Republican Rachel Maddow Hate Jokes in 3…2…..1….. 

The Madcow disease

Why so scared maddow?

The feeling is mutual….

The lemons are bitter 

“Liberal” is an ugly word now, its weird. Last year, there was a similar study that concluded there were more “Conservatives” than “Liberals” yet there were more “Progressives” than “Conservatives”. I dont think most people even know the definition of the words.

Point being, there’s often a huge gulf between what people say and what they actually do. 

Liberals hate the truth.

It’s hilarious to see a left-wing nutjob call out a bunch of left-wing nutjobs at Politifact for being dishonest

Politifact need to take their site down. Their credibility is shot to hell. They’re lying liars!

Liberals can’t handle the truth when it doesn’t confirm their prejudices.  By the way, if 40% are conservative,  and half of moderates are  split evenly (which in itself isn’t a given since liberals are only 21% overall), if you figure half the moderates are conservative you add 17.5% and conservatives number 57.5% compared to only 38.5% liberal.  So, Rubio seems pretty well on the mark…   My argument would be if 40% of America are conservative then 40% of the moderates are too, compared to only 21% liberal, so slightly less  than half the 35% – lets say 13%, compared to 1/5 for liberals – lets say thats 7%, so that makes the math 53% conservative to 28% liberal.  No matter how you cut it, Maddow’s ideology is the minority (thank god).

Maddow is the one that has broadcast at least 2 fake news stories (from parody sites similar to ‘The Onion’) – I would say she is the real disaster here. 

Chuck, don’t waste your time arguing with a liberal.  They are born liars and don’t like the truth.

I do not trust politifact at all,  so call facts about republican or democrat.

blacks as conservative as republicans.  
http://www.gallup.com/poll/112807/blacks-conservative-republicans-some-moral-issues.aspx

The two of you are proving right now that you’re the “born liars” who “don’t like the truth”.

Maddow makes fun of those parody sites… Republicans think those stories are real..

http://www.mediaite.com/online/gop-congressman-fooled-by-a-year-old-onion-article-about-planned-parenthoods-abortionplex/

The truth is that conservatives are a minority. Your math is totally baseless. 40% is not a majority by any stretch of the imagination. Polit”Fact” rated an objectively false statement as “Mostly True” instead of as the lie that it is.

PolitiFarce is “left-wing”? That’s truly hilarious.

Yes, Politi”Fact” is worthless, and has been for a long time. What’s the point of a “fact-checker” that doesn’t actually check facts?

BS….

She was fooled twice.

Of course this article conveniently forgets to mention that Rachel Maddow has a long and frequent history of getting busted by PolitiFact.  They nail her all the time and Rachel flips out over it all the time, including last year when she freaked after getting caught again misleading on Wisconsin’s politics and PolitiFact stuffed her big-time in a follow-up: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2011/feb/25/responding-rachel-maddow/

I’d think if Will Wheaton, er, excuse me, Rachel Maddow was a conservative, Mediaite would’ve been sure to mention this.  Then again, Mediaite is staffed by lying liberal phonies akin to Maddow.

dude you suck at math…   

Chuck, the PolitiFact article (correctly quoted by Maddow) said the conservative/Republican number maxed out at 45%, same for liberal/Democrat. That isn’t “most.” Politifact is wrong, Rachel is right, and all of that stuff you wrote is twaddle.

Rachel was fooled by “ChrisTwire” once, as many people continue to be. She copped to it, and seemed somewhat delighted by being taken in. Doubtful that The Onion got her, though it has taken in many conservatives.

So the flaw must be that 40% of Americans are conservative. Come on!!! We all know this number is HIGHLY INFLATED.

40% is not the majority Chuck.  Politico broke down the moderate between left leaning moderates and right leaning moderates, but there were still moderates in the middle.  

 So… since she was fooled and republicans were fooled… don’t you think its hypocritical commenting that she was fooled when you guy were fooled yourse….. never mind its clueless to explain your a republican…

carry on.

One may say they lean left, one may say they lean right. Yet neither might vote that way.  Rachel has a right to give her opinion on her show as do the many conservatives on Fox have a right to give theirs. Calling  her names and stating her sexual preference is just ridiculous. I wish we could debate these articles on a political topic without resulting in insults being thrown around.

