OMG that network needs to be shut down before CBC becomes as irrelevant as CNN.

Every good lookin’ chick you see on FOXN has a law degree…
It’s like the exact opposite of Rachel Maddow…

Well, duh! Murdoch has not beliefs or core values. Every network in Murdochia has a different political view.

skoorbekim said:
Every good lookin’ chick you see on FOXN has a law degree…
It’s like the exact opposite of Rachel Maddow…

You’re right. She doesn’t dress like a hooker, and her only degrees are from Stanford and Oxford (including a PhD from the latter).

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Well, duh! Murdoch has not beliefs or core values. Every network in Murdochia has a different political view.

no

skoorbekim said:
Every good lookin’ chick you see on FOXN has a law degree…It’s like the exact opposite of Rachel Maddow…

Excellent point, Roger Ailes seems to have a knack for finding really hot and intelligent ladies. That being said, How can I get this Sun News Channel? I could finally throw away my porn. Just kidding, my porn is here to stay.

MARK: Well, duh!! The operative word here is critics. When FNC first hit the scene, the elites at CNN & the legacy networks didn’t pay much attention to them. Now you’re using your college degrees to point out that CRITICS who don’t care for FNC in the U.S. are being critical of FOX in Canada.
Half of your article is irrelevant. The other half is obvious.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
You’re right. She doesn’t dress like a hooker, and her only degrees are from Stanford and Oxford (including a PhD from the latter).

What is her PhD in? Advanced Cunnilingus.

Eruptor75 said:
What is her PhD in? Advanced Cunnilingus.

Political Science, Slime Ball.

She went to Oxford on a Rhodes Scholarship.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Political Science, Slime Ball.

She went to Oxford on a Rhodes Scholarship.

LMAO!

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Political Science, Slime Ball. She went to Oxford on a Rhodes Scholarship.

Yes, I’m aware. Slime Ball? ouch Get a sense of humor. I’m sure she is an expert in both fields. I think you should change your handle to “The Royal Queen”. Because you are a woman.

The first shot across the bows of the new conservative network by liberal critics. Typical. Criticize the women, not the content of the network.

They really gonna hate them when their rating shoot upward now that Canadian viewers have a choice.

Jaurez said:
LMAO!

There are still some American who respect education and intellect, you know. We’re not all Tea Partiers.

I still after MEDIAite’s usual crack pot reporting or the accompanying article tell for sure if this new ‘ Sun News ” is actually a Murdoch property, or simply being compared to one.

I guess I’m going to have to go to an actual news source to find my answer because the way it’s been reported on here it might as well be ‘ The Mystery Channel North ‘.

I’ll let you know what I find out.

Harry Flashman said:
The first shot across the bows of the new conservative network by liberal critics. Typical. Criticize the women, not the content of the network.

They really gonna hate them when their rating shoot upward now that Canadian viewers have a choice.

That’s because there IS no content on this network to judge – whatever is on the air, it’s beyond awful

And no, this isn’t owned by Murdoch nor does he have any say about this network. In fact, I doubt he even knows about it.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
You’re right. She doesn’t dress like a hooker, and her only degrees are from Stanford and Oxford (including a PhD from the latter).

I hear she wrote her dissertation on the various flavors of the world’s tuna.

America needs to get all of the lunatic-left d-crat socialist women to explicitly show their support for radical islamic America-hating muslims by covering themselves from head to tow in muslim-wear, especially face-covering veils. Not only will that let all patriotic Americans see where these lunatic-lefties stand in the war against those that want to destroy us, but it will BEAUTIFY AMERICA !!!! Imagine, a country where michelle “marie antoinette” obozo, rosie odonnell, janet napolitano, corrine brown, claire mccaskill, maxine waters, rachel maddow, regina benjamin (“You Lie” ‘s surgeon general) and the many, many other uggos of the lunatic-left are no longer visible. Why, it would be heaven on Earth !!!

Jaurez said:
LMAO!

And I’ll bet she’s never done a black man either, Jaurez. Damned phony liberals.

ohwell said:
And no, this isn’t owned by Murdoch nor does he have any say about this network.

Come on… don’t let facts get in the way.

And here I thought the left in America had told us that FNC was “banned” from having a network in Canada.

Oops.

LMAO! So the network isn’t even 4 days old and some lefty tool is already trying to shovel dirt on it? What proof more do you need that the lefties are crapping their pants? If you remember correctly, that’s the same reaction the lefties here had when Fox News was launched.

ImNotBlue said:
And here I thought the left in America had told us that FNC was “banned” from having a network in Canada.

Oops.

