»» Columnists

Keith Olbermann, Please Accept John Ziegler’s Palin Debate Challenge


plea

zig-worstToday is the first day of the rest of Going Rogue’s life, and the beginning of what is sure to be a media avalanche of fact-checking, mock-checking, charges, and counter-charges. If the media is true to form, the result will be more food for the Palin media martyr machine, and more bleed-through of silliness like the “Death Panel.”

Not long ago, on these very pages, John Ziegler prescribed the antidote to this circus: a live debate with Countdown’s Keith Olbermann. Today, I say “Help us, Olby Wan KeithOlby, you’re our only hope!”

This is an opportunity to cut away all of the distractions and get right to the heart of the matter. Sure, the press has been unfair to Palin at times, but they were unfair to Mario Mendoza, too. That didn’t change the fact that he was a .215 hitter. A debate with Ziegler could settle the score once and for all, and would be the next best thing to debating Palin herself. From what I’ve read, Palin’s ghostwriter leaned heavily on the copy of Ziegler’s movie that was given to him at the start of the project.

Here, then, are my reasons why Keith Olbermann should, nay must, accept Ziegler’s challenge today.

Like Him or Not, He Puts on a Helluva Show

You can apply that statement to both Ziegler and Olbermann. While Ziegler’s “Media Malpractice” film won’t win any awards for objectivity, it’s undeniably entertaining. Conservatives will cheer through it, liberals will hiss, but nobody’s going to cop any z’s during it.

As for Keith, his show sets the bar for propulsive political entertainment. It’s a handy one-stop shop for the pulse of the American center-left, made digestible with a sleek format and regular sprinklings of pop-culture sugar to offset the political salt.

Put Ziegler’s sharp, energetic, Barnum-esque interview style together with Keith’s penchant for quick-witted, often passionate rhetoric, and you’ve got a recipe for television magic.

He’s Asking For it

Keith, have you read John Ziegler’s review of Going Rogue? I think he put this line in there just for you:

For many reasons, this is by far the best book and greatest literary achievement by a political figure in my lifetime.

Actually, he pretty much cops to it, saying he’s going “out on the type of limb that will make MSNBC hosts salivate.” That’s like a double-dare.

You’re The Place For Politics

Much of the sound and fury surrounding Palin has to do with personal intrigue and insults to the former Alaska governor. The one time the media had a crack at Palin on policy (the infamous “Death Panels”), they failed miserably. That includes your pal, Eugene Robinson.

This is your chance to focus, like a laser, on Palin’s political weaknesses, some of which she brags about. You think she can’t convince people that quitting her job as Alaska governor is a sign of strong leadership? I thought that move would finish her off. I talked to Ziegler that day, and he offered to bet me it wouldn’t. I’m glad I didn’t make that bet. Which leads me to my next point.

She Could Win

I’ve said all along that the best thing liberals can do about Palin is get out of her way, let her win the 2012 GOP nomination, and watch Barack Obama mop the floor with her. I’m not so sure about that anymore. With our microscopic news cycle getting ever-smaller, political memory is short. While 71% of Americans now feel that she is unqualified for the job, it is important to remember that Barack Obama faced a similar knock right up until he won the election. Ironically, like Obama, Palin is a political anomaly (of a different sort). It’s tough to predict how the ball is going to bounce.

One thing is for sure, with the Republicans lacking anything resembling a superstar for 2012, Palin is the name to beat in the GOP. A few bad hops, and we could be covering President Palin’s War on MSNBC. That’s why it is important to challenge Going Rogue on the politics, not the “he said/she said” that’s getting all the play now.

Ziegler Has Genuine Insight into Palin

While you may disagree with his conclusions, John Ziegler has a unique perspective on Palin. He genuinely admires her, but more than that, he understands her humanity in ways that her most ardent fans don’t. After her resignation, he predicted much of the arc of her return to prominence. He understands what people like about her.

You Kinda Owe Him

Aside from the fact that you misspelled his name when you awarded him 3rd Worst back in March, you have to admit it was kind of a low blow to accuse him of acting on a “crush” on Palin.

$100,000 to Charity

That’s nothing to sneeze at. Think of all the free health clinics that would pay for. Plus, you surely must appreciate Ziegler’s moxie in pulling the same charity shaming trick that you used on Palin during the campaign.