When you guy were fooled yourse?

What?

Are you ten years old, or did you attend a failing public school? LOL

What logic are you using there, Chuck? 
A Most Americans are conservative. 
B Conservatives are the biggest ideological group. 
Those two statements are not identical. It is wrong to conflate. There is also a difference between an ideological group and a political group. You seem comfortable mixing them up. 
I will give you two reasons why you are wrong. If conservatives have always dominated the US landscape, why have 2 liberal presidents been elected in the past 20 years if liberals are only 1 in 5 Americans?
Secondly, how do you explain the popularity of progressive policies today?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/2012/02/14/gIQALm4cDR_photo.html 

Basically, self ID is a wash. Look at what people actually do or vote for.

Are you kidding me? Who dropped you on your head? Politifact need to leave the building. It’s over for them. They’re lying liars who can NEVER be trusted with the word “fact”.

Tell it!

Blacks are social conservatives. Actually, they are the most religious voting block in the US. Those two go together. They are economic liberals and vote for the DP for that reason mainly and because of the GOP’s southern strategy.

You do realize that websites like  LiberalBias.Net have dis-proven that most of the media has a liberal bias…..

You do realize that websites like  LiberalBias.Net have dis-proven that most of the media has a liberal bias…..

You do realize that websites like  LiberalBias.Net have dis-proven that most of the media has a liberal bias…..

You do realize that websites like  LiberalBias.Net have dis-proven that most of the media has a liberal bias…..

When we take the White House back we are going to put her in a camp until she realizes she likes men and wants to give birth to 5 Republican children.
Oh…we also want her to wear a little white apron and pearls all the time.
Even at breakfast.
She will name the boys Wally and Theodore, Chip, Richie and Opie.
She’s gonna’ love it.

I’ll help – I’m a liberal: someone who sees things as they really are, without ideology, & generally accepts the Enlightenment, science, & the ideals of human rights & equality. 

Progressives are not necessarily liberals, but mostly turn out to be so. They believe in better government making for better lives for more people. 

(You can see the daylight between liberals & progressives right there: liberals experience somewhat less frustration with things progressing then regressing.) 

Conservatives are … well, I’m really not sure what they are any more, because most of those who call themselves conservatives these days are anti-science reactionary authoritarians. There actually used to be folks who called themselves conservative progressives or vice versa. I think most of those folks now call themselves Richard Lugar.

I didn’t like my 7th grade history teacher, but he taught me something that I’ll always remember:

[1] Reactionary – wants to go backward
[2] Conservative – wants to keep things the same
[3] Liberal – wants change
[4] Radical – wants change NOW

Most people are “liberal.” Everyone wants progress, unless you are a Teatard who thinks only property owners should vote. (That’s what the Founding Fathers thought.)

Oh, too bad: you JUST missed it, by 180 degrees.

You lunatics aren’t going to win anything.

Except that it’s PolitiFarce that has a long history of lying. They get repeatedly called out for “fact-checking” that doesn’t actually check the facts and results in inaccurate ratings.

People don’t know what they are any more. People who used to call themselves socialists now call themselves moderates. Lots of people who self-identify as conservatives are in fact radical regressives. Lots of others who call themselves conservatives are all for big ticket items making up the social safety net, but just don’t understand what being for those says about their political positions. People are, individually, for the most part, ignorant, ill-informed, easily led, illogical, over-emotional & stupid. But collectively the various flawed parts largely cancel each other out, resulting in a collective wisdom that’s simply dull conventional.

PolitiFact: Won the Pulitzer Prize for its work
Madcow: Propagandist that regularly meets with Democrats and their political operatives on spin (including 8 times with the charlatan in the White House)

Gee, wonder who to believe here.  Then again, Maddow did work in Starfleet.  Or was that Will Wheaton. 

Starting at 2 pm CST everyday MSNBC runs an 8 hour block of pure opinion shows. Where are the news reports? Compare their schedule to FOX or CNN

Starting at 2 pm CST everyday MSNBC runs an 8 hour block of pure opinion shows. Where are the news reports? Compare their schedule to FOX or CNN

Starting at 2 pm CST everyday MSNBC runs an 8 hour block of pure opinion shows. Where are the news reports? Compare their schedule to FOX or CNN

And you will  be the milk man.
We will name you …..Gus .
4 quarts and one heavy cream please….Gus.

Starting at 2 pm CST everyday MSNBC runs an 8 hour block of pure opinion shows. Where are the news reports? Compare their schedule to FOX or CNN

 Mr. PorkChops was letting a comment trail off because it was no use trying to explain it to idesign2, hence the two words “never mind” after what you assumed was a spelling error.   (btw, a 10 year old attending public school would have known that)

Reality and truth have a liberal bias.

In fact those 2 things are SO liberal tha thet conservofascists avoid them both at all costs.

got a chuckle on you being corrected on the brilliance of maddow and then stating it’s hypocritical.  What the heck was your comment?

I’m sorry son but you flunked debate 101.

Dawn, please explain “when you guy were fooled”.

How about, when your guy was fooled…

And what is “yourse”? LOL

Is MrporkChop your dimwiited child?

This is not a fair definition…

Ok, I take that as an intellectual attempt at right-wing humor. Keep practicing!

All you did was provide your own definition of the word and say that people are the definition you provided.

40% of the country identifies as conservative. 20% as liberal.

YOU are the ‘tard.

 MSN leans left…. but Fox News says they are Fair and Balanced.

40% of the country identifies as conservative. 20% liberal.

What the hell is your point?

Way to not give a biased answer.

“I’ll help-I’m a liberal. This means I’m smart, live in the real world, and am not an intolerant a hole like conservatives”

“Conservative are….well, they’re just dumb.”

And most of those 40% don’t actually know what it really means to be conservative. If you ask them what the want the government to do, you’ll see support for a great many liberal ideas.

Which shows how little the Pulitzer Prize has come to mean.

And, “the charlatan in the White House”? Does that mean you’re a Birther?

What’s your point? For roughly 24 hours a day, Fox runs Republican propaganda. Their “news reports” are just as biased and inaccurate as their commentary shows.

My point is that 40% is not a majority. It’s a minority. That should be obvious even to you. But apparently, the dunces at PolitiFarce don’t understand that.

What the heck does it matter anyway?  Nobody watches her show.  It’s ratings suck.  She may as well be talking to the wall.

We lunatics kicked your a_s in the senate elections a couple of years ago.  Remember that?  Perhaps folks could see through all the b.s. then as they do now. 

Life’s unfair; deal with it.

So, you have actually talked to that 40% of those conservatives and found this out for yourself?  When someone makes an outrageous claim like you just did with NO backing behind it, it just makes you look ignorant.  You should already know that.

… except that’s not what I wrote. In fact, it’s not even close. 

How people define themselves really doesn’t tell you very much about them. Ask what a conservative position on Medicare, Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell, or Social Security is and they’ll probably tell you it’s to get rid of Medicare and Social Security as we know it and restore Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell. Yet, the VAST majority of the country supports Medicare, Social Security and the repeal of DADT. 

A majority of self-described conservatives are glad DADT is gone and don’t want Medicare or Social Security touched.

Therefore, I submit, the terms “liberal,” “moderate” and *especially* “conservative” has more to do with tribalism — convenient words for people to pick their sides — than it describes how well people mold into the widely-accepted meaning of each of these positions. 

When you get right down to it, this country is a Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security loving nation that’s pro-choice, isn’t a fan of all the wars we’ve been getting into and wants to put Wall Street and the Banks feet to the fire. A majority of us now favor same-sex marriage, passing environmental reforms, spending government money to create jobs and public transportation. We want more money put into education and we’re even in favor of some basic gun control, like making sure crazy people and criminals can’t buy gets and that oozies and military-grade assault weapons are off the streets. 

A lot of those issues — maybe even most of them — poll well even among people who self-describe as “conservative.” 

I’d say that makes this country a LOT more liberal than most people realize, there’s just a cognitive dissonance between where people stand on the issues and what people like to think of themselves as being.

No, it’s simply a matter of polling showing that the majority of Americans back a great many liberal policies. When you get into the range of over 80% support (such as for raising taxes on the rich), mathematically that has to include at least half of the 40% who identify as conservative.

You mean the Senate elections that left you still in the minority? Dumb*ss.

Why is it that right-wingers love to talk about ratings so much? Oh, because you’re a bunch of sheep who all watch Fox “News” and think that makes you special.

Should have said congressional elections, but my point was–as you should know by now–that the democrats, as Obama himself put it, “got shellaced.”  You’d have to be a real dumb_ss to not know what I was talking about, even with my typo.  I think you knew exactly what I was talking about.

So what is a Classical Liberal?

Watch Fox Report with Shep and SR with Bret Baier tomorrow and try to find bias or inaccuracies. Bring them back here when you do. Compare the hosts and correspondents at Fox with NBC’s correspondents (MSNBC doesn’t have any, they share with NBC).

Yes, and the American people know that election was one of the biggest disasters this country has ever experienced. Prepare for a landslide defeat of the Republican Tea Party this time.

Yea, that’s it, Cal.  How did you guess that I think I’m special?  And, by the way, ratings are a pretty good indicator of who gives a sh_t about your message.  Hence, no one cares about her message.  It’s pretty simple, Cal.  Perhaps right wingers believe in bottom line results, unlike many liberals who support Obama even without his providing any results.  Ratings are representative of results.   

Right! Politifact won a freakin’ Pulitzer! Okay, it’s their only prize – but what did Maddow ever win? 
Um … 1994: - Honorable Mention, Eli Weisel Foundation for Humanity Prize in Ethics  2008: - “Lesbian/Bi Woman of the Year (American)” in AfterEllen’s 2008 Visibility Awards.  2009: - AWRT Gracie Award; - Proclamation of Honor from the California State Senate; - only cable news show nominated for a Television Critics Association award in the Outstanding Achievement in News & Information category; - GLAAD Media Award for Outstanding TV Journalism in a segment  2010; - honorary LLD at Smith College in Northampton, MA in May 2010.- Maggie Award for ongoing reporting of healthcare reform & the anti-abortion movement; - Walter Cronkite Faith & Freedom Award by The Interfaith Alliance  2012: - John Steinbeck Award (presented by Steinbeck’s son Thomas -money quote: ”Listening to Rachel Maddow is like listening to Walter Cronkite. We have that kind of trust in her. When I watch Rachel Maddow, I feel like I’m part of an alliance. I hope she’s in it for the long haul, because we really need her.”

“I wish we could debate these articles on a political topic without resulting in insults being thrown around.” Most of the time, that’s all they got.

…and you are also a race playing doofus.

So, everyone who hated Bush was….?

Admit it – the man has not acted like a President.  Divisiveness and class warfare as a weekly diet does not constitute a statesman, but rather a charlatan.  I want more from my President.  

Rachel is ripping the ish out of Politifact. You’d think they would have slithered away by now. But they have no shame!  Politifact needs to shut it down! No one gives a flying ______ about them anymore!

Man, Cal…  You are projecting your opinions upon “the American people” as if you know what they’re thinking.  That entire premise is delusional.  Obama’s approval ratings are the eowrst in history.  Does that mean that all the American people consider him a failure, too?  According to your twisted logic, it might.

Chops, lets try to come together on something today. Ignore the Fox opinion shows and watch the news reports. Tomorrow, watch the Fox Report with Shep and Special Report with Bret. If you find any bias or inaccuracies, bring them back here. Do your own research and decide, don’t get spun by Stewart or Mediamatters!!

If Republicans cared about results, they wouldn’t want to watch a channel (Fox) that’s proven to provide the least accurate news reporting.

Yes, he has acted like a president. The divisiveness and class warfare haven’t come from him. They’ve come from his right-wing opponents.

Your comment on “right to opinion” and “insulting” might hold water, if Maddow didn’t frequently insult and demagogue many on her show with epithets like “disaster”, “teabagger”, etc.  Unlike Rachel, the people calling her Madcow (which she is) don’t have the perk of a national TV show nor get to work for politicians and affect public policy . 

No, Obama’s approval ratings aren’t anywhere close to being “the worst in history”. Do you remember his predecessor’s 23% approval rating?

“If Republicans cared about results, they wouldn’t want to watch a channel (Fox) that’s proven to provide the least accurate news reporting.”

Oh really.  Who proved that to you?  You really do make some outrageous claims with no proof at all.  Webster’s dictionary defines that exact thing as delusional.  However, I’m all ears.  Who was it that provided that information?  MSNBC?

 That’s Shep and Bret Baier… what about the other shows? any bias or inaccuracies in them?

Well, I looked up Gallups polling data, and you have a point.  You really have to look at averages, since both of these guys have had highs and lows.  Obama’s is 4 points higher than Bush’s.  I stand corrected.  However, I say again, Obama is only 4 pts. higher than the guy you libs hate.  And I do mean hate.  Remember when he was running for president, and people were calling him the savior of this country?  Now, he is in a near tie with with Bush on his approval ratings.  You should be so proud of your president.   

I totally agree! 
“Conservative are….well, they’re just dumb.” and “I’m a liberal. This means I’m smart, live in the real world, and am not an intolerant a hole like conservatives”.. But I would also add ”
intolerant homophobe, anti science, anti immigration, anti reality, anti-woman’s health 
a hole, ”

agreed, they are really pissing me off. coming up with some wierd definitions of the truth. and wasting time, on thins like fact checking like Ricky Martin on Glee? WTF?  Seriously? They need to call it a wrap! 

any facts to back up your claim? of course not, just typical empty right wing rhetoric. 

Yeah I mean really…Fox never injects opinion into their reporting…*sarcasm off

WTF. 40% is not most. haha.

She is jumping on identification by labels.True or false… is just plain STUPID.
These definitions about labels has lost their real meaning.Rachel is playing smart
talking about some label like have some meaning.”Conservatives” wants big spending
in military for masive wars like Iraq and “progresive” wants wars in Lybia and Syria.
So…on place she to argue for Warfares,Wellfares and Libertarians she play hysterical
bullshit about fanasy land of imaginary political labels.

OMFG She mentioned Wisconsin? on MSNBC? Really?

They get repeatedly called out by  Media Matters when their results dont agree with what Media Matters wants you to believe. Or at least they used to :)

Proven by Media Matters? I ask people every day to show me the FOX lies, so far Ive had 2 different people link me to comedy central, and thats it…

Has anyone ever seen Maddow and Wheaton in the same room? hmmm

Charlatan in the white house refers to the fact that hes been pretending to govern for 3 years and counting…

Weeeeeeelll.. Politifact is right with ranking this as true, don’t get me wrong I consider myself slightly liberal, but it really is mostly true. If Rubio said a plurarity of Americans are conservative, he would get a true rating, but as majority means over 50%, he was wrong on that. The sad truth is that around 40% of Americans are conservative, 25% are liberal, and 35% are moderates.

Why cant Fast and Furious get any coverage on MSNBC?

Shep, Brett, Megyn would never lie to me or you.

I bet you know all about highly inflated numbers. Most liberals seem to be experts.

Some are just stupid and believe the BS..

Im surprised he didnt cite a study from Harvard proving it…

We dont bother to hate her.

My friend just met a chocolate man on Blackwhitemeet.COMit’s where for men and women looking for interracial’ship for a fabulous lifestyle
It’s a nice place for black white sing’les, to interact with each other…no bounds or extremes in front of true love.

No need to worry your pretty little head about it, Missy. Relax.

 Go fix yourself a nice cup of French Vanilla coffee and let the men sort it out.

Ha. I’ve seen Fast and Furious coverage on MSNBC. 

Crap! Pure CRAP !!!

A Classical Liberal, aka libertarian by today’s standards, is a true liberal.
Modern “liberal” are nothing more than thieves who stole the once proud name liberal.

America’s quality of education had plummeted since the Dept of Education’s inception in 1979. You can’t argue against these facts.

Only a foolish “liberal” would think that something that has failed miserably would be considered a success.