Yep , Ganymede , and Royal

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-north-claims-its-first-casualty-with-help-from-margaret-atwood/#comments

Harry Flashman said:
The first shot across the bows of the new conservative network by liberal critics. Typical. Criticize the women, not the content of the network.

They really gonna hate them when their rating shoot upward now that Canadian viewers have a choice.

Not really….I’m in the biggest TV market in the country and my cable provider isn’t even interested in launching the network on “pay TV “. Despite what that little wee network and the righties-lite that inhabit our world would have you think, our news channels provide just that…..news. From local to country to international ~ we get to see and hear what’s going on. There’s no vast left-wing bias in our news….it’s just the view when absolutely everything else out there is left-of-Fox. Mind you, I’m pretty sure even our Conservatives aren’t righty enough for FOX.

Mr. Murdoch sure knows his target demo.

If you have ever seen the chicks on CBC Rachel looks good.

Yikes!

ImNotBlue said:
And here I thought the left in America had told us that FNC was “banned” from having a network in Canada.

Oops.

This isn’t owned by Fox or News Corp

Oops to you.

Critics Call Canadian ‘Fox News North’ More ‘Hot Chicks And Sexy Outfits’ Than Politics”

And? And?

The video quality and set looks like an Onion video. Just putting that out there

TeaPartyPatriot said:
America needs to get all of the lunatic-left d-crat socialist women to explicitly show their support for radical islamic America-hating muslims by covering themselves from head to tow in muslim-wear, especially face-covering veils. Not only will that let all patriotic Americans see where these lunatic-lefties stand in the war against those that want to destroy us, but it will BEAUTIFY AMERICA !!!! Imagine, a country where michelle “marie antoinette” obozo, rosie odonnell, janet napolitano, corrine brown, claire mccaskill, maxine waters, rachel maddow, regina benjamin (“You Lie” ’s surgeon general) and the many, many other uggos of the lunatic-left are no longer visible. Why, it would be heaven on Earth !!!

What America needs is to get all of the lunatic far-right teabagging racist, hateful bigots like you out of the country because you’re embarrassing us all to hell. What a joke you are. You must be very proud of your ignorant view of the Muslim religion. You wouldn’t know a damn thing about religion if it bludgeoned you over the head, so stay out of that territory before you make more of an ass out of yourself.

Wow, really? Do you mean that, after four long days, this network isn’t beating the crap out of their competition? Man, they may as well just close their doors right now, ‘cuz a bunch of liberals told them they don’t amount to anything!

What a larf riot! You idiot puppets never cease to amaze me with your stupidity!

Eruptor75 said:
What is her PhD in? Advanced Cunnilingus.

Lol, she studies Progressive Public Policy and Politics…To get that , all you need to do is show up and kiss ass. Her PHD is in a field of study is a weed lot… void of any critical thinking, logic, objective reasoning ability or measurable skill. What she has, is a Doctorate in ‘Tool’.

…and this matters, because?
lol

ImNotBlue said:
And here I thought the left in America had told us that FNC was “banned” from having a network in Canada.

Oops.

Oddly enough, the rejection of Sun News’ application for a mandatory access license is the source of the erroneous report from leftist sites that Fox News isn’t allowed to be in Canada. Sun News has nothing to do with Fox News or Rupert Murdoch, and FNC is broadcast on a large number of Canadian cable and satellite providers.

republicans sure luv em some bimbos….fox news has a slew of them….its the only porn their wives let them watch…wingnuts whacking off looking at an already pregnant megyn kelly…..they wake up to crotch shots from gretchen carlson and go to sleep fantasizing about greta…….sickos

ProObamaAgenda said:
. . . and go to sleep fantasizing about greta…….sickos

Now that is sick.

ohwell said:
This isn’t owned by Fox or News Corp Oops to you.

Oops to me indeed! Here I was, sucked in by the propaganda of the FOX haters… when even less of their bogus report about Sun News turns out to be true!

Good work!

ProObamaAgenda said:
republicans sure luv em some bimbos….fox news has a slew of them….its the only porn their wives let them watch…wingnuts whacking off looking at an already pregnant megyn kelly…..they wake up to crotch shots from gretchen carlson and go to sleep fantasizing about greta…….sickos

Why do you hate attractive women?

I got to start watching that show, I like watching hot chick give news.

Ummm… I saw maybe one “hot chick” in that video. At least as far as faces go.

The King is big on defending women, as long as they’re on the extreme far left. If not, well, then it gets ugly.

notsofast said:
Critics Call Canadian ‘Fox News North’ More ‘Hot Chicks And Sexy Outfits’ Than Politics”

And? And?

A great observation… what’s the scandal? Seriously?