What I also found somewhat interesting is that the guest which followed this segment, Fmr. Ambassador Richard Burt, who is currently with Global Zero had his organization’s logo projected onto the backdrop during the interview and it too had a circular thing.

Stewart provides a wonderful example of the simplemindedness of FNC and Fox and Friends, in particular. Hard to believe there is a huge viewership of morons who believe this stuff and eat it up ala Thanksgiving dinner.

Great comment Trickletown. You the man.
Most people don’t have the courage to show a real & current photograph of themselves.

So, wait, this means Fox News hates the Jews, right? Those bastards!

Brilliant, as usual. :-)

Jon Stewart does it again!

Fox presents the traitors, who would not accept the outcome of the democratic process, having lost decisively to a black man with an Islamic name, in a fair election. Now they betray their country for politics, as sore losers, and betrayers of the democratic process created by our forefathers. Denying democracy, they attack the duly elected president, lending support to our enemies, and siding with the tyrants in hatred of Obama. They cheer against Obama, whatever he does, whatever he says, whatever decision he makes, even on matters that have important baring on our country’s security. Can these not be but the wishes of tratiors? Whether we like it or not, the President is our country’s face, and it is important that that face be respected and supported. We voted for Obama. He won. Not stop demeaning the President of the United States.

Lebowitz=comedy channel….Nuff said.

Buy full line Juicy couture products from our site at a low price to make yourself a fashionista! Dress juicy couture clothing, holding juicy couture
Shop prom dresses, formal dresses, prom shoes, 2010 designer prom gowns at dres4sale.
for cocktail dresses, dresses for prom, homecoming dresses, and evening dresses. Cheap prom dresses or couture designer evening gowns for your next formal.
evening dresses
Evening Dresses. Women’s Formal & Special Occasion Dresses … Welcome to Cheap Evening Dresses for Sale! … Buy Cheap Evening Dresses Sales & Accessories
prom dresses

Fox News is a complete joke. It’s sad that they’ve got dedicated viewers.

Fox News = comedy channel… Nuff said.

I think Stewart should be nominated for the Kennedy Center Awards. He is a national treasure.

I think the Gretch, Douchey and Kilmeade should broadcast remotely, from Enid, Oklahoma, for six (6) weeks.

Its not patriotic, at all, not withstanding all the flags. It is where the scoundrel hides, pretending to love their country, they vitriol against its duly elected President, while claiming to be patriotic as they deny the will of the electorate in a fair election. It is not the job of the opposing party to attack the President, and it is the opposing party that has, within its control, the power to unite or disunite the country. Usually in time of war the President is supported.

fox is teh stupid

Trickletown, you need to slip into something more comfortable, like a coma, libby.

Knuckle-dragging miscreants like you are a dime a dozen. Go back and get your pathetic talking points form the 4th rated cable network MSNBC.

Big_F-ing_Deal says:
April 15, 2010 at 1:08 pm

fox is “teh” stupid”

No comment needed.

The Real Royal King says:
April 15, 2010 at 1:02 pm

I think Stewart should be nominated for the Kennedy Center Awards. He is a national treasure.”

And he should be buried.

I, for one, always enjoy Trickletown’s posts, although I have been at the receiving end of his comments at times. He is immensely witty and targets without ideological discrimination.

Remember when everyone worried that Obama’s election would result in the dismal end of The Daily Show? Ha.

No… but I remember when it was predicted FNC would fall (if a Republican OR Democrat was elected), and that MSNBC would surge with Obama’s election.

“Ha,” indeed.

valkyrie101 says:
April 15, 2010 at 12:35 pm

Man, val… I just can’t get a read on you. Sometimes you’re thoughtful and well reasoned… and then sometimes, like this comment, you’re bat-sh!t crazy!

Apparently, you think that criticizing the President is un-American… apparently, “freedom of speech” doesn’t include comments directed at this particular White House. Wow. Talk about being a “traitor” to one’s own country… denying basic rights for ALL citizens, I guess that puts you front and center in that category.

valkyrie101 says:
April 15, 2010 at 1:04 pm

Usually in time of war the President is supported.

I can only assume by this statement, that you’re 2 years old… because if you were any older, you’d remember at least a little from the past 8 years. And then, I’d think, you’d feel some shame or embarrassment having had said something so obviously denying of history.

I can only assume by this statement, that you’re 2 years old”

val tries to appear as a disinterested poster but he is a total libby shill and apologist.