Who would have imagined in our lifetime, that PolitiFact, one of the most favorite and frequently quoted source of “facts” by those(and their sheeple) on the left, would now become a thing of ridicule by purported journalists, in a supposedly news network.

Fascinating how things change….smh

Who knows, maybe someday the left-wing “news media” might actually say Obamacare in its entirety, is in fact a disaster by any standards.

There was a time that all I heard the left refer to for truth was “PolitiFact”

I truly love watching liberals when they are presented with FACTS and the beads of sweat gather on their foreheads….veins pop out in their necks…..huge fangs appear over their lips…blood rushes to their faces…and they hiss like pissed felines.
Thanks for the laughs.

I believe Rubio said, a majority of Americans believe in the Constitution also

Well, that’s like asking if puppies are adorable. Even if you don’t ignore the horrible stuff in the Constitution, the hamster is still going to press the button that says “CONSTITUTION = AWESOME.”

THAT’S NOT A MAJORITY!

“ Nobody can do the Shing-a-ling like I do. Nobody can do the Skate like I do. Nobody can do the Boogaloo like I do”

See?! Nobody is Somebody

Neil, I have the same trouble with liberals–they never seem to be able to offer any proof of what they are spewing.

If you want to go down this road then….LIberals are spineless,ignorant,insecure,twits…& I’m being civil…because liberals are born ususally extremely unattractive & physically handicapped ..is why they usually rely on their intellect…Thats all they have!!! They’re lonely ,pathetic humans..who envy us conservatives for having a full ,wholesome lives…

mmmm
Ok
I guess
Reactionary- wants 70% tax rate like in the 50′s (wants to go backwards)
Conservative-wants clean air and water (wants to keep things the same)
liberal-wants the exception to always be the rule( changing the majority of lives for a small minority)
radical-fixing something that not broke completly clueless of the implications (Obama)
See like your teacher and Butch Maddow we can get into semantics too.

Yeah, except when your the WH Chief of Staff…..then you get a pass on reality and truth…right?

For you to say that about FOX only emboldens us that know that MSNBC is a piece of crap network that doesn’t do news. Hell they pander to my community (black) and then on the weekends they glorify prison life for the same said community.

Racist TV at it’s best

Why would anyone kid you? Are you a kid?

Life is unfair? Thats rich right there. Then why don’t you quit trying to make it artificially fair.

Your whole ideology is based on some evasive definition of enforcement of fairness….yet you proclaim that life is unfair…and then of course say…..deal with it.

And since we’re in the business of labeling conservatives anti science, then we ought lable liberals anti-math.

Because they see no issue with our entitlement spending leviathon, they see no issue with our deficit and debt, and have convinced themselves that taxing millionaires and billionaires will some how fix all our budgetary problems.

And then, we ought to see liberals/progressives as also ant-reality.  Because they can simply look across the Atlantic at all the insolvent nations who have arrived at the endgame of progressive liberalism, as their nations slowly collapse under the crushing weight of their debt, and yet liberals make no connection.  

Yeah..we’re the dumb ones….good call Hout.

 Starting at 2pm?…..I beg to differ….

I believe it starts at 9am, going through closing.

Morning Joe only slightly attempts to pass itself off as right leaning. w RINO Joe, still carries Obama’s water, while pretending to be a Republican….

Your name implies violence and hate speech…I have reported you to the Liberal Task Force of Political Correctness for immediate action.

The crossover from classic liberal to modern liberal cam when a portion of the population realized they can  can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.

Its All FREE!… I promise!  Dont Worry…your grandchildren will cover it! 

Nicely said.

I could care less what LiberalBias.net has to say. 

I can watch the bias when I hear the mainstream media not talk about how Obama’s proposed budget would never pass the senate with 51 votes (even though thats all it needs),

 or how his budget would continue to accrue massive debt after the budgetary tricks are exposed.

Or the fact that two budgets are sitting in the Senate right now that HArry Reid refuses to put on the floor,

Or how the shrinking unemployment numbers are a result of the workforce hemmoraging people from the labor pool.

Do I need a website to tell me that all these things are simple oversights in reporting and not Bias.?

I do if thats what I want to believe.

