn’t mean he actually is.

….oh, wait….

Stern said he thinks Sheen will call in to Stern’s Sirius radio show Wednesday. “It’ll be two lunatics talking.”
BINGO!

Baba Booie!

“Who Is More Insane, Charlie Sheen Or Glenn Beck?”

I’m going with Sheen since Beck’s show hasn’t been suspended yet.

Charlie Sheen is a danger to himself and CBS. Glenn Beck is a danger to himself, to his Families, to Mormons, Fox, and the country (by rilling up the useful Idiots).

All we have to do is ignore this….but it is a challenge.

I’m way too old for this…but it is what it is.

If you are going to brag about stuff.

It shouldn’t be an effort to wake up every day.

Using massive amounts of drugs shoud not be a “credit”.

Hey, Stern: Pot Meet Kettle.

My vote goes to Charlie Sheen and Howard Stern as tied for 1st place.

Charlie Sheen. That was easy.

heard a funny story abt Charlie. Someone told Charlie that CBS was considering replacing Charlie with John Stamos and upon hearing this, Charlie torn into Stamos.

Stamos Twitted today:

““Contrary to the rumors, I am not replacing Charlie Sheen,” Stamos Tweeted. “However, Martin Sheen has asked me to be his son.”

skyfet said:
Charlie Sheen is a danger to himself and CBS. Glenn Beck is a danger to himself, to his Families, to Mormons, Fox, and the country (by rilling up the useful Idiots).

Yep, the 9/11 truthers aren’t idiots.

Emma said:
Hey, Stern: Pot Meet Kettle.

Howard Stern, former Libertarian candidate for Governor of New York.

skyfet said:
Charlie Sheen is a danger to himself and CBS. Glenn Beck is a danger to himself, to his Families, to Mormons, Fox, and the country (by rilling up the useful Idiots).

Always new skyshit was a 9/11 Truther.

skyfet said:
Charlie Sheen is a danger to himself and CBS. Glenn Beck is a danger to himself, to his Families, to Mormons, Fox, and the country (by rilling up the useful Idiots).

Well, Shit! There ya go!
Solved

notsofast said:
Always new skyshit was a 9/11 Truther.

Dummy! what’s the evidence that you are a Truther?

…Oh that’s easy–everyone knows Beck has serious mental health issues.

Watch how the title question scores on the Left/Right scale. The Left will stand with the drugged-out, over-paid Hollywood fake………………….and the Right will stand with the reformed substance abuser turned American patriot and Christian. Who knew……………..?

The most insane person in the world is Howard Stern, he is an egomaniac and he comes out periodically from his chamber of swill to beg for attention for his dreadful and dying radio pit.

His fowl mouth, of who gives a shit commentary is for the perverts and they have become obsolete just like baby Stern.

So go RIP Stern your days are finito!

I think what is really weird is…everything that we might describe in general is described in specific.

I just try to be silly…otherwise; you have to fight someone about some thing.

One of the biggest degenerates in the world is judging others? Funny stuff.

Olby Sucks said:
One of the biggest degenerates in the world is judging others? Funny stuff.

well yeah…

I don’t think that way.

However, I do think this way…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwmYvc56wLI

I just like the personal stuff.

Good work Mediate! You managed to find someone who had something negative to say about Glenn Beck. Congratulations. You people are really earning your money over there.

My dream is slowly becoming to invite all Beck haters over my house so we can watch an episode together and have you point out to me where Beck is wrong.

Dont get me wrong, no human can be on the air everyday and be right 100% of the time. But the Beck hatred is comical. To claim that beck is wrong even half the time one would have to argue that there is no such thing as people who believe that capitalism is evil, support hardcore socialism and communism and want to turn our country into something unrecognizable.

Islamic Jihad? Not even going there.

But basicaly, thats it. So please, go ahead and claim those people, those groups, those ideologies dont exist. I could use a good laugh which is always on hand when liberals attempt to articulate a coherent defense of their unthoughtout drivel.

Davo said:
Watch how the title question scores on the Left/Right scale. The Left will stand with the drugged-out, over-paid Hollywood fake………………….and the Right will stand with the reformed substance abuser turned American patriot and Christian. Who knew……………..?

What use to be right is now wrong and wrong is now right. People who love evil will hate the truth for fear their deeds will be exposed. The liberals are afraid of Glenn Beck. They know he speaks the truth.

The difference is, no one is forcing people to watch Charlie Sheen’s show.

Really quick, my link was banned.

Sinead O’Conner…she is a very weird Irish witch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwmYvc56wLI

Steve_27 said:
But the Beck hatred is comical.

Add to that PDS and you have some real psychosis/humor. And I don’t watch Beck nor do I think Palin is a viable candidate.

I’m stupid…if the guy has everything, why would you attack your own.?

Sinead was banned by Frank Sinatra.

How do you define art?

Howard Stern is irrelevant to anyone who cares about politics and what’s really going on. He’s old, outdated, and passe.

http://libertarians4freedom.blogspot.com/

Steve_27 said:
My dream is slowly becoming to invite all Beck haters over my house so we can watch an episode together and have you point out to me where Beck is wrong.

Dont get me wrong, no human can be on the air everyday and be right 100% of the time. But the Beck hatred is comical. To claim that beck is wrong even half the time one would have to argue that there is no such thing as people who believe that capitalism is evil, support hardcore socialism and communism and want to turn our country into something unrecognizable.

Islamic Jihad? Not even going there.

But basicaly, thats it. So please, go ahead and claim those people, those groups, those ideologies dont exist. I could use a good laugh which is always on hand when liberals attempt to articulate a coherent defense of their unthoughtout drivel.

There is no evidence of an Islamic caliphate working in congress with American Socialists to take over the world. No evidence. He admits that. He admitted that on O’Reilly, yet he talks about it every night. So, if he is theorizing on something with no evidence what-so-ever then isn’t that dishonest?

Penguin60 said:
Yep, the 9/11 truthers aren’t idiots.

Are you a Truther?

This yoyo better not go on Becks program and stick to having his yucks while Beck tells us what’s coming from all these lefties. Obama looks the other way when Fox news reporters are being mugged by his union contributors. Fox eventually will be the only news left and no liberal Muslim Brotherhood loving President (FCC forget about it) will be able to force us to watch the fringe media that no longer reports news as they take our country away.

Please Check out song called teapartiers I can’t hear you at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJfboOindCo

Here’s a verse

When he lost his commie czar it must have knocked off his sox
theirs actually someone reporting news but its only Fox
he still has another czar Chavez loving lloyd
he’s busy trying to make free speech null and void

Corpsemen in the 57 states as your dying
Jeff Jones will be laughing so much he’ll be crying
now you know why they had you read that death book
don’t you wish you had money like Rangle the crook
you invested 50 years to safe guard your health care
Nancy gives it to illegals and thinks that its fare

Liberals hate Glenn Beck. YAWN!

Beck was right yesterday when he said that if he lied all the time, like you libs claim he does, he would not be able to stay on the air. Your Beck Derangement Syndrome is truly comical! He ain’t goin anywhere libbies!!

Steve_27 said:
My dream is slowly becoming to invite all Beck haters over my house so we can watch an episode together and have you point out to me where Beck is wrong.

Dont get me wrong, no human can be on the air everyday and be right 100% of the time. But the Beck hatred is comical. To claim that beck is wrong even half the time one would have to argue that there is no such thing as people who believe that capitalism is evil, support hardcore socialism and communism and want to turn our country into something unrecognizable.

Islamic Jihad? Not even going there.

But basicaly, thats it. So please, go ahead and claim those people, those groups, those ideologies dont exist. I could use a good laugh which is always on hand when liberals attempt to articulate a coherent defense of their unthoughtout drivel.

My favorite is last week when he accused Snopes of being a Soros site.

skyfet said:
Are you a Truther?

A 9/11 truther?, no. I’m not a birther either.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Liberals hate Glenn Beck. YAWN!

Beck was right yesterday when he said that if he lied all the time, like you libs claim he does, he would not be able to stay on the air. Your Beck Derangement Syndrome is truly comical! He ain’t goin anywhere libbies!!

Yeah like FAUX cares if they broadcast the truth or not. You bagger loons have proves you’ll eat up any piece of shit Beck and Hannity throw your way.

Steve_27 said:
To claim that beck is wrong even half the time one would have to argue that there is no such thing as people who believe that capitalism is evil, support hardcore socialism and communism and want to turn our country into something unrecognizable.

I don’t think this is accurate. Who has ever argued that the extremes don’t exist at all? That’s not really the issue with what Beck does. You might want to look at what conservatives have said who criticize Beck. It’s a more thoughtful analysis than “Oh that guys a lunatic”

kvon said:
There is no evidence of an Islamic caliphate working in congress with American Socialists to take over the world. No evidence. He admits that. He admitted that on O’Reilly, yet he talks about it every night. So, if he is theorizing on something with no evidence what-so-ever then isn’t that dishonest?

Huh? When did Beck say anything about “caliphate working in congress with American Socialists”? Never happened. There are many people calling for a caliphate in the Middle East and they do it in public and on tape. You are like all the lying libs posting here, you just make up things.

Kvon,
I’ve been waiting for days for you to back up your claim that the Tea Party is violent. If it’s as violent as you say, why are you having such a problem providing the evidence? I could give you 10 links to left wing violent rhetoric in just the last couple weeks.

CosmosDan said:
Who has ever argued that the extremes don’t exist at all?

Yeah, just look at the post above. Broad generalizations, the last refuge of a small mind.
Speaking as a conservative you have to look at what Beck, Hannity, Rush really are. Entertainers. Can there be truth in what they say?, of course. Just how much is truth and how much is show biz needs to be seperated. Same goes for Maddow, olberman, O’Donnell.

Penguin60 said:
Add to that PDS and you have some real psychosis/humor. And I don’t watch Beck nor do I think Palin is a viable candidate.

Neal was a great pick up for when Crosby and malkin come back, whenever that is.

Steve_27 said:
Neal was a great pick up for when Crosby and malkin come back, whenever that is.

Malkin’s out for good this season. Rumors are so is Crosby, don’t know that for sure. Kovalev made a noce return, he can still shoot for an old man.

Easy: Glenn Beck

Penguin60 said:
Yeah, just look at the post above. Broad generalizations, the last refuge of a small mind.
Speaking as a conservative you have to look at what Beck, Hannity, Rush really are. Entertainers. Can there be truth in what they say?, of course. Just how much is truth and how much is show biz needs to be seperated. Same goes for Maddow, olberman, O’Donnell.

I agree. That’s my biggest disappointment with the 24/7 news channels is they focus far too much on entertainment so they exaggerate conflict and fuel outrage when maybe just factual analysis would be far more helpful.
I have no problem with a pundit saying “Hey look, I’m a conservative, or I’m a liberal” but that shouldn’t prevent them from being factual, and relatively fair and reasonable. It seems the push for ratings does a lot of that.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Liberals hate Glenn Beck. YAWN!

Beck was right yesterday when he said that if he lied all the time, like you libs claim he does, he would not be able to stay on the air. Your Beck Derangement Syndrome is truly comical! He ain’t goin anywhere libbies!!

The National Enquirer has been around a long time.

Nice try Dan, but you know that if did indeed lie everyday like libs claim, he would not still be on the air.

kvon said:
There is no evidence of an Islamic caliphate working in congress with American Socialists to take over the world. No evidence. He admits that. He admitted that on O’Reilly, yet he talks about it every night. So, if he is theorizing on something with no evidence what-so-ever then isn’t that dishonest?

If he says on his show that there is a caliphate in congress then says on O’Rielly that there isn’t, then that would simply be inconsistant and wrong. I haven’t seen that. When I watch, he does lots of warning, he’s entitled to his opinion and your free to watch something else and no, it has nothing in the world to do with “dishonest.”