Here are the facts, blue, when Bush wanted to go to war, 29 Democratic Senators voted for the war resolution in support of the President. 82 Democratic members of the House voted in support of the President. That is a far cry from what the Republicans are doing, with a stated goal to oppose every single piece of legislation, including threatened filibusters of appointments. And the Republicans are voting in a block against the President. Zero support for the President, that is their proud motto. They hurt the country by doing that.

That’s because you’re not paying attention, ImNot. It wasn’t on Fox News, so I’m sure that’s why you missed it.

http://celebrifi.com/gossip/Can-The-Daily-Show-Survive-the-Barack-Obama-Presidency-279268.html

“Ha.”

The National Socialist German Workers’ Party aka The Nazi Party.

What part of Socialism do you on the left not understand? Oh ya – The Nazi Part

Democrat’s want Big Government.:

Castro = Big Government
Chavez = Big Government
Mao = Big Government
Saddam Hussein = Big Government
Hitler = Big Government

You can keep your Big Governemt – I will choose Freedom – You can’t have both

valkyrie101 says:
April 15, 2010 at 1:44 pm

That’s right, I forgot that political decency over the past 8 years was defined by a few months. Riiiight.

Man, I really thought you were better than that. Apparently, Jack Murtha saying that soldiers were killing civilians in the dead of night, wasn’t speaking against the country, and helping out the war effort. Apparently, Senators calling the President a “loser” was also good. Apparently, Sen. Obama voting against Supreme Court picks, not for any legal reason… but because he didn’t think he liked the “character of his heart,” wasn’t obstructionism.

Your history is flawed. You’re not remembering things… and you’re being dishonest.

tjl says:
April 15, 2010 at 1:46 pm

Yeah, forgive me for not reading all the gossip sites, and not taking them seriously. Yeesh.

Yet again Tyler failed to address the reality of facts at hand, instead his desire is to denigrate MSNBC! Bravo!

Toshiba2 , you loser. How does it feel to be named after a TV?

I lived through the cold war and bomb shelter raids in my grade school. The world is a far safer place now than then. Not even close. But the conservatives are scared anyway. A oommunist under every bush, and so scared that Hitler is marching in their dreams. A peaceful world is in reach, and Obama is the man to broker it. He is uniquely qualified to do that. Stop attacking the Presidency, it is anti-American, and way over the top of fair criticism.

Bravo, Tyler, Bravo!

29 Democratic Senators voted for the war resolution in support of the President. ”

The Repubs HAVE supported BHO’s Afgan policy. To compare the support of a war issue with support for domestic legislation is pure sophistry.

Toshiba2 says:
April 15, 2010 at 2:09 pm

Bravo, Tyler, Bravo!”

Sorry, BRAVO is a SONY brand.

The world is a far safer place now than then.”

Not so. We now spend more money than every for public safety due to the the changing threat: terrorism.

No tyler, we are at war. During such times, supporting the office of the Presidency is considered appropriate, especially with regard to foreign policy. Imagine Sarah Palin with her “community organizer” comment. She should be ashamed of herself. That is an insult to the office of the Presidency during a time of war. She claims to love America, as she sides with our enemies. The Dems offered Bush support when he asked for it, when he needed it most. The Republicans have a short memory, as they attempt to stymie the constitutionally elected President, and are proud of it, during war. Sad,.

“community organizer” comment”

Was BHO a community organizer?

Yes or no?

Support during war like this?

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2010/03/025964.php

She claims to love America, as she sides with our enemies.”

name them Oh, you mean like Israel?

The Dems offered Bush support ”

harry Reid: “The war is lost.”

Al Gore: “He lied to us. He betrayed our country!”

Support like that, Val? Really?

“”We should stop the surge and start bringing our troops home,” said senior Democratic Senator Joseph Biden.

Carl Levin, another veteran Democrat, said claims the surge was working was part of a “litany of delusion” by the Bush administration on Iraq.

Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton said the reports by Petraeus and US ambassador to Baghdad Ryan Crocker demanded the “willing suspension of disbelief.”

val, why are trying to compare going to war with ramming a bogus healthcare “reform” bill through? I would say that’s apples and oranges, but, it’s more like grasping at non-existent straws.

You know the world is a “safer place” when the potus attends a nuclear summit and north korea is NEVER brought up! Iran will have nuke capabilities in no time at all….. Tell us another one, val!

Val, which of our enemies is SP supporting? BHO is the one who will not impose sanctions on Iran or NKorea.

It’s BHO, the community organizer, who would rather have an agreement with Russia than a victory. It’s BHO’s admin, which asks, “Why do we have to be number 1 all the time?” It’s BHO whose lamentation is , “We are a super -power, FOR BETTER OR WORSE.”

Tyler,
All I know is, attacking the President, and claiming that he is not a legitimate President and should not be respected, that stuff hurts our nation, and compromises before our enemies our national stature, not just Obama’s. So the tea party is a movement of many different kinds of people, but among them are those who would rather see Obama fail than our nation win.

Tyler, you are stuck with our democratically elected President. The election decided that. Now it is time to support the office of the President, pursuant to the values of our Constitution.

valkyrie101 says:
April 15, 2010 at 2:08 pm

I lived through the cold war and bomb shelter raids in my grade school. The world is a far safer place now than then. Not even close. But the conservatives are scared anyway.

Yeah, who thought a rogue nation trying to get a nuclear bomb would upset them so much?

A oommunist under every bush, and so scared that Hitler is marching in their dreams.

Anti-Semite?

A peaceful world is in reach, and Obama is the man to broker it. He is uniquely qualified to do that.

Uniquely qualified because of what, exactly? On his resume of achievements, which experiences point to him declaring world peace is? And exactly what evidence do you have for this statement at all?

Stop attacking the Presidency, it is anti-American, and way over the top of fair criticism.

Can you explain to me when you stopped believing in the Constitution? When did free speech become too inconvenient for you to support?

valkyrie101 says:
April 15, 2010 at 2:18 pm

The Dems offered Bush support when he asked for it, when he needed it most. The Republicans have a short memory, as they attempt to stymie the constitutionally elected President, and are proud of it, during war. Sad,

Yeah… good thing none of this happened:
http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621

Apparently, you remember a month of the previous 8 years… then ignore or have “forgotten” the rest. I’d suggest you put down the bong, but at this point… it might be too late.

Oh, and since I’ve already pointed all this stuff out… and you’re just ignoring it, I’ll assume you’re just going for the “annoyance” factor, and know that you’re a liar.

valkyrie101 says:
April 15, 2010 at 2:52 pm

Tyler, you are stuck with our democratically elected President. The election decided that. Now it is time to support the office of the President, pursuant to the values of our Constitution.

Oooh, a hypocrite too. I guess all those protests against Bush, people attacking him in print, public, television, etc. all that never happened. Either that, or you just don’t care.

What happened, val? Are you actually multiple people typing under one name? Because this stuff is very different than yesterday’s posts. Right now, you’re pretty crazy… yesterday, you were more sane. What’s happening buddy?

Maybe val, is actually JohnT? Both seem to ignore things that don’t agree with what they’ve already said… even when confronted with evidence to the contrary. They’ll just run away, I guess. Pathetic.

INB: You are always the drama queen, particularly when it comes to defending W. Whatever. Man love can be very strong. I would, however, remind you that you are comparing a truly democratically elected president in his first term to one who did not receive a majority of votes and won only by the quaint non-democratic process called the Electoral College, and, even the, only because of the highly irregular, improper and aggressive intervention of the Supreme Court. You are comparing an emerald to a cod fish.

Umm, ” your very highness…

I’m sorry to bother you but…if you’ll forgive my intrusion…with all due respect, of course…

WHAT THE HECK DOES…
“…Electoral College, and, even the, only because of the highly irregular, improper and aggressive intervention of the Supreme Court.”
MEAN…?

How are we all supposed to learn if you just write away and…well…it’s kind of a mess, sire.
(What would Jeff think..?)

Not to question your reign here or interject haphazardly but…”,and, even the, only because…” does not much sense make in Serf Village.

Did you perhaps mean “but, although, because, and another thing! that’s why…” ?

My hunch is that even your jester, “Tinkletown” is among the confused.

The Real Royal King says:
April 15, 2010 at 4:11 pm

I had no idea that you were an “election-stealer” believer! Neat!

Are you a Truther, too?

Of course, Bush won election twice… and every study has shown that time and time again. But I guess, it’s easier to make stuff up, than deal with reality and be consistent. But, I guess like Val, you’re cool with being a hypocrite, and making up your own history (despite evidence to the contrary), and getting annoyed when others (like me) don’t subscribe to your warped memory

Oh well.

Blue,
>>I lived through the cold war and bomb shelter raids in my grade school. The world is a far safer place now than then. Not even close. But the conservatives are scared anyway.

>Yeah, who thought a rogue nation trying to get a nuclear bomb would upset them so much?

Again, the world was much scarier during the cold war. The fear of a weapon in the hands of a terrorist has been with us the entire time, nothing new.

>>A oommunist under every bush, and so scared that Hitler is marching in their dreams.

>Anti-Semite?

No, you are the one comparing “big government” to Hitler. You must be really afraid if you are imagining that Obama is leading us there.

>>A peaceful world is in reach, and Obama is the man to broker it. He is uniquely qualified to do that.

>Uniquely qualified because of what, exactly? On his resume of achievements, which experiences point to him declaring world peace is? And exactly what evidence do you have for this statement at all?

My evidence is belief in the American people, who elected him. Obama proved himself during the election process, his ability to think, speak, and lead. That is why we chose him over someone so excellent as Senator McCain.

>>Stop attacking the Presidency, it is anti-American, and way over the top of fair criticism.

>Can you explain to me when you stopped believing in the Constitution? When did free speech become too inconvenient for you to support?

Of course Republicans have the right to say anything they want. But that is different than not supporting the President as a matter of policy. Of course that is also their right, but it does not mean that by doing that so extremely they support the interests of the nation as a whole.

>>The Dems offered Bush support when he asked for it, when he needed it most. The Republicans have a short memory, as they attempt to stymie the constitutionally elected President, and are proud of it, during war. Sad,

>Apparently, you remember a month of the previous 8 years… then ignore or have “forgotten” the rest. I’d suggest you put down the bong, but at this point… it might be too late.

Look at the voting statistics relating to Bush foreign policy matters, the Dems substantially supported him, as I pointed out. 29 out of 50 Dem Senators voted to support Bush’s war resolution. Had the Republicans been wearing that shoe, they would have voted as a block against him, as they have done since he was elected on virtually all matters.

>Oh, and since I’ve already pointed all this stuff out… and you’re just ignoring it, I’ll assume you’re just going for the “annoyance” factor, and know that you’re a liar.

I would never ignore you Blue. :-)

>>Tyler, you are stuck with our democratically elected President. The election decided that. Now it is time to support the office of the President, pursuant to the values of our Constitution.

>Oooh, a hypocrite too. I guess all those protests against Bush, people attacking him in print, public, television, etc. all that never happened. Either that, or you just don’t care.

Sure, blue, there was nasty protests by some people on the left, but our representatives, our political representatives, not our fringe, did not oppose Bush as a block. We supported his foreign policy. We respected Powell, Bush’s Secretary of State. Opposition to the war did not start coming down until after we were there for several years.

>What happened, val? Are you actually multiple people typing under one name? Because this stuff is very different than yesterday’s posts. Right now, you’re pretty crazy… yesterday, you were more sane. What’s happening buddy?

In what way are they different? I support Bush, voted for him. He lost me when he and Cheney started justifiying torture. Overall, I admire his Presidency, I think he did a good job. He certainly did his best. He cared. I don’t blame him. Does that mean we should do things the same way? No. We have a new president, now that we elected, and he will do things according to the platform of the Party that elected him. That is how democracy works.

ImNotBlue , TRRK is a truther, and a “GB stole the election.

He is complete childish liberal with no soul.

All I know is, attacking the President, and claiming that he is not a legitimate President and should not be respected”

SP said that?

Where?

valkyrie101 says:
April 15, 2010 at 5:13 pm

Again, the world was much scarier during the cold war. The fear of a weapon in the hands of a terrorist has been with us the entire time, nothing new.

Well, what kept the cold war a stalemate was the whole mutual destruction theory… however, as I’ve discussed, that doesn’t come into play here. We’re talking about a lot of people who are willing to blow themselves up to hurt their “enemy.” Mutual destruction is nothing new… and for a long time, it was the proffered way of attacking! That’s why this situation is potentially more dangerous.

No, you are the one comparing “big government” to Hitler.

I am? Exactly where or when did I say anything even close to that?

My evidence is belief in the American people, who elected him. Obama proved himself during the election process, his ability to think, speak, and lead.

And don’t his relatively few accomplishments, protests against his programs, and continually falling approval numbers refute that? Yeah… he can speak… but apparently, the people aren’t exactly buying it in droves.

Of course Republicans have the right to say anything they want.

Okay, we’re making progress… although, I suspect you still think it’s “un-American” of them… since that’s what you’ve said.

But that is different than not supporting the President as a matter of policy. Of course that is also their right, but it does not mean that by doing that so extremely they support the interests of the nation as a whole.

Well, as a policy it ISN’T… that’s a myth. The fact is, the Republicans are willing to work with the President… but “working with,” and “going along with everything he says for the sake of going along,” isn’t the same. They disagree on key issues… and as long as Obama pushes those issues, why should or would the Republicans go along with it?

Look at the voting statistics relating to Bush foreign policy matters, the Dems substantially supported him, as I pointed out. 29 out of 50 Dem Senators voted to support Bush’s war resolution.

And this is where you get really dishonest… again. There was more than just those few months! Wake. Up.

Throughout his Presidency, he was attacking, ridiculed, insults, and so on. We’ve provided the links, we’ve spoke of the events… but you’re still stuck on one event early in Bush’s Presidency. I’m happy to keep debating you, but if you’re going to purposely re-write history to distort the facts, I’m not going to waste my time. The Democrats turned very quickly against Bush, and history reflects that.

I would never ignore you Blue. :-)

So I was right? You intentions are simply to annoy, and you recognize that you’re lying?

Hmm… I guess admitting it is a start.

Sure, blue, there was nasty protests by some people on the left, but our representatives, our political representatives, not our fringe, did not oppose Bush as a block.

Really? So when Harry Reid called Bush a “Loser,” he wasn’t a Senator? Your re-write of history is simply amazing, but so blatantly untrue, it borders on insanity. As a party, they insulted Republicans and the President at any opportunity. That’s why when folks like Alan Grayson say loony things like, “Republicans want people to die quickly,” he becomes the darling of the party, not an outcast. This isn’t anything new… and your attempts to pretend it didn’t happen are transparent.

In what way are they different?

You’re purposely distorting facts, and using small windows of time as some sort of bizarre bit of evidence. You know what you’re saying is false, but are keeping on keeping on. I was unaware you were just another hater, who’ll do whatever it takes (including blatantly lying) if you think it will assist your argument.

To “valkyrie101,”

“…We have a new president, now that we elected, and he will do things according to the platform of the Party that elected him. That is how democracy works.”

Actually, I don’t believe the Democrat party platform involved:

-continuing the Iraq war

-stepping up the Afghanistan war

(and winning the Nobel Peace Prize to boot!)

-sticking health care way, way up into the collective consciousness (and then some)

-hiring so many Goldman Sachs guys to help run the government (okay, maybe…)

-”spending our way out of the recession” (okay, maybe pt. II)

Well…maybe it’s their platform now.

Bizarre piece of evidence? That is the definitive evidence. You can not write it off. Not all the Democrats who voted for war were personally in favor of it, but,, like Hillary Clinton, they offered themselves to the good judgment of the President, in faith. That is also the job of the minority party, to offer themselves, not all, to support the Office of the President. This game the Republicans are playing is unprecedented. Its not patriotic, because, obviously, the nation comes first. We do not support our enemies cause by undermining the authority of our nations’ chief spokesperson, and chief executive officer. Does that render our nation compromised in the eyes of our enemies and partners? Yes, I think it does. Isn’t that the argument that Nixon made against too much anti-war protest, that such criticism compromised national security? Republicans may not now argue that it is otherwise.

The ironic thing about Obama’s nuke policy, treaty, conference, the Nobel people will be looking for someone to credit for all that. Hey, how many times can you win the Nobel Peace Prize. :-) At least we know he will not take the money.

valkyrie101 says:
April 15, 2010 at 6:43 pm

So Democratic support for Bush, no matter how fleeting, is enough to cover 6-7 years of everything else?

So when Jack Murtha slandered the troops (is statement was shown to be false), that’s irrelevant or unworthy evidence to you, and a sign that the Democrats (remember, he was pretty powerful in the party) weren’t rooting for Bush’s (and America’s) failure?

Wow.

Blue,
There is no comparison between the support given to Bush by Democrats and what the Republicans have done with Obama. You can always point out some opposition, in fact some opposition is important. I do not suggest that Republicans not oppose, to some extent, but the Republicans have gone beyond that. They have decided, as a group, across the board, to oppose the President, in order to, as they have said, to sink Obama’s Presidency. By sinking Obama’s Presidency, they hope that America sinks.

This from a guy who won’t question how ANTI-SEMITIC Barack Obama’s own church and minister was.

He won’t question how Obama’s “Uncle Jermiah” said that the Jews are controlling Barack.

He won’t question why the U.S. is now treating Israel like a pariah.

He won’t question why Obama hung around Hamas/PLO terrorist supporters while in Chicago.

When he does that…oh wait he won’t and didn’t.

“they have said, to sink Obama’s Presidency”

No valkyrie101 they said they wanted Obama’s U.S. destroying policies to fail.

Jon Stewart , (John Stuart Leibowitz) is just a funny guy . . . . he thinks. He’s no more no less than Bill Maher. Why the angst?