Monica Lewinsky: President Clinton “Answered Untruthfully”


lewinskyPolitico is reporting that a new book to be published next February includes assertions from Monica Lewinsky that Bill Clinton “answered untruthfully” in testimony. Death of American Virtue, written by Ken Gormley “offers an insightful, balanced, and revealing analysis of the events leading up to the impeachment trial of President William Jefferson Clinton,” says the Random House website.

Writing for Politico, Josh Gerstein and John F. Harris call this “the first definitive history of the Clinton scandal” and are quick to point out that neither Clinton nor Kenneth Starr will be pleased with their portrayal in the book.

The biggest news to come from the pages of this book appear to be Monica Lewinsky’s assertion that former President Clinton was not telling the truth under oath. Gerstein and Harris write:

— Lewinsky now believes Bill Clinton lied about their relationship during his grand jury testimony. “There was no leeway [there] on the veracity of his statements because they asked him detailed and specific questions to which he answered untruthfully,” she wrote to Gormley earlier this year. Longtime Clinton attorney David Kendall declined to comment.

The Random House website about the book includes the following:

Ten years after one of the most polarizing political scandals in American history, author Ken Gormley offers an insightful, balanced, and revealing analysis of the events leading up to the impeachment trial of President William Jefferson Clinton. From Ken Starr’s initial Whitewater investigation through the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit to the Monica Lewinsky affair, The Death of American Virtue is a gripping chronicle of an ever-escalating political feeding frenzy.

In exclusive interviews, Bill Clinton, Ken Starr, Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, Susan McDougal, and many more key players offer candid reflections on that period. Drawing on never-before-released records and documents—including the Justice Department’s internal investigation into Starr, new details concerning the death of Vince Foster, and evidence from lawyers on both sides—Gormley sheds new light on a dark and divisive chapter, the aftereffects of which are still being felt in today’s political climate.

Whether or not our country is eager to relive that “dark and divisive chapter” is a debate for another day. And will likely BE the debate as we ring in the new year – as many political pundits will present the Clinton Scandal as the beginning of this current era of the bitter partisan politics.

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


9 comments

  • ImNotBlue ImNotBlue says:

    DUUUUUUUUH.

  • Chris Jones says:

    Clinton answered untruthfully? You don’t say.

  • TfT TfT says:

    Billy Jeff lie? Say it ain’t so.

  • Keeva Keeva says:

    Oh my goodness. What next? Dog bites man?

  • Shirley Mays Shirley Mays says:

    The public cannot possible understand the impact of this book. Just wait and see. From a Whistleblower who knows.

  • Magister Magister says:

    Though I don’t think this book will do better than a few library copies, those whose name is listed in the index and a historical record, but we’ve been led to believe that the prosecutors and President Clinton’s lawyers narrowly defined the terms and that he answered truthfully within their parameters. Miss Lewinsky wasn’t a party to these definitions, she was a target of the investigation and she didn’t have an advocate in the room — so what would her opinion about a legal position matter?

  • Nachi Nachi says:

    Dear sweet Monica. At Hanukka.

  • Jim R Jim R says:

    I hope the book details how Starr was hired after Robert Fisk said there was no there there.

    Two judges from the three-judge panel that continued the Clinton jihad had lunch with Jesse Helms and Lauch Faircloth of North Carolina, with an 84 million dollar vendetta the result.

    I also wonder if the book quotes what a Newt Gingrich bodyguard saw in the driveway as he walked Newt’s daughter home from school, while Gingrich was moralizing about Clinton every day.

    I’m totally surprised Republicans can even say sex scandal anymore without breaking out in laughter right in our faces.

  • ImNotBlue ImNotBlue says:

    Jim R says:
    December 18, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    He lied under oath. It doesn’t matter what he was talking about… he lied.

    Why do you think the President lying under oath is acceptable?

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    Glenn Beck Confirms That Your Rights Come From God

    your moment of glenn

    Last night we pointed out that Glenn Beck appeared to have a rather loose grip on the role of Congress when it came to the nation's unalienable rights. Tonight, Beck noted the hammering he had taken for his remarks and then took a moment to, um, clarify?

    Did Shep Smith Just Advocate The Changing Of Our Drug Laws?

    video

    Whenever the debate over Fox News' opinion versus news shows comes up, Shepard Smith is universally accepted as the paragon of capital-J Journalism at the cable news network. And we readily accept that -- we are big fans of Smith's homespun common sense and candid news delivery. So it was somewhat surprising to hear the Fox Newser make what seemed to be a potentially controversial remark about current drug laws when reporting a story about Mexican drug wars. Maybe Shep should have his own opinion show. I know I'd watch.



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | Dan Abrams, Founder | Hosting by Datagram | RSS