The basics still stand: Are there Jihadist out there with the goal of a caliphate, including the US? Of course there, that is not debatable. Are there socialist involved with our politics? BIG YES to that too! So when you lash out at Beck, why are you doing so again?

Howie must not be doing as well as his paycheck portrays.
Why else would he be doing as many interviews on these “talk” show?
The truly crazy person is one who takes any of the talk show hosts seriously and actually signs their paychecks.

CosmosDan said:
I don’t think this is accurate. Who has ever argued that the extremes don’t exist at all? That’s not really the issue with what Beck does. You might want to look at what conservatives have said who criticize Beck. It’s a more thoughtful analysis than “Oh that guys a lunatic”

Your comment simply dont apply to what mine was addressing. There certainly are far left wingers who dismiss Beck as an ignorant lying hate monger. Thats who i’m referring to. If your talking about “conservatives” that are denouncing Beck, I doubt they sound anything like the leftist. If you have any examples of lets say, Rove, claiming “Beck is a lying rebel rousing lunatic,” then I would love for you to tell me where I can read that.

Penguin60 said:
Malkin’s out for good this season. Rumors are so is Crosby, don’t know that for sure. Kovalev made a noce return, he can still shoot for an old man.

Kovi made his debut at MSG against the the Hartford Whalers. I literaly jumped out of my seat the first few times he had the puck, he was my hero and the best stick handler ever. I wish the old man well with the hated Penguins ;)

In a column for The Weekly Standard, editor and Fox News contributor William Kristol criticizes Beck for his “hysteria” and attacks other conservatives for being “so fearful of a popular awakening that they side with the dictator against the democrats.”

From Kristol’s column:

Now, people are more than entitled to their own opinions of how best to accomplish that democratic end. And it’s a sign of health that a political and intellectual movement does not respond to a complicated set of developments with one voice.

But hysteria is not a sign of health. When Glenn Beck rants about the caliphate taking over the Middle East from Morocco to the Philippines, and lists (invents?) the connections between caliphate-promoters and the American left, he brings to mind no one so much as Robert Welch and the John Birch Society. He’s marginalizing himself, just as his predecessors did back in the early 1960s.

AND

On NRO’s The Corner, National Review editor and Fox News contributor Rich Lowry sides with Kristol, writing that he “takes a well-deserved shot at Glenn Beck’s latest wild theorizing.”

When conservatives like Bill Kristol and Rich Lowry say Beck is “hysterical,” it’s pretty clear that the guy is out there. Bill O looks up at the sky and rolls his eyes when Beck comes on his show and parades out his latest lunatic rant.

Come on people, if established members of the conservative media think Beck is doing conservatives a disservice, you might want to pay attention.

P.S.: Charlie Sheen (channelling Winston Churchill): Mr. Beck, if I go into rehab, tomorrow I shall be sober, but you will still be insane.

Gadhafi and charlie sheen…

…Name two people whose careers are deader than a door nail.

Operators are standing by, so VOTE NOW:

Gadhafi vs. charlie sheen — which one of these despicable, depraved clowns is funnier?

Just think: if sheen overindulges on coke and hookers and gadhafi leaves his cushy ruler-for-life gig in Libya, the C(ertified)B(iased)S(ocialists) network will have an immediately replacement to star in “Two and a Half Men”. They don’t call the VD-infected and drug-crazed gadhafi the “charlie sheen of lybia” for nothing.

BTW: does anybody know if sheen is related to mel gibson? They seem to have a lot in common.

Will he sue? “Wouldn’t you? I’m out of a job. I got a whole family to support.”

…Sheen’s “family”: 18547 hookers and 4276 drug dealers.

Q: How can you tell that charlie sheen has stopped using drugs?
A: The economy of mexico collapses.

Q: How can you tell that charlie sheen is still using massive amounts of coke and other drugs?
A: He attends one of “You Lie!” hussein’s daily White House parties.

Steve_27 said:
Your comment simply dont apply to what mine was addressing. There certainly are far left wingers who dismiss Beck as an ignorant lying hate monger. Thats who i’m referring to. If your talking about “conservatives” that are denouncing Beck, I doubt they sound anything like the leftist. If you have any examples of lets say, Rove, claiming “Beck is a lying rebel rousing lunatic,” then I would love for you to tell me where I can read that.

I’m sure there are plenty of folks on the left who dismiss Beck without really analyzing what he’s doing. Lying, hate monger may be hyperbole , but exaggerating fear monger wouldn’t be. My point was, no one has to deny the groups Beck talks about exists to find him to be a conspiracy theory nut. Personally, I don’t find him to be a nut but just a showman who gets rich spouting what he does, without much concern for the good of bad results.
My other point is that if you look at solid conservatives who have analysed what he does their opinion is he detracts from a serious dialog much more than he contributes with his careless handling of information.

Beck’s bread and butter is exaggeration , but your objection to Beck haters is they exaggerate about him, is that it?

Liberal Tormentor said:
Nice try Dan, but you know that if did indeed lie everyday like libs claim, he would not still be on the air.

Missed my point completely didn’t ya?

The National Enquirer makes millions out of exaggeration and the spreading of rumors , choosing words that kept them from being sued, {most of the time} It’s a pointless oversimplification to make the statement you’ve made, {and that Glenn makes?} There’s a difference between outright lies, and the kind of hyperbolic paranoid speculation Beck does. That doesn’t make the latter any more valuable than the former.

Insanity is a legal term and the rule is the inability to know that an act is wrong. The old ALI rule no longer applies, “must appreciate the consequences of an action” or have a mental health or other difficulty making it impossible to follow the law.

While both Charlie and Glenn are out of touch with reality and like psychotic they are not insane by definition. Beck is in worse condition than Charlie, he has a better ability to channel his delusional views into a right wing Christian rant. In terms of mental illness, as a mental health professional, Beck is by far the worst case of mental illness every exposed to the American people through journalism. He is less of a mad man than Father Conklin.

Anyone really think Howard Stern wants to help Charlie Sheen? Or does he just want him to come on his show so he can throw slices of bologna on his bare ass?

Mark Joyella’s article said:
Stern said he thinks Sheen will call in to Stern’s Sirius radio show Wednesday. “It’ll be two lunatics talking.”

I think Stern nailed that one.

notsofast said:
Always new skyshit was a 9/11 Truther.

skyfet said:
Dummy! what’s the evidence that you are a Truther?

LOL- Hey, idiot, I said you where a Truther not me, son.

Get an education- learn to read, son!

Steve_27 said:
My dream is slowly becoming to invite all Beck haters over my house so we can watch an episode together and have you point out to me where Beck is wrong.

Dont get me wrong, no human can be on the air everyday and be right 100% of the time. But the Beck hatred is comical. To claim that beck is wrong even half the time one would have to argue that there is no such thing as people who believe that capitalism is evil, support hardcore socialism and communism and want to turn our country into something unrecognizable.

This part of your post seems so reasonable, maybe seeing how often Beck is clearly wrong with the facts may give you pause: http://politifact.com/personalities/glenn-beck/

Regardless of whether he is mistaken or just lying, does it really matter in terms of the harm he causes this country by spreading false information and using it to substantiate the “hysteria” (per William Kristol) of his crazy conspiracy theories?

A better question would have been which one of them has the bigger ego.

Davo said:
Watch how the title question scores on the Left/Right scale. The Left will stand with the drugged-out, over-paid Hollywood fake………………….and the Right will stand with the reformed substance abuser turned American patriot and Christian. Who knew……………..?

Bump………

CosmosDan said:
. Personally, I don’t find him to be a nut but just a showman who gets rich spouting what he does, without much concern for the good of bad results.

Per: Glenn Beck…

Yeah, so what. You shouldn’t be worried about the types he might attract.. The more people yell, the more people yell back.

Just be aware that broadcasters might use subtle messages to influence their viewers.

