‘Sharpiegate’ a Nothingburger: Arizona Attorney General ‘Confident’ That Use Of Markers Did Not Disenfranchise Voters

 
Arizona Trump protests

Photo credit: Courtney Pedroza, Getty Images

Supporters of President Donald Trump have been pushing a conspiracy theory claiming that Maricopa County, AZ election officials had Republican voters use Sharpie markers on their ballots in order to invalidate their votes, and the state’s attorney general has now investigated and found that claim to be totally baseless.

Accusations have been flying on social media with claims that the Sharpies made the ballots unreadable or otherwise prevented votes for Trump for being counted on a large scale. Conservative activists and media figures amplified the outrage, including Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo, who tweeted the conspiracy theory many referred to as “Sharpiegate” along with several other debunked claims.

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs weighed in on the issue earlier Thursday, telling CNN’s Wolf Blitzer there was “no concern about ballots being counted because of the pen that was used to mark the ballots.”

“All of those ballots are being counted and even if the machines can’t read them for some reason, a marker bled through to the other side, we have ways to count them,” Hobbs continued. “They are going to be counted. There is absolutely no merit to saying that this was some conspiracy to invalidate Republican ballots. There is no there there at all.”

Concerned Arizonans nonetheless made complaints to Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who investigated the issue. Thursday evening, Brnovich tweeted a copy of the letter he sent to local Maricopa County officials, saying that his office “was now confident that the use of Sharpie markers did not result in disenfranchisement for Arizona voters.”

As Brnovich’s letter noted, he had requested information from the county election officials and took seriously complaints his office had received from Arizona voters. Regarding the issue of Sharpie markers, wrote Brnovich, his office now considered the issue “to be concluded at this time.”

Tags:

Sarah Rumpf joined Mediaite in 2020 and is a Contributing Editor focusing on politics, law, and the media. A native Floridian, Sarah attended the University of Florida, graduating with a double major in Political Science and German, and earned her Juris Doctor, cum laude, from the UF College of Law. Sarah's writing has been featured at National Review, The Daily Beast, Reason, Law&Crime, Independent Journal Review, Texas Monthly, The Capitolist, Breitbart Texas, Townhall, RedState, The Orlando Sentinel, and the Austin-American Statesman, and her political commentary has led to appearances on television, radio, and podcast programs across the globe. Follow Sarah on Threads, Twitter, and Bluesky.