It would be funny if they weren’t in charge of the economy.

You can also find radical regressives in large numbers down at the OWS protests.  They call themselves anarchists. 

What side of the political spectrum do they subcribe to?

Really….then maybe they ought to change their opinion on the GOP when they collectively realize what the lefts “War on Poverty” has done to them.

Politifacts problem is that reality has a well known liberal bias.  It’s just embarrassing how biased towards liberals they would seem if they call every fact accurately.  Give them a break Rach.

Yes.  Some people can judge a statement as fact based on it being objectively, you know, true.  However, it is more sound by far to judge a statement as being fact based on the owner of the statement having won a Pulitzer Prize.  

Um…if they call themselves anarchists, then they obviously don’t subscribe to any sides of the political spectrum.  However, you seemed to equate regressives with anarchists…interesting.

Without any doubt at all he has acted like a president.  The most divisive force in America today is Fox News.

There’s an entire wikipedia page dedicated to Fox News controversial reporting and Pew Research has declared that Fox News is the most ideological cable network, mostly agreed upon by Fox News viewers who don’t see that as a bad thing.

http://www.people-press.org/2009/10/29/fox-news-viewed-as-most-ideological-network/

That sounds weirdly like the plot of the Stepford Wives.  You know that nightmarish film where liberal gals get turned into conservative women, like the one Newt is married to.

I never said that Fox doesn’t lean to the right.  Their talking heads do lean to the right, just as MSNBC’s lean to the left.  I will not argue there.  However, my previous post asked for proof that Fox News is “the most inaccurate” of the news agencies.  Being ideological is not the same as being inaccurate.  You are missing the point. 

Interesting huh?  If you don’t equate anarchists to regressive Ideology…what do you equate them to?

And as for the political spectrum they gravitate to…I dont see them plotting to kidnap DNC delgates, I dont see them violently protesting at DNC conventions, I dont see them a Tea Party Rallies, and when you google who they advocate poltically when they do announce an endorsment….its always a Democrat…..

So is it still “obvious” to you that they don’t subscribe to a political party?

If so…wanna buy a bridge in New York?

When this is what you talk about…..you have nothing to talk about. Maddow is good at one thing and one thing only; being smug and mocking people in the power structure. Oh sprinkle in a little dorm room “irony”, to boot. I suppose, when your friends and people you like, make up the entire power structure of America in 2012, you do entire segments where you quibble about meaningless fluff. Bravo Ms. Maddow, bravo!

News Ninja:

“Fox News Audience Just 1.38% Black
Fox News may be the undisputed ratings champion in cable news, but not among black viewers.
The New York Times’ Brian Stelter tweeted that, according to Nielsen
Media Research, Fox News has averaged just 29,000 black viewers in
primetime so far this television season (9/09-7/10). That represents
just 1.38% of its 2.102 million total viewer audience.”

So, you’re one of the 29,000  News Ninja?  LOL!

–Cobra

 Chuck,

 If people purposely call themselves “moderate”, that means that they DON’T WANT TO BE LABELED “conservative” or “liberal.”

 What the hell is wrong with you?

–Cobra

Good call, Rachel. If PolitiFact for some reason regards Gallup as the fount of all wisdom, then it has to concede that only 40 percent are picking the conservative label, not a majority. What is the factual basis for asserting that moderates are evenly split in the directions they lean? If anything, I would “guess” that most moderates lean leftward, choosing the term “moderate” because “liberal” has been so demonized in recent decades. 

 So Joe Scarborough was secretly plotting to be an undercover leftist media operative while serving as a conservative Republican Congressman in Florida during the 90′s?

 Do you know how your stuff sounds when you read it out loud?

–Cobra

Is all you do deflect and ignore, porky? This article is about Maddow – get with the picture and stop being irrelevant. 

  The right has so demonized the word liberal that liberals now call themselves moderate or progressive. And that’s a fact but not a PolitiFact.

Maddow is not scared, did you listen to her last night?  If not, please, you sound very ignorant on the issue.

Ms. Maddow is so far ahead of other political analysts…when you’re smart, you’re just smart.

What a dumb thing to say.  Get off this site unless you have something constructive to add to the conversation….you must be a tea bagger.

Actually, the fact that PolitiFact is so bad at basic math underscores our conservative argument that the Department of Education isn’t getting the job done.

(Like how I brought that full circle?)

seriously pre dance, you have a problem.

You don’t listen to the Pres do you?
lol

Too funny – blame anyone (even a freaking t.v. channel, instead of where it originates.  You guys are beyond blind.

Thank you King of Hyperbole!

LMAO!

Where are these facts we’re being presented with? Rubio’s lies are not facts, and PolitiFarce’s nonsensical rating of his lies as “Mostly True” is also not a fact.

40% is a minority, not a majority. So no, PolitiFarce was dead wrong to rate Rubio’s claim as “mostly true”.

No, he hasn’t been “pretending” to govern. He’s governed pretty well, aside from the law of  being too quick to compromise with Republicans who don’t want to compromise.

“Too funny – blame anyone (even a freaking t.v. channel, instead of where it originates.  You guys are beyond blind.”

Of course they are. They’ve been masturbating to their own propaganda and failed ideology for years. :)

Gotta love the libs.  What do you do when one of your chief propagandists is regularly busted by a fact-checking organization who won the Pulitzer Prize?  Start attacking and discrediting the Pulitzer Prize.

The post with the litany of progressive circle jerk “awards” that Madcow “won” is especially hilarious, btw.  All in all, I’m pretty sure most people would rather have a Pulitzer.  

I said plurarity, not majority.

No matter your views — how DID they come up with “mostly true” ? Quit the hating just answer the question.

It’s mostly true that John McCain won a majority of the popular vote in 2008.

Glad mediate covers this show for no one else is watching it

So, as a liberal you cry fairness in general and then claim it’s the way it is…

Too funny…

Nice breakdown Chuck….. but you really don’t have to do any assuming.
According to Webster’s definition of “majority” Rubio was 100% accurate.
Note #3

ma·jor·i·ty (m-jôr-t, -jr-)n. pl. ma·jor·i·ties
1. The greater number or part; a number more than half of the total
2. The amount by which the greater number of votes cast, as in an election, exceeds the total number of remaining votes
3. The political party, group, or faction having the most power by virtue of its larger representation or electoral strength
4. Law The status of having reached full legal age, with attendant rights and responsibilities
5. The military rank, commission, or office of a major
6. Obsolete The fact or state of being greater; superiority

Wonder when Mr Maddow will be apologizing?

She was lying her ass off last night too.

Constitution = Awesome, move to china plz.

LOL @ liberal ideas

Unlike conservatives, liberals actually have ideas.

Rachel is #24 among news anchors:
http://www.mediaite.com/power-grid/person/?q=Rachel+Maddow

Are we really surprised that she’s going off on those who have accused her of being wrong, before?
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rachel-maddow/

Of the 15 statements that they rated of Maddow’s, only 1 did they rate as ‘true’.
4 as ‘mostly true’.
3 as ‘half true’.
3 as ‘mostly false’, and 4 as ‘false’

So yeah.  She’s angry about being called out.

Rubio’s lies? again?

You correct this one as well asshole?

Is Racheal a DUDE or  CHICK, someone PLZ tell me. Did u see the size of her hands and feet , DANG !

You didn’t read the entire comment did you? I said that Politico was right that it rated this mostly true, they explained that even though it’s only a plurarity, it’s more then liberals 25% and moderates 35%

That’s not “mostly true”. It’s false. 40% is not a majority. “Close” does not count. A plurality is not a majority. It’s simple math. And in the past, PolitiFact properly made that distinction. When Ron Paul claimed there was a national poll saying the majority of Americans favored returning to the gold standard, PolitiFact rated it false, because the poll actually showed 44% in favor. Compared to 28% opposed. That’s a clear plurality too, but PolitiFact rated Paul’s statement false because a plurality is not a majority. What’s different now?

But Rubio didn’t say plurality. He said majority. Thus, his statement was false, since a plurality is not a majority.

No, she’s angry about PolitiFarce being an inaccurate and flat-out dishonest “fact-checker”.