Steve_27 says:
“My dream is slowly becoming to invite all Beck haters over my house so we can watch an episode together and have you point out to me where Beck is wrong.
Dont get me wrong, no human can be on the air everyday and be right 100% of the time. But the Beck hatred is comical. To claim that beck is wrong even half the time one would have to argue that there is no such thing as people who believe that capitalism is evil, support hardcore socialism and communism and want to turn our country into something unrecognizable.
Islamic Jihad? Not even going there.
But basicaly, thats it. So please, go ahead and claim those people, those groups, those ideologies dont exist. I could use a good laugh which is always on hand when liberals attempt to articulate a coherent defense of their unthoughtout drivel.”

Where to begin. The sign behind Beck last night, one of many, that said 350 and had a communist logo next to it. Well the co-founder of 350.org was quite surprised to find out that he’s a communist.

Next: Beck called Van Jones a communist again, but Van Jones is not a communist any more than Beck is a drunk. The tense of the verb is Beck’s lie about Van Jones.

Next: Beck claimed that the media is calling Gov. Walker “evil.” That’s a blatant lie.

Next: Beck’s attack on Detroit was absurd. Without bailing out the auto industry that Beck argued should have been let go, over a million more people would have lost their jobs and Detroit would be in MUCH worse shape. Sarah Jones addressed more of Beck’s assault on Detroit: http://www.politicususa.com/en/eminem-glenn-beck-detroit

I tell you what: if you read this Steve, you go to where I list Beck’s False Claims and you show where I have my facts wrong. YOu show the Jewish authors I republish where Beck is not an anti-Semite. Being a Zionist is not good enough. You go to the list of hypocrisies and find where I have any of them wrong. You go to where I have the list of examples showing that Beck is a charlatan due mostly to lack of education, and show where he’s “real.”

If you think that Beck is right, that the Constitution is supported like he says, by “faith, hope and charity,” then YOU NEED TO GET REAL! If there is unthoughtful drivel coming from anywhere, it’s coming from Glenn Beck. C’mon, Steve: take my challenge: show me where I have my facts about Beck wrong:
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2010/06/contents.html

Every expert on the Middle East is calling Beck profoundly ignorant about the Middle East. The conspiracy he’s claiming, and then backing away from in front of O’Reilly last Friday, between reactionary Islamists and radicals in the West doesn’t exist. They have different goals and different directions, one side forward, one side (like Beck) backward. To argue as Beck is that they want the same thing is utterly absurd. O’Reilly knows this because unlike Beck and his army of psychotics, O’Reilly at least went to college.

Yes Steve, I’d love this debate. Get a Google ID and take it up with me at the Review. I’ll show you how Beck blends facts and fictions to create, not a news story, not a true story, but a false narrative he uses to scare conservatives who are easily frightened and respond to fear-mongering the way Beck wants.

GlennBeckReview said:
The tense of the verb is I LIE about Glenn Beck when he plays tapes of Van Jones admitting he is a commie.

YOU TELL ‘EM DADDY! (That’s my daddy who said that!)

My daddy has a poster of Howard Stern taped to the ceiling so mommy can enjoy sex.

Will you please buy me a kitten?

Oh, and by the way, I want all of you to stop spreading it around that GBR actually stands for Goober Brained Retard.

Why, it’s true!

We are talking about the “Glenn Beck Revival” aren’t we?

Davo said:
….and the Right will stand with the reformed substance abuser turned American patriot and Christian. Who knew……………..?

According to a good Christian website, Glenn Beck is not a Christian: http://carm.org/glenn-beck-christian

“By so doing, we can conclude that if Glenn Beck affirms the official teaching of Mormonism, then he is not a Christian. This is because Mormonism not only denies essential doctrines of the Christian faith, it reinterprets the Christian faith into something entirely new and foreign to Scripture.”

And there are a few conservatives, as well as any sane Independent or Democrat who would agree with Bill Kristol that Beck “brings to mind no one so much as Robert Welch and the John Birch Society.” Hardly an affirmation that Beck is a patriot either.

Oh well, one out of three ain’t bad…

Like I said before, if Sheen goes to rehab and cleans up his life, he can become sober, but Beck will still be a nut job.

Having said that, I vote for Beck’s show as being a much better comedy than 2 1/2 Men!

It’s a shame that Mediaite joined in the Charlie Sheen extravaganza which has to be one of the dumber non-events of recent memory. One just has to feel sorry for this poor fellow cracking up in public. As for Stern – he’s no bargain but at least he’s harmless. Beck is a different matter. One could say that he’s just a poor schmuck who’s been seriously damaged by drugs and especially alcohol, but that doesn’t do him justice. More to blame are Murdoch and Ailes who have inflicted him on the American public. I’m sure you’ll all be hearing what is one of the bigger media stories just developing. The Canadian Government regulators are refusing to give permission for Fox News to broadcast in Canada. Those poor Canadians – first it’s this stupid national health care that they’ve forced on their citizens and now it’s this censorship of Fox News. The reason the Canadian Government is giving is that they don’t want a news organization that tells too many lies and distortions. It’’s not so good for the social fabric or some such abstract concept. I’m waiting for the Canadians to come rushing across the border to watch their Fox and Beck as well as swamp our medical system. The Canadian story is below.

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/276-74/5123-fox-news-lies-keep-them-out-of-canada

ganymede said:
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/276-74/5123-fox-news-lies-keep-them-out-of-canada

Amazing. Who would ever think about having a law that forbids lying on broadcast news? On the other hand, who would ever imagine that a major channel’s news broadcasts would be so driven to spread as much false information as Fox?

I remember the height of the Mark Foley page scandal, the caption under his picture was Rep. Mark Foley (D)

roman1654 said:
Howie must not be doing as well as his paycheck portrays.
Why else would he be doing as many interviews on these “talk” show?
The truly crazy person is one who takes any of the talk show hosts seriously and actually signs their paychecks.

simple, it is called promoting

Howard Stern has the intellect of a snail. His loud mouth covers for his low intellect. i.e., If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS.

ganymede said:
The Canadian Government regulators are refusing to give permission for Fox News to broadcast in Canada. Those poor Canadians – first it’s this stupid national health care that they’ve forced on their citizens and now it’s this censorship of Fox News. The reason the Canadian Government is giving is that they don’t want a news organization that tells too many lies and distortions.

Say, isn’t the government of Canada the kind of government the anti-American Left wants for the US? The kind that can’t furnish examples of “lies” it accuses FOX of telling? That kind?

I sure seems like a good thing to have a government censoring news broadcasts so that only APPROVED information is made available. I wonder where they got such a good idea. It must work well in countries like China and No. Korea where they currently use that kind of information control, as well as in the FORMER Soviet Union.

Yeah. that sounds like just the thing that fits the Liberal anti-American mission. And they’re counting on all DIMS to help them achieve that kind of “liberty.”

BruinAlum77 said:
I remember the height of the Mark Foley page scandal, the caption under his picture was Rep. Mark Foley (D)

Yes, shocking!

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2011/02/28/nbc-mislabels-dem-mayor-r-after-providence-fires-all-its-school-teach

Howard Stern has long past his due date of humor and significance. Sell-Out all the way. Now, Howard; please go away – Mr. self-proclaimed ‘King of all media’.

Poor Howard, he’s become so insignificant he’s now resorting to the Mahar, and Maddow of gutter media to try and reclaime some of the parade that has passed him by.

I think Charlie Sheen might be a little more stable then Glenn. Glenn even though claims he was a drunk and did some drugs, he didn’t come close to doing as much as Charlie. I think Charlie is stabelizing out faster then the Beckster.

Glenn Beck is not insane, and he’s not “crazy.” He knows exactly what he’s doing: manipulating the gullible sheeple who swallow his horse manure.
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2011/02/why-glenn-beck-isnt-crazy-and-millions.html

Beck poses a threat to the American experiment in democratic order:
http://www.sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.com/2011/03/glenn-beck-poses-threat-to-american.html