Palin is Traffic Gold

A show like this would do huge numbers, and the clips would be viral marketing gold.

So please, consider this proposal. It’s your best, most well-timed chance to make your point. I’ll even buy the popcorn.*

*I won’t really buy the popcorn.

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


8 comments

  • TfT TfT says:

    I don’t think you need to worry about buying the popcorn, it’ll never happen. Olberman doesn’t allow opposing voices on his show, you are with him or you are not on the air with him.

  • MartiniShark MartiniShark says:

    I know it was written in jest, but think how bad things are if Olberman is your only hope. To have Olberman fact-checking is itself a laughable premise. This is the same Olberman who toddles around claiming to have matriculated from The Ivy League when he is in fact a communications major from Cornell’s agricultural school. (I mean if he cannot get his own backstory correct how viable is his research on others?) As you pointed out, they could not even get a name spelled correctly on his show.

    There is a reason K.O. would never debate Palin – he would whither. Unlike his usual targets, O’reilly and Hannity, who have sat across from opponents like Al Franken and Michael Moore, Keith would not hold up. And as you point out it would do huge numbers – his show needs that, yet he would never. And your assessment of him being a center-left commentator is mirthful. He is so far removed from center if Keith were a quarterback he would line up behind his tight end.

  • Texas Texas says:

    Keith Olbermann? Is this the same guy whose claim to fame at Cornell Ag was being the best ball washer at the golf course? Communications Major at an Ag school? Is that a BA Cow Whisperer?

    The guy has a total lack of knowledge, class and a very limited vocabulary.

    MSNBC is a good place for this talentless hack.

  • Hey Texas, that couldn’t have been Olbermann at Cornell because he doesn’t have any balls.

  • Pat Doherty Pat Doherty says:

    I wonder what color the sky is in Mr. Christopher’s world. Olbermann doesn’t debate anybody, period. Let’s not forget last summer’s respective political conventions, where despite his role as anchor he became palpably unhinged at the slightest GOP talking point, even those uttered by MSNBC colleagues (cf. “Jesus Christ Joe, why don’t you get a shovel,” and “CUT HIM OFF!”). A more interesting article by Mr. Christopher would have dealt with a speculative over/under on when Olbermann would melt down when forced to confront someone with opinions different from his own.

    P.S. To the best of my knowledge, Olbermann has also ignored debate requests from Betsy McCaughey and Michael Medved after attempting to smear both of them.

  • Magister Magister says:

    I realize this post is just bait to provoke the Olbermann-haters and politically, I’m not a fan of Sarah Palin, but though the media knocks on her resignation are starting to show traction, they are kind of off-base.

    I mean, how could anyone run for President, if they’re almost 1500 miles northwest of Seattle – closer to Moscow than New York?

  • MikeLI631 MikeLI631 says:

    Herr Obermann, is a pilot-fish, of what used to be called, “respectable journalism”.

    The Morton Downey Jr., of his Age.

  • jimmymaher jimmymaher says:

    If I had a choice between Sara Palin or mr. obama, She wins, hands down. But, we are stuck with a Hitler wanna-be for now. Olbermann must have the ” tingle” for obama. Good luck with the debate, but I don’t think he’ll accept. His charity is himself. I hear he has enrolled in the obama school of lies. It’s another part of Acorn, and it’s free for idiots.
    Vitamin C

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    The Seven Best (Or, Somewhat Memorable) Moments Of The Jay Leno Show

    video

    After 95 episodes, the epic failure known as The Jay Leno Show airs its final episode tonight. Of course, Leno himself will be back after the Olympics, comfortably at 11:35pm all over again. Which was pretty much the problem to begin with - the 10pm offering started as a similar product to the Tonight Show, and only became more like the old format as time went on.

    No Surprise Here: FNC Dominates Ratings For Palin Tea Party Speech

    ratings

    • With all three cable news networks carrying Sarah Palin's tea party speech and Q&A after on Saturday night, Fox News was the clear winner in the ratings. During the 9pmET hour, FNC had more viewers in the A25-54 demographic than MSNBC, CNN and HLN combined. In total viewers, Fox News had more than double the combined total of the other three cablers.



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS